The Palestinian problem and the question of the survival of Israel in the future

61
The Palestinian problem and the question of the survival of Israel in the future

The Palestinian problem is one of the “powder kegs” that can blow up the entire region. Already, Israel is in a very difficult position, having not only traditional opponents, but also a constant tendency to worsen relations with Egypt and Turkey. In addition, there are regular calls from the UN and from Western Europe to recognize a Palestinian state. Israel may soon be completely isolated, especially dangerous if the United States solves only its problems and “forgets” its ally.

Firstly, it should be noted that Palestine is a geographical concept, historical a geographical area in the Middle East that covers roughly the territory of modern Israel, the Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights, the West Bank and parts of Jordan. This name comes from the word "Philistia", a land inhabited by the tribes of the Philistines of the Phoenicians (the ancient people of sailors, merchants and warriors). In addition, this land was called "Canaan," "Syria Palestinian."

Secondly, the Palestinian Arabs, like the Jews, are not the indigenous people of this territory, through which a mass of tribes and nationalities passed. Semites (Arabs and Jews) had a common ancestral home - the steppe and desert of Arabia. The phrase "Palestinian people", which the Arabs use, is nonsense, like the "Caucasian people." "Palestinian" can be called any inhabitant of this geographic territory - Arab, Jew, Circassian, Greek, Russian, and so on. There is no "Palestinian language" or "Palestinian culture." Arabs speak a dialect of Arabic ("Syrian" dialect). The same language is spoken by the Arabs of Syria, Lebanon and the Kingdom of Jordan. Thus, it is necessary to understand that the Arabs are not "indigenous people", "natives", whose lands have enslaved "insidious Jews." They are the same aliens as the Jews. Palestinian Arabs have no more rights to these lands than Jews.

Thirdly, there was no special “Palestinian Arab state”, no one “occupied” it. Since ancient times in Palestine, there were city-states, there lived various tribes, nationalities, the territory was part of the various empires of antiquity. During the "Semitization" of the Middle East, the Arabs did not create their own states.

After a period of Arab conquest - the 7-8 centuries, these territories were part of a huge empire - the Arab caliphate with its capital in Damascus and then in Baghdad. In the second half of the 11 century, the region was conquered by Seljuk Turks. The “Knights of Christ”, the Crusaders, were also noted here. After the exile of the Crusaders, these territories were part of the Mamluk Egypt. Later, these lands were part of the huge Ottoman Empire - up to the 1917 year. Palestine at that time was not particularly interested in anyone (except for Christian pilgrims), Christians and Jews lived in settlements, Muslims (not always Arabs) were engaged in semi-nomadic cattle breeding. Only at the end of the 17th century of the 19th century, the region, and not Palestine itself, but the entire Middle East, began to attract great powers - France, Britain, Russia, Austria-Hungary, later Germany, Italy. The "Eastern question" arose - it was connected with the control over the holy places in Palestine, the national liberation struggle of the Christian peoples and the problem of dividing the weakening Ottoman Empire.

From the end of the 19 century, the beginning of the settlement of Palestine by European Jews, followers of the ideology of Zionism (a political movement that advocated the unification and revival of the Jewish people in the "historic homeland" - Israel).

Palestine in the 20 century

Defeated in World War I in 1917, the decrepit Ottoman Empire collapsed. A significant part of its territory fell under the control of the French and British. For Palestine, the United Kingdom received the mandate in April 1920 at the conference in San Remo. The League of Nations in 1922 approved this mandate. Jordan was also part of the British Mandate of Palestine.

On November 2 on November 1917, the British Foreign Minister Arthur Balfour handed over to the famous Jewish banker, Lord Walter Rothschild, a document that went down in the history of the 20th century as the "Balfour Declaration." In this letter, the head of the British Foreign Ministry expressed sympathy for the “Zionist aspirations of the Jews” and announced that the government approves the “question of creating a national center for the Jewish people in Palestine” and will make “all efforts” to this. It should be noted that the Rothschild banking house during the war of Britain provided multi-million dollar military loans and was an active organizer of the creation of the “Jewish hearth”.

The British had to create two states: to the west of the Jordan, the Jewish, and to the east of the Jordan - the Arab. This decision caused a significant influx of Jewish immigrants. Although the majority still preferred to go to the USA, and not to the bare desert. By the beginning of the 1940-s in Palestine, there were already about 450 thousand Thousands of Jews. The Second World War caused another wave of Jewish migration - the number of Jews by 1947 had grown to 650 thousand.

It is clear that the influx of Jews caused friction between them and Muslims. So in the 1936 — 1939 years there was an Arab uprising. And it cannot be said that the “Jewish invaders” are to blame for everything. The Jews were carriers of a developed "productive mode of management." Mostly working people came to Palestine, who actually founded a farm from scratch (the more “cunning” people were looking for happiness in the USA). A number of researchers cite the facts that the Arab sector of Mandatory Palestine was developing more intensively - the average growth rate was 4,5% than the neighboring Arab territories and states. The Jews gave the opportunity to join the more modern methods of management, such as intensive irrigation, cultivation of citrus crops, poultry and cattle, etc. But the Arabs did not want to change their habitual way of life.

It must be said that this information seems to be correct, since modern Arab states are mostly preferred and prefer to parasitize on hydrocarbons, other natural resources, natural beauties and cultural achievements of previous civilizations (developing tourism). Yes, and do not like to work. For example, the economies of the Gulf monarchies are based on labor laborers from the countries of South Asia and a number of other regions. A recent example of the death of the Libyan Jamahiriya showed that the local population preferred to idle, visitors from a number of countries in Africa and Europe worked. Europeans do not pay attention to this, as well as to the medieval character of the monarchical Arab regimes, the main thing is that resources flow continuously.

Therefore, the “innocent sheep” of the Arabs is not worth doing. There is also the fact that at the initial stage, when there were not many Jewish settlers, their settlement was a tasty object for robbery raids, and this is one of the most ancient Arab crafts. It is clear that gradually the balance of power has changed, the Jews could answer harshly.

Jewish settlers brought progress to the impoverished region of the planet, were employers and buyers. From the Jewish international organizations to Palestine flowed money that was spent on infrastructure development. It is clear that caused the influx of the Arab population from neighboring areas, for the first 20-year of the British Mandate, Palestine arrived before 400 thousand Arabs. And by the time of the proclamation of the state of Israel in Palestine, 1948 already had more than 1 million Arabs (there are no exact data, so the figures are given in 750-900 thousand people). In principle, this fact is also not surprising - in recent decades, thousands and thousands of Arabs, representatives of the Black Continent and Asia have come to Europe (and continue to go). They are attracted by a higher standard of living. Moreover, a significant part of migrants prefer to live without complicating their existence with the problems of work, they exist on all sorts of benefits, “extra money”, often of a criminal and semi-criminal nature. And Russia in the past two decades has received this sad experience, when millions of migrants from the South Caucasus, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia flowed into the Russian Federation.

Creation of israel

In the 1947, London "washed its hands", refused the mandate for Palestine, arguing that he was not able to find an acceptable solution for Arabs and Jews. In November, the UN adopted a partition plan for Palestine (UNGA Resolution No. 181). The decision envisaged the creation of two states on the Palestinian territory: Arab and Jewish. Jerusalem and Bethlehem, according to the decision of the United Nations, were to become a territory under international control, in order to prevent conflict over the status of these cities. Two superpowers — the USSR and the USA — supported this plan. Thus, the Arabs received not only Transjordan (a state on the east bank of the Jordan), but also a significant part of the inhabited (not taking into account the absolutely lifeless Negev desert in the south of the country) Palestinian territory. The Jews agreed with this decision, and the Arabs (including the League of Arab States and the Palestinian Supreme Arab Council) categorically refused to accept the UN plan. They stated that this decision violates the rights of the majority of Palestinians - it was 67% composed of non-Jews. Arabs in general believed that Jews should not be allowed to create their own state on “their” land.

14 May 1948, one day before the end of the British mandate for Palestine, David Ben-Gurion (leader of the Jewish labor movement in Mandatory Palestine, one of the founders and first head of the government of the State of Israel) announced the creation of an independent Jewish state in the territory allocated according to the plan UN. The next day, the Arab League declared war on Israel and immediately five Arab countries (Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Transjordan, Egypt), plus the armed forces of the Palestinian Arabs attacked a new country. Thus began the First Arab-Israeli War, in Israel it was called the “War of Independence”.

The Arabs were defeated. Approximately 600 of thousands of Arabs became refugees. At the same time, anti-Jewish demonstrations took place in Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Libya and other Arab countries and brutal pogroms were organized. As a result, more than 800 thousand Jews became refugees and took the place of the Palestinian Arabs. In July 1949, a cease-fire agreement was adopted, the Western Galilee and the corridor from the coastal plain to Jerusalem were now under the control of the Jews; Jerusalem was divided along the ceasefire line between Israel and Transjordan. The State of Israel has occupied 80% of Palestinian territory. The Arab state was not created due to the Egyptian occupation of the Gaza Strip and the seizure, and then the Transjordan annexation of most of the land of Judea and Samaria (they were intended for the Arab state). Jordan also captured East Jerusalem, which was to remain under UN control in the framework of Greater Jerusalem. These lands, after their annexation, were called Transjordan “West Bank of the Jordan River”, in contrast to its original territory east of the Jordan River, after which it was independently renamed Jordan.

As a result, the Arabs themselves have buried the possibility of creating another Arab state:

- They abandoned the UN plan, although it was supported by two leading world powers - the Soviet Union, and Stalin played a huge role in the creation of the Israeli state, and the United States.

- They denied the Jews the right to their state. Although “Palestine was not an“ Arab ”territory. They themselves attacked Israel, arrogantly, and boasting is the hallmark of the Arabs, thinking that they would resolve the issue by military means. As a result, miscalculated and defeated.

- Egypt and Jordan themselves occupied the territories that were intended for the Palestinian Arab state, thus burying the possibility of its creation in the near future.

Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Arab-Israeli conflict

In the future, the Arabs did not carry out the work necessary errors and in the year 1964 created an organization with the aim of "liberating Palestine." The Palestinian Charter became the main policy document of the PLO, which was adopted by the Palestinian National Council in Cairo in 1968. The Charter envisaged the elimination of the State of Israel, the complete elimination of the Zionist presence in Palestine. Palestine was viewed as an “indivisible regional entity within the borders that existed under the British Mandate”; nothing was said about the “Jordanian occupation” of the Palestinian territories. It was headed for confrontation.

The organization was going armed to expel the Jews from Palestine. The first chairman of the PLO executive committee, Ahmed Shukeyri (1964 — 1967), said: “After our victory, we will help the surviving Jews return to where they came from. But I doubt that someone will survive. ” Prior to 1988, this organization was considered a terrorist, only this year, Yasser Arafat (the third chairman of the PLO Executive Committee - 1969 - 2004) announced the recognition of the right of the State of Israel to exist and abandoned terrorist methods of struggle.

Israel has become a major irritant for the Arab world. During the confrontation, a whole chain of wars took place: 1956 year - Suez crisis, 1967 year - Six-day war, 1967 — 1970 years - War of attrition (war of low intensity between Egypt and Israel over the Sinai Peninsula), 1982 year - Lebanon war, 2006 year - Second Lebanon War. And this is not counting various conflicts, sabotage, terrorist attacks, disputes, border incidents, etc. At the present time, experts have started talking about the possibility of a new big Arab-Israeli war, or Israel’s war with Iran (with or without Arab countries).

OOP before its "handshake" has experienced a number of interesting "adventures." After Israel established its control over all of Palestine in the Six Day War of 1967, PLO militants fled to Jordan, where they created a "state in the state", a real terrorist enclave, relying on hundreds of thousands of refugees whom Arafat promised to arm if Jordan King Hussein will try to pacify the organization. In 1968, the PLO entered into an open alliance with three groups that were illegal in Jordan - the Arab National Movement, Baathists and Communists. The union planned to overthrow King Hussein and establish a new political regime on the East Bank of the Jordan River. In 1970, the patience of the Jordanian government snapped - martial law was introduced in the country, the war began. Interestingly, Israel was ready to support Jordan. As a result of "the events of Black September 1970" Tanks the regular army of the Hashemite kingdom was literally crushed by the PLO. Arafat and his fighters fled to Lebanon.

By 1971, the PLO brought the country under its control, and created a new terrorist state entity. As a result, over the course of several years, a prosperous state - "Middle Eastern Switzerland", turned into a battlefield. Lebanese Christians and Shia Muslims were hit by PLO gangsters. Israeli territory was also attacked. In 1975, civil war broke out, and pro-government militias (mostly Christians) fought against PLO militants, other Palestinian, Muslim and leftist organizations. Tens of thousands of people died, and the Palestinian Arab detachments were particularly brutal towards the indigenous Christian population of Lebanon. Gangsters staged real acts of genocide, killing women and children.

Syrian President Hafez Asad (head of state from 1971 to 2000 years) was initially benevolent to the PLO, but then moved to the side of the Christians. Syria sent troops to Lebanon. Conducted a series of operations in Lebanon against the Palestinians, interacting with Lebanese Christians, and Israel. In 1982, Arafat and the PLO fled to Tunisia, the USA and Europeans contributed to this (apparently having views of this terrorist organization).

Tunisia did not allow the PLO to roam in the Jordanian or Lebanese pattern. But, thanks to the help of Iran and Saudi Arabia, Yasser Arafat managed to recreate the movement of Palestinian resistance in exile.

At present, the Palestinian problem is again threatening to undermine the peace in the Middle East, which is already hanging in the balance. In 2011, more than 120 of the UN member states recognized the statehood of Palestine. October 31 UNESCO General Conference voted to admit Palestine to this organization. The main opponents of the recognition of Palestine are Israel and the United States.

Some results. About the future of Russian-Israeli relations

- The conflict between Israel and the Arab (Muslim) world is not based on the ownership of Palestine. The Arabs have 23 states, a vast territory with more than 345 million population, compared with which Palestine is without oil, gas and even water, a negligible amount. This is a conflict between Judaism and Islam, Semitic Arabs and Semitic Jews, different worldviews.

- The Palestinian question has nothing to do with the struggle that does not exist, the so-called. "Palestinian people", or "re-creation" of a "Palestinian state", which was not in nature. These are just cover words. This is a continuation of the Arab battle for supremacy over the Middle East and North Africa (the idea of ​​the “Great Caliphate”) against the “infidels” (Jews and Christians).

- Do not make the Palestinian Arabs "innocent victims", and from the Jews "invaders." Both sides have a lot of sins. Apparently, the post-Stalinist USSR made a mistake, focusing only on the Arab world. Huge funds were invested in the Arabs, efforts were made, but there was little sense in it. Stalin was not a fool, contributing to the creation of Israel. This state plays the role of a buffer, a “lightning rod,” assuming the drive of the Arab world. Thousands of radical Muslims who could fight in Europe, in the Caucasus, Central Asia, in India, against China, are chained to Israel.

- In recent years, the tendency towards a “sink” by the United States (the West as a whole) of Israel is clearly visible. He has already remained in isolation, Iran, Egypt (was recently neutral), Turkey (a former ally of Jerusalem) are against him, words of condemnation come from Europe. Preparations for the new Arab-Israeli war (or the Muslim-Israeli war, with the participation of Iran or Turkey) are underway. This world crisis and war in the Middle East can kill Israel. The bad news is that Israel is being pushed into war by Jewish leaders who have the idea of ​​"Great Israel" in their heads. But there is also a "party of common sense", it is desirable that pragmatists, rationalists should take the upper hand.

- In this situation, the idea of ​​Stalin can be embodied, Israel will become an ally of Great Russia. Culturally, linguistically, given the growth factor of the influence of the community of Russian Jews, Israel may well become the “16 Republic” of the Eurasian Union. For this, Jerusalem needs to distance itself from the United States, not to provoke supporters of the war. The union with Russia guarantees the Jews the existence of their “national homeland”. Arabs will be forced to accept. They have enough territory to build their own “imperious formation” (according to Andrei Fursov).

“In addition, I must say that secular regimes, like Syrian regimes, are more beneficial for Israel.” The collapse of Syria, the victory of the Sunni Islamists there, will lead to the threat of opening the Syrian front. Israel, if it wants to survive, should not help London and Washington in building the Great Caliphate. Helping the Anglo-Saxons in this matter, Jerusalem is digging its own grave.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    17 January 2012 09: 14
    Look how the Middle Eastern tangle is twisted.
  2. kotmster
    -1
    17 January 2012 10: 23
    The most offensive thing is that all those people (Jews) who were "swept over the promised" are run by bankers from Europe and the United States. In this case, the people of Israel are just a pawn, "cannon fodder" for the same Yankees ... how they do not understand this!
  3. -4
    17 January 2012 10: 38
    This had to be thought out, on the lands of more than 1000 years belonging to the Arabs, create a Jewish state! It was not difficult to guess where this would lead. It’s about how to create a Finno-Ugric state on the territory of the Vladimir or Yaroslavl region, but on the grounds that once there, under Tsar Gorokh, Finno-Ugric tribes lived.
    1. +2
      17 January 2012 11: 48
      Read the travel notes of Mark Twain (who does not have a special love for Jews), and then write nonsense.
      1. serge
        +3
        17 January 2012 19: 46
        Professor
        Read the travel notes of Mark Twain (not particularly fond of Jews)
        --------------------------------------
        He killed on the spot. Samuel (or Samuel there) Clemens (aka Mark (!) Twain) did not like Jews. And his brother was called Orion (typically an English name).
        Quotes from Mark Twain's "anti-Semite":
        "Jews make up no more than one percent of the human race ... The place that he occupies in trade cannot be compared with his share in the world's population. His contribution to the list of prominent figures in literature, science and art, music and finance is not worth not in any proportion with his small numbers. He can be proud of himself, and we would forgive him for that ...
        A Jew saw everyone, defeated everyone, and now he is the same as he always was ...
        Jewish success is simply the result of Jews being good citizens, good family men, intelligent and engrossed in work. There are no criminals and drunks among them ... "
        (Harper's Magazine, from Mark Twain's Essay on the Jews, March 1898)
        I recommend reading the entire essay. This is a real anthem to the Jews.
        1. +2
          17 January 2012 21: 58
          He killed on the spot. Samuel (or Samuel there) Clemens (aka Mark (!) Twain) did not like Jews. And his brother was called Orion (typically an English name).
          Quotes from Mark Twain's "anti-Semite":

          God, what ignorance ...
          Is Abraham Lincoln a Jew too? And St. Isaac's Cathedral Synagogue?
          Samuel Langhorne Clemens aka Mark Twain was born into the family of John Marshall Clemens (well, a real Jew fellow ) and Jane Lampton Clemens (maiden name Virginian), brothers Orion, Henry, Benjamin (almost like Benjamin Franklin's "Jew"?), Pleasant and sisters Pamela, Margaret. And here is the grave of Mark Twain and the cemetery where he is buried. For some reason, six-pointed stars are not visible.
          http://www.360cities.net/image/mark-twain-grave-clemens-headstone-usa#204.90,-90



          . 00,70.0






          As I understand it, you have not read Twain's "travel notes", but you have already come to conclusions ...
          I recommend also reading the biographer of Napoleon Bonaparte about their campaign in the Middle East, very informative.
          1. Odesit
            -5
            17 January 2012 22: 12
            Jews residing in Europe and America are often not identifiable by first and last name!
            Possibility of identification is left only by the appearance and "other" signs indicating their origin!
            It is no secret that a large number of Jews officially converted to other faiths in order to adapt to the countries of residence and gain access to higher spheres, while continuing to practice Judaism in secret!
            So that your arguments are not convincing professor.
            1. 0
              17 January 2012 22: 17
              Identification leaves only appearance

              For example, this representative: (Bar Rafaeli) What are the hallmarks of a Jewess?


              Not a secret,

              If not a secret, then where are the examples?
              1. Odesit
                -7
                17 January 2012 22: 55
                Professor !
                Do you know any examples of "cross" ?!
                Either you do not want to speak in essence, or you are openly engaged in misinformation!
          2. Odesit
            -4
            17 January 2012 23: 20
            The story of the beautiful Rebekah from the novel "Ivanhoe" by Sir Walter Scott does not inspire me much!
            Such women caused much misfortune to anyone!
            The photo of this girl once again shows how Jews can "modernize"!
            This is the danger!
            After all, a real Jew is considered to be one whose mother is Jewish! Here is the danger!
            1. serge
              -4
              17 January 2012 23: 54
              So after all, the mother can be Jewish, and the father is a white person. This often happens. To improve heredity. "Father" - a Jew may not know.
              Hence the eyes are gray with blue. Some signs of a Jewess are:
              Cold face. "Glass gaze". The darkness of freckles. We have on television now the darkness of such beauties with a fishy gaze. In general, there are a lot of photos of this model on the network, more indicative of these signs.
              However, if you don’t look closely, you can take for a white woman.
              Such non-human facial expressions are distinguished with a minimum of facial muscles.
              I wonder what kind of genetics she has. Surely there are signs from several races.
              The fact that the Jews push such characters for their own is an inferiority complex still breaks out among them. Their own among strangers.
              1. Odesit
                -7
                18 January 2012 00: 04
                I press your hand SERGE! Absolutely true observation!
                Crossing with the Jews leads to a disaster for the nations!
                Long live the Pale of Settlement! Long live the Inquisition! Long live the wise Mr. Eichmann!
              2. 0
                18 January 2012 00: 24
                and what is your opinion))) perky .. probably
                1. The comment was deleted.
    2. ivachum
      +2
      17 January 2012 13: 08
      This is exactly what the international "humanitarian" organizations want from us. And also the revival of the Nogai state (khanate), the Pomor republic (the Pomors did not seem to have any statehood at all), etc. But the Jewish state on these lands already existed in antiquity. So, the question is not entirely correct ... wink
    3. Insurgent
      +2
      17 January 2012 23: 31
      If you are so sympathetic to the Arabs, can you settle somewhere in Syria, or Egiret?
  4. denis29_82
    -2
    17 January 2012 10: 41
    Israel is a detonator. Artificial state. When necessary, then they will undermine. A narrow strip of land with people whom half the world hates.
    1. ivachum
      +5
      17 January 2012 13: 09
      All states, one way or another, are artificial formations.
  5. neodymium
    +1
    17 January 2012 11: 35
    The theme of Zionism is not at all touched upon.
    Where did the state come from, why did the Jews begin to gather in the late 19th century?
    Why are natives not considered indigenous?

    In Soviet times, we were always on the side of the Arabs, why?

    What is Zionism in the film: "Zionism, secret and overt".
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmcjZsgA-CQ
    Despite the fact that the film was commissioned by the Central Committee of the CPSU, it was never shown on television or at the box office.
    1. ivachum
      +6
      17 January 2012 13: 11
      Because the USA supported Israel. If they then began to support the Arabs, the USSR, in contrast, would begin to help Israel. Policy. GREAT policy. And very smelly .....
      1. neodymium
        0
        17 January 2012 14: 09
        If my grandmother would have ...
        The fact of the matter is that the United States would never go against Israel.
        Kennedy was the last to try when he sharply objected to Israel’s acquisition of nuclear weapons technology from France.
        Kennedy, however, also suggested making the state bank out of the Fed ...

        There is nothing immoral in supporting the Arabs; this is ideology.
        It is immoral when:
        Muslims fight with Muslims at the direction of Pindostana.
        -When the United States, speaking about the Taliban "they are not our enemies", regularly receive the coffins of their soldiers from Afgan.
        -When drug trafficking wins in their fight against drug trafficking.
  6. +4
    17 January 2012 11: 45
    A very good article. Everything is written correctly.
  7. denis29_82
    +2
    17 January 2012 11: 46
    About how everyone is minus) Well, it’s like there are many fighters from the coast of one warm sea)))
    1. ivachum
      +8
      17 January 2012 13: 17
      Like it not, Jews, nevertheless wink closer to Europe. Or are you prettier than the Arabs? There were no Jewish militants in Chechnya (although money, yes), but there are a lot of Arab militants. But on the side of the federals ... for example, Rokhlin.
  8. polukazak1
    +5
    17 January 2012 12: 01
    The topic for discussion is slippery, and our former compatriots in the "Promised Land" are not few. The peoples will make peace someday - the neighbors are all the same
    1. forkboy
      +1
      18 January 2012 21: 05
      Our compatriots Israel will set the right track, instill the Russian spirit in the old bike:

      We are talking about the times when there were no Russian-speaking interviewers in the Israeli military registration and enlistment offices, but there were already Russian conscripts. Due to the fact that they were mostly poor in Hebrew, girls interviewers often sent them to the so-called "mental health officers" (specializing in psychologists or social workers) for testing, so that they would check, just in case. the order of the taciturn recruit. By the way, the officer of mental health - "ktsin shave nefesh" - is abbreviated in Hebrew as "boar". Although this, of course, has nothing to do with his professional qualities.
      The mental health officer at the recruiting office usually conducts standard tests - "draw a man, draw a tree, draw a house." Using these tests, you can easily explore the inner world of the future soldier. What is good about them is that they are universal and do not depend on knowledge of the language. Everybody can draw a house. And so another Russian boy, who speaks Hebrew badly, was sent to one officer. The Mental Health Officer greeted him, pulled up a piece of paper and asked him to draw a tree.

      The Russian boy drew poorly, but was well-read. He decided to compensate for the lack of artistic ability by the amount of detail. Therefore, he depicted an oak, a chain on an oak, and a cat on a chain. I see, huh?
      The mental health officer pulled the sheet toward him. On the sheet was a goat, not very cleverly hanging on a branch. The booger used a chain as a rope.
      - What's this? the boar asked affectionately.
      The Russian boy tensed and began to translate. A cat in Hebrew is "khatul". "Scientist" - mad'an, with a Russian accent - "madan". The boy did not know that in this case the word "scientist" would have sounded differently - the cat is not an employee of the Academy of Sciences, but simply knows a lot, that is, the word needs a different one. But nothing else happened. The boy scratched his head and answered the officer's question:
      - Khatul Madan.
      The officer was Israeli. Therefore, the given phrase meant to him something like "a cat engaged in scientific activity." Hatul madan. Why a booger hanging from a tree is engaged in scientific activity, and what this scientific activity is, the officer could not understand.
      “What is he doing?” the officer asked tensely.
      (The image of suicide in a projective test is generally a very bad sign).
      “And this depends on when,” the boy rejoiced at the opportunity to show his intellect. - Now, if it goes here (an arrow appeared to the right side of the booger), then it sings songs. And if here (the arrow followed to the left), then it tells tales.
      - To whom? - the boar wept.
      The boy tried and remembered:
      - To myself.
      At the tales that the hanged boogie tells herself, the mental health officer felt unwell. He scheduled another interview with the boy and let him go home. The picture with the oak remained on the table.
      When the boy left, the boar called his secretary to him - he wanted a fresh look at the situation.
      Secretary of Mental Health Officer was a smart adequate girl. But she, too, recently came from Russia.
      The boss showed her a picture. The girl saw in the picture a tree with carved leaves and a cat-like animal walking along a chain.
      - What do you think, is that? asked the officer.
      “Khatul madan,” the secretary answered.
      Hastily exposing the girl and drinking cold water, the boar called to the next floor, where his young colleague worked. He asked to come down to consult a difficult case.
      “Here,” a tired professional sighed. “I have known you for a long time, you are a normal person.” Please explain to me what is depicted here?
      The problem is that a colleague was also from Russia ...
      But then the boar decided not to back down.
      - Why? - quietly, but passionately, he asked his colleague. - WHY is this - Khatul Madan?
      - So it's obvious! - a colleague jabbed a finger at the drawing .- See these arrows? They mean that when the khatul goes to the right, he sings. And when to the left ...

      I can’t say whether the army psychologist went crazy and what diagnosis he was given to the boy. But today, almost all mental health officers know: if a draftee draws oaks with animals on chains on a test, then he is from Russia. There, they say, all are educated. Even a cat
  9. thatupac
    0
    17 January 2012 15: 54
    Great article. I drew up a lot of new things. I can’t stand this Israel. All the time, the local Russian Jews tell us here on the forums and in the guest rooms that their IDF is an ideal Army to be called up. That they, unlike the "decaying rash," do not have hazing (as if). That they have an Army - this is honor and dignity, and we have a way of destroying the able-bodied male population and legalized conscription slavery of soldiers for cannon fodder at a cost, in in particular and against the civilian population (a hint of BB, where I served, goats like that). That they have a super-duper technique there, with the help of which they have already come almost all the Arabs in the district more than once (yeah, the propaganda is frail , does not shake). That nuclear weapons, money dofiga, God-chosen people, in contrast to the eternally worker-peasant-serf Russians. That in general they tryndets there are plows of the whole world ... lol

    Forgetting, at the same time, that all this is thanks to their senior friend, the United States. Without which, this Israel would have long been in ruins and under the feet of the Arabs, and the heads of the Jews would have long been flaunted stuck on the gates of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Therefore, they have a draft army, so that if something happens, when the Tryn’s union with the USA comes to them, so that this Tryndec doesn’t get close to them imperceptibly. In short: I would like this Israel to have Arabs, and for us, Russia, there was nothing wrong with that wink . Somehow it turns out.
  10. +1
    17 January 2012 16: 24
    no hazing


    It is true - it is not in the IDF. That is, there is still a part of hazing, but it is legalized: the old-timers get fewer outfits. There is no muzzle attack (single cases are severely punished). Well, if any officer did not keep track of or do not let him hide cases of "non-statutory" (by the way, there is no charter either), then this officer instantly leaves the army.

    Forgetting, at the same time, that all this is thanks to their senior friend, the United States.

    Firstly, everyone remembers American aid well; Secondly, its scale is greatly exaggerated. For example, only Egypt, not Israel’s best friend, receives exactly the same amount of American assistance as Israel.

    Therefore, they have a draft army, so that if something happens, when the Tryn’s union with the USA comes to them, so that this Tryndec doesn’t get close to them imperceptibly.

    Logical thread is missing.

    In short: I would like this Israel to have Arabs, and for us, Russia, there was nothing wrong with that

    It looks like a New Year's toast. wink
    1. thatupac
      +4
      17 January 2012 16: 49
      Are you by any chance this one, a Jew from "abroad"? There is no hazing, because the mentality is different, the country is small (in fact, everyone knows each other) + their service in the Army is a job, as in the USSR it is practice after studying at a university. And also because there everyone is knocking on each other, as in the days of Stalin in the late 30s. You won't turn around especially: if someone snitches on someone, then he knows that the one he snitched on will surely snit on him, because you can think of compromising evidence + dofig + (friend-witnesses will pull up brotherly). Help is not exaggerated. She is very much even hoo-hoo (in particular in the form of outright protectionism). There is a logical thread. If the Arabs break through the Jewish "cordon", it is important for the Jews that every inhabitant of the country can fight back. And not like our mothers-little girls, who can hait the Army, and if something happens to the enemies only with a rolling pin-cooker - and shkers into the basement. New Year's post? Nope, just a wish. In my opinion, I correctly spread it out for you, a lover of the Jewish "prypuganda".
      1. Insurgent
        +1
        17 January 2012 23: 36
        Can you imagine if our soldiers were given weapons on vacation?
        1. thatupac
          +1
          18 January 2012 10: 44
          If our soldiers were given weapons on vacation, then we would have a new criminal business for seizing these weapons from such an unlucky soldier, with subsequent purchase / sale to various organizations (in particular organized crime groups or abroad). It is impossible to do in our country, as in the same Israel or Switzerland.
  11. -1
    17 January 2012 16: 58
    Are you by any chance this one, a Jew from "abroad"?

    Though a pot name only do not put in the stove. fellow

    There is no hazing. (point) what

    If the Arabs break through the Jewish "cordon"

    Mixed up nothing?

    In my opinion, I correctly spread it out for you, a lover of the Jewish "prypuganda".

    More or less.

    You don’t want to go to the discussion of technology;
    1. thatupac
      -2
      17 January 2012 17: 59
      In short, as I understood that you are one of those blockheads who are told that two and two equals four, they explain this to you, but you still insist that there will be five, not four, and for you it is ironclad. Like peas against the wall. 100%. With these it is clear. There is hazing there. Just not like us, based on indifference. And you don't even need to beat for this. It's just that the more senior on the call will always pass on the dirtier and more boring work to the younger call, somewhere to hint that the junior will replace the senior. This is how it is done in all teams. And it is useless to argue here. I did not confuse anything there. The terrorist attacks by Hezbollah, Hamas and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade in Israel prove just that. Switch to technology? Heh, why would I go over when you still haven't answered my question: "Where are you from? Israel?" Only from there such rabid "blockheads", defending everything that is Jewish, write that way, knowing that it will not work for people like me from Russia to personally check, and you can hang your propaganda "noodles" with ease. For you have your own "sect" there, not the state. So where are you from, huh?
  12. +1
    17 January 2012 18: 20
    1. I am not from Israel if it matters to you.
    2. Well, there is no hazing in our understanding of the word in the IDF, in the evening in the barracks no "grandfathers" build young people ... Theses have been written about the reasons for the absence of this phenomenon.
    It’s just that the older call will always pass the more dirty and boring work to the younger call, hint somewhere that the younger senior will replace it.

    And this is not. Nobody "replaces" grandfathers. They are simply entitled to fewer outfits for seniority (and as a rule, they are not supposed to be in the kitchen at all), but those outfits that they still rely on are 100% made.

    If the Arabs break through the Jewish "cordon"

    And yet they mixed it up, it’s an Arabian cordon. It is Israel that is surrounded by hostile states, and not vice versa.

    protecting their own, Jewish, they write like that, knowing that it will not work for people like me from Russia to personally verify,

    Well, all right, everything is Jewish, as well as German, American and further down the list ... wink
    At the expense of checking with your own eyes, so you no longer need visas, you can come and see. In general, read more and not only "Soviet" newspapers.
    1. Odesit
      -6
      17 January 2012 22: 16
      OUR THREATY IDF DOES NOT GIVE UP THE ENEMY - THANKS NO WHO WISHES!
      FUNNY !!!
      WEAKLY BELIEVE IN YOUR WORDS A PROFESSOR!
      IDF RUNS OUT HOW ONLY UNDERSTAND THAT RESISTANCE IS USEFUL!
      1. +1
        17 January 2012 22: 24
        pseudo Odessa, before writing in capital letters, you must learn to write correctly: "BELIEVE" must be written without a soft sign.
        1. Odesit
          -6
          17 January 2012 23: 00
          Quote Professor - "pseudo Odessa".
          Why pseudo?
          Or do you think that everyone in Odessa loves Jews ?!
          I will not repeat myself about the peculiarities of spelling the name of OUR city, we often speak and write with one "C".
          Tired of "scholars" like you. It's time for you to know already - the blood obliges you like!
          1. -1
            17 January 2012 23: 12
            Pseudo because not a single citizen of Odessa will write Odessa with one "s" for any money! So, my friend, anyone, but not Odessa.

            I will not repeat myself about the peculiarities of spelling the name of OUR city, we often speak and write with one "C".

            I wonder how you can talk Odessa with one or two "s"? And again, in the great mighty Russian language, the word "spoken" must be written without a soft sign. As a Russian, you are ashamed not to know this.
            Slavic blood flows in my veins and this does not apply to spelling.
            1. Odesit
              -3
              17 January 2012 23: 26
              Well, if you are Russian ?! Sorry!
              If you do not know and have not seen or heard, why are you saying ?!
              We generally pronounce Adesa!
              Do not say what you do not know!
              1. -1
                17 January 2012 23: 30
                I'm not sorry. angry
                My nationality and place of residence do not justify your ignorance. On this I stop communicating with you on non-technical topics.
                1. Odesit
                  -1
                  18 January 2012 00: 27
                  This shows your ignorance and complete lack of knowledge of the city you dare to talk about!
                  You didn’t even bother to get familiar with how they talk in our city. Although the sources are MILLION!
                  Do not dishonor yourself "Associate Professor"!
                  1. +1
                    18 January 2012 10: 03
                    Million is spelled with two "l". wink
      2. Insurgent
        -2
        17 January 2012 23: 37
        Odessa you also had a Jewish city, you are not a Jew by chance, the biggest anti-sims are the Jews themselves
        1. Odesit
          -7
          18 January 2012 00: 15
          GOD KEEP THE KING! And Us from the Jewish infection!
          1. SAMEDOV SULEYMAN
            -4
            18 January 2012 00: 35
            Alexander do not mess, prove to them something is useless! Regards!
            1. Odesit
              -1
              18 January 2012 01: 04
              Good evening Suleiman!
              I am glad to welcome you!
              Long time no talk with you!
              You are right.
              Shaitan is with them. Let them boil in their own juice. I'm tired of it.
              With respect.
              1. SAMEDOV SULEYMAN
                0
                18 January 2012 01: 10
                I was always amazed at your patience, the controversy on the site is sometimes not only uninteresting and useless, but also a pronounced national subtext, it’s a shame, the site, in principle, is not bad a lot of interesting information.
                1. Odesit
                  0
                  18 January 2012 01: 24
                  I agree with YOU. And what to do, the site is created for ALL sane. We must somehow get rid of the ballast !. OUR BUSINESS RIGHT WE WILL WIN!
                  WITH RESPECT,
  13. Argentum
    -4
    17 January 2012 19: 03
    Jews brazenly occupied the lands of Lebanon, Palestine and Egypt. But what the UN does not grumble, since the owners of the UN are Jews.
  14. alatau_09
    -2
    17 January 2012 19: 07
    An article with subtext, and in the light of recent events in the region, a tricky ...
    The justification of the West in support of the Jewish state is clearly visible ...
    Historical information is mostly "sucked from the finger" ...
    The creation by the West of the state of Jews in Palestine and the state of Albanians in Kosovo completely coincides to the smallest detail, where the indigenous peoples lose their historical territories artificially (where purposeful emigration, and where demographic ...)

    It was precisely the Zionist Jews of Palestine who invented total terror, like a bloody struggle, and this also must not be forgotten ...

    Further, a continuous policy ... and one of the subparagraphs of this policy - the actual Israel exists with Saudi money that is spinning in USA and part of it goes to Israel in the form of annual free financial assistance from amers ...

    I’m not going to discuss further, read the history of the region and preferably from various sources ...
  15. serge
    -8
    17 January 2012 19: 35
    What else is Israel? The USA is creating an Arab caliphate. If only Jews would not rush to Russia. They already have America. If they manage to take their feet away. Gaddafi, by the way, was kind of a Jew. So what, he survived?
  16. -3
    17 January 2012 20: 13
    I fully agree with alatau_09, the article is really one-sided and biased. For some reason, the author kept silent about the guarantees of independence that England gave the Palestinian Arabs in exchange for help in the fight against the Ottoman Empire (Jews were also promised help in creating a "Jewish national home" Ottoman Empire wink He also kept silent about the conflicts (and their reasons) of the first Jewish settlers with the Palestinian Arabs and the role of British troops in these conflicts, and without this, it is impossible to form a correct idea of ​​the reasons for the confrontation. By the way, a year ago, there was a fairly complete information on this theme, but it has now been "ulutshil" a little, now there is nothing unspeakable about the promises of the British and the "history" itself begins in 1917 and not from the end of the 19th century.
  17. Odesit
    -2
    17 January 2012 20: 58
    The danger of Zionism cannot be understated!
    Zionism and in particular the international Jewish financial circles - which, in principle, is one and the same! They were the driving force behind many coups d'etat and, in their destructive power, they probably caused no less grief than National Socialism!
    Both in one and in another idea - the chosen people of a certain nation are declared!
    Zionism combines both a semi-literate African Jew and a liberal Jewish intellectual in Moscow and a terry freemason from Bnai Brit in the USA. This is the danger!
    Not a secret. that in the highest Zionist circles the future policy of all Jewry is determined.
    The emblem of the International Jewish Union, for example, is a globe entwined with a snake (a cult symbol in Judaism) and two hands meeting against its background in a handshake, which symbolizes the unity of the Jews of the whole world!
    This is very dangerous for any state on the planet!
    Arabs are not our best comrades. but the choice between them and the Jews is better than the Arabs!
    If only because the Jews represent an internal, "creeping" danger, corrupting the state from within, unnoticed by an outside observer!
    And the Arab be on a horse or on a tank. - only an external enemy and no more!
    For captivity, you will think, FOR WHAT REASONS THE PEOPLES OF EUROPE AND ASIA (THE STATE OF ALL SPECIES AND MASTS) DURING THE MILLENNIUM, THERE HAVE BEEN STILY LOVED AND DO NOT LIKE THE JEWS TO THIS TIME !!!
    DOES THERE ARE A GENERAL REASON FOR THEM FOR THIS ?!
    (examples are well known).
    1. lightforcer
      -4
      17 January 2012 21: 04
      Odessa - means the freemason. And where else can one explain the knowledge of the secrets of Zionism?


      1. Odesit
        -3
        17 January 2012 21: 39
        Are you weird ?!
        In Odessa, what do you think, Russians do not live ?!
        Knowledge of the secrets of Zionism, as you put it, can be gleaned for example in the excellent book "THE CROWN OF RUSSIA", published with the blessing of the Moscow Patriarchate!
        read understand.
        And so it is not necessary to insult our glorious citizens of Odessa!
        1. 0
          17 January 2012 22: 09
          For the first time in my life I see Odessa who writes the word Odessa with one "c". request
          1. Odesit
            -3
            17 January 2012 23: 04
            Come and find out. As the name of our city is pronounced by our inhabitants!
            I understand that you might not be aware of this! Israel is far away!
            But in general it’s strange that so many Jews have left here who pronounce just like that - Odessa (with one C), but you don’t know! It’s strange.
            If the Russian people are already used to it!
            Okay - this is excusable to you!
            1. -1
              17 January 2012 23: 16
              I lived for about two years in the Village of Kotovsky, so I don’t tell such a troll as you tell me about Odessa.
              1. Odesit
                -3
                18 January 2012 00: 19
                In Kotovsk (city. District center of the region), or in the Odessa region - Kotovsky village - SUVOROVSKY DISTRICT specify.
                And so, you are not interesting to me either.
                End of communication.
                My Jewish opponent.
          2. serge
            -1
            17 January 2012 23: 11
            Professor
            I recommend that you also read the biographer of Napoleon Banaparte about their company in the Middle East, very informative.
            ----------------------------------------------
            not the topic, but I see a conversation about spelling

            Napoleon Bonaparte's biographer about their campaign
            Nick professor does not suit you. The error is a bit too much.
            1. -1
              17 January 2012 23: 13
              I'm ashamed, I’ll be corrected, techie I. request
              1. Odesit
                -3
                17 January 2012 23: 30
                No, you are not a "techie"!
                You are more like a trained specialist to promote brain liquefaction in an unprepared population!
                Fortunately, there are few of them!
                1. -1
                  17 January 2012 23: 38
                  Do not feed the trolls.
                2. SAMEDOV SULEYMAN
                  -3
                  18 January 2012 00: 39
                  Moreover, thoroughly trained technician for dusting the brains!
                  1. Odesit
                    -2
                    18 January 2012 01: 16
                    Or!
                    To dilute the brain and weaken the enemy, what can you do! For the prosperity of the "Chosen People of Israel"!
                    1. lightforcer
                      0
                      18 January 2012 18: 15
                      The "Chosen People" of course are Russians. God and Putin are with us.
  18. Igserafim
    +2
    18 January 2012 00: 57
    and I sincerely regret the majority of the Jewish people, which its owners will use in multinational offices and throw for eating. all people are not without sin, who is a saint - let him throw the first at the Jews (I'm not talking about bankers and all kinds of tripartite commissions). I will even feel sorry for the Hasidim if they are killed in a brewing dump. if not all this heinous fuss with world domination and world government, with all these initiated revolutions, civil wars and a global mess !!! Well, Jews would have lived in kibbutzim next to the Arabs. under somebody’s protectorate. Sorry for the Jews, they also have good people. Not lost for nothing
    1. Odesit
      -4
      18 January 2012 01: 35
      Better remember the thousands of Russian officers shot by Jewish commissars!
      AND THE YANKEL OF THE YUROVSKY COMMANDER, THE BARBARIAN DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY OF OUR STATE!
      WHAT HE WOULD NOT BE A PRINCIPAL BUT HE IS OUR PRINCIPAL.
      AND SO IT WOULD NOT BE GATHERED!
      IT IS NOT FORGIVING IT!
      1. Igserafim
        +1
        18 January 2012 12: 37
        and you can also remember the apostles of Christ - all, as if by selection, Jews according to the flesh. And everyone was killed, mainly by the brothers, or by their nauskivanie. "The family has its black sheep", by the way, is applicable to any nation. In order for the Yankels and Bronsteins to flourish, the Alekseevs, Milyukovs and Rodzians were needed, fooled not without their will and participation. It seems to me absolutely unacceptable for us to hang a shameful label on all the people. "With what measure you mete, it will be measured to you." Well, we have something, with four million annual abortions and millions of orphans, there will be something to weigh the measure down. And you won't be able to blame everything on Jews, Masons and the world government. That's what I'm talking about. We are weak as long as we live like pigs, without God and without conscience. And external enemies have always only strengthened our system and mobilized. Both Russia and the Russians became a great power, not least thanks to their generosity, generosity and condescension to the weak and others (I'm not talking about LGBT people and other immoralities, but about cultural, religious and linguistic differences)
      2. Insurgent
        0
        18 January 2012 20: 41
        The tsar himself is to blame for the revolution, he accelerated it with his own board. As for the Bolsheviks, that backward tsarist Russia would have dealt with Hitler, something I doubt
  19. 0
    18 January 2012 08: 10
    Douglas Reed's Book of Controversy over Zion. http://www.e-reading.org.ua/book.php?book=48270
  20. -1
    18 January 2012 08: 44
    Quote from Douglas Reed's book “The Debate on Zion” --------- For ten years after the Palestinian “mandate” was imposed on the English people, international propaganda supported the thesis that the so-called. The "Jewish national hearth" in Palestine will be, under the protection of England, just a "cultural center" of Judaism, not representing any threat to the Arabs: a kind of Jewish Mecca, with a university, library and agricultural settlements. (Note: Translations: In order to designate Palestine as the territory of the future concentration of Jews, the Balfour declaration used the undefinable term “national home”, meaning “national center”, “center of settlement”, “darling” land "and anything else, up to the" national state ", which, however, for obvious reasons was not specifically mentioned. In translations into other languages, this term has an equally vague and amenable to any interpretation meaning:" foyer national "(French .), “Heimstatte” (German), etc. In our translation we adopted the French term “national hearth”, because the English name of this chapter, “National Home”, is difficult to translate into Russian). This did not deceive the Arabs, who knew perfectly well that they became the object of an attempt to force to restore the “law” of robbery and landlessness established by the Levites in the 20th century B.C. in the 5th century according to R. Kh. They responded with incessant riots and uprisings, in As a result, the war, which was supposed to “end all wars,” laid the foundation for new wars, the end of which is still not visible.

    Immediately, it became clear that the Zionism imposed on the people acted in their midst as a charge of dynamite, and that “in a small country the size of Wales or Vermont” (just “freed” from the Turks) a time bomb was found to be planted, which inevitably should lead in the future to global conflicts. However, the new British Colonial Minister, Leopold Emery, arriving in Palestine in 1925, “bluntly told the Arabs that there was no way to change British politics” (Jewish Telegraph Agency from Emery himself). This statement (as well as Balfour’s previous statements that British policy has been finally resolved on this issue ”) hides the main secret of everything that happens and contains an undeniable challenge to humanity. When, even in history, a change in any policy was declared impossible in advance under any circumstances? The policy turned out to be impracticable and clearly catastrophic in this case. What power was able to dictate that this policy should be pursued at all costs and under all circumstances? None of the British or American politicians had ever explained to their voters, parliament or Congress the reasons for this secret surrender (we will see further that statements repeating the words of Balfour and Emery were repeatedly published in America in the 1950s).
  21. ab
    ab
    0
    18 January 2012 16: 40
    v obshem vse pravilno v statie .Tolko ne vse voini napisani. Esli posmotret moi kommenti> to4no 4to ja pisal. wink

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"