Britain closed RT bank accounts

Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of Russia Today TV channel, in her Twitter microblog, reported on the blocking of all the bank accounts of the television company in Britain. Recall that RT has several offices in different countries, including the United Kingdom. In recent years, the British authorities have taken all measures to settle accounts with the Russian television channel, which clearly prevents the Western media from pouring out lies and sowing propaganda among their viewers.

From Margarita Simonyan's message Twitter:

We have closed accounts in Britain. All accounts. "The decision is not subject to revision." Long live free speech!

Official comments from the regulator of the media in Britain at the moment did not arrive. However, it can be assumed that British officials are ready to present the "official reason" for closing the RT accounts, which, as the practice of anti-Russian measures shows, is always attracted by the ears and furnished as a "sound decision".

In Britain itself, where there are quite a few fans of the Russian TV channel, which also broadcasts in English, the authorities did not call RT a “mouthpiece of Kremlin propaganda”. In this case, how to call, for example, the “Russian service of the BBC”, which quietly continues to broadcast to Russia, is a separate question.

Reducing accounts, closed accounts ... Democracy ...

Comments

[Muvka]

Took yes closed the BBC. The very first bark.

[St Petrov]

Chubais must be closed there the whole Saxon world will conquer

it will be a Russian hook in the insolent face of Britons

and it’s ridiculous to read about democracy and freedom of speech - when it comes to London - where power is inherited (and I’m not only about the crown, but also about the House of Lords) and the elections have absolutely no effect.

Well, freedom of speech with Asange sitting at the embassy is sur

Well, it's like mattresses with shouts of rights and law in the presence of guantanomo

Russians only play nobility. But this game is somehow bespontovaya.

[Bath]

Editor-in-Chief of Russia Today Margarita Simonyan I’m just thinking about a great country whom you just can’t meet hypothetically in it, but in Armenia on any channels there is at least one Russian?

[St Petrov]

Almost everyone left Armenia for Russia and Omeriku simply.

And so Margarita is clever (not, of course, I’m personally not familiar with it and the gamna has surfaced for several years)

at the age of 25, to lead such a thing as RT - and be a successful broadcasting company, making competition for SNN, FOX NEWS and BBS.

And that's all for a few years and at that age. Explanatory Margarita if not cool.

[Genry]

Quote: s-t Petrov

Explanatory Margarita if not cool.

The logic is top notch!

[elmi]

You need to answer to mirror-block all BBC accounts in Russia, otherwise other pro-Western countries, using the example of Britain, will begin to block accounts. And you can, and you need to close all sorts of NGOs in Russia

[Delink]

In general, close all English channels broadcasting in Russian and English.
And cartoon filtering to do for our children.
And bring Cheburashka home.

[Monos]

Ahhhh ... !!! How lovely!
Euronews: US-led international terrorist coalition!!!

[arane]

Quote: Bath

Editor-in-Chief of Russia Today Margarita Simonyan I’m just thinking about a great country whom you just can’t meet hypothetically in it, but in Armenia on any channels there is at least one Russian?

Why did you blurt out? Maybe there is, although probably not. What's the difference?

[Shadow of darkness]

Chubais? Yes, if at least they are charged with those cases that he has already done, then we can safely admit that the authorities began to recover.

[There are a lot of us]

And you can both Chubais. They stand each other ...

[arnulla]

Yes, the fact of the matter is that our Air Force accounts will not be closed. So they will continue to chew on snot about freedom of speech ...

[elmi]

You can still deprive the accreditation of BBC journalists. The answer must be strong, for otherwise they do not understand.

[Vend]

Quote: Muvka

Took yes closed the BBC. The very first bark.

Britain began its usual business - theft.

[Sergey-72]

It’s all right that cotton wool to roll and play Dartanyanov themselves have already played along, there should be an answer and let them crow on their island.

[KAV]

Really, I don’t understand. In this situation, if they are attacking our segment of news culture, we must respond with counter-sanctions and kick all these pro-Western hotbeds of television broadcasting with kicks! I remember when I tried to take Google’s position and others like it, in connection with the law of storing personal data, everything was decided very quickly as soon as they were given to understand that the Russian market would be closed to them. And then what? Good to chew gum. Tough answers to all lunges! Naglosaksam time to understand that they are NOT the masters in the world!

[St Petrov]

today Asanzhu by the way turned off the Internet)

[Manul]

Quote: Muvka

Took yes closed the BBC. The very first bark.

Don't exaggerate. Closing accounts does not mean closing the channel. Closing will be answered by closing, with the eternal cries of "Russia is the aggressor." You have to play thinner. For example, an ice ax in the head, or candy with a surprise.

[crocodile25]

hello freedom of speech!

And hungry democracy

[Leviton]

Zakharova is smart - she said well: "... London has left in Europe all its obligations on freedom of speech. As they say, into a new life without bad habits."

[hydrox]

You would think that no one knew about this, especially knowing about the special relations between Britain and Russia.
It would be surprising if this did not happen - you need to insure !!

[Zaurbek]

Close the accounts of the Air Force or CNN .... The animal defenders, Greenpeace and whoever else will immediately conquer.

[vinni puk]

And who is watching or listening to them?

[rotmistr60]

Margarita Simonyan

Yesterday I listened to her on the transfer. The smartest woman, it is understandable why at first the Western media (this supposedly the media) sounded the alarm about Russian intervention, after which the authorities began to take action. RT is our window to the Western world, which they want to close under any pretext. I hope that we will find opposition to such actions.

[kostiknet]

Quote: rotmistr60

RT - our window to the western world

This is not entirely true ... Rather, it was their window to the World in general! Well, how now does the layman learn the truth about what is happening at his door? From the politicized ravings of the Air Force, or tantrums on CNN?

[Incvizitor]

There, in the west, they are afraid of the truth like they are trying to fire, and if they can’t ban it, they’re trying to limit it, and the situation in small Britain is different: then Scotland will separate, it will riot and riot, and then they say the truth, it’s destroying their whole western world, everything is lying built.

“Margarita Simonyan said that all accounts of Russia Today TV channel in Britain are blocked, this is a final decision that cannot be reviewed. It seems that, leaving the EU, London has left all its freedom of speech obligations in Europe. As they say, into a new life without bad habits, ”the diplomat noted.

[Pilate]

It seems that, leaving the EU, London left all its obligations on freedom of speech in Europe

You might think that before the release they were so white and fluffy. Freedom of speech blunted. All their obligations were fulfilled. All the criminals were given to us. Directly the best friend of Russia. Yeah. I just don’t understand where the place is.

[pts-m]

“Democracy” in its role, and they are also trying to teach other countries how to wash themselves. When there is no word, then worthless interlocutors pass to the fists.

[Wedmak]

AND? What's next? The truth has become some other?

[Pilate]

The truth did not change. But her last trickle in small Britain was closed. Only the "truthful" and non-profit Western media remained. So glory to democracy !!!!!!

[Wedmak]

Hardly covered. We have not yet seen the answer to this trick.

[Luga]

So everything is done correctly on RT. In the face of RT, we have a weapon that I have long dreamed of - a weapon capable of breaking through the information blockade, in which we have been almost from 1945. And the fact that the underwear uses such methods against ours indicates that other methods are no longer help, that in this field we began not just to resist, but to win.
Keep it up RT!

[hydrox]

No, why bother, if this is an obvious puncture of the RT leadership.
You would think that in Britain there is not a single bank except the British ... some nonsense!

[St Petrov]

you might think that the fin.world will trample against the will of the Saxons. Some nonsense!

I already see this bank D'artagnan - how his license is revoked or a fine is soldered in a certain amount of billions

Such characters here we have are smart on the forum - how the Russian girl has not yet been raised is not clear

from the same series of statements that Mutko did not do something there - as if to put Petrov / Ivanov in his place - events would have developed differently

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: c-Petrov

you might think that the fin.world will trample against the will of the Saxons. Some nonsense!

I already see this bank D'artagnan - how his license is revoked or a fine is soldered in a certain amount of billions

Such characters here we have are smart on the forum - how the Russian girl has not yet been raised is not clear

from the same series of statements that Mutko did not do something there - as if to put Petrov / Ivanov in his place - events would have developed differently

Yeah, Sergeant Petrov is the smartest one.

[Pilate]

I can already see this bank of d'artagnan

Right You with a sword and on you. And you from around the corner and a club (a figurative comparison came to mind).
No, well, if this bank is deprived of a license, then it can sue. You look, and the license will be returned, in court, in three years, maybe
true if this bank does not burn out during this time.

[askort154]

And here is the first swallow. I am far from financial policy, but already in the 90s it was clear that placing our funds in Anglo-Saxon banks was a crime. And when they froze Iran’s accounts, he began to wait for our turn, despite the fact that Kudrin was beating himself in the chest, admonishing that this was the most reliable place.

[igor1981]

If it was supposed that this could happen, then why did they keep the money in English banks ?!

[atalef]

Official comments from the regulator of the media in Britain at the moment did not arrive. However, it can be assumed that British officials are ready to present the "official reason" for closing the RT accounts, which, as the practice of anti-Russian measures shows, is always attracted by the ears and furnished as a "sound decision".

oh well, just RT was caught more than once on outright lies.

In September, Ofcom (Office of Communications), a British media regulator, began investigating RT in the UK in connection with a report mentioning energy company Cuadrilla. The report said that Cuadrilla allegedly dumps poisoned garbage off the coast of Africa.

RT explained that it was about the "presenter's reservation", which mixed up similar names and subsequently apologized.

The Times wrote that Prior to this, Ofcom in 15 cases acknowledged violations of broadcasting rules by RT.

[vovanpain]

Quote: atalef

oh well, just RT was caught more than once on outright lies.

Oh, the Western media is so honest that there’s no place to go. Every newspaper person who pays, sings the hosiery.

[atalef]

Quote: vovanpain

Quote: atalef

oh well, just RT was caught more than once on outright lies.

Oh, the Western media is so honest that there’s no place to go. Every newspaper person who pays, sings the hosiery.

RT can go to court.
An investigation into her activities began neither yesterday nor the day before yesterday. She had time for all actions within the framework of English law.
Something I did not hear that RT appealed to the court.
So what's the problem?
Zakharova was announced only by a fact, but for some reason she did not touch on the reasons at all.
as Kiselyov said

[vovanpain]

Quote: atalef

RT can go to court.

Alexander. Well, just like you do, If you turn to our court, then naturally RT will win the case, and if in London there or in Washington or in Berlin, Well inappropriately make my cat laugh, let the fish burst calmly.

Quote: atalef

there were more than 15 violations and RT did not apply to the court.

Well, after all, the same Air Force’s violations could have accumulated a fig cloud, and you and I are not white and fluffy however. I agree with you, the thunder boomed, the man crossed himself.

Quote: atalef

Actually, if in terms of objectivity and impartiality the English court has always been one of the standards in the world.

Alexander, damn, well, I asked you not to make a cat laugh, damn it.

[atalef]

Quote: vovanpain

lexander. Well, just like you do, If you turn to our court, then naturally RT will win the case, and if in London there or in Washington or in Berlin,

Well, firstly, not a fact, and secondly, and even so, why not use the court site as a denunciation of Western morality and censorship? Free ads and headlines are provided - just what the media needs - so why not?

Quote: vovanpain

Well, after all, the same Air Force of violations could dig a fig

so what's the problem ? Dig.

Quote: vovanpain

Alexander, damn it, well, asked not to make a cat laugh, damn it.

Well, why should the cat stay

I’m actually serious - the English court is still the Court with a capital letter.

[St Petrov]

yeah, on the example of Litvinenko))

[Mordvin 3]

Atalef, about the Aglitz court is no longer funny. Remember Zakayev. What about Berezovsky?

[St Petrov]

They have their own version of "truth". Aleph and others)

They and the Anglo-Saxons do everything honestly and truthfully, and especially in court)

[Shark Lover]

Quote: s-t Petrov

They have their own version of "truth". Aleph and others)

There is no truth in life, because everyone has their own. The Jew has his own, the British have his own, the Negro has his own in Africa, the Indians have their own in America. Truth is measured and to prove whose truth is longer, an occupation is useless. It’s just that you need to add a piece of yours to their truth, smoothly and imperceptibly, then you get some kind of equality at least. What their media did in the 90s and started long before that. True chewing gum, beer, comradeship. After all, they did not strongly criticize the USSR, they showed how fluffy they are, how cool they are, and against this background, people thought of the rest.
Here, one resident of Israel wrote correctly, beauty and crap can be found everywhere, even in Jewishstan, at least in the states, even with us.
I am amazed by something else, like smart men "our Jews", those who are on the site, but, lately, rushing Russophobia, apparently sharpens in Popenhagen, but did he do the right thing))))

[Wedmak]

Just do not take ordinary mistakes for a lie. Western television channels lie much more epic and something is not visible to them claims from the media regulators. Although, what am I talking about? They were created for this purpose in order to cover one version of events that is only beneficial for them.

[atalef]

Quote: Wedmak

Just do not take ordinary mistakes for a lie. Western TV channels lie much more epic and something is not visible to them claims from the media regulators

Do you know what this is about?
I am not the same, but the fact (today it is) was more than 15 violations and the RT did not apply to the court.
Why? can anyone explain? Why would it not seem like using the court’s platform, like a tribune denouncing imaginary democracy and suppressing freedom of speech.
But not why? Is there an answer?

[Wedmak]

But not why? Is there an answer?

Of course have. Point me to at least one judicial precedent in an English court in which Russia or Russian representatives would win. This is the time.
The second - these 15 violations, here I give a tooth, sucked from a finger, and even swollen from a fly to an elephant. That is why RT did not go to court.
However, we will wait for explanations from the British. If they will. And if they are adequate.

[Banishing liberoids]

atalef-what court will appeal to, in Landan, or what? Britons, like all other EU, live with one thought - how much more nasty things to do in Russia! Decision of the court will clearly not be in favor of our channel!

[atalef]

Quote: Exorcist Liberoids

atalef-what court will appeal to, in Landan, or what?

Of course

Quote: Exorcist Liberoids

Britons, like all other EU, live with one thought - how much more nasty things to do in Russia!

Well, it's mutual.

Quote: Exorcist Liberoids

Decision of the court will clearly not be in favor of our channel!

Actually, if in terms of objectivity and impartiality the English court has always been one of the standards in the world.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: atalef

Britons, like all other EU, live with one thought - how much more nasty things to do in Russia!
Well, it's mutual.

And detail...

Quote: atalef

Actually, if in terms of objectivity and impartiality the English court has always been one of the standards in the world.

Oh, dance ... Sasha, aren't you hiding this twenty bucks in your underpants?

[Dym71]

Quote: atalef

Do you know what this is about?
I am not the same, but the fact (today it is) was more than 15 violations and the RT did not apply to the court.

You, Alexander, in your style, as always! Write half of the truth, and then skillfully leave open-ended questions, like - "think for yourself, men!"
Keep, dear, in your own style - back in 2014, the British regulator warned RT that one more fact of bias was enough and the license would be taken away from the channel. However, in the news we read about closing bank accounts!
Why? can anyone explain? Why would it not seem like using the earlier promise to withdraw the license?
But not why? Is there an answer?

[atalef]

Quote: Dym71

You, Alexander, in your style, as always! Write half of the truth, and then skillfully leave open-ended questions, such as - "think for yourself men"

Half? This is good, I don’t even know half.
If you (I think you can, are you? ) I noticed that I didn’t touch the lie of the Republic of Tajikistan, I didn’t lie - of course they did, they all lie and are engaged in propaganda and the Republic of Tajikistan among the mass media is far from last.
I touched on a completely different thing.
If you work in England, work within the local laws and regulations.
If violated - there is 2 way (by the way, I’ll throw off Anek on this topic after comments) -
or in court, or hide behind a rag and not shine.
Proceedings then go over 2's

Quote: Dym71

Why? can anyone explain? Why would it not seem like using the earlier promise to withdraw the license?
But not why? Is there an answer?

I don’t know, and I don’t want to know - these are generally questions for Simonyan.
Let her explain why.
I have one question - why didn’t they appeal and do not go to court (if the whole problem is not a lie when submitting materials, but such as pinching freedom of speech)
In general, the media (in the West) obey rather strict rules regarding reporting.

By the way, the promised Anek

[Dym71]

Quote: atalef

If you (I think you can on - you? Hi)

No problem

Quote: atalef

I don’t touch RT at all, I didn’t lie - of course I did

A very interesting phrase turned out, is not it? Cheerful!

Quote: atalef

If you work in England, work within the local laws and regulations.

Naturally, this is an axiom.

Quote: atalef

hide behind a rag and not shine

it would be right to write pretend to be a rag, forget the Russian little by little? Fix it!

Quote: atalef

I have one question - why didn’t they appeal and do not go to court (if the whole problem is not a lie when submitting materials, but rather a pinching of freedom of speech)

I also have one question - why didn’t they take away the license for a lie when submitting materials, but arrested the accounts? They hit, so to speak, a holy place for any businessman, a wallet!

[unsinkable]

Super-roller. Reasoning is one-sided. Each from its bell tower. The truth, as always, is somewhere in between.

[Monos]

Quote: atalef

Do you know what this is about?
I don’t have the same thing, but the fact (today it is) - there were more than 15 violations and RT did not appeal to the court

What does it have to do with some mythical violations? Bank National Westminster, on its own initiative, blocked the accounts. Doesn't want to talk. Ofcom type not in business. Whom to sue?
Let's not mix flies and cutlets. If you want to prove to us that RT is participating in propaganda wars, then this America has long been open. But blaming lies is an excess and your propaganda. RT just gives a different info and puts emphasis differently.
They simply cannot afford to lie frankly. Miroedy are just waiting for this.
Make friends with logic, do not eat at night.

[Dyagilev]

The report said that Cuadrilla allegedly dumps poisoned garbage off the coast of Africa.

Oh God! I have always said that this is the first step. There, you see, they will start to pass off powdered boys in ketchup for the atrocities of the American coalition! .. But no, here's another source: "Nevertheless, the film of the Russian TV channel provides such evidence that the company itself has not yet been able to refute them."

[stalkerwalker]

Quote: atalef

The Times wrote that before that Ofcom in 15 cases admitted violations of broadcasting rules by RT.

Sasha, and this is an unbiased look from the shores of the Dead Sea?
All "violations" from the media regulator Ofcom consisted in nit-picking about the degree of dosage of liberal truths within the limits as they are understood by the officials of this media regulator, in the coverage of events in Ukraine. And these warnings were issued already in 2014, 2015!
In 2016, Simonyan did not mention this ....

Quote: atalef

it’s just that RT was caught more than once on outright lies.

Margarita Simonyan went through a "harsh school of" lovers of "tolerant truth" in the spring of 2014, when one of the presenters hysterically declared on the air that she did not agree with the policy of Russia and the events in Crimea, and left the studio, thereby violating the employment agreement since did not warn the channel's management either about her tantrums, or about what IT thinks in general ...
The last 2 years in the state of RT - only Aborigines or Europeans. Russians are only correspondents in Russia or Urkain, or other "illiberal" countries.
Summary.
Blocking bank accounts means stopping RT's activities in Britain for an indefinite period. the slogan "All to fight Putin's propaganda!" was announced back in 2015, when RT began to give out materials different from the "non-profitable Western diabetic media" both in Europe, the SGA, and in some awesome middle eastern countries.

[atalef]

Quote: stalkerwalker

Sasha, and this is an unbiased look from the shores of the Dead Sea?

Hi, Ilyich, I'm on the Mediterranean.

Quote: stalkerwalker

All "violations" from the media regulator Ofcom consisted in nit-picking about the degree of dosage of liberal truths within the limits as they are understood by the officials of this media regulator, in the coverage of events in Ukraine. And these warnings were issued already in 2014, 2015!

Actually, I’m on the drum and I have heard little about this conflict, and I’m all the same.
Just one question - were there any violations? There were proceedings going on already with 2014 (as you yourself noted), I don’t know the degree of violation, but only from the words of Simonyan (who is an interested person), the violations continued in 2015, as I understand the proceedings went right up to end of 2016, the result is a decision to close accounts.
The right to appeal and appeal to the court (in England) is almost sacred - why not?
I have one answer - probably the stigma is still in the cannon.

Quote: stalkerwalker

Margarita Simonyan went through a "harsh school of" lovers of "tolerant truth" in the spring of 2014, when one of the presenters hysterically declared on the air that she did not agree with the policy of Russia and the events in Crimea, and left the studio, thereby violating the employment agreement since did not warn the channel's management either about her tantrums or about what IT thinks in general ..

What is it for? We again do not know the truth.
Probably all the same, it is worth recalling the power of propaganda in 2014 and the level of lies (including RT) - or does RT only tell the truth?
Well, someone did not agree and left, explaining how she considered it necessary.

Quote: stalkerwalker

The last 2 years in the state of RT - only Aborigines or Europeans. Russians are only correspondents in Russia or Urkain, or other "illiberal" countries.
Summary

Summary - money is everything

Quote: stalkerwalker

Blocking bank accounts means stopping RT's activities in Britain for an indefinite period. the slogan "All to fight Putin's propaganda!" was announced back in 2015, when RT began to issue materials different from the "non-profitable Western diabetic media" both in Europe, SGA, and in some fucking honest countries of the Middle East.

Let's come together on one thing - RT is still the mouthpiece of the propaganda and its reports (well, very many) - monstrously far from the truth.

[St Petrov]

monstrously far from the truth.

there Assad is not called a tyrant? Are ukronazists called fascists?

or is it true that all Anglo-Saxon media call the coup d'etat - democratic transformations and that the United States can bomb Yemen - and Russia cannot be Syria?

You, too, are telling the truth to us all - it’s probably your own and I’m not specifically about you — I’m about the representatives of your people.

And it would be okay for Syria - well, it is understandably closer to you, maybe you can think closer to the truth - but I also heard about Ukraine here the "truth" from "yours" and realized that I was turning such a truth on my organ

Your "truth" fits exactly into the Anglo-Saxon agenda. How did you put Kiselev here: Coincidence? I don’t think so!

RT is the mouthpiece of the propaganda

Well, this is a shock. just opened their eyes to the world. I immediately remembered the non-worthy SNN and Fox News with aljazira and realized - the Russians were insolent - trying to propagate my point of view on certain circumstances

[St Petrov]

and I also remembered how the family from Georgia was disconnected from live broadcast on SNS on 08.08.08. RT certainly did not include such lawlessness

[stalkerwalker]

Quote: atalef

Let's come together on one thing - RT is still the mouthpiece of the propaganda and its reports (well, very many) - monstrously far from the truth.

Hi Sasha!

I often "ride" past the coast of Britain, so I can say the following:
The topics raised by RT in Britain’s media space are so delicate that Kiselyov just relaxes, smoking aside.
And what kind of crap sometimes the Air Force carries !!!
Both to me and to my strap, both in England and in Ireland, aborigines often turn to questions like "what is happening there in Ukraine?" The question, you must admit, is not idle. And not because Russia Today "stigmatizes" there someone, but because comparing the BBC news channels, Sky News, Al-Jasira and other "local" sources of truth and truth, the British people are trying to get first-hand information, since there are enough Russians among the crews of ships entering the ports of the Tin Islands and Ukrainians ... I will not hide, there are cases when a casual interlocutor, having learned that he is a citizen of Russia, interrupts communication and leaves in English
Larry KingBy the way, without a twinge of conscience, he "sold himself" to the state RT, weekly broadcasts his own point of view to his fellow citizens, using the resources of the "Russian propaganda mouthpiece."
Finally ...
If today we do not conduct broadcast propaganda, there is every chance of being spat upon and cursed. Vaughn, look at the local battles.

[just exp]

tell me about how the BBC SNN and all sorts of fox news wrote that Russia attacked Georgia? But what did the UN investigation write about this too?

[Shadow of darkness]

The article is not about anything. "Freedom of speech" in the understanding of the West is when the West says what it needs, and the rest either listen and discuss what is said to them, or simply assent. Yeltsin's rule very clearly demonstrated this. Whatever is said in the media of other countries, the main thing is that it does not prevent the West from doing its business.

[Blue fox]

Such an impotent move for those who closed the accounts, it turns out that there are no other levers for influence. :) Good work of our lawyers. It seems that the closure of bank accounts may become a certain anti-government propaganda in GB. Imagine if RT will pay for the services of a cleaning company, courier service, garbage company, etc. in cash. Yes, this is not easy to organize at the present time, but it is possible, and an important moment, contributes to the fact that it is more difficult for the tax service to track the amount of taxes that a service provider or hired worker has to pay. And the supplier or the employee opens up scope for gray schemes.

[Stinger]

First, let the UN show a test tube with violations, and then block the sets!

[Wedmak]

English gentlemen are customary to take the word. (Sarcasm). If Putin would have been a little cheater, he would have gotten so SO !!! But no, we will wait for the adequate and most likely asymmetric.

[Banishing liberoids]

Alas, I do not believe that there will be a harsh response on our part — most likely either dull silence or an illegible moo. ..

[Deniosf]

Britons were barbarians as they remained

[Baloo]

Where is the message about the symmetric answer?

[katalonec2014]

You can’t leave without an answer, the answer must be mirrored.

[Banishing liberoids]

By the way, on the issue of birds, democracy cannot be strangled During the discussion of the article on the death of Matorola, new trolls appeared on the site, and two problems affected that removed the minuses and a small number of moderators? Where are they all? Where is Ascetic (Stanislav), where is Armata, where is Esaul? Why did Alexander Romanov suddenly cease to be a moderator - if they removed, then why? Please give an adequate response to the site administration - why were the cons removed, and who ate Romanov? ??

[St Petrov]

State Department is not otherwise

[unsinkable]

He answered, because I agree with you, and so that it can be seen that I agree, and not an impersonal plus.

[Starshina67]

Annoyingly and sadly.

[sounddoc]

They say that a ditty has already appeared among the people, addressed to the small British: "As soon as the BBC is closed, so at least take it ............ !!!!!" In short, guys, you know))))))

[cedar]

Quote: igor1981

If it was supposed that this could happen, then why did they keep the money in English banks ?!

Are you sure that Russian banks are not English? In vain we are sure. All Russian banks are private and English in one way or another. This fact is hidden from most clients, but nevertheless it is a fact. Moreover, the Rothschilds bank on "our" stock exchanges, send their agents to us in the form of consulting companies (the company is a military term), at their behest laws are written and imposed on us, starting with the Constitution and the Production Sharing Law, as well as the notorious " Budgetary rules "and various other laws, of which over 25 years" we "have written and adopted more than 4000, the purpose of which is to suck out Russia, which was occupied after the victory in the" cold "war over the USSR by the brazen Saxons.
RT received a blow in the information-psychological, propaganda, "cold" war, which was unleashed by London long before the birth of RT and Simonyan. Smarter will be.
How the peoples of Russia are robbed, or what is the Budget Rule.
http://артюшенкоолег.рф/index.php/analitika/byudz
hetnoe-pravilo /

[Shuttle]

Quote: Muvka

Took yes closed the BBC. The very first bark.

Bbc?
What does the BBC have to do with it? And in general, what does Britain have to do with it? It is generally laying between Europe and America. Moreover, the gasket with wings.
Close NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox.

[just exp]

just the tool is the states, and the owner of the tool is the naglia.
the truth is that the naglia has a master.

[Volzhanin]

Close tries all SMRAD with any foreign participation. Total and business. This vile trick of the Anglo-Saxon geeks can not be ignored. If still in Russia absolutely all the SMRAD, to which melkonaglia is related, have not been closed, then we really have a country litter, and the authorities are in the service of TNCs.

[Elephant]

It is necessary to close the Russian Air Force and all NPOs. In general, our work must be proactive.

[Galleon]

Quote: elmi

You need to answer to mirror-block all BBC accounts in Russia, otherwise other pro-Western countries, using the example of Britain, will begin to block accounts. And you can, and you need to close all sorts of NGOs in Russia

Correctly. Close accounts not only of the Air Force, but of all pro-English NGOs, and English First at the same time . So that the answer is not mirrored - but mirrored and enlarged. In order to discourage the last.

[Bath]

You sho collapsed from the oak tree and our grandmother honestly stolen in Switzerland England and hid in Panama if in response to grabbing the sacred bit))) that way the cellists do not have enough lard, it’s sparing to save and seriously, while our elite’s money is lying there, you still need to think whose this is the elite

[cedar]

Decision of the court will clearly not be in favor of our channel!
Actually, if in terms of objectivity and impartiality the English court has always been one of the standards in the world.

London began the Cold War against the USSR-Russia back in 1949. Over the past years, he developed a sophisticated methodology of informational and psychological influence on the enemy, now not the USSR, but Russia. Simonyan and RT are considered by London as an instrument of the Kremlin, which must be neutralized, which is done. Court. Peresud ... And who are the judges ?.
The Ten Commandments of Military Propaganda
"... In his book Lies in War, published in 1928, Lord Ponsonby tried
describe the structural elements of the lies and falsifications that he observed during the First
World War. Historian Anne Morelli analyzed in 2004 in her book Principles
military propaganda (precise strikes lead to collateral losses) "the views of the lord
Ponsonby. Another source for Morelli was Georges Demartial 'La mobilization des
consciences. La guerre de 1914 ', published in 1922. Demartial during World War I
War was the secretary of a society that was critical of war. Morelli on
Based on the work of Ponsonby and Demartial, she formulated the ten commandments of military propaganda:
1. We do not want war.
2. Responsibility for the war lies with the enemy camp.
3. The leader (leader) of the enemy is the devil.
4. We fight for a just cause.
5. The enemy is fighting with unauthorized weapons.
6. The enemy commits cruelty intentionally, we - by chance.
7. Our losses are negligible, the losses of the enemy are enormous.
8. Artists and intellectuals are on our side.
9. Our mission is holy.
10. He who doubts the veracity of our messages is a traitor.
Morelli found numerous examples for these principles of propaganda, starting with the Second
World War II before the war in Yugoslavia and Iraq. And today we believe in this lie just as much as
World War I generation. The lies about Kuwaiti babies whom Iraqi soldiers
pulled out of hospital incubators - no different from the lie about the Belgian children, whom the German soldiers allegedly chopped off their hands in the First World War ... "

If not all 10, then any of the 10 commandments of the English Themis can adapt to ban RT.

[padded jacket]

By that time everything had been going on. RT very often showed plots with real events about what is happening in the world who actually support terrorism and, in particular, about the atrocities committed by the occupying Israeli regime in the lands of Palestine annexed by it, naturally to Washington Tel Aviv London, this is not like.
And they just in this way "gagged" RT, so to speak, showed "freedom of speech" in Western democracies.

[afrikanez]

This is where the whole Western "democracy" lies. It's a pity, of course, but I think that RT will cope with this too.

[masiya]

And why did you need to keep babosi in England, that there is not enough of our Sberbank ... so now everything is openwork, you don’t have to sing romances without finances ...

[72jora72]

Quote: Bath

Editor-in-Chief of Russia Today Margarita Simonyan I’m just thinking about a great country whom you just can’t meet hypothetically in it, but in Armenia on any channels there is at least one Russian?

And how do I understand genetically 100% Russian?
P.C. Therefore, our country is great, regardless of the endings in surnames or type of appearance, we are patriots of our country in Russia.

[Mentat]

Quote: atalef

Quote: Wedmak

Just do not take ordinary mistakes for a lie. Western TV channels lie much more epic and something is not visible to them claims from the media regulators

Do you know what this is about?
I am not the same, but the fact (today it is) was more than 15 violations and the RT did not apply to the court.
Why? can anyone explain? Why would it not seem like using the court’s platform, like a tribune denouncing imaginary democracy and suppressing freedom of speech.
But not why? Is there an answer?

There is. Because at the moment it is not profitable to set a precedent.
Do you really think that such actions are not considered carefully? From that side including If there is an obvious miscalculation in pressure on the Republic of Tajikistan or a direct obstacle in the form of a ban on broadcasting, for example, there will immediately be an appeal to the court.

You are trying to create the impression that “RT themselves are to blame” with some naive phrases. It's amazing that you seem to expect some kind of result - in vain, VO readers are mostly educated people with a fairly broad outlook.

[behemot]

cover bibisi and all business. These understand only one language, the language of power - you need a kick in the face to understand.

[Sergey333]

It’s time for the Russian Air Force to close and rain on steam with him.

[Flat5160]

Western version of freedom of speech. Congratulations to the Anglo-Saxons.

[milling machine]

Quote: s-t Petrov

And so Margarita is clever (not, of course, I’m personally not familiar with it and the gamna has surfaced for several years)

Isn't this Margarita writing this tweet a couple of years ago:
Well done, patriot. I immediately determined where the lackeys and where the boyars.
If someone thinks this is a fake, then take the trouble to drive her passage in the Internet - you will be pleasantly surprised.

[Manul]

Quote: frezer

Well done, patriot. I immediately determined where the lackeys and where the boyars.

So what ? It doesn't matter if I am driving or a pedestrian, I will give way to a trolleybus taxiing from a stop, and I will not cross the pedestrian crossing when an ambulance or a fire brigade is driving. But with flashing lights deputies do not go to work figs. This is not envy, but damn normal human justice. If you are a slave, so just break your hat. The blue special signal is intended to save people, and not so that the "chosen ones" arrive on time to "sit down".

[Cat man null]

Quote: Manul

The blue special signal is intended to save people, and not so that the "chosen ones" arrive on time to "sit down"

- sometimes decisions depend on time to "sit down", on which, in turn, lives depend, as on tens of hundreds of thousands of "ambulances" ... not often, but it happens

Quote: Manul

I will succumb to the trolleybus taxiing out of the stop, and I will not cross the crosswalk when an ambulance or fire

- but that's right
- moreover - I will always give way to the minibus-bus. There are many of them inside, but I am alone, and, in general, I'm not particularly in a hurry anywhere.

[Manul]

Quote: frezer

If someone thinks this is a fake, then take the trouble to drive her passage in the Internet - you will be pleasantly surprised.

Vbil. A lot of comments, videos and links are not. You bring "laziness". So it's just stuffing.
People, do not confuse Simonyan and Gayane Chichakyan - our favorite journalist with RT.

[nickgv]

"Humpbacked" sculpt, bastards. It is necessary to introduce mirror measures: to prohibit the broadcasting of Radio Liberty, Echo of Moscow, the Dozhd channel, etc.

[Phosgene]

Block accounts and bank cards of British journalists on the territory of the Russian Federation ... This rudeness cannot be indulged and left unanswered ...

[Komrad.Garik]

Ordinary people, if they want, will find where to read the truthful news.

[Mentat]

Quote: teo28

And here is how things really are

What the bank actually said
A letter from the bank has been published on the RT website. In it, the bank informs RT that it has revised the services it provides to the company and will no longer be able to provide them. The bank recommends that RT seek an alternative outside The Royal Bank of Scotland.
Natwest warns that the bank will cease to provide card services in a month, that is, from November 14, 2016.
The provision of other banking services Natwest intends to cease from December 12 this year. The bank also clarifies that if by this time RT cannot find an alternative, then the companies will return the money left on the balance sheet in the form of a check.

http://www.bbc.com/russian/news-37677333
Simonyan - such a Simonyan

And what is the revelation and universal truth?

About £ 2,3 million is in Russia Today’s account with National Westminster Bank in the UK, a TV channel spokesman told Vedomosti. It is this account that may be closed in the near future, the editor-in-chief of Russia Today Margarita Simonyan said earlier.

Colleagues, specify the info, plz: accounts are not blocked, but are closed. You can still take the money. Panic in the ranks is not observed.

Banks refuse to service, which is actually illegal.

[Dali]

Quote: atalef

The Times wrote that before that Ofcom in 15 cases admitted violations of broadcasting rules by RT.

And where are your brothers, gr. Atalef ?!
The rest realized that there was nothing to "catch" ... - and you?!

Yes, but can you specifically list all these "violations", preferably with dates, and where can you read about them?

PS ...
Give information to the studio!
Give information to the studio!
Give information to the studio!
From "first" hands and "hands" !!!

[Michael easily]

Degenerative tentacles of Russophobia are, of course, pathology. The therapy seems to be late - and ... preventive intervention

[GTYCBJYTH2021]

Why did they keep their accounts in England, huh? It’s not fashionable to keep them in Russia, apparently ......

[Mentat]

Quote: GTYCBJYTH2021

Why did they keep their accounts in England, huh? It’s not fashionable to keep them in Russia, apparently ......

And think before writing? They receive money on the spot money for advertising, pay rent, etc.