Lukashenko criticized the Kremlin for refusing to place Iskander complexes in Belarus

167
The Belarusian President criticized the authorities of the Russian Federation for the “insufficient” military assistance in terms of the supply of arms to protect the union state, reports RIA News.

Lukashenko criticized the Kremlin for refusing to place Iskander complexes in Belarus




Earlier, Alexander Lukashenko said that the Russians can count on the support of the Belarusian troops in the western direction.

“In my opinion, 170 paid millions of dollars, took C-300 away, repaired them, modernized it and put it into service,” he said at a meeting with deputies.

According to the president, Belarus offered Russia “to supply Iskander complexes to the republic in connection with the activation of some forces,” but this proposal did not receive support. In this regard, Belarus “was forced to organize the production of the Polonez rocket launcher system”.

“So what happens: in protecting you (Russia), should I come to you and buy another automatic? This is normal?"- outraged Lukashenko.
  • RIA News. Sergey Astapovich
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

167 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +86
    8 October 2016 09: 56
    and when he was offered to place an air base with our aircraft, what did he refuse? hypocrite and beggar.
    1. +42
      8 October 2016 09: 59
      Even the Old Man drives a lot lately!
      1. +54
        8 October 2016 10: 11
        Buy Old Man and place it yourself ....! I cooked well on apples and crabs, and raised the payment for oil transit ..! Do you remember the saying "Greed ruined the frayer ..." ... wassat
        All the same "collective farm" thinking in him .. Rakes everything that is possible.! I made "caches" with a trough in the forests ...?
        1. +84
          8 October 2016 10: 29
          Ukrainians fed the entire Union.
          This one protects the whole of Russia.

          How to live without them ??? laughing
          1. +16
            8 October 2016 11: 02
            Quote: Temples
            How to live without them ???

            Yes, it’s full of you, here is an example near Nezalezhnaya, even though the order is in Belarus and thanks for that. Well, he raised the transit prices, so the ruble really fell to the dollar, so the Old Man wanted to equalize, but we have the settlements in rubles, and we buy the potatoes for rubles, and the EU does not fall off the currency for the potato (for some reason). And for hydrocarbons, the Russian Federation receives payment in euros, the Old Man and it became a shame. But here the matter of principle has already gone, the GDP is fighting an irreconcilable fight against the dollar (and the euro, respectively), the entire BRICS and Iran are already converting in national currencies (we know that the dollar and its daughter, the euro, will collapse, the World Order will collapse). Accordingly, in response to tariff increases, they suspended the supply of products of Belarusian companies, shorter hit the potato below the belt. In short, it’s a trifle, they’ll agree, cut it down, lose it there, but we will not yield. And according to Iskander, the Republic of Belarus is not very relevant because there is V. Prussia (the Prussians destroyed by the Teutons the Russian tribe) and from the south there is the Crimea, from where it is closer to Bukaenham Palace ...
            1. 0
              8 October 2016 12: 20
              and what, "beaver" has grown up?
            2. +8
              8 October 2016 14: 10
              Since when did the Prussians become Russian? Are you out of your mind? Call still Latvians Russian. Have you read Zadornov?
            3. +3
              8 October 2016 14: 43
              Quote: hrych
              GDP fights against the dollar (and the euro, respectively)

              what is expressed? After all, oil and gas are sold and collected further for euros and dollars in the same Europe. Anyway, all the calculations in them
              Quote: hrych
              entire BRICS and Iran are already transferring settlements in national currencies

              does not look like it. The collapse in oil prices did not play in the best way on the currency of countries.
              Quote: hrych
              World order will collapse

              it will collapse and nobody will need neither oil nor a ruble.
              Conventional graters of Belarus and the Russian Federation in connection with the depreciation of the ruble and payment of transit. Everyone has their own interests. Nothing will fall from the people. Is it just bickering on the Internet.
            4. +5
              8 October 2016 19: 09
              Quote: FlyEngine
              Since when did the Prussians become Russian

              Do not confuse any disgusting type of Latvians and Prussians, in the Baltic besides them there were Lutich, Bodrich and Rugs (the priestly center is the island of Rügen). What the hell is Zadornov from the Rus (Prussians) according to the lives of the saints Vladimir princes of the early 16th century, Ivan the Terrible considered himself a descendant of the Prussians, i.e. of the Rus living between the Vistula and the Neman. Well, he probably knew more than yours about his family tree and who the Prussians are.
            5. +2
              8 October 2016 19: 45
              Quote: Retvizan
              what is expressed? After all, oil and gas are sold and collected further for euros and dollars in the same Europe. Anyway, all the calculations in them
              does not look like it. The collapse in oil prices did not play in the best way on the currency of countries.
              will collapse and no one will need neither oil nor ruble

              It is expressed in the mutual trade of raw materials for national currencies bypassing the supranational ones controlled by Zakulis, and at its discretion, setting the course and price of raw materials ignoring the market conditions. For example, to undermine the economy of the USSR, the price per barrel of oil was deliberately lowered to $ 16, and when they wanted to completely destroy the Russian Federation, when there was a default in 1998, the price was lowered to $ 6, the container was more expensive. Tried now, but below 30 could not. It was reflected in the national currency (ruble), but it was not so, the central bank intentionally did not maintain the ruble exchange rate by dumping foreign exchange reserves because the weakening of the exchange rate was parallel to the stock - import substitution, in order to raise its producer primarily from agriculture and to blow off imported goods from the counter, which due to the course have become twice as expensive. There was also an action to drop the shares of our TNCs and their further redemption for a pittance from foreign investors. There was a brilliant operation and they will write about it later in textbooks. When the dollar collapses, oil will not be needed? And how to refuel cars, planes, ships, than to heat a thermal power station for communal services and the work of enterprises? The same US currency will be real, behind which there will be a gold reserve, or other equivalents, industry, etc., and the market will control the exchange rate of commodities and prices of raw materials (I say, like some kind of liberal), and not the will, some obscurantists. It will just fall into the people, this is a fair world order and, in principle, hunger and poverty on Earth can simply be avoided, no more, no less.
            6. +2
              8 October 2016 23: 10
              Lukashenka's direct speech, without any "translators" and talkers.

              "If we do not fulfill the contracts, agreements, no one will work with us. And we hope, it seems to me that to some extent the ice has broken. And today I was informed that there are some new proposals. Well, I think that the President of Russia is there. already intervened in this matter. We should not fight because of this. Therefore, we hope that these issues will be resolved. We are reasonable people, we are ready to retreat where necessary, we are ready to compromise, but this must be done honestly. "
              https://cont.ws/post/394460

              And this is to the question of a single defense space

              On October 5, units of the 98th Guards Airborne Division of the Airborne Forces of the Russian Armed Forces arrived in Brest to participate in a joint bilateral battalion tactical exercise.

              From the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus, the event will be attended by units of the 38th Separate Guards Airborne Assault Brigade of the Special Operations Forces of the Armed Forces, the calculation of the unmanned aerial complex of the center for the preparation and use of the LHC, the aviation equipment of the 50th mixed air base of the Air Force and Air Defense Forces.

              The exercise will be held in three stages under the leadership of the commander of special operations forces of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus. The active phase of the exercise will be held from October 18 to 20 at the Brestsky training ground
              http://www.mil.by/ru/news/5840...
        2. +19
          8 October 2016 10: 46
          Quote: STARPER
          Do you remember the saying "Greed ruined the frayer ..." ...

          The Russian authorities came to the dad with a proposal for a customs union and a single economic space, but it is not clear why tariffs are different in a single economic space. Who is there greedy then?
          About the crabs and shrimp.
          Today, Santa Bremor is about 5 professionals united by a common goal - to become the best in their field.
          Production is provided by 6 production sites located in Belarus, Brest (the central office of the company) and Russia, Noginsk, with a total area of ​​more than 74 square meters, including the main production and storage facilities. The company brings together more than 000 brands, the most famous of which are: “Santa Bremor”, “Russian Sea”, “Matias”, “Caviar No. 15”. The company produces more than 1 product names in 900 main categories:

          - Preserves from herring
          - Canned fish
          - Capelin roe
          - Salmon caviar and natural caviar of other fish species
          - Salmon products
          - Seafood
          - Surimi
          - Salads and seaweed
          - Frozen convenience foods

          Noginsk is a city in the Moscow region in which there is a joint seafood processing plant with the Germans as well as in Brest (RB), but I didn’t hear that the plant was closed due to anti-sanctions? And what about the Roshen Lipetsk plant?
          1. +13
            8 October 2016 12: 11
            Quote: saturn.mmm
            The Russian authorities came to the dad with a proposal for a customs union and a single economic space,

            I would say on my knees crawled. Without Lyasander Grygorich, it wouldn’t have grown together! But he didn’t muddle this whole topic when he methylated on the Russian throne?
            Quote: saturn.mmm
            it’s just not clear why tariffs are different in a single economic space.

            Do you already agree to switch to the common ruble? Speaking of tariffs, that's a good question. It is not clear to me why gas should be cheaper in Belarus than in Russia.

            Quote: saturn.mmm
            a city in the Moscow region in which there is also a seafood processing plant with the Germans, as well as in Brest (RB), that I did not hear that the plant was closed due to anti-sanctions?

            Well, first of all, this is a joint Belarusian-German enterprise. And the sanctions we have imposed are not against legal entities, but on products.
            Quote: saturn.mmm
            And what about the Roshen Lipetsk plant?

            Yes, everything is fine! Pays taxes to the budget of the invaders, partially offsetting our costs of the occupation.
            1. +6
              8 October 2016 12: 58
              Quote: Corporal Valera
              I would say on my knees crawled. Without Lyasander Grygorich, it wouldn’t have grown together! But he didn’t muddle this whole topic when he methylated on the Russian throne?

              No one was crawling on their knees, but the proposal was from the Russian side, it didn’t grow together without a dad, Russian customs officers are now sitting in Brest. Why was it necessary to block the garden, everyone would live in his own if Belarus is so heavy for you, it's funny to hear groans from the Russian side about the fact that the Republic of Belarus has filled up Russia with fish and shrimps when Russia itself is sitting on a fish "Klondike", there is nowhere more crab than in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk but for some reason Russia imports it from the Republic of Belarus, strangely somehow
              .
              Quote: Corporal Valera
              Do you already agree to switch to the common ruble? Speaking of tariffs, that's a good question. It is not clear to me why gas should be cheaper in Belarus than in Russia.

              In a single economic space, gas should be the same for the price of what for the Russian Federation what for the Republic of Belarus
              Quote: Corporal Valera
              Well, first of all, this is a joint Belarusian-German enterprise.

              A "Russian Sea" of course there is no business.
              Quote: Corporal Valera
              Yes, everything is fine! Pays taxes to the budget

              Similarly, "Santa Bramor" from Noginsk pays taxes to the budget of the union state.
            2. +6
              8 October 2016 13: 14
              Quote: saturn.mmm
              if Belarus is so heavy for you,

              Do not distort!
              Quote: saturn.mmm
              In a single economic space, gas should be the same for the price of what for the Russian Federation what for the Republic of Belarus

              This is a loss of sovereignty! Cho, then maybe we’ll stir up the air base? And we will organize duty-free oil transit?
              Quote: saturn.mmm
              A "Russian Sea" of course there is no business.

              Yes, at least buy "Roshen". Control re-export only. By the way, economic sanctions in a single economic zone should not be uniform, shouldn't they?
            3. +7
              8 October 2016 14: 01
              Explain on what basis the price of fuel and lubricants in the Russian Federation is not inferior to the price of the same fuel and lubricants in Western countries?
              Explain the sufferer for the interests of oil oligarchs. Why gasoline, grade 95, is worth
              in US dollars-Venezuela-0,01, Saudi-0,24, Turkmenistan-0,28, Ku
              Gate 0,34, Nigeria 0,45
              RUSSIA-0,61? You will translate into rubles yourself, the price in RB-0,62.
              Why is that?
              I choose the AI-95. Therefore, I take the average price of one of the gas stations:
              (38.32 + 37.52) / 2 = 37.92 rubles / liter
              We translate into dollars, driving into Google "37.92 rubles to dollars". I get "$ 0.49223952". So the price of the 95th
              0.49223952 dollars / liter
              To date, cost calculations have been made previously.
              1 USD = $ 62.45
              1 RUB = 0.02 USD today

              We convert liters to American gallons, driving "1 American gallon in liters" into Google. That's 3.78541 liters per gallon. So the price of the 95th

              0.49223952 * 3.78541 = 1.86 dollars / gallon

              Let's remember this figure. GALLON is a measure of volume in the English system of measures, corresponding to 3,79 to 4,55 liters
              American is equal to 3,785 liters; and an English gallon is 4,546 liters.
              Total, how much does the gallon cost in rubles?
              Why is that?
              Is our country NOT producing oil?
              Or the answer is simple, we get it, but the margin does not settle in our pockets at all, but in a small group of people who saddled a pipe, 90?
            4. +7
              8 October 2016 14: 21
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              Explain the sufferer for the interests of oil oligarchs. Why gasoline, grade 95, is worth

              Yes Yes. I'm very embarrassed crying . However, you probably did not mind when 20 trillion rubles were allocated for rearmament? It was necessary to hit the table with his fist: Do not take damn bourgeois money! For not figs!
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              American is equal to 3,785 liters; and an English gallon is 4,546 liters.
              Total, how much does the gallon cost in rubles?
              Why is that?

              I will tell you a secret. In fact, its value is equal to the value of the paper on which the dollar is printed laughing
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              the margin settles in our pockets not at all with us, but in a small handful of saddles that pipe, in 90?

              I beg of you! The margin there is% 20. Good-30%. The rest is excise taxes, taxes, fees and other components that form our deficit budget. How is our budget formed to be reminded? Why will we refuse? From a base in Vietnam? In Cuba? From Destroyer Leader? Well, so that the price of gas suits you and Lyasandro Grygorich feels good? Let's not break away from reality or even then the socialist system will be more secure by the year 17.
            5. +2
              8 October 2016 15: 00
              Lance corporal Valera,
              You’ll throw pancakes on your own — and this, the answer to you, is from yours, from your own resource, from where such stuffing comes from as in this thread, what are you not happy with?
              20 trillion rubles for rearmament is not the merit of the oligarchs, I shouldn’t say thanks for that.
              You will distort, in another place.
              Quote: Corporal Valera
              I will tell you a secret. In fact, its value is equal to the value of the paper on which the dollar is printed

              That is, you acknowledge that your oil oligrahs value toad skins, but they tear three skins in rubles from us?
              Quote: Corporal Valera

              I beg of you! The margin there is% 20. Good-30%. The rest is excise taxes, taxes, fees and other components that form our deficit budget. How is our budget formed? Why will we refuse? From a base in Vietnam? In Cuba? From Destroyer Leader?

              Why are you making a hysteria? Do we all bow down to the bills of exchange, Potanin, Abramovich and others? Do they turn out to be benefactors with us?
              Gasoline pricing is one of the biggest mysteries of the global economy. The cheapest fuel is sold in Venezuela - they ask for only 2 US cents per liter. The most expensive gasoline in Norway - 2 euros. Both one and the other country not only provides itself with its own oil, but is also one of the most active players in the global energy market. Objectively, the market value of fuel is formed on the basis of a number of components: production, transportation, processing and retail margin. It seems that everything is simple. But not in our country. What pushes domestic prices up? This is due to the fact that up to 65% of the cost of petroleum products in Russia consists of taxes and fees.

              From the POPULATION, not from your "poor" oligarchs.

              In other words, oil companies will be able to export more oil and light oil products, and the budget will compensate for its losses by receiving more taxes from the extraction of “black gold”. The Russian retail market should not suffer. Sellers who sell their fuel domestically will receive certain benefits that, according to officials, can offset the growth of MET.

              But ordinary consumers will pay for it.

              Currently, Russian officials suspect major bidders in manipulating oil product prices. If their suspicions are confirmed, then fuel companies expect multibillion-dollar fines, but consumers are hardly worth preparing for lower prices.

              The rise in gas prices is a one-way ticket. Growth has already begun, and it will continue in the near future.
              Russian Energy Minister Novak said that the real cost of gasoline in Russia is about 3.5 rubles per liter.
              All the rest is taxes and excise taxes, established mostly from the USA. Thus, with the current price of gas at 35 rubles per liter, its real price is about 3.5 rubles.
              The minister also said that in connection with world oil price drops, the price of gasoline will increase.
              source: http://ria.ru/economy/20141210/1037492496.html
            6. +5
              8 October 2016 15: 38
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              You’ll throw pancakes on your own — and this, the answer to you, is from yours, from your own resource, from where such stuffing comes from as in this thread, what are you not happy with?

              Eka you famously changed shoes in the air) Well, let's assume that you showed us wink
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              That is, you acknowledge that your oil oligrahs value toad skins, but they tear three skins in rubles from us?

              Listen, I have a feeling that you are calling me to the Winter Palace. I admit it, actually, but I wanted to say something else, namely that the mattresses get oil for nothing, and we are forced to hunch over the whole country to buy their dollars.
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              What are you doing hysteria for?

              Oh, I'm sorry, it’s just that you will copy-paste so convincingly that I already pulled out all my hair. Yeah Yes
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              This is due to the fact that up to 65% of the cost of petroleum products in Russia consists of taxes and fees.

              From the POPULATION, not from your "poor" oligarchs.

              So what? And when you go for groceries, doesn’t it bother you? Developed capitalism in the yard. I also want in the USSR. Right now, the last hair on my chest I will tear out, fuck-tibedoh, and together we’ll carry over.
            7. +1
              8 October 2016 17: 35
              Well done, well said, part of the taxes are used to partially compensate for the expenses of the invaders, and the profits are spent on bullets and shells for the ATO, as a result, everyone is happy!
            8. +2
              8 October 2016 18: 03
              Quote: gur4enk
              , and profit goes to bullets and shells for the ATO

              And Poroshenko with his own money raises the industry of Ukraine, pays pensions, benefits, assists the poor and wretched ... The sky has not seen this shameful patsaka the most generous patron of the arts. You just say your question out loud: "Where is the profit going?" And the answer will be indicated by itself. And the factory will always have time to select. Suddenly, a relapse will happen on the blue.
            9. +1
              8 October 2016 18: 30
              By the way, can we then (after closing) send 1500 citizens of the Russian Federation to you in Belarus for work? And along with the bankrupt suppliers of raw materials. You explain to them there that they are not patriotic. Give money for the first time. Do you want to give up your place at work? So people, too, lose their job, I think, they do not want to.
            10. 0
              9 October 2016 13: 40
              Quote: Corporal Valera
              I would say on my knees crawled. Without Lyasander Grygorich, it wouldn’t have grown together! But he didn’t muddle this whole topic when he methylated on the Russian throne?

              The patient is treated, EurAsEC - was created with the filing of Nazarbayev. If you strain, you will easily find evidence of this - Putin personally.
              The Russian authorities came to the dad with a proposal for a customs union and a single economic space,
              The union state is Lukashenko’s initiative, and therefore the Stalinist in Minsk, if you did not know. And the EurAsEC is Nazarbayev’s initiative. Otherwise, China would be crushed economically on the one hand, and Russia on the other. So to say, a reserve in case the WTO had not been taken. Where did he climb like a ram.
          2. +11
            8 October 2016 12: 48
            Quote: saturn.mmm
            About the crabs and shrimp.
            Today the company "Santa Bremor"

            You have modestly kept silent that the Santa Bremor company, like the dairy products Savushkin Product, belongs to the Belarusian oligarch (on a Belarusian scale) Moshensky. Here, many Russians and Belarusians foaming at their mouths argue that Russian oligarchs cannot sleep, dream of chopping off a tidbit of Belarusian property, but here the Belarusian oligarch calmly stuffs his pockets in Russia on shrimp and no one arrests him like this, Baumgertner. Of course, all Belarusian oligarchs are under the thumb of the Chief, you can't fade here, Chizh didn't pay, stand there, pay!
            1. +2
              8 October 2016 14: 06
              Quote: Anatol Klim
              then the Russian oligarchs cannot sleep, they dream of chopping off a tidbit of Belarusian property,

              Is that not so?
              Why sin against the truth?
              In a stranger’s eye is a log, but in our whole oak grove we don’t see? A strange aberration of vision.
              The data for 2015 is fresh, so what do they confirm? And they confirm that the output is simply not in the subject.
              http://politinform.su/ekonomika-i-finansy/24385-r
              ossiyskiy-biznes-v-belorussii-tekuschaya-situaciy
              ai-perspektivy.html
              And you do not see this point blank?
              http://www.belaruspartisan.org/economic/124628/
            2. +5
              8 October 2016 14: 46
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              And you do not see this point blank?
              http://www.belaruspartisan.org/economic/124628/

              Damn, later here brand the shame of the white-collar and orange smile
              You yourself look at the site that you bring. It is written in Russian in white that it was founded by Pavel Sheremet. Then google to help. Russophobe! Nationalist! Maydanschik! Aide to the Nazis! Guard! Russian oligarchs rob Belarus! lol
        3. +2
          8 October 2016 11: 47
          Quote: STARPER
          All the same "collective farm" thinking in him .. Rakes everything that is possible.! I made "caches" with a trough in the forests ...?

          Rather, it is with you ... not even a collective farm, you need to have a mind on the collective farm to manage the economy, you have rather the thinking of a bursak, upstairs, about nothing, like Homa Brut.
          1. 0
            8 October 2016 12: 23
            in the spring it will be impossible to approach the caches with cartha
          2. +2
            8 October 2016 15: 07
            [quote Corporal Valera = Damn, you are here branding the shame of the white-collar workers and the Orangemen
            You yourself look at the site that you bring. It is written in Russian in white that it was founded by Pavel Sheremet. Then google to help. Russophobe! Nationalist! Maydanschik! Aide to the Nazis! Guard! Russian oligarchs rob Belarus! [/ Quote]
            By your reception, yes, to you, too ... damn it, you beat your own that you so eagerly rushed to serve the interests of the Potanins, Abramovichs?
            The resource is yours, exactly the same from where the stuffing and articles in this thread.
            Why don’t you recognize yourself?

            So do not tear yourself away from reality - nobody will let you swallow a piece, a market, your invention for nothing, and when this market hits you on the head, then don’t scream about socialism in which such a mess was simply not possible.
            Quote: Corporal Valera
            Well, so that the price of gas suits you and Lyasandro Grygorich feels good? Let's not break away from reality or even then the socialist system will provide
            1. +3
              8 October 2016 16: 45
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              By your reception, yes to you, and ... pancake

              Well, just say that you have bitten yourself a bit, using the national resource. And then: - This I showed you how not to do ... Perform somersaults like that.
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              that you so zealously rushed to serve the interests of Potanin, Abramovich?

              laughing You famously hung up labels. I look, thoughtfulness is your hobby. Honest and simple, like two fingers, Lukashenko did not pass another fraternal freebie! Guard! The oligarchs invaded the planet! You better tell me when a constant freebie contributed to the responsibility of the freebie? For example, if possible. And do not copy-paste the contracts are different. Everyone knows the price from recent history.
      2. +13
        8 October 2016 10: 31
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Even the Old Man drives a lot lately!

        you are wrong, he has been driving for a very long time .... he just has it in waves .... my opinion is that as soon as Fashington and Berlin beckon him (with guarantees) .... he will surrender both his country and us in the back the knife will stick ..... it is so veiled ... in the dill, at least everything is clear .... but here the swamp is still there!
        1. 0
          8 October 2016 21: 32
          gispanec Do you think Old Man, and doesn’t know how friendship with the West ends? He knows, he’s just a tricky politician and bargains wink ! He understands that without Russia he has kirdyk! He certainly has a Napoleonic complex, but this will pass when Russia will finally get on its feet!
      3. +7
        8 October 2016 10: 49
        And who is this one, Sergei Astapovich? What is famous for the fact that everyone here emanates and screams?
        He gave some nonsense and those who shouted in chorus to you, how bad Lukashenko is.

        According to the president, Belarus offered Russia "to supply Iskander complexes to the republic in connection with the activation of some forces," but this proposal did not receive support. In this regard, Belarus “was forced to organize the production of the Polonaise multiple launch rocket systems”. “So what happens: defending you (Russia), should I come to you and buy another machine gun? Is this normal? ”- Lukashenka was indignant
        And what is he wrong about?
        And the ears of this bullshit, stuffing, as always stick out from Beloranzhoppovskih resources, here is an example, Sergey Andreev, frank Beloranzhopp, here is the blog http://maxpark.com/community/5206/content/5299129
        , where never, say anything positive about RB or write.
        Consist of the feed of Polish grantors.
        Mikalai Paddubitsky - another representative from there, read his briefs, along with the company of his admirers. Especially the early ones concerning the terrorist attack in the Minsk metro will understand a lot.
        1. +7
          8 October 2016 12: 00
          Quote: The Bloodthirster
          Belarus offered Russia “to supply Iskander complexes to the republic in connection with the activation of some forces,” but this proposal did not receive support. In this regard, Belarus “was forced to organize the production of the Polonez multiple launch rocket systems”.

          MLRS Polonaise instead of Iskander? Original

          Quote: The Bloodthirster
          So it turns out: protecting you (Russia)

          But defend yourself is not enough? Belarus surrounded by friends forever?
          But is it not fate to ask the military about the need to deploy the Iskander in Belarus?
          1. +1
            8 October 2016 12: 53
            You have no destiny to be in the Union of Belarus and the Russian Federation, no fate and influence our relationship.
            The bloodsucker Today, 12:51
            And we have different relations, the answer is here, you can continue to pop something from the category of the non-obvious and completely unbelievable
            http://www.belvpo.com/ru/59270.html
            1. +1
              8 October 2016 13: 13
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              You have no destiny to be in the Union of Belarus and the Russian Federation, no fate and influence our relationship.

              1. And you, who does this?
              2. And you are Wang No. 2, can you foresee the fate of people / nations?
              3.our relationship Like this is our sandbox, get out of here.
              Well, I'm an ethnic Russian and a citizen of Russia. So it concerns me no less than YOU.
          2. 0
            8 October 2016 21: 39
            aleks26 For the West, Belarus is of interest as a buffer state, and an ally of Russia! So, it will not get bumps for beautiful eyes, but for us!
        2. +6
          8 October 2016 12: 21
          Quote: The Bloodthirster
          So it turns out: protecting you (Russia), I have to come to you and buy another machine? Is this normal? ”Lukashenka was indignant
          And what is he wrong about?

          The fact that you have to protect yourself first. I do not think that they will be in ceremony: Let me pass through you. Let me fly through you ...
          But why they didn’t give it is another question. I think we have too little information, and the old man mows everything under the offended simplicity: I’m so! And you are like that with me!
          1. +1
            8 October 2016 12: 51
            If you don’t have information, or for whatever reason you don’t want to look for it, it’s absolutely telling about what’s expected, it’s easier to hear a click and repeat any nonsense behind them, BUT it’s hard to learn this
            The Armed Forces of Belarus entered the RGV (regional grouping of troops) with the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. With the same tasks - the defense of the territory. For the Russian Federation, this means joint defense in the western direction. And there is no question of conquest either.

            To whom it is very interesting, here is the Law "On the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus", there is article 2 there, with such an interesting content:
            The activities of the Armed Forces are based on the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus, international treaties of the Republic of Belarus, this Law and other regulatory legal acts of the Republic of Belarus regulating the activities of the Armed Forces.
            If an international agreement of the Republic of Belarus establishes rules other than those contained in this Law, then the rules of the international agreement shall apply.

            And there is article 12:
            The deployment of military personnel outside the Republic of Belarus to fulfill international obligations of the state, to participate in hostilities and peacekeeping operations is carried out in the manner established by legislative acts of the Republic of Belarus and international treaties of the Republic of Belarus.
            MORE harder to grasp this
            Politico-military cooperation between Russia and Belarus is carried out both within the framework of the Treaty on the Creation of the Union State, and in the format of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).

            The basis of such cooperation are several basic documents:

            - The agreement between the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation on military cooperation;
            - Agreement between the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation on the joint provision of regional security in the military sphere;
            - The security concept of the Union of Belarus and Russia (decision of the Supreme Council of the Union of Belarus and Russia of April 28, 1999);
            - The concept of a joint defense policy of Belarus and Russia (decision of the Supreme Council of the Union of Belarus and Russia of January 22, 1998);
            - Military doctrine of the Union State (decision of the Supreme State Council of December 26, 2001).

            The main document is the Military Doctrine of the Union State, which is defensive in nature and aimed at ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of our countries, maintaining the strategic stability of the Union State, creating conditions for a lasting and just peace.
            http://www.souzveche.ru/articles/our-union/25516/
            Well, it’s absolutely impossible for orange clicks to understand this, especially when from the WEST, as the white-orange team goes to bark. So the local team of Russia goes the same team-drive a stake in relations between Belarus and the Russian Federation, between Russians and Belarusians
            http://www.souzveche.ru/articles/our-union/25516/
            1. +5
              8 October 2016 13: 34
              Quote: The Bloodthirster
              The basis of such cooperation are several basic documents:

              It's all great! I would even say: poetic! But the question remains the same? Why was not the Iskander given to dad? Do you think that it is purely natural harm? How much is he willing to pay the ball for them? If he wanted for free, then who should pay? At the expense of which Russian military unit should dad get Iskanders free of charge? And how does the base in Baranovichi agree with the "basic documents"?
          2. +2
            8 October 2016 21: 55
            Lance corporal Valera,
            Not himself, but Russia! Since it is interesting for the West only as our satellite, if it is hit, it is only to weaken the defense of Russia! But why didn’t Iskander be given? There are probably reasons for this, maybe ours are afraid for technology, or maybe they just think that for their tasks it is not needed yet!
            1. +1
              8 October 2016 22: 07
              Quote: You Vlad
              But why didn’t they give Iskander? There are probably reasons for that, m

              Golden words, however! But nobody knows these reasons.
      4. +5
        8 October 2016 12: 03
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Even the Old Man drives a lot lately!

        From the president, who practically imposed the LEGAL LAW on collective farms, one can still not hear.
      5. +4
        8 October 2016 12: 55
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Even the Old Man drives a lot lately!

        Quote: STARPER
        Buy Old Man and place it yourself ....! I cooked well on apples and crabs, and raised the payment for oil transit ..! Do you remember the saying "Greed ruined the frayer ..." ... wassat
        All the same "collective farm" thinking in him .. Rakes everything that is possible.! I made "caches" with a trough in the forests ...?


        )) No need to run into Old Man, he is ours anyway!
    2. +11
      8 October 2016 10: 15
      Now it’s clear why he was going to die for Russia. Iskanders are needed.
      1. avt
        +13
        8 October 2016 10: 25
        Quote: Mitek
        Now it’s clear why he was going to die for Russia. Iskanders are needed.

        laughing ,, Sagittarius bypassed me .. " good just like that, and not like in the heading of the article - DO NOT PLACE, namely, TRANSFER without pay, in vain, at all, and can also pay extra in the form of a loan of yards so by 2, well, pay off previous debts with particularly tight, unlike Russia, lenders .As with the base for the Russian Aerospace Forces, give airplanes to Belarus, and go yourself .. to Belovezhskaya Pushcha to sing a song about it.
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        .Let it buy from Iran.

        A terrible thing happened! The perverse Russia and .... specifically, the oligarchs FORCED poor Lukashenko to defend Russia
        Belarus “was forced to organize the production of the Polonez multiple launch rocket systems”.
        Well, something like exchanging something with the Chinese to get a rocket. bully
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        Or is Lukashenka "cunning"?

        what No, rather an old song about the main thing, he pulled on, but not about "White stork flies ..", but like a child in the children's world, pointing a finger at a toy - "I want-oo-oo-oo-oo! -and-and-! " Promising that he will never be capricious at breakfast and eat everything that will be given, and not some candy with a collection of candy wrappers.
    3. +14
      8 October 2016 10: 16
      According to the president, Belarus offered Russia "to supply Iskander complexes to the republic in connection with the activation of certain forces"

      Well, yes, dad, and it would not hurt to ask a couple of Topolites, and Kuzkin’s mother to boot. wink
      1. +11
        8 October 2016 10: 26
        And I, Grigorych - I support! The article does not talk about what we gave Iskander to him! It can be delivered together with a limited contingent of military personnel of the Russian Federation! And how well they stand there good all around some "friends" !!!
        1. +5
          8 October 2016 10: 33
          Quote: Hunter
          And I, Grigorych - I support!

          Quote: Hunter
          And how good they will stand around there alone "friends" !!!

          is he your friend ??? belay ... such friends to the buoy and to the museum !!
          1. +2
            8 October 2016 11: 28
            Quote: gispanec
            And how good they will stand around there alone "friends" !!!
            is he your friend ??? ... such friends to the buoy and to the museum !!


            The hunter-lover primarily meant the Poles and the Baltic states ...
            The word "friends" was in quotation marks ... hi
            1. +4
              8 October 2016 13: 38
              You don't have to try, these commentators only see what they want to see! And the slogans, our oil, our gas, our gasoline, our weapons, they generally blow away! And try to figure out what's ours ??? When all over the world, oil prices fell, gasoline prices fell! They grew up in Russia, apparently these subsoil owners asked about it! Before the fall in prices, gasoline in Russia was more expensive than in the states, and its quality was much worse, thanks to the government - the dollar was dropped and prices were equalized, was this also asked by the owners of natural resources? Millers, Sechins sell Ours as their own, and worry only about their own and not Our pockets! Our weapon, why do you use it to go to the dacha? How do these Iskandars belong to you personally? Wherever they say - there they will go, under your loud Hurray! Don't flatter yourself. Daddy is building his own economy without any needles of oil, and they live quite well. This already deserves respect! By insulting Grigorich, you are insulting the people who chose him, think about it! We and Belarusians are one people, and we must live in one state! And God forbid, if because of such "owners" we will also lose Belarus! We are obliged to help them - we are part of one nation, at the behest of the Hoddles found ourselves on opposite sides of the border! The white stripe on our flag symbolizes the White Ros! Turn on your brains - Commentators!
        2. avt
          +6
          8 October 2016 10: 37
          Quote: Hunter
          And I, Grigorych - I support! The article does not talk about what we gave Iskander to him! It can be delivered together with a limited contingent of military personnel of the Russian Federation!

          wassat laughing It's really real - blind - "I'll tell you what I see. I don't want to see what is in this world." laughing Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh How is it with the base of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Baranavichy that Batsky demands to transfer Su-30 new ones without pilots, Belarus has its own?
          Quote: dima-fesko
          ... Is it worth hysteria ourselves, and give a reason to hysteria "partners".

          Is this a match designed by Butke !? Then good
          1. +2
            8 October 2016 13: 06
            [quote = avt]
            wassat laughing It's really real - blind - "I'll tell you what I see. But I don't want to see what is in this world":
            Dear, I have a vision of 150% and a military registration specialty, in the same profile! Open the eyes and read by letter, it says "put" and not pass! Do you feel the difference?
    4. +14
      8 October 2016 10: 29
      Lukashenka benefits from today's rhetoric (weak economy - investment from the West, technology, lifting of sanctions, political weight (Minsk-2), etc.). In general terms, the West is satisfied with this at the initial stage (including abandoning the base). But ..... Aerodromes and VVP are maintained in working order. The redeployment time for the Russian Aerospace Forces (say, from Smolensk) is 30-40 minutes. I think the plans of the headquarters have been worked out for a long time. Is it worth hysteria ourselves, and give reason to hysteria "partners" ...... Moreover, the position of Belarusians and Russians in this matter is known, incl. and at the highest level!
      1. +3
        8 October 2016 11: 44
        Thank you, excellent and sober assessment of the situation.
    5. +6
      8 October 2016 10: 46
      So after all, it was only about the placement, and not about the transfer of the base into ownership. If the transfer of ownership was free of charge, he would agree. In general, as far as I understand, Lukashenka is a man with kulak manners - everything is a sabe. He even reads the alphabet not "a, be, ve, ge, de", but "a, would, you, go, yes."
    6. +3
      8 October 2016 11: 03
      This suggests that our leadership does not trust the Old Man and this is an alarming signal for the Old Man
    7. +3
      8 October 2016 11: 22
      Lukashenko criticized the Kremlin for refusing to place Iskander complexes in Belarus

      Well, if father wants so much, give him a couple of sparks, what's the problem? But the person will be calmer.
      1. +5
        8 October 2016 12: 50
        GSH-18
        Well, if father wants so much, give him a couple of sparks, what's the problem? But the person will be calmer.

        fool
        And where will these iskander fly in 5-7 years? Is it not in our direction?
        Therefore, they do not. And the yaks gave in vain.
        Just don’t tell eternal tales about fraternal peoples,
        especially since the people are one.
        1. +1
          8 October 2016 22: 10
          Such complexes will work only with our consent, or will not work in general wink What kind of brothers are we? You said correctly! We are one divided people, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Russians! The main thing for us is to stick together so that we don’t kill one at a time!
    8. +5
      8 October 2016 11: 26
      Quote: Xroft
      and when he was offered to place an air base with our aircraft, what did he refuse?



      It was more cunning ... At the beginning - YONG did not hear anything about the deployment of this air base, although before such a veiled half-failure half a year ahead, the Russian Defense Ministry almost officially presented this issue as resolved ...
      And then he set the condition - not to create a Russian base, but - TRANSFER HIM Russian planes, and his pilots are enough in Belarus ...
      Here such a game was with this base, which ended in a zero result ...

      PS Now it was required to TRANSFER Iskander ... To protect Russia ...
      1. +13
        8 October 2016 12: 45
        I can’t forgive this Lukashenko ....

        I hope I washed my hands from blood after a handshake ...
        1. 0
          8 October 2016 22: 23
          Everybody needs their people laughing Starper, when will your patience run out? To dad drench, to drench Ukrainians, to drench amers, to drench Turks, to drench Jews laughing Who did I forget? You have to go to the front soldier We need a consolidation of forces, and allies, and you pit carefully! What is your purpose, explain to the people?
    9. +1
      8 October 2016 17: 24
      Here it seems to me rather a speech about "give them to us".
  2. +4
    8 October 2016 09: 57
    “In my opinion, 170 paid millions of dollars, took C-300 away, repaired them, modernized it and put it into service,” he said at a meeting with deputies.
    Interestingly, did we deliver the S-300 to Armenia for free?
    If so, why did we offend Belarus in this? Or is Lukashenka "cunning"?
    1. +10
      8 October 2016 10: 13
      Quote: СРЦ П-15
      If so, then why did we offend Belarus in this?

      He’s used to a freebie. We’re good. But Russia is spoiling us. He doesn’t want to give weapons. Let him buy from Iran.
      1. +8
        8 October 2016 10: 18
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        He is used to a freebie.

        This is not about freebies, but about the security of our western borders. And to strengthen it, the S-300 complexes could be delivered free of charge, as in Kazakhstan, if my memory serves me: "Russia supplied Kazakhstan with S-300 air defense systems free of charge to strengthen the Unified Regional Air Defense System," Sergei Shoigu reports to RIA Novosti. "
        So what is worse than Belarusians?
        1. +10
          8 October 2016 10: 28
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          This is not about freebies, but about the security of our western borders.

          Our General Staff thinks about border security! Iskander is quite enough in Kaliningrad.
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          And to strengthen it, the S-300 complexes could be delivered for free,

          And to sell him oil with surcharge
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          , if my memory serves me: "Russia delivered S-300 air defense systems to Kazakhstan free of charge to strengthen the Unified Regional Air Defense System,

          There are no problems with Nazarbayev, but the problem with the freeloader Lukashenko is eternal. All life with outstretched arms. And then he spits in the giver’s hand
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          So what is worse than Belarusians?

          Nothing, you just have to have a conscience.
          1. +9
            8 October 2016 10: 37
            You mixed everything into one heap. And where are the problems with Lukashenka, when the security of the western borders is at stake? We have a Single Air Defense Space! If "One", then the price for all S-300 should be the same - ie. free, as for Armenia and Kazakhstan. Are you not afraid that the Belarusian air defense, when an enemy aircraft approaches, will first ask Russia to pay for its downing? How do you like this option?
            1. +4
              8 October 2016 10: 56
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              What are the problems with Lukashenko when the security of the western borders is at stake?

              And in your opinion it has nothing to do with it. And the General Staff knows better than you what and where to deploy it.
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              Are you not afraid that the Belarusian air defense, upon approaching an enemy aircraft, will first ask you to pay for its downing, Russia?

              Well, from such as Lkashenko one can expect similar. In this case, he can’t deliver anything at all for free. Let him buy from Iran !!!!
            2. +2
              8 October 2016 12: 08
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              Are you not afraid that the Belarusian air defense, upon approaching an enemy aircraft, will first ask you to pay for its downing, Russia?

              I fully admit this option in the case of the free supply of S-300. And dad will always think of paying for it.
        2. avt
          +6
          8 October 2016 10: 43
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          This is not about freebies, but about the security of our western borders. And to strengthen it, the S-300 complexes could be delivered for free, as in Kazakhstan,

          Dig into the memory and find out - Kazakhstan pays with its money, buying equipment for its army and aviation.
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Our General Staff thinks about border security! Iskander is quite enough in Kaliningrad.

          As well as restoring military units in the Smolensk region and the Bryansk region, it will somehow be more reliable.
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          We have a Single Air Defense Space! If "One",

          wassat laughing Exactly that "United" in quotes! There is no analogue of NORAD with a UNIFIED decision-making center, obligatory for execution by the national divisions of independent national states. Instead, a jelly about some kind of "regional air defense" within the CSTO.
      2. +5
        8 October 2016 10: 24
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        He’s used to a freebie. We’re good. But Russia is spoiling us. He doesn’t want to give weapons. Let him buy from Iran.

        Will apples and seafood pay?
        laughing
        1. +6
          8 October 2016 10: 56
          Quote: stalkerwalker
          Will apples and seafood pay?

          Red caviar from the Belarusian Sea wassat
        2. +2
          8 October 2016 12: 11
          Quote: stalkerwalker

          Will be paid by apples

          Of course, Polish.
          1. 0
            8 October 2016 13: 30
            Quote: aleks26
            Of course, Polish.

            Icelandic, Greenlandic and Moldavian.
            1. 0
              8 October 2016 15: 50
              There about apples, they do not grow in Greenland / Iceland
      3. avt
        +1
        8 October 2016 11: 21
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        .Let it buy from Iran.

        Speaking of Iran. But Father didn’t just plan to buy something for himself, but ... to offer some sort of tolling to the Iranians - oil refining at a refinery with walrus as a part of the sale of gasoline there, or just money for work. What Yeong is actually doing now with Russian oil, under which oil refineries were refined in the USSR.
        1. +2
          8 October 2016 13: 38
          Quote: avt
          What Yeong is actually doing now with Russian oil, under which oil refineries were refined in the USSR.

          It is your bigwigs from Slavneft who are twisting and dad has a share.
          Break the union agreement, withdraw from all agreements, finally free yourself from this impoverished, importunate, cunning man of Belarus, remove this damned yoke, why are you so tormented?
          1. avt
            +2
            8 October 2016 15: 48
            Quote: saturn.mmm
            It is your bigwigs from Slavneft who are twisting and dad has a share.

            A-I-I-Yay! Again, Russian oligarchs torture Rygorych - they force oil to process and
            Quote: saturn.mmm
            Old Man has a share.

            laughing Yong tried to jump off to Venezuelan, did the oligarchs really twist their hands? Well, with the Iranian, try through the ukronefteprovod.
            Quote: saturn.mmm
            Break the union agreement, withdraw from all agreements, finally free yourself from this impoverished, importunate, cunning man of Belarus,

            Well, we are not European sadists, we carefully so finally bring into a normal state the desire to be independent Belarus in the reality of this very independence, well, which we feel in practice. - did not believe.
    2. +7
      8 October 2016 10: 24
      Quote: СРЦ П-15
      have we delivered the S-300 to Armenia for free?

      Our military base is there, the complexes stand to defend it, silently covering the airspace of all of Armenia laughing Why should cunning Armenians buy? With Belarus, we also seem to have a single air defense space. But the Old Man is lamented because it’s an offensive weapon, and nuclear (and uncontrolled under strategic offensive arms reduction treaties), you can have a couple with the EU, but generally look more solid in posture. The same Iskander in Armenia (and hardly passed to them) was demonstrated not because of the reach of all the objects of Az-na, including Ilham’s hut, but it scared everyone, as a carrier of tactical nuclear weapons, with a radius of destruction of neighbors ... consider it yourself laughing
      1. +1
        8 October 2016 10: 28
        Quote: hrych
        And about the Iskander, the Old Man laments, so this is an offensive weapon, moreover, nuclear

        Note that this is why I did not mention Iskander in my comments. There should be no conversation here. But with the S-300, not everything is clear. hi
    3. avt
      +3
      8 October 2016 10: 31
      Quote: СРЦ П-15
      Interestingly, did we deliver the S-300 to Armenia for free?
      If so, why did we offend Belarus in this? Or is Lukashenka "cunning"?

      And if you work as a search engine? Well, about the specifics? Firstly, there are de facto and de jure BASES of the Russian Army; Secondly, there local people work and under contract serve in the Army of the Russian Federation. Yes, as it was in Adjara before Comrade Saha .... Ah! What a man! And about the base of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Baranovichi heard something? That’s the whole difference.
      1. +4
        8 October 2016 11: 12
        “In my opinion, they paid $ 170 million, took the S-300, repaired them, modernized and put into service”

        I worked as a search engine -
        “S-300 air defense systems are delivered by Russia at no cost after major repairs with a guarantee of service up to 5-7 years”
        https://topwar.ru/90632-v-belarus-postavleno-3-di
        viziona-kompleksov-s-300.html
        1. avt
          +1
          8 October 2016 11: 26
          Quote: thinker
          I worked as a search engine -

          For sho so But But what? Young generally said that these complexes were found somewhere under a fence in the suburbs. Well, lay ownerless. bully
  3. +9
    8 October 2016 09: 57
    So it turns out: protecting you (Russia), I have to come to you and buy another machine? Is this normal? ”Lukashenka was indignant.
    I would defend myself as a defender.
    Political forgive me ... Lord. Everyone owes him!
    Your neighbors have already played out.
    1. +5
      8 October 2016 10: 19
      Happiness is what. Lukashenko protects us. They would have bombed for a long time, if not for him, our western defender ...
  4. +3
    8 October 2016 09: 59
    Old Man along the West trolls. Type: Russia does not give Iskander for Belarus. Offset!
    1. +6
      8 October 2016 10: 26
      Quote: dr.star75
      Old Man along the West trolls. Type: Russia does not give Iskander for Belarus. Offset!

      Soon he will blurt out, give us "patriots" ..... And they will! And then the "iron dome" into the bargain and everything is "free"! Come on dad dare ... bully We will fight back ... And blackmail, as it is not fraternal! Our life, too, is not sugar, sanctions, etc. .... It’s vile like that, it all looks everything! (no offense)
      1. +2
        8 October 2016 11: 42
        Quote: STARPER
        And to blackmail, as it is not fraternal! Our life, too, is not sugar, sanctions, etc. .... It’s vile like that, it all looks everything! (no offense)

        Sneaky you are speaking ... once you apologized. Mol didn’t understand you so, didn’t you put it .. and here is the same thing?
        You don’t need enemies like you, you’ll break yourself ... Well, finally look for where all these stuffing is formed, who writes them, from which resources, no, too lazy. Blur that, anyhow blab, tongue without bones and corn on finger ...
        1. +3
          8 October 2016 12: 30
          Quote: The Bloodthirster
          Quote: STARPER
          And to blackmail, as it is not fraternal! Our life, too, is not sugar, sanctions, etc. .... It’s vile like that, it all looks everything! (no offense)

          Sneaky you are speaking ... once you apologized. Mol didn’t understand you so, didn’t you put it .. and here is the same thing?
          You don’t need enemies like you, you’ll break yourself ... Well, finally look for where all these stuffing is formed, who writes them, from which resources, no, too lazy. Blur that, anyhow blab, tongue without bones and corn on finger ...

          I apologized to ordinary Belarusians .. But not to Old Man!
          I know that Lukashenka is hated in the West and terribly, and Putin even more! But you don't need to be impudent all the same ..! Russia is already being "milked" by all and sundry ... It's not like a brotherly thing ...!
          Old Man is tricky too already .. And this is all very annoying ....
          We are without Belarus, if we defend ourselves ... There are funds! But so brazenly to blackmail ... And I can still swear briefly explain what's what! hi
          1. +2
            8 October 2016 16: 34
            Quote: STARPER
            We are without Belarus, if we defend ourselves ..

            Ohohoho ... Well, one more sofa strategy ... the state figures of the Russian Federation are already talking to him that Russia needs allies, no, he again pushes an ally back in damned Yeltsin times ... you don’t have time to learn from 90 that Is Russia now a pathetic stub of that Historical Russia?
            You haven’t entered yet, why does Putin fight for the creation of a new form of the Union on the Eurasian expanses? With talkers like you and your kind, you don’t need an enemy, you’ll break everything yourself ...
            Quote: STARPER
            Old Man is tricky too already .. And this is all very annoying ....

            WHO? Potanin with Abramovich? Miller with a promissory note? And what about their irritation? Or are you here at the informative service, are you sending their irritation here?
            Quote: STARPER
            And I can also briefly explain what is what!

            Cover yourself with mat, varnish, then wrap yourself in something and keep quiet.
            1. +2
              8 October 2016 17: 06
              Dear The Bloodthirster! Your position is close to me in many ways, at least on the issue of Belarus! But here the question torments me, why are you rude to these owners of mineral resources, oil, gas, weapons, etc. ??? Nothing depends on their opinion, this is the mass - it supports the party and the government, and tomorrow, by order from the center, it will sing another song! Well, do not explain to them that one people cannot measure everything with money, and that thanks to these commentators, we can lose the brotherly country. Therefore, Calm down and do not be rude, be higher!
      2. 0
        8 October 2016 14: 18
        For those who are in the tank: The Old Man requires: give Iskandera, but we like: no, we won’t. Trolling Europe ... In Kaliningrad, placed. It will be necessary to place in Belarus.
  5. +8
    8 October 2016 09: 59
    Luke, if you are so independent, you must provide for yourself, and not ride on the hump of the Russian Federation.
  6. +13
    8 October 2016 09: 59
    “So what happens: in protecting you (Russia), should I come to you and buy another automatic? This is normal?"

    The president of the neighboring "power" is defending Europe, "give me a penny", this Russia ... Why are they all?
  7. +7
    8 October 2016 10: 02
    we would have time to provide our parts. and then blackmail at all: give, because I'm on your border buffer. than he did not like the air base of the russian federation / cis, call it what you want? It’s stupid to do so, because he sees perfectly how we are trying to provide our army at least somehow with the lack of time and money. they will receive iskander, a little later.
  8. +5
    8 October 2016 10: 03
    Let me remind some "patriots" and by the way "VO leaders" one of the "designations" of OUR FLAG. White color-White Russia, Blue color-GREAT Russia-Red color-Little Russia.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. +8
    8 October 2016 10: 05
    Alexander Lukashenko is not pursuing a consistent policy, if Belarus is properly armed, then where are the guarantees that it will not turn into Ukraine, does it matter that Lukashenko knows very well that in case of war Russia will stand up for Belarusians, and Belarusians will get refuge in Russia
    “So it turns out: protecting you (Russia), I have to come to you and buy another machine? Is this normal? ”Lukashenka was indignant.
    Russia, let alone Russians, has never been defended by anyone. But Russia often harnessed for others, often to its detriment
  11. 0
    8 October 2016 10: 10
    There is logic - there is no sense (To confuse the West ...)
    1. avt
      +3
      8 October 2016 11: 58
      Quote: dima-fesko
      Logic is - no sense

      There is only one logic and meaning here, which Pogrebinsky dreamed of in Ukraine before the Ruins - to be a "bridge" between the West and Russia. BUT - from them the river, and from Russia money and the construction of a "bridge", ... both banks. bully
  12. +9
    8 October 2016 10: 12
    Today Lukashenka, and tomorrow there may be another Poroshenko ... "Partners" work not only in Vukrain and in vain they do not eat bread, as life has shown.
    Today, under Lukashenko, Belarus protects us and thank God, and tomorrow?
    Tell us "Iskander" brothers today, we can get hit by "Iskander" tomorrow from enemies ... And as the saying goes: "God protects the saved."
    Hoping for the best, we will prepare for the worst ... And rightly so. Lukashenko is an intelligent man and a grudge, and our fears in the light of the events in Ukraine should be well understood.
    1. +1
      8 October 2016 11: 39
      What a stupid thing, without noticing it yourself, you have joined the ranks of the enemies, both in Belarus and in the RF, supporting the Belarusian Maidan? And why?
  13. +7
    8 October 2016 10: 20
    The bottom line is that in the first place - he defends his s ...... tsu, without Russian support it will be torn ....
  14. 0
    8 October 2016 10: 33
    Most likely the time has not yet come to place "ISKANDERCHIKI".
  15. +5
    8 October 2016 10: 33
    (“So it turns out: protecting you (Russia), I have to come to you and buy another machine? Is this normal?” Lukashenka was indignant.)
    Well, the AHL has selfish interests in everything. Even the defense of his state is trying to sell at a higher price. If something happens (God forbid, of course), it is so draining into Russia and will ask for compensation for this. Cracker, your mother.
  16. +3
    8 October 2016 10: 35
    Tov Lukashenka -complex "Polonez" was created, so now instead of free "Iskander", create a new complex "Mazurka", or "Krakoviak" and dance to your health.
  17. +6
    8 October 2016 10: 36
    If it were only about the deployment of Iskander in Belarus, but it’s about something else - the transfer of these complexes of the Armed Forces of Belarus into ownership as a gift. Lukashenko, for some reason, believes that Russia is OBLIGED to supply to Belarus everything, from oil, gas to weapons, free of charge or at bargain prices, and in gratitude for this Belarus may not support Russia in its political demarches, such as the recognition of the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia , expressing at the same time solidarity with "maydanuta" Ukraine, to re-export to Russia goods prohibited for import into our country and so on. And with the protection of Russia by Belarus is a big question. I agree with the fact that it serves as a kind of buffer between Russia and NATO in one of the directions, but for the protection of Russia Belarus, in my opinion, is liquidish. If something happens, we will defend Belarus, and not she us.
  18. +4
    8 October 2016 10: 41
    But in the fall, did Father’s move to Gryba? Something sausages it is not childish. laughing
    1. +1
      8 October 2016 11: 00
      Quote: Altona
      But in the fall, did Father’s move to Gryba? Something sausages it is not childish. laughing

      Something "freezes" again before winter ....! laughing Well, damn the collective farm is natural ... It requires gas discounts, in exchange that it will not be given to the West for scolding ..))))) But it will! bully Oh, play out ... negative
  19. +5
    8 October 2016 10: 52
    "" So it turns out: protecting you (Russia), Should I come to you and buy another machine? Is this normal? "- Lukashenka was indignant" ...

    But this is pure speculation ... Natural blackmail ...
    1. +4
      8 October 2016 10: 56
      This is not speculation, this is quite a normal question.
      ALWAYS deliver weapons to an ally to ensure their safety.
      In the end, learn history. You spread out like the Yeltsinists last allies, you can’t give a pot, chop it, and someone else will be to blame.
      1. +1
        8 October 2016 18: 48
        Quote: The Bloodthirster
        Learn the story in the end, spread out like the Yeltsin’s last allies,you can’t give a pot, chop it,and someone else will be to blame.


        Carry your pot yourself so that no one splits it ...
        1. +1
          8 October 2016 18: 55
          Have you already chopped it? Is that why some substance is in the air?
          1. +1
            8 October 2016 19: 10
            Quote: The Bloodthirster
            The Bloodthirster Today, 18:55 ↑
            Have you already chopped it? Is that why some substance is in the air?



            Fisherman further, the grandson of the fellow countryman Gorbachev, and do not sniff ...
            1. +1
              8 October 2016 19: 19
              Fishing is a gift from the gods, life does not count, continue to spoil the atmosphere.
  20. +2
    8 October 2016 10: 54
    The base to organize the Russian, the cheapest option. If you donate, it turns out complete garbage, you never know RB ....
    1. +2
      8 October 2016 11: 38
      Quote: Snob
      If you donate, it turns out complete garbage, you never know RB ....

      You didn’t wonder why all these stuffing, according to the situation around the Republic of Belarus, come only and only from the Maidan people, who are represented here by representatives of the White Communist Party, who are screaming all kinds of nonsense?
      Look how they screamed when two young people blew up the metro in Minsk, how they scream now, find the difference in their statements. There is no difference, and therefore, Maidan’s attempt in the Republic of Belarus, it’s the work of the white-orange position inside the Republic of Belarus and their spiritual mentors outside the Republic of Belarus, grantors mostly Poland, the United States. Well, our liberal gentlemen, coupled with nationalists like Maltsev and the Trotskyites, an unnatural bow at first glance, but frankly showing what is put together in a heap for the Maidan in both Belarus and the Russian Federation.
  21. +3
    8 October 2016 10: 58
    “So what happens: in protecting you (Russia), should I come to you and buy another automatic? This is normal?"

    Is it normal from time to time, as soon as he considers himself offended once again, to drive deliberate stupidity? The guys from Belarus have no complaints about you, but, excuse me, it is time for some people to watch the "bazaar" after all, a whole president.
    1. +2
      8 October 2016 13: 30
      According to the level of corruption, Russia in 2009 ranked 146 out of 180 countries, Belarus the best –139th. Even taking A. Lukashenko critically, it is impossible to blame him for personal selfish interests. The CIA was unable to find his foreign accounts and admitted that in 2005 his annual salary was only $ 27,5 thousand. No large incomes were found among his family members or other leaders of Belarus. But the Russian media have hoarse in protecting the people of Belarus from personal ambitions of A. Lukashenko and are silently silent about the situation with the shadow incomes of the ruling elite of Russia.
  22. +3
    8 October 2016 11: 00
    Something "dad" is cunning, the last time, he began ... Now hydrocarbons, then apples ... It smells like liquid!
  23. +4
    8 October 2016 11: 03
    There is a feeling that they consider us such a big bag with strings, put down his hand, here’s my friend’s iskander on you, put down your hand, you got cheap oil, put it on you, and something else on you.
    And the fact that to give this iskander is to expose somewhere the defense of this bag, there is a feeling that there is no understanding.
    Drop the price, this is a crawling hole in the budget.
    It is understood but that sitting at the keyboard the subtleties are not visible, they know more.
    But the behavior is like a small child, give it all or take offense.
  24. 0
    8 October 2016 11: 07
    he may have an agreement with Putin, and fulfills his role: he’s not happy, like Russia doesn’t like him?
  25. 0
    8 October 2016 11: 16
    “KILL YOURSELF AND BETTER COMRADE”
    Generalissimus A.V. Suvorov
  26. +11
    8 October 2016 11: 22
    Damn the gypsies, they also offered you complexes and planes, but you yourself refused. And now you’re stirring up water. Or are you thinking of placing Iskanders and then demanding that Moscow pay off the debt for Ha'aaz, you know, Sasha, that trick will not work, your gypsy’s GDP has been calculated five steps ahead
    1. +4
      8 October 2016 11: 30
      A very sober and logical comment.
    2. +3
      8 October 2016 11: 33
      "Or are you thinking of placing the Iskanders and then demanding that Moscow pay off the debt for gaaaz."
      It can be assumed that he can sell them (Iskander) and exchange them for bananas. Yeah! Murzilka magazine.
      1. +2
        8 October 2016 11: 52
        Apparently, here readers of the Beloranzhopp murders are obsessed with darkness, they don’t assimilate the arguments of reason, knowing how the capercaillie is flowing one famous song ...
        In, like this ...
        Igor Today, 11:36
        Today we are the Iskanders, and tomorrow he turns his back on us, as was often the case. And the Iskanders will like fans spin in one direction or the other.

        He’s talking about Thomas, and he knows about Yerema, they tell him that all the filkin’s letter of stuffing is against the interests of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus, but he don’t know, assents to the organizers of the Maidan, that we have in Russia, that in Belarus ..
  27. +1
    8 October 2016 11: 36
    Today we are the Iskanders, and tomorrow he turns his back on us, as was often the case. And the Iskanders will like fans spin in one direction or the other.
  28. +2
    8 October 2016 11: 49
    Quote: rotmistr60
    Who first took a hit with a minimum number of weapons and personnel

    The Red Army, consisting of citizens of the USSR. Didn't you know that?
    Bullshit

    Can you explain? Maybe you shouldn’t drive bullshit yourself.

    Citizens of the USSR, yes! But, Belarusian land and civilians are not from Guatemala. And the Old Man asks not to cover his ass, but for the protection of the people and the land of Belarus, and the Russians too. These racquets will fly 1000 km less.
  29. +8
    8 October 2016 11: 52
    Sly Lukashenko contradicts himself.
    Proposal for the deployment of Iskander-M complexes
    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov invited the Belarusian authorities on May 16 during his trip to Minsk.
    But Belarus itself opposes the deployment of Iskander-M missile systems
    Lukashenko wants Russia not to mix its Iskander-M complexes with its specialists, but donated
    moreover, for free!

    Old Man a freeloader, give everything to him, FOR FREE, AS A GIFT, AND THERE WAS NOT GIVING IT WAS, gas, oil, weapons, loans, other preferences, etc.

    https://russian.rt.com/inotv/2016-05-30/EurasiaNe
    torg-Belorussiya-ne-gorit-zhelaniem
    1. +1
      8 October 2016 11: 55
      Yes, everything is fine there, without your advice and screams that the mustache is gone.
      http://www.belvpo.com/ru/32366.html
      We have excellent Presidents, you scream and click, they do their job.
      http://www.pravo.by/main.aspx?guid=12551&p0=C2150
      0967&p1=1&p5=0
      и
      http://static.kremlin.ru/media/acts/files/0001201
      509190001.pdf
  30. +2
    8 October 2016 12: 18
    In my opinion, Old Man is cunning, to defend Russia, such as the BR is protected from all sides, he needs to think about the safety of the BR, and without the RF the BR will not last long. And whose security does he ultimately protect? And talk about protecting the Russian Federation only cover up, farce. And in the end, this crisis will pass. And everything between the Russian Federation and the BR will improve.
  31. +2
    8 October 2016 12: 18
    Here we have a situation, Syria-Assad asks (does not buy) - we give, and Bulbashi- Old Man asks - so beggar? Double standarts? Do not paint it with black paint.
  32. +3
    8 October 2016 12: 34
    Bloodsucker,
    false comments against both Belarus and, in essence, against the Russian Federation.

    Bring at least one. And before you blame me for nationalism, look in the mirror, maybe you'll see something interesting there. You at least read the comments or grab the word and then angry, exposing your diarrhea. I ask you again - are you friends with your head?
    1. +3
      8 October 2016 13: 28
      Why look, if here along this branch you can see your full solidarity with people who are openly hostile to any form of the Union in general and in principle, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus?
      You do not see this, I can’t see it from the outside. Read yourself over again, read the pearls of some representatives here from the so-called white opposition, perhaps you will understand that your sense of logic has changed, your instinct for reality has changed, you have replaced it with a virtual garbage can, slipped to you as " truth "regarding the state of affairs between the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation.
      The tower on the branch has my comment on the account of real relations, in the article about it there is ZERO of information, as the article is called in this case? It’s called-RESET.
      Contradictions between Belarus and Russia: no need to make an elephant out of a fly

      The problem is that modern Russia and Belarus are not two neighboring union republics within the USSR, as it was in 1922-1991, but two independent and independent states with:

      - not only common interests (defense doctrine before NATO, common strategy before the USA and EU countries, common economic space within the framework of the Customs Union, common allies - Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, etc.);

      - but also individual state interests (from business to politics and the interests of individual influential people and groups), between which friction and contradictions naturally arise. If we look at the relationship between Russia and Belarus from this angle, then everything falls into place and he personally does not see any "tragedy" in relations between states, especially if one draws analogies of allied relations, for example, between the United States, Great Britain and Canada, where else there are more frictions between the parties, but their allied relations have been tested for decades and are not "bulging out" by anyone in the world and are simply unknown to many.

      The union of Belarus and Russia is not to the liking of many in the US and the EU:

      - Russia without Belarus will be weaker. Any superpower needs faithful allies, without which it will turn into an ordinary state;

      - Belarus without the support of Russia, the countries of the West would long ago have been made a world outcast, like Iran, Syria, North Korea, Cuba, etc.



      Therefore, the media of Western countries do not accidentally exaggerate the contradictions and suppress a number of strategic foundations of relations between Belarus and Russia.
      Read realities, not stuffing.
      Look for an assessment of unbiased talkers, and experts who understand what is happening.
      http://ru.exrus.eu/Eksperty-pravda-i-lozh-v-otnos
      heniyakh-Rossii-i-Belarusi-id50d37f3b6ccc19905800
      0101
      Well, for thought
      http://krasvremya.ru/uchyonye-o-rossijsko-belorus
      skix-otnosheniyax /
  33. +2
    8 October 2016 12: 37
    Sometimes I don’t understand puck ...
    1. +4
      8 October 2016 12: 51
      Sometimes I don’t understand puck ...

      You can be envied that only sometimes you do not understand. Here at times it seems that he himself does not understand then.
      1. +3
        8 October 2016 13: 18
        In one of the articles, you gave an absolutely competent comment to a certain Frenchman, for the fifth day amusing the audience with his hallucinations, now what’s cheating on you, logic, not knowledge of reality, blind faith in a natural stuffing directed against Russia in the first place and against Belarus in the second?
        Are you sure you do not understand the situation, or are you sure that you understand everything "correctly"?
        1. +1
          8 October 2016 13: 27
          What kind of stuff are you talking about if all Lukashenka’s speeches are broadcast by the media. And the dispute between us and you came after I wrote that the Red Army, consisting of citizens of the USSR, took the first blow. Then I wrote that it is not necessary to divide the losses in the Second World War by nationality. What is the problem?
          1. +1
            8 October 2016 16: 26
            Develop eyes.
            You have a stuffing article in front of your eyes, with comments of some kind of blessed one, who gives out his muesli, for Lukashenko’s thoughts.
            Read on, what is written, or is there no strength and conscience to admit that among the republics of the USSR, Belarusians have lost a lot? And there is absolutely nothing to do with the division by nationality.
    2. +4
      8 October 2016 14: 21

      sabakina
      Sometimes I don’t understand puck ..

      Lukashenko showed his true nature at the time of the reunification of Crimea with Russia. Lukashenko’s first reaction was very unequivocal and clearly anti-Russian. Look for
      Still need to search on the topic of Litvinization of Belarus. There is a lot of material and very indicative.
      Before Crimea, I also believed Lukashenko.
  34. +3
    8 October 2016 13: 08
    A hypocrite and a beggar - first of all you defend yourself, without Moscow Lukashenko will be quickly cleaned up like Gaddafi. I’m ashamed, my friend.
    1. +3
      8 October 2016 13: 13
      Quote: Umnichka
      Umnichka

      With such a nickname, so stupid to speak out? Surprisingly ...
  35. +2
    8 October 2016 13: 10
    So it turns out: protecting you (Russia), I have to come to you and buy another machine? This is normal?

    What about yourself?
  36. +7
    8 October 2016 13: 21
    All the same, what are you Russian eccentrics. As our president agrees in everything with the opinion of Russia, then you are here on the forum to him just a monument in life do not put. As soon as the AG voices its opinion different from Russia, then you immediately brand the last words. You already decide whether you are alone against the whole world or not all alone. And each nation and its leader can and should have its own opinion. And then you all want everyone to dance to your tune and the enemy and friend and brother.
    1. +6
      8 October 2016 14: 05
      In your place, I would not pay attention to half the comments of members of the forum .... because they do not reflect in any way the attitude of Russians to citizens of the Republic of Belarus.
      It is clear that the interests of Belarus and the Russian Federation in terms of trade, monetary relations, etc. can diverge. And this is normal !!! Even in everyday life when 2 relatives start a joint business, they have disagreements and even conflicts. But in the end they are one family. I propose to leave politics to politicians and simply at the level of peoples strengthen mutual relations as it was before.
    2. +3
      8 October 2016 15: 48
      Quote: viking1703
      All the same, what are you Russian eccentrics

      this is generally characteristic of all people, regardless of nation. We and they (we are good they are bad) psychology.
      In general, Belarusians, I do not envy you now - you took the place that we had. The main thing here is to keep cool. We with our temperament could not stand it for a long time. You can do it. Emotions can and easily destroy everything.
      1. +4
        8 October 2016 17: 52
        I do not want to offend anyone with a comment. We are all close nations, but the mentality of the Ukrainians is Polish and the Belarusians are about the same. I talked more with the Ukrainians than the Belarusians, but the conversation about what they feed, clothe, supply Russia I hear often. And the type of kerdyk without us was often heard. Well, how are you now living in a parallel universe?
        1. +1
          8 October 2016 20: 08
          Quote: Anton Yu
          I do not want to offend anyone with a comment. We are all close nations, but the mentality of the Ukrainians is Polish and the Belarusians are about the same. I talked more with the Ukrainians than the Belarusians, but the conversation about what they feed, clothe, supply Russia I hear often. And the type of kerdyk without us was often heard. Well, how are you now living in a parallel universe?

          Nationalism is what you want. But in Russia, too, they believe that everyone is obliged to her. The main thing is not to switch to emotions, and even from the brothers you can make deadly enemies.
          In the end, the USSR is already a quarter of a century, and Russia, Ukraine and Belarus have proved their viability as sovereign states.
          1. 0
            9 October 2016 08: 32
            The feud between nations is inflated mainly by the media. Yes, a quarter century has passed and some states have not decided who to be friends with. Only a small number of states managed to make friends with them and us over the 20th century. And nobody likes it. Draw the right conclusions, not build illusions.
    3. +1
      8 October 2016 20: 05
      I really hope that your words will be heard.
  37. +2
    8 October 2016 13: 34
    Quote: Operator
    Belarus, as an accomplice to the Bandera regime, should be excluded from the general economic space and supplied with oil and gas at market prices.

    And stop buying any products in Belarus, because nafig is not needed in Russia.

    An example of bullshit!
  38. +2
    8 October 2016 13: 36
    Quote: Umnichka
    A hypocrite and a beggar - first of all you defend yourself, without Moscow Lukashenko will be quickly cleaned up like Gaddafi. I’m ashamed, my friend.

    You are a small, unreasonable child or a provocateur!
  39. +4
    8 October 2016 13: 57
    Let's put everything in place. 1. Old Man came to us, and not to the amers. 2. Asks us, not amers. 3. He will fight with us, and not against us. 4. In the trench, bread will be shared with us, not with ameri. Also, what should he do to make us like, to dance? Judging by some statements in this topic, a Zulu passerby knocked on us and asked a lot. And here we are blue blood with such not hobble. So what? We are one! Do not forget about the trenches!
    1. 0
      8 October 2016 14: 17
      There is an opinion that in the event of a real threat to the Republic of Belarus, all necessary means will be transferred there within XNUMX hours, from air defense assets to Iskander. Therefore, I believe that you don’t need to ask for anything, because in the event of a real conflict everything will be delivered as it is (for free).
      I think Old Man understands this anyway, and his words are simple politics.
      1. 0
        9 October 2016 13: 21
        Well, yes ... It's just politics ... Why is he then buying Polonaises. on which from the BR only the car. Personally, I get the impression that father did not gather with Europe, but with us to fight. And ours - they see it, they offered him our units with Iskanders and an entire air base. To which they gave us a clear answer that you don’t need us. What's the problem, our military base would give more security.
  40. The comment was deleted.
  41. +4
    8 October 2016 14: 03
    SERHJ,

    Dear ophthalmologist! I will tell you a terrible secret, vision can be higher than one! Consult a doctor. For all other questions I answered above, there will be a desire to read!
  42. +1
    8 October 2016 14: 23
    Father’s requests are a demonstration to the West with whom he is!
  43. +2
    8 October 2016 14: 24
    Grisha, of course, is not Petenka-, but even pearls in the spirit of Chernomyrdin sometimes pop up from him ...
  44. The comment was deleted.
    1. +4
      8 October 2016 16: 23
      Are you talking about yourself? Really ...
  45. 0
    8 October 2016 17: 11
    Oh, this dad :))
  46. +3
    8 October 2016 17: 18
    A nefig on three chairs to sit both yours and ours and trope for CEE. Such people have never been and never will be respected.
  47. The comment was deleted.
  48. +2
    8 October 2016 18: 26
    Quote: Lator Kron
    A nefig on three chairs to sit both yours and ours and trope for CEE. Such people have never been and never will be respected.

    Based on your (yes, with a small letter) sayings, we also sit on three chairs and with Europe there was a desire, and with China, and with the Turks, and with Ukrainians .... do you understand my logic? His policy is the same as ours! He did not betray us and does not betray. He is looking for opportunities to survive, like us! How is he worse than us or how are we better than him? Behind him is his country, his people and HE with US !!!
  49. +5
    8 October 2016 18: 44
    I don’t even want to criticize Alexander Grigoryevich, since he is the chairman of the collective farm, IQ has a collective-farm chairman, and he means that he turned the whole country, Belarus, into a nominal collective farm.
  50. +1
    8 October 2016 19: 59
    for especially gifted chants "Lukashenko betrayed the Russian world" I would like to note that these Iskanders were supposed to be controlled by the Russian military. So the claims should not be made against Lukashenko
  51. +1
    8 October 2016 21: 39
    “So it turns out: protecting you (Russia), I have to come to you and buy another machine? Is this normal? ”Lukashenka was indignant.

    Пока он президент независимой республики,а не президент республики Белорусь в составе РФ ,типа Татарстана ,вот в последнем случае он и получит ВСЕ что надо, и надо будет в перспективе . soldier
    1. 0
      8 October 2016 22: 41
      Поправлю вас, пишется через "а"Республика Беларусь. wink
      1. +4
        8 October 2016 22: 57
        Quote: ruskih
        Поправлю вас, пишется через "а"Республика Беларусь. wink

        Тов. Рускин. Не сочтите за труд, объясните мне, недалекому, чем отличается Белоруссия от Беларуси. Это бздик какой, или направо?
        1. 0
          9 October 2016 09: 13
          Нет, это не бздик. Разницы между Белоруссия и Беларусь для меня нет, но есть официальное написание Республика Беларусь, поэтому по доброму поправила. В своих комментариях я употребляю оба названия. Мой ник "русских". Лить грязь на страну в угоду некоторым комментаторам, не буду. Для меня ближе вот такие взаимоотношения:
  52. +1
    8 October 2016 22: 13
    Lance corporal Valera,
    Вы или нет,мне как то не интересно-но вот кляузы писать админам,мол спасите,обидели,оскорбили-сушая подлость-НЕТ аргументов,неуважаемый?
    Не конкретно Вам,если не от вас исходило,но тем не менее-подловато себя ведете.
  53. +1
    8 October 2016 22: 42
    Lance corporal Valera,
    А зачем вам их знать? winked Это стратегическое оружие,и Батьке оно пока не нужно!Будет жарко Искандер будет стоять в Белоруссии тоже,но с нашими расчётами! Что он его хочет, это можно понять lol Политика сэр не чего личного.
  54. +1
    8 October 2016 22: 58
    Lance corporal Valera,
    А зачем вам их знать? winked Это стратегическое оружие,и Батьке оно пока не нужно!Будет жарко Искандер будет стоять в Белоруссии тоже,но с нашими расчётами! Что он его хочет, это можно понять lol Политика сэр не чего личного.
  55. +1
    8 October 2016 23: 42
    Лукашенко из доверия вышел. "искандеры" ведь можно и продать. А где они потом окажутся неизвестно.
    Кровопийца случаем не Monja?
    1. +2
      9 October 2016 08: 39
      Если учитывать тесное сотрудничество ВПК Белоруссии и Украины ясно, где они потом окажутся.
  56. The comment was deleted.
  57. +1
    9 October 2016 03: 46
    Дружба-дружбой , в за "искандеры" платить надо !!!
    1. +1
      9 October 2016 08: 41
      ОТРК это наступательное оружие и есть много ограничений по его экспорту.
  58. +1
    9 October 2016 05: 15
    А зачем Батьке Искандер? Он видимо не совсем четко представляет его назначение в случае конфликта.
  59. +1
    9 October 2016 06: 07
    hrych,
    Плюс из нефтяных продуктов делают пластмассу. В нашем мире это значимый продукт, крайне значимый.
  60. +1
    9 October 2016 06: 48
    Защитничек нашёлся. Он же продал америкашкам С-300, а те его разобрали, для изучения. Продай беларусам "Искандер", они и его продадут. Иметь таких союзничков и врагов не надо.
    1. +1
      9 October 2016 08: 50
      Украина слила вообще всё : танки, самолеты, двигатели, ракеты, радары, корабли и прочее, даже не имея прав на эти технологии. Это были 90-е годы, величайшая трагедия для наших народов.
  61. 0
    9 October 2016 09: 48
    Прискорбно слышать подобное от главы моего государства. Однако, другого нет... И неизвестно, какой бы был этот "другой"...
  62. 0
    9 October 2016 23: 18
    Quote: The Bloodthirster
    почему бензин,марки 95,стоит
    in US dollars-Venezuela-0,01, Saudi-0,24, Turkmenistan-0,28, Ku
    Gate 0,34, Nigeria 0,45
    RUSSIA-0,61? You will translate into rubles yourself, the price in RB-0,62.
    Why is that?

    Если у вас почему-то заужен кругозор и вы не желаете палец о палец ударить, чтобы воспользоваться поиском, то вот для вас открытие большой тайны: США добывает нефти не меньше, чем Россия, при этом затраты на добычу и транспортировку значительно ниже.
    Дальше объяснять нужно по Венесуэле, Саудитам и Нигерии?

    А вот почему вы не удивляетесь, что в Белоруссии и России цена одинакова, но при этом Белоруссия не добывает нефть, а получает её за хрен знает сколько километров из северных регионов России при немаленькой цене эксплуатации трубопроводов?
  63. 0
    10 October 2016 07: 36
    Помните МММ, laughing "Не халявшик я, а "партнер"". Не желаешь покупать -- так сделай сам и не проси, lol А подставлять под удар свою страну в погоне за "Искандером", как то так сказать - не умно. what

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"