In Tula, developed a new antenna for the marine "shell"

A new phased array antenna (PAR) has been developed at the Central Design Bureau of Instrument Making, which allows to double the target detection range by the Pantsir Marine Anti-aircraft Complex, reports RIA News a message from the chief designer of the enterprise, Alexander Khomyakov.

“The detection station will detect the target at a distance of up to 70 kilometers. Targeting will be increased to 40 kilometers ",

said the chief designer told reporters.

At the present time, the marine ZRPK "Pantsir" has not yet been adopted.

Earlier, the Defense Ministry reported that state tests of the complex are scheduled for the last months of the current year. The upgraded complex will be installed on a wide class of warships - from small rocket corvettes to large anti-submarine ships.

Comments

[Monos]

I would put myself on the roof like that.

[gispanec]

Quote: Monos

I would put myself on the roof like that.

Nope .... better torus on the roof ..... by the way I have been dreaming for a long time .... 10th floor ... next to the Telecentre ... if you miss it and it arrives at me ... that's the torus ....

[Hunt]

Excuse me, are you only interested in the antenna or the whole complex? I think they will deliver to Nakhimov with the new headlamp, the air defense of the ship will seriously increase!

[Monos]

Quote: Hunter

Excuse me, are you only interested in the antenna or the whole complex? I think they will deliver to Nakhimov with the new headlamp, the air defense of the ship will seriously increase!

Of course the whole complex! Why do I need one antenna? Airplanes over Sheremetyevo admire?

[gispanec]

Quote: Hunter

Excuse me, are you only interested in the antenna or the whole complex?

if you write an answer to a person, then for what do you want to answer the first ?? ... that would stand higher and pick up the pros .... vegetable!

[st25310]

Comrade Major, don't be upset! Ranks are still not real ...

[uskrabut]

Quote: st25310

Ranks are still not real

How not real? And why the heck then did I sew epaulettes on the bush?

[Hunt]

Quote: gispanec

if you write an answer to a person, then for what do you want to answer the first ?? ... that would stand higher and pick up the pros .... vegetable!

You yourself understood what you wrote ??? I asked a person a question, he, unlike you, understood and answered! Drink a sedative pill and do not measure people on your own, half-Turk!

[gispanec]

Quote: Hunter

I asked a person a question, he, unlike you, understood and answered! Drink a sedative pill and do not measure people on your own, half-Turk

you asked a person a question man quote "

Quote: Monos

I would put myself on the roof like that.

your question to him "Sorry, you are only interested in the antenna or the whole complex? "so who is a half-turk ?? your question was about the nickname - avg-mgn ... he wrote about the antenna ... and his comments are at the very bottom ... so the potatoes are overripe smile ... you shit!

[Hunt]

Quote: gispanec

Quote: Hunter

I asked a person a question, he, unlike you, understood and answered! Drink a sedative pill and do not measure people on your own, half-Turk

you asked a person a question man quote "

Quote: Monos

I would put myself on the roof like that.

your question to him "Sorry, you are only interested in the antenna or the whole complex? "so who is a half-turk ?? your question was about the nickname - avg-mgn ... he wrote about the antenna ... and his comments are at the very bottom ... so the potatoes are overripe smile ... you shit!

It is difficult to communicate with a person who has no brain, an article about the antenna and not about the complex itself! Therefore, I asked MONOS and, with humor, what exactly interests him! He understood this the first time and answered with humor! The question is, from what time and after how much time - will you understand this ??? Have another pill!

[avg-mgn]

If we take into account that the phased array is used, and not the AFAR, then this is a very significant step, since the potential laid down in the phased array of the complex was almost fully realized at the development stage and there was already nothing to squeeze.
Respect for developers.

[Inok10]

Quote: avg-mgn

Respect for developers.

... I join ... but as a consequence of the article on SOC:

“The detection station will detect a target at a range of up to 70 kilometers. Guidance on the target will be increased to 40 kilometers "

... that means we will see a new missile defense system on the firing module ... or did you decide to screw the Hermes to the Pantsir-M? ... and for sure the "news" came from "beyond the river" that the mattress toppers are finishing their supersonic anti-ship missiles based on the SM-6 starting from the Mk 41 ...

Quote: kirieeleyson

That's how short-range air defense systems turn into a medium-range shield. I applaud, all the same, they brought the performance characteristics to the calm, in practice.

... the affected area is pushed as far away as possible and saturated with the means of destruction ... since for the CC with an EPR of 0,05 and a height of 5-10 m, 50-70 km. this is just the line of sight of the SOC (depends on the height of the SOC) ...

[NEXUS]

avg-mgn

If we take into account that the phased array is used, and not the AFAR, then this is a very significant step, since the potential laid down in the phased array of the complex was almost fully realized at the development stage and there was already nothing to squeeze.

It would be nice right after the acceptance and the marine version in emergency mode is then planed ...

[Alex777]

I suppose when they talk about the "sea" Shell, they mean the sea version of Shell-SM. The antenna is 70 km away.
By the way, there was a rumor that it was two-way. Which is also very good.
Accordingly, a rocket at such a range (40 km) will fly only from the SM. Great rocket!

[Simple]

Quote: avg-mgn

If you consider that it is used PAR, not AFAR, t

I didn't understand your "thought" ...
HEADLIGHT better than AFAR?
So for reference
On later versions, ZRAK has been standing for a long time 1PC2-1E "Helmet"


"Roman" 1L36-01 developed by MNII "Agat" stood at 1x in the distant 90s (ROC "Roman" by order of the USSR Air Defense began in June 1990)


AFAR is much better in terms of security, power consumption, multi-frequency and so on.
But here it is not needed, and it’s expensive, and we don’t have the AFAR of the required dimension / mass (for sure on the stream)

Quote: Author

“The detection station will detect the target at a distance of up to 70 kilometers. Targeting will be increased to 40 kilometers ",

The fact that we were refused with the NATO SOC, it seems ours did, spitting on the copyright

Target detection radar 1RS1-1Е (1РЛ123-Е) truncated "Furke-E" version of the 2 S-band

[Inok10]

Quote: Just

The fact that we were refused with the NATO SOC, it seems ours did, spitting on the copyright
Target detection radar 1RS1-1Е (1РЛ123-Е) truncated "Furke-E" version of the 2 S-band

... You are not lost an hour in time? ... 1RS1-1E? ... a long-time bilateral AFAR ... photo of May 9 of this year Kaliningrad ...

[Simple]

Quote: Inok10

... You are not lost an hour in time?

Yes, I didn’t notice .. I’m not Rudolf Fents

Quote: Inok10

long-term bilateral AFAR ... photo 9 of this year Kaliningrad

"Double-sided AFAR" - must be .. horror then what
1. RLS: 1RS1-1Е and 1RS2
Radar Type: Dual-Band Three-Axis
Antenna Type: HEADLIGHT
Range: cm / mm (tracking channel) and cm (detection channel)
Viewing azimuth (detection / tracking): 60 / 45 degrees (360 due to mechanical rotation)
Viewing angle (detection / tracking): 60 / 45 degrees
Range (EPR 2 m?) (Detection / tracking): 36 / 30 km [2]
Optoelectronic tracking system: yes
Field of View: 1,8 x 2,7 degrees
Modes: Auto / Manual
Distance: 18 km

2. Why is 96K6 TWO-SIDED?
Turn on the brain (if any)
3. And the speech (in the article) is not about radar target detection, but about SOC

Target tracking radar and missile guidance with phased array of millimeter and centimeter ranges 1PC2 / 1PC2-1E "Helmet",

Quote: Author

«Detection station will detect the target at a distance of up to 70 kilometers. Targeting will be increased to 40 kilometers, ”the chief designer told reporters.

In other matters for you, it doesn't matter, since the photos brought

"near Kaliningrad", but at least near Alepo
===========================================
The Book of Poverty and Wealth, 1724

[Inok10]

Quote: Just

Yes, I didn’t notice ..

... gave a reference daughter navigate in time ...

Quote: Just

"Double-sided AFAR" - must be .. horror then what
1. RLS: 1RS1-1Е and 1RS2

... yeah, what a terrible thing 1RS1-1E has long sunk into the summer ... two canvases of SOC AFAR in fact in reality, and not in your parallel universe ...

Quote: Just

2. Why is 96K6 TWO-SIDED?
Turn on the brain (if any)

... once again try to cheat, give it to the moderator ...

Quote: Just

3. And the speech (in the article) is not about radar target detection, but about SOC

... the essence of the "letters" that you write you need to know ... detection radar and target detection station, It is the same ... For an hour you messed up an object with a finger ... SOC and SSC ...

Quote: Just

"near Kaliningrad", but at least near Alepo

... we learn spelling anew and we are not mistaken in geographical names ... ... in Syria, tell me where? ...
... and it is also a photo ... for the "lost in time" - "Carapace C2" ...

[Inok10]

Quote: Just

“Pravdinsk Design Bureau” (JSC “PKB”) inform

... for rudeness I sent to the moderator ... and, for all normal comrades in VO, photos from production ... as they say clearly ... two canvases AFAR SOC ...

[Alex777]

Nice pic!
About the two-sided antenna SOTs heard, but had not seen before.

[gispanec]

for a lover to kill animals - rubbed on his finger mazol when trying to answer? since he put Obama in his underpants, so don’t bother that you’re an eagle ... the habit of standing in comments higher for conditional pluses has developed your cerebellum from left to right ...

[Hunt]

Quote: gispanec

for a lover to kill animals - rubbed on his finger mazol when trying to answer? since he put Obama in his underpants, so don’t bother that you’re an eagle ... the habit of standing in comments higher for conditional pluses has developed your cerebellum from left to right ...

Farted and satisfied ??? Dumb, you teach your life wife, if you have one! Somehow I’ll manage without your advice on how to spend my free time, what and where to write! And you continue to fart, I even became interested!

[kirieeleyson]

That's how short-range air defense systems turn into a medium-range shield. I applaud, all the same, they brought the performance characteristics to the calm, in practice.

[Alex777]

And when everyone will be in service - the modernization of the fleet will go very quickly and efficiently. Put 2 Shell - this is not Calm to embed.

[Titsen]

When instead of DEVELOPING, we STARTED TO DEVELOP, DESIGNING, we will begin to read DELIVERED TO THE MILITARY SERVICE, STARTED BATTLE DUTY, AND WALK IN MILITARY SERVICE ...

[JD1979]

At the present time, the marine ZRPK "Pantsir" has not yet been adopted.

IMHO. He needs the fifth leg as a dog, even in the ME variant, which has the same automatic weapons as on the Cortic. And how will the Dirk actually differ from the Shell, with missiles ?. And for the adoption of the armament with land double-barreled automatic weapons ...., they must also be shot through, for it is impossible to come up with a more idiotic Downgrade. Hence the question again drank dough for the invention of a bike? They will not hang a prize for modernization of the existing marine SPACES with the same antenna, diploma, for the invention of a new complex, and prizes with medals on the chest, but I really want to.

[Alex777]

When you don’t understand anything, how difficult it is for you to live and write.
To begin with: who made the Dirk. and who makes the shell?
On the "sea" Carapace are 6-barreled Broadsword cannons.
They were made by their design bureau. Nudelman. AO-18KD are called.
Especially for you - there is nothing better in the world.
The letter D is because the trunks are longer than on the AK-630.
New shells for them were made this year.
The initial speed increased by 10-15%. The survivability of the trunks - 3 times.
Rest and don’t worry!
On the Dagger AO-18.
BM Cortica - single-channel for targets, Shell - four-channel.
The firing range and everything else is much better with the Shell.

[JD1979]

When you don’t understand anything, how difficult it is for you to live and write

That's right, when he does not understand anything, it is very difficult for you.

On the "sea" Carapace are 6-barreled Broadsword cannons.

Yeah, the version of the Shell-ME, Since the Shell-M, this is actually a land variant with GSh-30 (2A38M) trunks.

They were made by their design bureau. Nudelman. AO-18KD are called.

What? Product indices, assigned upon adoption, MO and KB indices are, as it were, different. And the KB index - GSH-6-30KD seems to you about anything? If you are such a connoisseur, then it’s a shame not to know the authors of almost all anti-aircraft guns currently in use in air defense and airborne systems. Design Instrument Design Bureau named after A.G. Shipunova and PO Tulamashzavod. And KB them. Nudelman tried to construct on the basis of these guns ZRAK Broadsword (Palma), as a competitor to the product of Instrument Design Bureau - Kortik-M (with the same GSh-6-30KD), but nothing good came of it, the requirements of the TTZ were not fulfilled and there was no option with missiles at all there were only pictures.

Quote: Alex777

Especially for you - there is nothing better in the world.

Sorry, getting a ban on Google is a tragedy. Especially for you - it is better to eat. To understand, you need to have at least basic ideas about the topic of discussion, but you do not have them. Therefore, relax and do not worry! and look further at Carbon Monoxide.
From off. site: "The high rate of fire of artillery weapons with a burst duration of 1,2 s allows for effective destruction of targets to the 300-500 m line." 300-500 !! meters, which is outstanding at a frantic rate of fire up to 12k per minute. It's just that there are no other machines and there is no desire to admit that they got screwed when the TTZ was developed. That the trunks are accurate in accuracy, that the location is stupid and the recoil momentum is not synchronized in any way, that the aiming drives are much worse than those of their counterparts in the west, it has been known for a long time, only that we have not heard about the development of new barrels in accuracy that is not inferior to at least Vulcan how old is that. One hope for rockets. As seen in the shooting. And the military themselves have repeatedly admitted that the accuracy of the complex is lame on both legs. Secretly: And there will be no such barrels, because we cannot make such a steel grade and we need a little more money than storage for the research of materials and manufacturing technology, not counting the equipment for making the barrels themselves.

The letter D is because the trunks are longer than on the AK-630.
New shells for them were made this year.

Links? complex Kortik-M was already in 2000. For the first time, it seems to have been installed on the "Guarding" TFR pr.20380 in 2008. Data on the initial velocity of the projectiles has been available since 2010.

BM Cortica - single-channel for targets, Shell - four-channel.
The firing range and everything else is much better with the Shell.

Do not confuse, as Oper said, warm with soft. BM is BM, and a complex is a complex. And in the maximum configuration, a complex with 6 BMs fires 6 targets at the same time., Although BM itself is yes, single-channel.
The range of fire and everything else is much better with the Shell? Which is actually a Cortic M with radar, electronics and missiles from the Shell-C1? it is urgent for you to buy a lip-feeding machine.
Quote: "At the IMDS-2011 maritime salon in St. Petersburg, a model of the Pantsir-ME complex is shown, which is a Kortik-M ZRAK model with elements of the Pantsir-S1 ZRAK radar equipment

The article does not reveal topics from the word at all. Creating the impression that the Sea Shell and the land are almost the same, as it is in the original version of the Shell-M with double-barreled atomatomats, but the Shell-ME, this is a completely different complex where the base is the Marine ZRAK Shell-M (Kashtan-M).

[Alexey RA]

The detection station will detect the target at a range of up to 70 kilometers. Guidance on the target will be increased to 40 kilometers

But all this will only happen if the enemy agrees to fly at medium altitudes and not descend to the MV and PMV. Because our land is round, and no one has yet canceled the radio horizon.

[avg-mgn]

Quote: NEXUS

It would be nice right after the acceptance and the marine version in emergency mode is then planed ...

Old man, you said what I thought and hinted. 40 range - detection of 60-70, up to 2 sec (max) for processing until the target enters the affected area and a decision is made. Agree, without a handicap it was worse in 30-40km! Thank you for understanding. Designers respect.

[NEXUS]

avg-mgn

Designers respect.

It's too early for now ... let the state test pass, and let it go into the series, then we'll be happy. And if the marine version is quickly created, then the joy will be double.

[avg-mgn]

Quote: Alex777

Put 2 Shell - this is not Calm to embed.

Perhaps you have read that in an article. I used to see it, it hurt in the horns before, the constructor, be healthy!

[Alex777]

I talked about the modernization of 956 and 1155.
About what you mumble - I can not imagine.

[magician]

Once again, Tula proved that she had the right to bear the name, the name of the city of gunsmiths. KBP hello, health subcontractors!)))

[mr.redpartizan]

Why should a short-range air defense system shoot down targets at a distance of 40 km? There are other complexes for this. For ship near-range air defense systems, reaction speed, multichannel, noise immunity and the number of missiles in the complex are important.

[Alex777]

Why should a short-range air defense system shoot down targets at a distance of 40 km?

KBP proactively developed a complex with a range of 10km.
And development at first up to 20 km, and now up to 40 km - life required (or the customer - as you like).
Thor began to work much better after "deep testing" (learning) of the armor's targeting algorithms. I understand that KBP is a shame. But for the defense of the country it is useful. The further we shoot down, the better.
Suggest a complex that can shoot down missiles used as anti-ship missiles? And by the way, 2 Sea Sparrow "accidentally released" by the Americans easily destroyed a Turkish frigate. And what to do with the SM-6 anti-ship missiles? To shoot down the Fort with rockets?

There are other complexes for this.

For example?

[Haloperidol]

I hope this system will turn out to be more combat-ready than outright rubbish called the Redoubt air defense system, which does not work, but with stubbornness worthy of better use, they continue to install it on ships, which frankly smells of deliberate sabotage, sabotage and treason.

[Alex777]

Quote: Haloperidol

I hope this system will turn out to be more combat-ready than outright rubbish called the Redoubt air defense system, which does not work, but with stubbornness worthy of better use, they continue to install it on ships, which frankly smells of deliberate sabotage, sabotage and treason.

The disruption (in your terminology) was the disbandment of Altair.
Redoubt's problems are the consequences of this decision.

[Zomanus]

Pleased with such news. Such a complex can not only shoot itself,
but also to carry out target designation for other complexes.