Reuters: NATO is concerned about sending "the entire Northern Fleet" of the Russian Navy to the shores of Syria

83
Information Agency Rider, referring to the representative of NATO, goes with the publication that Russia has sent the entire Northern Fleet to the shores of Syria. NATO said they were “concerned about Russia's naval operation, which is the largest since the end of the Cold War.”

Double standards and here "in all its glory." If the US Navy considered that the oceans are the property of the United States, then NATO officials are not concerned about this. But in the case of sending a naval naval group of the Russian Navy to the eastern Mediterranean, the NATO machine begins to emit shrill sounds through the mouth of its bureaucratic apparatus.



Reuters: NATO is concerned about sending "the entire Northern Fleet" of the Russian Navy to the shores of Syria


The interlocutor of the Western news agency stated that it is “extremely clear” for him that in the coming weeks Russia will increase the air group in Syria using the potentials of the Admiral Kuznetsov TARK and complete the operation in Aleppo. At the same time, the statement by a NATO official clearly gives some regret. And this once again underlines the clear interest of the United States and individual members of the North Atlantic military bloc in maintaining the strike fist in the form of terrorist groups that obey commands from Washington, Riyadh, Doha, Ankara.

Against this background, there are reports of a new assault on the positions of the Syrian army in Deir ez-Zor by ISIL militants (banned in the Russian Federation). Terrorists, as reported by the agency AMN, tried to storm the quarter in which the hospital is located. Having suffered serious losses, the Syrian army soldiers, who are actually in blockade, repulsed the offensive of the militants. It is reported that the IG left its militants in the quarter 20 destroyed by the fire of the SAR army.
  • Norwegian Navy Headquarters
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    20 October 2016 07: 00
    "the entire Northern Fleet."

    Sounds nice. winked
    1. +30
      20 October 2016 07: 10
      Could it be a joke, to call a combination of several ships "the entire Northern Fleet"? smile
      1. +18
        20 October 2016 07: 55
        Quote: Bayonet
        Could it be a joke, to call a combination of several ships "the entire Northern Fleet"?

        Or maybe they also guessed that if the SF went to sea, then most of it is not visible? And the one that is visible is a less dangerous part of the fleet?
        1. +18
          20 October 2016 08: 08
          Quote: Vladimirets
          "the entire Northern Fleet."

          Sounds nice. winked


          Fear has big eyes ... they began to realize that Russia would bring to its logical conclusion the operation in Syria.
          1. +13
            20 October 2016 09: 44
            in general, the idiocy of the situation infuriates himself. Some stupid source-interlocutor (and it is not clear who) blurted out another nonsense, everyone rushed to suck it. Have a nice day, everyone!
        2. +6
          20 October 2016 08: 28
          The usual incitement of hysteria for Americans. They themselves are constantly scampering along our borders and no one cares for some reason. All right, Russia would still be floating around the crazies, otherwise it's almost at home. Moreover, in agreement with the Syrian side. And the rest is not America's business. Russia does not need another Libya and Somalia at hand. Let at least the dictator Assad, but this is at least some kind of order than the Somali "democracy"
          1. +4
            20 October 2016 08: 34
            For some reason, they constantly rummage along our borders and for some reason this doesn’t concern anyone.

            Well, isn't that clear? They swim peacefully and democratically near our borders, but we aggressively left our naval bases and threaten all sorts of values.
            1. +8
              20 October 2016 09: 34
              Quote: umah

              Well, isn't that clear? They swim peacefully and democratically near our borders, but we aggressively left our naval bases and threaten all sorts of values.

              1. +4
                20 October 2016 09: 50
                And the fourth has already died chtoli? belay or is he niggas pressing in texas?
        3. +1
          20 October 2016 09: 01
          In general, this does not flatter them. Let them remain at their perplexity. And in general, our command should not report who, where and why did they go ... ... Putina began, they came out to catch fish ... laughing Will such an answer suit them? smile
      2. +1
        20 October 2016 08: 59
        Quote: Bayonet
        Could it be a joke, to call a combination of several ships "the entire Northern Fleet"?

        Of course Alexander is a joke! After all, how does it warm your soul! And then. that "the entire Northern Fleet" is much more powerful than "the entire fleet of the EuroSoyuz" - this is a bone in your throat for you personally!
      3. 0
        22 October 2016 15: 04
        When I read about the entire Northern Fleet a few days ago, I just thought that it was a prank, although it is true about the ships of the 1st rank, and it is really a shame for the power plants of "Kuznetsov", even in the First World War the ships did not smoke like that!
    2. +4
      20 October 2016 07: 30
      Quote: Vladimirets
      "the entire Northern Fleet."

      Sounds nice

      In fairness, we have not done anything like this for a long time, the group really inspires.
      1. +3
        20 October 2016 07: 41
        Well, maybe in the Russian Federation it became known about the next NATO plans, like 10 months ago with the air force bomber shot down by them?

        Even just one ship from the Federation Council can easily send all of the United States into oblivion, so this sub-not for smart people.
        1. +17
          20 October 2016 08: 19
          Quote: Simpsonian
          Even just one ship from the Federation Council can easily send the entire US into oblivion,

          It’s not even hatred, it’s .... I haven’t heard a cooler statement! How have they still not crawled away with cancer? fellow
          1. 0
            21 October 2016 07: 40
            Is that not true? As soon as 15 plusers with you 16th enraged ... winked

            For one ship, the captain of the second (or the captain of the first if his ship is at risk) can now throw boots on the control panel completely ....
      2. 0
        21 October 2016 14: 13
        Inspires laughter and only
    3. +1
      20 October 2016 07: 38
      You do not give the NATO members a break for changing diapers!
      Even kindergartners know that the strategic base of the SSBNs is based on strategic SSBNs, which are now located near the United States — you see how the NATO concern over the fate of the OWNER! am
      1. 0
        20 October 2016 07: 55
        maybe he walked into it, and still walks in those ... lol
      2. +6
        20 October 2016 08: 23
        Quote: hydrox
        strategic SSBNs, now located at positions near the United States

        Did you and Simpsonian develop such an operation? He generally threatens to erase America with just one ship! laughing
        1. +7
          20 October 2016 08: 49
          Bayonet, but not bzdi, no one is going to attack your American masters!
          1. +4
            20 October 2016 10: 29
            Bayonet, but not bzdi, no one is going to attack your American masters!

            You denounce on the Bayonet write to your employer that there are American spies around and spy on you through the window. And into the keyhole.
            1. 0
              21 October 2016 07: 42
              it's a blatant lie, he is Israeli ...
          2. 0
            20 October 2016 11: 08
            Quote: Alex_1973
            Bayonet, but not bzdi, no one is going to attack your American masters!

            "There is no Rio de Janeiro, and there is no America, and there is no Europe, there is nothing. And in general, the last city is Shepetovka, on which the waves of the Atlantic Ocean break." wassat
            You need to know the classics good
          3. +2
            20 October 2016 12: 02
            Quote: Alex_1973
            Bayonet, but not bzdi, no one is going to attack your American masters!

            But besides rudeness there is nothing to say? I would explain to you in a language accepted in your society who you are, but I respect the rules of the site. So guess yourself fool
            1. 0
              21 October 2016 07: 43
              mb no reason?

              rudeness is not visible, but the truth is visible, or its close likeness ...
    4. +7
      20 October 2016 07: 51
      NATO concerned about sending "the entire Northern Fleet" of the Russian Navy to the shores of Syria

      Damn, not only in NATO, but also in VO, some comrades are concerned about this. fellow
      1. +3
        20 October 2016 07: 53
        Quote: vovanpain
        Damn, not only in NATO, but also in VO, some comrades are concerned about this.

        ... and then Barak realized that he did not like to be president at all ...
        1. +7
          20 October 2016 08: 19
          Quote: insular
          . and then Barak realized that he did not like to be president at all ...

          And the Monkey is already left to steer a matter of days. wink hi
          1. 0
            20 October 2016 10: 20
            For months. Until the beginning of the 20th of January.
    5. 0
      20 October 2016 09: 31
      whole Northern Fleet

      laughing laughing
      1. 0
        20 October 2016 11: 13
        So the article on VO was:
        https://topwar.ru/62687-korabli-remonta-rezerva-i
        -konservacii-vmf-rf.html
  2. +3
    20 October 2016 07: 06
    "NATO is concerned about sending the entire Northern Fleet of the Russian Navy to the shores of Syria"
    Damn, and we are worried. But nothing, we’ll build new ships, we’ll create a permanent base in the Mediterranean, you look, everything will gradually work out - then the NATO will no longer need to worry about our Northern Fleet ...
    1. +4
      20 October 2016 08: 56
      Quote: Jovanni
      But nothing, we’ll build new ships, we’ll create a permanent base in the Mediterranean,

      Let's finish "Ivan Gren" and let's go to build a base!
      "The large landing ship" Ivan Gren ", the delivery date of which has been repeatedly shifted to the Russian Navy, will be returned to the plant for the next cutting of the hull due to a serious design flaw. The ship was let down by an electromagnetic field that did not correspond to the terms of reference. The Ministry of Defense also previously reported that “most of the design has undergone major changes.” In its reports, the press service of the department emphasized that the construction of the large landing craft “Ivan Gren” uses the most modern technologies to reduce visibility through the use of modern materials and technical solutions. DYantar PSZ Director General Eduard Efimov called the ship’s delivery date the third quarter of 2016.
  3. +3
    20 October 2016 07: 08
    Russia sent the entire Northern Fleet to the Syrian shores

    And in my opinion this is the entire American fleet sticking out in all the seas and oceans, even where it should not be by definition. America is not very comfortable when in addition to their ships at sea are ships of non-NATO countries. But they will have to endure, no matter how they grit their teeth.
  4. Cat
    +1
    20 October 2016 07: 10
    The official. Sorry further. Now you’ll work out the cut paper from Uncle Sam, and tomorrow, the bearded chicks you took under the wing will cut the Europeans, he thinks that just like that, three million ambreks were sent to him by smart, bloodthirsty uncles and aunts from the Zaokansky khanate, a funny eccentric, then he will howl , but it will only be too late, though .... this one will dump the family overseas when muslims crush France and start tearing Germany away. The Germans are beginning to suspect something and have increased the military budget to the third in the world after the United States of America and China, but the enemy is already inside, like a tumor is dispersing in the German veins of settlements, the bombing of its own territory is already a loss. The official is in the know, but hamsters should not suspect anything, otherwise an impending performance with a new world Arab evil may break.
  5. 0
    20 October 2016 07: 13
    in the coming weeks, Russia will increase its air group in Syria using the capabilities of Admiral Kuznetsov TARK and complete the operation in Aleppo.

    Well, nice, if so!
    At the same time, the statement of the NATO official clearly gives some regret.
  6. 0
    20 October 2016 07: 13
    Ghouls have already piled into the pants.
  7. 0
    20 October 2016 07: 16
    As if our ships were going to NATO ports with landing on board to clear Europe of the Talitarasts and terrorists hi Mongrels, what else to say about them!
  8. +1
    20 October 2016 07: 24
    Apparently NATO's head is blown away by the "Russian threat". An enemy looms around every corner. "You just need to surrender either to captivity or to a mental hospital.
  9. Cat
    +1
    20 October 2016 07: 26
    Relax, there will be no war between us, the Satanists have already played the Russian card twice, everything depends on the ultimate goal, and the goal is a new world government, how will it become world when the conflict affects only Christian countries, no, here you need to shake the whole continent, South America is not interested, they will swim limply in the wake of events, it is religious strife and oppression of both Christians and Muslims that will give both adversity more willingly so that they would more readily accept the new doctrine with a single center, only an interregional, interracial massacre, so do not expect America to rush a checker for you and me for the sake of some militias and moderate fighters with the regime, there was an attempt to politically and then economically subjugate the country's leadership so that it would act in the interests of the hegemon, but it didn’t work out, maybe this will become a key event that World Satanism has crossed out our country from the axis of influence; this will be a victory for future generations without a doubt.
  10. +3
    20 October 2016 07: 27
    Ah-ah-ah "the entire northern fleet" ... Schaz the Swedes will get excited and go back to the Kemsk parish to take laughing
    1. +3
      20 October 2016 08: 10
      Well, the Swedes are the enemy of the BF. They do not come into contact with SF.
  11. 0
    20 October 2016 07: 36
    the NATO machine begins to make piercing sounds through the lips of its bureaucratic apparatus.

    Signals emit ... smile they have a favorite game.
  12. +1
    20 October 2016 07: 38
    Indeed, all of the Northern Fleet's naval ships came out. And you do not worry about this, but simply state the fact.
    1. +6
      20 October 2016 08: 14
      Not really. The Northern Fleet is large, all sorts of RTOs, RCAs, Albatrossiki - they stayed at home.

      The entire living 1 rank has gone far. So it’s more correct. 2 BOD - under repair, Shepherd completely disassembled (the turbines are being repaired at the factory), the second is sluggish. Ushakov - he is a coastal state in terms of boilers. Ustinov under repair. Gorshkov in trials.

      Therefore, from the surface forces of Ushakov + MPK + RCA + MRK + undergoing Gorshkov’s tests. Yes, in the winter Ustinych can catch up.
      1. 0
        21 October 2016 14: 16
        We won’t pull up yet
  13. +3
    20 October 2016 07: 48
    "NATO is concerned about sending the entire Northern Fleet of the Russian Navy to the shores of Syria"

    So rejoice that not to the shores of the Baltic states, Finns, Norway ...! Especially for Syria, to relieve tension in Europe! Nearby you are ours.
  14. +1
    20 October 2016 07: 51
    [quoteReuters: NATO is concerned about sending "the entire Northern Fleet" of the Russian Navy to the shores of Syria] [/ quote] A cat smells whose meat has sat down.
  15. +1
    20 October 2016 07: 53
    Quote: neha
    Indeed, all of the Northern Fleet's naval ships came out. And you do not worry about this, but simply state the fact.


    The main thing is that it would not have been in vain. What would they complete the task and return, worthily carrying the flag of Russia across the seas and oceans.
  16. +1
    20 October 2016 07: 53
    Concern needs to be treated.
  17. +1
    20 October 2016 08: 22
    "Russia sent to the shores of Syria allegedly ALL Northern Fleet " Damn, how elegantly they cheated on us. am
  18. 0
    20 October 2016 08: 23
    Let them look at the Russian fleet, otherwise they have completely lost their fear, the faces of the dogs.
  19. 0
    20 October 2016 08: 25
    They certainly exaggerated. They cannot breathe without it. Indeed "Grasshopper" and the accompaniment looks solid and alas, unusual
  20. 0
    20 October 2016 08: 28
    Such worried, well, straight at least do not leave the house))))
    Umotali with their "plate".
    For all questions of disorder, please contact the "Without Borders" psychiatric hospice !!!
  21. +3
    20 October 2016 08: 29
    The main forces are under water.
  22. +3
    20 October 2016 08: 45
    And no one thinks that by writing "sending the entire Northern Fleet to the shores of Syria," NATO members do not express concern, but simply laugh at our sailors, that the entire Northern Fleet, in their opinion, is Peter and the under-carrier?
  23. 0
    20 October 2016 08: 46
    And why did you decide that competent officials in NATO? The NATO budget is ten times bigger than the Russian one, but what's the point. Only a day to the windows and the Koran. And at -15 they refuse to participate in exercises, their diapers freeze. Here in Lithuania, cooks for 100 euros are delivered to the army. The same officials.
  24. +3
    20 October 2016 08: 55
    Do not joke on the statements of NATO members. If, instead of rocket frigates, destroyers, or at least TFRs, the strike force includes 2 BODs, on which only one 100 mm gun is the strike weapon - the rest are anti-submarine weapons and an air defense system for self-defense - these foreigners are not so far from the truth. There are no other ships. request
  25. 0
    20 October 2016 09: 04
    Yes, they’re anxious reapers, we’ll ask them where our fleet will go, without how snotty
  26. 0
    20 October 2016 09: 06
    Fleet in the Mediterranean, aerospace forces in Syria and paratroopers, just in case, in Egypt. Everything is ready. "Partners" can begin actions against the Syrian army. NATO can begin to defend against the aggression of the "bloody dictator Assad", who decided to seize French Aleppo with the help of Russia. Hollande may begin to be the first to suppress Russia's "war crimes" in Sirnia.
  27. +1
    20 October 2016 09: 30
    I don’t know for what purpose this information was injected from the side of a certain person, but it doesn’t cause anything other than "twirl a finger at the temple". Even the most ignorant man in the street would not come up with the idea that Russia "exposed" its North and sent the ENTIRE northern fleet somewhere there ...
    1. 0
      20 October 2016 09: 57
      Quote: AlexTires
      I don’t know for what purpose this information was injected from the side of a certain person, but it doesn’t cause anything other than "twirl a finger at the temple". Even the most ignorant man in the street would not come up with the idea that Russia "exposed" its North and sent the ENTIRE northern fleet somewhere there ...

      Maybe the goal is to laugh - well, to show strength naturally to doubters, they will show 3-4 of our ships and the USAG order on a hike - where there are about 15 ships not counting an aircraft carrier - the difference is in person.
    2. 0
      21 October 2016 14: 18
      Yes, it’s true. ALL 1st rank surface fleet left
  28. +1
    20 October 2016 09: 30
    Quote: avg-mgn
    "NATO is concerned about sending the entire Northern Fleet of the Russian Navy to the shores of Syria"
    They ruined all their plans! The ships stood on the "banks", everything was under control and sight, and then they took and went to the World Ocean, a mess, damn it laughing Everything is gone, insidious Putin lol Tolley will still be, oh her wassat
  29. 0
    20 October 2016 09: 35
    Quote: Stinger
    Hollande may begin to be the first to suppress Russia's "war crimes" in Syria.

    Ours threw a show to the Belgian Air Force-they say bomb the civilian population! Those in shock, require an explanation from the ambassador lol And I would send them to Mogherini and to Hollande laughing
  30. 0
    20 October 2016 09: 59
    Russia sent the entire Northern Fleet to the Syrian shores
    Why cut it off? Part of the Baltic Fleet is also indicated in the original source laughing http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-
    syria-nato-idUSKCN12J2C6
  31. 0
    20 October 2016 10: 20
    The United States throws its ships anywhere in the world and attacks any NATO state and is silent about this and does not express any protests. Russia responded to threats from the United States and NATO, meaning immediately a tantrum about the mythical threat by Russia rose.
  32. 0
    20 October 2016 10: 43
    Sergej1972 Months. Until the beginning of the 20th of January.

    More precisely, until January 16th.
    The 17th inauguration of the new.
  33. 0
    20 October 2016 10: 44
    Why bother with a fleet off the coast of Syria ?? There are enough boats with "caliber" on the Caspian Sea.

    Terrorists, as reported by AMN, tried to storm the quarter in which the hospital is located.
    How will the fleet help here?

    The author did not dare to subscribe))) Class !!!
  34. 0
    20 October 2016 11: 30
    Che so small? The entire Russian fleet.
  35. +1
    20 October 2016 16: 27
    Quote: Bayonet
    Could it be a joke, to call a combination of several ships "the entire Northern Fleet"? smile

    So it seems to me ...
  36. 0
    20 October 2016 18: 34
    And he, this "northern fleet" - how big is he? Will it fit into the Dardanela?
  37. 0
    20 October 2016 18: 34
    in srato forever preoccupied
    1. 0
      20 October 2016 21: 06
      Quote: Anniversary
      in srato forever preoccupied

      Is this a new block or a country? belay
  38. 0
    20 October 2016 23: 40
    Well, the Americans can keep all their fleets in the Persian Gulf, but we can’t send one ph to Syria? ....
  39. 0
    21 October 2016 02: 56
    Russia from the Black Sea will get everything in the Mediterranean Sea. It's just that they are scaring everyone through the media. They destroy everyone - who does not agree with America, and Russia does not allow the striped to kill others. For them, terrorists are more important than the people in Syria. They do not like Russia - because it kills terrorists. How much money America spent to create these terrorists. If Russia breaks them-where to collect these thugs, they spent their years and money in vain.
  40. kig
    +1
    21 October 2016 11: 42
    I looked now that the Air Force writes on this topic. And I watched the video. How he smokes, however ... almost like an armadillo of the 1900s. Something is wrong with the power plant, there should not be so much smoke. A merchant ship would already be fined for air pollution.
    1. 0
      21 October 2016 18: 59
      Quote: kig
      How he smokes, however ... almost like an armadillo of the 1900s.

      Yeah! Not bad! smile
  41. +1
    21 October 2016 14: 11
    Yes, it is almost true almost the entire surface fleet of the 1st rank

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"