Military Review

South Korean president offered to return to the country tactical nuclear weapons

41
The Presidential Council for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea (NUAC) in its report proposed to the leader of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Park Geun-hye, to return to the territory of the country a tactical nuclear weapon The United States, however, the president is confident: there should be no nuclear weapons on the peninsula, reports Kommersant.


South Korean president offered to return to the country tactical nuclear weapons


"The deployment of US tactical nuclear weapons in the country and the permanent deployment of US strategic forces can serve as an instrument of pressure not only on North Korea, but also on China in order to comply with sanctions against Pyongyang," the report says.

Recall that in 1991, the Americans completely removed tactical nuclear weapons from South Korea. True, in 2012, the US Congress supported the idea of ​​his return in order to protect against the North Korean threat. However, Seoul did not support these plans, since it contradicts the declaration of the North and South declaration on the denuclearization of the peninsula adopted in 1992.

In December of this year, the head of the ruling party’s parliamentary faction, Won Yu Chol, declared the need for South Korea to have its own nuclear potential.

However, Park Geun-hye reaffirmed her commitment to keeping the peninsula free of nuclear weapons.

According to The Korea Times, "in September, President Park and the leader of the United States, Barack Obama, determined that there was no need to reintroduce nuclear weapons on the peninsula."

At the same time, Park Geun-hye recently criticized opponents of the deployment of the American THAAD missile defense system in Kazakhstan, stressing that "the country faced a serious security crisis against the background of the nuclear and missile programs of the DPRK."

Vice President of the Institute of Political Studies Asan (RK) Choi Kan: “Seoul always stresses that it does not need to create its own nuclear weapons, if the United States guarantees an expanded deterrence (DPRK) in a more concrete and practical way. But in the opposite case, Seoul will inevitably fall into a position when it has to start making its own weapons. ”
Photos used:
to Reuters
41 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. KAPITANUS
    KAPITANUS 14 October 2016 09: 38
    0
    The guards are fashionable.
    1. GSH-18
      GSH-18 14 October 2016 10: 07
      0
      South Korean president offered to return to the country tactical nuclear weapons

      And throw it on the UK and SeShePe
      1. Conductor
        Conductor 15 October 2016 12: 06
        0
        In connection with the regular promises of one smart guy to wipe South Korea "into nuclear ashes", the return of Ya is not a bad step. Kim finished badly - now the Korean neighbors live more and more tensely
    2. GSH-18
      GSH-18 14 October 2016 10: 39
      0
      South Korean president offered to return to the country tactical nuclear weapons

      Matches for children is not a toy !!!
    3. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 14 October 2016 13: 55
      +4
      The guards are fashionable.

  2. Barakuda
    Barakuda 14 October 2016 09: 43
    +1
    Finish out ..
    Just have not decided yet who will kiss the ass - Trump or Clinton.
    But with China and North Korea, the jokes are bad.
    1. katalonec2014
      katalonec2014 14 October 2016 09: 51
      +2
      Quote: Barracuda
      Finish out.

      So this and that, they would have to decide among themselves, without intermediaries and "guarantors", but they only pressurize. Well, they will keep the nuclear weapons there, so what? will only escalate the situation even more.
      1. DMB_95
        DMB_95 14 October 2016 10: 41
        +1
        TNW in South Korea makes sense only against China and Russia. A nuclear conflict between North and South is death to both countries. Even if the North (theoretically) simply secretly pull up their nuclear weapons to the border with the South and in a situation of "nothing more to lose" activate it on their territory, both Koreas will die. And a striped military base. It will also fly to us and China. Then why does the South need nuclear weapons? Only Peed needs it ... The Pentagon.
  3. gray smeet
    gray smeet 14 October 2016 09: 47
    +3
    Quote:
    “Recall that in 1991, the Americans completely removed tactical nuclear weapons from South Korea. True, in 2012, the US Congress supported the idea of ​​its return in order to protect against the North Korean threat. However, Seoul did not support these plans, since it contradicts the declaration of the North and the South on the denuclearization of the peninsula adopted in 1992."

    Questions for Ynovtsy:
    And where are the plans for the destruction of the DPRK in 2012? And why did you get it in 1991?


    Quote:
    "In December this year, the head of the parliamentary faction from the ruling party, Won Yoo Chol, announced the need for South Korea to have its own nuclear potential.

    However Pak Geun Hye reaffirmed its commitment to keep the peninsula free of nuclear weapons."

    And why does President Southerners not want nuclear weapons? AND? (would arrange a new "Pakistan-India")
    1. gray smeet
      gray smeet 14 October 2016 09: 51
      +3
      And already the following quote simply baffles Ynovtsev:

      According to The Korea Times, "in September, President Park and US leader Barack Obama determined that there was no need to reintroduce nuclear weapons on the peninsula».

      But the guys directly say:

      At the same time, Pak Geun Hye recently criticized opponents of the deployment of the American THAAD missile defense system in Kazakhstan, emphasizing that "the country is facing a serious security crisis against the backdrop of North Korea's nuclear and missile programs."
      1. 0255
        0255 14 October 2016 10: 10
        +2
        Quote: gray smeet
        And already the following quote simply baffles Ynovtsev:

        Will not deliver. Right now the bloodsucker, quilted jacket, 34 region, Uncle Murzik will justify us that Kim is good, and whoever does not love him are those liberals laughing laughing
        1. Uncle Murzik
          Uncle Murzik 15 October 2016 10: 00
          0
          to begin with, let's justify about the last "dictator" of Europe, Lukoshenko! lol
      2. 34 region
        34 region 14 October 2016 10: 28
        0
        09.51. Obama determined there is no need to introduce nuclear weapons on the peninsula! And what is the hand in the Nazi salutation in the photo? Maybe that's why there is no need? After all, wars can also be waged with light weapons. The main ideology to push through. Here the Soviet Union collapsed perfectly and without nuclear bombing. Iraq too. Syria is not being bombed by nuclear mines. The outskirts quite successfully utilizes its population with both small arms and artillery weapons. Why bomb them with nuclear mines if the same tasks are solved by cheap small arms and without radiation contamination? And here also Russia and China seem to have joined the sanctions against the DPRK. But in the event of a war of the north and south, what will the United States do? They will drive their entire fleet to their shores or say: This is your kindred showdown. Solve them yourself, and we will throw you weapons for disposal. Will they bring in their troops and strongly support the southerners? And what are they Afghans and Iraqis do not support against terrorists? Maybe because the United States benefits from war? US war is not profitable? And why do they constantly untie them?
        1. gray smeet
          gray smeet 14 October 2016 10: 34
          +1
          The text is long, but what about? About what is the USA? So we already know ... WE KNOW THAT THE USA !!!! (sorry for the capslog)

          Quote: 34 region
          And what is the hand in the Nazi salutation in the photo? Maybe that's why there is no need?

          Well, this is generally stupid (excuse me)!


          1. 34 region
            34 region 14 October 2016 10: 44
            0
            10.34 What will the Yunovtsy say? Have the Yunovtsi been baffled?
            1. gray smeet
              gray smeet 14 October 2016 10: 49
              0
              Speak articulately!
          2. 34 region
            34 region 14 October 2016 10: 46
            0
            10.34. Well, Putin’s gesture doesn’t look like hello from the heart to the sun!
            1. gray smeet
              gray smeet 14 October 2016 10: 51
              0
              Quote: 34 region
              10.34. Well, Putin’s gesture doesn’t look like hello from the heart to the sun!



              wassat
            2. gray smeet
              gray smeet 14 October 2016 11: 10
              0
              Quote: 34 region
              10.34. Well, Putin’s gesture doesn’t look like hello from the heart to the sun!


              And then there was a break in the template! wassat

      3. Normal ok
        Normal ok 14 October 2016 10: 59
        +3
        Quote: gray smeet
        And already the following quote simply baffles Ynovtsev:

        In principle, it is impossible to confuse Ynovtsev. The concept of "logic" is a phenomenon alien to them, imposed by the secret imperialist behind the scenes laughing laughing
    2. katalonec2014
      katalonec2014 14 October 2016 09: 58
      +1
      Quote: gray smeet
      (would arrange a new "Pakistan-India")

      They will erase each other from the face of the earth, and they will carry all the radiation to us. I’ll somehow trample without a Korean gadget, but without hair on my head ...
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 14 October 2016 10: 08
        +3
        Quote: katalonec2014
        Quote: gray smeet
        (would arrange a new "Pakistan-India")

        They will erase each other from the face of the earth, and will carry all the radiation to us.I'm without a Korean gadgetbut without hair on his head ...


        Wow! What I’m talking about .... This is where the interests of Russia are manifested! And not in blindly assenting to Eunu!
      2. 0255
        0255 14 October 2016 10: 15
        +3
        Quote: katalonec2014
        They will erase each other from the face of the earth, and they will carry all the radiation to us. I’ll somehow trample without a Korean gadget, but without hair on my head ...

        Now fans of Kim and you will be registered as liberals, how is it - your hair on your head is dearer than the "great sun-faced" Eun? laughing Local Jucheists are not against the radioactive contamination of the Far East (at least until this happens), if only Kim launched a rocket at someone fool
        1. katalonec2014
          katalonec2014 14 October 2016 10: 23
          +2
          Quote: 0255
          if only Kim launched a rocket at someone

          I’m guessing that after this the potato will slip through a sieve, al not to fit into a bucket, it’s such radiation.
          1. shuhartred
            shuhartred 14 October 2016 10: 39
            +3
            Quote: katalonec2014
            Quote: 0255
            if only Kim launched a rocket at someone

            I’m guessing that after this the potato will slip through a sieve, al not to fit into a bucket, it’s such radiation.

            This is half the trouble, but if she starts chasing gardeners, then what request ? Ile cockroaches with a dog sized wassat
            1. 0255
              0255 14 October 2016 10: 51
              +2
              Quote: shuhartred
              This is half the trouble, but if she starts chasing gardeners, then what request ? Ile cockroaches with a dog sized wassat

              Then even Kim’s fans will howl, they will hate him wassat But it will be too late
    3. 34 region
      34 region 14 October 2016 10: 12
      +2
      09.47. Well, in the 90s, Russia also reduced its nuclear potential. And why in Europe there are stockpiles of nuclear weapons, in Turkey, Israel? We will not consider India and Pakistan.
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 14 October 2016 10: 20
        +1
        Formulate a question ... What do you want to say? unclear.. hi
        1. 34 region
          34 region 14 October 2016 10: 40
          +2
          10.20. Why not understand? Then it was necessary to make the face of the peacekeepers. So they did it. The other side of the issue. If the United States is for peace, then what the hell is Europe in nuclear hostages? Who then is inadequate? Then another question. If we were under a nuclear treaty under Putin, why did Russia become accused of aggression? Our Putin, they said, is also inadequate and very aggressive! Why then were sanctions imposed on us if we complied with international treaties? Because of the Crimea? Georgia? Maybe something else here? Do you have a brainwashing for the public? But Russia is not blamed for this? Why are Eun and Putin aggressive, but only the adequate and sane have random shelling and bombing? How can this be? And who destroyed the civilian population with cities? Russia, DPRK, USA?
          1. gray smeet
            gray smeet 14 October 2016 10: 57
            +1
            Quote: 34 region
            .... The other side of the issue. If the United States is for peace, then what the hell is Europe in nuclear hostages? ......


            So you did not answer why the South Caucasus (with US support) in 2012 (as well as in 1996-1998) did not attack the DPRK? At that time there were no nuclear weapons, there were no missiles ... Why, Karl? wassat Give me an answer, Carl? Do not go away from the answer ... Maybe because no one needs her, so that she would also be attacked? laughing
            And since no one needs anyone, you need to play around with nuclear tests - so Eun probably thought?
            1. 34 region
              34 region 14 October 2016 11: 24
              +1
              10.57. If North Korea does not need anyone, then there is no need to impose sanctions against it. Why then did you impose sanctions? To send them humanitarian aid? Or maybe it's like in experiments? What will happen to the country under sanctions, and humanitarian aid is like viewing the results of experiments. How are they doing? Why not attacked? At one time, they got a good tooth and the tactics changed. Why climb under attack yourself if you can hire from the side. In the 90s, what was inherited from the USSR was digested; in the 2000s, the issue of energy carriers (oil) was solved. Development requires cheap energy and resources. With cheap oil, the issue is almost resolved. Next in line are other fossils. True, if the world's population is slightly reduced, then resources will need less. And also to the question of the attack. Nobody invaded the outskirts, but the economy is collapsing! They seem to help Afghanistan and Iraq, but they are not developing technologically.
              1. Uncle Murzik
                Uncle Murzik 15 October 2016 10: 03
                0
                34 region a decent response to liberals like gray smeet! soldier
  4. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 14 October 2016 09: 50
    0
    They do not understand with their stupid pumpkins that a retaliatory strike will be delivered primarily in the countries from where the launch was made.
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 14 October 2016 09: 50
    +1
    And do they (streak-eared) say that Russia is a bully with a nuclear club?
  6. Hunt
    Hunt 14 October 2016 09: 51
    +3
    If returned, this is not only a provocation of China but also of Russia! A very complex region, historically, Asians hate each other fiercely, Koreans - Japanese, Japanese - Chinese, etc., this step will certainly not add calm, and all this is on our borders! And in general, in vain they are provoking Una, this guy can certainly plummet!
  7. Lieutenant Teterin
    Lieutenant Teterin 14 October 2016 09: 51
    +8
    In light of North Korea's demonstrative rattling of nuclear weapons, it is easy to understand those who, in South Korea, want to be protected at least by American TNW. By doing so, they hope to cool the ardor of Kim Jong-un, but they do not take into account the style of thinking of the northerners. The fanatics there, against the background of news about the supply of nuclear weapons, can start a war, deciding that "the imperialists want to attack us."
    1. Uncle Murzik
      Uncle Murzik 14 October 2016 10: 01
      +4
      and the imperialists do not want belay
      1. Lieutenant Teterin
        Lieutenant Teterin 15 October 2016 14: 52
        +4
        The fact of the matter is that if they wanted to, they would have been saddled for a long time. For example, in the mid-90s, because that decade was a time of almost complete US hegemony.
  8. tinibar
    tinibar 14 October 2016 10: 06
    +2
    Quote: Barracuda
    Finish out ..
    Just have not decided yet who will kiss the ass - Trump or Clinton.
    But with China and North Korea, the jokes are bad.

    And that is not their concern. Whose they substitute, they will be.
  9. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 14 October 2016 10: 06
    +3
    return US tactical nuclear weapons to the country

    Unlike the Japanese, these did not experience all the "charms" of the military atom. The sense of self-preservation is completely absent from those who offer it. And the United States will gladly seize on such an offer.
  10. Pirate
    Pirate 14 October 2016 11: 44
    +3
    The South does not understand that the fuss with missiles in the North is precisely because of the constant training of the United States at the borders and the deployment of their bases on foreign territory. It recalls the deployment of the US military contingent in eastern Europe, to which a mandatory response from Russia follows, and the subsequent cries of Europeans about the threat that Russia will again strengthen its troops (on its own land) ...
  11. Moor
    Moor 14 October 2016 12: 45
    +6
    Somewhere I already heard it ... recourse
  12. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 14 October 2016 13: 39
    0
    NPT, therefore, in the toilet. am

    Soon, China will become Russia No. 2:

    1. TNW near its territory.
    2. ABM near its territory.
    3. The territorial dispute over the islands, resolved in the best Anglo-Saxon traditions - by rotten ships.
    4. Lack of democracy. laughing

    A great gift for the future president of the United States, with an Asian twist. Soon, very soon it will be discovered that wherever the United States turns, they turn their backs on someone and they are sodomized. laughing
  13. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 14 October 2016 13: 53
    +3
    The Presidential Council for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea (NUAC) in its report invited the leader of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Park Geun-hye, to return tactical nuclear weapons to the country

    This is their "peaceful reunion".