The pipe is not energy, pipe geopolitical

35
There is an opinion that the “Turkish Stream” is a geopolitical project rather than an energy one. Thanks to the new pipe, Russia will be able to bypass Ukraine and will get additional access to the commodity markets of Western Europe, and Turkey will begin to buy natural gas much cheaper. Some Western experts are confident that the purpose of laying the pipeline is to visually show the international community a rapprochement between Ankara and Moscow and demonstrate political force.

The pipe is not energy, pipe geopolitical




Andy Aller writes on this topic on the site. "Marketplace".

Russia and Turkey, the author notes, are hardly able to agree when it comes to international relations. But both governments reached an agreement on the construction of a pipeline under the Black Sea. Such a deal will allow Russia to gain additional access to the markets of Western Europe, and Turkey will provide the opportunity to “get gas for cheap”.

At the moment, reminds Aller, Russia supplies most of its natural gas through the territory of Ukraine, which has repeatedly increased gas transit tariffs. Russia has been trying to bypass Ukraine for many years now, and the Turk Stream pipeline would help to resolve this issue.

David Goldwyn, president of Goldwyn Global Strategies, a former special envoy in the field of international energy at the US Department of State, says that price is currently an obstacle to the deal between the Russians and the Turks. First of all, Turkey and Russia should agree on the cost of gas, and then there will be a real possibility of laying a pipe. The cost of gas supplied before was a stumbling block, the expert recalled. It came even to international arbitration. (Indeed, let’s add, the Turkish state-owned company Botas filed a lawsuit against Gazprom with the Stockholm arbitration court last October, demanding a reduction in the price of Russian gas. Until then, the parties failed to agree on a discount. The parties argued over the Botas contract Gazprom Export dated December 2014.)

Therefore, to talk about something prematurely.

Moreover, the price is not the only problem. In November last year, a Turkish aircraft shot down a Russian military aircraft near the Syrian border. Since then, the relations of the two states have cooled.

On the other hand, at the moment any agreement between Russia and Turkey will be perceived as a very important geopolitical event.

Henri Barkey, director of the Middle East program at the Wilson Center, believes that the “Turkish Stream” deal is far less related to energy than to geopolitics.

The goal is not the pipe itself, the expert believes: “The goal is to show that Turkey and Russia are able to get along. Especially after the difficulties in the relationship. And if the pipeline is built only for this, well, that's great. "

What is important here for the Turks is not so much the energy supply of Turkey and Western Europe, as a demonstration of political influence to the rest of the world, Barki said.

As for the plans to build the Turkish Stream, we will add that they are fully synchronized with the end of the terms of the Gazprom contract with Ukraine on transit.

“In accordance with the intergovernmental agreement at the bottom of the Black Sea, the project implementation period is December 2019 of the year. This is fully synchronized with the contract between Gazprom and Naftogaz, which is also valid until the end of 2019, ”he quotes Interfax Minister of Energy Alexander Novak.

Novak also said that gas volumes in Ukraine’s storage facilities are insufficient for the normal passage of the coming winter: “Today, according to our estimates, there is not enough gas to pass the winter in the UGS of Ukraine. During the summer period, about one and a half billion cubic meters of gas was not pumped into it. Today, for the normal passage of the Ukrainian partners must additionally download this volume. "

"For our part, we are ready to fully ensure the transit of gas for European consumers and the supply of gas to Ukraine for injection into underground gas storage facilities," Novak added. But it will take money: "... with the availability of appropriate financial resources, Ukraine will have the necessary volume of gas supplied."

Also Interfax announces further “flows” that Russia is ready to tackle. Today we are talking not only about Turkey, but also about India. Even this trend in Moscow is already considered "promising."

According to the same Novak, Russia considers promising a project to lay a gas pipeline to India. The working group will study it carefully: “We consider this project quite promising, but requiring careful study.”

According to the Russian minister, the project should now be worked out regarding the feasibility study, payback and efficiency.

The minister also pointed out that Russia is interested in supplying liquefied natural gas to India: “It was about supplying not only pipeline gas, but also liquefied gas, and the second phase of the Arctic LNG-2 project.” We invite Indian companies to participate not only in the capital, but also in the supply of LNG for their country. ”

On the terms of the likely "promising" contracts are not reported.

October 17 finally appeared long-awaited information about the discount on Russian gas for Turkey. True, the numbers were not named again. But it is clear that the discount will definitely be.

The discount for Turkey will depend on the volume of consumption, said Alexander Novak. “And there is still to be finalized the formula, which to date has so far only been formulated in the form of principles. In general, we are ready to move. Now work between our companies will be continued, ”the official said. "Lenta.ru".

By the way, on the same day, the press reported on the settlement of price gas disagreements between Russia and Belarus.

In an interview with the Russia 24 TV channel, the same Alexander Novak, who in recent days had to make a lot of statements and where to go, said that Russia and Belarus had reached a compromise on the cost of gas supply.

“As for the situation with the debt for gas, which arose this year, I can now say that we have found a solution. All conditions are stipulated, the key of these conditions is that all debts will be repaid, and gas will be paid at a price in accordance with the agreement according to the formula that was in effect until that time, ”the minister said. "Russian newspaper".

The publication reminds that negotiations on the price of gas supplies of the Russian Federation and Belarus are from the beginning of 2016 year. In early October, our Ministry of Energy reported a large debt of Belarus (of the order of 270-300 million dollars). But in Minsk, the debt was not recognized, pointing to the injustice of the contract price in 132,77 dollars per thousand cubic meters.

As a result, as we see, Russia not only does not reduce its dependence on the global commodity environment, but, on the contrary, is increasing it, getting ready to draw endless “streams” to all sides of the globe up to India and supply gas with discounts. Regarding Ankara, it makes no sense even to think that the Turks will not claim a big discount for themselves: otherwise there will simply be no “flow”.

The volume of gas supplies for export has greatly increased during the years of the rule of Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin. Shipments abroad from 1985 to 2015 quantified more than doubled. By statistical data to Gazprom Export, in 1985, 69,4 billion cubic meters of gas went to non-CIS countries, in 2000, 130,3 billion cubic meters, and in 2015, 158,6 billion cubic meters. m. Most gas goes to Western European countries (on the 1 location Germany) and to Turkey.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    35 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +13
      19 October 2016 05: 52
      As a result, as we see, Russia not only does not reduce its dependence on the global commodity market, but, on the contrary, is increasing it, preparing to stretch endless “flows” to all sides of the globe right up to India and supply gas at a discount.


      There is nothing to rejoice ... our country is actively getting rid of its natural resources by supplying them to the whole world ... to whom is war and to whom is a loud coin from disguised robbery
      people.
      What will happen when the reserves of gas, oil of rare metals begin to run out ... how will our descendants live without the natural resources necessary for survival.
      Such a policy is a policy of parasites on the body of a healthy organism ... this is an impasse in the long run ... do they really don’t understand it in KREMLIN ... do they hope to survive somewhere later in LONDON or BRUSSELS ... it’s sad to see a limited mind in long-term forecasts ... we live one day without realizing that we are sawing the branch on which we are sitting.
      1. +7
        19 October 2016 06: 50
        Not everything is so bad and sad. It’s not reasonable to sell gas, but how to do it is another matter.
      2. +4
        19 October 2016 07: 06
        so the current rulers will no longer be when the minerals of Russia run out
      3. +9
        19 October 2016 07: 59
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        There is nothing to rejoice ... our country is actively getting rid of its natural resources, supplying them to the whole world ..


        Sells for a coin, but does not dispose of-doing rightbecause if Russia does not sell, other countries will be sold, gladly taking its place.
        Another question is how correctly exploit the fields and distribute the received financial resources ....
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        how our descendants will live without the natural resources necessary for survival.


        Everyone who cares about their descendants can be advised to start with themselves: immediately and permanently stop driving their own cars in order to provide descendants with at least clean air and save from climate warming caused by the greenhouse effect.
        1. +1
          19 October 2016 08: 55
          Everyone who cares about their descendants can be advised to start with themselves: immediately and permanently stop driving their own cars in order to provide descendants with at least clean air and save from climate warming caused by the greenhouse effect.


          belay You tell the Americans who have killed all living creatures in the Gulf of Mexico and put the entire planet on the brink of a planetary catastrophe ...

          adviser.
          1. 0
            22 October 2016 09: 09
            Quote: The same Lech


            belay You tell the Americans who have killed all living creatures in the Gulf of Mexico and put the entire planet on the brink of a planetary catastrophe ...

            adviser.

            By the way, yes, that catastrophe on a new horizon in the Gulf of Mexico raised the average cost of food in the world by 3%, because the world is global and everything is connected.
            It seems to be not much, but in reality millions of people have slipped to starvation.
            I agree, a lot of questions.
      4. +1
        19 October 2016 09: 30
        It’s important not to sell resources, but how to spend money on the sale. If now Russia stops selling, then it will be left with nothing.

        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        adviser.


        Hmm .. And where does the United States? If you are so happy for the future, then walking is the best thing for you. Adviser smile
        1. +1
          19 October 2016 10: 36
          If you are so happy for the future, then walking is the best thing for you. Advisor smile


          Yes, I gladden and do not hide this and I like walking on foot and use the car only for business ... and I prefer to run on foot and it’s good for health and I save time from traffic jams.
          But I am not asking the question about this ...
          you need to develop and implement technologies that do not require large consumption of oil products and coal ... for example, energy, electronics, etc., etc.
          It is necessary to move away from the commodity economy, however, this topic has long snapped up.
      5. +3
        19 October 2016 11: 33
        It would be nice to make a valve with a pipe branch to Bulgaria. So, just in case. And as for "leaving the bowels for posterity", will it be if we do not survive now?
      6. 0
        19 October 2016 13: 43
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        .. our country is actively getting rid of its natural resources by supplying them to the whole world ... to whom is war and to whom is a loud coin from masked robbery
        people.
        What will happen when the reserves of gas, oil of rare metals begin to run out ... how will our descendants live without the natural resources necessary for survival.
        Such a policy is a policy of parasites on the body of a healthy organism ... this is an impasse in the long run ... do they really don’t understand it in KREMLIN ... do they hope to survive somewhere later in LONDON or BRUSSELS ... it’s sad to see a limited mind in long-term forecasts ... we live one day without realizing that we are sawing the branch on which we are sitting.
        and who is Lyokha, is happy? we, from the "plow", only for the 80th, at least gasoline, we rejoice until the "Chinese" knock
        ...
      7. +1
        19 October 2016 14: 06
        Quote the same LYOKHA - "... There is nothing to be happy about ... our country is actively getting rid of its natural resources by supplying them to the whole world ... who is war and who is a hard-hitting coin from disguised robbery
        people ... "
        ---------------------------
        Take a look at the world beyond the borders of Russia, and you will see that the developed or rich countries such as the USA, Great Britain, Norway, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, China, Australia, Canada extract natural resources with great pleasure and without remorse.
        At the same time, none of the listed countries calls itself a column, gas station or boiler room, although they probably well understand that any production on an industrial scale not only benefits people, but also harms the environment.

        Since this happens everywhere, it is obvious that humanity as a whole has not yet found a replacement for oil, gas and other natural resources, and our descendants will have to solve this problem if it really turns out that the listed minerals are limited and not produced in the bowels of the Earth by the Earth itself constantly.

        Quote from the article - "There is an opinion that the Turkish Stream is a geopolitical project rather than an energy one ..."
        ------------------------

        As I understand it, the Author decided to retell us excerpts from articles in the Anglo-Saxon press about "insidious and cunning Russia." I don't know what's new here, except that all excerpts contain a set of standard clichés of the Western press in order to once again show how bad Russia is. We have long been accustomed to this and it is pointless to argue with the West, since you will simply waste time in stupid wrangling.
        And in fact, all this geopolitics was sucked out of the finger by the Anglo-Saxons themselves in order to close off ordinary business ties. After all, when we agreed on the construction of the South Stream with Bulgaria, was it geopolitics? No. There was a simple desire of Russia to replace the unpredictable and thieving Ukraine as a transit country. That's all. No, they didn’t allow to negotiate with Bulgaria, so we had to negotiate with Turkey, and Romania itself "fell off". That's the whole alignment, since of the three Black Sea countries on the west coast, only Turkey agreed to the laying of a pipeline, which by the way still needs to be built.

        So the Anglo-Saxons have another job outlined - how to embroil Turkey with Russia by attracting geopolitics, ecology, economic terrorism (this is in relation to "poor" Ukraine), human rights, gays and lesbians, etc. to the construction of the gas pipeline.
        The money has already been set aside, the scribblers have already pinned their feathers, the company has already begun and another reason for extending sanctions against Russia too.
      8. 0
        19 October 2016 14: 43
        It is easier and much cheaper to change the regime in Ukraine to pro-Russian than to invest $ 23 billion in Turkish flow and be disconnected by the Turks at any time in connection with another aggravation of relations between the countries.
        1. +1
          19 October 2016 16: 05
          Quote - "... It is easier and much cheaper to change the regime in Ukraine to a pro-Russian one, ..."
          ------------------

          You did the analysis and calculated the costs, or just like that with a kondachka you say so.
          For example, some experts believe that it is better not to spend money on changing the next "pro-Russian" regime in Ukraine, but to wait until everything there resolves by itself or falls apart by itself. Based on the real state of affairs in Russia, economic and political, at the moment the second option is more preferable for Russia, despite the fact that it may drag on for years, well, Russia is in no hurry to go anywhere.
      9. +4
        19 October 2016 16: 12
        In 2015, Russia exported mineral products. These are gas, oil, coal and their processing such as gasoline fuel oil, coke, etc. for $ 220 billion. And this is taking into account the fall in prices. IN 2013 - AT 370 BILLION DOLLARS. The second largest export item is metallurgy. Its products were exported at 33 billion dollars. The defense industry for example - 12-15 billion dollars a year gives. Well, what are you going to replace with 220 billion dollars? What are we going to sell? What should we arm the army for, at least maintain pensions at the same level, build infrastructure? Over 15 years, more than 160 large bridges have been built in the Russian Federation, some of which are multi-kilometer. All ? We will not build anything else? Or to reduce salaries to state employees?
        Well, as for the constant nonsense about some villains sticking to the pipe I will explain on the fingers.
        In 2013, oil was worth a hundred; in 2015, it fell to $ 30. Compare your standard of living and the standard of living of relatives in 2013 and 2015 and the difference between them will be what you received from the export of oil and other mineral products. That was your share.
        Another matter is that the independence of the export of oil and gas and the cessation of their export are different things. Independence from the export of mineral products is the excess of unrelated exports over total imports of everything. In 2015, excluding VPK, exports not related to mineral products amounted to approximately $ 124 billion. Total imports - $ 181 billion. Export of mineral products - 219 billion dollars. Arms sales of approximately another 2 billion.
        Thus, non-MP exports cover two thirds of imports. If you add VPK - three quarters. That's when it will exceed total imports - then the Russian Federation will become independent from the export of mineral products. If we are talking about crude oil and gas, then it is already independent of them.
        How to achieve independence from the export of mineral products? To increase exports not related to them and import substitute everything that we can. request
        Since 2013, in 2 years it has been possible to reduce imports in the "Machinery, equipment and vehicles" column from $ 152 billion to $ 82, that is, by $ 70 billion. Total imports fell from 310 billion to 181 billion. That is, almost 120 billion. It is clear that, first of all, the lightest was replaced by import and it will be more difficult in the future. But it is quite possible to reduce imports by 10-20 billion dollars a year.
        Well, to increase exports, markets are needed. For example Egypt, Syria Iraq and Iran. In sum, they give the population like ours and this is an excellent market for us, which must be intensified. Economics is everywhere, as is politics. wink
      10. 0
        22 October 2016 08: 03
        What will happen when gas and oil reserves run out
        Nothing will happen. Earth is a generator of hydrocarbons and not their warehouse.
        and to whom the loud coin from a disguised robbery

        Rob the loot. The slogan is quite famous.
    2. +10
      19 October 2016 06: 52
      Same lech "There is nothing to be happy about ... our country is actively getting rid of its natural resources by supplying them to the whole world ... to whom the war and to whom the hard currency from the disguised plunder of the people."
      Not to develop natural resources is the height of stupidity, but how to develop them, that’s the question! Definitely need to develop! But even after mining, it is necessary to subject the source material to deep processing within the country. Do not give raw materials to the aliens, but bring these raw materials to the final stage of processing themselves. I was constantly outraged and outraged by the supply of round timber to the Finns, this is nothing but wrecking! And then at an exorbitant price to buy Finnish-made furniture from Russian wood in Russia ?! Are you weak? How oil fields are exploited, this is a special article, such fields as the legendary Samotlor, calculated with competent exploitation (competent, not predatory) for 100 years, ended in the first 25 years. and now they are producing oil with such a water cut that it becomes simply unprofitable to extract it! And what harm is being done to ecology, to the fragile northern nature, it is simply incomprehensible to the mind! The most depressing thing is that we remind robbers to plunder into someone else's territory to rob, and not the zealous owners of their own resources!
      1. +1
        19 October 2016 06: 57
        !
        And then at an exorbitant price to buy Finnish-made furniture from Russian wood in Russia ?! Are you weak?


        hi This is exactly what Nikolai I mean.
        Our descendants will be deprived of their resources to create their industry ... this is stupid.
      2. +1
        19 October 2016 10: 36
        Quote: NMPanfil
        outraged supplies of round timber to the Finns

        -Dear, this is also politics, like Serbian cucumbers. Like Israeli vegetables to Estonia in the burden of small arms (A considerable part of the goods sold turned out to be defective, which caused an international scandal that ended in the fall of the Estonian government. As follows from the publication, the Israelis who participated in the transaction, they made good money, and some now prefer not to remember it. But the fate of the people involved in this story from the Estonian side was not reflected in the best way. http://rus.delfi.ee/press/mk_estonia/top -skandalo
        vv-estonskoj-armii-ot-afery-s-pokupkoj-oruzhiya-
        do-dedovschiny? id = 64986402
    3. +1
      19 October 2016 07: 08
      This pipe on the border with Greece rests against the European Commission, as with Bulgaria, Greece is a big debtor to German banks
      1. 0
        19 October 2016 08: 17
        That's right. The problem of UP is not a pipe, but US pressure on the EU. We have a bankrupt bank related to the construction of the stream. If the new flow goes through Greece or Romania, then the United States will also find ways to disrupt the project.
      2. +1
        19 October 2016 11: 39
        They will draw a pipe and Greece will settle accounts with Germany. Then the grandmother said in two. smile
        1. 0
          21 October 2016 20: 00
          in vo, Greece will conclude a contract with Gazprom for an over-long period with the help of which it will pay off debts, and Gazprom will prescribe fucking huge compensation for all firefighters in case of termination of the contract ... we will earn geopolitical points so we will not lose money, and our opponents will help themselves. What more could you ask for?
    4. +4
      19 October 2016 07: 14
      the author, as always, says half the truth. Yes, the transit agreement with Ukraine ends in 2019, but the contracts with the EU countries for the supply of gas end much later, between 2020-2035. The most recent contract seems to be with Italy until 2035. The contracts determine the points of gas delivery to customers. They are in Poland, Slovakia, Austria. And buyers are not interested in how the gas should be delivered to gas delivery points. A transit agreement is a matter of dispute between Ukraine and Russia. Russia cannot arbitrarily force EU countries to join the Turkish stream at their own expense without their consent before the expiration of the contracts. That's when Russia will say that you want gas by the end of the contracts - connect yourself to the Turkish stream, and then they will think. Or maybe they don’t want to. Then, for the sake of profit, you will have to leave transit through Ukraine. Therefore, dreams of completely circumventing Ukraine may remain on paper. And one of the conditions of the SP-2 from the EU was the continued supply of gas through Ukraine. And the EU has enough time to reduce the consumption of Russian gas at the expense of other suppliers, energy-saving technologies, and switching to other types of fuel. What they do
      1. 0
        19 October 2016 16: 43
        Quote - "... energy-saving technologies, switching to other types of fuel ..."
        -----------------

        I wonder what energy-saving technologies and the transition to other types of fuel you mean.
        For industry, where the bulk of the supplied gas and oil goes, these are raw materials and no substitutes have yet been found. Or maybe they found, but in Russia, the USA, Norway and Algeria they still do not know about this?
        1. 0
          21 October 2016 17: 49
          For Russia, energy-saving technologies are a black box. Therefore, we know little. They are developed only in the west and in Japan. . And replacing gas with coal in Germany is already a real thing. And they will make filters from ash and gas emissions at the highest level.
          1. 0
            21 October 2016 20: 06
            to reduce consumption due to the residential sector is not a problem, the only question is price ... even electricity and heating can be converted to other resources, but again the price ....
    5. +6
      19 October 2016 08: 17
      The Turkish stream seems to be a big mistake: instead of Ukraine, as a transit country, Russia gets an equally capricious and capricious "partner", who in reality is Russia's sworn and eternal enemy and competitor. Which will not use in the future to take advantage of its strategic position as a transit country to blackmail Russia and knock out all kinds of undeserved preferences (today's bargaining on the price of gas is already a great example).

      It seems that it was necessary to finish off South Stream in any way through Bulgaria, historically, in spite of everything, more friendly to Russia, where the top of power, by the way, may change, but the pipeline will already be there.

      Or even freeze projects until better times ..........
      1. +2
        19 October 2016 09: 33
        Not a mistake. The heading says well and concisely why these projects are needed.
      2. +8
        19 October 2016 10: 56
        Whatever is said before the public, South Stream is not buried at all. It has been discontinued in the form in which it was originally designed. Now the Bulgarian and Russian sides, with the knowledge of Brucelle, are developing a new option. Pipe along the bottom of the Black Sea from the Crimea to the Bulgarian Dobrudja. This is generally the shortest possible distance and such a project will be cheaper from all the others / look at the map /. UP-2 will have less capital than UP-1 but its goal is to differentiate gas flows to the EU from a few places. At the same time, Russia is also solving the problem of the gasification of Crimea. At the moment next to the bridge over the Kerch Channel, a pipe is also being prepared for which the throughput is 3 times greater than the needs of the Crimea ... So far, everything is at the initial stages of training. A lot of things depend on the political situation in the world and in the EU. So far, the EU is not ready to recognize the Russian Crimea, but everything has changed since time ...
        1. 0
          19 October 2016 12: 55
          Thanks for the interesting remark. Unfortunately, the construction of the duplicating highway South Crimea - Bulgaria will most likely be blocked by Brussels.
          1. 0
            21 October 2016 20: 13
            only ours will work out and offer in any case, because it is inexpensive, and even allows us to earn geopolitical and information points, because if the EU again prohibits Bulgaria from making money, then Bulgaria will demand something in return, and even if we do not get anything, then we will supply a "friendly European family". lol

            Yes, and we can offer our oligarchs to buy the gas transportation companies there (from southern Europe) and lay the gas transportation ring through them, due to which in the future we will cut down a lot of money and geopolitical points :) Here, all our tops will have a lot of benefits ...
    6. +3
      19 October 2016 14: 20
      There is no point in driving a stream to Turkey.

      Because for supplies to the EU, you still need to start this pipe from Turkey to Bulgaria or Greece.

      Brussels benefits from transit through Ukraine as In such a tricky way, the EU supports the Bandera regime in Ukraine.

      I think the most normal way out is to stop gas supplies through Ukraine in general, relying on force majeure and imposing sanctions against our country.
      1. 0
        21 October 2016 20: 26
        I sell apples, but I’m not selling you, I don’t like your face. lol

        Brussels does not care about Ukraine and Bandera, but don’t give a damn about gas, and don’t give a damn about the hemorrhoids that the USA can arrange for them. By our flows, we give Brussels leverage over the United States, and at the same time prevent the United States from spoiling our relations with Brussels and reduce the boiling of shit on Ukraine ...
    7. +3
      19 October 2016 22: 56
      If gas is geopolitics, then the Soviet Union did not have to collapse.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"