Military Review

Neither French nor Russian resolutions on Syria were adopted in the UN Security Council

79
Russia has blocked in the UN Security Council proposed by France a resolution on Syria, providing for the introduction of a ceasefire in Aleppo, reports RIA News.




The draft document was supported by 11 votes. Two representatives voted against, and two permanent members of the UN Security Council abstained. Russia applied the right of veto, and the project was blocked.

“The draft resolution is not adopted because the permanent member of the UN Security Council voted against it,” said permanent representative Vitaly Churkin.

On the eve Churkin said that the French version of the resolution has no chance of adoption.

“On October 8, the Russian Federation voted against the draft UN Security Council resolution prepared by France on the situation in Syria. His text, which was clearly presented when indulging in Washington immediately after the United States refused to comply with the Russian-American agreements on a Syrian settlement, grossly distorted the real state of affairs, was politicized, unbalanced and one-sided, ”the Russian Foreign Ministry said.

It is noted that "all the blame for the escalation of tension in the SAR in the project indiscriminately placed on the authorities of the country."

“At the same time, a frank attempt was made by banning flights aviation in the Aleppo region, to provide cover for the Jabhat al-Nusra terrorists and the militants who merged with them, despite the obligations of UN member states to fight the terrorist threat with all available means, ”the department explained.

The Russian draft resolution put to vote was also not adopted.

“The project is not accepted because the required number of votes was not cast for it,” Churkin said yesterday.

The document was voted 2 of the five permanent members - the Russian Federation and China. The project was also supported by Venezuela and Egypt. Abstained Angola and Uruguay.

The Russian resolution supported the initiative of Special Envoy for Syria, Staffan de Mistura, to withdraw militants from Aleppo, and also called for the fulfillment of the agreements of the Russian Federation and the United States on Syria from September 9.

After Russia blocked the French resolution, British permanent representative Matthew Rycroft stated that "the veto imposed by Russia did not leave the possibility of forming unity in the Security Council." He called this step "the cynical abuse of the privileges and responsibilities of a permanent member of the UN Security Council."

"The representative of the United Kingdom pathetically exclaimed:" Stop (air strikes) now. " Indeed, stop now supporting a different rabble around the world - extremists, terrorists and various other lovers of the situation in this or that country. In general, stop interfering in the affairs of other sovereign states, leave these colonial habits, leave the world alone. And then the situation will improve in so many areas and areas of light ",
declared Vitaly Churkin.
Photos used:
Flickr MFA of Russia
79 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dryuya2
    Dryuya2 9 October 2016 08: 36
    +10
    maybe someone will be interested
    UN Security Council meeting on Syria
    1. The black
      The black 9 October 2016 08: 47
      +30
      By forcing the United States and its allies to use the veto over an alternative draft resolution submitted by Russia to the UN Security Council on Aleppo, Russia will show the world that the Western coalition, led by Fashington, is fighting on the side of the terrorists.

      And by and large all this garbage, men. As long as this pro-American brotherhood does not get rid of the Russian bear by a vile hare, this scum wanted to sneeze at our diplomatic steps and resolutions. These nits will think of something else.
      1. Mushroom
        Mushroom 9 October 2016 09: 07
        +5
        and cho? -about this and so everyone knows the main thing so that in France and Germany nothing more explodes, it will be necessary to remind us who the boss is. right now there will be a lot of fun when we will be deprived of the veto and will be deprived!
        1. arane
          arane 9 October 2016 09: 18
          0
          Quote: Mushroom
          and cho? -about this and so everyone knows the main thing so that in France and Germany nothing more explodes, it will be necessary to remind us who the boss is. right now there will be a lot of fun when we will be deprived of the veto and will be deprived!

          I do not know how, but they will come up with and deprive. Maybe they will amend the UN charter. You can safely leave this pass.
          1. forester
            forester 9 October 2016 09: 56
            +3
            Quote: arane
            Quote: Mushroom
            and cho? -about this and so everyone knows the main thing so that in France and Germany nothing more explodes, it will be necessary to remind us who the boss is. right now there will be a lot of fun when we will be deprived of the veto and will be deprived!

            I do not know how, but they will come up with and deprive. Maybe they will amend the UN charter. You can safely leave this pass.

            Something tells me that we will also put a veto on it - the letter X
          2. mr.redpartizan
            mr.redpartizan 9 October 2016 10: 49
            +2
            If Russia is excluded from the UN Security Council (which is impossible without its legal consent), then a new world war will become inevitable. States will no longer be bound even by formal restrictions.
          3. Mushroom
            Mushroom 9 October 2016 11: 04
            0
            it’s not a matter of getting out of it, but what they will do without us, and they will file a petition in the Hague court on crimes against humanity with all the consequences for those who are filed and for those who file and sign
          4. Stanislas
            Stanislas 10 October 2016 00: 39
            0
            Quote: arane
            Maybe they will amend the UN charter.
            What's the point? The veto of Russia is the notorious red line or line, as they have, which the head of state denotes. It’s not on Facebook that they draw it.
        2. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 9 October 2016 09: 22
          +7
          Quote: Mushroom
          right now there will be scream when we will be deprived of the veto, and will be deprived!

          In order to deprive Russia of veto power in the UN Security Council, it is necessary to decide on the possibility of such a step, by the current composition of the Security Council. But we will veto it again. Without our consent, a decision to deprive us of a veto would be illegitimate.
          1. Mushroom
            Mushroom 9 October 2016 11: 04
            0
            There is talk to deprive Russia of the veto right-read the news. And where have you seen recently the decisions in the full sense of the word are legitimate? -Example-the presence of the US and Turkey in Syria
        3. hrych
          hrych 9 October 2016 10: 17
          +5
          Quote: Mushroom
          when we will be deprived of the right of veto

          On the law depriving us of the right to veto, we will veto laughing There are fundamental principles of the UN as an organization with permanent members of the Security Council, if the Russian Federation leaves this organization, then this organization simply will not exist, and the Russian Federation will finance its work, and moreover, a huge part. For the Great Powers, the UN and its decisions do not really mean anything, the United States has acted this way, the Russian Federation has been behaving this way lately. The UN needs small countries to solve problems and disputes, such as the Arab territories occupied by Israel, etc. Thus, the UN has outlived itself with its decisions that are not being implemented, and the main decisions are condemnations, for which the violator choked and chuckled. The leaders of the New World Order are conferring within the framework of the Seven, the other part within the framework of the BRICS, they are gathering together in the framework of the Twenty, and the UN is so to say everything and no one, and nothing, all Lesotho, Ukraine and Latvia laughing
          1. Mushroom
            Mushroom 9 October 2016 11: 06
            0
            And again, there is talk of a proposal to deprive us of the right of veto !!!
            1. vovanpain
              vovanpain 9 October 2016 12: 07
              +9
              Quote: Mushroom
              And again, there is talk of a proposal to deprive us of the right of veto !!!

              You, dear, jammed? fellow Sympathize with you. hi
        4. Albert1988
          Albert1988 9 October 2016 17: 00
          0
          Quote: Mushroom
          right now there will be scream when we will be deprived of the veto, and will be deprived!

          In this case, the UN will simply be dissolved ... For it was created like this. that any reformatting of it without the consent of all members is actually its dissolution.
      2. Rom14
        Rom14 9 October 2016 09: 20
        +1
        And they don’t need to invent anything, they’re crap and they immediately blame Russia, everything is rehearsed. Urgently destroy the thugs in Aleppo. Why are not portable flamethrowers observed in ours ??? To pick out the barmalei from the cracks of the city better weapons are not necessary ....
        1. OLD FART
          OLD FART 9 October 2016 09: 51
          +2
          While holding on ...! The UN has turned into a chicken coop ... Churkin "burns the truth to the uterus" .. Well done!
          China's Permanent Representative to the UN, Liu Jiei, expressed his disappointment that the UN Security Council did not approve the resolution on Syria that the Russian side submitted. This was directly stated at a meeting of the Security Council.
          According to the Chinese representative, the document prepared by Moscow calls on all parties to the Syrian conflict to end the war in the Arab Republic and open safe paths for humanitarian convoys.
          Liu Jie himself considers the Russian document "complete and balanced." And the one that France initiated was disrespectful to the independence and territorial unity of Syria. The project did not at all reflect the constructive proposals of a number of countries, he explained.
          Recall, on the eve of the UN Security Council did not approve the proposed Russian resolution. China abstained from the vote.
          http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/20
          1610 ..

          Thank you China for your support! hi
          1. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 9 October 2016 13: 33
            +1
            Quote: STARPER
            Thank you China for your support!

            Well, you can't, as in the saying: "I look in a book, I see a fig!"
            You yourself give the text:
            Recall, on the eve of the UN Security Council did not approve the proposed Russian resolution. China abstained from the vote.
            http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/20
            1610 ..

            Well, where is the logic !? fool
            1. MarioG
              MarioG 9 October 2016 19: 52
              0
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              Recall, on the eve of the UN Security Council did not approve the proposed Russian resolution. China abstained from the vote.
              http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/20
              1610 ..
              Well, where is the logic !?

              For this case, there is just a saying "I heard the ringing but does not know where he is." Old age is not a joy. Starper after all.
      3. smith7
        smith7 9 October 2016 21: 06
        0
        Quote: Black
        And by and large all this garbage, men. As long as this pro-American brotherhood does not get rid of the Russian bear by a vile hare, this scum wanted to sneeze at our diplomatic steps and resolutions. These nits will think of something else.


        It is not that simple. Before starting to process the "vile mug" it is necessary to do a huge diplomatic and propaganda work. The positive image of Russia's steps in Syria is not obvious to the world community. Diplomacy is necessary for the image, but if this work is not carried out, then we will irrevocably remain an "evil empire".
    2. Bloodsucker
      Bloodsucker 9 October 2016 19: 55
      0
      The head of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov said that the United States threatens Russia's security and hurts its national interests.

      In an interview for the Vremya program on Channel One, Lavrov recalled the deployment of the military infrastructure of the NATO alliance near the borders of Russia.

      “We have recorded a radical change in circumstances with regard to aggressive Russophobia, which now underlies US policy towards Russia. This is not just rhetorical Russophobia, but aggressive steps that really hurt our national interests and threaten our security ", - he said.

      The minister noted that the likely US plans to strike the Syrian army are "dangerous games", especially given the official Russian military presence in the country.

      "These are very dangerous games, given that Russia, being in Syria at the invitation of the legitimate government of this country, has two bases and air defense systems there," Lavrov said.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1qnZCdBogQ
  2. Smog
    Smog 9 October 2016 08: 47
    +11
    Yes, the hack in the UN Security Council is now not a joke. I note that lately the Russian Federation has been less and less alone when voting against "exceptional" proposals of "exceptional" nations.
    The world is trying to get away from unipolar.
    I would like to wish Churkin perseverance and courage in conversations with "partners".
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 9 October 2016 09: 40
      +1
      The United States would like to be in time everywhere with its appetites, but not in time. I hope that countries will soon get rid of their pressure !!!
      In the evening, I will calmly look at the meeting of the UN Council on Syria. Thank you ----- Dryunya2 !!!!!!
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. Smog
        Smog 9 October 2016 10: 27
        +4
        When voting on the French resolution, China in no century supported us.

        And at the same time, he supported our resolution on Syria.
        After considering the French draft, the UN Security Council voted on the Russian one, which Russia submitted on Friday. The document was aimed at supporting the proposal of the UN special envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura on the withdrawal of Jabhat al-Nusra (banned in Russia - ed.) Militants from Aleppo and the agreements between the Russian Federation and the United States on Syria on September 9.

        The resolution did not pass in the UN Security Council, having received only four votes in support. Two of the five permanent members of the Security Council - Russia and China, as well as Venezuela and Egypt, which represents the Middle East and North Africa in the Security Council, spoke in favor of the document. Angola, as well as Uruguay, abstained in the vote.

        East is a delicate matter, Petruha .......
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Smog
            Smog 9 October 2016 13: 51
            +5
            Egypt, both ours and yours.
            And he, Egypt, as in the old joke, always hesitates, but along with the party line request
            and if in Russian, I want it, and it’s prickling, and my mother doesn’t order it.
  3. Observer2014
    Observer2014 9 October 2016 08: 54
    +9
    The universal weapon of the 21st century is terrorism. A weapon capable of erasing states on the continents. As devilishly correctly conceived. Gigantic territories are rich in resources controlled by rabble. And buying these resources is cheap. You can’t say anything smart. locals will break in. They were afraid to resist. From the West support. For the media an imitation of a struggle. And if there are no resources on the territory, then they cultivate drugs.
    The only country capable of breaking this diabolical business plan is Russia. With all due respect to China. He is weak. He hides and waits. It will blow.
    1. Titsen
      Titsen 9 October 2016 09: 21
      +1
      China is on AVOS, as we never expect. New weapons of the 21st century. TERRORISM will definitely not reach them!

      A clever monkey always waits while a bear with a united pack of strong and weak predators moves, and chooses the best moment to attack!

      Millennial Chinese Wisdom!

      In the meantime, the essence and the matter, they are strengthening and modernizing their armed forces, and, moreover, not only with defensive weapons! Beauties!

      And our partners simply didn’t leave us any choice ...
      1. vovanpain
        vovanpain 9 October 2016 09: 34
        +12
        Quote: Titsen
        China is on AVOS, as we never expect. New weapons of the 21st century. TERRORISM will definitely not reach them!

        A colleague, the Xinjiang Uyghur region in China, is the Chinese Caucasus and firing constantly, there are a lot of Uyghurs fighting in Syria and Iraq, in the ranks of ISIS and other barmels, they are returning to China. So China is not relaxing. And terrorism can reach today anyone and anywhere. hi
        1. mr.redpartizan
          mr.redpartizan 9 October 2016 10: 54
          0
          The problem of the Uyghurs can be solved by China in a week, if the will of the CCP leadership.
          1. Dryuya2
            Dryuya2 9 October 2016 11: 12
            +1
            Quote: mr.redpartizan
            The Uighurs problem can be solved by China in a week,

            looked in "pedivikia" in China, their 10 million. !!!!
            and what do you think they solve them .... (I mean the problems) belay
            1. mr.redpartizan
              mr.redpartizan 9 October 2016 11: 32
              0
              There are more than a billion Chinese, so the Uyghurs do not shine if they take it seriously. If the Uighurs decide to fight for independence, then the fate of the Indians awaits them.
      2. Observer2014
        Observer2014 9 October 2016 09: 57
        +4
        Titsen To you a colleague vovanpain I have already explained everything to the fact that terrorism is not threatening China. I want to supplement the account of Chinese wisdom for a thousand years.
        The Chinese with their wisdom as a pillow for whipping. For them the last century Russia fought all the time. And Great China did not win a single battle in the last century. And wherever Vietnam, Korea would come .CCCC. These sages grabbed these millennia by the tonsils. Everywhere! I’m silent what the Japanese did with them.
        Therefore, China can become a superpower only if there are military victories. Before that, it’s just a mega-plant, or a factory. Without Russia, the Americans "grab" China at once.
      3. dauria
        dauria 9 October 2016 10: 15
        +4
        A smart monkey is always waiting ....


        China voiced this position in the 70s. Sitting on a tree and waiting out the bickering of the USA and the USSR. Now the monkey has become a gorilla and her time to butt with the USA. And our role, alas, is the third (that same monkey on a tree). Unfortunately, this is a reality. Economy plus size, plus population (and geography) determine the strength of the country. You have to face the truth. We are not the first, nor the second .... (and especially not the Communists, but the ordinary ordinary bourgeoisie what, would not confuse Vekselberg’s interest with his own. I won’t understand everything. Why should he Syria? After all, he determines the policy ... More precisely, they)
      4. Albert1988
        Albert1988 9 October 2016 17: 05
        0
        Quote: Titsen
        New weapons of the 21st century. TERRORISM will definitely not reach them!

        For a long time, it’s not enough, but still sensitive, so the Chinese leadership is unlikely to ignore this factor.
      5. ghby
        ghby 10 October 2016 09: 27
        +1
        Quote: Titsen
        A clever monkey always waits while a bear with a united pack of strong and weak predators moves, and chooses the best moment to attack!

        Millennial Chinese Wisdom!

        Well, they’ll wait another thousand years, the wisdom is millennial.
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 9 October 2016 14: 01
      +3
      Quote: Observer2014
      With all due respect to China. He is weak. He hides and waits. Avos will carry over.
      In terms of GDP, this * wimp * came out on top in the world. (Russia is a superpower, only on the 12).
      2. As for * hiding * ... When it comes to the Asia-Pacific region, he openly threatens the United States with the use of military force ... Because this is their area of ​​interest, and Syria is ours ...
      3. * Waiting *? No, he doesn’t wait, but * the alliance * is waving with us against the Yankees, rightly believing that he cannot deal with the Yankees alone yet.
      4. The hunfuzy do not rely on * perhaps *, and are strengthening their forces with leaps and bounds. In years 5-6 PLA will be on par with us ...
      Then it will be no laughing matter ...
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 9 October 2016 20: 35
        +2
        Boa kaa Quote:
        leaps and bounds strengthen their aircraft. In 5-6 years, the PLA will be on par with us ...
        Then it will be no laughing matter ...
        That's when they can tear off a charge of eleven megatons. And then we'll talk. The truth is often hidden in my jokes. Mochachi will not have enough celestial things to repeat something. So Sakharov performed on Novaya Zemlya. Half a century ago.
        "Status 6" on the finish line to your favorite potential partners laughing
  4. Moor
    Moor 9 October 2016 08: 55
    +5
    So, the Syrians continue to put pressure on the "Barmaley", and judging by the intransigence of our side, they are quite active. It is a pity that our offer did not pass! How wonderful it would be to cover the whole riot with "rooks" on the way to Idlib! Vitaly Ivanovich, as always, is convincing and laconic in his wording, bravo! It is curious what the further course of the USA will be, it seems that all legal pressure moves have been exhausted.
    1. Mushroom
      Mushroom 9 October 2016 09: 05
      0
      But it will pass when the case is proposed to send materials to the Hague court
    2. Rom14
      Rom14 9 October 2016 09: 40
      +1
      They will be strenuously with "witnesses" to cook up an application against Russia in the Hague court ... they need a mess both in politics and on the continents ... And the "world" jackal will support them. Only a victory in Syria followed by reconstruction will ease the tension. And to soak thugs without a break for politics .... Vitaly courage and health, with such a beast, it will not hurt.
  5. Altona
    Altona 9 October 2016 08: 57
    +2
    In theory, the United States, Britain, Germany and France are sponsors of terrorism along with Qatar, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.
  6. Mushroom
    Mushroom 9 October 2016 09: 05
    +1
    Right now, the clowning will begin, to start at a meeting of the Security Council they will decide for limiting the veto for Russia. Voting will take place, otherwise again, where the thread in France, the thread will explode or the trucks will arrange a promenade for people, then they will accept a no-fly zone, then they will submit a motion for voting to the aagu statement or that the thread is in this vein about initiating a case of a crime against humanity in Syria and Aleppo. It seems that everyone will agree. But once there is a case, there is the accused party, the country and its leaders. And then this is wanted, search for criminals, court, you can without evidence, right now it’s fashionable and GORGEOUS !!!! - You’re new .... Well, you yourself guessed someone else poor Slabodan Milosevic with them, who warned us of the West by the way. And signing all this and all countries automatically become on the far side of the battlefield opposite the side against which the court passed, voila, we criminals are no longer unfounded but officially !!! With all the consequences !!!
    1. B.T.V.
      B.T.V. 9 October 2016 09: 38
      +2
      Excuse me, Evgeny Kiselevich, are you scaring us or are you already afraid ?!
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 9 October 2016 10: 15
        +2
        Judging by the syllable that wrote the comment in Mushroom's confusion. But from what, a question? I would write it in normal Russian and would be easier to read and the idea would be more understandable.
        1. Mushroom
          Mushroom 9 October 2016 10: 50
          0
          To make Russia a country with a criminal leadership and a criminal regime — which will have to be judged in all severity for crimes against humanity. And this is forgiven for 45 years, then Yugoslavia ... the message is clear what the Americans are doing?
          1. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 9 October 2016 14: 41
            +3
            Quote: Mushroom
            And this is Sorry-45 year ...
            About how!
            And for some reason, it seemed to me that in the 45 we put the Nazis on the Nuremberg bench ... angry
            then Yugoslavia ... the message is clear, what are the Americans doing?
            Well, well ... Really, the Amy want to imprison ISIS barbarians for the genocide !? No.
            - It’s how it turns out ... Yeah ... laughing
      2. Mushroom
        Mushroom 9 October 2016 10: 45
        0
        About this, did you dread my surname out of fear? -Write in the case, and let the kindergarteners write on paper. The story is such, it likes to be repeated.
        1. vovanpain
          vovanpain 9 October 2016 12: 10
          +9
          Quote: Mushroom
          Mushroom

          You would at least learn how to write and speak Russian correctly first. hi
        2. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 9 October 2016 15: 02
          +3
          Quote: Mushroom
          write about the case ...
          Well, persuaded!
          and let the kindergarteners write on paper.

          Glubokoooooo !!! Nooo ... here, damn it, bad luck: they (unlike you) * beeches * without mistakes * paint * .... (it is immediately clear that you did not attend the "Kindergarten", probably like other state. . establishments! (Self-taught, damn it, a genius appeared on the site !!!)
          History is such a thing-love repeats itself.

          Yeah ... But, if you attended a kindergarten at one time, you could add Hegel's catch phrase: "History repeats itself twice: the first time in the form of a tragedy, the second - in the form of a farce."
          But, you didn’t attend the kindergarten ... * letters * didn’t mean anything ... As you can see from the grammar of the post.
          (write letters ... you are our genius!) laughing
          1. Mushroom
            Mushroom 9 October 2016 16: 59
            0
            Was it too lazy to scribble nonsense? -You write on the matter dear, as I didn’t contact you at all, for me you wrote nothing more than tuftology about some kind of Hegel, when something comes up above that I wrote above, also giggle .Leaving post-Toko I think I will not laugh
  7. Masya masya
    Masya masya 9 October 2016 09: 05
    +8
    "Neither the French nor the Russian resolutions on Syria were adopted in the UN Security Council" exchanged "pleasantries", but what's the point ... Does the UN Security Council make sense?
    1. Knowing
      Knowing 9 October 2016 09: 21
      +8
      Quote: Masya Masya
      "Neither the French nor the Russian resolutions on Syria were adopted in the UN Security Council" exchanged "pleasantries", but what's the point ... Does the UN Security Council make sense?

      Rather, it will be said that neither the American nor the Russian resolutions were adopted ..., the frogmen only voice it. But actually:
    2. Rom14
      Rom14 9 October 2016 09: 42
      0
      Doesn’t, we are there in a pit with snakes ...
  8. Titsen
    Titsen 9 October 2016 09: 08
    +1
    Churkin also burns to the fullest! Well done!

    The Chinese seem to have become a little closer to us. That’s understandable, they have their own interests not far at all - they build a base near Asian oil fields, practically blocking all seafaring routes ... Mattress mats and their associated hangers-on are like a bone in the throat in this region.

    Only here in any way the Crimea is not recognized by us! This is not good ...
  9. Petrovich1952
    Petrovich1952 9 October 2016 09: 18
    +4
    In general, stop interfering in the affairs of other sovereign states, leave these colonial habits, leave the world alone. And then the situation will improve in many areas and regions of the world, ”Golden Words.
    1. Masya masya
      Masya masya 9 October 2016 09: 49
      +4
      The words are not a boy, but a husband ...
  10. Stas Snezhin
    Stas Snezhin 9 October 2016 09: 21
    +1
    The UN Security Council has outlived itself, and has become only a stage to demonstrate its position ..
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 9 October 2016 15: 22
      +2
      Quote: Stas Snezhin
      The UN Security Council has outlived itself

      The staff members are trying to get into the international community just this * thinking *!
      Quote: Stas Snezhin
      (Security Council) was only a stage to demonstrate its position ..

      I would say that the Security Council remains the ONLY * scene * that the Yankees are not able to cover / crush / drown out the voice of truth - the speech of our diplomats in front of television cameras of journalists from the community of m!
      That's why the Americans are trying to reformat it for themselves, beloved ones!
      No need to indulge in this with their comments!
      IMHO.
  11. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 9 October 2016 09: 41
    +1
    The bewitched circle ... We push water in a mortar. It is a pity that we are always in the minority. And this situation cannot be reversed.
  12. Knight Rider
    Knight Rider 9 October 2016 10: 09
    0
    French version of the resolution:
    against - Russia and Venezuela
    abstained - China and Angola
    for - USA and "six"
    Russian version of the resolution:
    For - Russia, China, Venezuela and Egypt
    abstained - Angola and Uruguay
    against - the United States and their "six"
  13. Filing
    Filing 9 October 2016 10: 10
    +2
    In our country, a video is being played with an American general about readiness for a third world war because of Russia's refusal to submit to the United States.
    This general is waiting for an order, his authority to start a war is not enough.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 9 October 2016 15: 31
      +1
      Quote: FilinG
      This general is waiting for an order, his authority to start a war is not enough.

      All right!
      I already wrote on another thread:
      Wars unleash politicians. And the military are like dogs: they can bark, but they attack only after the command of the owner - "FAS!" Yes
      So this general is waiting for the team ...
  14. Sotskiy
    Sotskiy 9 October 2016 10: 14
    +3
    "The representative of the United Kingdom exclaimed pathetically," Stop (the airstrikes) now. " Indeed, stop now supporting various rabble around the world - extremists, terrorists and various other lovers to rock the situation in a particular country. In general, stop interfering in the affairs of other sovereign states, abandon these colonial habits, leave the world alone. And then the situation will improve in many regions and regions of the world, ”said Vitaly Churkin.

    Churkin is handsome! good Finally, our diplomacy began to speak to the rabble in a mug everything that he thought about it, without curtsy.
  15. APASUS
    APASUS 9 October 2016 10: 18
    0
    The UN more and more reminds me of a rotten office, with its intrigues, rumors and under the carpet game. And as a rule, the winner is not the one who is right, but the one who is dodgy.
  16. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 9 October 2016 10: 19
    0
    France once again showed its independence, not its independence, but its complete dependence on the United States. At the same time, their foreign minister, before traveling to Moscow, threatened heaven with punishments all the way to The Hague. Those who have already been waiting for in the tribunal, which I am sure will be created over time, are the leaders of the United States, France, Germany, Great Britain and, of course, Saudis with Qatari.
  17. OLD FART
    OLD FART 9 October 2016 10: 24
    +2
    It's a shame for the power, but there is someone to take revenge ...
    wassat bully
  18. Simple
    Simple 9 October 2016 10: 28
    0
    Quote: from article
    . Indeed, stop supporting various rabble all over the world now - extremists, terrorists and various other amateurs to rock the situation in this or that country. In general, stop interfering in the affairs of other sovereign states, leave these colonial habits, leave the world alone. And then the situation will improve in many areas and regions of the world, ”said Vitaly Churkin.
    .


    Walking briefly through the Western press. ...
    In the Western press, he (Vitaly Churkin) is not quoted.
    On the contrary, in the Russian resolution in vain you can look for a clause on the cessation of further bombing (of course, for peaceful purposes).
  19. igorv501
    igorv501 9 October 2016 10: 38
    +1
    Doctor in the circle of mindless!
  20. Go through
    Go through 9 October 2016 11: 09
    +1
    Churkin, three times the hero of Russia! Not a muscle wavered to listen to all this lying and insulting nonsense. It’s always surprising, but why do British women hate us so much ???
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 9 October 2016 15: 45
      +1
      Quote: Nyura
      ... why do British women hate us so much ???
      The roots of such an ardent dislike for us lie in history ... The struggle of empires, freedom-loving rebellious people! Then the USSR, which helped India free itself from the British yoke ...
      Well, how can you love such barbarians !?
  21. unsinkable
    unsinkable 9 October 2016 12: 12
    0
    Impudently, not embarrassed, they engage in verbiage. At first, the striking tactics of reversing the facts are no longer surprising. It is not surprising even that all the vassals know that their master, Uncle Sam, is a complete bastard, but gives them a bite of crust from his table. . They can not be chewed.
  22. SPB.RU
    SPB.RU 9 October 2016 12: 31
    +1
    Look at these animals laughing
    1. MarioG
      MarioG 9 October 2016 19: 57
      0
      Quote: SPB.RU
      Look at these animals

      That is, you ascribe yourself to the highest dissipation?
      1. SPB.RU
        SPB.RU 9 October 2016 21: 20
        +2
        That is, you ascribe yourself to the highest dissipation?

        No, I'm an ordinary person ... Just normal people don’t behave like that, don’t you agree?
  23. Max_Bauder
    Max_Bauder 9 October 2016 14: 23
    0
    Neither the French nor the Russian resolutions on Syria were adopted by the UN Security Council.

    And they will not accept. They only accept orders from the USA. smile
  24. razved
    razved 9 October 2016 14: 59
    +2
    It was predictable. With such opposite approaches, it is almost impossible to agree.
  25. Mushroom
    Mushroom 9 October 2016 23: 38
    0
    dear what are you? -we will veto the proposal to decide us the right of the vetera-we will veto our proposal and they will put a bolt on our veto !!! that's soooooo !!! - Big !!! - and on the drum that they will violate the law, they if you have not jammed notice it is constantly being violated !!! Or are you so twisted that you don’t see obvious things? They do not have written laws for them, they will put the bolter on our veto and deprive us of this right and that's it !!! Hague will sue us for allegedly a crime against humanity and that’s it !!! And again !!! - for direct to, cool and threaded I say-If they want to deprive-deprive-violate the laws they are used to and no law will stop them !!!!! - And what will you be nice to do? Do the Apostle Paul complain?vovanpain,
  26. Mushroom
    Mushroom 9 October 2016 23: 42
    0
    Quote: vovanpain
    Quote: Mushroom
    And again, there is talk of a proposal to deprive us of the right of veto !!!

    You, dear, jammed? fellow Sympathize with you. hi
    dear what are you? -we will veto the proposal to decide us the right of the vetera-we will veto our proposal and they will put a bolt on our veto !!! that's soooooo !!! - Big !!! - and on the drum that they will violate the law, they if you have not jammed notice it is constantly being violated !!! Or are you so twisted that you don’t see obvious things? They do not have written laws for them, they will put the bolter on our veto and deprive us of this right and that's it !!! Hague will sue us for allegedly a crime against humanity and that’s it !!! And again !!! - for direct to, cool and threaded I say-If they want to deprive-deprive-violate the laws they are used to and no law will stop them !!!!! - And what will you be nice to do? Do the Apostle Paul complain? [