Installation "Yars" for the first time ferried across the pontoon bridge

In the Strategic Missile Forces, unique maneuvers were conducted, during which the launcher of the mobile complex "Yars" was transported through the deep-water tributaries of the Volga, reports press office Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

The width of the forced sections ranged from 30-ti to 250 meters.

“According to the plan of operation, air strikes and actions of conditional saboteurs destroyed the objects of positional areas and elements of the road network, first of all - bridges over water barriers. A complex situation was created that required the use of forces and means of the pontoon-bridge brigade, ”the release says.

Duplicate bridges in the area did not exist. Pontoon-bridge parks (ПП-91, ПП-2005) were used for the guidance of the crossings.

“To build a temporary bridge across the Nerl River, military engineers took no more than half an hour. On wide sections of rivers, special pontoon ferries were used to cross units of the Yars PGRK, which traveled at speeds up to 20 km / h using two BMT-460 tugboats, ”the press service reported.

It is emphasized that "an operation of this magnitude with the building of a bridge for large-sized equipment with a payload of more than 100 tons was carried out for the first time."

The military department explained that “the design of the park on which the missile system was transported, allows to assemble a double-width pontoon with a payload of more than 170 tons”.

Previously, in a difficult situation in conditions of limited visibility of the Topol PGRK installation in the Tver region, the Berezayka River was forced through a prepared ford.

Comments

[Banishing liberoids]

Was there a cover for crossing over from the air? And without air cover, it’s just a tidbit for adversary missiles, albeit at exercises, but you need to simulate such situations not on a computer, but on exercises.

[Homo]

Quote: Exorcist Liberoids

Was there a cover for the crossing from the air?

And why is it said? After all, it is written: "It is emphasized that" an operation of this scale with the construction of a bridge for large equipment with a carrying capacity of over 100 tons was carried out for the first time. " The crossing system has been tested !!! What does air cover have to do with it? You will also ask: "Have you ensured the ecological compatibility of the crossing?"

[cniza]

I think no one dares to repeat this, neither the United States nor the West even more so.

[Titsen]

Is Yars exactly on the photo?

[Fitter65]

[quote], it is necessary to simulate such situations not on a computer, namely on exercises. / quote]
Thank you! Your opinion was very important for us ... If you read, then it turns out that people who plan and conduct events of this rank have somehow managed to finish elementary school at most. And here are keyboard strategists who are everyone and all at once ... [quote] The exorcist of liberoids [/ quote] Do you even know how to conduct a company TSU and a battalion’s battalion training camp? your vision of this situation. Or are you all looking as described in A.Vorozheykin’s memoirs? So the times are different, and the technique and tactics are far away. But still, what do you think the cover of the airborne crossing in the current realities should look like, describe PLEASE !! !

[Sharapov]

Probably 2-3 kilometers of range for this missile was not enough to fly to London, so it had to be transported somewhere? Why all this? In a combat situation, no one will transport such devices anywhere. This Ministry of Emergency Situations has already gotten it.

[DmitryK]

This is the development of measures during a threatened period or in the face of natural disasters, and therefore the air defense of the crossing is not so relevant.

[Rus2012]

Quote: Sharapov

This Ministry of Emergency Situations has already gotten it.

... and where does the Ministry of Emergencies?
The missile division has its own engineering units.

[bk316]

Think a bit before writing.
1. Do not confuse the Ministry of Emergencies with the Strategic Missile Forces.
2. The complexes are mobile, they ride all the time in order to avoid a preventive strike of the enemy’s ICBMs, and not to get to London 3 km away.
3. In the menacing period BEFORE the impact of the enemy’s ICBMs, saboteurs undermine bridges, sharply reducing the mobility of the systems. Then a blow is struck. If the explosion of bridges does not lead to reduced mobility, then an ICBM strike will be ineffective.
4. So to the heap, although not for you anymore: there is no need to cover the air transport - they are in the depths of our territory.

So see?

[guzik007]

Was there a cover for the crossing from the air?
-------------------------------------------------
-----------
I think that no fools are sitting upstairs. In any case, when we were paving, there were always two silks standing on each side, scuffing their stings through the air, and air defense aircraft were in the air.

[Monos]

Ha! Vata! Look as it should!

[jjj]

Still lower sphincter to insert a rainbow flag

[Starik72]

No, better powder dvigun.

[sir_obs]

No, you can’t clog nozzles, there will be no progress

This is a rehearsal of the moon landing in the Sea of ​​Tranquility

[Banishing liberoids]

Monos - why is it here? post a photo on a porno-th place there.

[Amurets]

Quote: Exorcist Liberoids

Monos - why is it here? post a photo on a porno-th place there.

Ukrainian Navy demonstrates a new, waterproof form and a new pontoon bridge park

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Exorcist Liberoids

post a photo on a porno-th place there.

It will be suitable for geisaite, but normal men don’t go there

[Banishing liberoids]

Alexander Romanov, so, and here is why ??? Let’s cling to each news in the comments, what resource will turn into?

[Venceremos]

Quote: Exorcist Liberoids

Alexander Romanov, so, and here is why ??? Let’s cling to each news in the comments, what resource will turn into?

Didn't notice somehow "inflection"

And actually, what is it about adding to the "dryness of comments" an element of healthy banter?

Sometimes useful, helps defuse the situation ...

[Thor]

Exile, are you afraid of naked ukrodudy ?!

[Venceremos]

Quote: Thor

Exile, are you afraid of naked ukrodudy ?!

Really, homophobes settled on VO

[Thor]

And do not say ...)))

[Venceremos]

Quote: Thor

And do not say ...)))

What can I say? +

[Monos]

Quote: Expelling Liberoids

Monos - why is it here? post a photo on a porno-th place there.

Sergey Vitalievich, smile. Because of this nonsense, you shouldn't "break the spears", really.

[You Vlad]

Monos You just don’t have to be like jumpers! In Ukraine, too, Russian people live and I’m not sure that they would like it! Childhood is the right word

[Monos]

Quote: You Vlad

I'm not sure if they would like it

What is it"? For your information, it is the Ukrainians who express their patriotic feelings. And, frankly, I don't care about the experiences of dill.
Russians live in the Donbass, and on the territory that you are talking about, Svidomo myzdobuly live.

[You Vlad]

The setting is 100% ours! So I say that it is not good to fall to their level. And Ukrainians are not Russians? And there are not so many "svidomye myzdobuly" there as you think, but with such an attitude on our part there will be even more ... Good and understanding on our part will quickly cure this absurd situation

[Monos]

Quote: You Vlad

.Good and understanding from our side ...

Who do you want to cajole? Those who burned people in Odessa; those who called in pure Russian to kill Donbass; those who expressed a desire to destroy Moscow with an atomic bomb; those who promised to drive the Donetsk kids into the cellars; those who squeal "Moskolyak on Gilyak"? Are you encouraging them to placate?
And who do you propose to understand? Admirers of Bandera, zigging fellows and drawing a swastika of Natsik on their bodies? Do you, in general, understand what you are calling us to? You urge us to understand and justify Ukrainian Nazism.
And wouldn’t you go to the field, dear? And take the idiot with the Ukrainian banner, who left his diarrhea below, with you. Talk to him about kindness and understanding. I think he will listen to you carefully, and then he will stick a knife in your back and clean your pockets. With compassionate good-natured always this happens.

[You Vlad]

You dear, you can’t understand me! Besides the sick Natsik’s head in Ukraine, the main population lives, which the Kiev propaganda irones from morning till night, how bad we are! A tired Ukrainian will look at our side and think about it, but the truth is that there’s something wrong with them so! It’s not necessary to complicate complicated relationships so much! Who deserves one way or another to answer, they will get a bullet, either in court or in front of God. Are we poisoned like dogs, isn’t it not clear? Benefit recipient overseas does not rejoice at us pr-in!

[proletarian]

You are GOING Monos, GOING. Although "polkana" and "earned", but with common sense a little tight.

[Tusv]

It is emphasized that "an operation of this magnitude with the building of a bridge for large-sized equipment with a payload of more than 100 tons was carried out for the first time."

And what about the plot on the T channel? Just crossing the 100 ton monster

[Major Yurik]

Of course, it can and should for the experiment, but for the Yars range of 5-6 km it does not matter. If a cabin falls on you in the elevator shaft, then it doesn’t matter from the 15th or 14th floor, the final one!

[Ryabtsev Grigory Evgenievich]

If such an "experiment" was not done at the stage of designing and creating a prototype, then they understood its meaninglessness. And here they just decided to get rid of the motor resource and a lot of money for one thing and show off to the authorities. You look - they will praise.

[Moore]

Quote: Ryabtsev Grigory Evgenievich

If such an "experiment" was not done at the stage of designing and creating a prototype, then they understood its meaninglessness. And here they just decided to get rid of the motor resource and a lot of money for one thing and show off to the authorities. You look - they will praise.

At the "design stage" the complex is designed and not taken by ferries. How do you see it in principle?
What is meaningless in forcing a water barrier on a pontoon if the really existing bridge on the route of combat patrol is destroyed (I hope it is not necessary to explain that the MBPs are calculated and laid on the maximum possible area?)?
In 1986, he himself participated in research exercises on ferrying a missile regiment across the river. Ob. They drove a whole division to the pontoon and drove through the not very narrow Siberian river.
And no one had a thought about the "meaninglessness" of this action, because the point is not whether the missile will reach it or not, but in ensuring the constant maneuvering of the complex, because this is the only way to ensure its security.

[Evgen2x]

The "Yars" has a range of 11 km, if I remember correctly))) to ferry it across the river only for the sake of sporting interest and training of personnel)) will get it even from this bank even from that, and in a nuclear conflict, there is hardly a need to drag the complex across the rivers will be.

[Observer2014]

Evgen2x

The "Yars" has a range of 11 km, if I remember correctly))) to ferry it across the river only for the sake of sporting interest and training of personnel)) will get it even from this bank even from that, and in a nuclear conflict, there is hardly a need to drag the complex across the rivers will be.

And don't tell me! It seems that the Yars tractor is delivering a missile to the target!

[PHANTOM-AS]

Quote: Observer2014

And don't tell me! It seems that the Yars tractor is delivering a missile to the target!

Across rivers o lakes

[lis-ik]

I don’t understand why either? Although if you get away from the answer, then it will do.

[Evgen2x]

we don’t have time to get away, the time of the arrival of not our 8-12 mines, it’s easier to go along the coast)

[Alex_59]

Quote: Evgen2x

we don’t have time to get away, the time of the arrival of not our 8-12 mines, it’s easier to go along the coast)

Half an hour at least. If the bridge is built in advance and the water does not become an obstacle for Poplar during this time, it will creep away by 15-25 kilometers from the enemy’s aiming point. And the radius of fatal destruction of the 300 kT of the warhead of the W78 is about 1,5 km in the open. Conclusion - if there is a bridge, Poplar is alive and can give an answer.

[Evgen2x]

Half an hour ??? 20 min (plus or minus) ballistic from Shashka, much faster from Europe, tomahawk in general options are possible, 20 km from the epicenter of a nuclear explosion I doubt very much that the ground installation will be able to launch, all the same, there is electromagnetic radiation above the roof, but in advance the crossing))) a variant of science fiction)) and then how does anyone know where it shies ?? and which way to build the ferry, so it’s more like sports interest and training of personnel, which by the way is not bad at all.

[bk316]

Do you have anything to do with the army?
US will use about 3Kt warheads for a minuteman missile
Over 20 km, even in an open field, people will not suffer and EMP will not reach at all if the explosion is not high-altitude.

[Alex_59]

Quote: Evgen2x

Half an hour ???

Yes, this is flying time from the USA to the Russian Federation

Quote: Evgen2x

from Europe much faster

Than? RIAC is prohibited. Operational and tactical - only 500 km. How do you want to destroy the strategic missile forces positions in the Kirov region, Saratov, etc. with such weapons? to the East?

Quote: Evgen2x

20 km from the epicenter of a nuclear explosion

In 20 km from the center of the explosion there is only a bright flash and a light gust of wind. But in the radius of 1,5 km everything will be destroyed - the lunar landscape. The power of the shock wave drops to the third degree from the distance from the place of detonation.

[Observer2014]

lis-ik I don’t understand why either?

Although if you get away from the answer, then it will do.

What an answer !!!! If "Yars" bangs there even cockroaches won't survive!
Maximum range 11000 km
Type of head part RGCH IN
Number of warheads 3-4 (+ 4 decoys)
Charge power 150 kt - 300 kt
This is not self-propelled guns and MLRS to hide from the otvetki
Went to reload!

[Alex_59]

Quote: Evgen2x

transport it across the river only for the sake of sports interest and training of personnel

The raison d'être of "Topol" / "Yarsa" is that they are dispersed over a large area and in woodlands during a threatened period. And not only are they spread out, but also constantly change their location. Those. they become targets with coordinates unknown in advance. It is not possible to track them continuously on-line. Therefore, the only option for the enemy to destroy them is to prevent them from scattering and pinning them in a limited, narrow space where they can be easily tracked. For this purpose, the enemy can arrange sabotage by blowing up bridges, etc., thereby narrowing the scope for their maneuver. Is it clear now why a floating bridge might be needed?

[Observer2014]

Alex_59 Quote:

........ the enemy can arrange sabotage with the destruction of bridges, etc. thereby narrowing the scope for their maneuver. It is clear now why a floating bridge may be needed?

The colleague is certainly understandable. Only one thing is not clear. That ours will steadily continue to hide and not press the start button, seeing that bridges are being blown up in the places of Yars deployment ?!

[Alex_59]

Quote: Observer2014

The colleague is certainly understandable. Only one thing is not clear. That ours will steadily continue to hide and not press the start button, seeing that bridges are being blown up in the places of Yars deployment ?!

There are different options. Bridges can begin to explode after the start of an ICBM enemy. And in general, they blew up a couple of bridges - is this a reason for a retaliatory strike? Everything is complicated here. One must be prepared for different scenarios. Here they are getting ready.

[Moore]

Quote: Observer2014

Only one thing is not clear: that ours will steadily continue to hide and not press the start button, seeing that bridges are being blown up in the Yars locations ?!

Excuse me, but do you think that after the first blown up bridge, a massive nuclear missile strike will be inflicted on the adversary? And the men don’t know ... in peacetime they choose some field positions, they are engaged in camouflage ... But you just have to press the button, it turns out!

[Gnufus]

It is correctly noticed, because in the event of the beginning of a DB (war), the enemy will not rely only on high-precision weapons, etc., there will be sabotage, undermining bridges and other important objects. So let them practice.

[katalonec2014]

Quote: Evgen2x

transport it across the river for sporting purposes only

Here the goal was to prove his mobility, the ability to transport even such a "fool" over a water obstacle.

[Observer2014]

katalonec2014

Here the goal was to prove his mobility, the ability to transport even such a "fool" over a water obstacle.

So you persuaded. From now I agree. Just "Yars" for clarity took.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Evgen2x

The "Yars" has a range of 11 km, if I remember correctly))) to ferry it across the river only for the sake of sporting interest and training of personnel)) will get it even from this bank even from that, and in a nuclear conflict, there is hardly a need to drag the complex across the rivers will be.

It’s not a lack of range. They worked out the exit from the permanent deployment point and spreading around the launch areas, as well as maneuvers between the launch areas - when officially there is no war yet, but the DRGs are already rummaging. Or the war has already begun, but the threshold for the application of the NBC has not yet been crossed.
Not so many bridges can withstand the "primer".

[Amurets]

Yesterday showed in Vesti Russia-1. It was really beautiful. Well done!

Unique maneuvers were carried out in the Strategic Missile Forces, during which the launcher of the Yars mobile complex was transported through the deep-water tributaries of the Volga, the press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reports.

[starhina01]

It would be great to see firsthand, well, or a photo on an extreme

[lis-ik]

Yesterday they showed it in Vesti.

[Knowing]

And CHO chat .... they go themselves and do not touch them .....

[cap]

Quote: Knowing

And CHO chat .... they go themselves and do not touch them .....

CHO WANT. AND RECEIVE, RESPONSE.

[askort154]

Evgen2x ........ The "Yars" has a range of 11 km, if I remember correctly))) to ferry it across the river only for the sake of sports interest and training of personnel)) will get it even from this bank even from that, but if a nuclear conflict will hardly need to drag the complex across the rivers.

It is also not clear. Apparently the next "dvigun" will be - "White Swans" are sailing along the Volga. For the first time, a panton crossing of the Tu-160 strategic bomber was carried out across the Volga River.

[Voyager]

In my opinion, a lot of movements were to create a bridge. I don’t know how to improve the process, not a professional. But the target guys were noble

[bk316]

Gentlemen, comrades, what is the matter with you today? You don’t read the article to the end, you didn’t go through the KMB, and it seems that you didn’t even visit OBZ but are already commenting.

1. Yars all the time moving not to drive closer to the target, but to prevent the enemy’s ICBMs from entering it.
2. The positional areas of Yars far from the borders of the plane will not fly and the ax too.
3. Yarses cannot go where they want, the routes follow special roads, so if the bridge on the route is destroyed, there is nowhere to turn.
4. An explosion of a minuteman’s warhead over 5 km will destroy both the launcher and crew, an explosion over 20 km will not even hurt.
5. Engineering support of the Strategic Missile Forces is engaged in itself, without the Ministry of Emergencies and in general anyone.
6. Before a preventive strike, the enemy’s RDGs will try to destroy our launchers, but since they are mobile and move along a fairly large territory along an unknown route, stationary objects, most likely bridges, will be destroyed in order to reduce mobility.

Therefore, what is described in the article is being done. I could ask the author some real questions, but they can’t be answered anyway.

[taseka]

Hooray! Russian engineering troops !!!

[Alex_59]

Quote: taseka

Hooray! Russian engineering troops !!!

Only in the picture, which is characteristic, is neither Yars nor Poplar. And what you see is a technical closure machine, part-time tanker, a mass-dimensional analogue of the launcher, and a means of disinformation of the enemy (from space it looks like a real PU). But once the tractor was transported, that means they can.

[taseka]

That's good! A start!!!

[Former battalion commander]

First, they came up with and implemented the STUPID concept of "mobile soil complexes". When it turned out that ALL the mobility of these complexes is limited to a diameter of 200-250 km and finding such a complex in the forest for a radar in space does not constitute ANY problem, they began to feverishly look for a way out. Then it was additionally found out (of course, at the very beginning of the development they could not have foreseen this) their absolute VULNERABILITY from both a nuclear strike and from ORDINARY means and EVEN just sabotage groups with sniper rifles urgently began by all means to try to make this vulnerable concept more or less combat-ready. For this, the "smart guys" first made INFLATABLE MODELS of these complexes. Then, when it turned out that these mock-ups were easily recognized by radar from satellites, they began to fence vegetable gardens with shelters in the positional area in the form of camouflage nets of sheds and other crap that did not solve the problem of vulnerability. Now, judging by the article, they are trying to expand the possible patrol area by ferrying these complexes where there are no roads. And I had no idea that all this can be seen from space. Who else has such complexes? The answer is NOBODY except the Chinese! It seems to indicate the UNIQUE and EFFICIENCY of this weapon! BUT! It's like the Elusive Joe, why is he so elusive? Because no one needs FUCK! The Chinese use their PGRK only FROM stationary tunnels PREPARED IN THE MOUNTAINS, invulnerable neither for nuclear weapons, nor for conventional weapons, nor for sabotage groups. And from one tunnel to another they move when spies do not hang satellites above them. And when the PGRK arrives at a new location in the next tunnel, you can no longer see it. Do you feel the difference in RELIABILITY and SECURITY, plus the UNCERTAINTY of the location of the complexes in Russia and China? Now children of PGRK are like a suitcase without a handle for Russia - and there's no sense in them and it's a pity to leave ...