General PLA: American EuroPRO threatens Russia

55
Information Agency TASS publishes information on the joint briefing of representatives of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and the main military department of the PRC. The briefing addresses issues of the missile defense system, which the United States of America is trying to establish in the regions without discussing aspects of the problem at the international level.

Major-General Cai Jun, Deputy Chief of Operations Management of the United States Directorate of Civil Defense and Safety of China, said that the US missile defense system in Eastern Europe poses a threat to the Russian Federation and upsets the balance of power throughout the Eurasian macro-region.



TASS cites a general statement from the PLA:
The United States, implementing the plan for the phased development of the European missile defense system, did not provide legal guarantees of its non-directionality against the Russian Federation. At the same time, in reality, it represents a direct threat to the security of Russia.


General PLA: American EuroPRO threatens Russia


Recall that the beginning of the discussion of the deployment of missile defense by Americans with their puppets from Eastern Europe took place back in the years when the United States called Russia "its great friend." At the same time, Washington argued the deployment of elements of the European missile defense system "countering the Iranian threat." There is no Iranian threat, but despite this, the US has established a missile defense segment in Romanian Deveselu, and by the year 2018 will create a similar segment in Poland.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    55 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +8
      11 October 2016 11: 34
      I wonder who would doubt it. Major General, just a captain of evidence.
      1. +28
        11 October 2016 11: 36
        Quote: Sirocco
        Major General, just a captain of evidence.

        Everyone understands that, but how many people talk about it loudly.
        1. +18
          11 October 2016 11: 49
          Quote: katalonec2014
          Quote: Sirocco
          Major General, just a captain of evidence.

          Everyone understands that, but how many people talk about it loudly.

          Yes, not many. And the fact that China said this is a strong US slap in the face.
          1. +12
            11 October 2016 11: 55
            Quote: Wend
            Yes, not many. And the fact that China said this is a strong US slap in the face.

            The United States is organizing exactly the same kind of scum for China, they are also building a missile defense system - here the Chinese have cut their voice
            1. +2
              11 October 2016 13: 01
              Quote: Gray Brother
              The United States is organizing exactly the same kind of scum for China, they are also building a missile defense system - here the Chinese have cut their voice

              The point is, Russia is not opposed by the United States and Britain, but by the NATO bloc, or rather Seven with its sixes, it is clear that the military and economic potential of the enemy is powerful and requires us to exert strength. Nooo, GDP was created by BRICS, as a result of which the Seven is opposed by a bloc already commensurate in economic and military potential, with one country in America, i.e. Brazil alone in Africa i.e. South Africa, one in the Indian Ocean, i.e. India, alone in the Asia-Pacific, i.e. China, the Russian Federation itself is one member in Europe, the body in Asia, testicles in the Far East, and the priest from Alaska, i.e. America (mainland) 3 km. Moreover, the Russian Federation united even a few rivals (India and China), socialist, caste and capitalist countries. Those. GDP at key points on the globe has placed allies. And now in the Indian Ocean our presence is not needed (as the USSR puffed up), and Indian kshatriyas do it, of course we gave them an aircraft carrier, nuclear submarines for rent, but all this at the expense of the economy of mighty India, with the PRC and everything is clear, we First of all, we provide aviation (the Chinese did not succeed in making their own at the level). In South Africa (by the way, a solid manufacturer of weapons and an illegal possessor of nuclear weapons, say, like Israel) and Brazil are a separate issue ...
              1. +3
                11 October 2016 14: 01
                Do you really think that South Africa and India will oppose Britain and the United States? Read the agreement between Britain and these countries.!
              2. +6
                11 October 2016 14: 36
                Venerable Hrych, the presentation, as always, is clear and intelligible, but the question is whether these allies will unite, if they only firmly realize that when they deal with us, they will be next without options.
              3. +2
                11 October 2016 15: 31
                Quote: Pirogov
                Do you really think that South Africa and India will oppose Britain and the United States? Read the agreement between Britain and these countries.!

                There was such a Molotov-Ribentrop Pact, there was the Munich Agreement, all this is nothing at a certain moment. There is oil left for 50 years, but at an economic growth rate of 20, they say that India has Neftyanaya refueling next to it, and that’s all. In this case, the issue does not yet concern a direct military clash of blocks, but regarding the expulsion of the dollar from mutual settlements between the BRICS countries and the prospects for obtaining resources for the state economy. The United States and Britain are not in direct confrontation with India (in order to force them to continue to use the dollar), but they are attacking Pakistan, one way or another, but the redivision of the world and resources is just around the corner, everyone is preparing for it, building aircraft carriers, etc. And in 1961, the Indians Goa has been annexed with bloodletting from a NATO member since 1949 - Portugal between times ...
                Quote: Warrior with machine gun
                that when they deal with us, they will be next without options

                Kurchatov and Korolev did not sleep at night so that this would never happen, they couldn’t take Russia by swords and spears, flintlock rifles and messers, now with our nuclear missile technologies. True, Russia almost died in the fall of the USSR from internal contradictions and a hybrid war, but now there is a vaccine against this. One way or another, Brazil, China, South Africa and India went for the Russian Federation, believing in its invulnerability. They did not create BRICS overnight, and the first summit was held only in 2009 after the victory of the Russian Federation in the Caucasus, then an agreement was reached on settlements in national currencies and the creation of a fund in contrast to the IMF and the Bank of BRICS countries. I repeat the case moved when the Russian Federation showed its decisiveness against the will of the hegemon and got away with it. In principle, in addition to controlling the Range, this is the main conquest and a signal that Russia has returned. The Russian Federation is arming BRICS not childishly, moreover, aircraft carriers, submarines including nuclear, aviation, the Kyrgyz Republic, etc. While the attack is on the dollar and the overthrow of economic oppression, then the hegemon will obviously be chased after the Russians have cleared the staff from Manas, and the Chinese from the Philippines. And it’s possible that Incirlik will also be touring for a good gas discount. laughing
          2. +2
            11 October 2016 12: 25
            Quote: Wend
            Yes, not many. And the fact that China said this is a strong US slap in the face.


            Come on. Despite the treaties between Russia and China, the latter prefers to watch the Russia-America + NATO clash as if from the outside, only sometimes timidly muttering something like: "America is an aggressor, and America is so and so ..." ... But it turned out to be weak to support our positions in the UN. A muddy "partner".
            And after that, China abstained.
            1. +6
              11 October 2016 12: 36
              And after that, China abstained.


              Why not clarify? China abstained from the French resolution and voted for the Russian one. What is the intrigue here? And this despite the fact that the economic ties between China and the United States are hundreds of times stronger than China - the Russian Federation.
        2. +5
          11 October 2016 12: 00
          Such statements are simply not being made ... The reverse made in favor of Russia (although in fact the missile defense system in prostitutional states of Eastern Europe is actually directed against Russia) is a payment beautiful, as if our military (not the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) had stated that they had been washed by China the islands are the territory of China and the entire body of water from the mainland of China to them is its internal water area ...
          1. +1
            11 October 2016 12: 04
            Quote: Now we are free
            as if our military (so far not the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) had declared that the islands washed by China are the territory of China and the entire body of water from the mainland of China to them is its internal water area ...

            Well?
            They say the United States will be in shock, we are then from their shock, only one plus.
            Control over the ocean is against the USA, here is such a hassle for amers ..
          2. +1
            11 October 2016 12: 36
            Quote: Now we are free
            Such statements are simply not made ...

            of course ... they are made slyly squinting ...
        3. +1
          11 October 2016 12: 43
          Quote: katalonec2014
          Everyone understands that, but how many people talk about it loudly.

          What is the use of talking loudly? If they helped with the deed, that would be what is needed (maybe they help, who knows, because we see the tip of the iceberg, and only Lavrov knows what is under water laughing )
          After all, it is not a secret to anyone in the EU that ISIS originated from Iraq, after the peaceful bombing of the United States, and the supply of weapons to the "peasants", and these peasants rushed to the EU, creating problems, but Russia is to blame, THERE IS SPEAKING about it. And everyone takes it for the truth. It turns out the truth is not needed in the EU, something like this ((((
      2. +6
        11 October 2016 11: 38
        Yes, not all right. China needs to actively engage in counteraction with the United States, together with Russia.
        And then they sat in a quiet harbor. China understands that if we win, they won’t lose.
        If Russia loses, the States, along with the Japanese, are like cockroaches. If any nuclear potential can be neutralized by the Americans, then this is Chinese.

        P.E. The Chinese need to be more active in the international arena in tandem with the Russian Federation.
        1. WKS
          +2
          11 October 2016 11: 51
          Of course, the Chinese is right, but ... "did not discover America." Everyone has known this for a long time. It is also clear that these missile defense systems are already targeted by Russian means of destruction as primary targets, and possibly even nuclear ones.
      3. +2
        11 October 2016 11: 42
        Here I was waiting .. who the first to say is a masterpiece comment ... YOU have surpassed everyone.
        You see, it’s not clear that for the West they are NOT fussing with missile defense areas in Europe, that Russia’s NOT FACT for them, the population is being treated in the same way, and therefore the task is to blame Russia for all serious things.
        Now, China's statement on the problem - now the West is scratching its turnips, not only has a weighty word been said about missile defense in Europe against Russia, but also the creation of a missile defense system in Russia and China, against the West - you have everything "captain obvious" ...
      4. +5
        11 October 2016 12: 00
        Well, if this is an expression of the official position of the Chinese political leadership, simply embedded in the mouth of the general, then this is a good signal to the American - not really to bog down! Hinting that the Celestial Empire is, at the moment, Russia's strategic partner, it will not leave us face to face with the United States and its satellites, if all of a sudden ... And in China there is only a mobilization resource - 200 million people! Even if they simply come to the USA to illegal immigrants, the island will simply sink to ... dogs along with the White House, the Statue of Liberty, Hollywood and Yellowstone ...! Like Atlantis! laughing
        1. +3
          11 October 2016 12: 10
          The United States is creating a powerful strike component for possible decapitation strikes against Russia and China. This was stated at a briefing on the "Global echeloned missile defense system of the United States as a threat to the military security of Russia and China and strategic stability in the world" in Beijing, First Deputy Chief of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Viktor Poznihnir.

          According to him, America is creating a missile defense system to neutralize the nuclear capabilities of Russia and China and achieve military superiority.
          The creation of a layered missile defense system is not associated with threats emanating from Iran and North Korea, as stated in the United States.
          According to the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, in 2020 the US missile defense system will include about 50 GBI (Ground-Based Interceptor), more than 200 THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) missiles and about 700 SM-3 land and sea based. Ships with a missile defense system literally surround Russia and China, and under the pretext of fighting Iran and North Korea, the United States of America is deploying a system against Russian and Chinese missiles. Http://warfiles.ru/show-131692-minoborony-zay
          avilo-o-podgotovke-ssha-udarnogo-komponenta-dlya-
          obezglavlivaniya.html
          1. 0
            11 October 2016 14: 07
            Quote: The Bloodthirster
            Ships with missile defense system literally surround Russia

            Can you imagine that the Russian Federation is in eleven time zones, how can it be surrounded, and the new heavyweight "Sarmat" is capable of attacking the United States through the South Pole. By the way, "Sarmat" will be tentatively put into service in a year, although they predicted 2020. Well done of course Makeevtsy. Here many doubted, tk. "Voevoda" was going to the Yuzhnoye design bureau, however, the Voevoda RD-264 engines were developed by our Energomash design bureau, in short, in 2017 we are waiting for successful tests.
            1. +1
              11 October 2016 14: 10
              Yes, I can imagine everything normally, there’s no bursa by Fursenko ..
              You take into account the number of carriers of cruise missiles from the Yankees and their minions, the directions from where they will hit us.
              As for Sarmat, the Governor of the remaining strategies will not be exchanged for LAN. They will not, but in case of a threat, yes, we will hit.
              1. 0
                11 October 2016 15: 54
                Quote: The Bloodthirster
                behind not a bursa on Fursenko ..

                drinks do not worry about the Kyrgyz Republic, they are subsonic and so that all marine carriers deploy and their doctrine of global non-nuclear decontamination strike implies Tomahawks with a land mine, and they have a range of 1500 km well 2000. Therefore, to hit targets in the depths of the territory carriers must go into our zone at once Bastion coastal complexes with supersonic Onyx, in short, they release subsonic CD, ours are supersonic in response, they start first, but the first explode before their KR reaches the coast. They themselves know the whole flaw of their doctrine by that and dream of hypersonic KR ...
          2. 0
            11 October 2016 16: 02
            "This fact was confirmed by a number of independent American experts," Poznihir said.
            Quote: hrych
            moreover, to enter into the zone of our coastal complexes Bastion with supersonic Onyx, in short they release subsonic RC, ours are supersonic in response, they start first, but the first explode before their KR reaches the coast. They themselves know the whole flaw of their doctrine by that and dream of hypersonic KR ...


            The simulation of combat use of missile defense (missile defense) by the United States, conducted by research institutions of the Russian Ministry of Defense, showed its greater danger to the nuclear potential of Russia and China than previously thought. This was stated by the first deputy chief of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Lieutenant General Viktor Poznihir.

            "Tomahok" and "Standard-3"

            "Simulations have shown that the Standard-3 interceptor missiles have the ability to intercept ICBMs and submarine ballistic missiles not only on average, as claimed by the United States, but also on the initial segment of the missile's flight path," Poznihir said, speaking on Tuesday at briefing in Beijing.

            According to him, "this poses a more serious threat to the nuclear potential of Russia and China, since the interceptor missiles will be capable of striking Russian and Chinese ballistic missiles until their warheads are separated from the marching stages."
            http://warfiles.ru/show-131693-opasnost-pro-ssha-
            dlya-yadernogo-poteniciala-rossii-okazalas-nedooc
            enennoy.html

            Not so simple.
            1. 0
              11 October 2016 16: 33
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              Modeling has shown that the Standard-3 interceptor missiles have the ability to intercept ICBMs and submarine ballistic missiles not only on the average, as claimed by the United States, but also on the initial segment of the missile's flight path

              This is either a curtsey towards the PRC, or ..., we have the latest ICBMs, against promising anti-missiles in the initial section they have a quasi-ballistic trajectory and a reduced acceleration section, in the middle section BB maneuvers and false targets, but for some reason they do not develop for the final, although our "Gazelle" is just the opposite ... The main advantage of the Russian Federation is the depth of the territory, which gives a reserve of flight time, as well as simply the impossibility of attacking in the acceleration section. About submarines there is generally darkness, they emerge from under the ice of the Arctic HZ where, they have to keep the Aegis carriers on an icebreaker in the Pole area. So either - this is an excuse to break the contract on the sly, there on plutonium, the RIAC, to place the Iskanders somewhere. And also to say: "Yes, we are very afraid of you, comrades are going the right way." At one time, we had a wave of horror at the threat of stealth, and as they drove themselves there to the very tomatoes, ours began to mock. The usual information war and disinformation for the enemy. One way or another, the Russian Federation has an early warning radar against ICBMs, it will create an echeloned missile defense system, against the CD, their carriers and stealth there will be a system of 10 Container ZGRLS, where the target height is from the surface and at a distance of 3000 km, i.e. you can't sneak up, and the irradiation wavelength does not allow stealth technologies to work in principle, and even satellites of the Liana system ...
    2. +1
      11 October 2016 11: 35
      The United States, implementing the plan for the phased development of the European missile defense system, did not provide legal guarantees of its non-directionality against the Russian Federation. At the same time, in reality, it represents a direct threat to the security of Russia.

      What I like about the Chinese is that when they need to keep silent (UN Security Council) they will be modestly silent or refrain at best, and when they feel that a threat may affect them, they suddenly remember that it is just necessary to respond.
      1. 0
        11 October 2016 11: 43
        Quote: rotmistr60
        The United States, implementing the plan for the phased development of the European missile defense system, did not provide legal guarantees of its non-directionality against the Russian Federation. At the same time, in reality, it represents a direct threat to the security of Russia.

        What I like about the Chinese is that when you need to keep silent (UN Security Council) they will modestly keep silent or at best refrain, and when they feel that the threat may affect them, they suddenly remember that it is simply necessary to respond.


        And what threatens China with the European missile defense?
        1. +1
          11 October 2016 12: 00
          China-ABM in South Korea.
          What, the amers got a fear of their eyes that you are beginning to ask obscure questions, they say, what is the matter of China to EuroPro?
          Nothing will come of the United States — Iskander already in Kaliningrad — the Polish US missile defense region — will be destroyed immediately.
          In Romania, well, Crimea will say its word
          Yu. Korea, well, there China will answer you.
        2. +1
          11 October 2016 12: 05
          And what threatens China with the European missile defense?

          Conversation dear gray smeet goes about missile defense in South Korea. Do you read the article or immediately draw your conclusions?
        3. +1
          11 October 2016 12: 06
          China wants to create a strategic alliance with us, which we have been hinting at for a long time!
          1. 0
            11 October 2016 12: 47
            Quote: You Vlad
            China wants to create a strategic alliance with us, which we have been hinting at for a long time!

            Do not be silly, there is no such intention in China.
            1. +2
              11 October 2016 13: 08
              Sirocco Read what Xi Jinping said in his speech marking the 95th anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party. - "The world is on the brink of radical changes. We see how the European Union is gradually collapsing, how the US economy is collapsing, all this will end with a new world order. It will never be the same as before, in 10 years we will have a new world order in which the key will be an alliance between China and Russia, "the Chinese leader is sure.

              However, it seems that this is not only about an economic union - although according to world experts, diplomats and politicians, relations between China and Russia "have never been so great." Xi Jinping, according to media reports, also announced a military alliance - which will make NATO powerless.

              “We are now witnessing aggressive actions from the United States, both against Russia and China. I believe that Russia and China can create an alliance in front of which NATO will be powerless and this will put an end to the imperialist aspirations of the West. What do you think about it? ? And for whom did he say it?

              - See more at: http://www.nakanune.ru/news/2016/07/03/22440495/#
              sthash.zUPFI3TV.dpuf
              1. 0
                11 October 2016 18: 03
                This is a fake, he did not say such a thing, has long been known. Do not read any jaundice
        4. +5
          11 October 2016 14: 42
          Korean direction threatens
    3. 0
      11 October 2016 11: 36
      Ah yes the Chinese!
      THAAD Accommodation in South Korea
      And right there.
      General PLA: American EuroPRO threatens Russia
      1. +1
        11 October 2016 11: 43
        Yes, but the article was postponed by a truncated, further continued, Russian-Chinese missile defense teachings.
    4. 0
      11 October 2016 11: 45
      And the Guys didn’t know ....
    5. +1
      11 October 2016 11: 49
      Russia is threatened by the very existence of the United States under its current policies.
    6. 0
      11 October 2016 11: 49
      it would be better if the general enlightened about China’s own missile defense and if it can close the Far Eastern sector if necessary
      1. 0
        11 October 2016 12: 10
        Quote: Volka
        Chinese missile defense and whether it can close the Far Eastern sector if necessary

        Ha ha ha !!! Why would the Chinese protect us? No need to build absolutely abstract illusions.
        1. +1
          11 October 2016 12: 15
          Well, if you have illusions ... all right, the leadership of Russia and China does not pay attention to your illusions.
    7. +1
      11 October 2016 11: 56
      The most effective remedy for such threats at our borders is an adequate response to the deployment of such weapons at the borders of the Indian capital, for example, somewhere in Venezuela, Cuba, etc.
      1. 0
        11 October 2016 12: 08
        Quote: cheburator
        deploying such weapons near the borders of the Indian subcontinent, for example, somewhere in Venezuela, Cuba, etc.

        Firstly, you should not consider Venezuela and Cuba to be our bosom friends - whether they will allow us to host something on their own is a big, big question.
        And secondly, look, Cheburah, in the textbooks how missiles fly and how they should be shot down - from Cuba, and even more so from Venezuela, this, unfortunately, is not possible for sofa specialists!
      2. +1
        11 October 2016 12: 56
        And why do you think that you can’t place in our territory? Arctic, Chukotka, not counting the SSBN.
    8. The comment was deleted.
    9. 0
      11 October 2016 12: 16
      That's right, but the Chinese are playing their game. They are not allies, they are waiting
    10. +2
      11 October 2016 12: 26
      Quote: The Bloodthirster
      China-ABM in South Korea.
      What, the amers got a fear of their eyes that you are beginning to ask obscure questions, they say, what is the matter of China to EuroPro?
      Nothing will come of the United States — Iskander already in Kaliningrad — the Polish US missile defense region — will be destroyed immediately.
      In Romania, well, Crimea will say its word
      Yu. Korea, well, there China will answer you.

      So what, what will be destroyed?
      In case of need, will he manage to launch missiles at our launchers?
      -Successful. So the combat mission is completed. And it can be considered neutralized strategic missile forces. Americans almost never wage a war from defense, their army is imprisoned for an attack.
      1. 0
        11 October 2016 14: 18
        Quote: LeeDer
        So what, what will be destroyed?

        I didn’t quite understand why you were answering me, if you better answer the Amer I Smith, otherwise they are there in their heat of superiority, they have completely lost their mind.
        At the expense of the Americans, they will have time for something there, but we don’t.
        Neutralize our Strategic Rocket Forces-well ... damn help if you can.
        Quote: LeeDer
        So what, what will be destroyed?
        In case of need, will he manage to launch missiles at our launchers?

        In the case of a start, this missile defense position area in Poland, whose location is already known and in sight, will be demolished immediately.
        The missile defense works on missiles that have left the mines, on the ascent path, but try to compete with Iskander ... when the wreckage of Amer’s missiles hits the Poles, you’ll be very surprised ...
    11. 0
      11 October 2016 12: 42
      Well, something really got tired of the Chinese comrades, if they even spoke about the threats to Russia !!! They never cared about anything but their own interests, but here ... Apparently, this even makes sense to them.
    12. +1
      11 October 2016 12: 54
      What legal guarantees do politicians and the military require? It is easier to insure a country in case of an atomic war in some reliable company.
    13. VP
      +1
      11 October 2016 13: 00
      In fact, there is much more detailed on this subject not from the PLA general, but from the general of the Russian Federation.
      From his speech in Beijing. Today's.
      http://www.interfax.ru/world/531967
    14. +1
      11 October 2016 13: 37
      Yes, everything is simple, information is being prepared for withdrawal from the INF Treaty.
    15. 0
      11 October 2016 16: 27
      Well done Chinese, and most importantly, on time !!! :)
    16. +1
      11 October 2016 17: 20
      Can you really believe the Americans if they provide legal guarantees that the European missile defense will not be directed against the Russian Federation? Can you really calm down and be so stupid? This is complete nonsense and nonsense! Yes, they promise anything and write anything. Russians and Russia are banging, smiling sweetly and clapping on the shoulder, calling Russians friends, Russia is a friend. Yes, it happened just like that. Type of babakhs in Russian, Russia, but such, oh, damn something happened , we ourselves don’t understand, probably skynet took possession of our missiles and flapped around Russians, Russia. Or aliens. But what, you, this is not us. We are your friends! HA HA HA!
    17. +1
      11 October 2016 20: 28
      Americans have long sought this. As they say, if you suffer for a long time, something will work out: Russia + China. So far so, and then let's see what the statements made in unison with respect to the American missile defense will pour out.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"