Kiriyenko - frame experienced. After Yeltsin was appointed prime minister in 1998, he actively pursued liberal economic reforms in the style of Gaidar and Chubais and promptly defaulted in the country as soon as possible. After that, together with Nemtsov and Khakamada, he headed the Duma liberals, stayed as the presidential plenipotentiary and spent a long time in Rosatom. And now this hardened liberal again received a position with real authority.
The liberals, about whom everyone, except readers of blogs, had almost forgotten, immediately felt the force and launched an offensive. The occasion was an ordinary street action: at the entrance to the Moscow Museum stories Gulag members of the Revolutionary Communist Youth Union hung Solzhenitsyn's effigy. On the chest Komsomol members hung a sign with the verses:
Traitor Solzhenitsyn hanged here,
Over the truth, who loved to mock,
Shamelessly, we lied about the Gulag.
He is his motherland - the first enemy!
Immediately about this, a hysteria in the media began - not otherwise, the Komsomol members encroached on the holy! "Echo", "Rain", "MK", "Komsomolskaya", "Pravda" (here's a paradox), even State Duma deputy Peter Tolstoy - everyone began to splash poison and shout that the country was heading for the GULAG.
The leader of “Vesti Nedeli”, Dmitry Kiselyov, apparently, following the go-ahead from the presidential administration, connected to the howling liberals and began to accuse Solzhenitsyn's effigy hanged in “maydanuty”. And it would be okay, young admirers of communist ideas began to carry the Trotsky heresy about the “world revolution” and sway the situation in the country. But they just called the traitor a traitor.
Judge for yourself: when Solzhenitsyn in 1975, called on Americans: "Please interfere more in our internal affairs ... We ask you to interfere!" - Is this not a speech "maydanuty"? As for the Soviet economy, Solzhenitsyn in his New York speech said something else: "Do not interfere with it. Stop giving her loans and selling ". What is it like not screaming "Let's get more sanctions!" are today's liberals wrapped in Ukrainian flags?
And when Alexander Isaevich praised the United States, inciting their leaders to behave with the USSR as hard as possible? "The course of history itself led you - made you world leaders"- he wrote. Is not the admiration of the agent of the State Department before overseas owners? However, the owners really generously paid him — enough for the estate in Vermont, and for expensive paid education for three sons, and for various funds to help like-minded people. Yes, and the US Senate Solzhenitsyn almost honorary citizen of the United States did not. True, he not only praised Americans, but also scolded them — because during the difficult years of World War II they helped our country fight Hitler.
Isn't the word "traitor" asking for the language itself when you learn about these facts?
And therefore it is not surprising that Alexander Isayevich justifies Vlasov and the Vlasovites in the GULAG Archipelago. His widow even had to cut out these passages from the Archipelago for schoolchildren. As she explained "because our society is not ready to discuss it today". Well, if children were taught in such books, but led to the Yeltsin Center, then, to the joy of the liberals, society will soon be ready to justify complicity with Hitler.
Even Yeltsin - this obvious traitor who collapsed the country, refused to give up the Kuriles to Japan, as Solzhenitsyn had offered him.
But the Kuriles are a trifle for a traitor on such a scale as our Nobel Prize winner. Much more importantly, Alexander Isayevich urged the leadership of the USSR to abandon economic development altogether, from industry, large cities, space exploration, airplanes, roads and vehicles, to return to horses and manure, moving to the north-east, to Siberia.
"ECONOMIC GROWTH IS NOT ONLY NECESSARY, BUT IS GOITAL", - wrote Solzhenitsyn right like that, caps, like today's youngsters. It’s just a dream of any geopolitical opponents of Russia: so that the Russians “voluntarily and with songs” liquidate their industry and military might, move somewhere to Yakutia and survive there somehow, throwing open the permafrost on horseback. The “world community” would be very pleased with this solution of the “Russian question”.
But here's what is interesting: the children of the "great writer" for some reason do not master the remote Siberian lands. One is a pianist and conductor, professor at the Philadelphia Conservatory. The other two are senior executives at the elite consulting corporation McKinsey & Company. This is the kind of "conscience of the nation" that the liberals impose on us: to sell the country, to attach the kids over the hill.
But it was not limited to screams in the media. As expected, the liberals took the example of the informant Vetrova - that was the operational pseudonym of Solzhenitsyn, who denounced other prisoners. These irreconcilable fighters with the "bloody gebnei" immediately rushed to "knock" on the "bloody gebna" against the performers of a harmless "performance" with a stuffed animal.
“Hanging a stuffed effigy of a famous writer who has forever entered the history of Russia is very similar to extremism.”- requires repression Minkin. Requires as much from the president, and certainly prisons: "They are stopped only by prison, only the fear of punishment. ". A whole deputy mayor of Moscow, Leonid Pechatnikov personally wrote a statement to the prosecutor’s office, the prosecutor’s office took the visor under and began checking on “counteracting extremist activity”.
That is, they are trying to convince us that calling Solzhenitsyn and his followers traitors is extremism. Apparently, "incitement to hatred of the social group of traitors to the Motherland," yeah. We decided to explain that extremists are people who categorically disagree with the fact that the work of traitors is imposed on us in the media, and on our children in school. Everything leads to the fact that the liberal who separates Solzhenitsyn's petty ideas is a normal citizen, and the one who condemns the liberal is an extremist and a scoundrel whom only the prison will stop.
The national revival of Russia and the popular uprising want to stop, declaring black white and white white. And the fact that the liberals for this campaign decided that the state media and the prosecutor’s office were involved showed that they had influential patrons in the Kremlin.
And after all, not only with Solzhenitsyn has spun in lately. The whole patriotic public was shocked by the murder of Motorola, the hero of Novorossia. Whether it was not by the go-ahead, did they give a tip from the presidential administration (or even a direct instruction) to remove it? After all, even the Ukrainians were afraid to take responsibility for themselves, for them it was a surprise.
Did the Ministry of Finance accidentally report that they are discussing the abolition of seniority pensions for the siloviki? What is this, if not an attempt to undermine the loyalty of one of the most patriotic and influential forces in society?
There are a lot of such "bells" - it has been a heap of pain recently.
So Chubais, that red-haired ghost of dashing 90's, got out to praise the Central Bank, which brought down the ruble and raised interest rates on loans. At the same time, he seems to have told his supporters about the planned dates for the seizure of power:
"The central bank used the difficult economic situation very subtly and correctly ... The case for the second part is institutional reform. It is absolutely necessary. But I don’t even know from the world experience of countries that would start reforms in 1,5 year before the presidential election. Serious reforms always risky, always bringing with them the inevitable negative. In this sense, the main fork is the 2018 year. There is a decision point. "
Apparently, the arrival of Kiriyenko in the presidential administration gives them chances for a rematch, because the powers of the curator of domestic policy include the preparation and holding of presidential elections. They have a cautious plan: to do everything to discredit Putin and his team today, and in 2018 to push through his man for the presidency as a "successor." Those who disagree will be crushed as "extremists." While everyone thought that the liberals would try to seize power through the next "swamp" protests after the elections, they were weaving palace intrigues, creeping into increasingly high posts.
Back in February, the 15th congress of United Russia was held, which experts described as a “liberal turn” of the party. A third of the leaders of the party changed on it - as usual, the dissenters were removed. In April, one of the leading liberal figures, Alexei Kudrin, was appointed chairman of the Center for Strategic Research (CSR) board and charged with developing a development strategy for Russia from 2018 to 2030. That is, the plans they prepare, prepare thoroughly. And with the appointment of Kiriyenko, these plans got a chance for implementation. "I wish Sergey Kiriyenko success in the new post", - Kudrin wrote in Twitter.
No wonder Igor Strelkov warned that Shuvalov, a staunch liberal close to Kudrin and Chubais, could become Putin’s successor. Then he concluded:
“In the event that such a program is really being prepared now, all patriotic forces capable of resisting it will be gradually neutralized.”
A hardened, but inevitably aging, Putin, apparently, cannot fully oppose the liberals. The latter have zero prestige among the people, but they have extensive contacts, support for oligarchs, and help from abroad. In this situation, wide public condemnation is needed of both the political campaign to justify the betrayal and the course of liberal economic reforms carried out by the government. We will not do this - and the patriots in the Kremlin, not having broad popular support, will be defeated. This is our country, and we must protect it here and now, before it is too late.