Iraqi government forces have lost the next M1A1M Abrams near Mosul

86
Messenger of Mordovia He published photographs that captured the hit in the МХNUMXА1М Abrams tank of a guided missile fired by IG fighters near Mosul.

Iraqi government forces have lost the next M1A1M Abrams near Mosul




Having walked behind the rear of an Iraqi tank, militants fired an anti-tank missile at it. “ATGM got into the stern of the combat vehicle, in the tower, where the shells are stored. After a powerful explosion, details rose into the air tankApparently, the so-called tower kick-off panels, ”the publication says.





After a moment, intense burning began, the flame rose to a height of more than 10 meters.



After such damage, the tank is unlikely to be taken to recover. "As for the fate of the crew, the Americans have repeatedly stated that, thanks to the complete isolation of the ammunition, tankers have a great chance to survive even in such a seemingly critical situation," the newspaper notes.



However, there is one "but" - if the curtains separating the crew from the ammunition, were opened, the tankers, most likely, were killed. No information on this yet.
  • https://www.youtube.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    25 October 2016 14: 01
    So there is a video.
    1. +9
      25 October 2016 14: 04
      Quote: Monos
      So there is a video.

      Thank! Added a video to the news
      1. +4
        25 October 2016 18: 37
        Quote: fantast
        Thank! Added a video to the news

        At your service, colleague. hi
        1. +1
          25 October 2016 21: 08
          wanted to squeeze the IG into Syria and it’s how it turns out smile
          screen with GA
          link to Sky News Arabia.
          http://www.skynewsarabia.com/web/article/886575/و
          صول-ألف-داعشي-الموصل-ومخاوف-استخدام-الكيماوي
    2. +9
      25 October 2016 14: 59
      Video of tests of knockout panels. But here it seems they did not help.
      1. 0
        26 February 2024 23: 10
        I think that if the tower remains unbroken, the temperature inside will be 300 degrees.
  2. +56
    25 October 2016 14: 01
    sorry the crew was Iraqi.
    I would have liked it more if he were "native".
    1. +5
      25 October 2016 15: 06
      Mattress-striped partners instead of their crews send cheap cannon fodder.

      It's a shame for the Iraqis.

      But, as you see, the training of mattress-striped crews also does not shine - in a similar situation, the result of the attack will be one to one.
    2. PAM
      0
      25 October 2016 19: 03
      something is inaudible on the recording "Allah I'm in the bar"
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +6
    25 October 2016 14: 03
    Pioneer bonfire? Judging by the video, the ATGM calculations are well trained, they know the weaknesses.
    1. +21
      25 October 2016 14: 48
      The weakest spot was in the tank, between the seat and the control levers, because leaving the tank without cover in open space is a clinic.
      1. +5
        25 October 2016 15: 33
        leave the tank without cover in open space is a clinic.

        Citizens, and that doesn’t allow you to read texts? Is religion really?
        Quote: article
        Passing from the rearstanding on the position of an Iraqi tank, the militants fired ...
        1. +1
          25 October 2016 15: 41
          Quote: Hedgehog
          leave the tank without cover in open space

          Apparently not just me)
        2. +3
          31 October 2016 13: 45
          Quote: Hedgehog
          Citizens, and that doesn’t allow you to read texts? Is religion really?
          Quote: article
          Having outflanked the rear of an Iraqi tank, the militants fired ...


          Anyway, SECURITY.

          Position? How long is it?
          Dig a car so that one tower sticks out, was it too lazy?
          Remember the sensational video with the entry of ATGMs (by the way Amer production) in the Syrian T-90 ... Then nothing happened. Although the carelessness of the Syrians went through the roof.
    2. +1
      25 October 2016 16: 33
      Quote: Primipilus
      Pioneer bonfire? Judging by the video, the ATGM calculations are well trained, they know the weaknesses.

      It seems ... And in combination with the amount of weapons stockpiled in Mosul, this is not the last burned tank.
    3. 0
      26 October 2016 13: 55
      Quote: Primipilus
      Judging by the video, the ATGM calculations are well trained, they know the weaknesses.

      So a significant part of the IS commanders is the Iraqi military trained in Soviet schools, so they know how to burn Abrams, and the experience is already great in this matter after the wars of the 90s and 2003 ..
  5. +3
    25 October 2016 14: 10
    The Iraqi army is fighting on the wrong tank, tanks must be bought from us
    1. +3
      26 October 2016 11: 14
      You might think ours wouldn’t blow it up.
      1. +4
        31 October 2016 13: 52
        Quote: Scalpel
        You might think ours wouldn’t blow it up.


        I refer you to my previous comment.

        Remember the sensational video with the entry of ATGMs (by the way Amer production) in the Syrian T-90 ... Then nothing happened. Although the carelessness of the Syrians went through the roof.
  6. +12
    25 October 2016 14: 13
    There was a whole alley of Contests and Bassoons. This is only a small and most likely the most insignificant loss ...
    1. +10
      25 October 2016 14: 14
      And further. In general, they have blocked up to 10 units of equipment in one area
  7. +7
    25 October 2016 14: 14
    That is, I strongly doubt the surviving crew, with such a burning intensity, although of course everything can be.
    1. +1
      26 October 2016 18: 02
      to be honest, I’m also very doubtful - the temperature there is too high - if the crew is inside then it will not burn out and your nose will not stick out. even if the gate valves were closed
  8. +2
    25 October 2016 14: 15
    Didn’t the Iraqis attach infantry units to the tanks to guard them from the rear?
    1. +7
      25 October 2016 14: 17
      Attached. But they are also burned ...
  9. +16
    25 October 2016 14: 16
    When the old, and even export modifications of the t-72 burned in Iraq during the first war, some individuals immoderately burnt at Abrams.
    The situation is mirrored, not the most recent modifications of the Abrams under the control of the same Iraqis are burning cheerfully and provocatively, the more or less fresh T-90 keeps ATGMs.
    Although arguing all right, it's still Merkava's best tank, and ATGM Spike lol
    1. +25
      25 October 2016 14: 27
      Quote: demiurg
      When the old, and even export modifications of the t-72 burned in Iraq during the first war, some individuals immoderately burnt at Abrams.

      Not just fapali, but furiously and squatting down. They say that the ancient soviet crafts will never compare with the creations of the great land of elves. And when the photos of the burnt "Abrams" went, the apologists great abrams attributed their loss to a random extremely unfortunate combination of circumstances.

      The crisis of the "cult of Abrams" began not even from Iraq, but from Yemen "solo on" Bassoon "when it suddenly became clear that even the old Soviet ATGM in competent hands was burning the Abram head-on.
      Quote: demiurg
      The situation is mirrored, not the most recent modifications of the Abrams under the control of the same Iraqis are burning cheerfully and provocatively, the more or less fresh T-90 keeps ATGMs.

      The Iraqis were given a T-72 - they were on fire with them.
      The Iraqis were given "Abrams" - they burn.

      Maybe something needs to be corrected at the conservatory? ©
      1. +7
        25 October 2016 14: 45
        Quote: Alexey RA
        The Iraqis were given "Abrams" - they burn.

        So in the hands of the Americans, these same Abrams in Iraq burned.
        1. +1
          25 October 2016 21: 14
          In both cases, Iraqis played the bassoon. By the way, if the officers, then also with education from us.
      2. +4
        25 October 2016 14: 52
        In this perspective, a missile entering any tank that is not equipped with a KAZ is lethal.
        1. 0
          25 October 2016 22: 06
          It is hardly lethal, KAZ is dangerous for military outposts, without a combat guard, a tank is a coffin, a hot coffin, therefore the tank must be under the DZ, for example, the T-90 from the TOU received a direct hit and ...., and then went "being treated "and after doing his duty to his second homeland, the T-72 in the Chechen one, he completed the task, having received 24 hits and under his own power to the base, this paints the tank.
    2. +22
      25 October 2016 14: 48
      Quote: demiurg
      the best tank Merkava

      Burns longer?
      1. +4
        25 October 2016 15: 19
        Quote: adma
        Burns longer?

        As uv. M.N. Svirin
        All tanks are equally filthy, and the best of them is the one at hand.
      2. +3
        25 October 2016 16: 21
        Quote: adma
        Quote: demiurg
        the best tank Merkava

        Burns longer?

        Warmer ... laughing
    3. 0
      26 October 2016 11: 20
      The main tank destroyers of Hussein were Bradley with ATGMs, Apaches and A-10. The Abrams were not particularly distinguished.
  10. +2
    25 October 2016 14: 28
    Something I'm in doubt that the crew survived such a fire. Ammo, when you throw in fire, they shoot, I wonder if 120mm unitary shells also shoot a shell in a fire?
    1. +6
      25 October 2016 14: 44
      The network has already managed to look frame-by-frame: at 12 second in a burst of smoke it can be seen that the tower with the gun flies forward and falls to the ground.
  11. +11
    25 October 2016 14: 42
    The charges burned out - this is a "big flame" (with splashes of metal) for the first few seconds. Further, perhaps, the fuel was already burning. And there are a lot of tanks, in fact. I'm interested in something else: WHO is around whom?
    1. +1
      25 October 2016 14: 59
      They themselves cannot determine. They played like in childhood: fall, I hit you! -No, I got
    2. +2
      25 October 2016 16: 40
      Quote: AlexTires
      I’m interested in something else: WHO does anyone surround there?

      This is the main question. Just like that, they walked around from the rear, approached 150 meters, and gasped. How so?
      1. 0
        25 October 2016 22: 15
        the approach speed of the ATGM was about 15-19 seconds, this is approximately the full range of 4-4.5 km, but even if even so, the advancing tanks were going along the western one, "pig"
  12. +3
    25 October 2016 14: 54
    If only they would put a smoke screen and carry out art training on the front edge of the defense with an air blast ... or how Kappelevtsy are in a row without a drum ...
  13. +1
    25 October 2016 14: 55
    The crew is, of course, a pity, and such a death causes only sympathy .... But the abram burns, of course, almost no worse than the rest of the racially infidels ... ))) ...
  14. +1
    25 October 2016 14: 56
    I hate ov. But! Watch carefully. ATGM clearly hits the top of the stern, and obviously there is a fire in the fuel tank and engine. There is no bk explosion. But the crew still pendyr.
    1. +1
      25 October 2016 15: 05
      Under the aft of the tower kmk he hits. I’m not sure that the solarium there will be so fun to burn.
      1. +1
        25 October 2016 15: 10
        Nothing that Abrashka’s engine is a gas turbine?
        1. +1
          25 October 2016 15: 18
          So what? At 10 meters will it blaze or something, besides so long?
          1. +1
            25 October 2016 22: 19
            GTE on kerosene, and kerosene is the upper fraction when oil is boiled, then it’s the same flammable liquor, and the mother’s flammable flammable liquid burns, and if you catch water with water !!!, the norms are in the tower niche, then don’t go to the tank, that's all the rest later
        2. KCA
          0
          25 October 2016 16: 19
          and that’s why they like to stop in the middle of the desert and substitute fillet parts for RPGs and ATGMs
    2. 0
      25 October 2016 15: 06
      Come on! Expert!
  15. 0
    25 October 2016 15: 00
    Burn, burn clearly, in vain
       I believed, and my heart hurts.
       Burn, burn clear, life is so beautiful
       But without you the light does not burn.
  16. 0
    25 October 2016 15: 10
    It looks like the warriors were still in Abrams! To bother in the middle of the desert to let in the calculation of ATGM! A thousand times, no 100500 times the rights of the most respected Lavrov! D ...., b ...!
    1. 0
      25 October 2016 15: 56
      Well, Lavrov did not sit there. Russia needs him in the Foreign Ministry, and not in the tank.
  17. +3
    25 October 2016 15: 13
    Now I have reviewed the video several times, the tower has definitely jumped, which means the knockout panels did not help and the crew most likely turned into "wallpaper" for this tank.
    I was wrong in the previous topic, writing that the kick panels worked properly and saved the car and crew ...
  18. +3
    25 October 2016 15: 23
    There is one highlight here, without NATO information support (and all of their equipment is integrated into the combined-arms command system by default) the abrams are blind like moles. For any tank without dynamic protection, the strike is fatal. And it does not matter when and by whom it was made.
  19. +2
    25 October 2016 15: 24
    Most likely Abrams got his native TOU into an auxiliary power unit, which is located just behind the tower.
    1. +1
      25 October 2016 16: 07
      Quote: Trouble
      Most likely Abrams got his native TOU into an auxiliary power unit, which is located just behind the tower.

      TOW so does not smoke in flight, the rocket is clearly Russian.
      1. 0
        25 October 2016 22: 18
        On Abrams "Cornet" was launched.
      2. +1
        25 October 2016 22: 58
        see how TOU smokes when T-90 grumbled to no avail, smokes TOU and how
  20. +1
    25 October 2016 15: 42
    Comrades! I want to remind you that there are differences between the barmales in Mosul and the barmales in Alepo that are visible only to Americans! Therefore, your enthusiasm is a little out of place. hi
    1. +5
      26 October 2016 00: 34
      Quote: engineer74
      Comrades! I want to remind you that there are differences between the barmales in Mosul and the barmales in Alepo that are visible only to Americans!

      There is a difference. The Russian Federation wets the barmalei grown by someone (well, understandable by whom), and the United States wets the barmalei grown by themselves. And when the barmalei bite those who created them - it is funny and joyful because in fact, the barmalei terrorists are fighting the world terrorist No. 1 ... This is such a zagagulin
  21. +5
    25 October 2016 15: 48
    Yes, let all the American military equipment burn, like this tank in the video! Maybe then it would be calmer on the earth!
    1. 0
      25 October 2016 15: 58
      Any technique burns. Kerry or am I or Putin or YOU interested in this tank?
      1. +1
        25 October 2016 19: 06
        Are you kidding!
        This is an American technique, and it is known to all fighters with the regime that it cannot burn in principle.
        .... Imagine. if it was our domestic, even T-72.
        What a howl would rise about that. that everything is lost.
        And so - nothing. Say, what can you do, any technique burns, breaks ....
  22. +4
    25 October 2016 15: 58
    Quote: just EXPL
    sorry the crew was Iraqi.
    I would have liked it more if he were "native".

    The native crew would be covered by three tanks with Iraqis, helicopters in the sky. And then you never know what.
  23. 0
    25 October 2016 16: 05
    Quote: Vladimir 38
    The Iraqi army is fighting on the wrong tank, tanks must be bought from us

    Yes, which do not give them, the result will be equally negative. the tank is not a camel, it poorly overlooks the mighty sand warriors, moody yes ..
  24. 0
    25 October 2016 16: 33
    I love such news.
  25. 0
    25 October 2016 17: 32
    Interestingly, in tactical exercises, tank crews no longer teach how to track ATGM calculations ??? Especially on even terrain, this is easier to do ... especially on Abrams where the detection means are very good ...
  26. -1
    25 October 2016 19: 03
    Quote: shinobi
    For any tank without dynamic defense, a ptur strike is fatal. It does not matter when and by whom it was made.

    Well, that is, the tank is "the best in the world", just an unfortunate set of circumstances?
    There was no dynamic protection. It happens.
  27. 0
    25 October 2016 19: 33
    No, guys, Democrats, I was taught that any technique, even the most advanced, can always be destroyed. Hence the saying "technology is in the hands of a savage heap of metal." And the tankers will forgive me, but I was taught to destroy any tanks, and not only foreign ones. I still remember all the vulnerable spots for firing shells, ATGMs, and RPGs at them. How many people know that anti-tank shells (mines) can be lowered by parachute on top of the turret at a distance of more than 10 km from the gun if there is a spotter? And the most dangerous thing for us was the ordinary infantry covering the vehicle. Without security, the tank became a "cardboard" target. And nuka, tankers, remind me of the size of the dead zones. Especially the rear ones. And here in the ass is not frail ATGM ... So what do you all want from poor Abrams?
    1. 0
      25 October 2016 19: 49
      Israeli Spike hits from above ...
      1. 0
        25 October 2016 22: 28
        the spike does not work without laser illumination, and the laser illumination is an autonomous activation of the Curtain, so where the spike will hit when the Curtain is activated is unknown, most likely as "into a white light like a pretty penny"
    2. 0
      25 October 2016 22: 37
      So what do you all want from poor Abrams?

      not only the Abrams is poor, but all the Natev tanks that have turret niches with ammunition tanks, no matter how the "carousel" of our tanks, but the carousel is in the zone of mandatory crew protection, and the given protection saved the crew more than once, and the turret niche of western tanks, yes, at least 100 mm of armor, apply all one in tandem, it will be sewn
  28. +2
    25 October 2016 20: 57
    Excellent on fire! I would endlessly admire how abrams burn. And the corrupt Iraqis who surrendered their country to the Yankees for 30 pieces of silver, I absolutely do not mind. If you wanted democracy, get it ... and sign it with your blood and your loved ones. Still, we would have to bring all our home-grown liberals to Iraq so that they feel in their own skin what kind of American democracy they are so hungry for. By the way, didn’t you notice that the bandits didn’t call the allu this time?
  29. +1
    25 October 2016 21: 00
    Pay attention to the video, why after a hit no one screams at Alah Akbar, very unusual and immediately catches the eye.
    1. +1
      25 October 2016 21: 30
      [i] [/ i]
      Quote: gammipapa
      Pay attention to the video, why after a hit no one screams at Alah Akbar, very unusual and immediately catches the eye.

      So the operator was with CNN.
      1. 0
        25 October 2016 22: 31
        not, if it would be with senene or bebese, then they would squeal b "maygod, maygod" - this is their custom
        1. +1
          26 October 2016 05: 47
          Really RT? Although e5 was also not heard .....
  30. 0
    25 October 2016 23: 39
    It burns beautifully))
  31. +3
    26 October 2016 05: 39
    You can probably look at 3 things endlessly: how the American flags are lowered (torn down), how the Americans look for diapers and how Abrams burns ... laughing
  32. 0
    26 October 2016 06: 22
    Dear! Do not explain what kind of things these are - EXTERNAL PANELS? (current without mockery, well, I'm not special on tanks ...)
    1. 0
      26 October 2016 08: 37
      You are clearly not a liberal ... Maybe google, info completely)
  33. 0
    26 October 2016 11: 24
    And it seemed to me that in the last seconds of shooting, when it was already burning, it turned to the left ..
  34. 0
    26 October 2016 17: 51
    I will not gloat, because the tank was essentially doing the right thing ...
  35. +1
    28 October 2016 08: 28
    but where is the infantry cover for such cases and why are they there to take into account it is not clear
  36. 0
    26 February 2024 23: 05
    Quote: Kars
    testing of kickout panels

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"