Washington: "Why Russia C-300 in Syria, because the terrorists do not have aviation"

The Russian Defense Ministry expressed surprise at the violent reaction demonstrated in the United States about the latest modifications of the C-300 air defense system in Moscow sent by Syria. Major General Igor Konashenkov, a spokesman for the main defense department of the Russian Federation, noted that the US’s response looks strange, if only because C-300 is a purely defensive weapon.

According to Igor Konashenkov, Russia places anti-aircraft missile systems near the port of Tartus to cover the logistics base of the Russian Navy, as well as to cover a group of Russian ships in the eastern Mediterranean. Previously, the cover of the ship group and the port of Tartus was carried out by the missile cruiser “Moscow”, which had an air defense missile system on board.

In the US, meanwhile, announced that they would “carefully study the deployment of Russian anti-aircraft missile systems in Syria. Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook said this:

I would ask the question, what is the purpose of this system, if it is deployed? I think it's better to ask the Russians about it.

So the Russians have already answered you: so that the United States and their terrorist accomplices do not think that you can cover Russian objects in Syria from the air and wash your hands after that. Russian air defense systems, starting with the deployment of C-400 in Syria, are clearly sobering up some hotheads eager to strike.

Josh Ernest's comment (White House spokesman) on this issue (RIA News):

Russia contradicts itself. I do not know that IG or Al-Qaida (banned in the Russian Federation) have airplanes there. Russia may have other intelligence, but I deeply doubt it.

The cynicism of Mr. Ernest expresses the general cynicism of the US leadership. Apparently, Mr. Ernest deliberately “forgets” that the IS and Al-Qaida are a kind of terrorist franchise of the United States and their particular satellites. So no need to hang noodles about the fact that the IG and Al-Qaeda are separate, and the US is separate. It is better for Mr. Ernest to reconsider the speech of Donald Trump, in which he accuses H. Clinton and B. Obama of the actual creation of ISIS.

Comments

[Vladimirets]

I do not know that IS or Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia) have planes there.

The terrorists even have the F-22, and a lot.

[Hunt]

I am proud of my country and the General Staff in particular! (I wish the Finance Ministry, the Ministry of Economic Development and the Central Bank are like that) Finally, they started to act ahead of the curve! This is what is called - Strategic Initiative! There is aviation, there is no aviation - it does not matter, it is important that now there will definitely be no aviation! While the mattresses were scaring with bags for corpses, they were clearly shown to whom they would pack them! Howl will be scary, this is only the beginning!

[Tatyana]

Quote from the article
Washington: ".... terrorists don't have aviation"

In Washington, admit it! And who then just recently bombed a hospital in Aleppo with barrel bombs?
It turns out that the United States and its allies in the Western coalition in Syria!

[faridg7]

Quote: Tatiana

Quote from the article
Washington: ".... terrorists don't have aviation"

In Washington, admit it! And who then just recently bombed a hospital in Aleppo with barrel bombs?
It turns out that the United States and its allies in the Western coalition in Syria!

And then why is this?
http://rusnext.ru/recent_opinions/1449327803

[cniza]

They themselves ask a question and answer for it ourselves - a sobering-up station, a sobering-up station for especially violent ones.

[SRC P-15]

Washington: "Why does Russia need S-300 in Syria?

And so that Al-USAida does not get knocked out!

[Alex20042004]

Fushington is preparing a new September 11th.

[hrych]

Our operators need to look at the profile of the reflected signal, and their aces need to feel that their board is captured as a target, because there, on a pure angelic, the auto-informer will yell and the signal indicator will blink, it’s terrible after all ...

[Delink]

And then why is this?
http://rusnext.ru/recent_opinions/1449327803

I wish I could run Caliber there

[jetfors_84]

In my opinion it is clear and intelligible.

[Dryuya2]

Quote: faridg7

And then why is this?

well if it's true - Then maybe the teachings in Egypt for good reason ???

[_Vladislav_]

A challenge for the third grade.
Russia places the S-300 in Syria, but ISIS has no aircraft.
Question:
Why Russia S-300 in Syria)))))

[Felix99]

The S-300 is deployed in Syria to help US partners protect Europe from Iran’s missiles, in conjunction with missile defense systems deployed in Romania and Poland.

[501 Legion]

what kind of barrel bombs, which hospitals. take your head out of the sand or your goddamn facebook

[maks-101]

Russia and Syria need to declare a no-fly zone unilaterally for coalition allies. Get permission from Syria and fly, no permission to go through the forest.

[novel66]

there are few forests there - let them go in the desert

[sharp-lad]

Saudi desert!

[Awaz]

This had to be done a long time ago, from the very beginning of the participation of the air forces in the Syrian war.

[portyanka]

Our missile defense systems in Syria are also "solely to protect Europe from a missile attack by North Korea."

[Tusv]

Quote: portyanka

Our missile defense systems in Syria are also "solely to protect Europe from a missile attack by North Korea."

Ay ah yay. It is necessary to go to polit information. There is nothing worse than Somali pirates. Take off from the Gulf of Arden, capture aircraft., Rape European women. And the most sacrilegious, they shout, saying that Merkel is not real. Well, in general, until air defense is deployed in Palmyra, European values ​​are at stake

[portyanka]

I agree. Somali pirates are a good idea.

The Red Army had long had to take the EU under protection from the Somali pirates and the North Korean missile threat.
The US and NATO are clearly failing in their responsibilities to defend human rights and democracy. It's time to put them in a naphthalene box.

[Tusv]

Quote: portyanka

The Red Army had long had to take the EU under protection from the Somali pirates and the North Korean missile threat.

What are you all about North Korea when the Haitian adherents of the Voodoo cult have already sewed a doll the size of America and brought up a bloody pin. Here it is necessary to save America, and then think about North Korean missiles. Democracy in danger

[portyanka]

Tusv, you do not see the forest behind the trees.
BY KE MO NU!
pokemons penetrate .... penetrate the brain of Americans through ... this ... you know ...

and now with these rear-wheel drive Pokemon can only cope through Pinocchio.

[WKS]

In the USA or slow-witted or cunning. Anti-aircraft systems are needed in Syria in order for those American military personnel who have an itch in the rectum to eliminate it. A purely medical and humanitarian action aimed at maintaining the health of Americans. What's so bad about that?

[Starover_Z]

Quote: Tatiana

Tatyana Today, 07:23 ↑
Quote from the article
Washington: ".... terrorists don't have aviation"
In Washington, admit it! And who then just recently bombed a hospital in Aleppo with barrel bombs?

And one more thing: Since the terrorists do not have aviation, why then try to declare a "no-fly zone" over Syria ?!

[Warrior with machine gun]

she has it, mainly airplanes with an index F, with small things on board like marine corps or air force.

[Rom14]

We would also have learned to do things without explanations and excuses in front of the "world" vile community ...

[with]

Due to the fact that the United States, their six "coalition" were unable to SEPARATE the "moderate opposition" from the "immoderate terrorists" (outside the brackets, consisting of the same people) and began open air support for ANY illegal armed formations opposing the SAA and VKS , the Aerospace Forces and the SAA have no other choice but to SAVE themselves from forces that do not fulfill the agreement and constantly arrange bloody provocations.

[INVESTOR]

"Why does Russia need S-300 in Syria, because terrorists have no aviation"

Behind the house, calmer so

[Azim77]

Exactly then, why does the USA in Poland, in the Czech Republic need missile defense, because Iran does not have such long-range missiles?

[WKS]

In the USA or slow-witted or cunning. Anti-aircraft systems are needed in Syria in order for those American military personnel who have an itch in the rectum to eliminate it. A purely medical and humanitarian action aimed at maintaining the health of Americans. What's so bad about that?

[vkl.47]

why terrorists don’t have planes？ have！ and the flag on these planes is star-striped

[Saffron]

And these terrorists have a debt of a couple of tens of trillions of dollars! The only thing missing is their conscience and the brains of their subjects!

[Damir]

Here is the F-35 and F-16 .... they have a lot of this muck ...

[GSH-18]

Igor Konashenkov noted that the US reaction looks strange, if only because the S-300 is a purely defensive weapon

This is not entirely true. There is the possibility of firing at ground targets. Naturally, this is an option. No one in their right mind will begin to bullet in the usual situation with expensive anti-aircraft missiles at ground targets.

[Alexanast]

This is not entirely true. Exist

And why should everyone - then tell ...

[mr.redpartizan]

Read my mind. Not only F-22, but also aircraft carriers.

[Incvizitor]

All who attack the troops of Syria are terrorists and their accomplices.

[Thirteenth]

"Why does Russia need S-300 in Syria, because terrorists have no aviation"

What do you mean why? The terrorist state of the United States has the most powerful navy in the world. And since the key aspect with terrorists is the availability of a quality baton, the S-300 is the very thing ...

[aba]

The US terrorist state has the most powerful

But it’s true, if this did not concern the Americans, they would not begin to show their surprise ... So apparently they wanted to miss again, but for other purposes ... And then there is such an ambush!

[another RUSICH]

I dare to object: the United States is moderate terrorists. maximum, atomic bomb will be thrown at the city, no more. And so they are quiet, quiet ....

[svp67]

Washington: "Why Russia C-300 in Syria, because the terrorists do not have aviation"

Well, no need to pose as complete idiots. WHY ASKING? And this is a preventive measure to repel the HYPOTHETICAL air threat from terrorist aviation. Do you understand that it’s too far for us to bring everything up, so they drove it in advance ... And what, someone already has "knees trembling"? So on the thief and the hat burns ...
And yet, according to the message of our Defense Ministry, the S-300VM Antey-2500 air defense system (SA-23 Gladiator in NATO classification) was transferred to Syria and there are NOT ANY KRAZ, so the photo on the screen saver is incorrect ...

[Felix99]

And I see in these photos two mobile (mobile) minarets. In order to carry Faith in Bright Tomorrow to the masses of militants. Naturally they will be oriented towards Mecca

[vfqjh]

That damn you will be no-fly zone !!!

[kush62]

"Unknown" terrorists' accomplices very often "by mistake" bomb hospitals, civilians, and the troops of the Syrian army. In order not to "accidentally" end up in a Russian military unit, S300 and S400 appear there.

[botsman80]

... to protect allies from "allies" ...

[newcomer]

why why? you trah.hat, amerskie terrorists.

[Nix1986]

Of course, no one will tell us this, but it is not entirely clear within the framework of which program the air defense is being transferred there now ?! Specifically, it is clear, but within the framework of what general program ?! The question should be, what are our goals in Syria? If the fight, and hence the victory of Ishil and other bearded men, then 90% of us will have to get involved in the ground phase and only then will we end this and emerge as "heroes". If it is just the provision of feasible air assistance and raising the country's rating, then for the time spent there it can be understood that victory cannot be achieved only by air participation and either we need a ground phase or we will continue to simply provide air support, though it is not clear how long, or if the situation develops unfavorably for the Syrian army, then our base may be under attack and here you want it or not, you will have to be drawn in full, or it is shameful to run and you can not talk about any increase in the rating. Well, or the most optimistic plan - the Syrian army will become professional and, with our help, will finish off the bearded men, but analyzing the past tense, I personally doubt this, and therefore I ask these questions, but what next ?!

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Nix1986

no one will say this, but it is not entirely clear within the framework of which program air defense is being transferred there ?! It’s concrete, but within the framework of what general program ?! The question should be, what are our goals in Syria?

In very brief terms, this is what the GDP said about our goals in Syria ...

[Nix1986]

Yes, I saw it, thank you, but this is a statement to the press, we will never know the real agreements, or later in someone’s memoirs.

[A jacket]

Quote: Nix1986

... 90% of us will have to get involved in the ground phase and only then will we end this and come out as "heroes".

If you are such a hero, then go to Syria and join a ground operation as part of the militia. It is so good to argue: "Let someone crawl under the bullets, and I'll sit on the couch and analyze." My personal attitude to the discussion of the ground operation in Syria is exactly that.
Every life of our compatriot is invaluable. And I believe in what is happening now - the optimal combination of actions for a planned movement towards a goal.
What will happen next? Who the hell guesses! If everything was so simple, then somehow it would have ended.

[Nix1986]

Is the hangover heavy? I just set out the options and he is not alone there, no one calls to grab a mosinka, wrap himself with St. George's ribbon and run into the attack "For Putin".

[Warrior with machine gun]

let Iran fuss on earth, they are also directly affected by a mess, they may well be the following

[katalonec2014]

They fear that the S-300 is intended to directly cover the advancing ground forces of the Syrian army, have they probably watched the news? Americans are considering striking at the Syrian Army, and this raises a reasonable question: WILL RUSSIA COVER?

[Banishing liberoids]

And where does the United States do its aviation just write that they don’t have it? Syrian air defense needs a couple of "mistakes" to discourage mattresses from flying in someone else's sky

[A jacket]

Quote: Expelling Liberoids

And where does the United States do its aviation just write that they don’t have it? Syrian air defense needs a couple of "mistakes" to discourage mattresses from flying in someone else's sky

It’s not worth the price of such a politician who will allow it. Pandora's box will open simply. In my heart, I also want our C300 Americans to be snapped on the nose. But these ambitions are childish compared to their consequences. This must not be forgotten. The Americans have enough resources to level a substantial part of Syria to the "0" mark with non-nuclear weapons, and the Russian bases may not be affected. The concentration zones of Syrian troops will be declared dangerous territories, the peacekeepers will be associated with losses, and hundreds of tomahawks flew from three sides. What will we oppose them? We must not forget about people!
Russia will not go to a direct conflict with the United States in Syria. Not a single American aircraft will be shot down. 100%.

[Warrior with machine gun]

given time etm reptiles overseas ship with shahids send

[16112014nk]

Quote: Jacket

Not a single American aircraft will be shot down. 100%.

As Ostap Bender said, "only an insurance policy can give complete peace of mind (100%)." Here it is more likely, as in the joke about the blonde - 50 to 50. Either they will shoot down or not.

[Darth Revan]

Well, after all, the USA has aviation! This is quite enough!

[Delink]

They have there in Syria and a clearing is developed. And Russia even knows where!
Only this need to provide the Syrians with a shot at them.

[Yak28]

Interestingly, the United States will begin to launch air strikes on the Syrian army in which Russian instructors and equipment, S-300 calculations will bring down US planes, or will we wait when our plane gets down?

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Yak28

Interestingly, the United States will begin to launch air strikes on the Syrian army in which Russian instructors and equipment, S-300 calculations will bring down US planes, or will we wait when our plane gets down?

I understand from some sources that the mattress "erroneous blow" on the positions of Assad's troops, during which more than 60 soldiers were killed (and it seems like our advisers were there) did not go unanswered. As a retaliatory measure, the "bearded" coordination center was destroyed in which specialists from the United States, Israel, Canada and Britain were located. After that, the mattresses announced the termination of cooperation and won back at the embassy ...
The story is a little lit up, but something tells us that it could well have taken place ...

[n0isy]

And there dates are not mixed up in events? It seemed to me that the headquarters was before. Or is it another headquarters?

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: n0isy

And there dates are not mixed up in events? It seemed to me that the headquarters was before. Or is it another headquarters?

Earlier (a month and a half ago) there was a message about the destruction of the base, which a couple of days before that the mattresses were left to exclude its use by barmaley. And then it seems like the headquarters worked soon after the "mistake".

[hohryakov066]

In addition to purely political goals, Russia pursues practical goals in Syria. Training in combat conditions of crews and crews is expensive. And then the combination. Savings again. Well, if the "partners" still have a point - it's a song!

[valersvet]

THE DOG BARKS, THE CARAVAN IS GOING.

[demo]

Terrorists have such identification marks. For them, the S-300 arrived.

[tommy717]

Just the main world terrorists have what it is possible to shoot down the S-300

[aviapit123]

Et that would not be "wrong" shtatovtsy on SAR .....

[another RUSICH]

Funny sailors. Write down the answer that you have already been told: to protect the contingent of the aerospace forces in Syria! Dumb? Repeat again?

[Volzhanin]

Maybe it’s time to present to the abominations - what are they doing in Syria and who called them there?
At the same time, begin to massively destroy everyone who does not belong to the Syrian army, mainly the "Natava military men" who are clustered around the terrorists.
It would also be nice to organize voluntary special forces for snipers and Holullays like, who will purposefully destroy all NATO employees. That would be the case!
Themselves from Syria will run sparkling with their heels, because Western bastards do not agree to die for no good!

The rhetoric of all of our. persons on the Syrian issue recalls an apology.

[Stinger]

Why play cat and mouse and wonder? At first they threaten that Russian planes may fall in Syria, and then languidly roll their eyes to the response. Why US missile defense systems in Romania and Poland? After all, the Poles and Romanians do not have missiles ?.

[Stanislas]

Quote: Stinger

And why the American missile defense systems in Romania and Poland? After all, the Poles and Romanians do not have missiles?

Right! Iran, from which the United States allegedly protects Europe from a nuclear strike, does not have the means to deliver nuclear weapons, as does the nuclear weapons themselves. But these jackals have double morality everywhere.

[fa2998]

Quote: svp67

You ask WHY?

Firstly, our "partners" in Syria have aircraft that regularly bomb our allies, the Syrian government troops. Secondly, maybe D. Ernest himself knows how many US air defense troops were brought to the BG in case of a terrorist attack from the air (even the destruction of passenger aircraft was considered with civilians on board).
Let him say better "THANKS" for our patience, otherwise we will arrange a no-fly zone over Syria - they were definitely not invited there!

[RUS96]

Quote: Hunter

Bye Mattress

I ask you to write "mattress covers" with a small letter. They do not deserve honorable respect.

[UZBEK TASHKENT]

Do not forget, there is already a C400. C300 is a reminder that we can start to land, and at the same time, C400 is a signal that we can land but we can. In short trouble.

[Stas157]

Quote: UZBEK TASHKENT

Do not forget, there is already a C400. C300 is a reminder that we can start to land, and at the same time, C400 is a signal that we can land but we can. In short trouble.

Just one S-400 division is too small, as the Americans of the Kyrgyz Republic have too many. An additional S-300, which will cover Tartus and our ships, obviously does not hurt.
I understand the additional air defense system is needed to expand the umbrella, and so that our S-400 partners could not stupidly crush the number of missiles.

[Taygerus]

S-300 is for the birds from the coalition, so as not to lick their lips once again, for the landing of an exceptional terrorist aircraft that accidentally decides to make a mistake

[mamont5]

"Why does Russia need S-300 in Syria, because terrorists have no aviation"

Not yet, but they (the terrorists) have owners. Here for them C-300 (and C-400) are intended.

[Observer2014]

Damascus also needs to be protected from a blow from the sky. Yes, under Palmyra, the Buk did not interfere with The effectiveness of the air defense complex increases at times when one complex complements and overlaps the radius of destruction of another.

[Skubudu]

Quote: Observer2014

Damascus also needs to be protected from a blow from the sky. Yes, under Palmyra, the Buk did not interfere with The effectiveness of the air defense complex increases at times when one complex complements and overlaps the radius of destruction of another.

That's right, it's time to air defense in Syria.

[midivan]

[/ quote] Major-General Igor Konashenkov, spokesman for the Russian defense ministry, noted that the US reaction is strange, if only because the S-300 is a purely defensive weapon. [quote]

And so the question is for respected forum users wearing or wearing shoulder straps - How long does Igor Konashenkov have to troll and scoff at the Americans to become a lieutenant general?

[uskrabut]

If the situation in Syria is resolved, they will give ahead of schedule Marshal of the Soviet Union

[midivan]

Quote: uskrabut

If the situation in Syria resolves

I apologize and how?
Igor Evgenievich Konashenkov
Russian military leader. Head of the Office of the Press Service and Information of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation since August 30, 2011. Head of the Department of Information and Communications of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation since August 1, 2016. Major General. Wikipedia
Born May 15, 1966 (50 years old), Chisinau

[Wedmak]

troll and mock the Americans

It's priceless!

[Evil 55]

Place and declare a "no-fly" zone 40 kilometers away so that the BiPL is not fired.

[Wedmak]

It would seem that the logic of the Americans is nowhere to be surprised, but no. That is, it is possible and necessary to bomb the Syrian army on Syrian soil, arbitrarily invading Syrian land, but the installation of air defense on the basis of an officially invited ally of Damascus is an out of the ordinary event. Where is the list of sanctions for the 2016-2017 year? You still haven't entered everything? And enough for 2018?
However, what am I talking about? It is we, Syria and the Russian Federation, who are fighting terrorists, the Americans are using them. Now, now everything has come together, the logic is correct.

[dsm100]

A no-fly zone for everyone.

[Watchdog]

And C-300 is needed so that Deir Ez-Zor does not happen again. They will want to bomb the Merikos government troops of the SAR, and get their downed planes. Here for this. So what? I do not like?

[Moor]

Washington: "Why does Russia need S-300 in Syria?
Why does the TV need a stabilizer? And not too much was excited

[Mwg]

How do terrorists have no planes ?! But isn't the US Air Force a terrorist aircraft?

[Colonel]

What for...? What for...? For the same, why do they need missile defense from North Korea in Romania.

[gispanec]

Quote: mamont5

"Why does Russia need S-300 in Syria, because terrorists have no aviation"

Not yet, but they (the terrorists) have owners. Here for them C-300 (and C-400) are intended.

c300 there right now to land axes with which minke whales can begin to knock down asad !!!

[jovanni]

Washington: "Why Russia C-300 in Syria, because the terrorists do not have aviation"

And so it was. Just in case, it will suddenly appear. Considering the pace with which the "dear partners" began to supply modern weapons to the bandits, and it is not far from aviation ...

[yuri p]

SAM S-300 in Syria to sober up empty heads from any "mistakes".

[rus-5819]

Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook said:
I would ask the question, what is the purpose of this system, if it is deployed? I think it's better to ask the Russians about it.
Go, Peter Pan (in the sense of Cook) to ... Wikipedia
Designed for the defense of large industrial and administrative facilities, military bases and command posts from attacks by enemy airborne attacks. Able to hit ballistic and aerodynamic targets. It became the first multichannel anti-aircraft missile system, capable of tracking up to 6 targets and directing up to 12 missiles along each complex (SAM).

[Old26]

Maybe someone can answer that all the same went to Syria? They talked about S-300V4, now they talk about S-300?

[Alex20042004]

Horseradish alone (S-300 and S-400), only the sizes are different!

[Wedmak]

C-300 are also different. Specifically, the C-300B4 is the latest modification of the military air defense system. I quote:
"The S-300V4 system, in comparison with the systems of the previous generation, has an area that is two to three times covered from air strikes and an increased range of the border of the zone of destruction of air targets. These parameters, in particular, provide guaranteed interception of warheads of medium-range ballistic missiles."
It turns out that there is C-300В4 and С-400. Looks like they decided to compare the operational parameters in combat conditions.

[water]

A strange question, especially from the Americans. "Washington:" Why does Russia need S-300 in Syria, because terrorists do not have aviation? "- It's clear, to defend against North Korean ballistic missiles.

[user3970]

People, why in the morning are you all so excited? Now, if, at the request of Castro, if the Iskanders and REBs were put in place to protect the canal under construction in Nicaragua and the NPS were driven into Norway on a leased naval base, that would be interesting. And so, boring.

[uskrabut]

Something tells me that this is what matters. This will be the next logical step.

[Diviz]

I look forward to when robots (uranium 9) appear in Syria! Amers foam from the mouth to pour.

[ArhipenkoAndrey]

It's funny, however, they themselves promised to shoot down Syrian and Russian planes, and now the question is why did Russia bring the S-300 to Syria? Unclear. But in general, it’s like in the joke - "Oh man is coming, let us mark him, but if he is us, and why are we?

[uskrabut]

"I do not know that IS or Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia) have planes there."

For that our very unreliable and very inadequate "partners" have planes. These partners have already managed to bomb government forces instead of terrorists. So, so that they do not fly over Syria and do not bomb right and left indiscriminately, and we need air defense systems.
For efficiency, respect to the Russian Defense Ministry ("Salute the Boy!", - as Yegorkin's grandfather wrote, and Yegorka himself grew up Bad, sold for a barrel of jam a basket of cookies)

[Alex20042004]

There is only one question. Who invited the United States to Syria?
The USA is a sponsor of terrorism in the Middle East.

[NUR]

Kebab from moderate opposition. Perhaps he invited the United States flocked to the smell.

[NUR]

If possible, Syria needs to acquire its own air defense systems at least beeches in addition to shells, of course it would be ideal from 300 but not to fat. There were no modern air defense systems in Libya, and this is the result. Libya’s money is not known where, but they didn’t spend on modern weapons, the avaricious pays twice.

[Gormenghast]

The terrorist international has aviation.

[Romanenko]

It's time to call a spade a spade, the terrorists have an army, aviation and navy. It’s just that they still act with the hands of helpers and, for the time being, don’t give them, the ISIL and other rubbish moderate and immoderate rubbish, into the hands of serious weapons, and the C 300 in Tartus is just to maintain the status quo, for those who are poor I saw the C 400 on the base of Khmeimim, we need to talk with terrorists exclusively from a position of strength, alas, they don’t understand another language, have lost the habit, and it’s time to get used to it again.
There is such an old almost forgotten Russian proverb: Today is a robber, tomorrow is a dead .... Very relevant!

[Monarchist]

Thanks for the saying, I have not seen one

[forester]

SRTS P-15,
Well they wanted a no-fly zone - get and sign)))

[Vlad5307]

The main terrorist is the SGA with its anti-people State Department and the CIA, who are in the service not of the people of the SGA, but of transnational companies, whose management has long crushed state structures for themselves. And the incomplete aviation at the head of the chief is still like dirt - that is why Russia has to defend itself from "erroneous" air strikes from "partners" in Syria.