Indian HAL launched mass production of new attack helicopters

29
Indian state-owned company Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) announced the start of the serial assembly of the Light Combat Helicopter (LCH) helicopters, reports MIC.

Indian HAL launched mass production of new attack helicopters




To date, built 3 pre-production machines that are being tested in the Indian Air Force. The first flight of the prototype took place in 2010.

According to HAL head Raja Suvarny, “the machines successfully passed a series of flight tests and weapons tests, in particular, they launched unguided rockets and tested the 20-mm automatic cannon.” In addition, guided anti-tank missiles will be tested at the end of the year.

“The LCH helicopter is made according to the classical scheme with tandem crew accommodation. The helicopter cabin is capable of withstanding hits of 12,7-mm armor-piercing bullets, and the chassis is non-removable and energy-absorbing to increase crew safety during an emergency landing. The machine is equipped with two TM333 – 2C2 turboshaft engines with a digital control system of the FADEC type, jointly developed by HAL and Turbomeca, ”the statement reads.



The helicopter is equipped with a sight and sight system located in the nose. Armament - controlled rotary gun caliber 20 mm. Missiles can be mounted on 4's suspension points.

According to the manufacturer, "LCH can reach speeds up to 330 km / h (cruising speed - 260 km / h), can climb to heights up to 6500 m and cover the distance to 700 km."

The Indian Defense Ministry plans to purchase 176 helicopters, of which 64 units are for the Air Force and 114 for the army.
  • indiatimes.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    27 October 2016 11: 03
    that somehow this technique does not inspire confidence !!
    1. +9
      27 October 2016 11: 17
      That's what this comment is about.
      Quote: mig29mks
      that somehow this technique does not inspire confidence !!

      Are you on principle I FIRST shouted from the bushes?
      Do you think the Indian military-industrial complex and the decision-makers in the Indian armed forces are illiterate and stupid?
      And why do you think there is any acceptable explanation for this?
      1. +1
        27 October 2016 11: 24
        Do you think the Indian military-industrial complex and the decision-makers in the Indian armed forces are illiterate and stupid?

        Probably mig29 recalls that the vast majority of aircraft and armored vehicles India buys abroad, so it is so critical. But to judge the quality and characteristics of the helicopter in appearance is certainly wrong.
        1. 0
          27 October 2016 11: 41
          Yes, while it is purchasing. I am forced to do so, but along the way, and is developing its military-industrial complex, the same helicopter confirms this.
          Take Bramos, what does it mean?
          1. +1
            27 October 2016 15: 00
            and does Arjun speak to you about something? and tejdas? what about Akash?
            the fact that the Russians made a rocket to the Hindus does not mean anything.
            By the way, do they even have their own rifles?
        2. 0
          27 October 2016 13: 21
          In appearance, the sighting device is already a pain for ours with the MI-28N, it seems, if I'm mistaken for a correction.
      2. +5
        27 October 2016 11: 34
        they can’t always maintain purchased equipment and keep it running properly! from which they always have problems! And here is your turntable and even combat, well, I don’t know. But at the expense of the bushes it’s not for me-apparently you sit there !!!!)))))))))
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      27 October 2016 11: 40
      Quote: mig29mks
      that somehow this technique does not inspire confidence !!

      and rightly so, too, they somehow bought the parts made by the Indians, they were made so obscene that it turned out to be so expensive with refinement, subsequently they were completely abandoned.
      1. +1
        27 October 2016 12: 01
        Quote: alpamys
        and rightly so, too, they somehow bought the parts made by the Indians, they were made so obscene that it turned out to be so expensive with refinement, subsequently they were completely abandoned.

        - And this is a claim to your effective managers. One and the same Chinese plant sends nuts to Pendoxtan and to Russia - "two big differences," as they say in Odessa. And guess from three times in which direction the quality. wink
        Explain why?
        1. 0
          27 October 2016 14: 59
          Quote: iConst
          Quote: alpamys
          and rightly so, too, they somehow bought the parts made by the Indians, they were made so obscene that it turned out to be so expensive with refinement, subsequently they were completely abandoned.

          - And this is a claim to your effective managers. One and the same Chinese plant sends nuts to Pendoxtan and to Russia - "two big differences," as they say in Odessa. And guess from three times in which direction the quality. wink
          Explain why?

          managers have nothing to do with it, Americans in quality when compared with the Germans are a couple of steps lower, China is even worse, respectively, here the Swiss and Austria are better than the Germans.
    3. +1
      27 October 2016 18: 18
      The glazing of the lantern inspired ...
  2. +2
    27 October 2016 11: 03
    It seems that it was collected from different parts of different helicopters
    1. +1
      27 October 2016 11: 17
      What is the difference between a Hammer wheel and a Ural wheel?
      Quote: fedor13
      It seems that it was collected from different parts of different helicopters
    2. 0
      27 October 2016 11: 19
      Yes, of course it's not a lion-1 lol but seriously for India it’s not very bad.
      1. 0
        27 October 2016 12: 01
        for India this is not very bad.

        What specifically is not bad. Has he already entered the army and received excellent (or good) reviews from combat pilots?
        The first flight of the prototype took place in 2010.

        6 years of experience, and now only report on serial assembly.
  3. +2
    27 October 2016 11: 04
    Well, it remains to be happy for our ally. India A great country, it will not forever buy weapons from us. They have a shaft of minerals, which is missing - they can quickly deliver, technologies are actively developing. Well done.
    1. +1
      27 October 2016 11: 20
      Quote: Ustrushan
      Well, it remains to be happy for our ally.

      That's right. It’s too early to say just about an ally, but the fact that the Indians have been increasingly on our side lately is good. The development of the Indian military-industrial complex and avoiding the purchase of weapons and military equipment from the West is quite a right decision, there will be less opportunity in terms of providing spare parts and other materials for vehicles of Western production.
  4. +3
    27 October 2016 11: 17
    There seems to be no locator in the nose, why put the OPS on top? Judging by the photo, the ball can be brought up at best 45 degrees down, and that under the belly is not visible at all.
  5. 0
    27 October 2016 11: 39
    well, lethalka, really made with an ax, as if it were made of plywood, no, it’s in vain that we contacted the Indians, so at least as much and whatever you want (samples of weapons and technology) they will plow and spoil all one thing, then throw it away and ask for a new one ... "Partners" damn it, but the nose is all the same in the direction of the British looks.
  6. 0
    27 October 2016 11: 45
    Quote: mig29mks
    that somehow this technique does not inspire confidence !!

    ---------------------------
    It looks like a clone of something. As for trust, it’s kind of like a light helicopter is positioned. Do not assign too big tasks to it.
  7. +4
    27 October 2016 11: 47
    Their independent development, by the way.
    Not a licensed copy, and not a "Chinese copy".
    1. +1
      27 October 2016 11: 55
      Is there another car in your photo? and so yes, well done Indians)
    2. 0
      27 October 2016 12: 19
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Their independent development, by the way.
      Not a licensed copy, and not a "Chinese copy".

      The PRC has 2 attack helicopters of its own design at once. And all the systems of the Indian helicopter are "jointly developed".
      But the main thing is not that, but that the first flight of the prototype was in 2010, and there wasn’t any mass production. That is, the helicopter can repeat the fate of Arjun and Tejas.
      1. +1
        27 October 2016 13: 11
        Recently flashed that passed a weapon test.
        And now - like, they are moving from the series.
  8. 0
    27 October 2016 11: 52
    Cool veranda with him) ...
    1. 0
      27 October 2016 12: 59
      Apache also has an attic, but when it hangs at night, the thermal imager works the way our 24s never dreamed of.
  9. +3
    27 October 2016 13: 42
    Something is hard to believe that this showcase can withstand a hit of 12,7
    1. +2
      27 October 2016 15: 45
      Quote: feokot1982
      Something is hard to believe that this showcase can withstand a hit of 12,7

      it may well be that they can, the maximum weight of the engines is 5000 kg *, 2 * 1200, (just half of the Ka-52) falls into such mass-dimensional reservations, the frequent binding of the blister is probably just what indicates the necessary bullet resistance from ammunition 12.7 technologically can only be performed in small areas.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    28 October 2016 16: 57
    "Chitak" from HAL "grew" and overgrown with armor and pendants. Progress, however.
    Interesting: what avionics?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"