A volunteer from God

74
In the pool of unrest broke the fate and ascended someone's stars. For the Reds, a vivid example here is the way of the former non-commissioned officer, who rose to the rank of Marshal, Semyon Budyonny, for the whites - this is Yakov Aleksandrovich Slashchev. His fate is as surprising as it is tragic, besides it is mythological.

For many, the image of Slashchev is still strongly associated with the personality of General Khludov from the film “Running.” It should be noted that neither extensive memoir literature, nor scientific and journalistic works give an unambiguous assessment to Slashchev-man except, perhaps, the largest domestic expert on the White movement, Andrei Kruchinin, in positive colors depicting the image of the legendary general. But what is remarkable: both the red and the white highly valued his military talent.



The biography of Yakov Alexandrovich before the First World War is unremarkable: he was born in 1885 in a noble military family and, having matured, continued his father's work, also choosing the path of an officer, leaving behind him the Pavlovsk military school and the Nikolaev Academy of the General Staff. Studied Slashchev unevenly - the first two courses he graduated in 1-th category, but did not get additional points for assignment to the General Staff. After graduation, he taught tactics in the Corps of Pages. Let us dwell on this fact in more detail. The fact is that he is often put on a par with such "demons of war" as Shkuro, Annenkov, von Ungern-Sternberg. Their star has risen in the flames of the Civil War, and they are difficult to attribute to the military intelligentsia - they are practitioners, but not theorists. But just the same broad outlook and intelligence Slashchev does not fit into this cohort.

With the first volleys of the First World War, Yakov Aleksandrovich was in the ranks of the life guards of the Finnish regiment. She volunteers leaving her young wife at home during the last month of pregnancy.

Among those who volunteered to go to the front was the poet Nikolai Gumilev, who wrote: “And in the roar of the human crowd, in the buzz of passing guns, in the silent call of the war trumpet I suddenly heard the song of my destiny ...” People like Slashchev always responded to such a voice and never waited subpoenas. Their lot on the battlefield is courage and contempt for death. Head Slaschova - the commander of the Finnish Regiment Major General Baron Paul Claude von Jurgensburg recalled: "Infinitely brave, but bravery oblivion or blind courage of the ordinary, but consciously brave chief, Yakov put together with this precious quality of all the talents of a large military leader: a love for military case , excellent military education, firm, decisive character, amazing ability to grasp the situation, etc. In his modest role as a company battalion commander Yakov Aleksandrovich put I guess forethought the course of military events. It was clear that he possesses the secret of military art, which allows him to supplement his usual methods of judgment about events with some sort of inner sense. ”

From Kruchinin’s work dedicated to Slashchev: “Exactly at one o'clock, appointed to attack, minute per minute, he gets up to his full height, removes his cap, earnestly baptizes and goes forward with a naked saber, leading companies to death or victory ...”

A volunteer from GodThe above quote makes it more detailed to touch on the topic of courage, mentioned above, and sometimes even the bravado of Slashchev, under enemy fire. What is it, just the deliberate contempt for death in the style of Napoleon's marshal Murat, who had breakfast under the fire of Russian artillery? No, it is quite deliberate action, due to the care of the soldier. Reasons for her, recalling his participation in the Russian-Japanese war, was named by Lieutenant-General Anton Denikin: “I had an elevation on my right flank, from which I could clearly observe the movements of the Japanese. He is the main attack. The strongest fire, you can not raise your head. The commander of the nearest company, the captain of the Chembarsky regiment, Bogomolov, walks along the chain to its full height, checking the sights ... "Captain, why are you doing this, bend down!". "You can not, Mr. Lieutenant Colonel, people are nervous, poorly target."

In other words, all these attacks in full height had one goal - to raise the morale of the soldiers. That is why the officer losses in the First World War were relatively high - they were leading the soldiers into battle, and did not drive them, as they had recently instilled in us. Has something changed in Civil? Not. And then the officers raised the morale of private soldiers by personal example. And so did the high ranks. Let me quote the lines from the memoirs of the White Guard Major General Boris Steifon, also devoted to the figure of how legendary, so tragic, Lieutenant-General Vladimir May-Mayevsky - commanding the Volunteer Army: “In half an hour the general was already at our chains. Bolshevik bullets clicked on the train and on the iron casing of the car. May went out, stopped on the steps of the car and, not paying attention to the fire, calmly looked at the battlefield. Then he jumped heavily to the ground and went down the chain. Hello, n-tsy! - Hello, Your Excellency. - Well, well earned? - He turned to some soldier. - No, no. What is there to be timid! Well done. What are they to be afraid of, such-and-such? ”

New tactic

The First World War left three injuries and five contusions “flavored” with gas poisoning on the body of Slaschov. It seemed that one step separated the Russian Empire from victory, but its days were numbered. Under the Provisional Government, Yakov Aleksandrovich is on the rise — he takes command of the Life Guards Moscow regiment. But the command was nominal, for the country and the army were plunging into chaos. On the threshold stood a new war - the Civil War. On it the star Slaschova had to climb. Why? Because he, according to Claude, "enjoyed tremendous prestige, captivated the imagination of his subordinates and created the atmosphere of heroism that infects others and gives rise to new heroes."

This is the key to understanding the popularity of Slashchev: a career in the bloody haze of distemper was almost impossible to do without the ability to "captivate the imagination of subordinates." Slashchev was charismatic, although he did not have any magical effect on the crowd, not for nothing to make brilliant speeches in the style of Wrangel, and for the Reds - Trotsky. Charisma of Jacob Alexandrovich - in charm and inner strength.

In the winter cold of 1917, Slashchev, who did not accept the revolution, went to Novocherkassk, to the volunteer army that was being formed. The tasks she faced were ambitious: the liberation of Russia from the Bolsheviks or, to begin with, its southern regions. They decided to stake on anti-Soviet uprisings in the North Caucasian villages. There and went Slashchev. It was not the Cossacks who delegated the uprisings, which was already a mistake. Yes, and as subsequent events showed, in the beginning, the villagers did not want to beat the Bolsheviks, as Slashchev called for them. Such a call found a response mainly in the hearts of old people. The younger ones were either at the front or were returning from it, propagated by the socialists. Old men remained relatively few, however, they fought bravely and skillfully, that they recognized even the red ones, Budyonny for example.

Uprising Slashchevu failed to raise. But every cloud has a silver lining: in the Caucasus mountains, he met another legendary personality - Andrei Shkuro. Another significant meeting took place there - with former Khorunzhim Alexey Avtonomov. His star, however, not for long, also rose in the flames of distemper. Just yesterday, unknown to anyone, who had not crossed the thirty-year boundary, he ascended no less than the position of commander-in-chief of the armed forces of the Kuban-Black Sea Republic. Head fit well spin. At Avtonomov she did not spin: he was aware of the inability to command the army. What did Avtonomov want to offer to Slashchev? Far from serving the Bolsheviks. Unlike his colleagues, Avtonomov did not delirious with the idea of ​​a world revolution, but was, as Trotsky would say, “infected” with patriotism, being the “wrong” Bolshevik and inviting Slashchev and Shkuro to unite efforts to fight the German troops threatening to seize the North Caucasus. Of course, who saw enemies in the Germans, Yakov Aleksandrovich agreed, but set the condition - an agreement with the Volunteer Army. Avtonomov understood that now there was no ideological disagreement, and he also agreed.

Slashchev made a plan for the defense of the North Caucasus. And who knows, perhaps, together with Avtonomov, he would have been able to unite the local Red detachments with volunteers and Cossacks on the basis of a common cause - protecting the country from the Kaiser troops, rallying both sides against a common enemy in battles. If Avtonomov had enough will and perseverance. However, in the conditions of a sharp conflict with the local Sovdep, Avtonomov chose not to rely on Slaschov, but to seek justice in Moscow. This was his fatal mistake, not only costing him a year later, but also not allowing him to extinguish the flames of the Civil War that had broken out in the North Caucasus. Avtonomov, by the way, died not from a bullet, but from typhus, which overtook him in the Holy Cross - now Budyonnovsk, where the young commander-in-chief was driven by Wrangel's divisions. This is a consequence of the wrong choice.

But story does not tolerate the subjunctive mood. And from the assumptions go to the facts. Slashchev, Shkuro, and several other men form the Southern Kuban Army — at that time it was fashionable to call the troops an army, let us remember the Volunteer Army, which at first was barely larger than the regiment.

Of course, Slashchev was much more talented and more educated than Shkuro as a military leader. But it was Andrei Grigorievich who stood at the head of the detachment, since he was a natural Kuban. Yakov Aleksandrovich didn’t object - he was able to push personal ambitions into the background. Yes, and what ambitions, when a small detachment was on the verge of destruction. However, the detachment quickly grew due to the successful and rapid actions developed by Slaschov. His military talent in the fields of the Civil was revealed not only in brilliant victories, but also in understanding: to fight "correctly", as was customary in the First World War, is the surest way to defeat. We need to look for other forms of tactical decisions on the battlefield. And Yakov Alexandrovich quickly found them, which is not true of some other white generals.

After the detachment was merged with Denikin’s army, Slashchev commanded the Kuban Plastun brigade, at the head of which he survived glorious victories and two wounds. Then he is the commander of the 5 brigade of the 5 division, located in the Northern Black Sea region. It is noteworthy that in Crimea Slaschov many were mistaken for Grand Duke Mikhail Alexandrovich, in July 1918, killed by the Bolsheviks. In extremely difficult conditions in the spring of 1919, the brave and talented commander held the Crimea, for which in May of the same year he was deservedly promoted to major general. He was then thirty-three, however, the younger officers, the legendary commander of the Drozdovites Anton Turkul for example, also became generals in the Civic. In May 1919, whites in the south of Russia launched a general offensive. The units of Slashchev reached the Dnieper, where they were supposed to stop - the entire cavalry was being transferred to the main thing - the Moscow direction. But soon came the order to continue the offensive, and the troops (largely national teams) under the command of Slashchev took Nikolaev. Yakov Aleksandrovich personally led the attack on the city.

At the end of August, Slashchev defeated (perhaps the only one of the white generals) to the troops of Nestor Makhno, and a month later to the Petliura gangs. Moreover, the Petliurists were defeated in the course of the little-known (unlike the Oryol-Kromsky operation) Uman counter battle, during which Slashchev against his numerically superior enemy achieved success. However, the fate of the campaign was decided not on the Dnieper, but under Orel, where the talented General May-Mayevsky of the Volunteer Army, who was talented but who suffered from the binge-giving illness, lost control of the troops to a significant degree, and General Kutepov, who headed 1 Army Corps, in the days of the decisive counter battle at the end of November made a number of significant mistakes that Slashchev most likely would have avoided and then ...

Wrangel's fatal error

After the rapid advance of the Denikin armies, an equally rapid retreat followed. It was not an escape. Volunteers fought hard, surpassing the enemy in tactical skill, but behind him in numbers. And then the morale of the Cossack units began to fall. General Wrangel, who replaced May-Mayevsky as commander-in-chief, suggested that Denikin should withdraw volunteer divisions to the Crimea, but guided not so much by the military as by moral considerations and realizing that without the support of Markovtsy, Drozdovtsy, Kornilovtsy and Alekseevts the front of the Dontsy would collapse. The commander refused, ordering the retreat to the south-east - to Rostov. Wrangell fulfilled the order. Protection of the Crimea was entrusted to Slaschova. And he, by that time already a commander, brilliantly coped with the task with small forces. And originally the Crimea was going to defend General Subbotin, having organized a defense along the dam and on the Krymsky Val. The reaction of the future Crimean hero was quite cynical. The historian Oleg Smyslov leads it in his book dedicated to Slaschov: "Far away you will leave on your fortifications, probably, beyond the Black Sea." And he explained his position: "I absolutely do not recognize sitting in the trenches - only very well-trained troops are capable of this, we are not learned, we are weak and therefore we can act only with an offensive, and for this we need to create a favorable environment."

Slashchev retained the Crimea, and in April of the 1920, Wrangel headed the Armed Forces of the South of Russia, renaming them into the Russian army. He succeeded in almost impossible to inspire largely demoralized troops, primarily Cossack units, and in the spring to go on the offensive. It would seem that here the military talent of Slaschova must be used to the full. So, in fact, it was - brilliantly carried out by Slashchev Kirillovka’s operation. But in July, on the eve of the decisive battles, the savior of the Crimea filed a resignation report. Andrei Kruchinin explains: “Unfortunately, General Wrangel, who replaced Denikin as Commander-in-Chief of 22 in March of 1920, unlike his predecessor, was unable to overcome his personal antipathy for Slashchev. After a major offensive operation carried out in early April, when up to four divisions and five separate brigades (virtually all combat-capable units of the Volyura Party were subordinated to Slashchev, this antipathy becomes even more obvious. "

The human factor led to fatal consequences for the entire White movement and the fate of Russia. I will quote Kruchinin again: “Slashchev was the only one of the highest generals of the Russian army who, in the days of the fall of the White Crimea, proposed a plan for rectification of the situation with active offensive actions (large-scale landing operation in Khorlakh or even at the mouth of the Bug and at Odessa). Wrangel’s personal dislike predetermined an assessment of this plan as a purest adventure, although under conditions of extreme tension of forces and exhaustion of almost all reserves of the Soviet Southern Front, such actions could well turn the tide of the struggle. ”

"Shot" in immortality

The further fate of the brave general is known: homesickness, returning to another country, teaching on the “Shot” courses and death. However, the original version of the motive for returning Slashchev to Bolshevik Russia was advanced by Kruchinin, who believes that the legendary general restored relations with Wrangel (they met before leaving) and arrived in Moscow with a secret mission - preparing an anti-Soviet coup. The basis for such a hypothesis is a large number of yesterday's white officers in the Red Army. Is it really, with all certainty difficult to say.

I ask myself: if something unbelievable happens and survive Slashchev flywheel of repressions of the 30s .... In 1941, he would have been only fifty-five. He was still an old, gifted, unconventionally thinking general who knew perfectly well what modern war was and knew how to learn quickly. The latter is evidenced, for example, by Colonel Alexei Selyavkin, during the Great Patriotic War, Deputy Commander of the 13th Guards tank brigades, and in the 20th he attended Slashchev's lectures. In his memoirs, he writes about heated discussions about the role of armored forces in a future war. So, Selyavkin did not say a word that Slashchev underestimated the significance of the armored forces, and if it were, he would not fail to note, especially since he treated the general without any sympathy, seeing him as a class enemy. Yakov Aleksandrovich himself taught the students of the Shot courses how to conduct maneuvering operations, just as it was not in vain that the historian Aleksei Shcherbakov called Slashchev the master of the blitzkrieg.

Army General P.I.Batov recalled Slashchev: “He taught brilliantly, always full of people at lectures, sometimes tension in the audience, like in battle. Many listeners themselves have recently fought Wrangel men, including on the approaches to the Crimea, and the former White Guard general, not sparing slander, dealt with the shortcomings of his and our actions. Gritted his teeth with anger, but learned! ". Moreover, such outstanding commanders of the Great Patriotic War as F.I. Tolbukhin, R. Ya Malinovsky, A. M. Vasilevsky studied.

It is unlikely that the front and the army would be entrusted to Slashchev right away, but the corps could have been completely, and even upon returning to their homeland they were promised. Someone would argue: "Slaschova, despite his reports, was not allowed to command posts." This is so, although he was not directly refused. On the eve of the war, the situation could change. Let me remind you that KK Rokossovsky met the compatriot of the Great Patriotic War, he was also in 1939-m G. K. K. Zhukov.

But the story does not tolerate the subjunctive mood.
74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    23 October 2016 06: 52
    Yes, it is a pity. Enemies of the people in the NKVD did not eat their bread for nothing. It would be interesting to read about Svechin. Also repressed from the academy.
    1. 0
      23 October 2016 20: 20
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      It would be interesting to read about Svechin.

      Oh yeah! Svechin with his theory of "exhaustion" is a separate topic - in all its own it is clearly manifested in Donbas in 2014-2016. In fact, "blitzkriegs" are planned on a defensive basis. In the Red Army 1941 they were afraid to think about it and as a result they got 41-42. What does it mean the delitants ruled in the army. How then we missed him!
    2. +5
      24 October 2016 06: 22
      And what does the NKVD? Slashchev was shot dead by a man who had personal scores for him. It’s stupid to think that he was sent by special services: at any time, the former white general could be taken and shot without any difficulties.
      1. 0
        26 October 2016 22: 16
        Slashchev was shot dead by a Jewish student, avenging his brother, who died in the Crimea. I don’t know if this murderer was somewhere, but they caught and judged the fact.
        Svechin .. here intrigue Tukhachevsky, this Napoleonchik did a lot of things ..
    3. +2
      25 October 2016 16: 56
      We all have a complete vinaigrette in our heads, a civil fratricidal war, it’s scary, they pushed the Russians with our foreheads and had fun rubbing our hands and dividing the unprecedented jackpot that the West received when we completely destroyed each other, and there was very little left. IN CIVIL WARS, THERE ARE NO RIGHTS, NO HEROES, NO GUILTY, THERE ARE AN innocently murdered and killed in the name of mercenary ambitions. Yes, today we can very poorly separate the traitors of Russia from the patriots, but do not rush the story goes on. Shkuro, Krasnov, Vlasov and the like are just those who are conducting ATO in the Donbass today, those shifters who, with Western money, are pushing us against their foreheads again with Russian, Slavs. I think this will not stop when, until there is Anglo-Saxon domination, the dominance of destruction.
    4. 0
      3 August 2017 07: 55
      The NKVD had nothing to do with the death of Slashchev.
  2. +6
    23 October 2016 08: 14
    General Slashchev safely survived the flywheel of repression, the NKVD is unlikely to be related to his death. Given that the general was a great original, his absence on the fronts of the Great Patriotic War hardly affected the combat effectiveness of the troops.
    1. +3
      23 October 2016 10: 14
      I note that the peak of layoffs and landings of military specialists, former officers, fell at the very beginning of the 30s
    2. +1
      24 October 2016 06: 22
      General Slashchev was killed long before the "flywheel of repression".
      1. +1
        24 October 2016 06: 40
        If we consider 1937 as the peak of repressions, then you are right, in 1918, there was a massacre in the 20s - what was it?
        1. 0
          26 October 2016 22: 17
          Slashchev died in 1935.
  3. Cat
    +4
    23 October 2016 08: 20
    Thanks to the author.
    Indeed, you need more such articles, essays and stories about this terrible time and its heroes in order to get "inoculated" from the "civil war".
  4. +7
    23 October 2016 08: 56
    Heroes of civil wars still remain "ours", regardless of the idea for which they honestly fought.
    1. Cat
      +9
      23 October 2016 12: 31
      There is a category of people who have been discredited by their cooperation with fascist Germany. For example: Krasnov and Shkuro. Forgiveness and understanding they do not have!
  5. avt
    +10
    23 October 2016 09: 29
    It is unlikely that Slashchev would have been immediately entrusted with the front and the army, but the corps could have completely, and they promised it upon his return to his homeland. Someone objected: “Slashchev, despite his reports, was not allowed to command posts.” This is so, although he was not directly refused
    laughing Enough that was enough for the talented adventurer Marshal Misha. In general, this eulogy is about what? About the "great" commander who knows no fear? Here is how quite an alcoholic May Mayevsky
    I will allow myself to cite lines from the memoirs of the White Guard Major General Boris Shteifon, also dedicated to the figure of how legendary, so tragic, Lieutenant General Vladimir May-Mayevsky, who commanded the Volunteer Army: “After half an hour, the general was already at our chains. Bolshevik bullets clicked on the steam locomotive and on the iron lining of the car. May got out, stopped on the steps of the carriage and, ignoring the fire, calmly examined the battlefield. Then he heavily jumped to the ground and went along the chain. Hello, n-tsy! - Hello, Your Excellency. - Well, got it? He turned to some soldier. “Not at all.” Why are you shy! Well done. What are they afraid of, such and such? ”
    With an adjutant from the Cheka, he poured a glass, and even a "white Cossack knight" Skins. fool Nothing that all these "outstanding commanders" to the same Budyonny pissed away EVERYTHING. And personally to him and the command of the Latvian division, which was on the spearhead against the Mayevsky corps? And even with a member of the military council .... Stalin. bully Oh, these reenactors for me! The last such exodus of Denikin from the army in Donbass was fulfilled, having previously appointed himself defense minister, now he decided to take up the protection of the Russian people, from Brest to Vladivostok " wassat ..... Somehow it became scary - why did the Russian people have such a punishment in the form of this defender?
    Quote: baudolino
    Heroes of civil wars still remain "ours", regardless of the idea for which they honestly fought.

    wassat Mikhalkov's case with fatigue by the Sun in the form of a blow lives on and wins - if not the director himself, then his descendants will wait for those who voluntarily enlisted as slaves. "followed by lamentation over the lost power.
    But the story does not tolerate the subjunctive mood.
    Well, judging by the article, he’s still suffering. Oh, I have these reenactors crawling into the neo-nobility!
    Well, Paramon ... I, a sinful man, would purposely sign up with the Bolsheviks to shoot you. He would have shot him - and instantly wrote back.
    1. +7
      23 October 2016 10: 07
      Quote: avt
      Mikhalkov's case with fatigue by the Sun in the form of a blow lives on and wins - if not the director himself, then his descendants will wait for those who voluntarily enlisted as slaves. "followed by lamentation over the lost power.
      So they finally lost to Comrade. the communists. It’s not worth taking an example from Gorbachev, Khrushchev, Yeltsin, Shevarnadze, Trotsky, Gaidar, Chubais, etc. These people brought Russia to the edge into the abyss. All of the listed true Leninists or children of true Leninist heroes.
      1. avt
        +4
        23 October 2016 11: 07
        Quote: captain
        So they finally lost to Comrade. the communists. It’s not worth taking an example from Gorbachev, Khrushchev, Yeltsin, Shevarnadze, Trotsky, Gaidar, Chubais, etc. These people brought Russia to the edge into the abyss.

        request So after all
        Quote: avt
        .Well, if there is no mind to follow the example of the WINNERS, not the VICTIMS, and do not betray the “birthright for a lentil stew”, followed by crying about the lost power.

        They decided to sell the ideology, which they themselves had lost faith in, for quite themselves concrete material benefits, and even to steer the world law and order as in the USSR, but already as quite a "noble dons". laughing They left them money for a lordly life, so they even found slaves, but they threw them out of the club of the arbiters of the World's destinies, as the losers in the Cold War, and only a PART of the new prosperous people woke up awareness of what had happened, that in short wisdom says - “Everything buy! Gold said. I'll take everything! He said damask. " bully
        1. 0
          25 October 2016 15: 09
          Quote: avt
          We decided to sell an ideology in which we ourselves had lost faith

          Here is the key phrase of the assessment of our "bright future", the people long ago lost faith in this future, and finally it came to the leaders.
      2. +1
        25 October 2016 12: 00
        Such as: Gorbachev, Khrushchev, Yeltsin or Gaidar should be sent to the leaders of the enemies, and best of all with a butt to the temple.
    2. +6
      23 October 2016 10: 36
      "Outstanding commanders" to the same Budyonny pissed away EVERYTHING. And personally to him and the command of the Latvian division, which was on the spearhead against May Maevsky's corps? And even with a member of the military council .... Stalin.

      In the best of times, the whites had no more than 300. By the end of the war, the Reds had more than 000 under arms. 5x advantage.
      What are the Budyonny, Voroshilovs and other "strategists" with incomplete primary education already shown by the Polish campaign of the 20th year, where the Polish army crushed the advancing army of Tukhachevsky to smithereens.
      Stalin and Budyon joyfully rubbed their hands looking at the disaster that befell a competitor.
      This did not affect the career of the red Bonaparte, being the most capable in the galaxy of red strategists, he tried a lot in the field of adopting various amazing weapons. What is the requirement to adopt 100 MS tanks. After which the USSR would have definitely died.
      Bonaparte was considered the most capable but turned out to be a traitor and a German spy.
      Budyonny and Voroshilov have shown themselves at the beginning of the Second World War. Like Kulik and Tymoshenko. Unthers cannot command armies. Unthers can, at best, command companies.
      But from the service of military specialists in the Red Army arr of the 30s, the highly wise strategists chose to refuse
      1. avt
        +4
        23 October 2016 11: 00
        Quote: Hupfri
        In the best of times, the whites had no more than 300. By the end of the war, the Reds had more than 000 under arms. 5x advantage.

        Teach the materiel EVERYTHING IN REAL TIME, not only two tsifirki in general, which to the thinking person - the intellectual, by the way, show the complete impotence of the white movement in the struggle for power in the country. Although ..... yesterday in the comments about Panther in personal address I’ve already said EVERYTHING through concrete proverbs, I believe that over night the crap didn’t come down, well, judging by
        Quote: Hupfri
        Unthers cannot command armies. Unthers can, at best, command companies.

        laughing Nothing that Zhukov started from non-commissioned companies? Yes, and the Germans commanders field marshals were not born and wands in uniforms in diapers did not play.
        Quote: Hupfri
        But from the service of military specialists in the Red Army arr of the 30s, the highly wise strategists chose to refuse

        fool see Marshal Shapshnikov, to look for those who have smaller ranks and do not ask.
        1. +1
          23 October 2016 21: 15
          Teach the materiel EVERYTHING IN REAL TIME, not only two tsifirki in general,

          I teach, I teach.
          In the Red Army by the 21st under 5 million, at Wrangel in the Crimea 130. Divided by himself.
          .Although ..... yesterday in the comments about Panther in a personal address, I already ALL
          Amateur reasoning. I recommend that you go to the PM website, find the article "Weapons of Victory from a Grenade to a Fighter" in the archive, and study 700 pages of commentary for a start.
          Nothing that Zhukov started from the non-commissioned companies?

          Nothing. Zhukov studied in war and paid for his studies with the blood of soldiers.
          But I was able to learn.
          Budyonny and Co. even having paid for their training with a terrible, inconceivable price did not learn anything
          see Marshal Shapshnikov

          It's all? Nothing else?
          1. avt
            +2
            23 October 2016 21: 56
            Quote: Hupfri
            In the Red Army by the 21st under 5 million, at Wrangel in the Crimea 130. Divided by himself.

            Here he himself was divided on all fronts, and if the mind is not enough and all 5 million were sitting with Perekop against 130 thousand Wrangel, then this is to a specialized, practicing specialist, well, as well as about the relationship of T-54 from Panzerkamf No. 5, nicknamed, ,Panther".
            Quote: Hupfri
            Amateur reasoning. I recommend that you go to the PM website, find the article "Weapons of Victory from a Grenade to a Fighter" in the archive, and study 700 pages of commentary for a start.

            Well I say the right proverb - "To teach fools - only to spoil" Well, not in the horse feed - not my problem if I want to study on Wikipedia.
            Quote: Hupfri
            It's all? Nothing else?

            I didn’t hire Mitrofanushek - look and find it.
            Quote: avt
            look for those who have smaller ranks and do not ask.
            1. +1
              23 October 2016 23: 13
              Here he himself was divided on all fronts, and if there is not enough mind and all 5 million were sitting by the Perekop against 130 thousand Wrangels,

              Well, well, well? And what else are there, then the fronts? In the 21st then? Wrangel and the Poles. For two thousand three hundred, where did 5 million valiant red eagles sit interestingly? Sitting in the Council of People's Commissars? There were no other fronts. That’s it, Lobachevsky.
              kinship T-54 from Panzerkamf No. 5, nicknamed Panther.

              Well, name 10 differences. The T54 had a ball tower. And the Panther has wheels in 2 rows. What else?
              not my problem if wikipedia hunting learn.

              I did not send you to Wikipedia, but to Popular Mechanics. These are, as they say in Odessa, two big differences. But you don’t even have any idea about it. What is interesting and do not seek to know.
      2. 0
        25 October 2016 12: 06
        Red Bonopart, very successfully gas poisoned Russian men.
        As for the non-commissioners, let me disagree: G.K. Zhukov was a vice non-commissioned officer
        1. +1
          25 October 2016 17: 53
          Quote: Monarchist
          Red Bonopart, very successfully gas poisoned Russian men.

          Or gangsters?

          There were 2 shellings. They shot through the forest ......))) Have you seen the taiga near Tambov ?? Yes - the impenetrable jungle of the Amazon laughing laughing
    3. 0
      23 October 2016 20: 36
      Quote: avt
      Enough of the fact that the talented adventurer Marshal Misha was quite enough.

      Who is Tukhachevsky? Learn the details first. By the way, Tukhachevsky conducted the most civil operations for civilian! Lieutenant !!!! So far, generals Denikin, Wrangel, instead of attacking Moscow, held unnecessary celebrations, ceremonies (liturgies, parades and other nonsense). Notice Tukhachevsky and on the eve of his death carried out vigorous activity - read his speeches at military councils, conducted, or attended almost all major exercises, summed up their results, etc. By the way, in Paris he met with white emigration - the former guardsmen of the Semenovsky regiment (the elite of the imperial army). So there is no need to drive Stalinist propaganda and other nonsense here, he is a true professional and during his lifetime he received recognition not only in both warring camps, but also abroad.
      1. avt
        +2
        23 October 2016 22: 08
        Quote: Novel 11
        Who is Tukhachevsky? Learn the details first. By the way, Tukhachevsky conducted the most civil operations for civilian! Lieutenant !!!!

        He is the most self-awarded by almost all orders of the Empire before captivity.
        Quote: Novel 11
        . Notice Tukhachevsky and on the eve of his death carried out vigorous activity - read his speeches at military councils, conducted, or attended almost all major exercises, summed up their results, etc.

        laughing Yes, I always said - a talented adventurer and thank God broke off his vigorous horns and he did not jump into Buonaparte. Somehow, when he releases the ecstasy from his ebullient activity, look and find out how this glorious commander LOST 4 (FOUR weeks) the entire Polish army opposing him, stupidly failing to organize military intelligence. But he was firmly convinced that someday he would find and break it. Well, the truth was found and defeated by the Poles, and then they wrote off everything to Budyonny and Stalin. Here, let in a thought and think - where would the Germans be if Tukhachevsky lost them for 4 weeks in June 1941.
        Quote: Novel 11
        he is a true professional

        Straight from birth and unlike the same "horse marshal" Budyonny did not graduate from the academy. bully But really - why? After all
        Quote: Novel 11
        he is a true professional and during his lifetime gained recognition not only in both warring camps, but also abroad.

        Especially probably the Poles in Poland. bully
        Quote: Novel 11
        Aren't you a maniac?

        I AM!? Yes, it is written by Bulgakov, and the aspod is not yet bred and other noble on the forehead with brilliant green. Well, u
        Who is here? ... Who is here, for example, as an extreme king? Nobody ?! So I will be the first!
        and even more so. bullyPS
        met with white emigration - former guardsmen of the Semenovsky regiment (elite of the imperial army)
        He didn’t tell the “elite” anything about the fate of the officers who had vouched for him, why wouldn’t he run away so that he didn’t get to a strict regime? When did he jump out of captivity to the Bolsheviks? wassat
        1. 0
          23 October 2016 23: 38
          Quote: avt
          He is the most self-awarded by almost all orders of the Empire before captivity.

          You have convictions, and you need a cold (open-minded mind).

          There are descriptions of his acts at the front. In addition, his behavior during the ant sabotage and treason is quite enough.
        2. +1
          24 October 2016 00: 39
          Quote: avt
          Yes i always said - the talented adventurer and thank God broke off his vigorous horns and he did not jump into Buonaparte.

          Your first 3 words have an element of rock and predestination - "Yes, I always said".
          Those. this is the main thing in the discussion. As if there was no need to say so what

          Quote: avt
          LOSED IN 4 (FOUR weeks) the entire Polish army opposing him, stupidly failing to organize military intelligence.

          And how was it necessary? How would you organize ??
          The offensive of the Red Army was overwhelming, the Poles were fleeing. It was then necessary to pursue reconnaissance squadrons? But this is a separation from parts and a threat of destruction. How to organize DEEP rear reconnaissance, rapidly escaping the enemy? There was no mole in the Polish headquarters.

          Now on the offensive north of Warsaw: subjectively put myself in its place and it turns out the same thing !! It’s pointless to take Warsaw forehead, as his illustrious great-grandfather, forts and possible militia on fortified lines ..... Stop looking around ??

          DO NOT, Trotsky is in a hurry to have time to take the capital to the beginning of the congress !! The only thing that succeeds is the transfer of 2 armies that did not deign to appear. Well, you would have decided to storm the assault ???? I think not, this was not done even by the great predecessors - Suvorov and Paskevich. Why? It’s a ridiculous question, because it’s impossible - there are virtually NO armies, they are stretched out and are pursuing advanced echelons (detachments) that prevent the retreating from recovering. But they are already snarling - after all, the suburbs of the capital. There is no ammunition either, there is no aviation for reconnaissance either - there is nothing, there is only enthusiasm.

          We’ll dig another direction, if there is no way to storm Warsaw, then we must cut it off from supplies !! And in his place he would have done the same, otherwise it would not be possible - a tribunal for failure to fulfill an order (the worst for him), displacement (best), then there was no special time to stand on ceremony, commanders either at expense (Dumenko, Mironov, etc.), or quickly displaced.

          How to cut off? Yes, the only artery was the Vistula and the left-bank roads along it. There also methyl Tukhachevsky. Along this line, the Entente was supplied (there, of course, the bourgeoisie were alarmed by Trotsky’s slogans about a permanent revolution) and food and ammunition, even ANTANTA specialists !! You see ANTANTIES, a bottomless barrel of everything and everything! It is known about the French general, apparently he commanded a sharp short Polish counterattack. Such things will not be advertised, although, of course, officially Polish sources trumpeted the whole world about the genius of the PILSUDIAN COMMANDER.

          Besides, it is possible and necessary to understand Tukhachevsky, since along with this, something else could be brought along this path? I will not assert and insist, but they could have thrown the troops too !! Could? Why not? BETS TOO TOO HIGH. So that without looking back, the draping Poles would suddenly gain strength of mind, and their militia would immediately gain professionalism? Something is hard to believe ......................... Just the consequences of the fall of Poland would be disastrous for the West - there could then be seen the German-Soviet Union or something like that - i.e. revenge for the WWII.

          You can list a lot - after all, our Western and Reserve fronts missed Operation Typhoon !! And the forces of the Fritz were hoo what ..... And the offensive near Kharkov in 1942? But there were partisans and reconnaissance and aviation ..... These misses for 41-45 were full, so that TUCHACHEVSKY’S HORRIBLE mistake was like the innocent pranks of our commanders in the war. But you firmly insist, because there is no call within you! Because no!

          Much can be discussed - for example, some of the best commanders Zhukov and Rokossovsky also did not finish the ACADEMY !! Why aren’t you choking on them? They also had defeats and even sabotage of the order. In general, this topic is big, so no need for personal preferences.
          1. +1
            24 October 2016 06: 27
            Dear, we are talking about the fact that the "brilliant marshal" LOST, that is, he did not know where the enemy troops were at all for FOUR WEEKS. Find at least one similar case in the entire history of mankind And while he was still planning something there. Very funny. I don’t know where the enemies are, and to hell with them, there will be sooner or later .... but for now I’ll think about how to surround Warsaw. So he surrounded me. Having miscalculated everything that was possible. And then I found some more and fucked it up a second time. He was a brilliant commander, what can I say. I can also put myself in anyone's place, but still there is a difference, you are the commander, or just Vasya from the next lane.
            1. +1
              24 October 2016 21: 50
              Quote: Molot1979
              Dear, we are talking about the fact that the "brilliant marshal" LOST, that is, he did not know where the enemy troops were at all for FOUR WEEKS. Find at least one similar case in the entire history of mankind And while he was still planning something there. Very funny. I don’t know where the enemies are, and to hell with them, there will be sooner or later .... but for now I’ll think about how to surround Warsaw. So he surrounded me. Having miscalculated everything that was possible. And then I found some more and fucked it up a second time. He was a brilliant commander, what can I say. I can also put myself in anyone's place, but still there is a difference, you are the commander, or just Vasya from the next lane.

              Dear, and who gave you this MILITARY secret? What do you think that kids from a day nursery hang out on these sites ?? Tukhachevsky conducted the most operations in the war !! This is a given !! Are there any other questions? WHAT 4 weeks? Aw. Do you know who Kakurin was? His contribution was far from small in military theory and he was the chief of staff of the Western Front. How can you not lose the main forces of the enemy, if the front is completely crumbled ..... you know, completely. If Budyonny’s army without special overstrain broke through the Polish front, you see - horsemen on foot capture Polish lanes with trenches and a thorn! Here it is - under Komarov’s army they’re uncovered in the trash! What Budyonny suddenly went nuts? Or did the Polish legions get drunk on a magic elixir ?? I repeat, I have no data on the participation of any French foreign legion, but emphasizing the victory there is 100% non-Polish, and since this is an unlimited Entente resource, against which we had no forces at that stage.

              As for the loss of the enemy: Are you aware that Zhukov was crying when Stalin appeared in the people's commissariat of defense? Then it’s not that the front has lost ..... fronts!

              So the loss of control for a month is for the kids.
              1. 0
                24 October 2016 22: 19
                Quote: Novel 11
                he was the chief of staff of the Western Front.

                to blame, deputy chief of staff
    4. 0
      23 October 2016 21: 07
      Quote: avt
      Well, Paramon ... I, a sinful man, would purposely sign up with the Bolsheviks to shoot you.

      Aren't you a maniac? laughing
  6. +2
    23 October 2016 11: 13
    What do you all comment on in the style of the Russian heroostratus of the 21st century Eltsyn, Academician Pivovarov, who burned more than 3 million Slavic manuscripts. Enough, like the United States, to engage in verbiage, better read history. The 1st Cavalry Corps of the Red Army created Corps Commander Dumenko, but he was one of the former tsarist officers. Therefore, the 1st Cavalry Corps was given under the command of Budyonny, and Dumenko was sent to create a new 2nd Cavalry Corps of the Red Army. Subsequently, Budyonny wrote a denunciation on Dumenko and he went into oblivion! !! Yesenin said well about Mayakovsky: "It is not so difficult to write on the walls of the toilet! Among Mr. we are all poets, among poets we are Mr.."
    1. +4
      23 October 2016 12: 00
      Dumenko was from the peasants, he was not an officer, he hated the commissars and Trotsky - this was not forgiven him.
      1. +5
        23 October 2016 13: 40
        I recommend to see who were the chiefs of staff of most of the red commanders.
    2. avt
      +3
      23 October 2016 15: 03
      Quote: njvlin
      Yesenin said well about Mayakovsky: "It is not so difficult to write on the walls of the toilet! Among Mr. we are all poets, among poets we are Mr.."

      It can be seen that somewhere in the toilet sidyuchi they picked up the knowledge written on the walls of this very toilet, marked on the map with the letters M and Jo " fool And the campaign themselves and scratched with their pants down about
      Quote: njvlin
      . The 1st Cavalry Corps of the Red Army was created by Commander Dumenko, but he is from the former Tsarist officers.

      Dumenko BEFORE 1917, well, without delving into the intricacies of class origin, he rose to the rank of VAKHMISTER Well, so as not to suffer from ignorance until the next visit to the water closet
      WAHMISTER (from German Wachtmeister) - the rank and position of non-commissioned officers in the cavalry and horse artillery in the Russian and some foreign armies, as well as in the gendarmerie.
      Yet again
      Quote: bober1982
      Dumenko was from the peasants, he was not an officer, he hated the commissars and Trotsky - this was not forgiven him.

      This is short, but closer to the topic of the death of Dumenko, if you delve into it, you can rather put it on a par with such historical characters as Makhno, Grigoriev and Schors's associate, Bozhenko.
  7. +8
    23 October 2016 12: 42
    he met another legendary person - Andrei Shkuro.

    Can there be a legendary person who wore a fascist uniform ... The British government awarded Shkuro the Order of the Bath for the "successful" struggle against "red" compatriots. Slashchev gave interesting testimony against the leaders of the white movement:
    “Wrangel is ambitious, power-hungry, cunning and a traitor at heart, but the cleverest of the generals who remained there - I can also add: he is corrupt and likes (very cleverly) to appropriate black property for his own good.
    Kutepov, an excellent combatant — sergeant major — is suitable for a post to the battalion commander, always about his chief of staff, in the military sense, is worth nothing.
    Shatilov (chief of staff) - military mediocrity and a thief.
    Barbovich - as far as I know, he is an honest man, few by education.
    Bogaevsky - (Don Ataman) - clever, indecisive, excellent cabinet worker.
    Tundutov (Astrakhan ataman) - an adventurer, cunning and courageous, can go to blackmail, typical of Wrangel.
    Vitkovsky (occupies various positions and serves as Kutepov's assistant) - not dangerous, very stupid ... "
    Characterizing the Russian emigrants in Constantinople, Slashchev is alien to all sentiments:
    - A lot of bastards and drunks - you need to make a personal choice.
    1. +5
      23 October 2016 13: 15
      It is unlikely that these testimonies can be called interesting, such statements can be called - to discredit their former military comrades. General Slashchev evokes sympathy, but some of his actions and actions occurred under the influence of cocaine.
      1. 0
        23 October 2016 16: 57
        Why is it ... they’re just talking about when there is no agreement in the comrades, their case will not work out well ..
        1. +2
          23 October 2016 17: 06
          The fact that there was no agreement, and their affairs were poorly argued pointless, everything is true. But to run across to the enemy’s side and throw mud at your comrades is what Slashchev doesn’t paint.
          Lots of bastards and drunkards as the general put it about people who were left without means of subsistence, this is what a person can say whose body is poisoned by alcohol and drugs. He is excusable.
          1. +3
            24 October 2016 06: 30
            Quote: bober1982
            But to run across to the enemy’s side and water their comrades with mud

            Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Shevarnadze and the legion of demons in caliber smaller ..
  8. +5
    23 October 2016 12: 45
    The article about Slashchev is interesting, but not without flaws ... Why is the portrait of Kolchak presented to the material?

    I ask the author to explain what it means voluntarily ...
    "... With the first volleys of the First World War, Yakov Aleksandrovich is in the ranks of the Life Guards of the Finland Regiment. He volunteers, leaving his young wife at home in the last month of pregnancy ..."

    An Imperial Army officer who took the oath and volunteered ...? Was he a cripple or was he released "from the royal service"?
    Nikolai Gumilyov, a famous poet, this one, yes, went voluntarily as a volunteer, since he was not subject to conscription due to his civil status. This is a real volunteer, who has earned two St. George's Crosses for his exploits ... The deviators Yesenin and Mayakovsky where are you? She hid in every possible way from the war for the Motherland !!! And then they elevated their cowardice to their own merit, as "fighters" against the existing system ...
  9. 0
    23 October 2016 12: 54
    I propose to familiarize myself with the material on the heroism and hostilities of the Life Guards of the Finland Regiment on the VO website ...

    "... Life Guards Finland Regiment: brave" Finns "in the service of the Russian Empire

    October 29, 2013 11 ... "
  10. +4
    23 October 2016 13: 06
    From the report of Slashchev P.N. Wrangel on April 4 1920:

    "Intrigues in the small territory of Crimea are incredibly growing. The struggle is going on with the indigenous defenders of the front, including me, even invading my privacy (alcohol, cocaine). "

    After 4 months, in August Slashchev filed a resignation report.

    P.N. Wrangel wrote about this:
    "I decided to satisfy his request and dismiss him. Appreciating his achievements in the past, I forgave him a lot, however, lately I have become more and more convinced that leaving him further at the head of the corps is impossible.
    Abusing Drugs and Wine, General Slashchev surrounded himself with all sorts of crooks. Sinking down mostly insane, he reached the limit when a person cannot be responsible for his actions
    .

    Well, where do the addict and alcoholic go? To the Bolsheviks, of course .....
    1. +1
      23 October 2016 13: 21
      "Do not judge and you will not be judged ..."
    2. 0
      23 October 2016 20: 45
      Quote: Aleksander
      Well, where do the addict and alcoholic go?

      In Bulgakov's "Run" he has strong "glitches". But the classic has united them on moral grounds, the soul cries for the innocent murdered Krapilin.
  11. +5
    23 October 2016 16: 13
    Again "French roll crunch". Again moaning about what was not. All these Kolchaks, Wrangels, May-Mayevsky, Slashchevs and other losing "geniuses" COULD NOT WIN the Civil War. The people were not for them, the ratio of the number of troops (given earlier) of 30 against 000 bayonets indicates that the whites fought with their PEOPLE. And do not believe the movie admirals with the intelligent eyes of Khabensky, this is an artist and if they pay well, he will play the intelligent and incomprehensible Chikatila by his contemporaries. Do you like oligarchs? So, the White Army was an army that defended the oligarchs from the people.
    1. +2
      23 October 2016 20: 59
      Quote: Pushkar
      Do you like oligarchs? So, the White Army was an army that defended the oligarchs from the people.

      There they had a lot of symbols for which they were dying - the majority, it seems, was still for their estates and estates ...... but there were also those who were for the honor, the glory of Russian weapons, the oath, for the foundations and orders of old life , spiritual values, simply - against confusion, Sabantuism and chaos. After all, after the October Revolution, this began - who went to Peter’s apartments with searches, robbed, raped and killed? Not revolutionary sailors who had lost their blood from the executions and lynching of their officers ??
      1. 0
        24 October 2016 00: 59
        Quote: Novel 11

        but there were also those who were for the honor, the glory of Russian weapons, the oath, for the foundations and orders of former life, spiritual values, simply against confusion, Sabantuism and chaos.
        On either side there are their idealists and their bastards. Like on white. so on red. The question is what the bulk are fighting for.
        1. +1
          24 October 2016 02: 05
          Quote: Pushkar
          The question is what the bulk are fighting for.

          No questions - for myself laughing
          1. +1
            24 October 2016 11: 22
            Quote: Novel 11

            No questions - for myself laughing
            And even everyone understands this in their own way. One is fighting for a happy life for his children, the other is for the opportunity to rob, the third feels like a man only dominating over others.
            1. 0
              24 October 2016 21: 56
              Quote: Pushkar
              And even everyone understands this in their own way. One is fighting for a happy life for his children, the other is for the opportunity to rob, the third feels like a man only dominating over others.

              Quote: Pushkar
              And even everyone understands this in their own way. One is fighting for a happy life for his children, the other is for the opportunity to rob, the third feels like a man only dominating over others.

              Yes, I agree, such is the salami of people.
    2. +4
      23 October 2016 23: 26
      testifies that whites fought with their people.

      Not with his people, but with a terrorist structure like the current IS.
      The army recruitment was carried out constantly regardless of the situation and necessity. Planning was completely absent, hence the unreasonably high states. Some regiments scattered, others were recruited to replace them.
      Do you like oligarchs?

      The so-called oligarchs were replaced by cannibals
    3. 0
      24 November 2016 08: 12
      For what and why did the white volunteers fight? The answer is simple. You just need to work hard to re-read the first two chapters of "Sketches of Russian Troubles" by A.I. Denikin to plunge into the abyss of shame and humiliation in the spring and summer of 1917, and then a lot will become clear.
  12. +5
    24 October 2016 00: 02
    About Svechin. My grandfather, a participant in the First World War, used to say about tsarist officers that they are good when they sleep with their teeth against the wall. He told how their rank-and-file soldiers were punished for various violations - they put on the watch on the parapet the trench lines under German bullets. This was added and Svechin. About this he himself repeatedly told students of the Red Army Military Academy in the 20s. Read the books of Ilya Dubinsky.
    1. +2
      24 October 2016 12: 41
      Quote: Alexander Green
      put on the watch on the parapet of the trench line under German bullets. This was added and Svechin

      This was the case with the "crossbowmen" who wounded themselves in order to escape to the rear. The communists simply shot such clever people.
  13. +2
    24 October 2016 06: 32
    The author forgot to add one piquant detail - the nickname Slashchev earned by him in the fields of Civil. The nickname was Hangman. For brilliant command and numerous victories, it should be. And this type of Soviet power just did not kiss the fifth point. And allowed to return, and work on the profile immediately gave. Well, Shkuro, of course, is not forgotten. Caressed by the author as Hitler did not caress. True, in 1947 the neck of the valiant knight of the white movement broke in a well-deserved loop.
    1. +3
      24 October 2016 12: 47
      Quote: Molot1979
      The nickname was - The Hanger

      The nickname given by the communists. It is unlikely that this can be taken into account. Slashchev actually signed the verdict to hang about a dozen Bolsheviks in the Crimea who were partisans in the rear of the Russian Army. Given the fact that after the departure of the armed forces of the Government of the South of Russia in November 1920 by the Communists, over 28 thousand were executed according to minimum estimates man- Slashchev is a great humanist.
      1. 0
        24 October 2016 22: 01
        Quote: ALEXEY VLADIMIROVICH
        according to minimal estimates, more than 28 thousand people were executed- Slashchev was a great humanist.

        Somewhere there was a conversation, there he mentioned that only in Sevastopol after the "liberation" about 8 thousand were shot, is it true or not?
        1. +4
          25 October 2016 01: 13
          About executions in the Crimea
          “Washing is always harder than spitting.”

          Rumors of mass executions of white officers in Crimea are greatly exaggerated.

          1. In order not to be unfounded, let us turn to the book of Baron P.N. Wrangel's “Memoirs (November 1916 - November 1920)” in two books. And in chapter IX "Everything on Wrangel" of his second book P.N. Wrangel notes: “By September 1, our forces did not exceed 25 bayonets and 000 pieces. And in Crimea, for the prepared fortifications, even a smaller number of the military personnel of our troops managed to retreat. ”
          Suppose, 30 retreated. If each officer in the subordination had at least four to five soldiers, it turns out that there were about 000 white officers in the Crimea. Total!!!
          Of course, those who were shot were tried, those whose hands were up to the elbow in blood. Otherwise, where did the thousands of white officers come from in Turkey, Bulgaria, Korea, China, France, the USA, and around the world. I REMEMBER THAT ON ALL FRONTS (ON ALL) IN THE WHITE ARMY, FULL OF 40 OFFICERS (TOTAL) Fought.

          2. In total, General Wrangel managed to evacuate 145693 people from the peninsula (of which about 5000 were wounded and sick). From the country were exported: up to 15 thousand Cossacks, 12 thousand officers, 4-5 thousand soldiers of regular units, more than 30 thousand officers and officials of the rear units. In total, after the completion of the evacuation, about 2000 officers and 53000 ordinary soldiers remained in the Crimea.
          Only about 3000 people were shot by the Crimean Cheka. All of them have documents that indicate that in Crimea only those who “distinguished themselves” by atrocities during the stay of Wrangel’s troops on the peninsula were convicted and executed. Documents, photographs, testimonies of witnesses are given in the Crimean archives in the cases of shot flayers, for example, as they, for example, poisoned the family of a worker suspected of participating in the underground as dogs or, as simferopol underground, were thrown from the depot under the wheels of a steam locomotive.

          Here is the fate of one of the officers of the Wrangel army in Crimea in 1920

          2. Karum Leonid Sergeevich (1888-1968) - former captain of the Russian army. He graduated from the Kiev Military School (1908), the Alexander Military Law Academy (1917), served in the 19th Kostroma Infantry Regiment, in which he took part in the First World War. In 1918, he joined the hetman Skoropadsky’s army as a candidate for military court positions in the military prosecutor’s supervision in the Kiev Higher Military Court. In September 1919 - April 1920 Lecturer at the Konstantinovsky Military School in the Armed Forces of the South of Russia (VSYUR), then - the Latvian consul in the Russian Army, General Wrangel. After the evacuation of whites, he remained in the Crimea, the Cheka was acquitted. Then he worked in various organizations. In 1922-26 - Assistant to the head, head of the educational part of the Kiev united school named after Kameneva, then - military instructor of the Institute of National Economy. The first time he was arrested in the fall of 1929, however, he was released and moved to Moscow, where he taught at the 1st Moscow State University. Arrested on January 12, 1931, April 20, 1931 was sentenced in the framework of the case "Spring" to 5 years of forced labor camps. After his early release (July 1, 1934) he lived in Novosibirsk, taught foreign languages ​​at a medical university. In 1948, the criminal record was dropped.
          1. +1
            25 October 2016 17: 26
            Quote: Alexander Green
            AT ALL FRONTS (AT ALL) IN THE WHITE ARMY, A TOTAL 40 OFFICERS Fought

            Your information is ALREADY wrong, because at least 170 thousand officers plus 35-40 thousand fought in the Limitroph armies as part of the Russian anti-Bolshevik formations. Http: //swolkov.org/tro/index.htm In Crimea, the Communists destroyed not only officers, and they carried out the extermination of the Russian educated estate-bureaucracy, the nobility, etc. 28 thousand executed by the Chekists - this is the minimum figure. For example, the Communists in Yevpatoria also shot Makhnovist commanders from the Karetnik group who fought AGAINST the Russian Army.
            1. +4
              26 October 2016 00: 03
              Amendment: Since it was a question of executions in the Crimea, I had in mind 40 thousand officers of the white army in the southern theater of operations (the entire south of Russia),
              And the fact that the Chekists carried out the extermination of the Russian educated class of officials, the nobility is an ordinary lie. Example with captain Karum. In addition, no one has ever found any mass graves. If they were, then Memorial would have long been found and untwisted, like the Germans with the Poles of Katyn.
              1. +1
                27 October 2016 01: 45
                Quote: Alexander Green
                Captain Karum example
                incorrect; Leonid Karum is a Latvian, and among the Chekists there were especially many of them. In addition, the Latvian division of the Red Army stormed Perekop, so the captain had just a friendly meeting with fellow countrymen. At the end of the White’s stay in Crimea, Leonid Sergeyevich undertook to defend the Bolshevik leaders of Theodosia captured by the white. The cause of these Bolsheviks dragged on, soon the Red troops liberated them, but the grateful Theodosian Bolsheviks gave Karum the best recommendations. http://www.kvvidkus27.narod.ru/iu21.html.
      2. 0
        5 November 2016 00: 02
        Quote: ALEXEY VLADIMIROVICH
        Quote: Molot1979
        The nickname was - The Hanger
        The nickname given by the communists.

        The first time this nickname sounded from the rostrum of the State Duma somewhere in 1910.
        1. +1
          5 November 2016 12: 54
          It is thought in 1910 that Slashchev existed in the Duma and was not suspected.
          1. 0
            24 November 2016 19: 22
            I apologize for some reason, wrote about Slashchev, and thought about Stolypin. Stupid reservation on my part.
  14. +1
    24 October 2016 19: 24
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    Enemies of the people in the NKVD did not eat their bread for nothing.

    If ***** is the NKVD's fault?
    The People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs of the USSR (NKVD of the USSR) was formed in 1934.
    The composition of the NKVD of the RSFSR from 1923 to 1930. included: criminal investigation, police, protection of places of detention, fire service, etc.
    Another structure was involved in political affairs, i.e. even on the assumption of the liquidation of Slashchev, the NKVD of the RSFSR did not participate, and the NKVD of the USSR did not yet exist.
  15. 0
    24 October 2016 19: 51
    ... The further fate of the brave general is well known: homesickness, returning to another country, teaching the Shot courses and death. However, the original version of the motive for Slashchev's return to Bolshevik Russia was put forward by Kruchinin, who believed that the legendary general had restored relations with Wrangel (they had met before leaving) and arrived in Moscow with a secret mission - preparing an anti-Soviet coup. The basis for this hypothesis is the large number of yesterday's white officers in the Red Army. Is this really so, it’s hard to say with certainty ...
    Igor Khodakov

    What do you think, if you accept the version of Kruchinin, then the liquidation would be justified?

    Although, probably, the version of Molot1979 is no less convincing. .
    Quote: Molot1979
    And what does the NKVD? Slashchev was shot dead by a man who had personal scores for him. It’s stupid to think that he was sent by special services: at any time, the former white general could be taken and shot without any difficulties.


    I would rate the liquidation / revenge versions as 50/50.
  16. +2
    26 October 2016 11: 44
    I read the comments about Slashchev .... So the chieftains Annenkov and Semenov will soon become lambs.
    1. 0
      24 November 2016 08: 25
      No one was the lambs. Civil war is the most dirty and disgusting phenomenon in nature always and among all peoples. The Roman scriptions and atrocities of the federal forces in the South of the USA are no different from the events in Russia in essence. Hands to the elbow in the blood were all white, red, green. This fact should be taken for granted and not taken as a personal insult to the appearance of more or less benevolent publications about a particular character of the national catastrophe of 1917-1922.
  17. +1
    26 October 2016 21: 54
    One in one note from the Military-Industrial Courier, even a photograph of the ghoul Kolchak and put it here. It would be better to talk more about Slashchev. Minus article.
  18. 0
    3 August 2017 07: 54
    Well, the man did not live to the Second World War. Slashchev earned his nickname "The Hanger" quite deservedly. Considering how many people he killed in Crimea, one should not be surprised at the fact that the avenger got to him, but only at the fact that he got so late. Although he had military talent. Yes, and literary was there, his memoirs were very interesting to read