Military Review
Sign In Register

Sea borders of the Russian Federation will help protect the robotic complex

37
In Russia, a maritime intelligence robotic complex has been created, designed to monitor coastal zones and state borders, reports TASS message source in the Russian defense industry.




“To monitor state borders and coastal zones, a sea-based robotized complex has been created that can work several days at a distance of more than 100 km from the coast”- said the source.

According to him, the complex “without an operator’s participation follows a previously laid route and can independently communicate with submarines and surface ships, as well as with coastal posts.”

He "is equipped with advanced communications and radar systems and can track targets himself and transmit all information about them," the source explained.

The source did not name other characteristics of the complex.
Photos used:
http://forums.airbase.ru
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
37 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. NIKNN
    NIKNN 18 October 2016 13: 11
    +3
    What's the point ??? To deprive seafarers of jobs, and to save on salaries? In my opinion, the cost did not work ....
    1. hirurg
      hirurg 18 October 2016 13: 19
      +16
      Quote: NIKNN
      What's the point ??? To deprive seafarers of jobs, and to save on salaries? In my opinion, the cost did not work ...

      By your logic, the production of land robotic systems deprives the work of tankers and sappers?
      The borders of Russia are vast, there are many holes and there is enough work for everyone.
    2. Homo
      Homo 18 October 2016 13: 49
      +18
      Quote: NIKNN
      What's the point ??? To deprive seafarers of jobs, and to save on salaries? In my opinion, the cost did not work ....

      Yes Yes!
      Why automatic loader in the tank? Charger without work left.
      Why are gun mounts automatic? How many people are left without work.
      And how many people were fired after installing robots on assembly lines!
      And about the miners, I generally keep quiet! The harvesters of how many miners deprived a piece of bread!
      It seems like an adult (if this photo relates to you) and write such nonsense! No.
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 18 October 2016 14: 06
        +5
        Quote: Homo
        Why automatic loader in the tank? Charger without work left.

        A person writes about the issue of value. While the Negro-loader is cheaper than the automatic loader, then there will be a Negro. laughing If you buy and service a combine harvester it will be cheaper than a salary for a bunch of Stakhanovites with Kyle, then it will be a combine harvester. Where is the rubbish? It is a fully working economic market.
        1. Orionvit
          Orionvit 18 October 2016 16: 29
          +3
          The source did not name other characteristics of the complex.
          For especially literate it is written. There are areas where a border guard with binoculars cannot replace high-tech robotic systems. Moreover, this complex serves people much more than a commonplace border guard. Nowadays, it is not enough to put a border guard in a boat with a dog on the border, and assume that the border is locked. And in general, in my opinion, they made a new reconnaissance vessel under the guise of border protection.
      2. NIKNN
        NIKNN 18 October 2016 14: 32
        +2
        Quote: Homo
        It seems like an adult (if this photo relates to you) and write such nonsense!

        Of blame, for you personally ...., apparently did not convey the meaning, probably could not .... request
      3. Corporal Valera
        Corporal Valera 18 October 2016 16: 46
        +1
        Quote: Homo
        And how many people were fired after installing robots on assembly lines!

        Taki a lot!
  2. kolkulon
    kolkulon 18 October 2016 13: 15
    0
    Correct. Che burn fuel. Let the robots patrol.
    1. Orionvit
      Orionvit 18 October 2016 16: 30
      +1
      Do robots use the "holy spirit"?
  3. Mentat
    Mentat 18 October 2016 13: 19
    +4
    Quote: NIKNN
    What's the point ??? To deprive seafarers of jobs, and to save on salaries? In my opinion, the cost did not work ....

    North close, obviously.
    And in general, with the help of such complexes, the sea border will become much “denser”. Unless, of course, they show their effectiveness in practice.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 18 October 2016 13: 24
      +3
      Quote: Mentat
      North close, obviously.

      Yeah, the robot in the north just needs to swim "along the pre-laid route." There is no interference whatsoever. wink
    2. Orionvit
      Orionvit 18 October 2016 16: 36
      +1

      “To monitor state borders and coastal zones, a sea-based robotized complex has been created that can work several days at a distance of more than 100 km from the coast”
      Where is this border 100 km from the coast? It seems to me that this is far from an unusual border ship, and its tasks are far from the same. It's like in the Soviet Union, on military transport workers, wrote "Aeroflot".
  4. Aviagr
    Aviagr 18 October 2016 13: 21
    0
    Only one? Hundreds of THOUSAND underwater gliders and robotic sailing catamarans must fulfill these goals. And not 6 days, but 6 MONTHS of autonomy! And not 100km, but THOUSANDS including: intercepting the enemy still on the way to the borders ...
    In general, again crystal huswapping trusted FPI ...
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 18 October 2016 13: 25
      +5
      Quote: Aviagr
      Hundreds of THOUSAND underwater gliders and robotic sailing catamarans must fulfill these goals. And not 6 days, but 6 MONTHS of autonomy! And not 100km, but THOUSANDS including: intercepting the enemy on the way to the borders ...

      Give me the Death Star!
      1. gispanec
        gispanec 18 October 2016 13: 30
        +1
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Give me the Death Star!

        well, I do not!! give hundreds of thousands
        death stars
        !!!!!!!
        1. Aviagr
          Aviagr 18 October 2016 13: 32
          0
          Why a Star? Enough and a dozen Meteorites such as the Tunguska or a little more than Chelyabinsk ...
          Although you are more familiar with Sofas - also an option ... I need to drop a pair of leather under the windows ..
          1. Vladimirets
            Vladimirets 18 October 2016 13: 36
            +4
            Quote: Aviagr
            Although you are more familiar with Sofas - also an option ... I need to drop a pair of leather under the windows ..

            Judging by your comment, this is more familiar to you as sofas.
          2. gispanec
            gispanec 18 October 2016 18: 22
            +1
            Quote: Aviagr
            Why a Star? Enough and a dozen Meteorites

            wassat fool you have problems with humor ..... sympathize .. negative
    2. alean245
      alean245 18 October 2016 13: 39
      +5
      Only one? Hundreds of THOUSAND underwater gliders and robotic sailing catamarans must fulfill these goals. And not 6 days, but 6 MONTHS of autonomy! And not 100km, but THOUSANDS

      Saturn no longer pour. laughing
      1. Aviagr
        Aviagr 18 October 2016 14: 47
        0
        Yes, they also laughed at machine guns and tried to ban them - reality turned out to be higher than ridicule ...
        By the way, the Saxons already conduct exercises with them: http://defence.ru/article/britanci-nachali-massht
        abnoe-uchenie-s-robotami /
        So this is a very near future ...
        It is important not to be exterminated by the Papuans or Maya Indians - they also hoped for the strength of their hands, arrows and boomerangs ...

        Gliders, like UAVs, will dominate in the next wars ... Karabakh is the first bell ...
        1. alean245
          alean245 18 October 2016 16: 52
          +3
          It is important not to be exterminated by the Papuans or Maya Indians - they also hoped for the strength of their hands, arrows and boomerangs ...

          Yes, I do not argue, but the numbers you indicated in the form of hundreds of thousands of units and thousands of kilometers of power reserve to put it mildly somewhat fantastic.
          1. Aviagr
            Aviagr 18 October 2016 17: 33
            0
            I develop them with a view to minimizing the cost of production for mass production. There will be exactly hundreds of thousands, and then millions (in a few years). The whole question is: who will be the first to reach this line. - Answer: most likely China, because they already have established production of electronics to equip millions of robotic devices.
            "Ours" all indulge in Iota-phones in platinum cases ...
      2. Orionvit
        Orionvit 18 October 2016 16: 40
        +2
        Why not pour? He is trying to argue. laughing
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 18 October 2016 14: 46
      +2
      Aviagr
      Only one? Hundreds of THOUSAND underwater gliders and robotic sailing catamarans must fulfill these goals.

      And now we take and recall the notorious SOSUS system ... and what mattresses we wanted to create before it. A hundred thousand gliders and catamarans, even the United States together with China will not be mastered.
      And not 6 days, but 6 MONTHS of autonomy!

      It’s nothing that in the technologies for the construction of UAVs and amphibious astronauts, we are substantially behind the West ... yes, at first, during the times of the USSR, we were leaders in this field, but 25 years of handicap to the West, threw us back significantly. And we are now in the role of catching up, both in quality and in the number of robotic unmanned systems.
      1. Aviagr
        Aviagr 18 October 2016 17: 36
        0
        Quote: NEXUS
        It’s nothing that in the technologies for the construction of UAVs and amphibious astronauts, we are substantially behind the west ..

        You are behind, I am not.
        Just the problem: give me the opportunity to realize my ideas. -No, now the dough is being cut, how it will end - come in, please, you are welcome, to work for free in Stakhanov's style!
  5. marshes
    marshes 18 October 2016 13: 39
    0
    An interesting complex, it is a pity the appearance photo is not yes technical data.
    This is how much you can save.
    We in our sector, shallow, the Caspian would not hurt.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 18 October 2016 13: 41
      0
      Quote: marshes
      sorry photo no appearance

      As it is not, the article has a photo, and the name: 10410. smile
      1. marshes
        marshes 18 October 2016 13: 51
        0
        Something doesn’t display, strange. Only the image of the ship. But where is the robot itself?
        Quote: Vladimirets
        name: 10410

        A patrol boat, by the way, the displacement is not bad for us. 375 tons.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 18 October 2016 13: 53
          +1
          Quote: marshes
          Something doesn’t display, strange. Only the image of the ship. But where is the robot itself?
          Quote: Vladimirets
          name: 10410
          A patrol boat, by the way, the displacement is not bad for us. 375 tons.

          A joke, dear, a joke. hi
          1. marshes
            marshes 18 October 2016 14: 08
            0
            Quote: Vladimirets
            A joke, dear, a joke.

            Small vessels, in general, create big problems. They are not visible from ship and coastal radars, Our satellite does not constantly "hang" over the Caspian Sea. And here, in addition to poaching on sturgeon, the slaughter of seals began. region. Here in Iran, mini submarines were seen. Frog men, possibly the installation of bottom mines, etc.
  6. bald
    bald 18 October 2016 17: 31
    +1
    It's great! It is high time. Our children will freeze less. And most importantly, tight guard of the sea borders. One thing excites a little bit. Interception and a hole in the fence (when capturing a robot there must be an understudy !!!).
  7. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 18 October 2016 17: 35
    0
    And if potential friends want to swim to the robot and kidnap him, or connect to him to collect data?
    1. Aviagr
      Aviagr 18 October 2016 17: 39
      0
      Swim-plug in - and kidnap: since he is ONE !!!
      Hundreds of thousands are needed - a network-centric and mutual protection. Moreover, the mutual: glider-catamaran.
  8. weksha50
    weksha50 18 October 2016 19: 47
    0
    I read the article, read the comments ... But still I misunderstood something ...
    Well, in fine weather, and in the absence of any icebergs there, it’s clear ... The Americans have already followed this principle - their robots will hunt for our submarines ... But I don’t understand how these robotic ships will monitor the situation in stormy weather ... Or is everything in advance - in the bays, in the houses?

    And so, logically, this is most likely not a border ship, but a reconnaissance ship ... It will monitor both surface and underwater conditions and transmit information where it is necessary ...
  9. INF
    INF 19 October 2016 08: 07
    0
    In any case, a person with a keyboard and joystick will sit on the ground.
  10. Mentat
    Mentat 19 October 2016 08: 18
    0
    Quote: Vladimirets
    Quote: Mentat
    North close, obviously.

    Yeah, the robot in the north just needs to swim "along the pre-laid route." There is no interference whatsoever. wink

    And in the open sea, in your opinion, there can also be no interference? There is no one in the coastal zone either; I have not heard shipping - what it is. Sorry, but you wrote utter nonsense, and someone else gave you a shot.

    For this device to go to sea, it must have obviouslymechanisms to prevent collisions with ships and obstacles.
  11. Mentat
    Mentat 19 October 2016 08: 22
    0
    Quote: Mama_Cholli
    And if potential friends want to swim to the robot and kidnap him, or connect to him to collect data?

    In stealth mode? Well, these are elementary considerations! Video monitoring of the situation and a set of sensors. When an object is detected, it transmits data (it is written in the article about it), when capturing, the electronics self-destruct.