Just no money

39


Over the past 20 years, the United States has unleashed so many armed conflicts that one can only compare with a disaster film. Obviously, the operator has a desire to continue shooting bloody episodes around the world, but, unfortunately, for him (and fortunately for the rest) the director’s budget is not rubber.



One of the main trump cards that Barack Obama actively used in the presidential race 2008 of the year, was the accusation of George W. Bush of unreasonable spending of budget funds. As it turned out, the current head of the White House turned out to be an even bigger stranger than its predecessor: in 8 years, the US national debt increased from 70% to 115% of the gross domestic product.

Recall from 1945, the cost of the US government exceeds the income of the country by an average of 3% of GDP. The problem of the budget deficit lies in the fact that America has become a hostage to its own myth of undeniable political and military superiority on a global scale. Despite the fact that the share of the overseas state in the global economy is falling, Washington continues to increase spending aimed at implementing the crazy idea of ​​global domination.

At the same time, the almost unceasing seventy-year growth of the budget deficit did not, until recently, pose a serious threat to the US economy. As soon as the money in the American treasury ended, the government began to print bonds, which they then exchanged from the Federal Reserve System (US central bank) for dollars. Note that the financial institution often bought the country's debt obligations with unsecured money.

As a result, not always materially supported credit obligations of the US authorities were sold to central banks of other states at a rate not exceeding 2-3%. In exchange, foreign lenders received Fed acclaim on the reliability of the US monetary system and the promise that meager interest would be paid on time. The beautiful carrot proposed by Washington, although it had an unpleasant taste, but at least satisfied the feeling of hunger of the economies of foreign countries.

As it now turns out, only the old fence remained from the currency garden. Servicing the public debt is already costing Washington 250 billions of dollars, which is 1,5% of GDP. It seems that the inclusion of the printing press at full capacity, which will start to make money out of thin air, will entail an outflow of foreign investments that make up more than 35% or 7 trillions of dollars in the structure of public debt.

They add fuel to the fire, which does not seem to leave a trace from the American economic system, the upcoming presidential elections. So, for the 22 of the day, Washington's national debt grew by 237 billion, closely approaching the mark of 20 trillions. If we compare in nominal terms, over the past three weeks, the increase in public debt has exceeded the country's debt to 1944 year.

Thus, the new head of the White House in a hurry will have to solve a financial problem, which in 8 has escalated to unprecedented limits. Obviously, attempts to get out of the economic depression will be undertaken in one of two scenarios.

It seems to be the most realistic that the new president would kindly offer the Americans who elect him to tighten their belts, raising taxes and reducing social benefits. If the situation develops according to this scheme, the US economy will face a recession, which will drag on for many years.

The second option assumes that the United States will soon make a gift to its creditors, declaring a default in the country. In this case, losses estimated in trillions of dollars will be incurred by a number of leading countries, including China, Japan, and the UK. However, the world does not have to wait for anything good from the actions of the American establishment ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    24 October 2016 06: 11
    There is a third option - the war will write everything off.
    1. +2
      24 October 2016 07: 18
      Yeah - that's for sure, and even the opponent of democracy has already been found.
    2. +9
      24 October 2016 08: 04
      Sorry, but this is another article on the topic - America will bend tomorrow
      Well what kind of crap is written?
      Experts get out of economic depression

      Well, what kind of depression (now in the States) can we talk about?
      The real growth of US GDP in the II quarter of 2016, according to the second estimate, amounted to 1,1% in annual terms. Such data today leads the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Ministry of Commerce of the country.

      Thus, the indicator coincided with the forecast of analysts surveyed by Reuters, reports PRIME

      Unemployment at a minimum with (1970г) level.
      Well, is it so easy to (author) google?
      Quote: siberalt
      that the new president will kindly offer the Americans who choose him to tighten their belts by raising taxes and reducing social payments. If the situation develops according to this scheme, the US economy will face a recession that will drag on for many years.

      i.e. recession from depression?
      a strange conclusion, although the lines generally follow one after another.
      If depression is now, then recession (from an economic point of view) is a better condition than depression.
      it reminded me of an anegdot. Maybe not quite in the subject, but the logical thread is approximately looked through
      The West tried to bring Russia to its knees - but it continued to lie


      The second option assumes that the United States will make a gift to its creditors in the near future by defaulting in the country.

      Well, what the fuck default, well chesslovo.
      Default - when they cannot pay debts, today the Fed has always paid debts and its debt obligations have the highest credit rating and are being bought up by everyone (including Russia).
      Article minus (although they are no longer) laughing
      1. +3
        24 October 2016 10: 00
        So, dear, US GDP growth is the data of the USA itself.
        And how to fool people with lies-this is not the United States to occupy.
        If the real sector of the economy is taken into account, then in the USA there is just a recession.
        And everyone understands why it is necessary to show a surplus - so as not to frighten investors.
        So your conclusions are incorrect from the beginning, because you operate on propaganda data and not on the real economy.
        1. +1
          25 October 2016 10: 01
          Quote: Barnaul, Altai

          3
          Barnaul, Altai Yesterday, 10:00 ↑ New
          So, dear, US GDP growth is the data of the USA itself.
          And how to fool people with lies-this is not the United States to occupy.

          The esteemed Barnaul knows best, and he has more data than all the Kremlin and China analysts who invest in US papers.
          Dear, can I source your data? Or was it "a dream from Thursday to Friday?"
  2. +3
    24 October 2016 06: 15
    Over the past 20 years, the United States has unleashed so many armed conflicts that one can only compare with a disaster movie.


    Here is a detailed account of the number of US interventions in the affairs of other states.
    http://maxpark.com/user/2299474397/content/151392
    6


    When the quantity goes into quality, a turning point in the situation sets in ... the USA has clearly set up half the world against itself ... it will end badly for them.
    1. 0
      25 October 2016 10: 04
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      The United States clearly opposed half the world ... it will end badly for them.

      Judging by the allies, then the United States has many times more than Russia, so for Russia it will end badly? China + India + West + Asia are not opposed to the United States, and this is a large part of the world, both in human and economic terms.
  3. +3
    24 October 2016 06: 17
    Well, the first option is unlikely. So before the civil war is not far away. But the whole world ....
    By the way, there is a third way. Continue printing candy wrappers. "Otherwise we will arrive and bring democracy even more"
    1. +1
      24 October 2016 07: 29
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      So before the civil war is not far away.


      Well, who is against whom? There were economic downturns in the United States, followed by higher taxes and a shrinking social base. There will be no civil war there, the maximum is a protest like Occupy Wall Street.
      1. +2
        25 October 2016 09: 34
        Yes, a lot of comers - blacks against whites, Chinese against blacks, Latinos against everyone else, normal against pederasts, finally. Maybe it's all locally - Latinos in Florida, Chinese in California ... The question is that the guys just need help in self-determination and self-awareness. Soros and Rockefellers constantly incite Shiites against Sunnis, Muslims against Christians, etc. And why do you think that there is no one Lee Xi Qing who will tell his fellow tribesmen that they will be heavily oppressed in San Francisco, not allowing them to expand Chinatown to SanDiego? The question is in the correct organization and in the selection of slogans.
  4. +2
    24 October 2016 06: 27
    US government debt rose from 70% to 115% of gross domestic product.

    But at the same time, they not only fatten at the expense of others, but also continue to sponsor the rabble from the so-called. "people's democracies" to outright bandits and terrorists. If the Americans are pressed, then without a twinge of conscience they can, as the author writes, declare a default. They deeply do not care about their allies, let alone creditors. Still, they used to say correctly - "Capitalism is a parasite on the body of the proletariat."
    1. +4
      24 October 2016 08: 08
      Quote: rotmistr60
      US government debt rose from 70% to 115% of gross domestic product.

      total 115%? All countries in Europe can envy this, and China -
      In the first quarter of 2016, China's total debt grew to a record 237 percent of GDP, which is higher than in other countries with growing economies. It is reported by The Financial Times with reference to its own calculations.

      The debt situation increases the risk of a financial crisis or a slowdown in economic growth in China, economists surveyed warned.

      Where China before Ethiopia with 33% debt from GDP, for Luxembourg (3200% debt from GDP) - all that remains is to envy Ethiopia’s economic power.
      1. +1
        24 October 2016 08: 16
        If Ethiopia provided the whole world with green papers ... So you would have compared China and the United States, whose economies are almost equal. 33% vs 115%
        1. +3
          24 October 2016 08: 28
          Quote: rotmistr60
          If Ethiopia provided the whole world with green papers.

          If my grandmother would have - then everyone knows.
          EU - Euro one of the reserve currencies - domestic debt 112%
          China - 237% (yuan reserve world currency - already several months)
          USA - 107% of GDP
          It’s good to cling to this garbage - this figure explains little and it needs to be considered together with the general state of the economy
          By the way, the economies of China and the USA have long been unequal
          The growth rate of China's GDP from January to September 2016 of the year amounted to 6,7%. GDP reached 52,997 trillion yuan or 7,87 trillion dollars.
          This is stated in a published report by the State Statistical Office of China. The growth rate of China's GDP in the I, II and III quarters of 2016 of the year amounted to 6,7%.

          US GDP - 2016 g
          17.4 trillion dollars

          It’s not difficult to calculate that China’s GDP is 40% of the USA
      2. +2
        24 October 2016 23: 17
        Do not confuse government debt with total debt, the United States has a total debt much more than Chinese, found data only for 2009, there is a total debt of four more than external (in the USA) ...
  5. +9
    24 October 2016 06: 38
    How long are the US and the American dollar buried? They will print crisp dollars again and offer them to other countries. It's only our prime minister who can say, "There is no money, you are holding on there!" It's just that our ruble does not enjoy such excitement abroad.
    Can someone point out to me the fundamental difference between our economy and, for example, "Brezhnev's" - the same is the export of hydrocarbons and the developed military-industrial complex - can we export tanks, planes, etc.? what hi
    1. +12
      24 October 2016 07: 05
      Quote: fa2998
      Can someone point out to me the fundamental difference between our economy and, for example, "Brezhnev's" - the same is the export of hydrocarbons and the developed military-industrial complex - can we export tanks, planes, etc.?

      the difference is that under Brezhnev, the income went to free: medicine, education, recreation, housing, and now, into the pockets "from the Forbes list" ...
      1. +3
        24 October 2016 07: 49
        Namesake, you pointed out the difference in the distribution of income, and I agree! But the export potential of the country remained the same. Moreover, the USSR was still producing consumer goods in half with grief. And now in the "superpower" everything is from beyond the hill.
        1. +2
          24 October 2016 10: 58
          There is one not big difference - grain export.
  6. +7
    24 October 2016 07: 17
    Once again, they will raise the ceiling of public debt, business ...
    1. 0
      24 October 2016 08: 09
      Quote: Masya Masya
      Once again, they will raise the ceiling of public debt, business ...

  7. 0
    24 October 2016 07: 53
    World experience shows that the national debt should not exceed half of the country's GDP. So 1,5% is not a reason to panic yet. There is still room to grow. On the other hand, when money is printed, the US GDP will grow in the same way and can continue this way for a very long time. In practice, the United States has achieved its "nirvana" by imposing the global economy on the dollar. But the US war, by and large, is not profitable. It will "write off" the debt, but it will also lead out of "nirvana".
    1. 0
      24 October 2016 23: 20
      1,5% is only debt servicing (interest) the debt itself went far beyond 100% of GDP
  8. +3
    24 October 2016 09: 08
    If the title of the article had at one time been announced by someone from the "White House", then I would have nodded in agreement, and so ... We know WHO and to whom he said the cherished words. It is useless to argue further ...
  9. +1
    24 October 2016 09: 50
    Quote: atalef
    China - 237% (yuan reserve world currency - already several months)


    I’ve been watching you for a long time - you like to distort the facts ... And now - compare the US public debt and the general China! I hope you understand the difference? The national debt of China is somewhere around 30% of GDP, with about 10% external to it ... But the total debt of the USA is not announced - according to various estimates, it is from 50 to 200 trillion dollars!
    1. +1
      24 October 2016 10: 00
      Quote: burglar
      I have been watching you for a long time - you like to distort the facts.

      Well Katasonov for you is not the same authority?

      According to the head of the Russian Economic Society. Sharapova Valentina Katasonova, China came out on top in terms of total debt, ahead of the United States and Germany.
      "About 40 percent of the increase in global debt from 2007 to 2014 was in the PRC," the economist quoted Mackenzie's data. The reason, he said, is that "China, generally speaking, has started doing the same thing that the Western economy was doing - blowing bubbles."

      Read more: Katasonov: China took first place in the world in terms of total debt http://tsargrad.tv/news/2016/04/13/katasonov-kita
      j-vyshel-na-pervoe-mesto-v-mire-po-gosdolgu
  10. +1
    24 October 2016 09: 57
    Instead of another nonsense on the topic of how much the EU did not receive, and so on, I suggest that the author ask the question: if the EU did not receive enough money, therefore, they remained in the Russian Federation, I have not really heard about the increase in trade turnover with China at times. Means "if somewhere that decreases, somewhere something will arrive" - ​​or "where is the money Zin" (c)
    What I want to say: let the author write an article - they say we didn’t buy such-and-such for such and such an amount, but bought such-and-such-and-such and such-and-such - like the balance is maintained.
    And it turns out that it seems like they punished themselves, and our government plans internal loans. Or the author is lying godlessly, or something is wrong here.
  11. 0
    24 October 2016 10: 16
    Quote: atalef
    Quote: burglar
    I have been watching you for a long time - you like to distort the facts.

    Well Katasonov for you is not the same authority?

    According to the head of the Russian Economic Society. Sharapova Valentina Katasonova, China came out on top in terms of total debt, ahead of the United States and Germany.
    "About 40 percent of the increase in global debt from 2007 to 2014 was in the PRC," the economist quoted Mackenzie's data. The reason, he said, is that "China, generally speaking, has started doing the same thing that the Western economy was doing - blowing bubbles."

    Read more: Katasonov: China took first place in the world in terms of total debt http://tsargrad.tv/news/2016/04/13/katasonov-kita
    j-vyshel-na-pervoe-mesto-v-mire-po-gosdolgu


    How does he know the total debt of the United States? belay There he is being intensely hidden! So in this case, not authority ... request And I didn’t write about that - in your arguments you compare the incomparable and issue this as evidence ...
    1. 0
      25 October 2016 10: 14
      Quote: burglar
      How does he know the total debt of the United States? belay There they hide it intensely! So in this case there is no authority ... request

      But you can’t hide it from you, right?))))
  12. +1
    24 October 2016 11: 20
    Author, we believe you laughing
  13. +1
    24 October 2016 11: 24
    This topic has been hiding for the last ten years. The sovereign debt of the USA is so big that tomorrow Khan will come to America / the whole West! Meanwhile, the state. the debt of a number of European countries, and not only it, for which already year has consistently exceeded their GDP by 2-3 or even more times. And nothing live.
    1. +4
      24 October 2016 12: 38
      Quote: Tired
      This topic has been hiding for the last ten years. The sovereign debt of the USA is so big that tomorrow Khan will come to America / the whole West! Meanwhile, the state. the debt of a number of European countries, and not only it, for which already year has consistently exceeded their GDP by 2-3 or even more times. And nothing live.

      Well, you need to distract people from the problems in the country. So we are filled with about poverty in other countries.
  14. 0
    24 October 2016 16: 43
    Even more fun would be the option of replacing banknotes, for example, if the Americans decided to switch from green bucks to red ones, and then change them by country in a strictly fixed amount, for example, do not give more than $ 1000 in one hand.
  15. +2
    24 October 2016 17: 03
    Everyone is talking about the collapse of the dollar, the problem of the US public debt. But why is Russia investing in the US economy?
  16. +3
    24 October 2016 18: 07
    Just no money

    I bought into the headline - I thought it would be about Russia, where, in all seriousness, the ministers of the Medvedev government are proposing to take a tax on the unemployed. And the amount was even recently announced - 20 rubles a year in the form of the so-called "Tax on parasitism".
    But no, it turns out this is not about Russia, but about America. She is not interesting to me.
  17. 0
    25 October 2016 05: 37
    now it’s hard to drive the beast (US dollar) into its den and never let it out again, because there is a lot of lies, selling and violence ...
  18. +1
    25 October 2016 10: 18
    The essence of the article is that it’s good there, only because it will be very bad there soon, and ours is so bad, because there, in the bright future, everything will be very good. Not very smart and trusting fellow citizens like this. To believe that ... well, at least tomorrow the neighbor will be worse than mine - this is the dream of such people. There is nothing to do with life here. In fact, there is a very good standard of living, but with us, it is much lower. That's all the facts. That's the whole public debt.
  19. +1
    25 October 2016 12: 51
    While the dollar is walking around the world, America can print dollars in wagons and sell them to the natives for goodies. As long as you like. Well, they will have a "debt" of 100%, 1000%, 9000%, 100500% .... nothing will change from this.
    1. 0
      26 October 2016 10: 29
      Quote: Lumumba
      While the dollar is walking around the world, America can print dollars in wagons and sell them to the natives for goodies. As long as you like. Well, they will have a "debt" of 100%, 1000%, 9000%, 100500% .... nothing will change from this.

      If their candy wrappers do not mean anything, then why does Russia invest in them, and not vice versa. Why do the "natives" not buy the naughty ones from us? Can we print it too? We are better, do I understand you correctly?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"