Military Review

Media: Pentagon ready to attack Tomahawks Syrian military airfields

203
The American media write that the White House and the Pentagon are discussing the possibility of implementing the so-called "Plan B" for Syria. By “Plan B”, as is known, is meant striking the Syrian government forces. And a blow to the positions of the SAR army in the Deir-ez-Zor area against the background of such messages looks like a kind of “attempt at writing”, although in the USA they continue to persistently repeat about the “accidental mistake”.

Newspaper The Washington Post It comes out with material about the meeting at the White House, to which the leaders of the US law enforcement agencies and intelligence services were invited. In particular, the meeting was attended by the director of the CIA, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and other representatives of the generals of the American army. In addition, the event was held with the participation of representatives of the State Department.

One of the topics touched upon in the conversation was the possibility of attacking Syrian military airfields with cruise missiles and other long-range weapons on the runways. The discussion was conducted on the principles of circumventing the decisions of the UN Security Council, which is not the first time for the United States.

Media: Pentagon ready to attack Tomahawks Syrian military airfields


The material states that the American security forces are in favor of "Plan B". And this is an open invasion of Syria while simultaneously declaring war on Syrian government forces. In fact, this is the main confirmation that the United States is the main sponsor of international terrorism.

In this situation, you can make an assumption of the following nature: The United States may well send Syrian positions and "coalition" aircraft to the bombardment. A bomber, for example, of Denmark (as in the case of Deir ez-Zor), on orders from the Pentagon, can inflict an airstrike on Syrian troops in order to assess the likelihood of a "response" from air defense systems, including the Russian C-300. If the plane is shot down, the “democratic” howl will rise, under which further military actions by the American “hawks” will already advance. If the plane is not shot down, the result will be the same, but only for the "democratic" howl will find other reasons.
Photos used:
vilingstore.net
203 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey K
    Andrey K 5 October 2016 13: 40
    +13
    Media: Pentagon ready to attack Tomahawks Syrian military airfields

    And what will Comrade S-300 say to this? laughing
    Regarding the "readiness" of the Pentagon ...
    There is a wonderful film: "Prisoner of the Caucasus":
    My great-grandfather says: I have a desire to buy a house, but I have no opportunity.
    I have the opportunity to buy a goat, but I have no desire.
    So let's drink so that our desires coincide with our capabilities.

    - Well done.
    - So.
    - Listen to another toast.
    - So...
    (C)
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 5 October 2016 13: 43
      +3
      Media: Pentagon ready to attack Tomahawks Syrian military airfields

      Want to play with fire? Well, well, just let them not forget that you can get burned here.
      1. Reserve officer
        Reserve officer 5 October 2016 13: 56
        +31
        Second Iraq or Vietnam getting ready? Very similar. The only bad thing is that the Arabs, like warriors, are far from reaching the Vietnamese.
        1. Hunt
          Hunt 5 October 2016 14: 12
          +6
          In this case, Assad will definitely have nothing to lose! The Syrian Navy is armed with 12 batteries with termite anti-ship missiles, 12 Redut missile launchers, 2 anti-ship missile divisions Bastion. I think both We and the Iranians with weapons will help! Plus, the Husites, who transferred the fighting to the rear of the Sunnis, will not win, and they will definitely stop the oil trade. And this victory is strategic! Do you think staff members will take such a risk? And I deliberately do not consider the possibility of air defense, since in this case it will be necessary to attack and not defend! Unfortunately, I don’t know. The naval composition of the Syrian Navy, but I think there are missile boats there too! The war of all against all, there is definitely not needed !!!!!
          1. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 5 October 2016 14: 19
            +8
            Quote: Hunter
            Do you think staff members will take such a risk?

            The technique has been worked out: the coalition forces will again slip in, they will raise a howl, and then a provocation with "chemical weapons" and a Security Council decision, which we will block! - We support the "aggressor" who used XO ... Atu them !!!
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 5 October 2016 17: 04
              +9
              In this "proven method" there is an option - to drive a couple of Ohio with 500 Tomahawks on each for 154 km and start smashing. Nothing from Assad's weapons will dance here. The question is how ours will fight back. Anyway - no one will be fun. hi
            2. Inok10
              Inok10 5 October 2016 21: 09
              +4
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              The methodology has been worked out: coalition forces will be slipped back, a howl

              ... not everything is so simple ... now the coalition is very wary of mattress initiatives ... about the S-300 in Syria, while mattress mats were just squealing, the coalition is keeping quiet ... you see the hint is understood ... yesterday I reviewed twice how Konashenkov squeezed out from itself the word "battery" ...
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              and then a provocation with "chemical weapons" and the decision of the Security Council, which we will block! - We support the "aggressor" who used XO ... Atu them !!!

              ... this number will not be rented ... Assad has no chemical weapons ... exported and destroyed under UN control ...
              Quote: Alex777
              In this "proven method" there is an option - to drive a couple of Ohio with 500 Tomahawks on each for 154 km and start smashing.

              ... they won’t ... the game should be worth the candle ... in any case, not until November 8 ... sharp movements only after the elections ... the stakes are too high ...
              Quote: Alex777
              Nothing of Assad’s armament will spit here. The question is how ours will fight back.
              ... just yesterday the S-300V battery "surfaced" ... electronic warfare / electronic warfare equipment has been there for a long time ... who will tell us ... about the presence of forces and means ... wink
              Quote: Alex777
              In any case - no one will have fun.

              ... this is a fact ... here is situevina with a squiggle ... hi
          2. Rom14
            Rom14 5 October 2016 14: 45
            +15
            The Americans, taking into account the diplomatic orientation of Russia, will certainly continue to "make mistakes" about the Syrian troops ... Except for rattling off weapons and blah blah, ours did not respond to any serious enemies. They brought in the S-300 and immediately began to make excuses and explain to the whole world ... when our headquarters officers would stop shitting. Until you give Sam thoroughly in the teeth, you are still to blame.
            1. Diana Ilyina
              Diana Ilyina 5 October 2016 14: 59
              +27
              Rom14 Today, 14:45
              They dragged the S-300 and immediately began to make excuses and explain to the whole world ..

              What to explain ?! What kind of world ?!
              when will our staff stop vigil

              Likely when you will be appointed the chief of the general staff ... Then, for sure, the khan of mattress!
              Until you thoroughly give Sam the teeth

              Why should there be little things, wail the Pentagon with a nuclear bomb, the whole world is in dust, so to speak ...
          3. Pirogov
            Pirogov 5 October 2016 17: 38
            +3
            Quote: Hunter

            2
            Huntsman Today, 14:12 ↑ New
            In this case, Assad will definitely have nothing to lose! The Syrian Navy is armed with 12 batteries with termite anti-ship missiles, 12 Redut missile launchers, 2 anti-ship missile divisions Bastion. I think both We and the Iranians with weapons will help! Plus, the Husites, who transferred the fighting to the rear of the Sunnis, will not win, and they will definitely stop the oil trade. And this victory is strategic! Do you think staff members will take such a risk? And I deliberately do not consider the possibility of air defense, since in this case it will be necessary to attack and not defend! Unfortunately, I don’t know. The naval composition of the Syrian Navy, but I think there are missile boats there too! The war of all against all, there is definitely not needed !!!!!

            I think you are wrong, just America needs a war of all against everyone! This is my opinion, you understand that with all the victories of Russia, America still has the initiative, Assad’s victory is a shame on America, so they will calmly go for any scenario other than hope for a nuclear one.
            1. Temples
              Temples 5 October 2016 17: 53
              +2
              they will calmly go to any scenario except hope nuclear.

              They will calmly go on ....

              Hold your horses.

              Assad's victory shame America


              Yeah, all drowned overnight from shame. wassat

              We found a pancake bunch of conscientious people.
              What a shame?

              What are you speaking about?
          4. istealth
            istealth 6 October 2016 09: 09
            +1
            The Iraqi army, like the Libyan, also had a lot of things, but the result is one. But we won’t be able to cope there, so if the mess starts, we won’t help
        2. Ribwort
          Ribwort 5 October 2016 14: 20
          +27
          If only for a second Afghanistan. In fact, the situation is very difficult. In fact, the Americans only need a more or less weighty pretext, and then any of the scenarios will generally suit them. The chaos in Syria is wonderful. Getting Russia into this chaos is great. And informational support of the world media, as always, will not be on our side.
          I do not envy our strategists. The situation seems to be bad and even worse.
          1. Mestny
            Mestny 5 October 2016 14: 37
            +4
            Perhaps this can only be stopped with the help of a statement about the immediate use by Russia of nuclear weapons in attacking anyone. In accordance with the doctrine, so to speak.
            Possible.
            1. DefakeR
              DefakeR 5 October 2016 14: 50
              +11
              Greetings to you all in-shniki !!!
              Here I recall the words from the last tales of Grandma Wang:
              ... Syria has not yet fallen ... ... and they will ignite (catch fire) in the east of the Sun (in the sense, several) ...
              ... in 2017 the year will begin and will last 5 years and 20 days .... ... Russia will enter the 3 world at the very end and end with victory .... ... and Vladimir’s name will be famous for centuries. ..

              She used to say everything exactly, so comrades are getting ready ....
            2. Ribwort
              Ribwort 5 October 2016 14: 54
              0
              The result is the same. Democratic howl: an aggressor country, a rogue country ... And, as a consequence, increased sanctions, international isolation, as far as possible, of course, and other "delights". In addition, I do not exclude the possibility that the US will ignore this blackmail, let's call a spade a spade. Or they will escalate the conflict. With their debt, everything can be expected from them.
            3. igor.borov775
              igor.borov775 5 October 2016 15: 30
              +6
              Hi !! you forgot simple. But a very clear order about this given by the PRESIDENT directly efmre. Destroy everything that poses a threat to our military personnel (pilots). It is not canceled. We are waiting calmly that they can make a hegemon. It’s not yet evening.
            4. Dali
              Dali 5 October 2016 16: 10
              +2
              Quote: DefakeR
              Here I recall the words from the last tales of Grandma Wang:
              ... Syria has not yet fallen ... ... and they will ignite (catch fire) in the east of the Sun (in the sense, several) ...

              At the expense of Vanga and her predictions for Syria - it’s still necessary to prove that she predicted this. A more appropriate explanation for the appearance of such a "prediction" that you type leave Syria, because it will fall anyway.

              But we will not give up and will not fall !!!


              By the way, can anyone say when these "predictions" appeared in the media that "Syria has not yet fallen"? All these predictions are more like one of the actions of the information war !!!

              shl
              Damn, gentlemen, admins, why is it not possible to answer, DefakeR throws the same comment - throws it to the top !!!
          2. Monos
            Monos 5 October 2016 15: 04
            +7
            Quote: Ribwort
            I do not envy our strategists. The situation seems to be bad and even worse.

            All this is nonsense. Everyone had long guessed where everything was heading, and some even knew. So there is nothing to lament. "Do what you must, and God will judge!" Everything goes on as usual.
            1. BABA SHURA
              BABA SHURA 5 October 2016 15: 29
              +2
              The main thing is that after the letter P the letter R is not removed. Turn it, in technical terms, we, "We can!", But in economic terms, we will not last long. Given the exchange, rocket for rocket.
          3. marl
            marl 5 October 2016 15: 40
            0
            Quote: Ribwort
            I do not envy our strategists. The situation seems to be bad and even worse.

            And why not assume that if in Syria everything really becomes so hopeless for us, then some kind of signal will be sent to another place, no less painful for the states - the Baltic states, Ukraine ...
        3. Conductor
          Conductor 5 October 2016 14: 29
          0
          I think if the media have already learned about this (although they are very meticulous), then this is a disinfection, a fake in general. Well, what? As if this rarely happens.
        4. Lelek
          Lelek 5 October 2016 15: 11
          +2
          Quote: Reserve officer
          Second Iraq or Vietnam getting ready?


          Only with direct participation of Russia, since there is an agreement between the SAR and Russia.
          At the very first attempt of US aggression, it is necessary to close the skies over Syria and warn our sworn "partners" that in this case, strikes will be struck at their missile launch sites.
      2. dorz
        dorz 5 October 2016 15: 54
        +1
        Quote: SRC P-15
        Want to play with fire? Well, well, just let them not forget that you can get burned here.

        The Americans themselves will not be drawn into a conflict with Russia; rather, they will set up one of the allies, as happened with Turkey. In general, the US leadership is always more interested in the state of the stock market than the death of its own compatriots.
        1. PSih2097
          PSih2097 6 October 2016 11: 49
          0
          Quote: dorz
          The Americans themselves will not be drawn into a conflict with Russia; rather, they will set up one of the allies, as happened with Turkey.

          Svidomitov surely sent to fight on the last Su-27 from Mirgorod or from Lake ... laughing
      3. Rus2012
        Rus2012 5 October 2016 17: 50
        0
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        Want to play

        A bomber, for example, of Denmark (as in the case of Deir ez-Zor), at the command of the Pentagon, can launch an airstrike on Syrian troops in order to assess the likelihood of a “response” from air defense systems, including Russian S-300. If the plane is shot down, a "democratic" howl will rise, under which further military operations from the American "hawks" will advance. If the plane is not shot down, the result will be the same, but only for a “democratic” howl will they find other reasons.

        ... The aircraft of the "paper coalition" will not be shot down. But they can ban ALL FLIGHTS from Inzherlik!
        Your word comrade Erdogan! Was it in vain that they saved?

        And then - the Russians will shoot down!
      4. Bloodsucker
        Bloodsucker 5 October 2016 18: 58
        +1
        At the barmaley, the air conditioner exploded ...
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBqcgy_YsVo

        Well what can I say. Air conditioners, they are dangerous
    2. x.andvlad
      x.andvlad 5 October 2016 13: 44
      +27
      But will there be enough C-300 missiles, as well as political will to repel a massive strike by the Tomahawks?
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 5 October 2016 13: 47
        +2
        Quote: x.andvlad
        But will the S-300 missiles be enough for a massive strike by the Tomahawks?

        Well, there is not only the S-300.
        And besides, our "calibers" can also help in response.
        1. ferro ignique
          ferro ignique 5 October 2016 14: 08
          +17
          If we ate our "calibers" in the "otvetka" then the "otvetka" would also fly to us and this is already the 3rd world
          1. SRC P-15
            SRC P-15 5 October 2016 14: 13
            +12
            Quote: ferro ignique
            If we ate our "calibers" in the "otvetka" then the "otvetka" would also fly to us and this is already the 3rd world

            Do you think that a strike on Syrian airfields is not a strike against us? I personally think there are a lot of our instructors and more. So we will need to hit with "calibers" where the terrorists have the largest number of American instructors.
            1. ride78
              ride78 5 October 2016 17: 50
              +3
              Do you think that 100 calibers or 5000 tomahawks will end faster?
          2. Rus2012
            Rus2012 5 October 2016 17: 57
            +1
            Quote: ferro ignique
            If we ate our "calibers" in the "otvetka" then the "otvetka" would also fly to us and this is already the 3rd world

            ... want to live forever? Especially on your knees?
            This never happens!
            Therefore, we make the RIGHT CHOICE
          3. zoolu300
            zoolu300 5 October 2016 18: 21
            0
            I was already tired of explaining to everyone. THERE WILL NOT BE 3 WORLD WAR, THERE WILL NOT BE (in the classical sense of the war, and so it has been going on for a long time). Fed owners live very well and wish to live very well in the future. For everything to end right away, "Caliber", which will fly to the 6th SShM fleet, must have an SBCH. For fans of "sports" showdowns, the "Korean - Vietnamese" version is suitable.
      2. GELEZNII_KAPUT
        GELEZNII_KAPUT 5 October 2016 13: 51
        +13
        Quote: x.andvlad
        But will there be enough C-300 missiles, as well as political will to repel a massive strike by the Tomahawks?

        No, probably, NATO + Israel planes, + NATO Tomahawks. Dohren, in my opinion, will be ... what
        1. padded jacket
          padded jacket 5 October 2016 14: 02
          +7
          Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
          No, probably, NATO + Israel planes, + NATO Tomahawks. In my opinion, there will be ...

          Most likely you are absolutely right that our S-300s are too small to repulse a massive strike on Syria by countries supporting terrorism like the USA and Israel and Syria’s air defense which before the attack on the country of mercenaries supported by the Washington regimes of Tel Aviv Riyadh was strong enough and had modern complexes An air defense of the Pantsir-C1 Buk-M1 type of Pecher-2M and a developed network of radar posts is now in extremely poor condition and is actually not operational.
          SAR air defense exercises before the attack on it by terrorists supported by the USA by Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other supporters of killer fanatics.
        2. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 5 October 2016 14: 05
          +15
          Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
          No, probably, NATO + Israel planes, +

          Is Israel here sideways? Jews will not participate in this, too much risk of the beginning of all beginnings with an unpredictable end for all. They will stand aside until the last.
          1. padded jacket
            padded jacket 5 October 2016 14: 32
            +6
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Is Israel here sideways? Jews will not participate in this, too much risk of the beginning of all beginnings with an unpredictable end for all.

            Yes, there will be nothing to Israel. He is one of the sponsors of the terrorists, so they do not attack him. lol and Syria itself is now too weakened by the five-year war and will not be able to give a worthy answer to the Tel Aviv regime.
            Although a clear attempt to protect and whitewash the Israeli regime for you, Alexander Romanov, is counted smile
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 5 October 2016 16: 48
              +5
              Quote: quilted jacket
              Although a clear attempt to protect and whitewash the Israeli regime for you, Alexander Romanov, is counted

              Padded jacket, you would be addicted to drugs.
          2. Donhapa
            Donhapa 5 October 2016 14: 40
            +7
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
            No, probably, NATO + Israel planes, +

            Is Israel here sideways? Jews will not participate in this, too much risk of the beginning of all beginnings with an unpredictable end for all. They will stand aside until the last.

            And Izrail, a novel companion, as always, will provoke a war and will jump to the side, behind the backs of his brothers.
            1. padded jacket
              padded jacket 5 October 2016 14: 50
              +5
              Quote: Donhapa
              And Izrail, a novel companion, as always, will provoke a war and will jump to the side, behind the backs of his brothers.

              So there is the Israeli regime, in which case it will again start shedding "tears" and shouting loudly - Around anti-Semites again offend Jews but he will do it from behind the United States, where as many Jews live as in Israel.
          3. murriou
            murriou 5 October 2016 18: 16
            0
            Already participated more than once, so as not to repeat if there is no risk?
          4. Lelek
            Lelek 5 October 2016 19: 19
            +2
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Is Israel here sideways?


            Hi Sanya.
            And ask you this from Avigdor Eskin. Something has not been heard for a long time and his mouth guard does not flicker on the screens (maybe a runny nose or, God forbid, prostatitis). bully
      3. Andrey K
        Andrey K 5 October 2016 13: 52
        +10
        Quote: x.andvlad
        But will there be enough C-300 missiles, as well as political will to repel a massive strike by the Tomahawks?

        Colleague, do not forget with you that there are S-400, Buk-M2E, ZRPK "Pantsir - C1" and so on and so forth ...
        This is about our capabilities.
        The Syrian air defense forces are armed with about 20 Bukovs and about 150 missiles for them ...
        1. Evil543
          Evil543 5 October 2016 14: 16
          +4
          Andrey K Today, 13:52 ↑ New
          Quote: x.andvlad
          But will there be enough C-300 missiles, as well as political will to repel a massive strike by the Tomahawks?
          Colleague, do not forget with you that there are S-400, Buk-M2E, ZRPK "Pantsir - C1" and so on and so forth ...
          This is about our capabilities.
          The Syrian air defense forces are armed with about 20 Bukovs and about 150 missiles for them.

          Now count all the forces of NATO and those that can strike. And our time to reload?
          1. Alexander Abdrakhmanov
            Alexander Abdrakhmanov 5 October 2016 15: 07
            +2
            Where did you get such accurate information - how many missiles from Syria. Moreover, Russia will have a military base there for a long time. It’s not a long move, but since it’s a threat that ours is probably ready for this. We must be complete idiots-to think that Russia will not answer. What do we have - in the Atlantic Ocean there is no submarine fleet and surface. Everyone has different missiles - in America there are no fools either. They want to intimidate-and Russia strengthens Syria for the turnover. They think that we will back down, but this does not happen, that’s the whole hysteria.
        2. 33 Watcher
          33 Watcher 5 October 2016 14: 17
          +7
          Quote: Andrey K
          Quote: x.andvlad
          But will there be enough C-300 missiles, as well as political will to repel a massive strike by the Tomahawks?

          Colleague, do not forget with you that there are S-400, Buk-M2E, ZRPK "Pantsir - C1" and so on and so forth ...
          This is about our capabilities.
          The Syrian air defense forces are armed with about 20 Bukovs and about 150 missiles for them ...

          Why do you all forget about the Mediterranean fleet grouping? Why chase "axes", it is easier to shugan their carriers.
          1. Andrey K
            Andrey K 5 October 2016 14: 25
            +8
            Quote: Observer 33
            Why chase "axes", it is easier to shugan their carriers.

            Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye Yes
      4. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 5 October 2016 13: 59
        0
        Quote: x.andvlad
        But will there be enough C-300 missiles, as well as political will to repel a massive strike by the Tomahawks?

        Not enough. Yes, and no one will consider them. In essence, we are talking about a direct clash between Russia and the United States.
        Olezhka Professor, two servings of fried popcorn and 150 vodka.
        1. Evil543
          Evil543 5 October 2016 14: 17
          +1
          Not enough. Yes, and no one will consider them. In essence, we are talking about a direct clash between Russia and the United States.
          Olezhka Professor, two servings of fried popcorn and 150 vodka.

          Well, at least someone will drink and have a bite.
        2. Lelek
          Lelek 5 October 2016 19: 25
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          two servings of fried popcorn and 150 vodka.


          I'm also for a sober lifestyle

          Take to the company? Then for polishing:
      5. Now we are free
        Now we are free 5 October 2016 14: 05
        +9
        Greetings Andrew hi
        Quote: x.andvlad
        But will the S-300 missiles be enough for a massive strike by the Tomahawks?

        400-k + of the 300-k brought to the BG, delivered to Tartus the other day, is enough against the Tomahawks at the moment, BUT if the USA and their sycophants concentrate an air fist from airfields in Turkey, CA and its other air bases in the region, then it turns out to be air a grouping for 300-400 aircraft (it also includes 3 aircraft carriers "hypothetically" suitable for the DB with their own air groups, which is 60 aircraft for each aircraft carrier). At the moment, they can be opposed by a joint Russian-Syrian air group of up to 50 aircraft (I personally strongly doubt the combat capabilities of the Syrian Air Force in terms of air combat). We can only hope for 400/300, but how many are there now? Division two three? Not enough for such an armada ... However, in order to assemble such a shock "Imperial Fleet" (from the Star Wars) of the USA & Co., it will take time, and during this time the 300 that are now in the warehouse in Tartus will be put on alert, which will somewhat increase our chances + Nobody canceled the possibility that both the Americans' AUG and their aerobases will be hit by the Callibras / Iskander ... Well, if such a booze goes and something else "Thicker", perhaps even with "Fonishaya stuffing" .. ...

        Mdaaaa straight "SOI" all these arguments remind US pilots - McCain should ask the question of what it is like to live for so many years with a fragment of a Soviet anti-aircraft missile in the well ...? His answer, I think many American aces will make them think about whether to go on a business trip to Syria ... laughing laughing laughing
        1. bulvas
          bulvas 5 October 2016 14: 16
          +6
          Quote: Now we are free
          400-k + of the 300-k brought to the BG, delivered to Tartus the other day, is enough against the Tomahawks at the moment, BUT if the USA and their sycophants concentrate an air fist from airfields in Turkey, CA and its other air bases in the region, then it turns out to be air a grouping for 300-400 aircraft (it also includes "hypothetically" 3 aircraft carriers with their own air groups that are suitable for the DB site ...


          They slip European planes, and themselves - Tomahawks.

          I think that only one EU plane shot down will be enough to impose very serious sanctions against Russia and bury the possibility of restoring relations with Europe for a very long time

          As always, you need an asymmetric answer
          Or, as an option, repeat the experience of Korea and Vietnam - install systems and send advisers.

          There will be losses from NATO, maybe they will change their minds.

          We cannot beat ourselves until we are threatened




          1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
            GELEZNII_KAPUT 5 October 2016 14: 42
            0
            Quote: bulvas
            As always, you need an asymmetric answer
            Or, as an option, repeat the experience of Korea and Vietnam - install systems and send advisers.

            I’m afraid it won’t work out there, the wrong people live there! They will simply be carried out and that’s it! hi
        2. Evil543
          Evil543 5 October 2016 14: 19
          +2
          "BUT if the United States and its sycophants concentrate an air fist from airfields in Turkey, SA and its other air bases in the region, then this is already an air grouping for 300-400 aircraft (it also includes" hypothetically "3 aircraft carriers with their own air groups and this is 60 aircraft each aircraft carrier). "

          I would not even doubt it
        3. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 5 October 2016 14: 32
          +2
          Quote: Now we are free
          and something else "Thicker", perhaps even with a "Phonaya filling" ...
          It's like in a joke about an inner voice:
          "THEN THEN EXACTLY --- P..DETS!"
          Quote: vovanpain

          The Black Monkey seems to have decided in the end to arrange the 3-th World War

          It’s just scary somehow ... Again, the prophecy of the Vangelius about the last, 44, BLACK condom at the head of the States ...
          However, in our country we have "all-Russian" exercises on civil defense and emergency situations ... Well, and other events "by order" ...
          Oh, this is not good!
          1. Dali
            Dali 5 October 2016 16: 14
            0
            Quote: BoA KAA
            Straight creepy somehow ... Again, the prophecy of the Gospel

            At the expense of Vanga and her predictions for Syria - it’s still necessary to prove that she predicted this. A more appropriate explanation for the appearance of such a "prediction" that you type leave Syria, because it will fall anyway.

            But we will not give up and will not fall !!!


            By the way, can anyone say when these "predictions" appeared in the media that "Syria has not yet fallen"? All these predictions are more like one of the actions of the information war !!!
          2. Dali
            Dali 5 October 2016 16: 35
            0
            Quote: BoA KAA
            Again, the Gospel prophecy about the last, 44th, BLACK condom led by the United States ...

            The same is true about this prophecy ... like why resist the mattress, it itself will fall apart ...
            This is also one of the phenomena of the info war. And still compete oh as you have !!!

            Therefore, we do not lose vigilance, but we do not ...
          3. mr.redpartizan
            mr.redpartizan 5 October 2016 21: 14
            0
            They will climb to Russia as in the 41st — they will receive fiery greetings from our rocket men. There will be no more Stalingrad - 299 gifts of the Strategic Missile Forces will pierce the clouds and will fall on the combat course.
        4. Andrey K
          Andrey K 5 October 2016 14: 33
          +6
          I greet you Iskander hi
          I agree with your arguments, there is of course a small remark feel
          You describe that the United States and others like them can collectively collapse further on ...
          This is precisely what causes great doubt. Coordination of the participating countries and the amount of equipment and people allocated by them will take a lot of time. Not the fact that there will be a queue of those wishing to go to the forefathers laughing laughing laughing
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 5 October 2016 17: 23
            0
            Believe that they all have not agreed on for a long time? Strange ...
            Already only the lazy did not write how ours (in revenge for our scouts who died during the "accidental" bombing of the Syrians), with Caliber smashed the headquarters in Aleppo where there were Israelis, Turks, Saudis, Qataris, and Anglo-Saxons from both banks.
            So this alliance has long been formed. The question is what to decide. And the fact that Trump spoke differently that Russia needs to be stopped is a sign that everything is not going for the better.
            Personally, I do not want any war in Syria, with our participation. hi
            1. _Slavs
              _Slavs 7 October 2016 14: 22
              0
              They have already agreed - just as yesterday, the Frenchman (henchman) began to spit saliva in our direction, earlier they were more modest. The bowl with adrenaline is visible on Monday the French ate from the owner, now they are bursting with fighting spirit.
      6. lis-ik
        lis-ik 5 October 2016 14: 31
        +3
        Most likely, both will not be enough. Populism is unlikely to take a ride here, but wait and see, maybe our people will be able to respond, only here there is clearly not enough strength.
      7. De laert
        De laert 5 October 2016 16: 01
        +1
        Maybe the idea is just that Russia should maximize its missile reserves in Syria, so that later it’s not enough to protect its borders (as an option)
        1. mr.redpartizan
          mr.redpartizan 5 October 2016 21: 22
          0
          For protection, Russia has three hundred land-based ICBMs and about two hundred naval, as well as the CD of strategic aviation. For the European Union, landing on their heads a couple of dozen RS-18 Stilett missiles, carrying a couple of hundred BBs of 550 kt each, is quite enough. A US land attack is ruled out for purely geographical reasons.
      8. Rus2012
        Rus2012 5 October 2016 17: 54
        0
        Quote: x.andvlad
        But will there be enough C-300 missiles, as well as political will to repel a massive strike by the Tomahawks?

        ... and inna? In response, ICBMs will "go away" - "Hello and goodbye, America!"
    3. Svoy_tovarish
      Svoy_tovarish 5 October 2016 13: 56
      +11
      Are you really funny? What will be opposed by one s300 and s400 system of the fort Grkr "Moskva" in a compartment with several units Tor and Pantsir that are in Syria? So what will they be able to do with, for example, several hundred cruise missiles, with a simultaneous strike by aviation and with the use of missiles, without entering the air defense zone? In a local conflict, the US-NATO can assemble a grouping that no one can oppose to anything. It's another matter when it comes to our country, a huge continental state with a fairly dense coverage area of ​​radar and air defense, and with nuclear weapons. But what does Syria have to do with it? ?
      1. Stena
        Stena 5 October 2016 14: 17
        +5
        Quote: Svoy_tovarish
        Are you really funny? What will be opposed by one s300 and s400 system of the fort Grkr "Moskva" in a compartment with several units Tor and Pantsir that are in Syria? So what will they be able to do with, for example, several hundred cruise missiles, with a simultaneous strike by aviation and with the use of missiles, without entering the air defense zone? In a local conflict, the US-NATO can assemble a grouping that no one can oppose to anything. It's another matter when it comes to our country, a huge continental state with a fairly dense coverage area of ​​radar and air defense, and with nuclear weapons. But what does Syria have to do with it?

        Where did several hundred missiles come from? Americans - what are powerful or what? And what about the creation of groupings of troops and the work of intelligence - completely canceled? Don't write nonsense. They can't do anything. But tryndezha - oh, how much. Massive concentration and preparation for the strike of hundreds of cruise missiles, aircraft, etc. you can't miss it. But you can continue in the same spirit - from the heading - "But if my grandmother had ... she would have been - a grandfather" ...
        1. Svoy_tovarish
          Svoy_tovarish 5 October 2016 15: 01
          +2
          This you continue from the category of "if only grandma" .. For the US-NATO to assemble a grouping near Syria to strike with several hundred missiles is not such an impossible task. When you write nonsense, it refers to your words. This has already happened, and Iraq and Libya were destroyed just like that. For a minute, the United States has the largest fleet, a huge number of bases in this region, and NATO countries, which, if sent on a ship, will not strain too much, but will gather enough armada. And let's say concentration is noticed, and then what? Offer to strike at this concentration? Who will apply it? Syria? Develop your thought ..
          I do not say to give up or back down from our line, we have the President, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, and it is up to him to decide what to do in this very difficult situation. But such victorious comments look ridiculous, childish ..
          1. nov_tech.vrn
            nov_tech.vrn 5 October 2016 16: 33
            0
            It's boring to read, is it really difficult to raise materials on the losses of US aviation and their henchmen in recent wars, do not read Reuters and the BBC, save your nerves, in all the last wars since 1990, which were unleashed by the US, the US Air Force and its allies had impressive losses, note an overwhelming advantage, both quantitative and qualitative, there the opponents did not have modern air defense systems and there were no means of guidance, the American military they know the real numbers of losses in past wars and predicted in the event of a conflict, this is what keeps the "partners" from trying to enforce threats By the way, quite recently an article was discussed on this matter. So, according to the data provided by the Ministry of Defense of Yugoslavia, during the bombing, the North Atlantic bloc lost 128 aircraft (including three F-117s, one B-2 Spirit strategic bomber, one B-52 Stratofortress strategic bomber, one E- AWACS aircraft 3A "Sentry"), 14 helicopters, 60 drones and 454 cruise missiles.
          2. Dikson
            Dikson 5 October 2016 17: 20
            +1
            Actually, right after the "mistake" of the Americans in Syria and the allegedly bombed out humanitarian convoy by us, and conversations about the advisers and assistants of ISIS destroyed by our missiles, one of our senior officers commenting on TV said that thanks to this proactive strike, a massive American attack was prevented. "Axes" in Syria .. And even the number of missiles was mentioned: from 125 to 250 .. I just heard such a thing, but I don’t remember exactly who from our leadership said so ..
      2. Mestny
        Mestny 5 October 2016 14: 42
        +5
        Katz offers to surrender?
        Is it really not clear - there comes a turning point. They will not stop in achieving the goal - the destruction of Russia. If ours are now retreating - that’s it, then we will end. But if they don’t back down, then there is a chance.
      3. mr.redpartizan
        mr.redpartizan 5 October 2016 21: 32
        0
        In response to an attack by Russian troops, the 949A submarine can discharge the "granites" ammunition at US and EU ships. Several thousand dead carriers of democracy, which have become fish food, will blow up farts in dozens of countries on all continents. They will climb on us after that - not granites will fly, but poplars and yars.
      4. _Slavs
        _Slavs 7 October 2016 14: 28
        0
        Syria has about 40 Panzeri, previously set up, I think that in two years our people have been submarine and worked with the personnel ...
    4. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 5 October 2016 13: 57
      +1
      Quote: Andrey K
      And what will Comrade S-300 say to this?

      Cool smailik, so funny. It’s interesting, when the dummy begins and we and Amers begin to shoot down each other’s planes, will you put the same smilik?
      1. noWAR
        noWAR 5 October 2016 14: 07
        +2
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        It’s interesting, when the dummy begins and we and Amers begin to shoot down each other’s planes, will you put the same smilik?


        don’t worry, Alex, we’ll find different smiles.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 5 October 2016 14: 12
          0
          Quote: noWAR
          don’t worry, Alex, we’ll find different smiles.

          There will be no time to search anywhere
      2. Andrey K
        Andrey K 5 October 2016 14: 16
        +8
        Quote: Alexander Romanov

        Cool smailik, so funny. It’s interesting, when the dummy begins and we and Amers begin to shoot down each other’s planes, will you put the same smilik?

        When it starts, I don’t know for sure, I can guarantee you that I will put my emoticons on the battlefield wink
        Experience is available, according to age for mobilization I still correspond laughing
      3. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher 5 October 2016 14: 21
        +4
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: Andrey K
        And what will Comrade S-300 say to this?

        Cool smailik, so funny. It’s interesting, when the dummy begins and we and Amers begin to shoot down each other’s planes, will you put the same smilik?

        Are you all in a fit of defeatist panic arriving? Almost a year, aren't you tired? Save your nerves.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 5 October 2016 14: 23
          +4
          Quote: Observer 33
          Are you all in a fit of defeatist panic arriving?

          An attack of inevitability. And as for defeatism, when the operation in Syria began, who wrote that we will be ISIS for a month to break up. Yes, we will tear everyone, and Obama Khan in Syria.
          Quote: Observer 33
          Save your nerves.

          I’m calm because I can’t change anything.
          1. ohtandur
            ohtandur 5 October 2016 16: 01
            +1
            An attack of inevitability. And as for defeatism, when the operation in Syria began, who wrote that we will be ISIS for a month to break up. Yes, we will tear everyone, and Obama Khan in Syria.

            Yes I remember. Everyone then dreamed of a blitzkrieg. I remember your skeptical comments. Then I also wanted to believe in success, but with my mind I agreed with you
      4. Rus2012
        Rus2012 5 October 2016 18: 01
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        and amers and I will begin to shoot down each other’s planes,

        ... Comrade Ramanov, but my friends and I will go to the "partisans", and YOU?
    5. vovanpain
      vovanpain 5 October 2016 14: 01
      +9
      And this is an open invasion of Syria with the simultaneous declaration of war by the Syrian government forces. In fact, this is the main confirmation that the United States is the main sponsor of international terrorism.

      The Black Monkey seems to have decided to finally unleash the 3rd World War, oh it seems that the S-300 is not in vain there, oh not in vain. request
      1. Kibalchish
        Kibalchish 5 October 2016 14: 52
        +2
        It was not for nothing that Wang predicted that the black president of the United States would be the last president ...
    6. Sfurei
      Sfurei 5 October 2016 14: 44
      +7
      Most likely, the United States will not deliver a massive blow to the Tomahawks:
      1. a strike from the sea is through our Syrian grouping of ships, which means that when flying in our direction, we have the right to respond with whatever we can.
      2. Persian Gulf - Iran will also not be delighted with attacks on Syria, and aircraft carriers can be locked in the gulf.
      3. The Greek seas (at the limit of range) - flying through Turkey - there will be time to realize the threat and prepare + Turkey will substitute. + How then will they dump from these seas?
      4. Most likely the Red Sea through Jordan (the shortest way), but here Egypt may also be outraged.
      Most likely there will be a test of strikes by small air groups at airfields.

      Most likely, in the coming days, we will officially transfer the S-300 to Syria, so that we would not be thought of. And then, at the very first provocation, we will try to shoot down as many airplanes (and preferably drones) as they fly. If out of 10 aircraft 5-6 are shot down or fired, then no one else will decide to climb into Syria without preparation. After that, Syria will have to declare a no-fly zone over the country.
      This is the only option.
    7. ilya_oz
      ilya_oz 5 October 2016 19: 35
      +1
      Something I doubt that the two S-300/400 divisions will be able to repel a massive strike by cruise missiles at Syrian airfields.
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 5 October 2016 20: 00
        0
        About the S-300B4, the air defense general said that he would put 40 Axes.
        The rest will fly on.
    8. SMikhalych
      SMikhalych 5 October 2016 22: 36
      0
      Comrade S-300 will amazingly affect the vision of American pilots, not allowing them to miss the hospitals laughing
    9. 73bor
      73bor 6 October 2016 11: 15
      0
      As I remember right now, five years ago, the United States planned a strike on Syria, ours were not there, -but, I do not want to! And now they’re emboldened? Oh well!
  2. Hunt
    Hunt 5 October 2016 13: 41
    +3
    Yes Yes! What else is the Pentagon ready for? The Syrian Bastion in the stern! Application from the category - LATE!
  3. kebeskin
    kebeskin 5 October 2016 13: 42
    +7
    And here is the question for our military. It will not be scary in case of something to stumble on the Americans. Or there will be regular notes of protests from the Foreign Ministry
    1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 5 October 2016 13: 48
      +15
      This is a question for the President, and the military ... they bang!
    2. DmitryK
      DmitryK 5 October 2016 13: 54
      +4
      There will be regular notes of protest .....
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 5 October 2016 13: 59
        +4
        Quote: DmitryK
        There will be regular notes of protest .....

        There will be a warrior about whom you so dreamed.
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 5 October 2016 14: 36
          +4
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          There will be a warrior about whom you so dreamed.
          Only go away can dream of war!
          PS. One dynasty of the Romanovs has already been interrupted ... Surely you, namesake, is not enough ??? stop
          1. Bloodsucker
            Bloodsucker 5 October 2016 14: 42
            +2
            A colleague ... how does a patriot differ from a patriot ury? That is the case.
            Such people will sit back, then emerge from the next analogue of the notorious Tashkent front and a new wave of all infomishura and screams will begin, about their inimitable heroism and foresight.
          2. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 5 October 2016 16: 51
            0
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            PS. One dynasty of the Romanovs has already been interrupted ... Surely you, namesake, is not enough ??

            I like the world, so some are impatient to bang, bend, worthily smear across the United States.
  4. Tusv
    Tusv 5 October 2016 13: 48
    +1
    If the plane is shot down, a "democratic" howl will rise, under which further military operations from the American "hawks" will advance. If the plane is not shot down, the result will be the same, but only for a “democratic” howl will they find other reasons.

    Well, so as not to hurt, you have to fill up
  5. tiredwithall
    tiredwithall 5 October 2016 13: 50
    +2
    Yes, alarming. Too close to the global hot phase.
  6. Professor
    Professor 5 October 2016 13: 50
    +5
    Media: Pentagon ready to attack Tomahawks Syrian military airfields

    In the photo for the article is not Tomahawk, but Harpoon.
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 5 October 2016 13: 59
      +2
      Outstripped! ;), while writing that the ax looks a bit different ...
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 5 October 2016 14: 01
      +3
      Quote: professor
      In the photo for the article is not Tomahawk, but Harpoon.

      Olezhka, maybe his popcorn, kindle the barbecue, we’ll fry the barbecue for the last time. Feel the aroma of the approaching Armageddon?
      1. Evil543
        Evil543 5 October 2016 14: 23
        0
        Olezhka, maybe his popcorn, kindle the barbecue, we’ll fry the barbecue for the last time. Feel the aroma of the approaching Armageddon?

        Familiar from Israel constantly from Russia pork for kebabs exported
        1. padded jacket
          padded jacket 5 October 2016 14: 44
          +1
          Quote: Evil543
          Familiar from Israel constantly from Russia pork for kebabs exported

          Is she not kosher? Poor Jews in Israel, if not jailed, then local Orthodox will be very unhappy. lol
          1. Evil543
            Evil543 5 October 2016 15: 02
            +1
            Professor Today, 14: 55 ↑
            Quote: Evil543
            Familiar from Israel constantly from Russia pork for kebabs exported
            Well and suckers. Why bring what you can buy on the spot? fool

            Here is a professor why insult people? they say the taste is not the same, I like the same mutton that is baked in Cyprus, we don’t cook like that.
            1. Professor
              Professor 5 October 2016 15: 06
              0
              Quote: Evil543
              Here is a professor why insult people? they say the taste is not the same, I like the same mutton that is baked in Cyprus, we don’t cook like that.

              So they don’t know how to cook it. lol So tell them. And give them my sincere apologies. wink
          2. padded jacket
            padded jacket 5 October 2016 15: 46
            +2
            Quote: professor
            Well and suckers. Why bring what you can buy on the spot? fool

            Repatriate soldier sentenced to 11 days in custody for eating pork laughing
            The young repatriate, who arrived from the United States specifically for service in the IDF, was sentenced by the tribunal for 11 days under arrest for eating pork.
            The history of the first was made public by the war correspondent of the Kol Israel radio station, Carmela Menache. According to her, the soldier was convicted of eating pork during exercises. A non-kosher sandwich, as it turned out, was made to a soldier by his grandmother, who lives in a kibbutz.
            http://cursorinfo.co.il/news/novosti1/2015/06/01/
            soldatarepatrianta-otpravili-na - dney-pod-arest-z
            a-poedanie-svinini /
            1. Kasym
              Kasym 5 October 2016 18: 07
              +2
              Professor, good afternoon! The taste of meat depends on what the cattle was fed. How about GMO? Allowed or not, if livestock is fed GMOs, is it unlikely that it will be tasty ?!
              I agree with you that NATO will get by with the supply of weapons and maybe air strikes against the Syrian army, but no more. Russia cannot "lose" there, so it will stand to the end, and the United States will have to "retreat", which of course will affect the authority of the Yankees. But I am afraid that they will not leave Syria alone, even if they squeeze out all the bearded men there - they will find new ones, and there are many interested in this there. I don’t understand one thing, why does the State Department need so many negotiations and this agreement with the Russian Federation, if it was torn apart so quickly and so set itself up with nusra? I understand that they were gaining time; but the result is the worst - it became clear who was behind nusra, etc. worth it. It would be clever to unite with the Russian Federation, crush the "sworn", share the victory (world applause, respect, etc.), push your "opposition" into parliament, even if not for the presidency, and arrange a second series. But where are they in a hurry, substituting themselves? It is clear that the monarchs will be unhappy - but you can calm down with the 2nd series. The policy is kind of "stupid". At first, Sadamm was thrown off - they played into the hands of the Shiites and Iran, who was "strangled". Now they get dirty with the bearded all over the world because of incomprehensible goals (they promised the monarchs most likely) in Syria. You are closer there, maybe explain this situation with your point of view. hi
        2. igor67
          igor67 5 October 2016 17: 08
          0
          Quote: Evil543
          Olezhka, maybe his popcorn, kindle the barbecue, we’ll fry the barbecue for the last time. Feel the aroma of the approaching Armageddon?

          Familiar from Israel constantly from Russia pork for kebabs exported

          Why? There are a lot of shops selling pork, they bring only lard.
    3. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 5 October 2016 14: 01
      +1
      Do you think Professor, will yours join Plan B too?
      1. Professor
        Professor 5 October 2016 14: 12
        +9
        Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
        Do you think Professor, will yours join Plan B too?

        I do not get tired of repeating. This is not our war. We do not climb there and send only an answer. If this was our war, then no-one who had no equivalents in the world of S-400 and the crash of a single S-300 aircraft would not have helped Assad. In addition, the Americans do not need our help. Roll out if you want Assad and without us. They will do this from afar, from support, and exclusively by the forces of vacationers and militias.

        IMHO plan B is not Tomahawks, but only deliveries to the militias of more modern weapons, including air defense. Remember what the old TOU did there?


        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Olezhka, maybe his popcorn, kindle the barbecue, we’ll fry the barbecue for the last time. Feel the aroma of the approaching Armageddon?

        There will be no armageddon. Lavrov’s daughter seems to be !!! returned from the United States to Russia, but the daughters of GDP work for the good of the motherland in Europe. Popcorn is enough. Moreover, the bomb shelter with us now looks like an ordinary room in an apartment with metal shutters and an armored door.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 5 October 2016 14: 20
          +1
          Quote: professor
          but the daughters of GDP work for the good of the motherland in Europe.

          Do you really believe that?
          Quote: professor
          Moreover, the bomb shelter with us now looks like an ordinary room in an apartment with metal shutters and an armored door.

          Well, such a refuge will save unless from a makeshift Palestinian crap.
          Quote: professor

          There will be no armageddon

          The warrior is a utopia of fools, but fools are in power. Kebab and no popcorn!
          1. Professor
            Professor 5 October 2016 14: 42
            +2
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Do you really believe that?

            Of course not. They lie about the daughters of GDP. In fact, they are modest girls and work as milkmaids on the Ilyich Way collective farm. About grandmother Kabaeva also lie. Well they are liars. What to take from them? request

            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Well, such a refuge will save unless from a makeshift Palestinian crap.

            Half a meter of reinforced concrete with a metal layer is saved not only from the Fylystyn homemade products. EMNIP then no one died in such a room even with a direct hit in the house of Fajar with a caliber of 333 mm with a warhead with 90 kg of explosives.

            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            The warrior is a utopia of fools, but fools are in power. Kebab and no popcorn!

            Nuclear war is utopia, and popcorn is enough for the rest of the war, all the more so since fasting days are urgently needed after the meat eaten during the holidays.
        2. padded jacket
          padded jacket 5 October 2016 14: 41
          +4
          Quote: professor
          I do not get tired of repeating. This is not our war. We do not climb there and send only an answer. If this was our war, then no-one who had no equivalents in the world of S-400 and the crash of a single S-300 aircraft would not have helped asad

          Yeah, if you do not remember, of course, how recently these great and invincible Israeli Jews tried to shoot down a drone by spending two Petriot surface-to-air missiles on it and one air-to-air missile from an aircraft, but without shooting it down lol
          The courageous clumsy ones from the IDF better remember how they fled in fear, sparkling their heels from Lebanon in 2006 smile .
          1. Professor
            Professor 5 October 2016 14: 58
            +2
            Quote: quilted jacket
            The courageous clumsy ones from the IDF better remember how they fled in fear, sparkling their heels from Lebanon in 2006

            padded jacket, Murnia’s brains have already been found, or will it remain so brainless? wink
            1. padded jacket
              padded jacket 5 October 2016 15: 12
              +1
              Quote: professor
              padded jacket, Murnia’s brains have already been found, or will it remain so brainless? wink

              Yeah, his brains are in the same place as the brains of Omri Chaim Elmakayes-Yakubovich smile
        3. Sheikh
          Sheikh 5 October 2016 14: 43
          +2
          good day, so the Russian Federation is also apparently not going to fight, the forces put forward will not be enough to withstand the real attack of a major power, just cover the port and the airbase a little, so it seems like it is not necessary to dream of a world war.
          and how to respond to provocations and dirty tricks is probably an opportunity.
          surprisingly, the Israeli state has become peace-loving, and special services are almost doves of peace, nice.
  7. Evil 55
    Evil 55 5 October 2016 13: 50
    +2
    It is advisable for Assad to move all of its air forces under the Russian air defense umbrella .. Well, and declare a no-fly zone ..
  8. asbond
    asbond 5 October 2016 13: 50
    +3
    Iraqi scenario? But there was no Russia in Iraq, times have changed. It seems to me that this is information noise to test Russia's reaction. Openly without "mistakes" - they will not dare, at least until the elections are held: there are too many unpredictable factors for the United States in such a development of events.
  9. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 5 October 2016 13: 50
    +3
    It seems that the air defense of the Syrians should be significantly strengthened. One S-300 battery is clearly not enough.
  10. Dr. Barmaley
    Dr. Barmaley 5 October 2016 13: 51
    +4
    Pentagon ready to attack Syrian military airfields with Tomahawks

  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. GAndr
    GAndr 5 October 2016 13: 55
    0
    Yeah, if they trample one S-300 battery, it really will not be enough ...
    I don’t think donkeys are sitting in our General Staff and are counting all the possible events. I think the answer is in store, especially after such an ultimatum that he organized the GDP.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 5 October 2016 16: 27
      0
      In the near future, it is worth waiting for the delivery of several more air defense batteries to Syria.
  13. red joni
    red joni 5 October 2016 13: 56
    +2
    let them try, we will kill them all and spit on everything including this planet that has long outlived its own.
  14. Not served
    Not served 5 October 2016 13: 56
    +2
    The question is where they want to attack. If from the sea, they will go through our grouping of ships, From the territory of Turkey if only. But the Turks will not be very happy about this, the Amers have strained relations with them.
    Tomahawks seem to be like not ballistic missiles, but low-flying ones, their Shell can interestingly bring down?
    And the most interesting is whether strikes will be made on the sources of launches?
    1. Oleneboy_
      Oleneboy_ 5 October 2016 14: 04
      0
      I’m terribly interested too. Where they will attack from. I examined different options. I don’t see the attack points on the world map. So we are waiting for further fuss
      1. Bloodsucker
        Bloodsucker 5 October 2016 14: 46
        +1
        Yes?
        Well, at least from the Persian Gulf, and even from the Indian Ocean, the range will allow. From bases in Qatar, Saudi Arabia, there is rubbish from Amer’s rampart.
        Walk on Google, where the USA AUG is rummaging there now ..
    2. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 5 October 2016 14: 05
      +2
      Quote: Didn't serve
      The question is where they want to attack. If from the sea, they will go through our grouping of ships, From the territory of Turkey if only. But the Turks will not be very happy about this, the Amers have strained relations with them.
      Tomahawks seem to be like not ballistic missiles, but low-flying ones, their Shell can interestingly bring down?
      And the most interesting is whether strikes will be made on the sources of launches?

      According to sources, it would not hurt, but then exactly the 3rd world is guaranteed with the participation of ICBMs.
    3. kapitan281271
      kapitan281271 5 October 2016 14: 06
      0
      According to the carriers of the marine component, it is unlikely that this will already be a star though .............
      1. mr.redpartizan
        mr.redpartizan 5 October 2016 21: 43
        0
        If 3,14ndos will strike at the Russian Khmeimim airbase, then Russia may well drown a couple of American aircraft carriers.
    4. Ajent cho
      Ajent cho 5 October 2016 14: 21
      +2
      Quote: Didn't serve
      Tomahawks seem to be like not ballistic missiles, but low-flying ones, their Shell can interestingly bring down?

      Tomahawk is the most welcome client for the Shell.
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 5 October 2016 14: 44
        0
        Carapace in Hmimima + Syrian carapace of Damascus and Homs.

        The mass of bases is not covered. Yes, take the same DeZ. There is nothing there (the air defense base is under the black ones, while the black ones are firing at the AB itself from the heights, making it impossible to push the silos with landing, only parachute dropping and helicopters).
    5. donavi49
      donavi49 5 October 2016 14: 41
      +2
      Persian Gulf. Then look at the distances to all key bases, at least in Googlemaps / at least in Yakarta, at least on the globe.

      Then see what rockets fly over? In Iraq, 80% of the way over the deserted desert. In Syria, most (500km) over a deserted desert.

      With the SPM, as an option, the AWACS will shine, put obstacles + which Scalps the Europeans, if they climb too, will launch over Cyprus, at most Elk with VPU will shoot at objects on the coast.

      As for Turkey - if the otvetka arrives on Turkobabah in the North of Aleppo, then this is only a plus. That is, the trump card of pressure on Erdogan from the United States.
    6. st25310
      st25310 5 October 2016 15: 53
      0

      Tomahawk Hunter.
  15. ydjin
    ydjin 5 October 2016 13: 59
    +1
    And I’ll ask, on what basis do the United States even have the right to bypass the UN Security Council to take such decisions ?!
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 5 October 2016 14: 36
      +2
      On the basis of the law of the strong. In the same Iraq and without a UN decision entered. So what? Did someone stop them? Moreover, after the invasion, Bush was reelected for a second term wink .
  16. Moor
    Moor 5 October 2016 14: 00
    +3
    The Washington Post newspaper published material about a meeting at the White House, to which leaders of US security agencies and intelligence services were invited.
    I do not see a single mention of the press in the list of invitees, and there seems to be no official briefing. So where does such detailed information come from? Newspapers routinely "kindle". What a blessing that the armies are still run by the military, and not by journalists who, for the sake of a biting headline in an article, are ready to slaughter their own grandmother. am
  17. dsm100
    dsm100 5 October 2016 14: 00
    +1
    It seems we are all on the verge of a grandiose rascal ....
    1. Evil543
      Evil543 5 October 2016 14: 24
      +2
      Did you just notice?
  18. Prince of Pensions
    Prince of Pensions 5 October 2016 14: 01
    0
    If they have this thought, then what do we have in order to bring down these tama bows?
  19. sabakina
    sabakina 5 October 2016 14: 01
    +6
    Mdya, the task ...
    "Shoot down cannot be missed."
    Where to put a comma? recourse
    1. mr.redpartizan
      mr.redpartizan 5 October 2016 21: 50
      0
      There is no problem - in the event of an attack by the SAR, the Syrians begin to shoot down the bearers of democracy with our anti-aircraft guns, and if a tanned monkey orders to attack the Russian armed forces in Syria, we drown the AUG in the Mediterranean Sea and destroy the US air bases on the Arabian Peninsula.
      1. Hunt
        Hunt 5 October 2016 22: 05
        0
        I’m embarrassed to ask, what are you going to stoke the AUG and destroy the US air bases, and what about Igerlik, is he also the US air base ???
        1. mr.redpartizan
          mr.redpartizan 5 October 2016 22: 43
          0
          AUG are destroyed with the help of the Granit anti-ship missile system and the Kh-32 anti-aircraft missile system, and the airbases around Syria - with the help of the Kyrgyz strategic aviation and MAPL. Even a single granite or X-32 hit on the deck of an aircraft carrier is guaranteed to disable it.
          1. Hunt
            Hunt 5 October 2016 23: 24
            +6
            Yeah, in my opinion you have a poor idea of ​​what the carrier group is that you are going to destroy with the help of MAPL, I suppose Antey are the carriers of granite? I hasten to inform you that in the Mediterranean region, there is not one of the five boats in service, so excuse me granites disappear. Even during the heyday of my native Black Sea Fleet, the destruction of the carrier group was a very difficult task, not to mention the two carrier groups. Under certain conditions, having squandered the entire Black Sea Fleet and half of long-range aviation, we assume this problem can be solved. Now on. How do you expect to break through the defense of the bases that you think are located on the Arabian Peninsula ??? Having slammed the remaining long-range aviation plus probably also strategic? Can you imagine the combined potential of NATO and the monarchies of the Gulf, in whose territories are the bases ??? What about Turkey? Which I write is just too lazy. Therefore, your idea is from the realm of fiction. The only option is the use of nuclear weapons, but I hope you are an adequate person and do not seriously offer this!
  20. Taygerus
    Taygerus 5 October 2016 14: 05
    +1
    even Fashington completely lost his temper, even so I want to believe that these exceptional ghouls will not go to the 3rd World War
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 5 October 2016 14: 12
    +2
    They are creatures such- they poke their head in Syria recourse then the moment of truth will come for our elite - how to react to this
    1. Bashibuzuk
      Bashibuzuk 5 October 2016 14: 51
      +7
      My opinion is that ours will swallow it all. They will rub off.
      Libya was silent at one time. And how they rolled everything into the trash of these rackets.
      So here.
      Americans are fucking from where - a thread from the Red Sailor, but with these Tomahawks - and what will our systems do?
      Never mind.
      They won’t shoot down coalition planes, since they will not attack us. And accidentally flown ... well, well, such a fate. For us.
      And for the adversaries, everything that happens will turn out. They say. They will lie.
      ...
      All these measures of ours ... S-400, what else is there ... a very weak game of anticipation, of psychological pressure. This plutonium .... scare everything, scare.
      And to frighten psychos is useless. They are only afraid of beatings. I know, from a madhouse, I had to communicate.
      ...
      We have no way out. For any we will be made extreme.
  23. sania275
    sania275 5 October 2016 14: 13
    +4
    If time "H" suddenly comes, you will have to not only intercept cruise missiles, but also hit the launch points of these missiles, wherever they are. Desirable ..
  24. tinibar
    tinibar 5 October 2016 14: 17
    +1
    Quote: SRC P-15
    Media: Pentagon ready to attack Tomahawks Syrian military airfields

    Want to play with fire? Well, well, just let them not forget that you can get burned here.

    Yes, here you can burn ...
  25. The comment was deleted.
    1. Bloodsucker
      Bloodsucker 5 October 2016 14: 49
      +2
      https://ria.ru/spravka/20150930/1293215601.html
      Read.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Bloodsucker
          Bloodsucker 5 October 2016 18: 29
          0
          My dear man, you again, ATTENTIVELY read, below for those who see only the word USSR, the registry-contract is also valid for the Russian Federation.
          1. The comment was deleted.
    2. ydjin
      ydjin 5 October 2016 14: 52
      +1
      Quote from rudolf
      Officially, we are in Syria at the request of the Syrian government to assist in the fight against terrorism. But we do not have a military-political alliance with Syria and, accordingly, we are not obligated to protect Syria in the event of a conflict with any state. We dare not shoot down American planes. Otherwise, the base in Hmeimim will last a few hours or days, as well as the Mediterranean ship group. Let's be realistic.

      Russia provides assistance to the legitimate Syrian government. As for the American planes, will the Americans risk losing at least one? As for the aircraft carriers, the Zulus can be bombed with high quality! But, will our "partners" dare to verify that they are unpunished against Russia? This question! This is not the Somali pirates chasing the sea. This is shooting yourself in the temple with a pistol in the hope of a misfire. We just have nowhere to retreat!
      1. corporal
        corporal 5 October 2016 15: 19
        +1
        Quote: ydjin
        We just have nowhere to retreat!

        Well, how so nowhere? Back to the Homeland, and watch from the side how Syria is brought out. Flimsy we are still with NATO butting for someone.
        Against scrap, there is no reception .... and we have no other scrap yet (so, installation, but this is for self-defense).
    3. jovanni
      jovanni 5 October 2016 18: 23
      +2
      "... We will not dare to shoot down American planes. Otherwise, the base in Khmeimim will exist for a few hours or days, as well as the Mediterranean naval group. Let's be realistic."

      Unfortunately, if we do not dare to shoot down, our Homeland will not last long. This will be a signal that we can be torn. Let's be realistic.
  26. Halfunra
    Halfunra 5 October 2016 14: 22
    +2
    So it is.
    Test new technology with old weapons.
    After Vietnam, the Yankees did not directly intersect with the VKS anywhere, and now for them and us it is a unique moment to play our own war, in a foreign field. hi
  27. 76SSSR
    76SSSR 5 October 2016 14: 25
    +1
    Does anyone really take this bluff seriously? While the videoconferencing is there, there will be no blow.
    1. corporal
      corporal 5 October 2016 15: 22
      +2
      Quote: 76SSSR
      While the videoconferencing is there

      The Turks checked, you can beat us with impunity (well, throw a hundred or two tons of tomatoes into the trash, which is not fatal)
  28. Moor
    Moor 5 October 2016 14: 33
    0
    It turns out the meeting was already last Thursday. [media = https: //www.washingtonpost.com/news/josh-r
    ogin / wp / 2016 / 10 / 04 / obama-administration-consideri
    ng-strikes-on-assad-again /? hpid = hp_no-name_opinio
    n-card-e: homepage / story]. Relax colleagues, nothing has changed in a week stop But I recommend reading the comments of foreign opponents, very interesting
  29. Ivan Ivanov
    Ivan Ivanov 5 October 2016 14: 39
    0
    Here's how wonderful. Our partners were still surprised at the bushes - and against whom it’s our c300
  30. free
    free 5 October 2016 14: 45
    0
    in any situation, we have no turning back!
    1. DmitryK
      DmitryK 10 October 2016 16: 17
      0
      Way home
  31. doework
    doework 5 October 2016 14: 46
    0
    It would be time for the Guarantor and the Foreign Ministry to unequivocally explain to the "enlightened West" what he is doing ...
    1. ydjin
      ydjin 5 October 2016 15: 09
      0
      There would be no live, trade and cooperate. I see that our opponents have lost shame. Just trying to suck blood like leeches. Blow under the table like Samantha Power. It is a pity the video and photo were removed from the open spaces of the tube! She was just a star! And Churkin is just Krasava!
  32. cap
    cap 5 October 2016 14: 58
    0
    “The Russian bear never dies, it only hibernates. Russian provocations must be met by the force of the United States. If Russia wants to continue its barbaric attacks on civilians in Aleppo, the US must be prepared to use military forces to strike the military objectives of the Assad regime, "- said the Republican candidate for US vice-president ...."
    Source: http://politpuzzle.ru/43445-pens-russkij-medved-n
    ikogda-ne-umiraet-on-lish-vpadaet-v-spyachku /

    It seems like playing with a computer, where you can press "DEL" and start over.
    It seems to me personally that in order to bring grandmother to power, American warriors will throw yet another provocation closer to the elections.
    And so there sideways all this comes out no one thinks.
    That something like this.
    1. ydjin
      ydjin 5 October 2016 15: 24
      0
      If the exceptional have no sense of self-sacrifice, then they are the dead end of humanity! But we must not be handed back. Only a blow to the jaw can sober them up. If the foolish find themselves out of dialogue, then only the threat of a blow. Once again I say we have nowhere to retreat! As in the 41st, our life and existence is at stake!
  33. Professor
    Professor 5 October 2016 15: 23
    0
    Quote: quilted jacket
    padded jacket Today, 15:12 ↑ New
    Quote: professor
    padded jacket, Murnia’s brains have already been found, or will it remain so brainless? wink
    Yeah, his brains are in the same place as the brains of Omri Chaim Elmakayes-Yakubovich

    So did they find his brains or not? I see you yourself are not sure.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 5 October 2016 15: 39
      +2
      Quote: professor
      So did they find his brains or not? I see you yourself are not sure.

      But what difference does it find or not?
      Mourney the hero and his whole life fought against the Israeli regime that occupied Palestine and the terrorists.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 5 October 2016 16: 32
        +1
        Israel and terrorists occupied - that’s generally great.
      2. Professor
        Professor 5 October 2016 19: 06
        0
        Quote: quilted jacket
        But what difference does it find or not?

        How is that any difference? We need to know if he had brains or how the rest of the anti-Semites were brainless.

        Quote: quilted jacket
        Mourney the hero and his whole life fought against the Israeli regime that occupied Palestine and the terrorists.

        Are you hinting that he still had no brains?
  34. Operator
    Operator 5 October 2016 15: 33
    +2
    In the event of an American strike on the airfields of the Syrian Air Force, a Russian strike will be delivered on the headquarters of the Syrian terrorists, where military advisers from the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar are located.
  35. Idunavs
    Idunavs 5 October 2016 15: 35
    0
    Bluff! They will not spend tomahawks on Syria (well, if the current is a couple of hundred), they all have at the moment (NATO and the United States) about 10 pieces. , and they need them for a "global strike" on us. They will take care.
    1. DmitryK
      DmitryK 10 October 2016 16: 19
      0
      Well, not really like that. They have the same shelf life.
  36. Stariknv
    Stariknv 5 October 2016 15: 35
    0
    Russia, yes, to warn the United States that during the bombing of Syrian government troops, planes will be shot down.
  37. cedar
    cedar 5 October 2016 16: 07
    0


    However, Krasukha-4 worked! And what about "Khibiny", "Vitebsk", "Mercury" and many other things to their santa claus from our Santa Claus ...
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 5 October 2016 16: 36
      +1
      It is not worth hoping for these electronic warfare systems - they will not work - Syria has confirmed this.
      1. Dali
        Dali 5 October 2016 16: 45
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        It is not worth hoping for these electronic warfare systems - they will not work - Syria has confirmed this.


        It is worth hoping for these electronic warfare systems - they will work - Syria has confirmed this.

        shl
        Well, who is right, adimius235 laughing ?!
  38. The comment was deleted.
  39. Freelancer7
    Freelancer7 5 October 2016 16: 25
    0
    Quote: Diana Ilyina
    Rom14 Today, 14:45
    They dragged the S-300 and immediately began to make excuses and explain to the whole world ..

    What to explain ?! What kind of world ?!
    when will our staff stop vigil

    Likely when you will be appointed the chief of the general staff ... Then, for sure, the khan of mattress!
    Until you thoroughly give Sam the teeth

    Why should there be little things, wail the Pentagon with a nuclear bomb, the whole world is in dust, so to speak ...


    In fact, he is right - the United States allows itself rudeness, and we do not allow this in relation to them. Resentment is understandable, but nothing can be done - as long as the alignment is not in our favor.
    1. Dali
      Dali 5 October 2016 16: 52
      0
      Quote: Freelancer7
      In fact, he is right - the United States allows itself rudeness, and we do not allow this in relation to them. Resentment is understandable, but nothing can be done - as long as the alignment is not in our favor.

      At the expense of the situation in Syria ... at another point to look ...
      And you can do a lot of things ... but your words are like "it's time to leave Syria, because nothing can be done !!!" - You are not freelancing in the State Department ?! laughing
  40. Razvedka_Boem
    Razvedka_Boem 5 October 2016 16: 39
    +1
    the Americans have covered Ukraine .. I think Russia’s asymmetric response will be to cover Mexico and the States themselves ..) Moreover, the situation there is far from splendor, and Texas has long wanted to leave the States.
  41. nnm
    nnm 5 October 2016 17: 29
    0
    Hmm .... all the same, whatever you say, but the world is sliding towards global confrontation (I just really don't want to use the word "war") ... and the reason will no longer matter ...
  42. PValery53
    PValery53 5 October 2016 17: 42
    0
    If the Pentagon is "ready to" accept "a lot of Calibers on its airfields in the US, why not agree with them ?!
  43. UZBEK TASHKENT
    UZBEK TASHKENT 5 October 2016 18: 19
    +1
    What we had to do before the loss of Su was to break down the runways of the countries participating in the destruction of Syria, namely: KSA, Turkey, Qatar with prior notice, so that the equipment would be removed. And now it's late, swallowed Su, swallowed the bombing in Deir Ez-Zor. Swallow and Destruction of the runway in Syria. Horror.
    1. Yak28
      Yak28 5 October 2016 20: 33
      0
      In the case of SU really shamefully swallowed request , although the blow to the airfield from where the Turkish phantom took off was just asking
      1. IGOR GORDEEV
        IGOR GORDEEV 6 October 2016 08: 12
        0
        Quote: Yak28
        In the case of the SU, they really swallowed shamefully, although the blow to the airfield from where the Turkish phantom took off was just asking

        Infa about a blown up bus with Turkish pilots passed. Or do you want more blood? Tie up with antidepressants!
  44. sir_obs
    sir_obs 5 October 2016 18: 20
    0
    It’s interesting, but there is a clause in the gas treaty that if there is aggression on the part of NATO against Russia or its armed forces, will it automatically shut off gas to NATO countries? Well, or something like that.
  45. Sergey333
    Sergey333 5 October 2016 18: 20
    +1
    Not enough for a plan B group of ships near Syria. It is necessary to charter an airfield in Cyprus and a group of naval aviation planes with torpedoes there. The Americans will try to make the first strike with tomahawks from submarines, for sure they are somewhere on the way.
    1. OLD FART
      OLD FART 5 October 2016 19: 29
      0
      Quote: Sergey333
      Not enough for a plan B group of ships near Syria. It is necessary to charter an airfield in Cyprus and a group of naval aviation planes with torpedoes there. The Americans will try to make the first strike with tomahawks from submarines, for sure they are somewhere on the way.

      I remember they launched "tomogavki" in the direction of Syria ... But then our ships stood in a row in front of the shores of Syria! They shot down and everything was quiet for a while ... Chemical weapons were taken out, out of harm's way ... But the USA is still small! I think it is necessary to bring up "pipeline" missiles and Hezbollah to the borders of Israel ... The conversation will go in a different format right away .. Or am I wrong comrades from Israel ..? bully
      1. padded jacket
        padded jacket 5 October 2016 20: 02
        0
        Quote: STARPER
        . Or am I wrong comrades from Israel ..?

        "Comrades" from Israel are now busy with their Hamas shelling Qassams and they are apparently sitting in the basements and trembling with fear. lol
        IDF checks why Iron Dome defended Sderot
        The IDF has launched an internal investigation to find out the reason for the inactivity of the Iron Dome missile defense system at the time of the launch of a rocket from the Gaza Strip in Sderot this morning. As previously reported, "kasam" fell in a residential area, as a result of which three people received shock injuries, smile and several buildings and cars were damaged.
        http://cursorinfo.co.il/news/mivzakim/2016/10/05/
        18-52 /
  46. Roust
    Roust 5 October 2016 18: 51
    +1
    Now there is a game on the fortress of nerves. In general, there is no turning back. It must be beaten first .... And for sure, so that you could not get up after that.
  47. SPB.RU
    SPB.RU 5 October 2016 20: 01
    0
    Pentagon ready to attack Syrian military airfields with Tomahawks

    The S-400s are capable of shooting down the KR, and let them prove it, otherwise I will cease to believe in our weapons.
    1. Yak28
      Yak28 5 October 2016 20: 27
      0
      It’s also interesting for me to look at our weapons in action, at planes, tanks, air defense, ships, and so on, judging by the fact that they say on TV we have almost any weapon that is the best in the world and has no analogues. The United States has many tomahawks and it seems to me that with a massive shelling (hundreds of missiles) of the Syrian positions, they will simply overload our air defense, and most missiles will not be shot down.
      1. Dali
        Dali 5 October 2016 23: 36
        0
        Quote: Yak28
        The United States has many tomahawks, and it seems to me that with a massive shelling (hundreds of missiles) of Syrian positions, they will simply overload our air defense, and most missiles will not be shot down.

        And if you think about it ... with your head ... then you can understand that no one has yet canceled the electronic warfare systems ...
    2. Dali
      Dali 5 October 2016 23: 30
      0
      Quote: SPB.RU
      The S-400s are capable of shooting down the KR, and let them prove it, otherwise I will cease to believe in our weapons.

      And from Peter whether you write such nonsense ...
      This is how to prove, to simplify the mattresses to pull the tomahawks for our strength ?! belay
  48. Mentat
    Mentat 5 October 2016 20: 29
    +4
    Quote: professor
    daughters of GDP work for the good of the motherland in Europe

    Putin directly answered a direct question in an interview that his daughters graduated from Russian universities, their data were not disclosed to the general public on security issues and they work in Russia (which is absolutely logical). Enough to spread this nonsense already.
  49. Flatter
    Flatter 6 October 2016 00: 20
    0
    The United States has every opportunity to choose. First, in the bare desert, Tomahawks, claiming that they are destroying ISIS, then it is possible on airfields. The air defense of both Syria and the Russian Federation will be disoriented, and in the final phase of the flight the chances of destroying a low-flying missile will sharply decrease. The distances there, between opposing insignificant, can deliberately, and apply to their green supporters to begin with.
  50. Uncle
    Uncle 6 October 2016 00: 38
    0
    Alex777,
    So already they scoffed, a couple of years ago, I don’t know from Ohio or from a surface ship, but missiles were shot down.
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 6 October 2016 00: 41
      0
      With Ohio, the last time they seemed to be fun in Libya.
      Ruins still. And Obama complains - wrong.
      By the way, where do you say Tomahawks shot down? recourse