A Russian military base may appear in Egypt

104
Russia is negotiating with Egypt to lease a Soviet military base located in the Egyptian city of Sidi Barrani, according to News with reference to its sources.

A Russian military base may appear in Egypt




“Negotiations on Russia's participation in the restoration of Egyptian military facilities on the coast of the Mediterranean Sea in the Sidi-Barrani region are quite successful. In case of agreement with the terms of both parties, the base can start work already in 2019. Cairo is ready to agree to its lease by Moscow to solve the primary geopolitical tasks that meet the interests of the Egyptian side. According to the agreements reached at this stage, Russia will deliver the equipment by sea. Moreover, a permanent military contingent of the Russian Federation will be present at the base, however, the number of military personnel at the initial stage will be quite small ”, - told a diplomatic source.

The military base in the North African region is necessary for Russia “to solve geopolitical tasks in the conditions of serious instability in the region,” said a source in the Ministry of Defense.

An expert, a former member of the Egyptian general staff Talaat Musallyam: “The feasibility of a military air base in the Sidi Barrani area is obvious to Moscow. Despite the fact that the Russian Federation already has a similar base in Syrian Hmeimim, the presence of the Russian Air Force in Egypt will give Moscow the opportunity to solve military tasks in the western Mediterranean. And as a possible place for action we can consider, for example, Libya, where today an unstable situation remains. ”

A similar opinion is shared by the Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Defense Andrei Krasov.

“Today the situation is such that an increasing number of countries, including Egypt, are beginning to realize Russia's role in maintaining the balance of power in the world. Indeed, it is one thing to fight against terrorism in words, and quite another to take concrete measures, as the Russian Federation does. I think that we should establish cooperation with Egypt, this also applies to the joint restoration of the air force base, ”said the parliamentarian.
  • TASS
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

104 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    10 October 2016 08: 55
    Good news!
    1. +5
      10 October 2016 08: 57
      Two bases are me about Mistral.
      1. +12
        10 October 2016 09: 07
        Let the "exceptional" rejoice and understand that they have nothing to catch in the Mediterranean.
        1. +4
          10 October 2016 09: 59
          Let the "exceptional" rejoice and understand that they already have nothing to catch in the Mediterranean
          The news, of course, is interesting, but I do not think that it is feasible now. The Egyptians want to get more from Amer, because Egypt is one of two countries that receives direct, free, military assistance from the states. But in the medium term, when Russia presses in Islam and the coalition in Syria, everything is possible! hi
        2. +7
          10 October 2016 17: 48
          Let the "exceptional" rejoice and understand that they have nothing to catch in the Mediterranean.


          YRAYAYAAYAYAYAYAYA !!! wassat fellow

          Do you know you look stupid when you write such nonsense? Seriously, I would ask about the number of bases of "our partners" in the region, the number of ships, aircraft, how many loyal allies and vassals who are ready to rush to the slaughter at the first successful occasion. Count, then think, estimate.
          Although I think that laziness, it's easier to fool away and go on. And more and more such garbage in the comments sad
          1. +2
            10 October 2016 22: 48
            Quote: DarkMatter
            Do you understand that you look stupid when you write such nonsense?

            ... Do you think that the presence of a videoconferencing base exactly where indicated in the article is not a strategic position? ... here about who wrote nonsense it is necessary to understand hard ...
            Quote: DarkMatter
            Seriously, I would ask about the number of bases of "our partners" in the region, the number of ships, aircraft, how many loyal allies and vassals who are ready to rush to the slaughter at the first successful occasion.

            ... well, imagine the alignment yourself? ... not destiny? ... especially "how many loyal allies and vassals" delivered ... and how many? ... Turkey? ... oh, in light of recent events ... Cyprus? ... in the same place, maximum Anglica Air Force base, squadron size ... Greece? ... is it generally laughter ... Italy? ... in the same place, besides the base in Sicily ... who was Spain there? ... do they need it? ... they are not ... so who is there ready to rush the first green mattress whistle in the amount of 100500 ships and planes? ... a no one ... laughing
            Quote: DarkMatter
            Count, then think, estimate.

            ... counted, figured - neighing ... laughing
            Quote: DarkMatter
            Although I think that laziness, it's easier to fool away and go on. And more and more such garbage in the comments

            ... in the style of your comment? ... it's really just rubbish ... bully
            1. +1
              10 October 2016 23: 08
              Monk10 amers, to my deep regret, allies are not needed there! Two aircraft carrier groups more than cover all threats! I am Moreman, and I am sad to give such a comment, but this is a hard truth. All the little one was sent to Middle-earth, if that, again according to the formula, Die but the fleet is not a Shame, and the boys will definitely not Shame! Well, is that normal? How do you want to believe that the leadership of the country will finally understand that it is necessary to build Ships of the first and second rank!
            2. +2
              10 October 2016 23: 32
              Quote: Hunter
              Monk10 amers, to my deep regret, allies are not needed there!

              ... have arrived ... how is it that way? ... wink
              Quote: Hunter
              Two aircraft carrier groups more than cover all threats!

              ... drive into a square of 700x700 km. with a combat radius of 800 km. 60 LA, but when did the people learn how to count ... the Americans didn’t go away from behind ... it’s not a matter of Libya and Iraq ... you’ll have to fight off on all fronts ... this is Us, not Iraqis or Libyans ... hi
              Quote: Hunter
              All the little one was sent to Middle-earth, if that, again according to the formula, Die but the fleet is not a Shame, and the boys will definitely not Shame!

              ... what we are, and we fight ... by the way the little one is "hard-toothed" ... and God forbid, it can be very painful ... hi
              Quote: Hunter
              Well, is that normal? How do you want to believe that the leadership of the country will finally understand that it is necessary to build Ships of the first and second rank!

              ... and, no one knows about this, they just lay on the stove for 25 years since the collapse of the Union and didn’t blow a mustache ... or were things more important? ... Chechnya to remind and why? ... Georgia and why? ... Ukraine is now ... not so simple as it seems at first glance and superficial ... do not simplify ... hi
            3. 0
              11 October 2016 00: 26
              Inok10,
              Of course, I understand that you are trying to find the best side in everything, so to speak. Very often I agree with you, and sometimes not. This is the case.
              In my opinion, it’s obviously foolish to even assume that the United States, together with NATO, will huddle in the corner somewhere and shake with fear, will not have the influence and most definitely the military and political advantage in the Mediterranean. Their coastline occupies half of this sea, as well as ter water. What are you talking about? The number of airfields, military bases, ports, the same AUGs and other, among other things, is off the charts. Are you going to put all this on your shoulder blades using 2 strong points? And who is simplifying here?
              25 years did not lie. Was Chechnya? It was. But this is not a reason to dismiss reality. They haven’t built ships for 25 years, they haven’t saved the old ones, that’s the kind of reality in Middle-earth. She is such and no other. Let’s not arrange a second censor here. No, as 100 dill defeated the entire Russian army, 2300 Armat and so on were knocked out.
              Best regards hi
            4. +2
              11 October 2016 01: 05
              Quote: DarkMatter
              Of course, I understand that you are trying to find the best side in everything, so to speak. Very often I agree with you, and sometimes not. This is the case.

              ... the point of view everyone has the right to have an individual ... but the point of view is usually supported by arguments ... subjective references ... about the presence of allies in the United States, are very controversial, as I said above ... there are most likely fellow travelers. ..and now they already think that they are not on their way from the United States ... since they are not ready to receive another world war in Europe, much less for the interests of the United States and the English gentlemen who have already waved the EU pen ...
              Quote: DarkMatter
              In my opinion, it’s obviously foolish to even assume that the United States, together with NATO, will huddle in the corner somewhere and shake with fear, will not have the influence and most definitely the military and political advantage in the Mediterranean. Their coastline occupies half of this sea, as well as ter water. What are you talking about? The number of airfields, military bases, ports, the same AUGs and other, among other things, is off the charts.

              ... it is not necessary to combine the United States and the coastline of Europe in the Mediterranean Sea and that’s why, quote:
              "Europe can no longer afford to depend on one power and the military capabilities of individual countries. We must together take on the protection of our interests," Juncker said at the plenary session of the European Parliament in Strasbourg with an annual speech on EU policy priorities. "The Lisbon Treaty allows EU members, if they want to, to combine their defense capabilities in a permanent structural form. I believe it is time to seize this opportunity," he said. Source: https://ria.ru/world/20160914/1476916349.html
              ... that's how it turns out ... Europe’s frank attempt to get off the NATO cart ... and it was said less than 30 days ago ... and this is a fact ...
              Quote: DarkMatter
              Let’s not arrange a second censor here. No, as 100 dill defeated the entire Russian army, 2300 Armat and so on were knocked out.

              ... namely, talking about 100500 US ships and planes in the Mediterranean Sea ... while the United States is at home there, but how long will it last ... in the light of modern geopolitical events ... Regards! ... hi
            5. 0
              11 October 2016 01: 33
              Inok10,
              The conversation was that the United States will not be able to poke its head in Middle-earth, and not about World War 3. There is a small difference, it seems laughing
              Junkers, Lyashko, Poles, Balts and the rest can say what they want. I will be the first to open the champagne when and if NATO ceases to exist, or at least someone leaves the union, for starters.

              However, now we have everything the same as 10 years ago. The United States feels quite calm in the Mediterranean with complete military superiority, in the presence of ANY airdromes (you have doubts that they will not be able to use Greek or Italian, if they need to drive F22 there or whatever they want?), In the presence of AUGs, in the presence of any necessary infrastructure and everything else that they need for complete happiness. request
              As they say do not say gop until you jumped. When they are trampled from NATO and called the union New Europe or something like that, then yes, but for now it’s only FANTASY. Therefore, I say, we will not fantasize, but let's proceed from the real situation for today.
            6. 0
              11 October 2016 01: 42
              Quote: Hunter
              the country's leadership will finally understand that it is necessary to build Ships of the first and second rank!

              What for?
              What time should I step on the mop? And then, is it absolutely necessary to step on this mop? No way without it?
          2. +2
            11 October 2016 10: 50
            Quote: DarkMatter
            The conversation was that the United States will not be able to poke its head in Middle-earth, and not about World War 3. There is a small difference, it seems

            ... not really ... remember a colleague cniza ...
            Let the "exceptional" rejoice and understand that they have nothing to catch in the Mediterranean.
            ... in part, he’s right ... he won’t be able to hang out in the pool any more ... if you read the article correctly and simply put it bluntly on military terms: ... preparing an operational airfield for deploying a tactical air group ... with these forces and the composition of what means ... this is already more visible than the General Staff of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation ... and there will be no local war in Middle East, it will be the third world war ... to which Europe will not subscribe under any circumstances ...
            Quote: DarkMatter
            However, now we have everything the same as 10 years ago.

            ... if that were so ... then Syria would have suffered the fate of Iraq and Libya ... and a star-striped rag would have developed in Crimea ... but somehow it’s all wrong ... isn't it? ... according to the information of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation:
            According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, from September 30, 2015, the air forces of the aerospace forces inflicted 16,2 thousand attacks on terrorist targets in Syria for 53,9 thousand sorties.
            It is clarified that as a result of VKS attacks, more than 35 thousand militants were eliminated, of which 267 people were leaders of armed groups.
            In addition, the agency said that Russian aviation destroyed 675 terrorist training camps.

            Also, from September 30, aviation of the US Air Force and coalition countries performed 7,9 thousand sorties. The Ministry of Defense noted that as a result of the attacks, three bridges across the Euphrates River were used, used by local residents, the power substation in Aleppo, the Doctors Without Borders hospital, the positions of government troops in the city of Deir ez-Zor (62 were killed and more than 100 Syrian wounded military personnel), 20 garden houses in southern Syria near the border with Jordan and a significant number of other civilian infrastructure in Syria.
            ... 16,2 thousand sorties of the Russian Aerospace Forces and 7,9 thousand of the US and Co Air Force with amazing results ... bully
            Quote: DarkMatter
            The United States feels quite calm in the Mediterranean with complete military superiority, in the presence of ANY aerodromes (you have doubts that they will not be able to use Greek or Italian, if they need to drive F22 there or whatever they want?), In the presence of AUGs, in the presence of any necessary infrastructure and everything else that they need for complete happiness.

            ... there are no airfields of any kind ... I have already analyzed it above ... and, about the F-22 and F-35 ... Konashenkov expressed himself very succinctly about "naive amateurs hoping for stealth" and he is right ... AUG, as I have written more than once ... not a wunderwaffle ... but, even more so, two locked in a square of 700x700 km. ... map ... you don’t maneuver here especially ... or the range of carrier-based aviation is simply not enough ... wink
            .... and there are 6th fleet bases there are only 4re one fuel and lubricants and MTO:
            Navy La Spezia - Italian Naval Warfare in the Tyrrhenian Sea - surface ships
            Navy Augusta - located on the southeast coast of about. Sicily - the base of fuel and lubricants and MTO
            Navy Naples - surface ships
            Navy Gaeta - the forefront base of the 6th fleet
            Navy La Maddalena - a submarine floating base and one or three American multi-purpose submarines are based
            ... but for every tricky nut, there is a bolt with a left-hand thread ... hi
            Quote: DarkMatter
            As they say do not say gop until you jumped. When they are trampled from NATO and called the union New Europe or something like that, then yes, but for now it’s only FANTASY. Therefore, I say, we will not fantasize, but let's proceed from the real situation for today.

            ... but I don’t see any reason to hide under the bed ... well, here’s a noble movement in Europe that will be noble and will only accelerate further ... hi
            1. 0
              11 October 2016 23: 30
              What will we stop them from floundering about? Will we attack their ships and planes on the first successful occasion? I do not understand what the conversation is about.
              I do not see where the analysis of airfields. Wherever they want, they will fly there, and if anyone in Greece or elsewhere arises, then the Americans accidentally find some debts or shortcomings in the banking system and invoice 5-10 billion dollars by chance, as they did with France when they they didn’t want to break the Mistral contract, then shut up and did as Uncle Sam ordered.
              So the operational space and space for maneuver is GRAND, in contrast to our one hypothetical base, the coordinates of which are already known to everyone right now. So how many planes will be able to accommodate so much will be. And the Americans will be able to drive their how many NECESSARY, feel the difference.
              The same is true for ships, we simply physically do not have as many ships in all fleets as they can put up if situations really are not in their favor and need strengthening.

              And don’t give a damn what Konashenkov said, what does it have to do with it? In our conversation we did not mention "invisibility" at all, which is complete nonsense. The conversation was about the fact that the Americans will be able to ensure the presence of the most modern aircraft, in the required quantity. And whoever thinks F35 is a superpuper or a wunderwolf is their business, just like whoever considers them a trough, it's not about this at all, I don't even want to touch this topic, otherwise the smell will not be pleasant wassat
              AUGs will be able to maneuver as they please and no one will do anything to them, because if they shoot, then the very war you wrote about will begin. Moreover, in order to break through their collective defense, you will need either Zircon, which no one has yet seen, or the number of missiles that we have been able to put in a certain place at a certain time. Moreover, if we take into account their aviation from the ground, as well as AWACS, etc., it is completely sad.

              How can I get to not climb out of the bay and not take off from air bases many times superior I still do not understand the forces that have room for maneuver, to change the deployment, which are actually located on their territory by the forces of 1-2 airfields and many times fewer ships (and of a weaker class).

              In the same way, I don’t understand where does the number of women killed. Let's talk about the growth of milk yield in Ryazan laughing

              I didn’t offer to hide, in any case!
              But you don’t need to write stupidity either, that victory is behind the belt and all the Yankees are running, the heels are sparkling, this is absolutely not so! Yes, they will take some measures. Yes, it will keep them in some sort of tone, the contact line will advance south. But this does not mean that the moment has come.
              P.S. we’ll see about the movement in Europe, I really want to hope that the truth will change something ...
          3. 0
            12 October 2016 09: 41
            how many faithful allies and vassals, ready to rush to slaughter at the first successful occasion. Count, then think, estimate.
            Do you really think that someone will fit into the batch for the interests of the "exceptional". I doubt it! wink
      2. +1
        10 October 2016 10: 31
        I heard that Egypt wants to give us these "mistrals", who will say so or not?
        1. +1
          10 October 2016 11: 30
          Quote: Dreiko11
          Dreiko11 Today, 10:31 ↑
          I heard that Egypt wants to give us these "mistrals", who will say so or not?



          Mistrals were bought with Saudi money, so Egypt is their only nominal owner ...
        2. 0
          10 October 2016 12: 17
          If you heard, then what to ask again - deaf or he invented?
        3. 0
          10 October 2016 13: 37
          I have not heard about this, but in principle, resale of Mistral is possible
    2. +25
      10 October 2016 09: 11
      Quote: Hunter
      Good news!

      That's for sure, now experts from Israel will come to the forum and will dissuade us from this step. wink But we will explain to them that this is against Somali pirates. Yes But the base in Syria and the base in Egypt are very necessary. Yes
      1. +10
        10 October 2016 10: 11
        "experts from Israel will come and dissuade us from this step" ////

        Why dissuade? Do you know how much the maintenance of the databases costs?
        Yes, even in every Arab country build. All this will result in technology
        at the joke without repairs, spare parts and kerosene.

        Geopolitics needs a lot, a lot of money. Americans know this, not without reason
        Obama has closed half of the bases in Europe.
        1. +9
          10 October 2016 10: 27
          Yes, it’s not any more expensive than on Novaya Zemlya, or any along the NSR, well, the Merikos has an extra bad tooth soldier for exclusivity ...
          1. +4
            10 October 2016 11: 52
            1 Our engineers made a humanoid robot. The video is impressive - the synth is not moving very fast so far, but its movements are really similar to human ones. By the way, do not frantically twist the sound knob on the speakers, there is no sound in the video for the first two minutes.

            Although the robot Fyodor is officially called "the astronaut's assistant", the video shows elements of combat training - the robot vigorously opposes a soldier with a training spear, wields something similar to a flamethrower and does push-ups on his fists. The serious expressions on the faces of scientists confirm the military direction of research.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkjF-dem7Ug
            To put such Fedorov in the old tanks. How many old tanks are there in reserve? Thousand 20?
            Yes, at the bases, on guard.
            Who wants to check what they are capable of, Russians?
        2. +7
          10 October 2016 10: 30
          winked the maintenance of Israel is more expensive
          1. +2
            10 October 2016 11: 05
            Quote: Shark Lover
            winked the maintenance of Israel is more expensive

            Russia? wassat
            1. +2
              10 October 2016 23: 39
              Quote: Aron Zaavi
              Russia?

              ... and Russia too ... although there is mutual gesheft ... Israel has Leviathan ... Russia has Gazprom and delivery routes to Europe ... as I recall, they signed an agreement ... there is both the Cyprus section and the Lebanese business they’ll go, and even the Syrian shelf is not touched by exploration ... so it’s better to mine and trade peacefully than to fight cool ... isn’t it? ... hi
        3. +3
          10 October 2016 10: 36

          Geopolitics needs a lot, a lot of money. Americans know this, not without reason
          Obama has closed half of the bases in Europe.
          Dear colleague, do not compare us with the United States. Corruption and theft, no matter how much the Western media shouted at us less than theirs. We do not have official lobbying, and besides, the cost of maintenance is not comparable with the United States and by several orders of magnitude! But I do not consider, as some, that it is against Israel, why we now have some of the most trusting relations. drinks
        4. +5
          10 October 2016 11: 04
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Do you know how much the maintenance of the databases costs?

          As they wrote on the Star today
          There is also the financial side of the issue. The maintenance of bases in Kamrani and Luders even in Soviet times was not cheap - the bill went to hundreds of millions of dollars. Now such expenses are not pledged. And, say, no one plans to deploy an air division in Vietnam, just like the missile division in Cuba. Only infrastructure and security and safety systems. They too are expensive. But they are worth it!

          And at the expense of Lourdes. One electronic intelligence center in the underbelly will cost less than a couple - three additional Voronezh with a space constellation.
          So save more hi
        5. 0
          10 October 2016 13: 47
          Warrior wow, if I understand you correctly: Russians do not need military bases.
          SK, to you, the warrior, uh, recommends giving money to the Lyalka.
          And can you open a base for you, you will not begin to tear three skins out of friendship?
        6. 0
          10 October 2016 16: 56
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Geopolitics needs a lot, a lot of money. Americans know this, not without reason

          we do not need 700 bases
      2. 0
        10 October 2016 10: 45
        The above experts, by and large, on the drum, where our airbases will be.
  2. +14
    10 October 2016 08: 56
    That's right, the time of "partnership" is over, you need to be able to fry the backs of your "former partners" from the south
  3. +27
    10 October 2016 08: 58
    This is really great! We would still have to restore the base in Cuba, it would not have a price. And bases in Vietnam, Panama and Venezuela would not hurt. I can imagine what screech will rise in the USA if we agree with Cuba, and I think there is such a possibility.
    1. +4
      10 October 2016 09: 06
      Quote: Diana Ilyina
      We would still have to restore the base in Cuba, it would not have a price. And bases in Vietnam, Panama and Venezuela would not hurt.

      What for? And at what expense?
      Quote: Diana Ilyina
      I can imagine what screech will rise in the USA if we agree with Cuba

      None will rise. Because they understand perfectly well that "socialism" in Cuba is alive (and any bases except the American ones) while Fidel is alive. And he is no longer young and certainly not eternal.
      1. +5
        10 October 2016 09: 25
        Quote: rjxtufh
        What for? And at what expense?

        Firstly, why, then what you know is not supposed to.
        Secondly, none of your business.
        Thirdly, do not consider pennies in someone else's pocket - this is the lot of the poor.
        Gaul and so recently with his Hollande shows a pattern of stupidity.
        Quote: rjxtufh
        Because they understand perfectly well that "socialism" in Cuba is alive (and any bases except the American ones) while Fidel is alive.

        And this is not for you to discuss, Cuba is not your satellite and is not going to give up its development path, you are there in general, you have no voting right, together with the United Gang of Aggressors.
      2. +12
        10 October 2016 09: 29
        rjxtufh Today, 09:06 ↑
        What for?
        Then why do Americans need bases around the world.
        And at what expense?
        Don’t worry, there will be enough funds for one base in Cuba.
        None will rise. Because they understand perfectly well that "socialism" in Cuba is alive (and any bases except the American ones) while Fidel is alive. And he is no longer young and certainly not eternal.
        Who told you that ?! Your American masters ?!
        You dumped in France, and here you sit there silently and wind the snot on your fist. Russia without your snot will figure out what and where to place it.
        1. 0
          10 October 2016 18: 24
          About Cuba in vain attacked a comrade. I will anticipate the question “Who told you this ?!” and I will answer that the Cubans. If in the short term things will go well, of course, in the medium term, and even more so in the long term, things are not so rosy. Now the so-called American way of life and American values ​​are being imposed on children and youth in Cuba at a rapid pace. So when Fidel, Raul and other people of their or middle age leave the army and politics, then those who now dream of living in the USA will come, listen to music, watch American sports, and so on. So we can overlook everything again, the example of Ukraine is indicative. Moreover, we must not forget that the United States is close to Cuba, and this is also an important factor.
          P.S. Many Cubans were extremely surprised and upset by the closure of our base in Lourdes. For example, I had the honor of talking with one retired officer, told a lot of interesting things about how I flew on business trips to the USSR, how I saw the first snow wassat In general, he kept asking me how, well, why and why Putin closed the base, I could not find a satisfying answer ...

          So if we want to, then in Cuba now, I emphasize now, the base can be returned. A question of necessity (not a sofa, but a real one) and a question of price on the agenda.

          P.S. Of course the screech rises grandiose. But not because they are always afraid or always anxious))
          This is an element of the information war and they will ALWAYS raise a squeal, and if there is no reason, they will come up with them! The pressure is and will continue to go along the lines of the media, so I am surprised at the thought there will be a squeal, it won’t, it’s obvious!
        2. 0
          10 October 2016 22: 02
          Quote: Diana Ilyina
          Then why do Americans need bases around the world.

          "Stretch your legs over your clothes." The proverb is as follows. Sometimes it is useful to re-read them (proverbs).
          Quote: Diana Ilyina
          Don’t worry, there will be enough funds for one base in Cuba.

          That's enough for 10. The question is, due to what and to whom?
          Quote: Diana Ilyina
          Your American masters ?!

          No, your American masters.
          Quote: Diana Ilyina
          here and sit there silently and wind the snot on a fist. Russia without your snot will figure out what and where to place it.

          Are you Russia? How many do you take on?
          Well, snot on a fist ... You should not try on your habits with others.
    2. +2
      10 October 2016 09: 07
      At whose expense will all this be? And there’s not so much technology ...
    3. +4
      10 October 2016 11: 08
      Quote: Diana Ilyina
      This is really great! We would still have to restore the base in Cuba, it would not have a price. And bases in Vietnam, Panama and Venezuela would not hurt. I can imagine what screech will rise in the USA if we agree with Cuba, and I think there is such a possibility.

      Any whim for your money. As soon as Russia finds an extra 180 billion rubles a year in its budget to compensate Egypt for the cessation of American aid, it will immediately lease a military base to you. And even two. Just pay.
      1. +10
        10 October 2016 11: 41
        Any whim for your money
        Do not fart into a puddle and do not count money in other people's pockets. This base is like a Faberge sickle to the Israelis!
        I’m wondering when the hegemon will not be up to you, and this is likely to happen soon, how will you keep the Golan ?! Apparently, Russia in Syria, if not forever, then for a very, very long time. And if it happens that the Kremlin decides to support Assad in a claim, moreover, a legitimate claim, to return the Syrian Golan Heights, how much time will Israel be able to keep them in hours ?!
        1. +1
          10 October 2016 12: 45
          Quote: Diana Ilyina
          Any whim for your money
          Do not fart into a puddle and do not count money in other people's pockets. This base is like a Faberge sickle to the Israelis!
          I’m wondering when the hegemon will not be up to you, and this is likely to happen soon, how will you keep the Golan ?! Apparently, Russia in Syria, if not forever, then for a very, very long time. And if it happens that the Kremlin decides to support Assad in a claim, moreover, a legitimate claim, to return the Syrian Golan Heights, how much time will Israel be able to keep them in hours ?!
          "The crown of creation, wondrous Diana ..", do not frown, wrinkles will appear. To us from your bases, in Syria, in Egypt, does not blow. Well, there were bases there, and not Russia, but the USSR, so what?
          As for support, we will have it under the contract for the next 10 years. But as for Kremoy’s support of Damascus in the b / d against Israel, that was already so. In 67/73 / 82gg. Well, where are the Golan? But the USSR was more powerful than Russia. One thing only changed. Israel was much weaker then. So everything will be fine with us.
      2. 0
        10 October 2016 22: 04
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        As soon as Russia finds an extra 180 billion rubles a year in its budget to compensate Egypt for the cessation of American aid,

        A holy place is never empty. China may take the US place, and we will provide armed support as military assistance. Although, I think, statements on the base in Egypt are a strengthening of the negotiating position.
    4. +1
      10 October 2016 11: 29
      Panama You in vain dragged here. A country artificially created by the Americans.
      1. +8
        10 October 2016 11: 44
        Igor In Today, 11: 29 ↑
        Panama You in vain dragged here. A country artificially created by the Americans.
        Nothing is impossible in the world, this is first. And secondly, not necessarily in Panama, Nicaragua will do too!
    5. 0
      10 October 2016 13: 57
      Dear Dina, your wishes are wonderful, but about mani-mani.
      Lourdos alone (with a modern filling, a splinter in one place for "d well-wishers", and the technical base of the Navy in Kamran is a large teal in the same place
  4. +6
    10 October 2016 09: 01
    Well, the Arabs, to put it mildly, also have seven Fridays a week. Therefore, if you plan to place the base in a country, then you need to take into account the capabilities of the authorities in this country. And then you’ll settle in, in a week another square will happen, others will come and begin to point a finger at the door. And do not forget about the exceptional nation, which even in my toilet may have national interests. They will immediately begin to build any obstacles without reckoning with any laws and opinions. hi
  5. +2
    10 October 2016 09: 02
    There is one thing I don't like about this all. Usually, we learned about the appearance of such a base of ours at the moment of its actual appearance, that is, when our planes or ships were ALREADY there. Here I only see that our side has very strongly activated its actions in the search for new bases around the globe, making the main effort to restore its presence where the Soviet bases were previously located. Well, history has proved once again that "Si vis pacem, para bellum"
  6. 0
    10 October 2016 09: 06
    And the Egyptians will be able to specifically apply the Mistral. Most likely they will take an active part in Libya.
    1. +1
      10 October 2016 09: 14
      Quote: SHVEDsky_stol
      And the Egyptians will be able to specifically apply the Mistral. Most likely they will take an active part in Libya.

      Or in an intervention in Yemen, where their troops also take part.
  7. +3
    10 October 2016 09: 10
    And then pyramid pyramid, etc. etc. laughing
    First, Egypt needs to ask its own military how they will compensate them with $ 4 billion in annual military assistance from the United States to their own military love
    1. +7
      10 October 2016 09: 26
      Quote: MarioG
      First, Egypt needs to ask its own military how they will compensate them with 4 billion dollars

      America has already compensated you?
      They would have been silent ... forever as you run around with outstretched hands .. give, give, hurt ...
      1. 0
        10 October 2016 14: 51
        The bloodsucker coined a new term in world politics, ah young man, take a pie from the shelf, I allow. Joker.
        1. 0
          10 October 2016 14: 56
          I allow you to drink rotten kefir, to bite a moldy piece of matzah before last, and then, sitting in a famous place, not to touch the computer keyboard due to the complete uselessness and inadequacy of judgment.
          Do you deny receiving US $ 30 billion in bailout over the next 10 years, with annual payments of at least 3,4 billion?
          Do you still deny your current payments from Germany?
  8. +1
    10 October 2016 09: 12
    Yes, you can poke around the world bases like the Americans, only where is the money Zin?
    1. +4
      10 October 2016 10: 35
      Why is everything so baked about our money ????? Throw it, if you are so worried angry Who needs it, he thinks, I think, thinks not bad, that means there is where, besides zing)))). Yes, don’t worry about my salary, either, and retirement, it’s even enough and I pay all taxes. Even the crests, over there, were worried.
  9. +2
    10 October 2016 09: 16
    Russia has far-reaching plans. If only it were not like the Soviet Union to realize them, it would seem like making friends and receiving money, it’s a lot, but how to draw shit with a spoon, so mother Russia alone gets more than ..
  10. +1
    10 October 2016 09: 18
    Well done !!! Keep it up. Cuba and Vietnam must be "spud".
  11. +3
    10 October 2016 09: 19
    The Mediterranean air of Sidi Barrani will be the best for our VKS military personnel. It is necessary to open health resorts somewhere else!
  12. 0
    10 October 2016 09: 23
    In general, Egypt is an unstable country. It wouldn’t work out the same way as with Sadat. Putin has a good relationship with Al-Sisi. And who will replace him?
  13. +3
    10 October 2016 09: 25
    “To solve geopolitical problems in the conditions of serious instability of the region”

    Finally waited. The time has come when Russia again remembered about its former bases. So there is gunpowder in the flasks for this. Already hear the long whining from across the ocean.
  14. 0
    10 October 2016 09: 26
    It’s right to create bases on the basis of ours, on a campaign of the matter - exactly our Mistrals, or vice versa, but all the same everything will be hurt !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! am
  15. 0
    10 October 2016 09: 27
    Hooray!!! We return to our old places of deployment, we can only welcome this progressive process. We must be where we were !!!
    1. 0
      10 October 2016 11: 24
      what for? what is the benefit?
      1. +1
        10 October 2016 11: 43
        Read
        http://newsdiscover.net/news/read/Vossozdanie_voe
        nnyh_baz_Rossii_za_rubezhom_dolzhno_byt_opravdano
        _strategic.html
        Anything more interesting than the opuses of the Professor and his clientele.
  16. +2
    10 October 2016 09: 38
    Yeah. Base. Now Egypt will give up American military and economic assistance and turn to Russia.
    https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33003.pdf

    1. avt
      +5
      10 October 2016 09: 56
      Quote: professor
      Egypt will refuse American military and economic assistance and turn towards Russia.

      laughing A Jew came and debased everything by counting money. laughing All buzz ryapotsriotam broke off!laughing
      Quote: masiya
      Hooray!!! We return to our old places of deployment, we can only welcome this progressive process. We must be where we were !!!

      That's right, spit on gentle souls! ..... Out of envy, the professor is angry! He’s talking about high feelings, and he’s talking about money. That's because there is no Russian base in Israel. wassat I see no other reason bully Not, well, actually, not because I really counted the money.
      1. +4
        10 October 2016 10: 53
        Quote: avt
        A Jew came and debased everything by counting money. All buzz ryapotsriotam broke off!

        Do you think Arabs are friends for the sake of ideology, and not for money? wink

        Quote: avt
        That's because in Israel there is no Russian base

        How is it not? But am I a fighter on the couch front? laughing
        1. avt
          +1
          10 October 2016 12: 11
          Quote: professor
          Do you think Arabs are friends for the sake of ideology, and not for money?

          Again these
          Quote: The Bloodthirster
          Anything more interesting than the opuses of the Professor and his clientele.

          laughing Here we can say the second coming of the Khrushchev building of socialism in the fraternal Arab folk (then it dried up laughing ) republics, monarchies (well, in the Jordan laughing ) and even hell knows what loomed there.
          Quote: professor
          Although it all depends on who will be seated on the throne.

          Yes la-a-ah-bottom! There Anwar Sadat pereobulsya on the fly capturing usovskih grandmother and nothing ..... or what? wassat Well, in the sense - how is it? Really popper then the USSR from Alexandria and now something about the return is in question? wassat Moreover, it has very dim prospects and it looks like the Egyptians were twisting Russian hands with tourism. Is trade in the East an engine of progress ?? Isn’t that the cursed professor right with his grandmother count !? wassat bully Here another thing is more interesting - while we are in the Levant struggling in dreams of the past, the Chinese have quite gotten used to themselves on the East coast of Africa. And we, having offended Fidel and his Kuban, who really paid with blood for the interests of the USSR in Africa, we even forgot about Angola, Namibia request Although the position is still quite realizable! So, just in case, in not very fat years, almost exactly after the war, the USSR government found money for a presence, and large-scale in Antarctica.
        2. 0
          10 October 2016 19: 46
          And would you be friends with anyone who does coups in your country, or with a longtime ally?
    2. +1
      10 October 2016 10: 10
      What is the difference in the degree of rotation of modern Egyptians?
      They are wise for their many thousands of years of experience:
      1. 0
        10 October 2016 15: 47
        [quote = dumpy15] What is the difference in the degree of rotation of modern Egyptians?
        They are wise for their many thousands of years of experience:
        [/ There is a difference, how many descendants of the Egyptians who built the pyramids remained? Modern inhabitants are Arabs, invaders who came from the Arabian Peninsula,
    3. +2
      10 October 2016 10: 51
      Professor, it’s interesting to read your comments, always backed up by numbers, justified from somewhere, do you trust open sources? (I mean interesting without sarcasm) It is naive for a Jew.
      For instance. I have an income of 200 rubles a month, I declare it to the whole family, relatives, and other organizations. But 000-2 times a year I make all sorts of mischievous trips in the Russian Federation, from the Far East to the European part, to Altai, etc. In addition, once a month we arrange stag parties with childhood friends, all these funds are not taken from the family BDS. Where does it come from? If I, far from being a financier, can turn such tricks, then the leadership of the country is much more mature.
      Even if Egypt refuses, that is not the issue. About 10 years ago it was even funny to talk about it. And now they are writing in the press, imagine that in another 10 years there will be love
      1. 0
        10 October 2016 11: 30
        Quote: Shark Lover
        do you trust open sources?

        I trust the report of the US Congress on where they direct money. Do you have other data?

        Quote: Shark Lover
        For instance. I have an income of 200 rubles a month, I declare it to the whole family, relatives, and other organizations. But 000-2 times a year I make all sorts of mischievous trips in the Russian Federation, from the Far East to the European part, to Altai, etc. In addition, once a month we arrange stag parties with childhood friends, all these funds are not taken from the family BDS. Where does it come from? If I, far from being a financier, can turn such tricks, then the leadership of the country is much more mature.

        The US Congress also has funding for "closed projects". This has nothing to do with the situation under discussion.

        Quote: Shark Lover
        Even if Egypt refuses, that is not the issue. About 10 years ago it was even funny to talk about it. And now they are writing in the press, imagine that in another 10 years there will be

        Yeah. It’s scary to imagine what the press will write about. laughing Although it all depends on who will be seated on the throne.
  17. 0
    10 October 2016 09: 47
    Maybe you should not advertise such arrangements ahead of time?
    But it somehow didn’t work out well with Iran ...
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. +1
    10 October 2016 09: 50
    As always, the keyword 'may "! Let's wait until it appears exactly, if we wait.
  20. 0
    10 October 2016 10: 11
    Good news. I hope that everything works out. soldier
  21. 0
    10 October 2016 10: 20
    This is a very expensive business base abroad, well, soooooooo. 100 times you need to think before posting something.
    I won’t say anything about Egypt, but the fact that we need bases in America is clear. Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba, of course, where without it.
    No matter how you tear yourself up, Russia is not yet the USSR, alas ..
  22. +2
    10 October 2016 10: 50
    great news, the closer the relations of the Arabs and Russia, the better the relations of Israel with the United States and Europe. Everything is like in the warm 70-80s.
    1. 0
      10 October 2016 10: 58
      Quote: Kaiten
      great news

      To promise this does not mean to marry. wink
  23. 0
    10 October 2016 11: 04
    US Military Assistance Clients in 2017:
    (Near and Middle East as a potential theater of operations)
  24. +1
    10 October 2016 11: 22
    in all these dances around military bases in the Middle East, the final meaning, purpose of creation, remains unclear to me.
    in Syria, we need bases to protect Assad. and we need Assad so that we have legitimate bases in Syria. and further around, the priest had a dog ...
    What is the economic background of these bases?
    protect our merchant ships? disappears, nothing threatens navigation in the middle-earth.
    protect your shores? we don’t have them there.
    attack foreign merchant ships and foreign coast? it would be nice to fill up a galleon with a gold coin and slaves on the islands, but it seems like not the 17th century.
    Ponte remains, it’s also a good thing, but when there’s nowhere to put money, it’s not our situation.
    1. +2
      10 October 2016 11: 30
      Why do you think the United Kingdom contains Gibraltar’s naval base, although it could long ago have given Rock to Spain for maintenance, and the United States Guantanamo Bay and dozens of the largest naval and air force bases thousands of kilometers from the metropolis? Alone show off?
  25. +2
    10 October 2016 11: 27
    "A Russian military base may appear in Egypt"...

    Another round of spiral development of history ... We are recovering the positions we have lost ...
    On the one hand, there is joy ... On the other hand, Egypt is such a "benevolent ally." that there is nowhere to put the stigma ... In Soviet times, like a vacuum cleaner rocked and rocked, and then - betrayed ...
    Well, for the rent, I think, will ask a lot ...
    In general, the glass is half empty and half full ...
  26. +1
    10 October 2016 11: 52
    1 Our engineers made a humanoid robot. The video is impressive - the synth is not moving very fast so far, but its movements are really similar to human ones. By the way, do not frantically twist the sound knob on the speakers, there is no sound in the video for the first two minutes.

    Although the robot Fyodor is officially called "the astronaut's assistant", the video shows elements of combat training - the robot vigorously opposes a soldier with a training spear, wields something similar to a flamethrower and does push-ups on his fists. The serious expressions on the faces of scientists confirm the military direction of research.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkjF-dem7Ug
    To put such Fedorov in the old tanks. How many old tanks are there in reserve? Thousand 20?
    Yes, at the bases, on guard.
    Who wants to check what they are capable of, Russians?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9mUoRdO86Y
  27. 0
    10 October 2016 11: 56
    I think it’s much more useful to focus on Cuba! Egypt is a corrupt country ...
  28. 0
    10 October 2016 12: 23
    Finally, we understood that it doesn't matter how the air was spoiled, the main thing is that it stinks and for as long as possible. They have too much information space, which is mainly aimed at throwing out blatant fakes in Syria, so we need to fill part of this space according to our scenario - let them suck on our "candy"!
  29. +2
    10 October 2016 13: 24
    And it’s right and desirable on the canal laughing
  30. cap
    0
    10 October 2016 14: 48
    I believe that cooperation with Egypt should be established, this also applies to the joint restoration of the air base, ”the parliamentarian said.

    I think so too hi
    Perfect solution !
  31. 0
    10 October 2016 19: 18
    Correct solution. And timely. It is necessary to defend against robbers by building advanced outposts on trade routes.
    I can imagine what a howl will now begin in a swamp of cheese-cheese rotten apples and other riffraffs!
  32. 0
    10 October 2016 21: 23
    Egyptian Presidential Executive Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi Al Yussef refuted information on the possible deployment of a Russian military base in Egypt.

    Read the details on UNIAN: http://www.unian.net/world/1565077-egipet-proyavi
    l-svoyu-tverduyu-pozitsiyu-nikakih-rossiyskih-baz
    -zdes-ne-budet.html

    So that all "worried about the budget" can calmly exhale. We will not be in Egypt, it is not in the interests of the United States and Saudi Arabia, the main sponsors of military assistance to Egypt.
  33. 0
    10 October 2016 21: 27
    Quote: Diana Ilyina
    Apparently, Russia in Syria, if not forever, then for a very, very long time.

    Apparently, Russia in Syria is not forever, but Assad is in power for now. And in this case, not 100%.
  34. 0
    10 October 2016 23: 17
    Quote: Igor V
    In-in, somewhere else in Venezuela or Nicaragua.

    In-in. Especially in Venezuela. That's where the dough drank will be

    Quote: Diana Ilyina
    This is really great! We would still have to restore the base in Cuba, it would not have a price. And bases in Vietnam, Panama and Venezuela would not hurt. I can imagine what screech will rise in the USA if we agree with Cuba, and I think there is such a possibility.

    The price for this would be oh so great. If the year of the operation in Syria cost us almost 60 billion rubles, and this despite the fact that we didn’t create practically any infrastructure there, then such bases “on the sidelines” will cost the country an order of magnitude more.
    Base in Panama? But will the Panamanians want to have her there?
    Base in Venezuela? An indiscreet question, but what for, what will it give us there, what is the benefit?
    Base in Cuba? The maximum that Raul can agree to, kmk, is to restore the base in Lourdes and to periodically land our strategists in AB Cuba.

    Raul is a pragmatist, he understands that Russia is not the USSR. It does not possess such resources and in the event of another blockade it is unlikely to be able to help Cuba.

    So I'm afraid it's only a dream to have bases in several countries at once.

    Quote: Aron Zaavi
    Any whim for your money. As soon as Russia finds an extra 180 billion rubles a year in its budget to compensate Egypt for the cessation of American aid, it will immediately lease a military base to you. And even two. Just pay.

    Tough, but to the point. Comrades, do not think that everyone is eager to provide us with bases. For this you have to pay a lot of money.
  35. 0
    10 October 2016 23: 50
    Inok10,
    Namesake, RTOs - offensive weapons, the first shot, and then "well, comrades, all in their places ...", I understand your calculations, just think about the combined air defense system in this situation, rather a plus than a minus! Anyway, my comment, about something else, I know who the Fleet killed, and the uki live well, I really want the situation to change.
  36. The comment was deleted.
  37. The comment was deleted.
  38. 0
    11 October 2016 04: 29
    I’d better keep quiet, but the news is very good. Control at the approaches is the state’s security strategy.
  39. 0
    11 October 2016 10: 18
    Assad’s policy of support, the disposal of old air bombs in areas politically convenient for training flight personnel, is beginning to bear fruit.
  40. 0
    11 October 2016 19: 43
    Super! It will be very good
  41. 0
    12 October 2016 08: 50
    Quote: cniza
    Let the "exceptional" rejoice and understand that they have nothing to catch in the Mediterranean.

    They hung around there when the most powerful fifth OPESK existed, and then we began to indicate our presence in the BV a bit, and you already got into a fuss! It’s ridiculous to God, until those little mercenaries have nothing to do there oh how far!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"