Military Review

LAW "Tor-M2" in the current year began to be delivered to the troops

26
Starting from this year, ground forces began to be supplied to the ground forces by the Tor-M2 air defense system, which are capable of conducting reconnaissance of air targets and firing in motion, transmitting RIA News Post commander Oleg Salyukov.


LAW "Tor-M2" in the current year began to be delivered to the troops
TOR-MXNUMU air defense missile system

“This year, the Tor-M2 anti-aircraft missile system began to arrive at the combined-arms formations ... Today it is the only weapon system in its class in the world capable of conducting reconnaissance of airborne targets and shooting in motion”Said the commander in chief.

He also said that the Tor-M2DT complex is being developed in Russia for the Arctic grouping.

“In order to provide air defense in the Arctic zone and the conditions of the Far North, a fully autonomous Tor-M2DT short-range anti-aircraft missile system is being developed, adapted to particularly severe climatic conditions, capable of performing combat missions in extremely low temperatures and difficult rugged terrain ", - said Salukov.
Photos used:
http://militaryarms.ru
26 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimir 38
    Vladimir 38 1 October 2016 10: 59
    +6
    The Arctic zone is very important, the closest way to "partners" Well done!
    1. cniza
      cniza 1 October 2016 12: 14
      +5
      And not only the Arctic and in other zones and regions it will serve us.
      1. Inok10
        Inok10 1 October 2016 12: 56
        +5
        Quote: cniza
        And not only the Arctic and in other zones and regions it will serve us.

        ... everywhere it will serve, where there are Ground Forces ... Ground Forces Air Defense ... by the way, without extra noise and dust, another entertaining contraption is delivered to the troops ... PU-12M7 ... mobile command center for battery management ... in the latest version received its own surveillance radar with a range of up to 160 km. with AFAR ... a target with an EPR of 0,01 m. on the PMV sees for 16 km. with a circular review ... knows how to work in motion ... wink
        1. Kasym
          Kasym 1 October 2016 18: 42
          +1
          Where did the Tunguska go - was it really removed from service? belay Until recently, it was the only air defense system that worked on the move - the Torah only recently "taught" this. hi
          1. Inok10
            Inok10 1 October 2016 21: 54
            +4
            Quote: Kasym
            Where did the Tunguska go - was it really removed from service?

            ... has grown to M1 ... if he sells such a cow, he needs it himself (s) ... bully
            Quote: Kasym
            Until recently, it was the only air defense system that worked on the go.

            ... only cannon armament ... SAM from a short stop ... like the "Pantsir" ... nothing has changed ...
            Quote: Kasym
            The Torah only recently "taught" this.

            ... from birth they were able to ... with "Thor" it is at the genetic level, to work missiles on the go ... hi
          2. sivuch
            sivuch 1 October 2016 22: 39
            0
            They wrote that modernization is underway
        2. sivuch
          sivuch 1 October 2016 22: 39
          0
          So the PRRU-1 in the 80s was able to work shaggy on the move. But here is how the seven is compatible with Barnaul-T. But the range, to put it mildly, is surprising. Neither the Assembly, nor Harmony has such a close range, and why is it at battery level?
          1. Inok10
            Inok10 1 October 2016 23: 35
            +2
            Quote: sivuch
            So PPRU-1 in the 80s shaggy years was able to work in motion.

            ... "Gadfly" was good then ... 20 years ago, when we were young ... hi
            Quote: sivuch
            But here is how the seven is compatible with Barnaul-T.

            ... I think these are links of different chains, more likely here "Rangir" or directly to "Baikal" or "Polyana" ... hi
            Quote: sivuch
            But the range, to put it mildly, is surprising. Neither the Assembly, nor Harmony has such a close range, and why is it at the battery level?

            ... the means of destruction are growing, so are the means of detection ... he himself was surprised ... but also rejoiced ... at TTX screen:
  2. Hunt
    Hunt 1 October 2016 10: 59
    +1
    Good car and good news! I have not heard about the Arctic option, but as they say - in color! The Arctic is OUR !!!
    1. K-50
      K-50 1 October 2016 11: 31
      +1
      Quote: Hunter
      The Arctic is OUR !!!

      Yeah, all of a sudden, the Yankees will come to impose dermocracy on polar bears, and here we are atat-ta-ta. laughing
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 1 October 2016 13: 52
        +1
        You can’t help but understand that almost all air defense in the Arctic is aimed at protecting against sea-based and air-based missile defense?
        They have more than 4000 marine KR alone.
        I doubt that we have so many large air defense missiles, if you take both the S-300 and S-400 together. Therefore, both Tor-M2 with 16 missiles, and Shell-SM is a very, very suitable means of repelling a massive missile strike. For the Arctic - naturally in the Arctic. hi
        1. Lord of the Sith
          Lord of the Sith 1 October 2016 15: 07
          0
          Quote: Alex777
          They have more than 4000 maritime missiles alone. I doubt that we have so many large air defense missiles, if we take both the S-300 and the S-400 together. Therefore, both Tor-M2 with 16 missiles, and Shell-SM is a very, very suitable means of repelling a massive missile strike. For the Arctic - naturally in the Arctic. hi

          Yes, in addition to "S-300" 1900 units "S-300V" 220 units "S-400" 232 units "Tor-M1, Tor-M2" 120 units and "Shell" 152 units, there are others. For example, the day before yesterday there was news about "Osa-AKS" 400 units "Strela-10M" 400 units "Buk-M1, Buk-M2, Buk-M3" 380 units.
        2. DarkMatter
          DarkMatter 1 October 2016 16: 02
          0
          Is Tor-M2 with new missiles, 16 pcs?
          Finally, without any U and so on.
  3. ML-334
    ML-334 1 October 2016 11: 10
    +3
    It's time to break in in Syria with the adoption of security measures.
    1. megavolt823
      megavolt823 1 October 2016 11: 46
      0
      yes for Syria is a very necessary car. erroneous bombing will probably not happen. control of all heights will allow you to dictate. c400 and torus is an application for a non-pilot zone. 5pcs "sky" type and aviation losses are guaranteed. although beech is also a very serious weapon despite its age. but requires a crew. SAM "Tor-M2U enough for a monkey. hi
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 1 October 2016 11: 11
    +3
    A serious and dangerous machine for the enemy. Protection of columns on the march, for attack aircraft and combat helicopters - generally "self-propelled death". In combination with the "Carapaces" it will discourage the desire to "raise the tail" on our ground forces from the air from the "first presentation". Well, and for those who WILL SUPPLY such cars. Do you need such for the Arctic? Apparently, yes. Especially for the outskirts of Murmansk and Chukotka, where tactical aircraft can reach. It is unlikely that aircraft carriers will be able to enter the Arctic, and the Thor ballistic missiles will not be available. Although ... They can, after all, put up a barrier for cruise missiles - and this is precisely its goal! Really? Then there should be more such machines, and in the event of a threat of a strike by Axes from the pole direction, there will be someone to "thin out the enemy flock."
    1. Mikhail Krapivin
      Mikhail Krapivin 1 October 2016 11: 18
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      After all, they can put up a barrier for cruise missiles - and this is precisely its goal! Really? Then there should be more such machines, and in the event of a threat of a strike by Axes from the pole direction, there will be someone to "thin out the enemy flock."


      They can and should. That's just how many hundreds of TOPs need to be stamped, taking into account the number of "axes" around our country ..
      1. megavolt823
        megavolt823 1 October 2016 11: 35
        0
        [/ quote] That's just how many hundreds of TORs need to be stamped, taking into account the number of "axes" around our country. [quote]
        this is decided by axes near their heads. or from the territories of their allies, like the Cuban crisis. or a large number of submarine and surface fleet. tori do not solve this problem. TOP will not allow aiming to hit. for Syrian machine mates 30 will solve many problems. crew training is minimal. hi
      2. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 1 October 2016 11: 44
        +1
        That's just how many hundreds of TOPs need to be stamped, taking into account the number of "axes" around our country ..

        Not on the same TORs is Russian air defense.
  5. Aristide
    Aristide 1 October 2016 11: 30
    +1
    The complex is handsome. One view is credible. Well, business qualities as an addition to the image. Thanks to the developers.
  6. Serebryakov. 75
    Serebryakov. 75 1 October 2016 14: 12
    0
    TECH SPECS
    The tactical and technical characteristics (TTX) of the Tor-M2U complex are indicated below.
    Maximum range of destruction, km
    12
    Minimum damage range, m:
    - at a height of 10 meters
    - at an altitude of more than 100 meters
    1500
    no more 1000
    Number of simultaneously processed goals
    48
    The number of simultaneously tracked targets
    10
    The number of simultaneously fired targets
    4
    Number of simultaneously launched missiles
    8
    Maximum target speed, m / s
    700
    Overloading Maneuver Target
    10 g
    Ammunition for missiles at BM, pcs.
    8 in two missiles
    BM loading time, min.
    18
    Complex deployment time, min.
    3
    BM movement speed, km / h:
    - on highways
    - on dirt roads
    to 80
    to 30
    Cruising range, km
    500
    Maximum BM weight, t
    30
    Calculation of BM, people
    3
    Climatic conditions:
    - temperature, ° С
    - humidity,%
    - height above sea level, m
    - wind speed, m / s
    ±50
    98
    to 3000
    to 30
    1. Eugene-Eugene
      Eugene-Eugene 1 October 2016 17: 56
      0
      These performance characteristics are sideways here. "Tor-2MU" (= "Tor-1M-2U") - the previous version. Drize constantly emphasizes this - do not confuse him with "Tor-M2". See: http://nvo.ng.ru/armament/2016-06-17/6_kupol.html
      1. Serebryakov. 75
        Serebryakov. 75 1 October 2016 19: 09
        0
        The main difference between Tor-M2 and Tor-M1 is the modernization of the target detection station. The upgraded station can detect targets with a small dispersion area (EPR), that is, aircraft created using the stealth technology. In addition, the SOC on Tor-M2 has a higher level of noise immunity than on its predecessor.

        The missile and target tracking radar can accompany four air targets at once and direct six anti-aircraft missiles at them. The design of this radar uses a passive phased array antenna, which has a high degree of protection against electronic interference. It also works in the centimeter wave range. The target tracking system also includes optoelectronic means of tracking airborne objects. They are usually used when the interference level is too high.
        1. Eugene-Eugene
          Eugene-Eugene 1 October 2016 20: 13
          0
          Their main difference - 1) the ability to conduct reconnaissance of air targets and shooting in motion at Thor-M2; 2) 16 missiles instead of 8; 3) SAM itself - 9М338, developed with 93.
        2. sivuch
          sivuch 1 October 2016 22: 43
          0
          As already written here, in Torah-2 without letters the ammunition is doubled to 16 missiles. A new missile was proposed with an IR head, but it’s not yet clear
  7. Cat
    Cat 1 October 2016 16: 30
    0
    God forbid, God forbid ... so that more cars of this class are accepted for service. Good help to the Tunguska.
  8. TOR2
    TOR2 1 October 2016 16: 42
    +2
    the Russian Navy is interested in the possibility of creating a "naval" version of the "Torah" in connection with the need to replace outdated complexes of the "Osa" and "Dagger" type.
    "The concern has worked out this issue and, taking into account the experience of cooperative enterprises in the production and installation of complexes such as" Osa "," Dagger "and others on the ships of the Navy, as well as the possibility of using components for serially produced land samples of the" Tor "air defense missile system, it can be concluded that" naval "version of" Thor "in the shortest possible time (the first samples of the air defense system may appear in 2018-2019), and at minimal cost"


    This development opens up yet another opportunity - the creation on its basis of the ZhDPU. With such installations, it will be possible to strengthen the groups of TOPs protecting critical infrastructure facilities. Automatic delivery of containers with missiles will be most welcome in the case of a massive air raid. To control the missiles launched, we will use the computing power of the fired systems and those left without ammunition at a critical moment.
  9. Ulan
    Ulan 1 October 2016 21: 14
    +1
    More modern weapons for the army, navy, Strategic Missile Forces and Aerospace Forces. It's time to pay off the debts that we owed in the "nineties".
  10. Barakuda
    Barakuda 1 October 2016 22: 31
    0
    Everything was gone .. After OSA-AKM, Hoch.lo.stanovskiy was transferred to BEECH (one of three was riveted, and no one was able to, like me, a dozen remained). I quit. And I want something new. Vivat Russia!