Military Review

America, stop: Russia ahead!

30
The Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, recognized the world role of Russia, and also noted the transition from the bipolar global system "to a multipolar construction of international relations." Meanwhile, Western analysts are warning: America, do not drive horses: Russians are ready for war.




Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, at a conference at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, explained to the audience what the foreign policy of the Russian president was based on. According to the chief intelligence officer, Putin wants his country to be perceived as a great power.

“Putin sees Russia as a great country, a great power. It is extremely important for him that his country be respected and treated as a world power on a par with the United States, ”Mr. Clapper quotes. "Lenta.ru".

According to Klapper, Russia is one of the key countries in the international arena. “We have moved from a bipolar system of the Cold War to a multipolar construction of international relations, where countries such as Russia and China see themselves - and they are such - important, if not dominant players,” said the intelligence officer. In his opinion, it is "historical a process that cannot be influenced. ”

Impossible, by the way, even through sanctions. On this topic argues one of the authors of the publication. Bloomberg.

In the article “US Stuck With Nobody's Left to Sanction in Russia Over Syria,” Nick Wadhams notes that Washington hardly has any way to exert pressure on Moscow through restrictive measures.

The US has already imposed sanctions against exporters weapons and leading Kremlin officials. Even a motorcyclist nicknamed the Surgeon, and he was "sanctioned."

Today in Washington they are eager to "punish Moscow" for actions in Syria, but they do not know how to do this. It turns out it's hard!

The White House is talking about new sanctions, but there is no specifics and, it seems, will not. John Kerry from the State Department is also silent. And the European allies of the United States, like water in their mouths, scored: they could not agree on toughening the sanctions.

Michael Kofman, a staff member of the Kennan Institute in Washington, ironically: they say, the US president can impose sanctions against Russia, but in Moscow there is no one left who did not satisfy these sanctions - well, except that the Kremlin janitor.

There is simply no place to expand commercial and financial sanctions: the United States has reached the "limit".

You can, of course, strengthen the existing sanctions, but then the world economy will be under threat. Former Director for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia at the National Security Council, Andrew Weiss, explains that the White House is acting extremely cautiously so as not to harm the sanctions of the American and European economies and the global financial system.

In the meantime, analysts are scaring the world community with a likely US-Russia war. And they seem to be inclined to believe that the leaders of the United States, not Russia, are provoking the war.

John Dietrich in edition "American Thinker" makes the following thought: the prediction of war with Russia smacks of panic. Nevertheless, the members of the current Kremlin administration "are following exactly the course that leads to war". Their “warlike policy”, built on a mixture of “deceit and incompetence,” moves in two directions: cyberspace and Syria, the author believes.

The conflict in cyberspace arose as a result of suspicion: the Russians allegedly interfere in the American elections through Wikileaks. However, Russia firmly denies that it is somehow involved in hacking. But America itself did not provide any evidence. Instead, the public was allowed to enjoy the chatter of "intellectual" Joe Biden (vice president). He publicly reported on the possibility of secret cyber attacks against Moscow, after which he was ridiculed.

The following is also interesting here: if Russia is subjected to such cyber attacks, the US will be ... the first suspect. “This is a great opportunity for a party interested in fomenting a conflict between the US and Russia,” the author sums up. “The most important thing is that an attack of this kind will lead to an increase in tension in an already tense relationship.”

As for Syria, the situation is being intensified by Washington: some consultants in the United States, including State Department officials (more than 50 diplomats), advocate direct military action — air strikes against Syrian military bases, warehouses, etc. “These officials support the act war, ”says John Dietrich.

The Russians, in turn, deployed C-300 and C-400 air defense systems in Syria. And they warn that any blow against the Syrian forces "will put Russian personnel at risk."

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is in favor of creating a no-fly zone in Syria. Even Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, criticized her ideas. Speaking to Congress, he said that in order to control the entire airspace, it would be necessary to “go to war against Syria and Russia.”

War is a terrible topic. Therefore, from her back to Mr. Klapper. If such a person as Klapper openly recognizes multipolarity in international relations and is ready to rank not only the United States, but also Russia and China as important and even dominant players in the world, this means that not everyone wants to fight in the United States.

Such an assessment on behalf of the head of the intelligence community hardly involves the outbreak of war. Rather the opposite.

“Clapper’s speech was as realistic as possible,” said "Free Press" Leading expert at the Center for Military-Political Studies MGIMO Mikhail Alexandrov. - Most importantly, he recognized that instead of a bipolar system, a multipolar world is being formed. True, Klapper did not mention that there was still a short period of unipolarity - it lasted 10-15 years - when the United States dominated the planet. But such “forgetfulness” is understandable: otherwise, we would have to admit that America’s role in the world has gone down. ”

According to the expert, the head of the National Intelligence "cools the hot heads in the American elite." Alexandrov recalls that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton spoke in favor of introducing a no-fly zone. But Mr. Klapper warns: in this case, a confrontation with the Russian armed forces is possible, that is, a direct path to the Third World War.

It is also interesting that Klapper says nothing about the expansionist aspirations of Russia, and it was the Americans who “inflated the myth of the Kremlin’s imperial ambitions”. The head of the National Intelligence emphasizes: Russia sees itself as a great power, and therefore Washington should take into account the interests of Moscow.

“This, frankly, is a legitimate demand of Moscow - according to all the canons of political realism. Great powers have their own areas of interest. And they defend these interests. ”


In the United States, we add, the interests of the party of war and the party of peace clashed. That is, not the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, or even some small parties, of which there are a dozen four in the States, namely, those who want to start a world war and earn some money, and those who understand that the era of American dominance is a thing of the past. , and a new war can bury its very entertainers.

Klapper makes statements in the spirit of realpolitik, and Hillary Clinton needs militancy rather for elections than for the actual creation of a no-fly zone in Syria. Obama and Madame Clinton, who worked for several years as Secretary of State, had the opportunity to work on such a zone in Syria (when Russia was not there), but even then it was decided to abandon this idea. In addition, Obama took up the reduction of the military budget of the country due to the extremely swollen public debt. Now, the creation of a no-fly zone is fraught with not only financial costs, but also a clash with Russia - and neither Obama in the last months of his reign, nor Hillary, if she becomes president, will not accept this.

If Hillary wins (by the way, her campaign headquarters and she changed her anger to mercy and adhere to ideas about restoring relations with Russia), then she will most likely try to start something like a new “reset”. It will be fun if Michael McFaul comes to Russia again.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
30 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Knowing
    Knowing 28 October 2016 05: 57
    +5
    Sane man Klepper good , but unfortunately the "fool factor" prevails in the American elite ... recourse And all from impunity.
    1. Finches
      Finches 28 October 2016 09: 35
      +6
      Adequate people understand and appreciate everything on both sides of the ocean! Hillary is a sick and old woman, but a woman - and these creatures, even being one foot in the coffin, are unpredictable, stubborn and have an opinion that is based not on knowledge or life experience ... but exclusively on a momentary surge of some cosmic emotions at the moment time ... laughing
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 30 October 2016 16: 41
        0
        Quote: Finches
        Adequate people understand and appreciate everything on both sides of the ocean! Hillary is a sick and old woman, but a woman - and these creatures, even being one foot in the coffin, are unpredictable, stubborn and have an opinion that is not based on knowledge or life experience.

        - and they decide something? Putin casually said in Valdai about the supranational (read, global) elite - this elite has its own plans, and at the same time do not care about the sanity and adequacy of people on both sides of the big puddle. The trouble is that inadequate people decide, representatives of this very global elite decide. Once, the mother of several representatives of this same elite said that, like, to be a war or peace, my sons decide! Then the sons were small and played war games. Now they have grown, so have toys. So relax and get ready
    2. Thirteenth
      Thirteenth 28 October 2016 10: 57
      +1
      Sorry to get into your thread, but I have an important, burning question, but can we, if something happens, pile America on the soup without using nuclear weapons? Personally, I am sure of this at 146%!
      1. lexx2038
        lexx2038 28 October 2016 11: 49
        +2
        Quote: Thirteenth
        Sorry to get into your thread, but I have an important, burning question, but can we, if something happens, pile America on the soup without using nuclear weapons? Personally, I am sure of this at 146%!

        Well, if it starts, then of course I’ll go, and where to go then, well, if you get up close, then of course we’ll pile on, though we may not return home, but you didn’t ask about that.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. weksha50
        weksha50 28 October 2016 12: 02
        +1
        Quote: Thirteenth
        Sorry to get into your thread, but I have an important, burning question, but can we, if something happens, pile America on the soup without using nuclear weapons? Personally, I am sure of this at 146%!



        Also, I'm sorry ... those ... Why not at 100, 200, 300%, namely at 146?
        Well, if you take into account the fact that our bases were surrounded by the US borders on land, and the fact that our fleet is 2 or even 3 times superior to the US fleet, then you can "pile on cabbage soup" without nuclear weapons ...

        The base nearest to the United States (86 km from Alaska) will appear in Chukotka no earlier than the end of 2017 ... And it is not known what is meant by the word "base" ...
        Here two deputies have already proposed to the State Duma to place our missiles in Cuba in order to "cool the hot American heads" ... Without even asking Cuba itself ...
        They, probably, also had some kind of bad and terrible dream ...
        1. Thirteenth
          Thirteenth 28 October 2016 12: 15
          0
          "given the fact that our bases were surrounded by the US border by land"


          Yeah, and on the land of Russia whose bases are now located? Our fleet is 2, 3, 54 times superior to the American .... Hey, good. Passed in 1905!
          Patriots got a cheer !!!
    3. Sotskiy
      Sotskiy 28 October 2016 14: 52
      +1
      Quote: Knowing
      Unfortunately, the "fool factor" prevails in the American elite ... And all from impunity.

      "Or maybe we will zhahn ?! We will definitely zhahn! The whole world is in dust! But later!" k / f "DMB" soldier laughing
  2. Nitarius
    Nitarius 28 October 2016 06: 21
    +4
    education in the USA fell .. and Clinton MADAME is an example ... she would be on the battlefield .. so that she wouldn’t be in the office and really see the pain .. then she would understand what and how!
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 28 October 2016 09: 11
      +7
      Quote: Nitarius
      and Clinton MADAM an example

      Clinton is not from illiteracy like that, but from the fact that for 20 years now wears a crown of horns, which crowned her hubby. A strong, but humiliated woman is really very dangerous. And I suspect if Hilary comes to the White House, rivers of blood will spill.
  3. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 28 October 2016 06: 31
    +5
    Divide and conquer in action. Now there is a new redistribution of spheres of influence in the world, the Americans are trying to preserve what they grabbed in the period without the USSR and weak Russia, when there was the principle of “take what you can swallow”. Lafa was over for them.
  4. Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 28 October 2016 06: 39
    +6
    The US supports its economy primarily through wars in other countries. They know how to unleash conflicts, while remaining on the sidelines. Most likely, now the United States is developing another strategy and it is unlikely that anyone will stop them. I'm afraid that after the election (no matter who wins) there will be a big shake in the world.
  5. valent45
    valent45 28 October 2016 06: 44
    +2
    America! Do not drive the fool! Stop before it's too late!
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 28 October 2016 06: 56
    +1
    America, do not drive horses: Russians are ready for war.

    The call is certainly good. It just will not be heard for subjective reasons in the first place. But it’s a pity that normal people don’t want war.
  7. Masya masya
    Masya masya 28 October 2016 07: 22
    +5
    In the United States, we add, the interests of the party of war and the party of peace clashed. That is, not the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, or even some small parties, of which there are a dozen four in the States, namely, those who want to start a world war and earn some money, and those who understand that the era of American dominance is a thing of the past. , and a new war can bury its very entertainers.

    When there is no unity in the family,
    And Swan, Cancer, yes Pike take power,
    That begins a complete disgust,
    Such intrigues do not lead to good ...
  8. Senior manager
    Senior manager 28 October 2016 09: 01
    +2
    Dude watched well, sensibly. The senior boss (Lord) will arrange at his discretion. I’ll go as a volunteer to the war with Iya, although I’m retired.
  9. Stinger
    Stinger 28 October 2016 09: 16
    0
    It will be funny if Michael McFaul comes to Russia again.

    It seems that no more amateurs will be sent to Russia. This is not a banana republic. What was convinced of Comrade McFaul, who, having arrived as ambassador, began by distributing cookies to the fighters against the "bloody regime" and teaching democracy. Soon the offended flew out with a bang. Now he lectures. Let him continue reading.
  10. delvin-fil
    delvin-fil 28 October 2016 09: 29
    0
    It will be funny if Michael McFaul comes to Russia again.

    Here we were missing him! request
  11. Wrangel Island
    Wrangel Island 28 October 2016 10: 19
    0
    Russia, with its ruined industry, is far ahead ...
  12. raid14
    raid14 28 October 2016 10: 43
    +2
    All Western analysts do not see beyond their own x, it is clear that the hegemon is losing its former influence and the world is going to a world war.
    If there were good analysts in the USA, then during the EBN we would have lost everything.
    For example: after the collapse of the USSR, it cost them, in the dashing 90s, when "we had no enemies," to offer Russia a place as a full-fledged participant in European security, with joining the NATO bloc. Over time, replace the old cadres in the Armed Forces with "loyal to the regime", gaining control over Russian nuclear weapons and that's it, the enemy's victory without war.
    But the "exceptional" always considered us inferior and could not take the chance.
  13. lexx2038
    lexx2038 28 October 2016 11: 16
    +4
    I looked at the picture and realized that Russia needed a new coat of arms, because everyone always associated Russia with a bear, and we feel ourselves like that, and not some fictional two-headed chimera. We are not birds, and from above we don’t spoil anyone’s head from a great distance, our mentality is face to face, personally and directly, and not through intermediaries out there, with the wrong hands. Isoterics say (even though I don’t perceive them) that the emblem strongly affects the fate of the state. Here the British have a lion, they don’t get food, they have a pride, a new lion kills all the children of others - well, typical English geopolitics. An eagle among fools — it will be all offended, but it will never attack a strong beast alone, a familiar politician, huh? And our two-headed one looks left-right into offshore countries, respects abroad, and beneath it, he does not see his own child.
    I think so.
    1. Galleon
      Galleon 28 October 2016 15: 21
      +3
      The point is not in the associated animal, but in the sacred plan, Russia - the successor of Byzantium - the Orthodox imperial civilization - and this is our essence. And it doesn’t matter that one of us is Great Russian, someone is Tatar, and someone is Caucasian. When we are together - this is our essence.
      If the liberals defeat us, they will erase the two-headed eagle from the coat of arms, this is their goal. But this will not be with our people, but with some other.
  14. Kupez4
    Kupez4 28 October 2016 13: 12
    0
    All the same, BB handsome. In time, he took up the army.
  15. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 28 October 2016 14: 02
    0
    The regional committee remained brains in the 90s / collapse of the USSR /. The "partners" overslept, the train left and it is almost impossible to catch up with it. Russia was and will be !!! the question is open with America.
  16. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 30 October 2016 00: 30
    0
    A dangerous man, James Moriarty ... Read Klapper's biography and compare all provocations with airplanes, including Sakhalin 1983, Donbass 2014, USA 11.09.2001 ... with his posts before and after. And with the stay in the place where something happened. That's what pulled him to Dnepropetrovsk, where the Malaysian board was controlled from and where, according to indirect data, the hedgehog of the catastrophe with air-to-air missiles took off ...
    Important, important disasters. Beneficial only to one country - USA !!! And this is James Moriarty, sorry - Klapper.
  17. Belarus
    Belarus 30 October 2016 16: 24
    +1
    No one in America wants to listen to such adequate people, even if the "former" ones, and will not be at least as long as the "elections" in the United States are taking place. And the fact that America has gone to pieces in relation to opposition to Russia is also evidenced by the fact:
    Iranian Foreign Ministry praises Saudi Arabia's election to UN HRO
    . It’s only a nightmare that one can imagine that in a country where, to put it mildly, one does not have to speak about any rights, they are elected to the UN HRC fool link to the article: http://politobzor.net/show-110966-mid-irana-oceni
    l-izbranie-saudovskoy-aravii-v-spch-oon.html
    .
    Further, probably by the course of the "hole macratic" politicians will be the election of a representative of ISIS to the UN Security Council with veto power.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 30 October 2016 16: 43
      +1
      Quote: Belarus
      in a country in which, to put it mildly, one does not have to speak about any rights, they are elected to the UN HRO



      Although, frankly, it would not hurt for us in Russia to carry out some thieves from the state budget by hanging so that fear would be completely impudent.
      1. Belarus
        Belarus 30 October 2016 17: 13
        +1
        In the short term, this might come down as a measure, but it won’t change the situation, or maybe it will only increase the amount of bribes and increase caution. Those who took it will take their hands to liquidate it, but then they will take it with their feet.
        What to do then ? Yes, anything, but only without officialdom, so to speak, and rationally.
  18. brace
    brace 30 October 2016 20: 40
    0
    The Russian leadership does not have iron eggs, which were the Soviet leadership after the war, and even under Brezhnev there were blinking principles. The behavior of the leadership in relation to Syria, and to Donbas too. I would like to say "..bogatyrs, not you .....".
  19. gladcu2
    gladcu2 31 October 2016 13: 18
    0
    In fact, the situation of confrontation between Russia and the United States is better. Such as at the moment. Well, maybe stop the war in Syria. Which of course is very important.

    Why is confrontation necessary?

    Because there is no trust in Russian officials and oligarchs. As long as they are under sanctions, the Kremlin's janitor should also be under sanctions. The whole world is calm. But as soon as the sanctions are lifted from the oligarchs, the US only promises to accept them into its "elite" clan. Immediately, these will surrender everyone and everything and the Russian Federation.

    There is no trust in the oligarchy of the Russian Federation. And it can’t be. And GDP does not completely control them. Until now, they were controlled by the United States. But according to the rhetoric from the article, the United States will soon begin to carry them into its clan.