The new concept of the US Marine Corps: to learn to fight with a "technologically strong adversary"

The command of the Marine Corps has developed a new concept for its troops, in which the emphasis is on a war with a “technologically strong adversary” rather than with “poorly trained and poorly armed insurgents,” reports Look with reference to USNI News.

“Do we need to fix something (in the old concept from 2014 d)? We were crushed? No, but we constantly fought with the rebels, we were trained, equipped and organized in such a way as to oppose them, ”says the publication of the words of commandant of the Marine Corps, General Robert Neller.

“The rebels (in Iraq and Afghanistan) were courageous and courageous, but that’s where their opportunities were exhausted,” he said.

“The rebels had no means of electronic warfare. They had no air force. They did not have the ability to effectively shoot from closed positions. They could not bring down our networks or drown out our signals. They did not have maneuverable armored units. They did not come up with complicated plans that could be misleading our troops ", - listed Neller.

According to him, the new concept provides for the transition "to a maneuvering war through a combination of the use of various weapons, covering five different environments - air, land, sea, space and cyberspace."

Great importance is given to the information war. "If you can destroy the enemy, it is good, but it is better to defeat the enemy without a fight," the general noted.

He highlighted several important components of the concept, such as “integrating the capabilities of the Navy and the Marine Corps (ILC), developing the very structure of the expeditionary combined-arms units of the USMC, and improving the maneuverability of the“ small and large units — infantry and support forces — in different landscapes along with logistics support operations. "

In addition, according to Neller, it is necessary to pay attention to the training of the ILC fighters and review the requirements for candidates for service in the marines.

Comments

[cniza]

The United States and the West will never understand that fighting for lies and hypocrisy is a deliberate loss to those who are fighting for justice and truth.

[dmi.pris1]

So in any case, they are sure that they are fighting for justice and truth ... As in Vietnam, for example. And ... ppppp.

[Samoyed]

Not certainly in that way. Many burned summons, staged demonstrations. Especially a few years after the start. In the US, there are a lot of normal, not puppet, money bags.

[Ivan Ivanov]

Quote: cniza

The USA and the West will never understand what to fight for lies and hypocrisy

The Yankees in the world as a gopnik a recidivist in kindergarten, there are no categories of lies and hypocrisy for them, the question is whether the towers understand this. confession of powders and numerous ceasefires with the same result are very confusing.

[Observer2014]

“The rebels did not have electronic warfare. They had no air force. They did not have the ability to effectively shoot from closed positions. They could not bring down our networks or drown out our signals. They did not have maneuvering armored units. They did not come up with complex plans that could mislead our troops. ”

I'd like to add: They had no weapons capable of erasing all life on Earth in a matter of minutes.

[GSH-18]

Quote: cniza

The United States and the West will never understand that fighting for lies and hypocrisy is a deliberate loss to those who are fighting for justice and truth.

But they don’t need to understand this yet. They are a technologically advanced power, their dollar is the world currency, and in the appendage, they are the only country with a Eurovasse military bloc. Enough to hold the whole world for a soft spot.

[hrych]

But they passed the anti-Saudi law, immediately OPEC agreed to reduce oil production, which means that the Fed is no longer in price dumping, the dollar is in danger, so Prezik could not hold Congress, the victory of the lobby is internal, over the globalists. There has never been such a split in the elites. The USSR also collapsed ...

[Alex_Rarog]

Learn the point if the troops have 0 motivation !!! about losses at 5 percent, they lose any mood and with losses at 10 already in a panic))))

[ddd1975]

... do not underestimate the enemy, especially since such as the states. Their main weapon is the dollar, and they are fighting with the wrong hands. They only finish it on their own ... FALSE is their main ally - to make the enemy doubt the truth ... So, it's not so simple ...

[fzr1000]

Tell it to the Japanese.

[Mikhail3]

Which we crushed, and the atomic bomb finished off. And so the Japanese lost the islands, and aliens. And that’s all.

[Hunt]

Here are those on! Have you learned to drive the Papuans? Well, the American Marines will not fight somewhere on a land unknown to them, and even with a strong enemy, which concepts do not develop!

[gringo]

"In addition, according to Neller, it is necessary to pay attention to the training of the ILC fighters and revise the requirements for candidates for service in the Marine Corps" along the way, they will stop taking women and pi ... s and Mexicans and Americans in the first generation. ...

[aszzz888]

No, but we constantly fought with the rebels,

Yeah, with the help of aircraft carriers, tomahawks, etc. The mericatos succeeded in this!

[PKK]

An interesting turn, the Americans refuse to run long distances, justifying the fact that there are a lot of helicopters and why to fly if you can fly. But now it’s dangerous to fly, they can shoot down, you have to run and get the most out of it.

[bouncyhunter]

Quote: Alex_Rarog

Learn the point if the troops have 0 motivation !!! about losses at 5 percent, they lose any mood and with losses at 10 already in a panic))))

And, according to the acknowledgment of the mattress generals themselves, they can fight (with a technologically powerful opponent) (can they?) Only with 10-fold superiority. Pissing skunks!

[KaPToC]

It is not a matter of reference, this is the nature of things; representatives of one nation are stronger than representatives of another for natural reasons. The more favorable the climate, the weaker the people.

[Taygerus]

they can’t defeat the Holozady popuas, but here the warriors waved, let the sailors from Donald Cook ask for advice they will advise them on how to fight with a technologically powerful opponent

[win]

Somewhere on a mountain road are the US Marines. The paratrooper Boris jumps to the top of the hill and shouts:
- Hey girls! Can you handle me five?
The American captain with a grin accepts the challenge and sends five soldiers to the hill. The fight begins, and in the course of the struggle the group hides behind a hillock. After a couple of minutes, the screams subside, and here on the top of the hill our smiling paratrooper appears again:
- Yes, where are you five of you ... ten of you will overcome one, nipples.
The captain became furious and sends ten people to the hill to deal with the Russian. Again the battle, again hiding behind the hill, screams, blows. After 5 minutes, the Russian with a laugh is drawn again on the hill:
- Hahah, girls, you’re quite frail. Commander, come on everyone here!
The Marine Sergeant, furious, sends the whole platoon into the fray, the group has again disappeared. Screams, smoke, clatter of knives. Two minutes later, a bloodied soldier crawls out on the edge of the hill with a cry:
- Kapitaaaaan, this is an ambush !!! Them there TWO!

[voyaka uh]

Calm yourself. A lot of Latinos go to marines: all kinds of mixtures
Indians, Métis, Spaniards.
They master the modern weapon with difficulty but melee, especially
so that with a dagger and cut - a sweet deal. All criminal cases in Iraq when
they "took revenge" on the locals for their killed comrades - on the Latinos.
So the brave Boris is likely to be cut off by a machete .

[newcomer]

we’ll see who cuts someone down. and according to the article: a hint transparent. only then I knew it, preparing a war with us.

[newcomer]

I’m very afraid to turn out to be wrong, in my memory, I know the story more or less decently, hand-to-hand combat, a lash attack, this is the hobby of our army. I’m afraid and I don’t remember when we lost hand-to-hand combat to the enemy.

[2s1122]

I'm afraid that there is no longer that grip of bayonet fighting, they’re not being trained as before

[newcomer]

but when our warrior goes on the attack, the genes of grandfathers and fathers will wake up in him and his hands will remember their skills at once. our fighting spirit, soldier ingenuity and a sense of shoulder comrade_2/3 victory, the rest is a matter of flying or sergeant: to nod, teach, train, and most importantly to set an example. these are our commanders, unlike some, they can.

[The brightest]

Quote: voyaka uh

Calm yourself.

Seriously? Zionist fascist, who are you scaring with a knife and hand-to-hand fighting ... We nailed the sewing on the gates of Constantinople, when you anointed the synagogues with experiments.

[gringo]

Well, actually, the kingdom of Judah was destroyed by the Romans before the birth of Christ, so you got excited about the nailed shield. and by the way, the Jews were already good soldiers (they created many problems for the invincible legions), for which they paid for the complete destruction of the state.
Therefore, they see that in the future they fight only with the support of hegemons (they still see the genetic memory, they are again afraid to grab it ...)

[Strength]

If you imagine and imagine a war between Russia and the United States, without using nuclear weapons, I’m not sure that all Russians will fight for Russia with such a government and will not go over to the side of the United States. Well, if only vodka will fall in price not up to 100 rubles, but up to 10.

[Tihas]

Who put a child on the Internet?
Russians are fighting for their homeland, not for the government.

[Strength]

How amusing you are. Do you live in another reality? And who leads the homeland? Explain this to half of the population of Russia, which is on the verge of survival, and taxes are rising, new ones are introduced, inflation. The separation between rich and poor is increasing. And why are these Russians fighting for the leadership that is finishing them off.

[fzr1000]

We also practice vengeance.)))

[Mikhail3]

Borya will simply remove the sapper blade from the bag. And as for the machete, everything will immediately become difficult ...
Calm yourself. The war with a technologically equal adversary for the Americans will not be resolved in hand-to-hand combat, which is why they are afraid. The point is that the courage is not enough for the American army for an equal battle. Never had it. No courage, no valor, no elementary fighting qualities.
In such circumstances, the Americans never fought, and when the same Germans pressed them at least a little, they randomly darted, losing their ammunition, weapons and dirty panties. Although the Germans already experienced a severe shortage of everything.
So I see how a fed-up marine goes to distant lands not to natives with a light rifle to drive, but to cut himself to death. It’s not clear why. With people who control the latest weapons better than him. With tough, courageous, skillful people.
Calm yourself.

[voyaka uh]

"In such conditions, the Americans have never fought" ///

They fought, of course. And with the Japanese there was a lot of melee,
both with the Germans and in Korea.
Although - quite reasonably - from melee they, if possible,
shied away. Like the Germans.

Melee is beneficial to those with a numerical superiority.
Therefore, in the Second World War, Soviet generals sought to impose close combat on the enemy.

[Poppy]

only today's Americans are far from being Americans of the 40s, they are not even Americans during the Vietnam War - everything is much worse

[gringo]

mexes in the cmp are trained for free and after the contract they go to gangs. so it’s not clear whose Americans are training their army, their own or bandos. And what modern weapons are there in the ILC? Well, they are there like stray, babies pick up after the Air Force and Navy.

[voyaka uh]

"[ILC] crumbs are picked up after the Air Force and the Navy" ///

But before the ground forces! Those are the most orphans.

[TOR2]

Quote: voyaka uh

So the brave Boris is likely to be cut off by a machete.

A bayonet-knife can be attached to the AK, but it is problematic to the M16 machete, however. In addition, from national funds there is such an interesting thing - a sapper blade is called. With competent sharpening with an ordinary file, this piece of board breaks through easily.

[gringo]

so avenged they are usually battered and tied

[Mikhail Krapivin]

I would look at it, according to Euronews. Like the American and NATO forces are dispersed over our borders for a long time and difficult, they are pulling up aircraft, equipment and the navy, they coordinate even longer when, where and how to start, as far as I remember Iraq and Yugoslavia, this is exactly what happened. And ours at this time, instead of plumbing, and so that the whole world is in ruin, helplessly wring their hands and cry plaintively. Oh well. Maybe kayaks will happen to us, although taking into account the size of the country, not a fact. But also Europe with two-thirds of the USA will not be found on the map either, fact.

[Rattenfanger]

it will be problematic for them to swing a machete with a sapper scapula in the rectum.

[Manul]

Quote: voyaka uh

A lot of Latinos go to marines: all kinds of mixtures
Indians, Métis, Spaniards.
They assimilate modern weapons with difficulty, but melee, especially
so that with a dagger and cut - a sweet deal. All criminal cases in Iraq when
they "took revenge" on the locals for their killed comrades - on the Latinos.

"Slides! Slides !!!". Links! Links !!! Naturally, everything will always be hanged not on "purebred" amers - marpekhov. For the world community, VVSNN will never say that an amer killed or raped someone.

[Altona]

To fight with a "technologically advanced" enemy, you need to be able to do a lot by hand: calculations in columns, not on a calculator; the ability to read maps, and not use a navigator (well, navigate the terrain). And when they lose power, a lot is lost - communication, maps, calculations. And the fighting spirit in the American army, too, who has, who does not. The fighter from the metropolis does not, from the village in the mountains, there is. And the very concept of war at the ILC consists in one principle - if you are bombed, call a helicopter to suppress enemy firing points, if you go on the attack, the same thing, if you need to move, call a transport helicopter, if you suck, call a medical helicopter. The ILC in the United States is a type of our Airborne Forces, the first echelon shock troops.

[voyaka uh]

I partially agree with you. In the marines, infantry are often taken by the poorly educated,
but "groovy" Latinos. Their task is to attack with dense fire. No wonder they have three lungs
machine gun for one compartment!
But they are supported by their own artillery, mortars. This is where sensible ("white") people are recruited.
When the enemy’s defense is tight, the marines retreat and lie down (quite reasonably)
and call "air" and artu. They have their own air, always at the ready. Those hollow - then the second attempt, the third. They gradually break through the defense. The Marines do not interact with tanks very well. In general, conventional US infantry divisions are better trained.

[Mikhail3]

That is, we dance as before - whoever has the air won. So it’s interesting to see how it will look under the condition that With 300, With 400 and our other toys will take their place in battle formations. And against artillery, we have a lot of fun, so the fire raids will be completely different from what the marines are used to.
What do you think? How will American troops fight when their unrefired planes and helicopters are strewed from above, and from the enemy’s side they are attacked by a solid attack and bombing? Enough of their heat not to escape?

[voyaka uh]

"that S 300, S 400 and our other toys will take their place in battle formations" ///

They will be knocked out for a long time and persistently BEFORE the start of ground operations.
Kamikaze drones, KR, after - IS planes planning bombs.
Until a single radar remains.

[newcomer]

about dreams, about dreams ... will not work, do not wait. indulge in dreams while ...

[voyaka uh]

What are the dreams? God forbid! I have more about nuclear war
dreaming was not enough! I had enough of ordinary skirmishes-skirmishes in my life.

I tell you about the standard scheme of Americans knock out
1) aviation
2) air defense,
3) important objects
4) then a ground operation (not always, only if necessary).

[newcomer]

we who need to know everything perfectly. know what to substitute, what to oppose. in general, they know what it is and how to fight. Yes, and the tactical scheme of the Yankees is somehow flat and simple. it can with Iraq, pass the SFR. Well, here we are not chewing seeds, in fact.

[TOR2]

Quote: voyaka uh

They will be knocked out for a long time and persistently BEFORE the start of ground operations.

And the bouncer won't bend? For example, according to your forecasts, how much will the geyropi energy system be shaken up? Or are you hoping for nothing?

[Mikhail3]

Gee ... Are you kidding me like that? These are not Arabs who received the equipment for free, then allowed them to be seated ... If instead of active ground operations someone tries "long and hard", he will very soon see Styopa from near Bryansk at his command post! If the enemy does not advance, then our army will advance. The Russian army itself always does this as soon as resistance falls. There will be little time to play drones.

[The brightest]

To hear this from a country that has never won ... Learned to at least just fight.

[fzr1000]

It is not true.

[The brightest]

Quote: fzr1000

It is not true.

Data?

[voyaka uh]

That you tell the dead samurai.
In World War II, the entire Japanese elite perished
most officers, almost all pilots and sailors.

[The brightest]

Quote: voyaka uh

That you tell the dead samurai.
In World War II, the entire Japanese elite perished
most officers, almost all pilots and sailors.

Their entire elite perished and surrendered in Manchuria. And the pin-up there is so hot on the side - the Japanese simply did not have time to surrender to our representatives)))

[voyaka uh]

"All their elite died and surrendered in Manchuria" ////

None of the elites were in Manchuria.
All combat-ready officers, all aircraft and tanks
long ago transferred to the active front: Chinese, American, Burmese.
They did not have a drop of fuel for equipment - dry tanks.
Even simple machine guns were taken from them and thrown to other fronts.
Look: was there at least ONE tank or air battle with the Kwantung army?

[Mikhail Krapivin]

Moreover, why then did the brave and skillful American warriors burn Hiroshima and Nagasaki? They already knocked out the Japanese elite, to finish off the leftovers is a simple matter .. Ah, I remembered! There it was already necessary to fight eye-to-eye with the Japanese, on the ground, and not from airplanes and ships, to rot them remotely, and this is too cool for the fearless American warriors, they can kill like that ... So - only with bombs and only from afar!

[voyaka uh]

"In the same place, it was already necessary to fight the Japanese eye to eye, on the ground, and" /////

The Americans made dozens of large landing operations on the islands held by Japanese infantry, there were plenty
close combat in the jungle "eye to eye".
The Marines have always trained on such fights.
But when it’s possible to end the war at once,
why kill your soldiers "for the sake of feat - eyes in
eyes".
As the Russians did in Damansky, where the Chinese
there was an overwhelming numerical advantage - fought "eye to eye"? Not a fig - drove all sorts of Grads, Tornadoes. And rightly so!

[win]

War with a "technologically powerful adversary"

[win]

Notice the difference?

[Navigator Basov]

Do not break, so drown.

[Strength]

This was ours.

[win]

And so wherever the American Marines meet ...

[RomanS]

The right words and tasks do not mean the right thing at all. US Marines are exclusively offensive troops, for operations in other countries. And morale is determined by motivation. To die in a foreign country for money? Doubtful pleasure. Therefore, this concept will not lead to any tangible results.

[gringo]

US Marines will die where they are ordered and their morale is very high. And basically they’re not fighting for money but for the idea (well, they have such an idea) Semper fidelis is the motto of the US Marine Corps and they adhere to it. The problem with the US Army is not in the Marine Corps and not in the fighting spirit of the Marines, but in the analogue of our General Staff. (you can say a lot of bad things about the American marines, or rather, about those who give orders to them, but they are worthy fighters, and in which case they will not back down and give up)

[g1lex]

You are all alone

Quote: gringo

US Marines will die where they are ordered and their morale is very high. And basically they’re not fighting for money but for the idea (well, they have such an idea) Semper fidelis is the motto of the US Marine Corps and they adhere to it. The problem with the US Army is not in the Marine Corps and not in the fighting spirit of the Marines, but in the analogue of our General Staff. (you can say a lot of bad things about the American marines, or rather, about those who give orders to them, but they are worthy fighters, and in which case they will not back down and give up)

You only forgot one thing to consider, when invading Russia, the ILCs will fight not only with the RF Armed Forces but also with the people. . And we have enough weapons for everyone. For us it will be a domestic war. They have zero chance of victory. WWII to you as an example ..

[KaPToC]

Quote: g1lex

And we have enough weapons for everyone.

Everyone in Tsarist Russia had weapons; now the population of weapons is VERY small.

[gringo]

so I didn’t say that the marines would win, I said that they would not give up and run away. The point is not the marines, and even more so not the people (a people without a driving force, a state or some group that has certain reserves and information, is not capable of organized resistance by itself), the fact is that the American army, although it has huge opportunities, over these 20-25 years, both the rank and file and the generals have decomposed. What is Entot American broadcasting about? And in the case of us, they generally have problems because in the event of a first strike failure (surprise factor) they will find themselves in a very unpleasant situation (vast spaces of a millionth army mobilized and ready to respond to any threat and the professional general staff (the main problem of the Americans) that controls this army + Do not forget about the leadership of the country which has already proved that it will not bend). This uncle says. that they will not be able to calculate and correctly respond to our actions. And you can drive any people into a stall, at least for the period necessary for the export of values ​​and the establishment of operational work.

[rotmistr60]

Quote: ddd1975

FALSE is their main ally - to make the enemy doubt the truth ...

And not only the enemy (it’s difficult for Russians to make them doubt the truth), but try to inculcate frank lies to the whole world (the allies will pick her up already). But in this they succeeded incl. and in the fight against Russia ..

[Kibl]

Pyzhat all !!! Frets let them try to play soldiers.

[Samoyed]

The general himself, without a shadow of doubt, speaks of the right of Americans to fight around the world. This is very alarming. That would be for all these warlike generals and politicians, at least on the finger without anesthesia, to start daring, as a vaccine for pacifism. Db.

[Sotskiy]

“The rebels (in Iraq and Afghanistan) were courageous and courageous, but that’s where their opportunities were exhausted,” he said.
“The rebels did not have electronic warfare. They had no air force. They did not have the ability to effectively fire from closed positions. They could not bring down our networks or drown out our signals. They did not have maneuvering armored units. They didn’t come up with complicated plans that could mislead our troops, ”Neller said.

Again, the same tendency towards "exclusivity" can be traced.
As it was announced that Russia and the DPRK are the new national threat to the United States, we are considered in the course of the next insurgents who have declared their rights to the PaxAmerica order, and as you know: "a nail sticking out" But the scumbags of exclusivity do not understand that their marines may not reach the coast of the "rebels". and even if it does, there will be no return to where it will be - at home there will be one continuous Yellowstone.

[DimerVladimer]

.

Of great importance is the information war. “If you can destroy the enemy, it’s good, but it’s better to defeat the enemy without a fight,” the general said

I did not understand - the general is such a stupid person that he thinks that if they "chuckle" the enemy so much, then his soldiers, crying and burning with shame, will trample surrender in batches :), bringing their "Kalashnikovs" on a silver platter? Something the Taliban and the Syrian Barmaley are in no hurry to hand over their "Kalash"
All the same, Zadornov was right ...

Can you quickly change the commandant of the Marine Corps?

[CTABEP]

The concentration of cheers in the comments under such news is always overwhelming :). But in fact - a probable adversary is aware of his weaknesses and works to eliminate them, there is nothing to gnaw about. Although yes, we’ll chop the whole KMP with sapper blades, F-35 do not fly their lines, and no one will fight for money, and finally, Abama-monkey and we suck.

[grau]

Who will let them fight as they used to

[Razvedka_Boem]

Solid hatchery ..

[Mikhail Krapivin]

"If you can destroy the enemy, that's good, but it's better to defeat the enemy without a fight," the general noted.

That is, buy our fifth column and destroy our country and its army from the inside. Traditional for Matrasia strategy.

[kayman4]

.... and they were not Russian

[kayman4]

Well, seriously, the more you know any army of the world from the inside, the less you want to fight. Regrettably, everyone has problems. And the army that best copes with internal problems is the most combat-ready. Recent decades have very clearly brought the problems of our army to the surface, but the West skillfully disguises them.

in 60-80 years, SA was more than the western group and only the presence of nuclear weapons saved them, and they were well aware of this. In the years 90-2010, everything was exactly the opposite, and comrades in the West were just waiting for the cover to come to our nuclear weapons, and local conflicts would finally break up our army.

However, the peak has passed and now they themselves do not know what to expect from us and a hundred to expect from their army - this also saves us

[Olegater]

The new concept of the US Marine Corps: to learn to fight with a "technologically strong adversary"
LATER, the new fascists realized it very late. When training for the weak, you won’t be strong. This concept could have yielded results if introduced in 2000. And so - until conditions are created, programs are provided, funds are provided and soldiers are prepared for these conditions, time will pass, which at the post of p.i.d.so.sov.v. no longer. Russia as a country and army will become more perfect and their notorious concept will again become obsolete.

[Manul]

Quote: voyaka uh

3) important objects

Yeah. Bridges, power plants, oil storage facilities, chemical plants, hospitals, children's institutions. Terrorism in its purest form. Americans do not fight. They suppress all kinds of resistance by any means. And their CNN is filled in later - what Yugoslav-Iraqi-Libyans are "terrorists and destroyers of democratic foundations."

[cedar]

"... New US Marine Corps Concept: Learning to Fight Against a Technologically Strong Adversary."
The hint is clear. The partners ... will meet in the Syrian "ring".

[g1lex]

Quote: KaPToC

Quote: g1lex

And we have enough weapons for everyone.

Everyone in Tsarist Russia had weapons; now the population of weapons is VERY small.

I'm talking about reserves, not about personal weapons. Have you heard anything about general mobilization?