Military Review

The first US lawsuit against Saudi Arabia and the response of Riyadh

83
Information Agency Bloomberg reports that he received the first lawsuit from a US citizen against Saudi Arabia about the involvement of this country in the terrorist attacks of September 11 2001. It is known that the anti-Saud lawsuit was filed by Stephanie Ross Desimon in Washington. This woman 15 years ago lost her husband during a terrorist attack on the Pentagon building.

It should be recalled that during the week the American Congress overcame the presidential veto and in fact authorized the filing of lawsuits by American citizens against Riyadh. This decision is explained by the fact that among the 11 terrorists, September 2001, the largest number are citizens of Saudi Arabia (according to the latest data there were 15 people from 19).

The first US lawsuit against Saudi Arabia and the response of Riyadh


Stephanie Ross Desimon was pregnant in September 2001. Her husband - an officer of the US Navy, was in the building of the main defense department when the plane, controlled by terrorists, fell in the area of ​​one of the links in the Pentagon building.

According to Bloomberg, Desimon is suing Saudi Arabia with a charge of supporting al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden. The amount of claims has not yet been disclosed.

On the eve of Saudi Arabia announced that the decision of the US Congress could have "devastating consequences." According to the Saudi news agency Saudi Press AgencyRiyadh is ready to sell its giant dollar assets, as they can now be frozen by the decision of the American courts.
Photos used:
dic.academic.ru
83 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ingvar 72
    Ingvar 72 1 October 2016 07: 47
    +28
    On the eve of Saudi Arabia announced that the decision of the American Congress could have "devastating consequences."
    Ha, scared the goat with cabbage! There will be no consequences. The CA is completely dependent on the United States, and cannot do anything. And the United States simply decided to slightly dispossess its vassal, like the guardsman of Ivan the Terrible, or Peter's seizures from the church.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Comrade Schucher
        Comrade Schucher 1 October 2016 07: 58
        +12
        And it’s true that the Saudis went on strike, it turns out: they messed up with the Merikos, so to speak, and to answer the Arabs, and even before the people of their accomplice.
        1. hrych
          hrych 1 October 2016 09: 28
          +13
          Enormous Saudi assets in the United States will be arrested to secure claims, and no one will sell them, this is the main feature of this law. Now why the elite split. Democrats are globalists, bankers, and republicans themselves are oilmen and industrialists. They shared power with each other in turn, and looted other countries together. Now, without Saudis, there is no dollar, or rather black gold, which is behind it and the cheapest light oil, so the Republicans are merging the World Order. In short, in order to keep it, one must fight, one must lower the price of oil at a loss, etc. at a loss to its oil industry. Republicans can be understood Saud is the last of his sons, light oil is over, production seizes the Asia-Pacific region, blacks rebel. They are losing the United States as a country, and bankers do not care to move to China, etc. This is the split.
          1. hrych
            hrych 1 October 2016 09: 41
            +9
            The Republicans finally decided to privatize the Saudi inheritance, in the US economy, as the Europeans robbed Libya, only a thousand times worse. The mode is drained. The reason for the Russian Federation, in the fields of Syria they did not give two pipes to the EU, oil from Iran and gas from Qatar, all long-term plans collapsed, Iran did not care, he would lay one jester in Indochina with a pipe. And the Russian Federation transfers oil trading in national currencies. Those. bankers' plans failed or need to fight with the Russian Federation, but nothing. The bankers wanted to unleash a world war and sit out in latamerica, and the Republicans didn’t really need it. I feel that there will be a pogrom of bankers, he is also a world kagal, and the new USA will be on our side. There will be a new world outcome, or rather, the arrival in Palestine. There, this ethnos will try to survive already from the global pogrom, under the authority of the leader about whom there were prophecies ... Mystic has found a real outline.
            1. hrych
              hrych 1 October 2016 09: 51
              +12
              Trump was an impassable jester, but the Gods hit the old woman, he is talking about peace with the Russian Federation, bankers about the war and this is no longer an election circus, it's true. The main thing is on whose side is the pentagon, I think it is a republican ... But that USA will never be. Immediately in the EU they talk about the European army, because NATO, the punitive army of the New Order, was created allegedly against the USSR, which they created and utilized by the undeveloped descendants of the Trotskyists leaving one hegemon (Stalin spoiled their plans, but not for long). Those. A new reorganization of the World is being prepared. I like that in it the Russian Federation is the strongest without a big war, and you say the mace flies badly ...
            2. just exp
              just exp 1 October 2016 12: 49
              +1
              Well, if about the prophecies, then Russia will still fight with the states, and with the Turks as well.
              but it is possible that the prophecies are a little mistaken.
              and bankers are likely to sit in Latin America, because in Israel and Europe they are very angry now.
    2. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog 1 October 2016 07: 52
      0
      There will still be roofing felts) right now, suits like mushrooms will climb after the rain)
      1. just exp
        just exp 1 October 2016 12: 43
        +2
        lawsuits will be exactly as many as needed, no more and no less.
        cause
        Riyadh is ready to go on the sale of its gigantic dollar assets, as they can now be frozen by the decision of American courts.

        that is, the states want to freeze their debts, then generally write them off.
        Saudis go to feed.
    3. The black
      The black 1 October 2016 07: 52
      +23
      The monkeys could not do anything, others did for him. And what will the Saudis do now? Begin to bite the owner's leg? Small children, good luck to them laughing but the main thing is PRECEDENT!
      Next in line are lawsuits against the United States from the families of 200 Iraqis destroyed by the military states during the invasion of Iraq. And then other countries, according to the list. There are many of them who have benefited from the "democratic" bombing. This is exactly what Obama was afraid of, and therefore vetoed this law (since there is case law in the United States).
      1. Hunt
        Hunt 1 October 2016 08: 16
        +29
        Good morning! I'm afraid you do not quite correctly understand the US judicial system. Claims of the Iraqi victims and no one, not US citizens, will not be accepted by more than one Amer court! The exceptional in their courts protect only their citizens, and punish everyone else, for the sake of their miracle country. American justice was created only to rob other countries, as well as their entire foreign policy!
        1. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 1 October 2016 08: 20
          +4
          Quote: Hunter
          Claims of the affected Iraqis and anyone else, not US citizens, not one Amer court will accept

          Exactly! For what is permitted to Jupiter is not allowed to the bull. hi
        2. Reptiloid
          Reptiloid 1 October 2016 08: 23
          +2
          It’s interesting, because if black admitted a mistake - compensate! !!!!
          It was NECESSARY for the Iraqis to go to court immediately, and now another president will call the monkey a mistake
          1. katalonec2014
            katalonec2014 1 October 2016 08: 59
            +4
            Quote: Reptiloid
            Interestingly, if black admitted a mistake

            He did not admit anything, this Congress voted against the decision of the president.
            The hunter is right, the bill is aimed at robbing a vassal, and the Iraqis will not need to smell there.
        3. ZuuT
          ZuuT 1 October 2016 09: 01
          +3
          Claims of the Iraqi victims and no one, not US citizens, will not be accepted by more than one Amer court! Exceptional in their courts protect only their citizens
          Indeed, we can talk about current American citizens and current with respect to SA
        4. Strength
          Strength 1 October 2016 09: 15
          +4
          It is precisely that the US courts protect their citizens, and in Russia they would spit on their citizens, so as not to spoil the attitude.
        5. The black
          The black 1 October 2016 09: 17
          +4
          Good morning! I'm afraid you do not quite correctly understand the US judicial system. Claims of the Iraqi victims and no one, not US citizens, will not be accepted by more than one Amer court! The exceptional in their courts protect only their citizens, and punish everyone else, for the sake of their miracle country. American justice was created only to rob other countries, as well as their entire foreign policy!
          You are definitely right. But I wrote
          The next in line lawsuits against the United States
          ... That is, they will apply to international courts. And if the lawsuit in the US itself "rolls", then this will be a precedent that will be taken into account by the IC ... Although, I am aware that the decision of the IC in the United States is not binding, but still. ..............
        6. just exp
          just exp 1 October 2016 12: 52
          +2
          but there is already a precedent, and if the states beat the lawsuits of citizens of other countries (but it doesn’t work out, and that’s why the Abama began to bleat that now the states will also be responsible), you can start to vote that the states are the wrong state to slaughter justice.
      2. SPACE
        SPACE 1 October 2016 09: 11
        +3
        Quote: Black
        Obama, therefore, vetoed this law

        In this case, the fact of overcoming the veto is interesting. Obama does not determine politics personally, he represents, let’s say, the interests of a certain group of influential people, but Congress, the people represented in it, also have no less weight and have their own common interests. One way or another, overcoming the veto, clearly showed a conflict of interest, groups of very serious people in America, the State Department and Congress, which firstly at least proves the heterogeneity of the elite, and the maximum confrontation, and secondly the lack of power of the ruling elite of the United States. In this case, it is interesting to observe the consequences, especially considering the comprehensive communications and globalization, as it comes to mind in the remote corners of the planet. Of course, one can fantasize and assume that the State Department could not fulfill the promises of the eryad, which the opponents of the State Department may have decided to break up because they did not fulfill the task in Syria, because Putin does not order in the Kremlin. Who knows? Perhaps there is a scrapping or a reorientation of American politics and the rearrangement of vassals, the economy is crushing, maybe a democratic spring is shining for the Saudis, yet support for terrorists at the state level is fraught with some too much excitement in the media, it’s time to clean up. But, it is doubtful that the appointed absolution will sit still, maybe they will also run to Putin, we must observe))). Of course, we can assume that this is a theatrical performance such as an evil bad cop, but then it looks like a clumsy one. And also the price of oil and gas, Turkey, China, Europe and elections on the nose))), no, popcorn is clearly necessary))).
      3. corporal
        corporal 1 October 2016 09: 56
        +1
        Quote: Black
        but the main thing is PRECEDENT!

        And since they have case law, then .... we stock up on popcorn and watch the circus.
    4. vovanpain
      vovanpain 1 October 2016 08: 33
      +14
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      The CA is completely dependent on the United States, and cannot do anything.

      Good morning, dear colleagues! But in March of this year, Congress passed this law already, then the Saudis promised to throw 750 lard on the Amer’s asset market and Monkey instantly put in his pants and a veto, as it will now. request For me, let them butt. Less resources will go to support different barmaleys. Yes
    5. K-50
      K-50 1 October 2016 08: 51
      +5
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      Ha, scared the goat with cabbage! There will be no consequences. CA is completely dependent on the United States, and can not do anything

      Not quite true, that is, not at all true. In America, the so-called case law applies. That is, if some court made some rather meaningless decision, then other courts can take similar ones on the basis of this precedent.
      Now we look like this. If the court recognizes the right of Americans to compensation for moral and material damage during the terrorist attacks, and the defendants are the countries whose citizens were terrorists. Both other countries, as well as their citizens, can sue America for damages to their health, property, loss of a breadwinner, and other damage caused by the US armed forces. And American courts will no longer be able to dismiss such claims, since the precedent is CREATED by the United States. If you take into account how many mattress mattresses heaped up all over the world (they destroyed people without declaring war, destroyed material property and other indecency), then it becomes very clear that the most drastic democratic mattress awaits in lawsuits. hi
      1. zoolu300
        zoolu300 1 October 2016 18: 26
        0
        Those are right who say that overcoming the veto is only in order to dispossess the slave (Saudi Arabia). Everything will depend on the behavior of the sheikhs. They will be "crushed" at attention, get off with only a small amount (in billions) of cut green paper. They will start to "excite" at the owners of the Federal Reserve System, and they will immediately remember what they did not notice before point-blank (they will completely de-democratize them). And the claims of citizens of other countries to the fairest judicial system in the world on the basis of case law, the owners of the FRS will turn on the reproductive organ.
    6. 2s1122
      2s1122 1 October 2016 09: 10
      0
      Confuse Ivan the Terrible and Peter | with amerikosami, one country was strengthened and these mess around to the fullest everywhere hi
    7. Sotskiy
      Sotskiy 1 October 2016 09: 25
      0
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      Ha, scared the goat with cabbage! There will be no consequences. CA is completely dependent on the United States, and can not do anything

      Yes, the joke is not in this, but in the fact that according to the same law passed by Congress, you can bring claims against the United States itself. This is the "devastating effect". laughing This is a clue. And "suffered" from the United States oh, how much! If the US floods with claims, the US may not emerge from such a swamp hi
    8. The black
      The black 1 October 2016 09: 29
      0
      Here's the deal. It is clear that the US Saudis will practically not do anything, because they know that an otvetka may come. You just have to unleash the "free press" and various "human rights organizations" and the medieval royal family are waiting for their Maidan. BUT !!!!! CA is the main supplier of oil in the United States, to arrange a "Maidan" there means to lose a source of cheap oil for an indefinite time ...
      1. Lelek
        Lelek 1 October 2016 11: 59
        +4
        Quote: Black
        to arrange a "maidan" there means to lose a source of cheap oil for an indefinite time ...


        This is nothing compared to eliminating the main competitor for the supply of oil to the world market. For Americans, this is the ultimate dream, manna from heaven, especially since the reason to strangle a beloved competitor is more than suitable. Kidalovo is a favorite pastime of bigwigs from an "exclusive country". Moreover, the Saudis' oil holdings are placed in US banks.
    9. figwam
      figwam 1 October 2016 09: 33
      +1
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      On the eve of Saudi Arabia announced that the decision of the American Congress could have "devastating consequences."
      Ha, scared the goat with cabbage! There will be no consequences. The CA is completely dependent on the United States, and cannot do anything. And the United States simply decided to slightly dispossess its vassal, like the guardsman of Ivan the Terrible, or Peter's seizures from the church.

      Look who breaks his back before whom?
    10. Alexdark
      Alexdark 1 October 2016 20: 00
      0
      Here it is debatable which of them r0ptk and cabbage. Need to look deeper. The USA has the largest debt to the CA. That is, we can say that the CA is her daddy. In general, clever, clever. No need to become a powerful power, you can sponsor another, make power out of it. Feed the protein of your guard hired. And no one will look at you in the case of hour H. It is much more competent, safer than making a powerful empire out of your state.
  2. AleksPol
    AleksPol 1 October 2016 07: 52
    +2
    It started. And if China starts selling its assets
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 1 October 2016 08: 25
      +4
      Quote: AleksPol
      And if China starts selling its assets

      Will not start. If he just twitches, he will fall under the sanctions of the West, and on any far-fetched occasion. And Western sanctions for China mean the collapse of the economy, because it is more than two-thirds oriented to export to the west. And in China they know it. So China will sit by the river, waiting until the enemy’s corpse swims. At the same time building up the army and gold reserves. hi
      1. FREGATEN
        FREGATEN 1 October 2016 08: 55
        +6
        Oh, oh? .... The collapse of the PRC economy immediately entails the death of the Western model of the economy .. and maybe not only the economy ..... It's just .. the simplest example .... 100% of iPhones by any of our liberals and golden youth .. .it is collected in China ..... and many, many, many .....
    2. Lelek
      Lelek 1 October 2016 12: 07
      +1
      Quote: AleksPol
      And if China starts selling its assets


      With what fright? As long as the production facilities of the United States are located in the "celestial" territory, there will be no gestures to dump the dollar mass from China. The Chinese clearly respect their interests (monkey on a rock ...).
  3. woron333444
    woron333444 1 October 2016 07: 55
    +2
    Either they will slow down and no one will win, or they will lose an ally in the Middle East. In addition to assets held in the USA, there are also bases from which they can be asked.
    1. 2s1122
      2s1122 1 October 2016 09: 14
      +2
      most likely it will be, scammers like two camels in the sea laughing such a pun
  4. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 1 October 2016 07: 57
    +3
    Only puppets, Saudis filed the wrong claim, and the owners and the main terrorists are just the United States! The claims must fall precisely on the General Prosecutor of the United States against the State Department, the Pentagon, the army, the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, the Senate, the Congress. And others, among other things ...
  5. with
    with 1 October 2016 07: 57
    +1

    The terrorists will sue the United States for failing to secure their "rights" and treaties. Only their trial is "uncivilized". The Saudis can still bring a lot of trouble to the "Bulwark of Democracy". Even if their state is merged. No one is immune from fanatics.
  6. Barakuda
    Barakuda 1 October 2016 07: 57
    +11
    But the plane crashed into the Pentagon, so plainly did not find. As for me - they fucked a cruise missile. Maybe a lawsuit should be filed with the US government? request
  7. mamont5
    mamont5 1 October 2016 07: 58
    +1
    Well, here's another scandal in the "noble" family ...
    1. 2s1122
      2s1122 1 October 2016 09: 20
      0
      where did you see this family noble, didn’t notice that you allocated them clearly.
    2. Lelek
      Lelek 1 October 2016 12: 10
      0
      Quote: mamont5
      Well, here's another scandal in the "noble" family ...


      Yes, you, they’ll break a couple of pots and kiss.
  8. VP
    VP 1 October 2016 08: 01
    0
    The first one went.
  9. PKK
    PKK 1 October 2016 08: 06
    +8
    The traces of the wings are not visible in the photo, and the wings themselves would have remained outside. Obama started a dangerous game, it turned out that the twins collapsed from the explosion of termite blocks in the basement and successive explosions along the height of the buildings. And the fact that the third building collapsed next to which nothing not hit, apparently not reached.
    Saudis can sue for defamation.
  10. Barakuda
    Barakuda 1 October 2016 08: 07
    +9
    With such success, Russian citizens can sue the Saudis for Chechnya. Ubyu.dkov who sponsored? If urns stood near mosques, to help the Chechen brothers. am And try not to drop 20 tanks ... I saw this in Riyadh ..
  11. Vyacheslav73
    Vyacheslav73 1 October 2016 08: 07
    0
    Apparently turning on the machine is already becoming an overhead ... they squeezed out a few billions from the French, Deutsche Bank is next, and now they will start cutting coupons from other vassals. In general, from all those who cannot say anything in response ... The time will come paybacks for the Americans too ... We stock up on popcorn and - "we'll have a look" laughing
  12. OLD FART
    OLD FART 1 October 2016 08: 15
    +4
    Ordinary distracting maneuver, before the election .... Pole and calm down!
    1. katalonec2014
      katalonec2014 1 October 2016 09: 02
      0
      Quote: STARPER
      Ordinary Distraction

      Hi Vital, but Madame may slip through.
  13. Neophyte
    Neophyte 1 October 2016 08: 15
    +2
    Interestingly, Russia will have claims against the United States in our courts? Hardly strong
    the power of dollar oligarchs and they do not need such tricks!
  14. vvdan_vo
    vvdan_vo 1 October 2016 08: 22
    +5
    A cruise missile flew into the pentagon. A lawsuit against your own government should be filed. Empire of lies and money ...
  15. vlad.svargin
    vlad.svargin 1 October 2016 08: 24
    +1
    Wrong claims, lawsuits must be filed to the top of the United States. Most likely it will be so when the story opens slightly as they don’t hide the ends ...
  16. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 1 October 2016 08: 26
    +1
    Quote: Hunter
    American justice was created only to rob other countries, as well as their entire foreign policy!

    I will support you. You can't intimidate us with the US courts. They have their own more prosperous and "fair" court for each court.
    Regarding the sale of assets, it is unlikely. For too long, Americans have been covering Saudi freaks on the BV.
  17. Observer2014
    Observer2014 1 October 2016 08: 28
    +3
    And I won’t comment on anything. I will silently enjoy the show. And everything is clear to everyone except the SA and US citizens bully
  18. ochakow703
    ochakow703 1 October 2016 08: 29
    0
    Lovely scolding, only amuse. Together they brewed this bloody mess, and now they are trying to find the switchman. Flag in hand.
  19. win
    win 1 October 2016 08: 35
    +3
    In America, if a wife does not fulfill her marital duty, then the husband can file a lawsuit against her court and the debt will be executed by a bailiff in a judicial proceeding
    1. Mikhail Krapivin
      Mikhail Krapivin 1 October 2016 08: 46
      +1
      :) Colleague, you gave an excellent example of the work of the American judicial system. In the nineties, ours fled to Matrasia using fictitious marriages, and American courts allowed agents of the relevant services to break into the houses of the suspects at night, in order to verify whether they are actually fulfilling a conjugal duty or if the marriage of an American citizen is fictitious :)
  20. Polite Moose
    Polite Moose 1 October 2016 08: 39
    0
    during the week, the U.S. Congress overcame the presidential veto and actually authorized the filing of lawsuits by American citizens against Riyadh.

    As the saying goes: "Kum, not godfather, but get off the cherries." An object lesson to all existing and potential allies of the n-owls. As soon as the snout was led in the wrong direction - everything. Love is over.
    Although, I have a suspicion that all these gestures are a yoke to the public, and that the new p-cu president will turn everything back. And the friendship of the Saudis and P-owls will erupt with renewed vigor.
  21. Delink
    Delink 1 October 2016 08: 47
    +2
    According to the Saudi news agency Saudi Press Agency, Riyadh is ready to go on sale of its gigantic dollar assets, as they can now be frozen by the decision of American courts.

    Apparently it's time to stock up on popcorn. We will see a fall in the dollar.
    1. OLD FART
      OLD FART 1 October 2016 09: 08
      0
      Quote: Delink
      According to the Saudi news agency Saudi Press Agency, Riyadh is ready to go on sale of its gigantic dollar assets, as they can now be frozen by the decision of American courts.

      Apparently it's time to stock up on popcorn. We will see a fall in the dollar.

      Think ..? But I doubt it ... It's after all one gang of robbers!
      Although today the yuan has officially become the world reserve currency .... Compensation will be paid in RMB ...))))
      1. megavolt823
        megavolt823 1 October 2016 12: 06
        0
        I think this is a demonstration. if your citizens create sabotage groups and attack, then you answer . that's what i see. and the rest are engaged in strabismus. hi here are the next (tsarnaev) found corpses. and under them a statue (women with a spark) will be blown up and will yell to judge Russia. hi and you are Saudis, camels.
  22. fif21
    fif21 1 October 2016 09: 30
    +1
    The Saudis also keep money outside the country, the United States will freeze their assets and saw off from them as much as required. And where will the drovers of camels run to complain? A visual lesson for those who pray for the US dollar. hi
  23. Magda tobicka
    Magda tobicka 1 October 2016 09: 43
    0
    [media = http: //www.dailymotion.com/video/x4uduk4_g
    arniak_people]
  24. Magda tobicka
    Magda tobicka 1 October 2016 09: 44
    0
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4uduk4_garniak_
    people]
  25. Magda tobicka
    Magda tobicka 1 October 2016 09: 44
    0
    [quote = Magda Tobicka] http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4uduk4_garniak_
    people
  26. Magda tobicka
    Magda tobicka 1 October 2016 09: 45
    +1
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4uduk4_garniak_
    people
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. Evil 55
    Evil 55 1 October 2016 11: 22
    0
    Flames ignite from the spark and the Saudis drop their masks, showing the guise of a true sponsor of terrorism ..
  29. Rostislav
    Rostislav 1 October 2016 11: 39
    0
    Very "meaningful". And how did the Saudis respond?
    A new tendency began to appear on VO, previously inherent only in the yellow press - a catchy title and a "dummy" in the content of the article.
    Sad.
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. SeregaBoss
    SeregaBoss 1 October 2016 12: 46
    0
    Yes, there will be nothing to the Saudis, a talking head will come out and say:
    The decision of the Amer court is not legitimate and put it in your exclusive chocolate shop! So that is all.
  32. zenith
    zenith 1 October 2016 12: 52
    0
    Quote: Polite Moose
    during the week, the U.S. Congress overcame the presidential veto and actually authorized the filing of lawsuits by American citizens against Riyadh.

    As the saying goes: "Kum, not godfather, but get off the cherries." An object lesson to all existing and potential allies of the n-owls. As soon as the snout was led in the wrong direction - everything. Love is over.
    Although, I have a suspicion that all these gestures are a yoke to the public, and that the new p-cu president will turn everything back. And the friendship of the Saudis and P-owls will erupt with renewed vigor.


    Namely, they will scold and fall in love again. 2 jackals and howl they have in common. I liked the name (p-owls), quite natural. At VO, everything is misinterpreted in a different language: mericos, merikatos, Americans, amerikosy. Question. And who assigned them (these areas are states in part of North America) to the name AMERICA? America is the name of the continent. Why Algerians do not rename themselves jur. called Africans. Well, we already know tseyevropu. It was the sshans that were self-appointed or what they appropriated to themselves the name of the continent - America. But is it not worth the states of South America to sue the sshants for naming that does not belong to them?
  33. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 1 October 2016 13: 30
    0
    Class! Now, according to the decision of the American courts, the money on the claims will be withdrawn without acceptance from the accounts of the SA, and if the Saudis begin to "twitch" and do something with them, they will simply be "frozen" so as not to interfere with derbanization! Well, liberals and thieves? Where will you hide the stolen goods? There are no other places in the world where it would be safe!
  34. Leonid Har
    Leonid Har 1 October 2016 13: 33
    0
    So what is it that any citizen of Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq can sue the USA for the damage caused and demand moral and material compensation for the bombed house and the loss of their loved ones? Good incident. Need to rock the boat.
  35. CooL_SnipeR
    CooL_SnipeR 1 October 2016 14: 45
    +1
    Yes, any person who does not have dementia knows that a cruise missile was launched into the Pentagon.
  36. mark021105
    mark021105 1 October 2016 17: 03
    +1
    Let the Saudis demand to present, as evidence, the wreckage of the plane, which according to the investigation crashed into the Pentagon ...
  37. Weniamin
    Weniamin 1 October 2016 17: 05
    +1
    hrych,
    Dear, you write so beautifully - you would read so.
  38. Operator
    Operator 1 October 2016 18: 46
    0
    A powerful blow to US-Saudi cooperation: Americans hold numerous military bases in the Kingdom, and Saudis in the States 750 billion dollar assets

    The Saudis (who financed the 2001 terrorist attack of the year) have only one option - to withdraw their assets in yuan (one of the IMF reserve currencies from today) or in rubles, and also replace US bases with Chinese or Russian.
  39. Alex20042004
    Alex20042004 1 October 2016 19: 17
    0
    The mattresses fully believed in their exclusivity.
  40. Hitrovan07
    Hitrovan07 1 October 2016 19: 27
    +1
    hrych,
    Thumbs up
  41. Erg
    Erg 2 October 2016 09: 35
    +2
    We are waiting for lawsuits from the Americans to "their" country. This clownery with Arab terrorists amuses.
  42. Kudrevkn
    Kudrevkn 2 October 2016 10: 21
    +1
    Well done! He laid it out on shelves without half a liter, like a half liter, but .... And where is China?
  43. Real stalinist
    Real stalinist 2 October 2016 17: 52
    0
    Well, it’s about to start ... The World Championship in sending plaintiffs from one side and the other - Arabs also have something to present to mattresses. And since no one will even consider these claims ...
  44. igor.borov775
    igor.borov775 3 October 2016 03: 52
    0
    Hello!! I read that they wrote and was upset for all of us. With what a fright the US will pay money for foreign claims. First, remember the many international Protocols and Conventions the US has signed. They are not stupid as you think. During his presidency, Obama did what the United States has long sought. They took invisible control of all the largest banks in Europe and on other continents you can only guess .. The exception is China. There is tight state control. Only that Deutsche Bank was forgiven and he pays a small fine. Here is the policy. Frau Merkel supports the United States in putting pressure on us. And before that, France was also threatened with a big bet. The Bank could have been fined. The President of France saved the Bank of Mistral did not give. Not him. This amendment was accepted by the Bankers on time. Now even more arrogance will appear on the international financial market. The United States will reap even harder. And the main dollar should be one task. They will not back down. This is the main core of politics. You can, to the point of insanity, expect the United States to suffer inconvenience and financial losses. Not those attacked. Regards to everyone on the site.
  45. DimerVladimer
    DimerVladimer 3 October 2016 08: 28
    +1
    Americans love to sue - and the American court is usually on the American side in disputes.
  46. bazilio
    bazilio 3 October 2016 13: 14
    +1
    Very interesting news, extremely interesting!
    Where will the lawsuits be filed? What collision bindings will be used? and most importantly, to which branch of law should disputes be related to these claims? to private international law, apparently, but there is a discrepancy (one of many) - the state may be the subject of a private emergency, but only the state of the SA and its state bodies had no relation to terrorist attacks, otherwise it’s casus beli and then we’re talking about IHL ... it’s sooooo interesting to look at all this ...
  47. atakan
    atakan 3 October 2016 14: 39
    0
    HARAZA,
    What a delicious lawsuit !!!!!
    Even stupid people know that in this case a cruise missile flew in!
    No wheels, no engines, no seats, no suitcases, Where are the corpses ??!
    I'm not talking about those in the office of the anti-terror.
    And yet, yes, I categorically insist that the lawsuit will be successful!
    and they’ll pay it from the special CIA fund, but the Jews will defer as always.
  48. atakan
    atakan 3 October 2016 17: 32
    0


    Yes and there’s not even an opportunity to hide evidence
    - clumsy work, designed for a suppressed voiceless mass, diluted by lawyers.
  49. dep071
    dep071 4 October 2016 15: 20
    0
    This decision is explained by the fact that among the terrorists on September 11, 2001 the largest number are citizens of Saudi Arabia (according to the latest data, there were 15 of 19 people)


    1.And who proved it? What is a similar appearance or passport identified? Well, everything is clear DNA.
    Again, the states need a reason for something global, they will come up with something bloody and spectacular, such as houses falling from top to bottom and convincing everyone of this, there are plenty of sheep and we have plenty of them.
    2. Well, I wonder why it was precisely in this building that a flying saucer crashed (see the photo in the header or above my post) or something else flying, well, like BGM-109 Tomahawk. Probably there was a repair.

    In general, all this is empty. In Moscow, houses were also undermined. And to whom to bring claims?
  50. Dynamic systems
    Dynamic systems 7 October 2016 07: 49
    0
    Look at the picture carefully .... no traces (parts) of the aircraft.