IMF scares capitalists with world problems, and Trotskyists call for revolution

29
The “Report on Global Financial Stability” for October 2016 of the International Monetary Fund demonstrates the financiers' concern about the instability of the global financial system and problems in both the economies of developed countries and those that continue to build a market economy. The threats are the growth of debts, the precariousness of the pension systems, the weakness of the banking sector, and political instability.





Nick Beams (Nick Beams) on World Socialist Web Site spoke about the "existential crisis." At the International Monetary Fund, they experience “serious” problems: at the next meeting of the Fund, financiers noted the growing protectionism in the world economy and the growth of hostility around the world to the economic and political world order that until now was considered “dominant” on the planet.

The meeting decided to designate their concerns as Trump's “longing”. The presidential candidate of the American Republicans became for them a kind of Volan de Mort (the villain from the Harry Potter books, whose name "is pronounced only in a whisper and behind closed doors"). Trump serves as a "particularly vulgar" spokesman for "the collapse and disintegration of the economic order that has developed since the end of World War II." This man also demonstrates a complete break with the official policy of the White House, which has been conducted so far.

IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde raised some of the major problems, but could not give any guidance on how to solve them.

Developed economies, she noted in her speech, “are stuck on a cycle of low growth, low investment, low inflation.” At the same time, emerging markets showed growth. As for exporters of raw materials, low prices hit them.

Growth was “too long too low,” she continued, and this led to social and political consequences that stem from high inequality. This problem "becomes too obvious."

Recalling the principles on which the IMF was created in 1944, in the face of economic difficulties resulting from the depression and World War II, she noted that “if the founding fathers were here today, they would certainly be concerned.” The principles of open trade and openness in general are under threat today. It is the multilateral dialogue that is the key to the stability of the world economy, Lagarde said. “Now, these principles are being subjected to the most serious tests in recent decades,” she believes.

Suma Chakrabarti, President of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, agrees with Lagarde’s remarks about threats to the fundamental principles of the IMF: “In my life I can’t recall such skepticism about these fundamental values ​​that we are witnessing today.”

Some of the major problems of global economic and political order were the subject of a column for former US Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, who published his opinion in the Financial Times last Monday.

Summing up the IMF meeting, he pointed to the "ghost" of insufficient economic growth, on the one hand, and growing populism and global disintegration, on the other. Here is a common problem: "... traditional leaders have lost their orientation on the road, and the world economy has entered uncharted and dangerous territory."

Nick Beams points out that Summers does not believe in the financial crisis as the main cause of the current "stagnation." Most likely, low interest rates today reflect a surplus of savings compared to investments that began to form in the middle of the 1980-s. And this is the main reason for the failure of predictions about the restoration of economic growth for several years after the 2008 crisis of the year. “After seven years of economic over-optimism,” he pointed out in his column, “there is a growing awareness that the problems were not so much inherited from the financial crisis, but from profound structural changes in the global economy.”

From here and political crisis: the population of the countries ceased to trust the leaders. It is not surprising that as the economic growth slowed down year after year, the beneficiaries were a small number of individuals, and the electorate lost confidence "both in the competence of economic leaders and in their desire to serve the general public, and not in a handful of the global elite."

Mr. Summers himself is a Keynesian (in the current interpretation of Keynes’s ideas).

In a capitalist economy, production is motivated at a fundamental level by not the need for economic growth or the desire to satisfy social needs, but the pursuit of profit, and nothing else, Beams writes. If the rate of return shows a downward trend, investments are reduced, which, in turn, leads to a decrease in economic growth rates, and this leads to a further decrease in investment expenditures. As a result, for a long-term perspective, lower growth rates are being laid, and even “age-old stagnation”.

These basic considerations are crucial in evaluating the recommendations proposed by Summers and his associates regarding a potential reform of the capitalist system. According to Summers, the challenge is to find a way forward, which will strengthen international cooperation. This means focusing on “concerns of a wide middle class, not global elites”. Accordingly, the ideas of "austerity in the economy" should be rejected in favor of the "investment economy." The focus of international economic cooperation should shift from the opportunity for capital to better labor outcomes.

However, these two goals are incompatible within the framework of a capitalist economy, reminds Beams.

The only solution to the problem of the deepening crisis, he believes, is not at all reforms that are still impossible. Most likely, the task is to transform the energy of “increasing anger and hostility towards the global economic and political order” into a “conscious political movement”. This movement could be based "on a program of international socialism based on the overthrow of the most outdated capitalist profit system." It was this “political lesson” Beams derived from the results of the IMF meeting.

Concerning IMF reportthen another problem that was noted in it is the reduction of financial stability in the banking sector.

Low profitability over time can reduce the reserves of banks and undermine their ability to support economic growth. Over 25% of banks in countries with developed economies (with a volume of assets of approximately 11,7 trillion. Dollars) will remain in a weakened state and will face serious problems.

Debts are another source of instability, especially in emerging market countries. Approximately 11% of enterprises' debt (over 400 billion dollars) is today found in companies with low debt repayment potential. At the same time, the preservation of fast credit growth rates in China and the increase in the volume of shadow banking products there are sources of increasing risks for financial stability.

Problems threaten and pension systems. “Strengthening the position of life insurance companies and pension funds remains a critical task,” the IMF document says. - A long period of low growth and low interest rates creates significant difficulties for organizations engaged in long-term investment and savings, such as insurance companies and pension funds. Regulators and supervisors should take immediate action to maintain strong balance sheets of insurance companies and pension funds, including by identifying insolvency risks and funding gaps over the medium term while strengthening the reform program to tighten standards on internal models and capital bases and increasing transparency. ".

The report shows that the recommendations of the IMF are rather general in nature and that the currency authorities show some tendency to panic worldwide. It is also obvious that the Chinese do not fully agree with the conclusions of the IMF, since they spoke about their problems in the Fund before, and Beijing continues to smile sweetly. They probably have their own programs and recommendations that Lagarde did not bring to the notice.

As for the ideas of Comrade Beams, the “overthrowing” of the capitalist system looks like an even more vague version of the amendment of the situation. If Beams proposes a world revolution, then he should be recognized as the new Trotsky (at the World Socialist Web Site, Comrade Trotsky is just honored). However, the dream of such a socialist revolution appears in the transnational century and the century of the middle class much more unrealizable than in the days of Lenin.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    29 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      13 October 2016 06: 54
      Credit more all sorts of nonsense in Ukraine .. Then it’s for sure the financial system kirdyk ..
      1. +1
        13 October 2016 10: 40
        In one fairy tale it was about a genie who spent all his power on * accumulating * values ​​and * encapsulating * time. It is very likely that in the USA they are striving for precisely this. Any reasonable attempt to build the future of the United States is a failure. They themselves understand that without reconstruction of the existing state apparatus, the USA has no future. Those who are in power cannot * limit * their own well-being for the sake of the future of their * grandchildren *, there are completely different * values ​​* in use.
      2. +5
        13 October 2016 11: 03
        Quote: dmi.pris
        Credit more all sorts of nonsense in Ukraine .. Then it’s for sure the financial system kirdyk ..

        Trotskyists-Zionists, apart from revolutions during which there is an opportunity to "fish in troubled waters", to rob the poor people they have robbed, can offer nothing more! Shedding rivers of blood of the Slavic people is yes! This is their concept ... But everything will be veiled and camouflaged under plausible pretexts. Under the pretext of improving life, liberation from oppression, etc.
        It is necessary to recreate industry, provide people with employment without paying
        squeals of the West
        1. +7
          13 October 2016 13: 34
          German Foreign Minister I. von Ribbentrop, SS Oberführer R. Likus, who was in charge of processing information received through agent channels in the "personal headquarters" of the minister, put the following agent report from Geneva:
          "The British plans for the disruption of the oil supply of Germany and Russia from Geneva secretly report:
          The British side wants to make an attempt to cut off the Russians from oil sources and at the same time intends to influence Romania in one form or another and, having caused a conflict in the Balkans, deprive Germany of oil supplies. Cutting off the Soviet Union and Germany from oil ... (British. - Auth.) Hope to quickly and radically solve the problem; it is assumed that in sharply worsened conditions, these countries will move to an open struggle against each other ...
          Further, the English side will attempt to mobilize Trotsky's group, that is, the IV International, and somehow transfer it to Russia. Agents in Paris report that Trotsky, with the help of the British, will have to return to Russia to organize a coup against Stalin. To what extent these plans can be implemented, it is difficult to judge from here (from Geneva. - OV).
          Berlin, January 17, 1940 L [ikus] "
          (RA AA Bonn: Dienststelle Ribbentrop. Vertrauliche Mitarbeiterberichte II, 5/1, Teil 2 (R 27122), Bl. 59626-59627.)

          There is nothing strange in the fact that history repeats itself, and the forces that are set in motion to slow down the development of RUSSIA are all the same, the Trotskyists are different, nationalists, Western liberals .. The spiral, however ...
    2. +2
      13 October 2016 06: 59
      Let's be fair to Comrade Trotsky: he was just the last major supporter of the world revolution, and by no means a lone rebel. The expression of the ideas of the "worldwide conflagration" was also Marx in his time, and Lenin, and Stalin did not avoid the same. But everything somehow calmed down after the revolution in Russia, people achieved power, the troubles were no longer necessary, and Trotsky did not retreat from his principles, good or bad is a separate issue. And now it is a hanger for all dogs associated with the theme of the world revolution.
      1. +3
        13 October 2016 11: 37
        Quote: inkass_98
        Let's be fair to Comrade Trotsky: he was just the last major supporter of the world revolution, and by no means a lone rebel. The expression of the ideas of the "worldwide conflagration" was also Marx in his time, and Lenin, and Stalin did not avoid the same. But everything somehow calmed down after the revolution in Russia, people achieved power, the troubles were no longer necessary, and Trotsky did not retreat from his principles, good or bad is a separate issue. And now it is a hanger for all dogs associated with the theme of the world revolution.

        he is this Trotsky of yours, executioner and villain who spilled rivers of blood of the Russian people.
        Him, his followers and faithful disciples a place in ADU!
      2. +5
        13 October 2016 13: 15
        collection
        So, going around, dumping everything that they heard about revolutionary programs into a heap is a special talent * of a tiligent *. It is difficult to read Trotsky, all the more so since he has many ideas and too often contradict the previous ones.
        The Bolsheviks' programs almost always corresponded to the historical moment, but I did not meet in the program of ideas on the sacrifice of RUSSIA for the sake of * worldwide * rrrevolution. And yet, since 1917 the Bolsheviks built the STATE.
      3. +4
        13 October 2016 13: 26
        Let's.
        Honestly and accurately, the Trotsky provocateur in the communist movement, used since the beginning of the 20th century to collectively compromise the communist project.
        Trotsky’s contacts with the Reichswehr, and then with the command of the Wehrmacht and the SS, are not accidental.
        Will you deny it?
        Let me remind you of the statement contained in the memoirs of Siqueiros, which the authors regarding the reasons for the death of Trotsky, for some reason, ignore. Siqueiros, very clearly stated the motives that guided him and his comrades, making an attack on Trotsky's headquarters. He wrote:
        "It was no longer a question of revenge for the" dastardly revolt organized by the LOUM in Berselon ", but of" preventing the furious propaganda that was carried out from Trotsky's headquarters, allegedly from a truly Marxist, proletarian position against the Soviet Union. "
        At this point, “it became completely clear” that Trotskyism could provide certain services of “the possible aggression of the combined imperialist forces against the first country of socialism.
        Our desire to liquidate this counter-revolutionary political center corresponded to the very dynamics of the development of the international situation, characterized by an increasing threat of war against the USSR ”(DA Siqueiros. They called me a dashing colonel: Memoirs / Transl. Ssp. M., 1986. P.224-225) .
        The Soviet-German non-aggression pact, which allowed the USSR to remain outside the imperialist war, dealt a very sensitive blow to the calculations of Trotsky and his supporters. It was no accident that he was sharply attacked by them (Trotskyists remain to this day his most ardent critics.).
        In a series of articles published in Trotsky’s Bulletin of the Opposition, the main press organ, and on the pages of the Western press, the Trotskyists sharply criticized the treaty and tried to prove that the Soviet Union was not a neutral state, but Hitler’s military ally (In this matter, the right and the “ultra left "Historiography today is strikingly unanimous.). This position was especially pronounced during the period of the Soviet-Finnish war. In an article published in January 1940 in the American magazine Liberty, Trotsky bluntly stated:
        “The Kremlin harnessed itself to the wagon of German imperialism, and the enemies of Germany became thereby the enemies of Russia. As long as Hitler is strong - and he is very strong - Stalin will remain his satellite ”(RA AA Bonn: Pol. V. Politische Beziehungen RuЯlands zu Deutschland, Bd. 3 (R 104358), Bl.ohne Nummer (Pol V 2131/40, Deutsche Botschaft in Washington an das AA Nr. 121 vom 22. Januar 1940).).

        So that your Trotsky, bloody executioner, in any form, is unacceptable for Russia, like his last ones striving in connection with nationalists, liberals-Westerners to provoke some kind of revolution.
      4. +3
        13 October 2016 13: 30
        We continue to smear the floor of your idol.

        The idea of ​​using Trotsky in the struggle against the USSR in this period arose not only among the politicians of England and France. In December 1939, the State Council of Finland, for example, openly discussed the formation of an alternative Russian government led by Trotsky or A.F. Kerensky (Winter War 1939-1940. Prince. 1. Political history. M., 1998. S. 181-182.).
        Let us cite excerpts from two documents stored in the Political Archive of the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
        The German consul in Geneva reported to the military intelligence department of the foreign ministry in Berlin:
        “German Consulate of Geneva, January 8, 1940
        K No. 62
        ... In connection with the information about the concentration of troops (Anglo-French. - Auth.) In Syria presented in previous reports, the following messages and rumors sent by agents from France and Geneva will probably be of interest. According to them, England intends to deliver a sudden blow not only to the Russian oil regions, but will also try to deprive Germany of the Romanian oil sources in the Balkans.
        ... An agent in France reports that the British plan through Trotsky’s group in France to establish contact with Trotsky’s people in Russia itself and try to organize a coup against Stalin. These coup attempts should be seen as being in close connection with the British intention to seize Russian oil sources.
        Krauel
        (PA AA Bonn: Pol. I M. Geheim. Agenten- und Spionagewesen: Nachrichten, Bd. 7 (R 102039), Bl. Ohne Nummer (Deutsches Konsulat Genf and das AA, K Nr. 62 vom 8. Januar 1940). )

        So who did your idol work for, if not for forces directly hostile to the USSR, or rather RUSSIA, which was at that time like the USSR?

        Still want a piece of information about the activities of this bloody executioner? And in whose favor did he act?
      5. 0
        16 October 2016 10: 43
        Trotsky did not back down from his principles, is it good or bad - a separate issue

        Trotsky returned to his principles after being expelled from the USSR. I had to earn a living. In the 20s, the demon of the revolution led the life of a landowner, lived on an estate, went hunting, read French novels. Nafig surrendered to him the principles and the struggle for the cause of the revolution ....
    3. +5
      13 October 2016 07: 00
      “If the founding fathers were here today, they would surely be worried.”
      they would undoubtedly have to be hung immediately
      1. +1
        13 October 2016 09: 05
        they would undoubtedly have to be hung immediately

        I agree that there would be no Marxist muds in Russia then, the British flag would still fly over all America, no Hitler would dare to challenge them, and he would not appear, due to the unreality of the WWII and as a result of the post-war humiliation of Germany
    4. +4
      13 October 2016 07: 18
      And the recipes are simple.

      1. Trim the Pentagon’s budget by $ 500 billion to eliminate the US budget deficit.
      2. Cut the consumption level in Sodomite states by 2 times (raise taxes at least) and use the appropriate funds to pay off debts - at least the illusion arises that these debts can be repaid.
      3. Stop printing unsecured money - remember, finally, that the measure of value is gold and real things. To this end, to return the limited gold standard - there must be some kind of exchange conditions that prevent the artisan from printing $ 100500 trillion.
      4. Forced to pierce asset value bubbles; bring them to real form. Prohibit derivative financial instruments, paper gold, paper oil, air startups, etc.
      5. Root out politics from the economy.
      6. Stop fragmenting world trade.
      7. Limit protectionism.
      8. To put an end to all kinds of unprofitable inventions - limiting the emission of greenhouse gases, shale revolutions, the so-called renewable energy, supposedly apocalyptic nuclear energy, etc.
      9. Set countries and companies with real ratings.
      10. Many other things.
      1. +2
        13 October 2016 07: 32
        When there was the USSR, the Western countries accused him of priority of politics over the economy.
        Now in the West the whole economy is riddled with politics.
      2. 0
        13 October 2016 08: 57
        . Stop printing unsecured money - remember, finally, that the measure of value is gold and real things.
        If printed money is readily accepted, why not print it?
        Read your suggestions carefully, they are not feasible because they lead to the collapse of the existing world order system, no one will conduct such reforms to the detriment of their positions and influence.
        The next stage of development will be possible only with the introduction of new technologies.
        There was an era of steam, then a century of gasoline and oil, something that was coming to replace them.
        1. +2
          13 October 2016 09: 37
          Read carefully your suggestions, they are not feasible because they lead to the collapse of the existing world order system,


          laughing Of course. But if you do not do so normatively, then the same thing will be done in an explicit order.

          By the way, I at least suggested something, unlike the IMF. laughing
      3. 0
        13 October 2016 09: 24
        Not everything is so simple :-) (C)
        Quote: Gormengast
        2. Trim the level of consumption in Sodomite states by 2 times (raise taxes at least)

        In Europe, and so taxes from 40% to 75% (in France you were so boiling that Depardieu immediately became a citizen of the Russian Federation)
        Quote: Gormengast
        Stop printing unsecured money - remember, finally, that the measure of value is gold and real things

        Money is secured not only by the country's foreign exchange reserves, but also by goods produced on the territory of that country, so printing money during industrial production is normal
        Quote: Gormengast
        5. Root out politics from the economy.

        These two things are generally inseparable, because politics determines the economy and vice versa (for example, a neighbor wants to buy a punch from you and offers money (this is economics), but you know that he wants to start repairs and your quiet life is over and say that he is a puncher you yourself need it (this is politics))
        Quote: Gormengast
        8. End all unprofitable inventions - limiting the emission of greenhouse gases

        An excess of carbon dioxide is unlikely to benefit everyone, because people are not plants
        Quote: Gormengast
        7. Limit protectionism.

        Well, why then, for example, Gazprom is trying so hard to extend pipelines wherever possible, this is protectionism :-)
        In general, dreams, dreams, where is your sweetness :-)
        1. +3
          13 October 2016 09: 51
          In Europe, and so taxes from 40% to 75%


          And what to do? Do not pay accumulated debts? Discard them? Lenders are unlikely to agree with this. There is no other way out. The retribution for the free life of ancestors should lie on the shoulders of descendants.

          Money is secured not only by the country's foreign exchange reserves, but also by goods produced on the territory of that country, so printing money during industrial production is normal


          Here you agree with me; since I wrote gold and real things, i.e. products. But you can’t print money for gold certificates that are not backed by metal and for forward contracts for oil, whose holders do not have any oil and have not seen it in their eyes. This is all paper speculation; printing paper money under another paper.

          These two things are generally inseparable


          Separable, at least partially. If shale gas is objectively more expensive than piped gas, then the second cannot be limited in favor of the first by administrative acts (such as reducing the dependence on the supplier, etc.). If there is a contract for Mistral and it is signed and paid, then the Mistral should be delivered regardless of the main sodomy brain in the Hollande and Obama.
          If undemocratic Iran has placed money in the United States, then this money cannot be arrested for the undemocratic nature of its owner.

          An excess of carbon dioxide is unlikely to benefit everyone, because people are not plants


          It is farther to a real excess than to interstellar flight. The beneficiaries of the agreements are liberal countries. Russia will get more benefits from the greenhouse effect. And if the plutocrats want Russia to limit emissions to their own detriment, then let the yasak of Russia pay for their comfort. Unfortunately, home-grown liberals do not understand this. We, the Russians, should not care at all for the drought in the USA.

          Well, why then, for example, Gazprom is trying so hard to extend pipelines wherever possible, this is protectionism :-)


          I wrote softly - restrict. Gazprom adheres to a normal aggressive trading model; I do not claim that it is correct, I only claim that it is completely capitalistic.
          1. +1
            13 October 2016 13: 14
            Quote: Gormengast
            We, the Russians, should not care at all for the drought in the USA.

            A drought can happen in Russia, remember for example 2010, an anticyclone, heat, fires, and there wasn’t even a noticeable excess, so nature is fragile and it’s amazing to say the least for us, and all the processes in interconnected
            1. +2
              13 October 2016 15: 51
              Drought may happen in Russia


              Most of our territory is a zone of risky farming. And huge territories are generally frozen. Our NSR is ice-covered. So, from some warming there will be some harm, some benefit, but more benefit. Europeans - let them roast - they did nothing good to me. Moreover, they popularly explained to me that I must be an egoist, individualist and hedonist. The same applies to "enough for our time." Let socialism be returned to me - then I will think about the future, otherwise - alas.
    5. +1
      13 October 2016 07: 38
      IMF recommendations are quite general and that the currency authorities show some inclination to panic worldwide

      And what other character may recommendations of those who only know how to give loans at% to those whom the United States point to and put the record in the right line. The subordinate accountant cannot make strategic recommendations.
    6. +3
      13 October 2016 08: 52
      In a capitalist economy, production is motivated on a fundamental level not by the need for economic growth or the desire to satisfy social needs, but by the pursuit of profit, and nothing more
      The question is, where did we get in after the collapse of the USSR, what are we creating? Paradise on earth for a handful of the elite? And all those beautiful speeches of Putin and Medvedev are all the noodles that they hang us.
      1. +1
        13 October 2016 13: 25
        You ask rhetorical questions. According to the Constitution, we live in a bourgeois state with a republican form of government.

    7. 0
      13 October 2016 15: 21
      Parasites are ready to do anything except liquidation of usury.
      "The little demon, holding his hoof under him,
      Twisted the usurer at the hellish fire.
      Hot dripping heat in a smoked trough
      And the baked usurer was bursting on fire.
      ... This execution makes sense:
      Having one acquisition is always in the subject,
      Fat of their debtors was sucked by this evil old man
      And they mercilessly twisted in your world. "
      (A.S. Pushkin, PSS t. 3-1, M., 1995, p. 281)

      We have no doubt that the time has come for the practical implementation of the prophetic figurative and symbolic predictions of A.S. Pushkin.
      http://pr0zrenie.narod.ru/Information/02_05.htm

      Efimov. "Economic alphabet".

      And Trotsky from the very beginning of his revolutionary activities received support from the financial international.
      1. 0
        14 October 2016 00: 24
        Quote: stopkran
        Hot dripping heat in a smoked trough


        suggest: Hot dripping FAT in smoked trough
    8. 0
      13 October 2016 16: 49
      Quote: Gormengast
      8. To put an end to all kinds of unprofitable inventions - limiting the emission of greenhouse gases, shale revolutions, the so-called renewable energy, supposedly apocalyptic nuclear energy, etc.

      I agree with many, except for this point. But the desire of those who privatized world power to change something is approaching zero, and a large part of the population simply does not want to see the need for change. "The American Dream" smells bad, but as before it beckons!
    9. +1
      13 October 2016 20: 06
      "However, the dream of such a socialist revolution looks much more unrealizable in the transnational age and in the age of the middle class than it did in the days of Lenin."
      However, the apologists for capitalism cannot offer anything new in the economy, trying to invent new theories of capitalism based on the predominance of profit (money). And as soon as he is not called both free and liberal, and things are still there - only crises become permanent! They are afraid of socialism as a trait of incense, not seeing that further decay of the capital society threatens the extinction of humanity. And the rapid growth of economies in developing countries is due to the fact that they have just entered the phase of development of capitalism in their countries, overcoming, in fact, the feudal structure of their economies. And in the future, pretty soon, they will also fall into a period of constant crises. It’s just that capitalism has not yet outlived itself in them, but is still developing, unlike the so-called developed countries of the West. At this stage, capitalism needs new markets to extend its agony, and this niche is rapidly declining. And if you do not curb these regressive forces, then the world will slide to technofascism and stagnation. hi
    10. 0
      14 October 2016 00: 21
      АВТОР This movement could be based "on a program of international socialism based on the overthrow of the most obsolete capitalist profit system." It was this “political lesson” that Beams deduced from the outcome of the IMF meeting.

      Do not rush to shout hurray that everyone will be fine. The mechanism for building "international socialism" will be as follows:
      1. The pooling of resources around the world, under the control of the World Committee.
      2. The allocation of resources under the control of the World Committee.
      3. Disposal of surplus and irregular world population under the control of the World Committee.
      Greetings from Trotsky.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"