China completed the construction of the hull for its second aircraft carrier

77
Edition South China Morning Post reports that the Chinese shipyard completed the construction of the hull of the second aircraft carrier of the PLA Navy. Representatives of the Chinese Ministry of Defense report that the aircraft carrier was designed and built exclusively by Chinese forces - without the involvement of foreign specialists. The material with reference to the PLA command says that in the near future the necessary equipment will be installed on the aircraft carrier.

It should be noted that at the moment, the Chinese Navy is armed with one aircraft carrier. This is the Liaoning included in the composition fleet about 3 years ago. At its core, this is the completed TARK "Riga" (until 2012 - "Varangian"). Launching of this warship built on the Black Sea
shipyard in Nikolaev, was held in 1988 year. He needed additional equipment, but after the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine did not have the means to complete it.



As a result, negotiations began on the sale of an aircraft carrier to China. In 1998, the transaction took place. And Ukraine then sold it at a price of 25 million dollars, which can be considered a real gift to China. It is necessary to add that they sold “Varyag” (“Liaoning”) to China not as a warship, but as a “game floating park - an amusement park”. Now the Chinese navy is "having fun" on it, and the million dollars received by Ukraine 25 quickly went to the pockets of the officials who signed up for this deal.

Details about the new aircraft carrier for the PLA Navy while a little. It is known that it is built on the principle of the Soviet aircraft carrier acquired from Ukraine.

Китай завершил строительство корпуса для своего второго авианосца


In Beijing, they say that the carrier fleet will allow China to defend its interests in the oceans, primarily in the South China and East China Seas, where there are many disputed territories for which Beijing claims.
  • http://www.scmp.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    28 October 2016 13: 30
    Eeeh white envy smoothly turning into black! sad
    1. +14
      28 October 2016 13: 42

      As a result, negotiations began on the sale of an aircraft carrier to China. In 1998, the deal took place. And then Ukraine sold it at a price of $ 25 million,


      Here Ukrainians are now scratching turnips - they have cheapened.
      1. +9
        28 October 2016 14: 12
        Quote: cniza
        Here Ukrainians are now scratching turnips - they have cheapened.

        It wouldn’t be too cheap for us to sell advanced weapons to the Chinese. The lack of territorial claims against Russia from China is a very controversial issue for me.
        1. +7
          28 October 2016 14: 59
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          The lack of territorial claims against Russia from China is a very controversial issue for me.

          At one time, a military expert back in the nineties said roughly that look at the PRC, if it begins to develop ground forces at an accelerated pace, then this is preparation for a war with the Russian Federation, if it begins to build a fleet, especially in the far zone, then a challenge to the Anglo-Saxons. In a word, the ground army is only being modernized, and the PRC has thrown all its forces into the construction of the fleet. And everything is logical, the main population of the PRC in the Yangtze Valley and the Yellow River, as well as on the coast of the East and South China Seas. The transport, processing and other infrastructures are designed for this. The so-called developed resources of Siberia, in the form of wells and other developments, are located in the north of Western Siberia, i.e. Not at all within walking distance, and their infrastructure in the form of pipes, railways and roads have a European direction. And the PRC is critically dependent, primarily on the marine supply of hydrocarbons and food. Also, now a new round of the colonial division of Africa and the PRC simply puts it on this, again we must sail and protect the trade route. Naturally, they again aspire to hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region, and there, unlike the Superpower - the Russian Federation (that is, a country capable of zeroing all of China) there are many resource-rich countries, and with a ready-made marine infrastructure. Anglo-Saxons provide them with security, but unlike the Russian Federation, a direct clash with them can be avoided by gradually squeezing them economically and politically. A typical example of the Philippines, a former unsinkable US aircraft carrier. Well, of course, China refuel in the Persian Gulf, and again the dependence is critical. Therefore, territorial disputes or friendship with the Russian Federation have nothing to do with it, objective reasons are pushing China toward the sea. Plus, crazy people like Mao and Dan's smallbodies left the ruling elite, and pragmatists came. Mao began, and Dan continued, when they sold their people to the West as slaves, made a deal with Nixon and Dan had a card with Chinese Siberia in his office. Now all this has gone and for objective reasons the PRC is our ally, but so to speak, under guarantees, and these are our ballistic missiles.
          1. +3
            28 October 2016 22: 09
            "if she starts to develop ground forces at an increased pace, then this is preparation for war with the Russian Federation, if she starts to build a fleet, especially the far zone, then a challenge to the Anglo-Saxons" ////

            The Chinese are developing both at the same pace.
            Multi-lane highways laid to the borders of Russia (no from the Russian side
            their continuation). Jump airfields have been built. Not that tomorrow they will "start"
            but they are prepared thoroughly and in advance.

            The Americans were preoccupied and tensed to the fullest. Their fleet in the Far East is strengthening.
            And what is Russia doing?
            1. +1
              28 October 2016 23: 21
              Quote: voyaka uh
              The Chinese are developing both at the same pace.

              No, they are reducing the size of the army precisely by 300, i.e. as the strength of the Egyptian army, the freed funds are all on the fleet.
              Quote: voyaka uh
              Multi-lane highways have been laid to the borders of Russia (not on the Russian side. Jump airfields have been built. Not that tomorrow they will "start"
              but they are prepared thoroughly and in advance.
              You can cross the border, and then what? There is only one road, one railway line, THOUSAND kilometers of uninhabited taiga, Altai mountains, etc. And what's next? What's the point? In addition to the Amur, there are no borders; there is a buffer from Kazakhstan, Mongolia and the Altai Mountains impassable for the technology. But the Russian Federation is not Israel, thousands of missiles and warheads, and in the triad, a huge number of tactical systems, etc. Both Mongolia and Kazakhstan are huge deserts, very vast distances. Primorye, in addition to being not a separate principality and protected by the entire army of the Russian Federation, is armed to the teeth, nuclear submarine and surface missile carriers, both the Kyrgyz Republic and ICBMs, a powerful aviation group, etc.
              Quote: voyaka uh
              The Americans were preoccupied and tensed to the fullest. Their fleet in the Far East is strengthening.
              And what is Russia doing?

              We are building new nuclear Boreas there, we have already sent Nevsky and Monomakh, by the year Alexander III, new nuclear multi-purpose Yaseni are being built for Pacific Fleet, also Varshavyanka with Caliber and RTOs, two UDCs were planning, but apparently they won't be Mistral. The Pacific Fleet itself is second only to our SF in power.
              1. +1
                29 October 2016 13: 08
                "it is a land army for 300 people," ////

                Well, to cut the Transsiberian and BAM 300,000 troops is not necessary.
                A couple of dozen subversive groups are enough.
                Without regular supplies, the Far East will become dull.
                Though... ? No need to worry: Americans organize Lend-Lease2
                fast and efficient as always. Galaxy give them all they need
                even faster than from Moscow by rail.
                1. 0
                  30 October 2016 01: 17
                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  Without regular supplies, the Far East will become dull.

                  Warrior, forget this already, why should they cut the BAM if Beijing, Shanghai and all other cities are burned. What for? There are victims with weaker resources and no nuclear triad laughing And so there is the Northern Sea Route if that laughing
            2. +2
              29 October 2016 00: 12
              Amur itself with its tributaries, primarily Ussuri, as well as Argun, require forcing, which complicates lightning capture, gives time for a reaction. Shores for technology are lousy, then cliffs, then swamps.
      2. +12
        28 October 2016 14: 27
        Quote: cniza
        Here Ukrainians are now scratching turnips - they have cheapened.

        They didn’t sell anything. Ukraine 100500 times tried to sell "Varyag" to Russia at the most reasonable price, but our bore, Moses ... eghkm ... did Yeltsin need it? As a result, Ukraine does not need a ship at all, its maintenance requires money, and there is no one to sell it, because who needs it in the West? And besides the West, who has money?
        So they gave it to the Chinese at the price of scrap metal, only cheaper. And do not blame the Ukrainians - that they missed such a ship, the whole merit of the EBN, a low bow to him for this and a hot pan in the next world.
        1. +3
          28 October 2016 16: 22
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          that such a ship was lost, the whole merit of EBN

          Okay, at least they completely missed the RF then belay
          1. +3
            28 October 2016 17: 17
            And looking at the state of "Kuzi" - it becomes clear that two cruisers would not have pulled.
            1. +1
              30 October 2016 19: 43
              The United States did not allow the Varyag to tow through the straits for several months. But China somehow agreed ...
              And then it still had to be completed. Then they would not be pulled.
              Well, at least Peter was completed.
        2. +1
          28 October 2016 17: 36
          Moreover, even before the Belovezhsky conspiracy, the admirals offered to tow the Varyag to St. Petersburg. But EBN put it on.
      3. +1
        28 October 2016 18: 47
        Here Ukrainians are now scratching turnips - they have cheapened.

        They don’t scratch their turnips and tear their hair at the opera !!! laughing
      4. 0
        28 October 2016 22: 19
        themselves without a mustache, I had to buy, not bite my elbows. VS Chernomyrdin refused to buy. There was no money. After the conclusion of the "big" agreement of 97g, relations improved with ukrami and ... we saved.
      5. 0
        29 October 2016 18: 01
        And how do we scratch our turnips that the Union was allowed to break apart. Also rejoiced, iliots.
  2. +4
    28 October 2016 13: 31
    What can I say, well done Chinese! Somehow this news is not very pleasing to me.
    1. +1
      28 October 2016 13: 33
      And rightly not happy. We pin up @ n dig and China after that will take on us. What is there to enjoy?
      1. +3
        28 October 2016 13: 36
        Quote: Citizen of Mordor
        We pin up @ n dig and China after that will take on us

        and then India will attack us ..... well, or the new Mongolian Temurzhdin .... well, China hasn’t attacked yet?
        1. 0
          28 October 2016 13: 55
          About
          India will attack us ..... well, or the new Temurzhdin Mongolian
          I will not say, but about China, everything is clear here.
      2. +3
        28 October 2016 13: 39
        What is the source of information? Psychics, fortune tellers, tarot cards, or maybe mushrooms or grass ???
        1. 0
          28 October 2016 13: 57
          Do you look at grass-mushrooms a strong special?
          1. +1
            28 October 2016 14: 02
            Maxim, drink a glass of brandy, calm down, Friday after all! And then read the history of China, whom the Chinese have captured over the past four thousand years ??? They can crush the economy, but they can’t fight, definitely not!
            1. +1
              28 October 2016 16: 52
              Of course, I apologize, but you leave it for the bullish bullish buzz. I don’t need that. Like how a pig grunts - your problems.

              Now on the topic. Not really for
              four thousand years
              Well, just what could not change then? And actually, what difference does it make to be colonized: economic or military? You don’t have to be so near. Both of these paths are links in one chain - capture and assimilation.
              1. +2
                28 October 2016 18: 34
                a resident of Mordor, where such words were caught, ....., bydlyache - bullish buzz, grunt like a pig ...... Do you have just that? Coded? Regarding the nearness, I will not comment, I do not want to be rude. Well, the main thing, you’re staying - go and shoot yourself quietly, and there is no need to breed a panic here, the Chinese victim.
                1. +2
                  28 October 2016 18: 47
                  Quote: Hunter
                  resident of mordor, where such words were picked up

                  "Lucy" and "Vrungel's Island" sits inside there, because either a terrible Turkish or Chinese threat, the main thing is to sow panic, and if it does not work, then podzabornaya abuse laughing
                2. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +1
                    29 October 2016 08: 44
                    The voice of Mordor You will poke at the wife, although you have it vryatli. Fight under the bench, small goblin! you can’t even reach the troll, because it’s enough to write more than two lines of brains! Hrych, I gave you the right definition! Petty bzdun!
                    1. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              28 October 2016 18: 05
              Quote: Hunter
              China read, whom the Chinese over the past four thousand years have captured ???

              For example, Manchuria? You simply don’t know the history, the same Manchuria - by no means a primordially Chinese territory, or Inner Mongolia, Tibet ....
              1. +1
                28 October 2016 18: 27
                Kartos, Unlike you, I know the story well! The example of Manchuria and Inner Mongolia, causes nothing but laughter! This is the basis of modern China, and who won whom there, and how many times and what came of it all, is a separate topic! Your only argument that can be considered is Tibet! This is of course a mega conquest! But seriously, in that political situation, with another Indian player, China simply had no other choice! The Chinese, farmers, and not wars, they even had the largest and most well-equipped armies a thousand years ago or more, but this did not stop them from pecking to everyone who feels like it, including us!
                1. +1
                  28 October 2016 18: 48
                  Quote: Hunter
                  Chinese, farmers and not war

                  More excellent traders
                2. 0
                  28 October 2016 19: 25
                  Quote: Hunter
                  but this did not stop to hammer them all and sundry, including us!

                  Yes, I agree with you, but this is the point, the Chinese are peaceful not because ... they are peaceful, but because they are weak, despite their enormous numerical superiority.
                  1. +2
                    28 October 2016 21: 18
                    Kartos - you are right Einstein! yes This is called the genetic code of the nation! I explain in a popular way, if they beat you all your life, they will beat your son and grandson and great-grandson, and so on, regardless of what cool devices you can’t get! Remember, it’s not the weapon that kills and defeats, but the People! I’ve been to China five times, a very peculiar country, they really consider everyone below themselves, they hate Europeans at all! Only the opa, whose only nation they envy is the Russians (the brothers of the Tatars, Bashkirs, Caucasians, etc. they also consider you Russians), this is alarming, based on our mentality - they are trying to fix theirs! See how popular they are with everything related to Russia, our films, literature, all culture, language. I'm not talking about weapons! They very much want to be Great conquerors and make the whole world cancer, only it will never happen, and they understand this, and therefore they are currently trying to economically confuse the whole World. But even this double-edged sword, to get rid of the creditor, in certain circumstances, it is easier to kill!
                    1. +2
                      28 October 2016 21: 31
                      Quote: Hunter
                      this is alarming, based on our mentality - they are trying to fix theirs!

                      It is useless to be a Russian one must live in Russia, being determines consciousness.
                      1. +1
                        28 October 2016 21: 43
                        Words are not Boy and Husband !!! Plus with me! good drinks
                    2. +1
                      29 October 2016 08: 42
                      As for the "genetic code of the nation" - I confirm! The nation, fencing off the enemies with the GREAT WALL, instead of creating a THREATENING ARMY and crushing these enemies - that says something. There were cities in Ancient Sparta. But they HAVE NO walls! Generally (fences don't count). But attacking Sparta ...
  3. +1
    28 October 2016 13: 36
    Syria clearly shows that Russia needs aircraft carriers, including aircraft carriers. It is time for us to do something in this regard.
  4. +3
    28 October 2016 13: 52
    For the first time, an aircraft carrier was photographed only 1 a year ago ...

    This is Type001A - from an explicit, change of superstructure for Chinese equipment (radar / communications). They also say that the hangar was increased by 20%, due to the redevelopment of the interior.
    1. +1
      28 October 2016 13: 53
      And here is the first shot of Type 001A - October 25 2015 of the year.
    2. 0
      28 October 2016 13: 54
      Modified add-in.
      1. +2
        28 October 2016 14: 23
        Quote: donavi49
        Modified add-in.

        Not a superstructure, but a deckhouse. The superstructure goes from side to side. hi
        1. +2
          29 October 2016 03: 39
          Quote: professor
          Not a superstructure, but a deckhouse. The superstructure goes from side to side.

          Well, to be precise, this is an "island", this is how it is called on aircraft carriers
    3. +2
      28 October 2016 14: 18
      Quote: donavi49
      They also say that the hangar was increased by 20%, due to the redevelopment of the interior.

      Naturally, the hangar will increase; he will not have 12 anti-ship missiles Granite under the deck, as envisaged by the Soviet project, due to this place, the hangar for aircraft has become larger.
      Liaolin former Varangian.

      It is interesting that it goes completely without smoke.
      1. +1
        28 October 2016 14: 24
        Well, there are initially improved boilers - as in the Chinese 956EM. Plus they are new and again not beaten by life.

        Smoking for age-old boilers is the norm. Here is Foch / Sao Paulo for example.
        1. +1
          28 October 2016 14: 33
          Quote: donavi49
          Smoking for age-old boilers is the norm.

          I don’t know here at 0:14, he also goes fast enough and does not smoke.
      2. 0
        28 October 2016 17: 41
        The entire PU PKR "Granit" block takes place exactly 2 (two) Su-33. If they increased the hangar by 20%, then more significant redevelopments were carried out there.
        1. +1
          28 October 2016 18: 25
          Quote: spravochnik
          The entire block of PU anti-ship missiles "Granit" takes the place of exactly 2 (two) Su-33. If they have increased the hangar by 20%, then more significant redevelopment has been carried out there.

          Do you have figures for the volume of interior space that is occupied by 12 RCC Granite?
          This is how they look on the deck, but we must remember that they are not vertical but inclined and occupy a larger volume under the deck ..
          1. +2
            28 October 2016 18: 46
            So for information on the approximate size of all this under deck economy PU ZRK-300F.
    4. 0
      28 October 2016 15: 14
      Quote: donavi49
      20% increased hangar

      Most likely, PU and equipment were removed, which were designed for Granites under the project. Perhaps also involved the area used for air defense and anti-aircraft defense. But then all this will have to be provided at the expense of escort vessels, i.e. create aug. The eternal dispute of the doctrine of application.
      1. +1
        28 October 2016 17: 43
        Almost all anti-aircraft and anti-aircraft weapons are located on sponsons (they are also present on the Liaoning) and its removal will not affect the size of the hangar in any way.
  5. 0
    28 October 2016 14: 00
    Duc is a copy of the Varangian ... Ha
    1. +1
      28 October 2016 14: 08
      They have adopted the 6 aircraft carrier program until the 30 year.

      1 - Liaolin / Varangian
      2 - Type001А
      Both will carry J-15 / B (the latter with AFAR) as the main type + helicopters.

      The 24 type will be introduced to the 002 type (the GEM is classic - taking into account catapults, most likely boilers) - it is already a western-type catapult aircraft carrier, it is assumed that it will receive a sea 5-ku + aircraft DRL / refueling.

      By 30, the 2 nuclear-powered aircraft carrier of the new project will be introduced.
  6. 0
    28 October 2016 14: 12
    I wonder how it is with the power plant? Own al bought?
  7. +9
    28 October 2016 14: 21
    Another millionth example for us is capitalism under the leadership of the Communist Party ... just that!
    And we also have capitalism and also under the leadership of the party ... only thieves, officials and oligarchs.
    But they "started" almost at the same time - they have the reforms of Xing Dzyan-ping, we have the restructuring of the "hunchback" ... but the result is absolutely different!
    It's a shame for the aimlessly "wasted" years ...
    1. 0
      28 October 2016 15: 54
      Do you know why everyone, so I came with 2 leitech graduates, one in the warhead-2 of the second in the warhead-1. One after 3 YEARS of drops with early on cap 3. UNICUM and the second oak oak and can not even lay the course. It all depends on people, but we are mostly lazy people
      1. +1
        28 October 2016 21: 05
        Over the years of my "senior officers" and "command" I also came across officers from the category "oak oak" and outright lazy people with crooks, BUT ... this is absolutely not applicable to all our people!
  8. 0
    28 October 2016 14: 26
    Well done Chinese, riveting corvettes, frigates, destroyers, UDC, aircraft carriers! And we all argue - do we need - a regional land power with a second army in the world, aircraft carriers or not, and why is the YaSU destroyer?
    1. 0
      28 October 2016 14: 37
      They are already docking the 055 project cruiser (the basis is the new radars, under which they built a whole ground stand in the form of a cruiser and 2x64 VPU, more than Burke). The first in the world after the Ticonderoga CG-73 Port Royal. Although now it is a matter of classification - for the destroyers have now mutated and occupied a niche from a frigate to an aircraft carrier.
      1. 0
        28 October 2016 14: 42
        well, they still list it as a destroyer, as well as our hypothetical project "Leader" - in fact a cruiser, since it is more than 10 tons, but for some reason it goes like a destroyer.
      2. +1
        28 October 2016 14: 56
        Quote: donavi49
        They are here and the cruiser of project 055 is already docking

        Yes, they already write about him:
        Soon, China is preparing to launch the latest missile destroyer.
        The ship is known under the designation Type 055 and, according to some reports, the displacement of the destroyer will be from 12 to 14 thousand tons. The ship will be equipped with the most modern weapons to destroy an air, surface and underwater enemy, the latest electronic warfare systems to counter enemy aircraft and missiles.
        And the alleged appearance is laid out.
        1. +1
          28 October 2016 14: 58
          Another suggested variant of the appearance is Type 055.
        2. +1
          28 October 2016 16: 06
          Quote: quilted jacket
          And the alleged appearance is laid out.

          Some very familiar Chinese add-on ... smile
          Shpak has a tape recorder, the ambassador has a medallion
          1. 0
            28 October 2016 18: 29
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Some very familiar Chinese add-on ...

            If interested in the link below, read here there are still options for its intended appearance.
            Chinese "big" destroyer type 055
            http://alternathistory.com/kitaiskii-bolshoi-esmi
            nets-tip-055
    2. 0
      28 October 2016 18: 07
      Quote: Engineer
      and why destroyer YaSU?

      And then, that non-nuclear is not at all.
  9. +1
    28 October 2016 15: 16
    the aircraft carrier is designed and built exclusively by Chinese forces - without the involvement of foreign specialists

    Probably all experts quickly issued Chinese citizenship laughing
  10. 0
    28 October 2016 15: 23
    Look at the city of Huladao in China through Google Eas and see how many PLA aircraft carrier projects are real ..
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      28 October 2016 18: 34
      Quote: Angry 55
      Look at the city of Huladao in China through Google Eas and see how many PLA aircraft carrier projects are real ..

      That is not one? jab your finger, not a single aircraft carrier under construction in Huladao was found through google
  11. +1
    28 October 2016 15: 51
    And so, gentlemen, officers of Kitaeza can and we do not, I have no words. I will never be in command of a new ship etit his mother
    1. 0
      28 October 2016 20: 15
      You put the question wrong. Chinas are not so much as they have the opportunity.
    2. +1
      28 October 2016 21: 14
      I dare to assure you that the post of commander, even a sea minesweeper of the 80s built, is the dream of many naval officers!
  12. 0
    28 October 2016 15: 53
    I can’t stop wondering at the quickness and ability to work with the Chinese! So soon they with a dozen aircraft carriers riveted.
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. 0
    28 October 2016 20: 09
    It is known that it is actually being built on the principle of a Soviet aircraft carrier acquired from Ukraine.
    Who would doubt that. Purely come up with your own, this is weak. But to tear who is ahead, this is known to all.
    1. +2
      28 October 2016 21: 09
      They do it very well. Why reinvent the wheel if it has already been invented and rides great. You just need to make it well and cheaply. And let the doo.raki boast of their non-existent "advanced technologies", what they still have, if they can't do anything else ...
      1. +2
        28 October 2016 21: 53
        Yes, I'm not talking about that. It is clear that it is more profitable and cheaper to use ready-made developments. China is constantly being set as an example for all of us, as an unrivaled economically and technologically advanced power. If no one will argue about the economy, then in terms of technological development, questions arise. The Chinese are simply not able to invent something fundamentally new, breakthrough. All their technologies are borrowed or stupidly copied in the west, from Japan, or the USSR (Russia). Just do not now remember stories about paper and gunpowder. This applies to both electronics and space, and weapons, and everything else. For example, their aircraft engine, from scratch, as they say, they still have not done so. True about plowing 15 hours a day, then yes, they have no equal.
  15. 0
    29 October 2016 08: 24
    The disputed islands are tightly blocked by aviation "from the shore". The narrow-eyed are cunning. Not otherwise ... Antarctica is going to fight wassat
  16. 0
    30 October 2016 21: 35
    The main question is which power plant will be installed?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"