Rocket artillery "sword"

46
Soon after the adoption of the Kortik anti-aircraft missile and artillery complex (ZRAK), developed in the Tula KBP and intended for self-defense of ships, work on the subject of combined anti-aircraft installations was continued. The Instrument Design Bureau went along the path of modernization of the already established complex (Kortik-M and Kortik-MO), and in the Moscow Design Bureau of Precision Engineering named after A.E. Nudelman began to work on their own project SURF, called "Palash".

Rocket artillery "sword"


The first reports on the development of the Palash appeared in the 1994 year, then for some time the information appeared in extremely scarce quantities. However, already in 97-m, the approximate appearance of the future anti-aircraft complex, or rather its gun part, became known - eight guided missiles and two 30-mm six-barreled guns. In the middle of the 2000-ies, the prototype of the Palash went to the field tests conducted at the “30 facility” in the Crimea. In the autumn of 2005, at the end of the firing range, the combat module of the anti-aircraft complex (index 3Р89) was sent to Sevastopol, where it was installed on the SRX No. 13 on the P-60 rocket boat. The ship tests of the Palace "Palash" lasted until the 2007 year. It should be noted that in the test sites and ship tests only firing from machine guns was carried out - the Sosna-R missiles were not ready by that time. In December of the same year, the complex was put into service, namely, into trial operation. In addition, it was planned to install the “Dummy” on the second boat, the P-239, but for a number of reasons, mostly financial ones, the P-60 remained alone.



With its layout, the ZRAK "Broadsword" in some way resembles its predecessor, "Dagger". The same massive base and AO-18 assault rifles and missile transport and launch containers located on the sides. However, "Broadsword" has a different guidance system, which also had a certain effect on the appearance. In the upper part of the 3P89 combat module, the Shar optical-location control station is located, closed by a spherical casing. Because of this detail, the entire combat module bears some resemblance to robots military purpose from some feature films, which was immediately noted by many lovers of military equipment. The Shar station includes a television-optical station with a television and thermal imaging channel, a laser rangefinder and an anti-aircraft missile control system. Also, at the very beginning of work on the Broadsword, it was planned to supplement the complex with a radar station located in a separate building. But so far, the radar has not been completed, it has not participated in the tests, and there can be no talk of adopting it into service. Thus, only the Shar station is used for detection and guidance, but some sources claim that the Broadsword automation can receive data from the carrier ship's own radars. Without the use of radar data, the Shar OLSU is capable of detecting and launching a missile at a target located within ± 178 ° in azimuth and from -20 ° to +82 in elevation. In this case, keeping the target on tracking is ensured at its angular velocity up to 50 deg / s. The maximum range determined by the laser rangefinder is 20 km, while taking the target for auto tracking can occur at shorter distances: from 16 km for an aircraft, 10 for a helicopter, and about 8-10 for a cruise missile. However, in most cases, reliable detection and tracking of a target is possible only at a distance of 6 km.



Artillery SIGN "Palash" consists of two automatic guns caliber 30 mm AO-18KD. They differ from the previous modifications by a longer barrel (80 gauges) and, as a result, better projectile ballistics. The aimed range of the guns is from 200 to 4000 meters, and the rate of fire is up to 5000 rounds per minute on the machine gun (total - up to 10 thousand). Palash artillery can effectively hit targets flying at speeds up to 300 m / s at altitudes up to 3 km. The reaction time of an artillery installation, according to Tochmash Design Bureau, is 5-7 seconds. Ammunition of machines - up to 1500 shells. The ammunition feeder is a chainless auger. AO-18KD can use the following types of shells:
- BPTS. Armor-piercing piercing projectile with a hard-alloy core (alloy of a residence permit). There is a tracer. Intended, first of all, to undermine the warhead of a fired cruise missile;
- OFZS. High-explosive fragmentation projectile;
- UTS. Fragmentation projectile equipped with a tracer.



As already mentioned, at the time of testing of the complex, the Sosna-R rocket (GRAU index 9М337), being developed by Tochmash Design Bureau, has not yet been brought up to the appropriate standard. Therefore, in the existing photos of the Palash with TPK missiles, the latter are either mock-ups or the result of photomontage. For this reason, the missile specifications declared by the design bureau will be given below. With the length and mass of TPK in 2390 mm and 36-39 kg (data vary in different sources), respectively, the rocket can hit aerodynamic targets at distances from 1300 meters. The maximum target range of the Pine-P target is 8 km in the case of airplanes or 4 km when working on anti-ship missiles. A missile is aimed at a target with a laser using the appropriate node of the Shar station. The stated accuracy of pointing is up to 15 angular seconds. During the flight to the target, the Pine-P can maneuver with transverse overload to 52 and longitudinal to 40 units. The maximum speed and altitude of the target at which the rocket can effectively hit it, is 700 m / s and 2-3500 m, respectively. Warhead rocket high-explosive fragmentation with 12-channel laser contactless fuse. Its total weight - 5 kilogram.

Module OESU "Shar" ZRAK "Palash"


In addition to the “Palash” variant, an export version of the anti-aircraft complex called “Palma” has been developed. From the original modification, it differs in the composition of the equipment and versions. At the request of the customer, "Palma" can be made in several versions:
- Complete set: combat module (up to four on one ship), radar and station "Ball";
- only the combat module (can be completed with the OLSU "Ball") with rocket and artillery weapons;
- only the combat module (can be completed with the OLSU "Ball") with rocket armament;
- Only the combat module (can be completed with the OLSU "Ball") with artillery weapons;
- container modification. It is intended for use on unprepared ships, for example, on civilian vessels converted for military use.



In the Russian Navy Navy ZRAK "Broadsword" at the moment is available in only one instance - on a missile boat R-60. Nothing is known about equipping the Broadsword with other ships, however, in the light of the protracted development of the missile for the complex, it is hardly worth building optimistic plans about the fate of the entire complex.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    18 January 2012 09: 18
    Good machine!
    1. dimaivin
      0
      24 May 2013 01: 40
      good current continue to put a dagger or chestnut junk it is not clear why
    2. 0
      22 February 2017 19: 49
      at the sight of the Broadsword, I remembered a robot from Oblivion
  2. +3
    18 January 2012 09: 22
    Great stuff ... winked
  3. Igor
    +9
    18 January 2012 09: 27
    You should have put such a thing on the "Terminator" or on a smaller BMP and call such a machine "The Butcher".
    1. 0
      18 January 2012 12: 53
      Here I agree to all 1000% and I always wonder why they do not put this beast on the armor technique?
      1. Kazak_30
        +3
        18 January 2012 14: 12
        Why such a rate of fire for the tracks? And the ammunition will not take much and bestowal will be, God forbid! But the idea is good!
      2. SSK
        SSK
        0
        5 March 2013 23: 50
        The answer is simple - the sound pressure (shot) of such a "machine" can not withstand every unit (device, soldier). There is no one on the ship inside the "car", but put it on an armored personnel carrier - after trying the first salvo it will just turn it over!
    2. mox
      mox
      +2
      18 January 2012 21: 59
      What for?
      There will be no "Shell" or "Tunguska" feather.
  4. +6
    18 January 2012 09: 37
    A good "cyborg" ... but just as it started recently, it has not been completed in a piece copy either ... Let Rogozin drive specific brakes-performers and massively into the troops this very sustems ..., otherwise it has been a quarter of a century already before real implementation ...
    PS Well, maybe the marine version of the Shell is a brake on its implementation ???
    1. ISO
      ISO
      +2
      19 January 2012 10: 01
      It is not known who it is necessary to bend among the performers. This is our birthmark since Soviet times. I am familiar with the products of VPO TOCHMASH (though of a different nomenclature) and not much with the situation at the plant. Workers are paid 10-20 tyrs, designers also do not fatten in the country for a general drop in the quality of components, so asking semi-dead employees for constructing and assembling products from what suppliers were able to get by and large isn’t anything.
  5. +9
    18 January 2012 10: 02
    Kortik has always had missile problems. The complex does not have time to effectively use them simultaneously with the cannons. On corvettes of the "Guarding" type, the missiles were removed from the "Kortika".

    It's the same here. Missiles are absent on the real prototype of the Broadsword.
  6. Igor
    0
    18 January 2012 10: 08
    Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
    Kortik has always had missile problems. The complex does not have time to effectively use them simultaneously with the cannons. On corvettes of the "Guarding" type, the missiles were removed from the "Kortika". The same thing here. There are no missiles on the real Broadsword prototype

    This is due to vibration when firing cannons, Pindos also have rockets separately.
    1. +1
      18 January 2012 12: 07
      And rightly so, if possible, it is better to distribute the means of destruction, so that when one installation is defeated, there is nothing left to shoot
      1. 0
        19 January 2012 22: 43
        In principle, guidance tools are also better to separate ...
        Because machine in a single copy, it is unlikely that someone seriously tested it for reliability ...
        When firing an artillery unit, a strong vibration is likely to occur, which will inevitably affect the reliability of the "Ball".

        If you put a similar device on the tracks, then such a hybrid may make sense. But it is much better to put a discrete complex on the ship, separately rockets, separately quick-firing guns, a separate guidance post.
        1. +1
          20 January 2012 01: 10
          Dear, I do not agree with you. The guidance post should be mounted in a single module with the guns - world practice. Russian AK-630, despite the excellent ballistics, is seriously inferior in accuracy due to the poor location of the guidance post.

          As for the missiles - there should be a separate air defense system module with its own separate guidance post.
  7. Ion coaelung
    +1
    18 January 2012 11: 14
    SKINET is not asleep, Columbia Pichers negodue !!!
    1. L. konstantin
      0
      18 January 2012 11: 33
      Yes, just like from a movie terminator! STILL ON A TRACKED PLATFORM AND A COPY!
  8. sahha
    +1
    18 January 2012 12: 03
    If this fool is put on a caterpillar platform, then I think that the platform
    from recoil it will fly further than the shells themselves.
  9. 0
    18 January 2012 13: 12
    It looks somewhat awkward, but has tremendous firepower.
  10. - = 999 = -
    0
    18 January 2012 15: 28
    AAAaa! HEY! shaitan of machines.
  11. -1
    18 January 2012 15: 56
    2,5 tons of iron per second spits, did I calculate correctly?
    how much ammunition weight is needed?
    1. Grin
      0
      18 January 2012 21: 40
      no, it’s not right according to your calculations, only the weight of bullets is 17 tons)) without taking into account the weight of shells and gunpowder, as far as I remember with such systems, something about 16 kg per second flies out or in a volley (2-3 sec)
      1. 0
        19 January 2012 06: 11
        exactly confused I confused minutes with seconds wink
  12. 755962
    0
    18 January 2012 16: 34
    A folder, they say the barge is cut in half. The article was the previous one below.
  13. Sleptsoff
    0
    18 January 2012 16: 46
    Handsome man! Is there a video with him?
  14. -2
    18 January 2012 20: 13
    A good unit for cutting enemy ships!
    1. +1
      19 January 2012 22: 49
      Yeah ... only the enemy ship should stand on board in ten cable ones and wait for it to be cut! :)

      Where to get such opponents? ;)
  15. marauder
    +1
    18 January 2012 21: 06
    maybe instead of Lada, is it better to let them out?
  16. Strabo
    +2
    18 January 2012 21: 41
    and if the program crashes, what can be made there manually? Something is doubtful all this ..
  17. +1
    18 January 2012 23: 22
    Somehow it is not clear why fragmentation or high-explosive fragmentation shells are still used here? It seems clear that armor-piercing (kinetic) ones with a tungsten core or depleted uranium are much more effective. The core of depleted uranium also has the advantage that it has a strong pyrophoric effect (it is, as it were, "armor-piercing incendiary").

    Since they are developing a new system, they would do it immediately under a new projectile of increased power (with a longer sleeve).

    And, in my opinion, indeed, it is better to rocket separately, and guns separately.
    Doing two things at once is not the best way to achieve efficiency.
    1. ISO
      ISO
      -1
      19 January 2012 10: 08
      With a tungsten core, shot shells can not be collected, unlike uranium shells. Pindos in Iraq left a bunch of dough for collecting their uranium shells. wink Although, of course, solving the problem of tailings of enrichment plants in this way is attractive
      1. 0
        20 January 2012 20: 18
        after firing from a ship, it is unlikely that something will need to be collected ... from the bottom of the sea, then;)
        and it’s not so radioactive, to be honest ... its chemical toxicity significantly exceeds the danger of radiation from it :)
    2. +1
      20 January 2012 01: 11
      Window dressing guys window dressing
    3. +1
      24 January 2012 17: 26
      try to get a purely armor-piercing projectile into a cruise missile, even if you get there will be a 30mm hole. high explosive smash target
  18. Capt.stryker
    +6
    19 January 2012 14: 25
    Quote: Igorek
    You should have put such a thing on the Terminator or on the BMP

    Quote: L. Konstantin
    STILL ON A TRACKED PLATFORM AND A COPY!
    This is not possible in principle, because water is required to cool the trunks, there is no problem with this on ships.
    1. 0
      22 January 2012 14: 51
      Tunguska somehow works without cooling with seawater.
  19. suharev-52
    +2
    20 January 2012 00: 54
    Yes! Good! Well, what else to say.
    Get the enemy in your slaughter yari.
    Nice car, but again
    We have it in a single copy.
  20. sealord
    +1
    20 January 2012 17: 45
    Engineering - design work - gut! 2,4 m trunk - optimal.
    Remained our unforgettable concerns for the implementation, completion, refinement,
    those. hopeless struggle with big bosses, etc. "Russian misfortunes".
    Kab their cholera !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    PS all the ammunition in 10 seconds - for the ship, not enough!
    1. 0
      22 January 2012 14: 53
      all ammunition for 10 sec - for the ship, not enough!
      Everything with this is normal. On the American Phalanx, the tape is also 750 shots - then reload manually
      1. sealord
        +1
        23 January 2012 11: 26
        If Amer has profaned their complex, it does not mean that they need to be compared with them. 1500 is normal for a container variant, but not enough for a stationary ship!
  21. Capt.stryker
    +5
    23 January 2012 12: 09
    Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
    On the American Phalanx, the tape is also 750 shots - then reload manually

    You are wrong. On the "phalanx" 1550 shots. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phalanx_CIWS
    1. sealord
      +1
      23 January 2012 12: 35
      Of course, during the operation had to increase ammunition. The early 80s system!
  22. Capt.stryker
    +3
    23 January 2012 14: 35
    Quote: sealord
    Of course, during the operation had to increase ammunition. The early 80s system!
    The basic model of this complex had an ammunition load of 950-980 rounds, I don’t remember exactly, but not 750.
    1. sealord
      +1
      23 January 2012 15: 38
      In the late 70s, in the journal "Foreign Military Review" I read about this Volcano-Falanx. In those days, reading was not more interesting! And schA - Internet - happiness.
      The fact is that the ship needs more ammunition. Like ours: 2000 for one "turntable".
  23. Artist
    -1
    25 January 2012 12: 16
    That would be such a thing to put on a caterpillar move and give for air defense.
  24. Mad robot
    0
    3 March 2012 22: 11
    Outwardly resembles a "security terminator" from the movie Terminator 4 smile
  25. cobra
    +1
    16 October 2012 01: 13
    The "Kortik" was not supposed to work simultaneously with rockets and cannons. At first, rockets worked on the far border of the affected area, and then the guns entered into action. A broadsword is wasted money, cut clean water. The dagger was built back in Soviet times and included an 8 mm range locator. And all the optics and lasers are useless when setting up a smoke screen. The dagger was placed on Peter the Great. But as is often the case, the high authorities decided in their own way and began to develop an almost analogue, but it turned out to be a much weaker complex. Leads to sad thoughts
  26. 0
    April 16 2013 13: 26
    Eh ... Worked in KBTM from 90 to 97 years after college. The supports right and left, the upper brackets and the third support of the receiver unit are mine.
  27. 0
    April 16 2013 13: 29
    Quote: cobra
    Broadsword is a waste of money, cut clean water. The dagger was built back in Soviet times, it included a locator of the 8 mm range. And all optics and lasers are useless when setting a smoke screen. Dirk put on Peter the Great. But as often happens, the high authorities judged in their own way and began to develop a practically analogue, but it turned out to be a much weaker complex. Suggests sad thoughts


    Brad.
  28. 0
    April 16 2013 13: 29
    Quote: cobra
    Broadsword is a waste of money, cut clean water. The dagger was built back in Soviet times, it included a locator of the 8 mm range. And all optics and lasers are useless when setting a smoke screen. Dirk put on Peter the Great. But as often happens, the high authorities judged in their own way and began to develop a practically analogue, but it turned out to be a much weaker complex. Suggests sad thoughts


    Delirium
  29. 0
    25 July 2020 11: 53
    Not the professionalism and personal preferences of the author of the Military Review is simply off scale.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"