Military Review
Sign In Register

Times: British banking group RBS refused to freeze Russia Today accounts

73
Banking group The Royal Bank of Scotland, the structural part of which is the notorious British bank NatWest, which became the day before, today announced that it was rejecting the decision to close the accounts of the Russian television station Russia Today. Recall that on the eve of the chief editor of RT Margarita Simonyan published information that testified to the freezing of the accounts of the British branch of Russia Today. The accounts are intended to freeze the above mentioned NatWest bank, which is part of the RBS group, 51% of which is owned by the state.


Times: British banking group RBS refused to freeze Russia Today accounts


Today is a British newspaper The Times publishes material stating that the RBS will not freeze the accounts of the Russian television company. One might think that the banking group suddenly remembered the freedom of speech, on guard of which, as London claims, is Britain. However, everything turned out to be more prosaic. It turned out that Russia was ready to carry out a retaliatory measure - to close all accounts of the “Russian Service Bi-Bi-C” and sue.

From the material (translation TASS):
RBS canceled its punitive measure after Moscow announced that it would freeze the BBC accounts and file a complaint against the UK with international supervisory authorities for violating freedom of speech obligations.


In the British media, it was called the victory of Russia and the defeat of the Foreign Ministry of the United Kingdom. Confirmation of information published in the Times, from the editor-in-chief RT has not yet been published.
Photos used:
finanse-info.ru
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
73 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Trevis
    Trevis 18 October 2016 14: 01
    +13
    In the British media it was called the victory of Russia and the defeat of the Foreign Ministry of the United Kingdom.

    You will still be! Cousin's mom! lol
    1. The black
      The black 18 October 2016 14: 02
      +5
      All backed up? They were afraid that others would flee from them.
      Or business or politics.
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 18 October 2016 14: 10
        +8
        Quote: Black
        All backed up?

        It was as if some major had decided to pounce in front of his madame and ran into a thin guy, but in the end he pulled out a lyuley. smile
        1. The black
          The black 18 October 2016 14: 11
          +20
          Anyway, these Scots are strange, everything is like in a pharmacy - bills, banks ... They would set fire to the studio in Ukraine and that's all. Teach these Britons democracy. Waltzman would be at least asked ... laughing
        2. iConst
          iConst 18 October 2016 14: 22
          +8
          Quote: Vladimirets
          It’s as if some major decided to pounce in front of his madame

          Everything is more prosaic - there is a tantrum. SGA put pressure on everyone. Many, including and not very smart politicians, trying to get a profit.
          Hence the ill-conceived statements, decisions and actions.

          In fact, such a countermeasure lay on the surface. It is known that the West is very sensitive to the loss of propaganda influence. This is the same groin that is painful even for not pressing hard, not to mention getting up from your feet ....
        3. Inok10
          Inok10 18 October 2016 15: 35
          +5
          Quote: Vladimirets
          It was as if some major had decided to pounce in front of his madame and ran into a thin guy, but in the end he pulled out a lyuley.

          ... so it happened ... lol
          In the British media it was called the victory of Russia and the defeat of the Foreign Ministry of the United Kingdom.
          ... in general it was, the names changed:
          One guy, let's call him Andrey, decided to scare his neighbor, let's call him Roma, just like that, for prevention.
          To be afraid.
          To do this, he unscrewed the light bulbs on three floors and lurked in the entrance at the moment when Roma was supposed to return home.
          At the right time, Andrei jumped out of the darkness and, appearing in front of Roma, as if by magic, depicted the evil Babai, screaming, growling and waving his hands.
          Roma, of course purely from fright, hit the “adversary” in the face. Once.
          He knocked out several teeth and broke his nose.
          Since then, Andrei has understood that it is more dangerous to scare for prevention than to be afraid.
          ... bully
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 18 October 2016 15: 43
            +5
            Quote: Inok10
            Since then, Andrei realized that scaring for prevention is more dangerous than being afraid

            - um ... and even better to be able (at least soberly) not to miss nose blows. And be able to set the nose, usually they don’t break it in the trash
            - front teeth are consumables, yes laughing
            - I welcome ... how do you like the updated site? I somehow ... not really what
            1. Inok10
              Inok10 18 October 2016 15: 56
              +6
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              - um ... and even better to be able (at least soberly) not to miss nose blows. And be able to set the nose, usually they don’t break it in the trash
              - front teeth are consumables, yes

              ... how did Borah Johnson know that he would immediately "fly in", you can understand him, change the chair of the mayor of London for the chair of the foreign minister a high jump, only he forgot that he will have to fall from a high too, well, not what, I hope a lesson will do him good ... the English gentleman was counting on being frightened ... and, with him, it's not like a gentleman ... wink
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              - I welcome ... how do you like the updated site? I somehow ... not really

              ... I welcome Roman Batkovich ... your namesake on behalf of the administration promised for these discussions off-topic - ban ... and it seems like the changes on the resource are not finished ... we will see the final version presented by the administration ... it’s hard to reason about the taste of Napoleon only by cake ... hi
              1. Vladimirets
                Vladimirets 18 October 2016 16: 58
                +6
                Quote: Inok10
                it’s difficult to talk about Napoleon’s taste only by cake

                Sorry, comrades, that I get in, but answering with the same high calm, I dare say that from the heartburn cakes already tired of drinking. hi
                1. Thor
                  Thor 18 October 2016 17: 19
                  +2
                  Heartburn is eliminated by cons, and they were removed am
                  1. Inok10
                    Inok10 18 October 2016 18: 09
                    +4
                    Quote: Thor
                    Sorry, comrades, that I get in, but answering with the same high calm, I dare say that from the heartburn cakes already tired of drinking.

                    ... Greetings Zhen Batkovich hi ... there is such a word ... but what can you do ... opinion-lie-slander is alas now one concept in the comments and not uncommon for certain individuals, an increase in the quantitative expression of fact ... let's hope we are offered effective means of dealing with by this on the resource or the administration itself will assume an exclusive function ...
                    Quote: Thor
                    Heartburn is eliminated by cons, and they were removed

                    ... I do not agree ... the stick is always two-edged ... hi
                    1. Vladimirets
                      Vladimirets 18 October 2016 18: 39
                      +1
                      Quote: Inok10
                      opinion-false-slander is now unfortunately one concept in the comments and not uncommon for certain individuals, an increase in the quantitative expression of fact ... let's hope we are offered effective means of dealing with this on the resource or the administration itself will assume an exclusive function ..

                      Hello, Alexy, son of Russians. hi Yes, I’m not even talking about the cons, if they are amiss, the site design freaks me out, they’ll remember me by night.
                      Quote: Inok10
                      the stick is always double-edged

                      Duc and sticks of three ends are. wink
                      1. Inok10
                        Inok10 18 October 2016 19: 38
                        +3
                        Quote: Vladimirets
                        Duc and sticks of three ends are.

                        ... good good ... the most sane rules in my opinion at the Air Base, abbreviated:
                        1. There is no and never will be any democracy on the forums
                        2. If you do not agree - see paragraph 1.
                        2.1. Moderators and administrators have the right to interpret controversial and clearly not agreed upon points of the Rules at their discretion.
                        2.2. If you still do not agree with the above, please refrain from communicating on the forum and site.
                        4. When discussing any topics, it is prohibited to violate the legislation of the Russian Federation. For violation of this clause (calls for extremism, disclosure of state secrets, discussion of the production of drugs and explosives, child pornography and the like), the message can be deleted, and all information about the participant can be provided to law enforcement agencies.
                        4.1. It is forbidden to disclose any private information about participants (“deanonymization”) in case of their disagreement with this.
                        5.2. A clear demonstration of ignorance of the rules of the Air Base at the discretion of the administration may be penalized.
                        5.3. Profanity and insulting treatment to the administration can be immediately punished with an unlimited ban.
                        6. At the Airbase forums, I try to maintain the spirit of a kind of club. The closest analogue is FIDOShnye echoconferences. And, traditionally, such clubs are not accepted to communicate "on you". This emphasizes the distance from the interlocutor, which is alien to the spirit of our communication. As they used to joke in Fido, "here" you "come to you in those cases when in real communication they would have already hit the face."
                        6.1. Therefore, you should not really rest on all sorts of "You do not poke me." If you don't like our monastery - you can look for another
                        8. Moderators who receive them are prohibited from discussing anywhere. Administration (moderators, coordinators) are not required to respond to privates regarding moderators. Discussing the moderator guilty is another fine.
                        8.1. It is permitted to raise the topic of unfair moderators by outsiders who have not received them. Permitted only in the forum Airbase. For discussing the moderatorial in the topic where he was issued - a fine to anyone.
                        9. It is forbidden to use the names of historical figures, odious and provocative nicknames, etc. as nicknames. It is forbidden to have more than one nickname.
                        10. There are no objective criteria for observing one or another rule, and never will be. Everything is decided by the subjective opinion of the administration of the forums.
                        11. For annoying behavior (attempts to offend an opponent, idle chatter, categorical statements not supported by facts, etc.), a fine may be punished.
                        11.0.1. Forum old-timers have some head start, they are forgiven more. If you come to someone else’s monastery, be kind and familiarize yourself with its charter before you tear your throat.
                        11.1. Prohibited under penalty of penalty "tupism" ("trollism") - "demonstrative misunderstanding" of the interlocutor's argumentation and explicit attempts to divert the conversation from the topic instead of providing the required arguments after loud, unsupported statements.
                        11.2. Justification for violations of clauses 11. and 11.1. references to offensive or openly "yellow" information sources are not.
                        11.3. The use of any statements that can offend another person, not only a forum member, submitted as a fact, requires mandatory documentary confirmation, for example, in the form of a link to the original source, etc. Otherwise, the participant who made an offensive categorical statement receives a fine. Expressing personal opinions in the form of "I think", "I think", etc. is not forbidden, if it does not violate other rules of the forum.
                        11.4. Despite the fact that we do not have democracy in the forums, communication is highly democratic (in the socionic sense). For arrogance, especially associated with neglect of the interlocutor, punishment is possible.
                        11.5. Any direct insults to any forum participant, a person outside of it, a country, nationality, political or religious movement, etc. etc. marked with a fine. Possible relief from clause 11.0.1.
                        14. The use of completely illiterate speech, "kashenism," all kinds of "gee, son, lol," etc. bullying the Russian language is punishable by a fine. To simple spelling, punctuation, etc. mistakes - no special complaints
                        18. Political offtopic outside of political forums is punished especially.
                        ... ah, the design ... the taste and color markers are different ... have already adapted ...
                    2. Thor
                      Thor 18 October 2016 22: 02
                      +1
                      Inok10
                      ... I do not agree ... the stick is always two-edged ...

                      I will clarify - at a stick more than one end wink
                      And the question is to hold on to the right and beat the right one.
                      Minus IMHO this reflects a disagreement with the content or form of the thesis of the opponent or author and should be, like a plus.
                      And the fact that different unbalanced personalities are minded indiscriminately or in terms of harm, so let them, an unhealthy minority, should not affect a healthy majority. Better Havnominuser than Gavnomokamer laughing
                  2. TiRex
                    TiRex 18 October 2016 21: 51
                    +3
                    nothing was removed, with minuses it was more logical, it was possible that you think it’s nonsense just to clear off, and not to unsubscribe for every occasion ...
            2. tommy717
              tommy717 19 October 2016 06: 19
              0
              About the new site. I don’t know who came up with the idea to update it, but it turned out straight after Chernomyrdinsky. Therefore, as Professor Preobrazhensky said: "Into the furnace!" It's time to go back to the old version.
        4. Anton Boldakov
          Anton Boldakov 18 October 2016 21: 23
          0
          Do not go. They ran. I just read that it turns out all this is a mistake. The decision letter was intended not to Russia Today, but to another person and was sent to the wrong address.
      2. hrych
        hrych 18 October 2016 14: 17
        +12
        Quote: Black
        They were afraid that others would flee from them.

        Royal Bank of Scotland CJSC was registered in Moscow at the end of 1993.
        In the ranking of Russian banks for 2015, the Royal Bank of Scotland, with net assets of 22,7 billion rubles, took 168th place, in terms of equity - 116th place (4,5 billion rubles), in profit - 30- e place (2,3 billion rubles).
        Offices and branches are located in Moscow, St. Petersburg and in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk.
        In short, Rashi Tudey’s accounts are probably not worth it to get in the ass from Russia with love laughing Moreover, on the konuna, the British government dissociated itself, saying that the bank itself came up with laughing
        1. just exp
          just exp 18 October 2016 14: 44
          +4
          koment interesting, but there is a question - what is konuna? on which was the British government when dissociated from yesterday?
          1. Vladimirets
            Vladimirets 18 October 2016 14: 48
            +3
            Quote: just explo
            there is a question - what is konuna? on which was the British government when dissociated from yesterday?

            laughing good Another word filter does not skip.
          2. hrych
            hrych 18 October 2016 15: 07
            +4
            Quote: just explo
            konuna

            Conan the barbarian, of course, and to you on the dull website of teachers of the Russian language laughing
          3. Corsair
            Corsair 18 October 2016 16: 14
            +1
            belay may mean on the eve like yesterday-se ..
            Young people now write, and not in Albanian and not in Russian, some kind of their own language.
            1. peta locksmith
              peta locksmith 18 October 2016 16: 44
              +1
              but what a scope for interpretation of a seemingly ordinary dialect, which, depending on the context, may be and an excuse ....
      3. Asadullah
        Asadullah 18 October 2016 14: 53
        +4
        Or business or politics.


        The fact of the matter is that the main pillar of capitalism is business. Politics follows from business. What happened? Even in the very heart of capitalism, England? By the way, despite the fact that the subsidiary bank of this group is English, but the Scottish banks enjoyed a reputation of reliable and independent, and this decision will even affect the reputation of the banks of Scotland as a whole without continuation. As for the ATI, they were ready for a possible option and prepared in advance, this will not affect the company's activities.

        There is another aspect of this use case - indication. Which shows that global business, more specifically Western business, is leaving the field of law in the twilight valley of rules. And this is serious.
        1. iConst
          iConst 18 October 2016 15: 00
          +3
          Quote: Asadullah
          The fact of the matter is that the main pillar of capitalism is business. Politics follows from business.

          Error: Capitalism is dead. More precisely, this stage has been "successfully" passed. We now have imperialism. And business has nothing to do with it.
          1. Asadullah
            Asadullah 18 October 2016 15: 46
            +2
            Error: Capitalism is dead. More precisely, this stage has been "successfully" passed. We now have imperialism. And business has nothing to do with it.


            I will not take the liberty to approve. In general, capitalism is the explosive development of industry, crafts, services and more. In communist China, he is quite alive and characteristic. smile Something similar in Singapore and Vietnam. It’s hard, with creak and sighs, rustling rattle stirs in Russia. For imperialism, it requires an explanation of what kind of modern empires are. First of all, apparently media empires, setting the pace, rhythm and tone of everything else, able to give birth and destroy anything. Secondly, banking clusters, O Almighty !, which today do not finance profitable prospects, but hold back some regions and overheat others, under the dictation of media empires. From the industry there remains only the priority of information technology. Imagine if, in the Middle Ages, all the ironmongers spent 95% of their time on the production of wooden bills. Remember those?

            In my most insignificant view, this can be called a stretch of imperialism, only looking back at the global aspect of the problem. I would call it a malignant fungus of business activity of mankind. Either we will be cured by weakening and destroying the Western mycelium of an ailment, or the world will be sick with fever, every year exacerbating the abulia of citizens to business activity.
      4. ziqzaq
        ziqzaq 18 October 2016 15: 48
        0
        Quote: Black
        All backed up? They were afraid that others would flee from them.
        Or business or politics.

        Something was shredded today by the bourgeois ...
      5. Iline
        Iline 18 October 2016 17: 21
        +1
        Liquid for violence turned out to be.
        They need to voice a Russian-Ukrainian anecdote with the ending "what about us?"
        However, knowing the British, they may not understand. English humor, you know, is understandable only to the British. Everything else they take seriously.
    2. elmi
      elmi 18 October 2016 14: 04
      +2
      And so it is necessary to act, mirror! What to do if they do not understand otherwise
      1. Dryuya2
        Dryuya2 18 October 2016 14: 08
        0
        offense for offtop
        maybe someone is interested
        live :
        Putin takes part in the congress of "Business Russia"
    3. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 18 October 2016 14: 04
      +1
      Times: British banking group RBS refused to freeze Russia Today accounts

      Who did you want to scare by frost, Russia? We are not afraid of frost, but here are some kind of frost. smile
  2. hirurg
    hirurg 18 October 2016 14: 03
    0
    No longer know how to pervert. True eyes prick and not only eyes.
    1. Kasym
      Kasym 18 October 2016 20: 31
      +1
      Yes, stupid Western politicians go, not a couple of Golu, Thatcher, etc. - they wanted to cut RT, but they got a PR of an English scale - the British will start looking out of curiosity (why is it that politicians are alarmed; BA !!! - they show Putin differently, but Moscow is not a monster) ... after plutonium and airless space in Syria, the Kremlin is not going to "swallow" this - well, what kind of tuuu.pits you have to be so as not to calculate it, especially in the presence of the British media in Moscow !!! Shredded - the affairs of the White House, planted puppets, from the stupidity of which Europeans are already ashamed and sick.
      One American journalist said that some congressman really believes that the islands ... are floating in the ocean. while others really believe that it is possible for Russians to rocket in Syria and they will not be anything for it. belay ... It's sad ... with such you can definitely go to extremes. Oh, there are few sane in politics - maybe the Kremlin can stir up some special operation, like "heir". bully We got stupidity and stupidity already. I am glad that Moscow began to respond toughly. hi
  3. Major Yurik
    Major Yurik 18 October 2016 14: 05
    +2
    Yes, one of those cases when a simple move according to the principle "doo.rac" worked like a clock. But this is the only way with this snake, nasty - through the court your money is minus! negative
  4. avvg
    avvg 18 October 2016 14: 06
    0
    In my opinion, RBS Banking Group operate on the principle, "nothing more - just business."
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 18 October 2016 14: 20
      +7
      What business? Do you really think that businessmen themselves could get to block RT accounts. This is a purely political order
  5. Wedmak
    Wedmak 18 October 2016 14: 06
    0
    Well, that's all. And you and I argued yesterday ... Reactively, the matter was resolved. good
  6. lysyj bob
    lysyj bob 18 October 2016 14: 07
    +1
    And then they got stuck ... It remains only to introduce new sanctions. No longer capable of anything.
  7. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 18 October 2016 14: 12
    0
    The bibles were scared. laughing
  8. Orionvit
    Orionvit 18 October 2016 14: 13
    +6
    What can I say, two-faced creatures. Like in that joke. And let's freeze Russia’s accounts / And if it is to us? And for what?
  9. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 18 October 2016 14: 15
    +5
    Confirmation of information published in the Times, from the chief editor of RT has not yet been published.

    Yeah, better wait RT. And then I immediately remember the classic:
    Mrs. Hudson: Thank God, the case is led by Inspector Lestrade. Newspapers write - the best inspector.
    Dr. Watson: Inspector Lestrade is a smug ass, Mrs. Hudson.
    Mrs. Hudson: So the Times writes ...
    ©
  10. Tusv
    Tusv 18 October 2016 14: 21
    0
    Well, as Napoleon said: "Freedom is a saber." We have a saber, which means there is a free word, in the form of a hilt on the head or a flat part of the blade on the back, and on the cutting part, as they say in Ukraine: "There are no bad ones."
  11. Victor-M
    Victor-M 18 October 2016 14: 25
    +2
    If you estimate the financing of the Western press and the Russian, as well as the number of working media on both sides, then the advantage is not in Russian favor, and losing your accounts, which are many times more than the accounts of your opponent, is somehow not in Anglo-Saxon. wink laughing
  12. kot28.ru
    kot28.ru 18 October 2016 14: 26
    +1
    Local liberals are already worn out on kakahu- "you kaptsa jackets, they isolate everything am ".Well, what about them from their hostesses! lol
  13. Pirate
    Pirate 18 October 2016 14: 29
    +2
    We must continue to wean from impunity. Shit - get the answer. But for greater effect, the answer should be a little more effective.
  14. win
    win 18 October 2016 14: 38
    +4
    What is the difference between CNN and Russia Today?
    As soon as the events begin, the CNN crew immediately arrives.
    As soon as the Russia Today film crew arrives, they immediately begin events
    1. NordUral
      NordUral 18 October 2016 14: 43
      +2
      Can you cite the facts? And what about information about the Shopping Center in the States before the events themselves?
    2. Tusv
      Tusv 18 October 2016 14: 48
      +1
      Quote: Siegen
      What is the difference between CNN and Russia Today?

      Good joke. But now I see that CNN arrives when the events are completed, but we need to give an assessment. No humor, sensation only
    3. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 18 October 2016 15: 53
      +3
      Quote: Siegen
      As soon as the events begin, the CNN crew immediately arrives.
      As soon as the Russia Today film crew arrives, the events begin immediately

      You tell this to Baghdad and Belgrade - about CNN arriving after the start of events... It was CNN who were the authors of the concept "live war"- and their correspondents were always where it was necessary, and when it was necessary (or even earlier). The whole world watched the attack on Baghdad.
      The day before the bombing of Iraq by allied aircraft, almost all journalists left the country urgently. In working condition, only the CNN crew remained in Baghdad, which worked live on the first 19 hours of the war.
      1. Corsair
        Corsair 18 October 2016 16: 21
        +1
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Tell this to the people of Baghdad and Belgrade - about CNN arriving after the events began. It was CNN who were the authors of the concept of "war on air" -

        what Duc they can work as spotters of fire and intelligence along the way, like these OSCE officers in the Donbas, or their people in the Moscow Region - such as shelling will be there and there at so much.
  15. NordUral
    NordUral 18 October 2016 14: 41
    +1
    Briefly and clearly. To strike - only by knockout in response!
  16. Altona
    Altona 18 October 2016 14: 47
    +2
    Who else is listening to By-By-Sy? Especially after the delirium about a "nuclear attack on Britain." Seva Novgorodtsev is also long gone.
  17. K-50
    K-50 18 October 2016 14: 49
    +2
    These sskats only begin to understand something when the roller of countermeasures passes over them or starts moving in their direction. The gentlemen of the owners wanted to give their word, they wanted to take it back, they will come and change their minds back. How is it possible to come to an agreement with such moral omissions? No stability and defending your point of view. In one word, "garbage in the hole."
  18. shultz21070
    shultz21070 18 October 2016 14: 59
    0
    sucked ghouls
  19. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 18 October 2016 15: 00
    0
    Look how! "And in the face?" - gentlemen understand this! Here are surprisingly intelligent become when a rake with a running start ... laughing
  20. kalibr
    kalibr 18 October 2016 15: 05
    0
    This is what should be called the right policy!
  21. win
    win 18 October 2016 15: 09
    +3
    To the paradox:
    Eduard Shevarnadze and his students accuse Russia of all sins,
    and his beloved granddaughter Sofiko advertises the same Russia on
    Russian channel Russia Today

    or

    Arkady Gaidar with "Timur and his team" - love,
    and his grandson Yegor Gaidar with the team (Chubais, etc.) - they do not like ...


    1. Mwg
      Mwg 18 October 2016 15: 44
      0
      Shevardnadze never once accused Russia of anything. Yeltsin pushed him away along with Georgia and he had to flounder himself right up to working with the United States. Well, then, the United States was "amiable" friends and Russia too. Shevardnadze was thrown to Mishiko in the most impudent manner and in a uniform that was unacceptable for Georgia then and now - he was pulled from the podium by the collar of his jacket.
      It’s just that Shevardnadze is a characteristic character from the Central Committee of the CPSU of the late 80s and if he were any other, they would have acted in his situation in exactly the same way.
      1. OlegLex
        OlegLex 18 October 2016 20: 04
        +2
        Well, right white and fluffy. The beacon of democracy, a dual-purpose diplomat, so to spread the GDR is not even expressed in words. some mats ches a word.
      2. sogdianec
        sogdianec 19 October 2016 00: 14
        +1
        They would be silent about Shevardnadze, since you do not know anything. It's just that this "Georgian fox" was always in the shadows, but his deeds were destructive for the USSR and Georgia.

        And who told you that the writer Arkady Gaidar has something to do with these, God forgive me, not for the night mentioned, misunderstandings. Impostors
  22. triglav
    triglav 18 October 2016 15: 09
    +1
    To what. Not Britain, but kindergarten. They don’t think about the consequences at all.
  23. Mwg
    Mwg 18 October 2016 15: 31
    0
    Yeah! It suddenly became frightening on foggy Albion .....
  24. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 18 October 2016 15: 44
    0
    That's right, scoundrels to order to call only retaliatory sanctions.
  25. Krsk
    Krsk 18 October 2016 16: 23
    0
    you have seen a brief illustration of the policy of the "lights of the democratic world" first we do, then we think, then we turn on the "back".
    1. Sergey333
      Sergey333 18 October 2016 20: 14
      +1
      Rear-wheel drive, what to take from them lol
  26. Razvedka_Boem
    Razvedka_Boem 18 October 2016 17: 15
    +2
    Lavrov was asked about freezing RT accounts. He replied - “The situation is quite obvious and I think that we need to recall the old wisdom, which reads something like this:“ never treat others like you would not want them to treat you. ” That, in fact, is all. ”
    Really - that's all)
  27. Fucknato
    Fucknato 18 October 2016 17: 36
    0
    tongue they must be beaten with their own weapons (methods) - and you need to be strong, good
  28. Sofa expert
    Sofa expert 18 October 2016 18: 53
    0
    They carry heresy! Burn heretics !! :)
  29. Sergey333
    Sergey333 18 October 2016 18: 59
    +2
    Miraculously, they did free PR advertising for Russia Today, now it will be watched out of curiosity by those who still did not know anything about it, and found a sore spot in the West that could be pulled again. good
  30. 1536
    1536 18 October 2016 19: 40
    0
    This is a good answer to the adversary!
  31. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 18 October 2016 19: 58
    0
    There would be brains, there would be a concussion ...
  32. OlegLex
    OlegLex 18 October 2016 19: 59
    +1
    Very good, and most importantly, positive news.
    After all, this is actually not a small victory at all, it is first of all an indicator that even the swaggering England has begun to reckon with us. That is, we still regained the status of a power with which to reckon.
  33. Gavril
    Gavril 19 October 2016 02: 37
    0
    Now you need to close the account in that bank, and open it in another.