Military Review

Why does Russia need a naval base in Syria

38
Why does Russia need a naval base in Syria



On October 10, it became known about Russia's plans to establish a naval base on a permanent basis in the Syrian Mediterranean port of Tartus. fleet (Navy) of Russia. This was announced by State Secretary - Deputy Minister of Defense Nikolai Pankov. He specified that the relevant documents have already been prepared and are undergoing interagency coordination procedures.

The base will be created on the basis of the 720-th point of logistics (PMTC) of the Russian Navy, created in 1971 year. Tartus is located in 160 km north-west of Damascus, PBTR occupies the northern part of the port.

The military base in the Syrian Tartus will be the first for the fleet outside Russia.

Seriously and for a long time

According to Franz Klintsevich, First Deputy Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security, the intention to locate a naval base in Tartus on a permanent basis confirms that Russia has come to the Middle East "seriously and for a long time."

"This is a decision of a strategic order, indicating that Russia is aware of its interests and is ready to defend them. Ultimately, it is about stabilizing the situation in Syria and in the Middle East as a whole, thereby depriving terrorism of the nutrient medium"
Franz Klintsevich
First Deputy Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security


This opinion is shared by TASS military observer Viktor Litovkin.

The base is necessary not only for replenishment of reserves of fuel, fuels and lubricants, fresh water, minor repairs of power and other ship systems, short-term rest of crews, but also for long-term parking. Replenishment of ammunition and other materiel, for the organization of coordination of ship interactions, for the solution of other combat missions. Including for planning joint actions with aviationstationed at the air base in Hmeimim
Viktor Litovkin
TASS military commentator


The expert stresses that this base will need to be protected both from the air, from the sea, and on land. This will require a certain amount of military equipment and personnel. It is impossible to organize all this at the logistics point.

Creating a naval base in Tartus allows you to comprehensively solve the problem of Russia's military presence in the region.

Together the bases in Hamme and Tartus will constitute a serious military force - air and sea supremacy, no one can ignore.
Franz Klintsevich


In the autumn of 2015, the Russian side carried out dredging and expansion of the mooring front of the 720-1 PMTO in Tartus.
October 4 2016, the official representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Igor Konashenkov told reporters that "the naval base in Tartus" and coastal ships of the Mediterranean squadron will cover the C-300 anti-aircraft missile system delivered from the air.

Control and deterrence

The need for the emergence of a full-fledged base on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean, in the opinion of Litovkin, will first of all make it possible to control this water area. The United States is holding the 5 fleet there.

The ships of this connection with the Aegis ABM systems and Tomahawk long-range cruise missiles regularly enter the Black Sea, take aim at our bases and parts of the Strategic Missile Forces in the European part of the country. To restrain them in the Mediterranean is much more logical than on the Russian coast.
Viktor Litovkin



Another task of the military base is the fight against terrorists in the Middle East. It is more convenient to do this from the Mediterranean than from Russian bases. The expert also notes that we should not forget about the pirates in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. To them from Tartus is much closer than from Sevastopol or Vladivostok.

Status upgrade

Opening a base in Tartus will improve the status of the Russian military in the region and the quality of combat missions. The legal decision on the military base will allow creating in Tartus all the necessary conditions for the performance of combat missions by the Russian military contingent, according to Klintsevich.

With this base, we can safely fulfill those contractual obligations that we have. People who serve will be socially protected. They understand that they are under the protection of the law, and their combat mission will be performed with a different quality.
Franz Klintsevich



He also noted that, if necessary, Russia would be able to send "any number of personnel" there, taking into account the combat missions being carried out. In addition, the senator believes that the legal status of the base will be defended by the military there "within the framework of existing international law."

It will be very difficult for someone to press this right shamelessly or ignore it, as is often the case today in interethnic conflicts.
Franz Klintsevich
Originator:
http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/3695563
38 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. izya top
    izya top 13 October 2016 06: 08
    +5
    Why does Russia need a naval base in Syria
    sho would bulo feel
    1. populist
      populist 13 October 2016 06: 18
      +2
      Still need to open a base in Antarctica!
      What if penguins start up among penguins? wassat
    2. Rozmyssel
      Rozmyssel 13 October 2016 09: 13
      +1
      strategic gas pipelines from Qatar and Iran to Syria, of course, should remain under our control, and not Amer or Jewish.
      1. megavolt823
        megavolt823 13 October 2016 10: 59
        +1
        removal base, as well as a base close to a likely partner. it's 1 on 1 as much as possible, but a friend in the bushes will not hurt. reasoning on how much the base is immoral . it's like a question about the price of your life. maybe she is not dear to you? in a world where power rules, and so it was always talk how much is not appropriate. the consequence is expensive. hi
        1. OLD FART
          OLD FART 13 October 2016 18: 27
          0
          Quote: iza top
          Why does Russia need a naval base in Syria
          sho would bulo feel

          Well, all climbed out right away ..... There will be a base and powerful, to spite you all! It will already be dangerous to piracy in the sky ... We will teach you, respect other countries!
  2. gorunov
    gorunov 13 October 2016 06: 16
    +4
    And how much is this pleasure?
    1. izya top
      izya top 13 October 2016 06: 19
      +4
      Quote: gorunov
      And how much is this pleasure?

      1. Mahmut
        Mahmut 13 October 2016 06: 55
        +9
        And how much is this pleasure?

        Much cheaper than not having it.
        1. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 13 October 2016 08: 42
          +3
          Quote: Mahmut
          Much cheaper than not having it.

          Moreover, Syria sticks out to us several billion greens. You can generally raise the question of perpetual and gratuitous rents, like Guantanamo.
          In general, I am surprised by the closure of the bases in Lourdas and Cam Ranh with the wording "too expensive rent". And at the same time, multibillion-dollar debts to Vietnam and Cuba are being written off. hi
    2. dmi.pris1
      dmi.pris1 13 October 2016 06: 49
      +2
      And how much does the opportunity for a peaceful life cost for us, the citizens of Russia? How can it be measured, counted ... And not only in Syria, but also in Vietnam and Cuba, possibly in Egypt.
      1. Reptiloid
        Reptiloid 13 October 2016 07: 10
        +1
        It is a necessity, not a pleasure!
        1. megavolt823
          megavolt823 13 October 2016 11: 10
          0
          Reptiloid is fully supportive. you just need to sell nuclear potential competently. like in NATO a collective theme. Vietnam is not the best location. Venezuela is a more interesting undertaking. how to place in Turkey and let them think. hi
        2. Reserve officer
          Reserve officer 13 October 2016 14: 15
          +2
          "This is a decision of a strategic order, indicating that Russia is aware of its interests and is ready to defend them. Ultimately, it is about stabilizing the situation in Syria and in the Middle East as a whole, thereby depriving terrorism of the nutrient medium"

          Comprehensive explanation. What other questions may be?
  3. ImPerts
    ImPerts 13 October 2016 06: 20
    +3
    The base is needed for projecting forces into nearby territories. Exactly for the same. for which our sworn partners do this all over the world.
    1. Mahmut
      Mahmut 13 October 2016 07: 01
      +3
      The base, that of vegetables, that of the military, is a purely logistic object. There is no projection of force or immediate threat there. This would be to transfer the military to the desired point without trunks. And so that warships everywhere do not carry a barge with them.
      1. ImPerts
        ImPerts 13 October 2016 08: 19
        0
        Well, if not, then no. What then is everyone outraged?
  4. Rosiyanin
    Rosiyanin 13 October 2016 06: 28
    +1
    And we’ll open a resort there and we will fly there and relax peacefully. And why then Turkey and Egypt?
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 13 October 2016 06: 37
      0
      Quote: Rosiyanin
      And we’ll open a resort there and we will fly there and relax peacefully. And why then Turkey and Egypt?

      and what doesn’t rest at home?
      1. Rosiyanin
        Rosiyanin 13 October 2016 06: 51
        +2
        Someone can relax at home, someone who likes on the shores of the warm sea can fly. Moreover, it will be yours, safe rest))))
      2. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 13 October 2016 08: 48
        +3
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        and what doesn’t rest at home?

        And I would drive one more time to Sharm El Sheikh ..... feel Service of course is rather weak in comparison with Turkey, but the sea ..... good And ours (owners of hotels and hotels) think more about short-term benefits, and not about long-term prospects. Therefore, the service is more expensive and lame.
        But I will not go to Turkey in principle anymore, even if the GDP with Erdogan is even kissed on the gums. Personally, I'm not going to forgive them anything. hi
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 13 October 2016 07: 11
    +3
    Together the bases in Hamme and Tartus will constitute a serious military force - air and sea supremacy, no one can ignore.

    Therefore, a howl is already rising and not only in the west. Russian "handshakes" have already yelled about why we need bases in a "torn to shreds" economy. Once again, they remembered and took care of Russian pensioners and science. And of course another howl about the militarization of the country. Oh, this fifth column, which feels too at ease undermining national interests.
  6. Old26
    Old26 13 October 2016 08: 37
    +3
    Base in Tartous? How enchanting. Have all these deputies talking about this "base in Tartus" at least looked at the map? Where to open a base there, especially a full-fledged naval base? Well, the citation of the analyst Litovkin is generally black out. One of his words
    The need for the emergence of a full-fledged base on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean, in the opinion of Litovkin, will first of all make it possible to control this water area. The United States is holding the 5 fleet there.
    talks about the level of knowledge of this analyst. At least Wikipedia would look at the area of ​​responsibility of the American fleets, if he himself does not know
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 13 October 2016 08: 50
      0
      Quote: Old26
      And all these deputies talking about this "base in Tartus

      Judging by the outrage, you have your own opinion. Can be more? hi
    2. Professor
      Professor 13 October 2016 09: 38
      +4
      Quote: Old26
      talks about the level of knowledge of this analyst. At least Wikipedia would look at the area of ​​responsibility of the American fleets, if he himself does not know

      Well, he mixed up the 6th and 5th fleets. It happens to everyone? wink

      I personally like:
      Together, the bases in Khmeimim and Tartus will constitute a serious military force - supremacy in the air and at sea, which no one can ignore.
      It turns out everything is very simple. They placed a couple of steamboats and a dozen aircraft and dominance in the air and at sea is ensured.

      By the way, what will happen to the base when Assad is put on a stake? The contract is indefinite, i.e. at any time, the new "legitimate" ruler can point the door.
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 13 October 2016 15: 01
        +1
        Quote: professor
        The contract is indefinite, i.e. at any time, the new "legitimate" ruler can point the door.

        And what, the Cubans did not show pendos on the door? belay
        And also what does it mean
        Quote: professor
        when Assad put on a stake?
        Maybe all the same IF?
      2. Stiletto_711
        Stiletto_711 13 October 2016 17: 16
        +1
        By the way, what will happen to the base when Assad is put on a stake?

        Ah professor, there are so many anxieties in life! What happens when Assad dies? What happens when the Arabs hammer on the NNRC in Dimona? What will happen if the old woman Hillary, having become president, begins Armagedon because of insanity?
        If you think about every hypothetical question, you can bring yourself to nervous exhaustion sad . Do not worry! Everything will be fine! wink
  7. sa-ag
    sa-ag 13 October 2016 08: 41
    +4
    In my opinion, a flag demonstration, no more, it’s not the USSR, where the number of ships was enough for the Mediterranean squadron and for the rest of the fleets, the Ministry of Finance recently announced that the resources of the Reserve Fund could be exhausted in 2017, then they will use the funds of the National Welfare Fund and the base is an additional item of expenditures and the security of civilians in the Russian Federation will not be affected in any way because it is useless to fight international terrorism in a single country, because it is scattered across different countries, it is necessary to have remote theater of operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya plus overlapping financial streams ...
  8. Old26
    Old26 13 October 2016 09: 03
    0
    Quote: Ingvar 72
    Judging by the outrage, you have your own opinion. Can be more?

    You can, but a little later. There will be free time around 12.30 - I will unsubscribe. True from the phone, but I'll try
  9. ImPerts
    ImPerts 13 October 2016 10: 07
    0
    In the desire to open a base, I am only interested in the question - price. If for a nominal fee - one, for a specific amount another. But in any case, it must be considered.
    Consider the base as a kind of logistic point? Tell this to the specialists from the General Staff, who have always tensed and are straining because of the "vegetable storage bases" near the borders of Russia.
    Any base is a place for the deployment of military contingents, which can silence a lot of conflicts and disputes. If Iskanders are deployed in Syria, many will feel uneasy. What if RTOs enter Tartus and fire a salvo of SLCMs?
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 13 October 2016 13: 09
      +1
      Quote: ImPerts
      Should MRCs enter Tartus and launch an SLCM volley?

      Well, it seems like launches of SLCMs from the Mediterranean Sea through the territory of Syria were made, as nothing special happened
  10. Donhapa
    Donhapa 13 October 2016 11: 48
    0
    "Why do we need a base in Syria ..."
    Yes Schaub Bulo ...
    And if this option does not suit, then the Armenian version: how to grill "Extra horseradish in the basement, the backside does not press" why stuck ...
  11. dep071
    dep071 13 October 2016 14: 08
    0
    Quote: sa-ag
    In my opinion, a flag demonstration, no more, it’s not the USSR, where the number of ships was enough for the Mediterranean squadron and for the rest of the fleets, the Ministry of Finance recently announced that the resources of the Reserve Fund could be exhausted in 2017, then they will use the funds of the National Welfare Fund and the base is an additional item of expenditures and the security of civilians in the Russian Federation will not be affected in any way because it is useless to fight international terrorism in a single country, because it is scattered across different countries, it is necessary to have remote theater of operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya plus overlapping financial streams ...

    Very well said. I can add that the base appeared there before they talk about it, it's not the first time we are in Syria, I suppose so. Plus, hydrocarbon reserves. We are working according to the United States scheme: why should we swing at our place, it’s better to send an aircraft carrier and we will swing in Kuwait. Fight with bearded, parallel work.
  12. TOR2
    TOR2 13 October 2016 15: 10
    +2
    Quote: sa-ag
    In my opinion, a flag demonstration, no more
    More, and much more. Nearby is one of the world's oil and gas faucets. In the case of a big mess, this faucet closes well or breaks down bringing down commodity markets and making war very expensive. So this base will be like a bone across the throats of NATO.
    1. OLD FART
      OLD FART 13 October 2016 18: 33
      0
      Quote: TOR2
      Quote: sa-ag
      In my opinion, a flag demonstration, no more
      More, and much more. Nearby is one of the world's oil and gas faucets. In the case of a big mess, this faucet closes well or breaks down bringing down commodity markets and making war very expensive. So this base will be like a bone across the throats of NATO.

      And there Israel is nearby ....! And they have lobby there in all countries, especially in the USA ...
      Here's how they will ..? He took off, lit up, made a circle above the airfield and again landing and happiness that he was alive! laughing
  13. Old26
    Old26 13 October 2016 20: 01
    +5
    Quote: Ingvar 72
    Judging by the outrage, you have your own opinion. Can be more?

    I beg your pardon, Igor, but we failed to unsubscribe during the day. So, the answer is whether I have my own opinion on the "base" in Tartus.

    Yes I have. Many who write laudatory reviews about this so-called base are simply too lazy to enter some cartographic resource to see what this "base" is.

    And she is the following. The port of Tartus is approximately 2 by 1,5 km. Our MTO point covers an area of ​​approximately 800 by 170 meters.

    Entrance to PMTO is approximately the following. Port entrance gate. After about 130-150 meters, the craft should do left turn approximately 230-260 degrees. Not 30-60, but 230-260 degrees. After about 350 meters - the entrance to the PMTO.
    Entrance Width Approx 300 meters. After 300 meters, it decreases to about 170 meters.

    The southern part is occupied by the piers on which the ships of the Syrian Navy are based. Depart from the north pier to the south two floating berths about 120 meters long. There are no other berths. What can be moored on them - see for yourself. The distance between the berths is approximately 120-150 meters. The width of the passage remains about 70 meters.
    After the second floating berth, after about 250 meters, there is a berth wall about 130 meters long, located perpendicular to the southern berth. The ships of the Syrian Navy are based on it. And only then the "mirror" of the water area 400-450 meters long.

    And where on this meager territory can be placed, as they write with us "full-fledged naval base". Now a pair of workshops can really be based there. With us, those who wish are going to place a fleet in this place.

    Let's see what are the lengths of the ships that the cheers are going to place there. Let me remind you. The width of the water area is about 170 meters. And lengths:
    - frigates of the project 11356 - 125 meters (it will become to the floating boat)
    - Project 22350 frigate - 135 meters (15 meters out of the pier, leaving a passage of 35 meters (maximum, if you do not take into account the presence of Syrian ships).
    - Project 1155 BOD - 163 meters (passage 7 meters to the south pier)
    - BOD project 61 - 144 meters
    - EM project 956 - 156,5 meters (passage 13 meters)
    - Project 1164 cruiser - 186 meters (comments are unnecessary with a base width of 170 meters)
    - ANK project 11436 ("Kuznetsov") - 306 meters (no comment)
    - Project 1144 TAKR - 250 meters
    - "Mistral" about which they say that the Egyptians are already jumping out of their pants, wanting to sell them to us for a symbolic amount of $ 1 - 199 meters

    And after that broadcasting about the full naval base of Tartus can be called adequate people? There is nowhere to expand it. To the north of the port city buildings, on land outside the 200 meter zone of the "base" too. To the south is the port. And where is the place for a full-fledged ????

    The history of the failed naval base is as follows. it was to be built in the Latakia region; up to 20 warships of any classes, including cruisers and ANC, were to be placed in it. Have in its composition an air base with almost a division of bombers and scouts, And then they want on a patch of .... There are a lot of hoteliers, of course. Other realities
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 14 October 2016 15: 26
      0
      A base in Syria is necessary not only to support our friends in the Syrian Hezbollah region of Iraq Iran, but also to monitor our opponents to the United States by NATO countries and the Israeli regime.
  14. Old26
    Old26 16 October 2016 10: 48
    0
    Quote: quilted jacket
    Entrance to PMTO is approximately the following. Port entrance gate. After about 130-150 meters, the boat should make a left turn of about 230-260 degrees. Not 30-60, but 230-260 degrees

    Sorry. Just noticed a slip. Of course, the turn is not at 230-260 degrees, but at 130-160
  15. Alizi
    Alizi 25 May 2018 05: 59
    0
    No matter how you build hemorrhoids, instead of a naval base, given the impotent protection of our Syrian ally ...