Military Review

As in the city, in Kazan ...

39



464 a year ago, 2 October 1552, the 150-thousandth Russian army stormed Kazan. Kazan Khanate was destroyed, and its territory became part of Russia. This day can be considered the first milestone in the transformation of the Russian kingdom into the great Eurasian empire - the largest power of the planet, and possibly the entire universe, if the earth civilization in it is unique.

Having crushed the strongest enemy in the east, Russia has opened for itself the path of "meet the Sun" - to the Urals, to Siberia and further down to the Pacific Ocean. The era of the "Russian conquest" began, only, unlike the Spanish and Portuguese conquistodors, the Russians managed to keep the new lands and incorporate their indigenous population into the imperial superethnos.

For obvious reasons, October 2 is not celebrated as a national holiday and the day of Russia's military glory. However, not wanting to infringe upon or offend the Tatars and paying tribute to their courage in upholding their independence, I believe that we must not forget about this date and downplay its importance. By the way, the theme of the battle for Kazan, in my opinion, could be an excellent plot for a grand historic blockbuster. It is a pity that directors who are able to master such a project are not yet visible.

On the screen saver - the Russian army at the walls of Kazan. Sketch of the panel for the design of the Kazan station in Moscow, made by Nicholas Roerich. Next - paintings by Russian artists, dedicated to the latest act of opposition to the Russian kingdom and the Kazan Khanate.



"Battle for Kazan" - an epic canvas of the modern Kazan painter Ilyas Faizullin.



The main and almost the only subject of the Russian academic artists of the XVIII-XIX centuries, who addressed the subject of the conquest of the Kazan Khanate, was an image of how the population of the city humbly expresses submission to Tsar Ivan-IV. The fact that such paintings are offensive to "foreigners", in those days did not think. On the left - a typical example of such creativity - GI Ugryumov's painting "Taking of Kazan", 1800 year.
Now they are drawing in a completely different way: On the right is the painting by Ilyas Faizullin "The Ruler of Kazan, Syuyumbike is held captive by Ivan the Terrible."



Another drawing, on which Tatar Murzas kneel and knight bunchyks in front of Tsar Ivan. Author A.D. Kivshenko, 1880 year.



And this is a picture of P.M. Shamshina "Joining of John IV to Kazan", 1890 year. The Khan is presented with a golden golden cap and the prisoners are brought, and his horse steps on the Tatar flag thrown at his feet. At the same time, Kazan residents, who do not want to give up, throw children down and are thrown out of the windows, but no one pays attention to this.



The plots of contemporary artists are more diverse: V. Bodrov’s painting "The Siege of Kazan in 1552 Year."



Painting of the member of the Russian Academy of Arts Firinat Khalikov "The last battle at the Khan's palace". In the center with the Qur'an depicts Imam Kul Sharif, who died in the battle for Kazan. Now the largest Kazan mosque, opened in 2005, is named after him.
Author:
Originator:
http://vikond65.livejournal.com/544662.html
39 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. parusnik
    parusnik 4 October 2016 06: 36
    +5
    Yes .. I remember the period of the decline of perestroika, and then the period of "take sovereignty as much as you want", otherwise it was not said about the "occupation" of Kazan ... but asked for it ...
    1. guzik007
      guzik007 4 October 2016 10: 08
      +6
      Yes .. I remember at the end of perestroika, and then the period of "take sovereignty as much as you want", otherwise it was not said about the "occupation" of Kazan
      -------------------------------------------------
      ---------------------------
      You know, I am not happy with our local kings. But we must give them their due. If in due time they didn’t bargain for special taxation conditions for the Republic of Tatarstan, I think we would now have exactly what the richest Siberian regions have at present. Poverty and devastation with the total removal of money earned from the bowels of the earth to Moscow.
      I will say more, if in the 90s the governors had not caved in under the drunks and oligarchs, then we would have now a completely different country, at least the level of condition of fellow citizens in other regions would have been similar to ours, Tatarstan.



      . Peacefully ... but asked for it ..
      ---------------------------------------
      Enlighten please how exactly. The source of knowledge in the studio.
      1. sibirak10
        sibirak10 4 October 2016 12: 40
        +3
        I live in the Tyumen region, and for a long time. Poverty and devastation in the Siberian regions exists only in your head.
        1. Cat
          Cat 4 October 2016 17: 30
          +2
          I live in the Sverdlovsk region, definitely not worse than in Tatarstan.
          1. guzik007
            guzik007 4 October 2016 21: 00
            +2
            I live in the Sverdlovsk region, definitely not worse than in Tatarstan.
            -------------------------------------------------
            ----------------------------------

            Why on earth did Eburg end up behind the Urals? Although ... you know, by its specificity of work, comparing infant mortality between you and us, I sympathize with you quietly ... Yes, and Kazan, no offense to you, compared to your city and your cities compared to our towns ....
            Better come and compare. I can give you a real alignment of salaries in comparison. If interested, write in a personal. Regards ...
        2. guzik007
          guzik007 4 October 2016 20: 58
          0
          I live in the Tyumen region, and for a long time.-
          -------------------------------------------------
          -----------------------

          Come on vacation to visit us-sure-cry.
    2. Rastas
      Rastas 4 October 2016 20: 55
      +1
      It was impossible otherwise. The Ottoman Empire climbed through its Crimean vassals to the Caucasus. and from there the path to the Astrakhan and Kazan khanates opened. As a result, the Russian kingdom was in a semicircle. Also added was the desire to control the Volga basin for unhindered trade.
    3. Akuzenka
      Akuzenka 8 October 2016 01: 08
      +1
      Tryndet not to roll bags "Khan" Mintimir Sharipovich, quickly showed everyone where the crayfish winter. The Nazis quickly deflated. By the way, in those days I saw a rare picture, the unity of the Natsiks of different nationalities.
  2. V.ic
    V.ic 4 October 2016 06: 53
    +6
    Lots of pictures, but little history. In a local museum, in the mouth of an art guide, it would sound good. A very provocative article. By the way, the troops of Ivan IV included not only Russians, but also Tatars. In the previous era, the Horde "built" Russia, but already in the 16th century the reverse process began.
    1. Cat
      Cat 4 October 2016 07: 17
      +2
      Among the defenders of Kazan, there were also Russians. Meschera, Murom, Vyatichi, Tatars and Nogais fought on both sides of the "barricades". The solyanka was still the same, but all this does not implore the valor and bravery of the warriors on both sides. Ultimately, before the emergence of St. Petersburg. Kazan was the third most important city of the Muscovite kingdom, it had its own order and its own management system. Currently it is one of the ten "pearls" of Russia.
      1. Monarchist
        Monarchist 4 October 2016 13: 07
        +2
        Speak correctly
      2. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 10 October 2016 20: 15
        +1
        In my opinion, during this period there was already no caveman, murom and Vyatichi.
      3. fanfan tulpan
        fanfan tulpan 15 December 2016 01: 02
        +1
        Ivan the Terrible three times approached the walls of Kazan, but didn’t leave the elephant without slurping. For the fourth time, he approached the city with 150 thousand troops, and the defenders of Kazan were 30 thousand. A ratio of one to five was then the norm, but Kazan was inferior to the Russians in armament and this decided the outcome of the capture of Kazan. By that time, Russian had siege guns and with their help destroyed the walls of Kazan.
    2. Akuzenka
      Akuzenka 8 October 2016 01: 10
      +2
      And on both sides there was a team "hodgepodge". It was not about "independence" it was, but about henchmen. Ours or Turkish. And they were "independent" anyway.
  3. PKK
    PKK 4 October 2016 07: 26
    +1
    In those days, the troops were several thousand soldiers, but not 150 thousand. And which country was the capital of Tobolsk with the Tsar and the tsar’s, preserved decrees from there. The history is greatly erased and distorted.
    All historical works must be perceived as works of art, but not strictly scientific.
    1. Cat
      Cat 4 October 2016 07: 42
      +5
      Firstly, not from Tobolsk, but from Isker. The kingdom was Siberian, and it was abolished only under Peter I. The title of Ivan IV "Tsar of Siberia" appeared when Khan Edygei was accepted as tribute, just after the fall of Kazan and the annexation of Astrakhan. After Yermak's campaign, Isker was captured, for three years it was an operational base of the Cossacks, but after the death of the ataman, he was left. Tobolsk was founded 15 versts from Isker by the governor D. Chulkov. Under him, Isker was finally destroyed, and For 400 years Tobolsk remained the secular and spiritual capital of the Siberian kingdom, later the Tobolsk province. Moreover, according to the analogy with the Kazan kingdom, it had its own order - Siberian.
  4. PKK
    PKK 4 October 2016 07: 32
    0
    I’ll add how many plows and shuttles you need to make to transport 150 thousand fighters, if 50 were seated on one seagull. 3 gulls are obtained. Of course, such an event would have left something in History, but this is not known. Further, how many ships would fit on the Siberian rivers. Of course they would fit, but would stretch over 000 Km. Hardly anyone wanted to get involved with such power, people would just run away into the woods from sin.
    1. Cat
      Cat 4 October 2016 08: 37
      +1
      A seagull on the rivers of Siberia? Nonses.
      Regarding the number of troops I agree - an exaggeration. But the fact that a full-scale preparatory operation was carried out is a fact. Even the city in the upper Volga was built as an operational base.
      1. fanfan tulpan
        fanfan tulpan 15 December 2016 01: 36
        +1
        I advise you to read the book by Stepan Zlobin "Two Capitals".
    2. fanfan tulpan
      fanfan tulpan 15 December 2016 01: 09
      +2
      If you studied at a military academy, you would know that even in modern conditions, to take the citadel, you need a ratio of one to three, and in those days, the ratio was one to five.
  5. 2-0
    2-0 4 October 2016 10: 20
    0
    Um, about the insult to feelings (s) ... I heard that Ermak Timofeevich swore Siberia, putting, um, his penis on a stump, and, um, submissive, this member, so to speak, swore, kissed ... Well, it was a fun time ....
    1. Witness 45
      Witness 45 4 October 2016 22: 16
      +2
      He composed this nonsense, or who helped?
      Quote: 2-0
      Um, about the insult to feelings (s) ... I heard that Ermak Timofeevich swore Siberia, putting, um, his penis on a stump, and, um, submissive, this member, so to speak, swore, kissed ... Well, it was a fun time ....
      1. 2-0
        2-0 5 October 2016 10: 02
        +1
        Svidetel 45! But you don’t know the Russian language, read the book, see a fig? It is written, clearly and understandably, b, - "I have heard it"! What got it started? Did your ancestors kiss at Ermak's? Ordinary, right?

        And please, address strangers on "you"! To avoid....
    2. Akuzenka
      Akuzenka 8 October 2016 01: 20
      +1
      And the ancient Ukrainians dug up the Black Sea.
    3. fanfan tulpan
      fanfan tulpan 15 December 2016 01: 11
      +1
      This is a fiction composed in the zone by convicts from boredom.
  6. PKK
    PKK 4 October 2016 10: 28
    +1
    [quote = Kitten] Seagull on the rivers of Siberia? Nonses.
    Regarding the number of troops I agree - an exaggeration. But the fact that a full-scale preparatory operation was carried out is a fact. Even the city in the upper Volga was built as an operational base. [/ Quote]
    In those days, all settlements, from London to Amur, were based on the banks of the rivers. All logistics were on the rivers. Horses were not needed. And there were no roads.
    On the rivers sailed not only troops, but also art and cannonballs and all supplies, on barges. The seagull was named for example, the ships were of various types [quote = Kotische] Firstly, not from Tobolsk, but from Isker. The kingdom was Siberian, and it was abolished only under Peter I. The title of Ivan IV "Tsar of Siberia" appeared
    Where is Peter 1 and where is Tobolsk? Peter was like a donkey to get to Tobolsk, through the two Kingdoms, Muscovy and Siberian, as you say, although there is information that there was the city of Siberia, hence the name. Peter 1 had the task of staking out the mouth of the Neva and capturing rivers, even to the headwaters, dragging. What he did.
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 4 October 2016 10: 49
      +3
      PKK "through two Kingdoms, Muscovy and Siberia"

      Dear, how did Vitus Bering "and his comrades" get to Kamchatka with ship supplies? feel Why didn't the "Tartarians / Tartarians" hinder him in this? After all, two whole ships were equipped for sailing on the "Bering Sea" in search of "the land of João de Gama." This is a direct attempt on the secret knowledge of the geography of Great Tartary! negative
    2. Cat
      Cat 4 October 2016 13: 45
      +3
      Let's go in order:
      1. The Cossack gull had a keel, was used in the open sea, limited to the mouth of the Dnieper (below the thresholds). Strug was flat-bottomed and used on rivers.
      2. The full title of Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible sounded like this: "Great Sovereign, by God's grace the Tsar and Grand Duke of All Russia, Vladimir, Moscow, Novgorod, Pskov, Ryazan, Tver, Yugorsky, Perm, Vyattsky, Bulgarian and others", subsequently, with the expansion borders of the Russian state, to the title was added "Tsar of Kazan, Tsar of Astrakhan, Tsar of Siberia", "and the sovereign of all Northern countries.
      The Tsar of Siberia appears in the title at the turn of the 60s of the 16th century, with the acceptance of tribute to the people of Siberia and an annual tribute of 30 sables. But with the seizure of power in the Siberian Khanate by the "Hare Horde" by Khan Kuchum, relations deteriorate and the protectorate over the khanate ceases. But in the title of Ivan "Tsar of Siberia" it remains. Only with the flare-up of the Siberian Khanate by Ermak and the construction of the city of Tobolsk, the title ceases to be formal.
      Moreover, Ugra formally entered the title of Russian Grand Dukes under Ivan’s grandfather, he was also called Prince Pelymsky, who is also in Siberia.
      3. Under Peter I, Tatishchev founded a plant on the Iset River later named in honor of Catherine I - Yekaterinburg. During the construction of the dam and the plant, soldiers of the Tobolsk regiment were involved. And Yekaterinburg itself was part of the first Tobolsk, and later Perm province, which is documented and confirmed by archaeological finds. On this traveled V. Bereng through the territory of one country.
    3. Akuzenka
      Akuzenka 8 October 2016 01: 30
      0
      What is your cereal in your head ...... I guess this knowledge was obtained in the best universities in Europe .....
    4. fanfan tulpan
      fanfan tulpan 15 December 2016 01: 15
      0
      Siberia is formed from two Tatar words "shap" and "er" - means good land.
  7. PKK
    PKK 4 October 2016 12: 45
    0
    Quote: V.ic

    Dear, how did Vitus Bering "and his comrades" get to Kamchatka with ship supplies? feel Why didn't the "Tartarians / Tartarians" hinder him in this? After all, two ships were equipped for sailing on the "Bering Sea"

    Then the times were calmer than now, and the travelers didn’t cut their heads just like that, especially the travelers. Yes, and the expedition just doesn’t take the security all the same.
    Surely there was some where toll fare, pay and swim.
    Such expeditions are affirmed at a high level, there were letters of protection, assistance during the breaks, and food. All Siberia is sewn with rivers and tributaries, knowing the routes, you can easily get to the right place.
    1. Cat
      Cat 4 October 2016 14: 04
      +3
      Are you serious?! Security certificates, nutrition?
      The cannons for Bereng's package-bots were cast in Yekaterinburg and Kamensk. History is silent with what labor they and carobelny supplies with weapons were delivered to Okhotsk. That time was spent at least a year is unambiguous, all this is confirmed by documents. The expedition members confirm that every last nail was brought to the Far East from Russia in their memoirs. But that they were moving under guard, on the territory of "Tataria" um ... not a word.
      Damn it, then who are Dzhenev, the Laptev brothers, Khabarov, Otlasov. Why did the Cossacks defend Alabazov. Whom the priests of Verkhoturye and Tobolsk surrounded.
      Do not look for difficult ways, everything is an order of magnitude simpler and more honest.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 5 October 2016 09: 42
        +1
        All Russian geographic expeditions in Asia, Siberia and the Far East until
        the very beginning of the 20th century were guarded by Cossack units.
        1. 2-0
          2-0 5 October 2016 10: 08
          0
          Rather, the Cossacks were part of the expeditions. Those. and "Sherpas" and guards and guides, etc. But, by the way, not all expeditions.
  8. gendir.grifon
    gendir.grifon 4 October 2016 22: 22
    +1
    It is interesting, as we have under the Constitution of the Russian Federation, all subjects are equal, but some subjects (republics) are more equal. Because the republic is a state within the Russian Federation. In my opinion, the political or state independence of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation should be eliminated, it is better for the country to be unitary. The center should tightly control the subjects, especially national ones. Just show them the slack, so the country will also be killed by the occupation of the Russian colonialists.
    1. fanfan tulpan
      fanfan tulpan 15 December 2016 01: 28
      +1
      And please tell me why Tatarstan is ahead of Russia in many sectors? Yes, because the Tatarstan people are getting burned that they have their own republic, and if they take their republic away, everything will collapse overnight and Tatarstan will turn from a donor into a subsidized region. What you need is for everyone to be equal in their desires, or rather, not in their desire to build something, and who will be the donor for other regions eking out a miserable existence. This would be tantamount to killing a chicken laying golden eggs. Everyone knows that all high-profile projects are carried out in Tatarstan. After all, this is not casual, do you think?
  9. Witness 45
    Witness 45 4 October 2016 22: 31
    +2
    Quote: V.ic
    Lots of pictures, but little history. In a local museum, in the mouth of an art guide, it would sound good. A very provocative article. By the way, the troops of Ivan IV included not only Russians, but also Tatars. In the previous era, the Horde "built" Russia, but already in the 16th century the reverse process began.

    As far as it is known, the period immediately before the war between the Moscow kingdom and Kazan, which ended in the capture of Kazan, was relatively peaceful, but then the power in Kazan was seized by representatives of the Crimean Khanate, and the seizure was accompanied by a bloody massacre in which the local ruling elite and its supporters were severely affected. , relations after that between Kazan and Moscow again escalated and led to war, which is why a large number of Tatars entered the army of Ivan the Terrible.
  10. potapych
    potapych 11 October 2016 12: 39
    0
    So that they wouldn’t say it, the occupiers are all the same, (and in general from the Volga to the Pacific Ocean - the Tatar land and the Crimea OUR!) tongue laughing
  11. Jääkorppi
    Jääkorppi 13 October 2016 13: 32
    0
    The Russian and Kazan states were part of the Golden Horde, after the collapse of which internecine wars began, including the Nogai, Crimean and Astrakhan hordes. The ruling elite knew each other and were partly relatives. There was no particular bitterness. You can read about the diplomacy of Moscow princes. The Russians defeated and became heirs to the Horde. As a result, a strong state was formed! But objectively, the war for survival was not in the east, but in the West against the Polish - Lithuanian and Swedish invaders!