Carter sees nuclear threat from Russia and DPRK

60
During a meeting with military personnel in North Dakota (USA), the head of the US military department, Ashton Carter, once again announced that there was a threat from Russia. This time Carter reflected on the threat of a nuclear nature. According to Carter, he "does not consider Russia to be a country that maintains the balance of nuclear forces and stability on the planet." Where are we to the US in matters of planetary stability ...

Translation of the statement by the head of the Pentagon leads RIA News:
Russia has long been a nuclear power. But the last rattling weapons on the part of Moscow and the creation of new nuclear systems raises serious questions about its commitment as a leader of strategic stability to the observance of long-established rules for the use of nuclear weapons and whether it respects the caution with which the leaders of the Cold War era approached the use of nuclear weapons.




Further, Carter announced that Russia in terms of "irresponsibility" in terms of nuclear safety "is on a par with North Korea."

Carter:
Russia and North Korea stand apart in terms of the nuclear situation, although they are very different. And our task is to keep them from the very thought of using nuclear weapons in conflict with NATO.




Carter adds:
We ourselves are not looking for such conflicts, but are trying to prevent them.


We must assume that NATO "is not looking for a conflict," having already come close to the borders of the Russian Federation, as well as spreading American missile defense systems in Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia ...
  • www.washingtontimes.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    27 September 2016 06: 55
    Where is Iran? Where is Iran? request I would be offended at the place of the Persians.
    1. +3
      27 September 2016 07: 03
      - See the gopher?
      - No.
      - So I do not see. But he is.
      1. +8
        27 September 2016 07: 08
        Let them see better than not see.
        Strategic Rocket Forces are the best guarantor, thanks to the Soviet Union, its scientific school, for being a serious opponent.
        1. +15
          27 September 2016 07: 38
          Thanks to the Russian Empire and its scientific school from Tsiolkovsky to Korolev and Glushko. Whatever form our country performs, its traditions are not interrupted and its supporting geniuses are not translated. So the USA didn’t have its own scientific school, they began to steal scientists, including ours, and that they have now recruited associate professors from the third emigration and that they have pumped aviation, astronautics, and the nuclear industry. Hence the stealth, exploding falcons, the analysis of nuclear charges for reactor fuel and national outlook, the main carriers Antares and Atlas on the engines of the main competitor, and the astronauts on the unions hitchhikers. Degradation on the face, so look what kind of prez, and the candidates are a jester and a paralyzed old woman with a colostomy bag ...
          1. +3
            27 September 2016 07: 42
            And the planets of the solar system are being explored incorrectly. Hooray-patriotism and rushing.
            1. +5
              27 September 2016 07: 45
              We must assume that NATO "is not looking for a conflict," having already come close to the borders of the Russian Federation, as well as spreading American missile defense systems in Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia ...


              Nothing new, the hypocrisy, or rather "the same exceptional" goes off scale.
            2. +6
              27 September 2016 08: 51
              Explore the Solar System Speak laughing and where are the results. The main mirror was formed at the huble, damn Robert, all the core, twice flew to repair it, they say because of this they lost Colombia and finally ruined the manned astronautics. Mars rover, where are the results? They are not there, he could not leave the platform, there are no pictures, there is no main analysis of the atmosphere and soil. There are Voyagers so the Germans are still prisoners ... The rest of the European probes did interesting ... So we are there if anything. And beautiful pictures of the planets are now painted on max. Give the result of soil analyzes, give the atmosphere, is there frozen water or hydrates, NO data, so lies and moon fraud continues, there are enough pictures for you ...
      2. 0
        27 September 2016 11: 50
        That's right, the threat to get an answer was, is and will be. Fashington macaques such as Carter and others like him should always remember that Russia did not start wars, Russia ended them.
      3. WKS
        0
        27 September 2016 12: 07
        Finally, this Carter figured out what he could get from Russia "for nuts." If he had also figured out what can be obtained with a large portion of the same "nuts", he might have become more polite, up to complete deference and much more careful in his stupid statements.
    2. +2
      27 September 2016 07: 05
      Iran, Korea, China is not a threat, but a zilch. But Russia, despite its weakness compared to the USSR, can still destroy most of the military and civilian infrastructure of the United States, this will not help our partners sleep, but when the states can protect from retaliatory nuclear strike of the Russian Federation then they will not resist the temptation to strike first wink In the states, the army is imprisoned for offensive operations, and as we know the best defense is an attack
    3. +6
      27 September 2016 08: 23
      We ourselves do not seek such conflicts, but try to solve them.
      Unleash. negative
      And our task is to keep them from the very thought of using nuclear weapons in conflict with NATO.
      There’s no scarecrow, if you untie it, get it in full. Yes
      1. 0
        27 September 2016 08: 32
        In the military doctrine of the USSR (I do not know how it is now feel ) emphasis was placed on the blow by ALL means! am
        1. 0
          27 September 2016 10: 51
          Quote: SteelRatTV
          In the military doctrine of the USSR (I do not know how it is now feel ) emphasis was placed on the blow by ALL means! am

          Keyword in response ... i.e. the doctrine of the USSR was defensive. The Anglo-Saxons are offensive. The Russian Federation is Ahead, with all that it implies ...
      2. +4
        27 September 2016 08: 33
        I apologize for off-topic: what about the site? Where did the button for the "more" comments go, where could you change-edit your written comment? Or is it just me such an "ambush"?
        And in general: where did the number of site visitors that happened before the Duma elections go? Was there really a lot of traffic on the site just for this reason? Or did the people who disagree with the innovations in VO leave the site?
        Isn't it time to return the "cons"? - Only because of them there will be more visitors.
        1. +5
          27 September 2016 08: 42
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          I apologize for off-topic: what about the site? Where did the button for the "more" comments go, where could you change-edit your written comment? Or is it just me such an "ambush"?

          Not only you, Alexander, also lost the "quote", "complaint" and "more" buttons, there is only one left to answer. request
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          And in general: where did the number of site visitors that happened before the Duma elections go? Was there really a lot of traffic on the site just for this reason?

          But you know yourself, the elections, before the presidential in 2018, the orgy will begin.
          1. +3
            27 September 2016 08: 48
            "the" quote "buttons" complaint "
            And I would remove the button "complaint" altogether: it is here apparently so that site visitors would knock on others when he himself was punished - in revenge, so to speak - thereby doing the work of moderators: after all, it is their duty to monitor violations, not " snitches ".
            1. +6
              27 September 2016 10: 08
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              And I would remove the button "complaint" altogether: it is here apparently in order for site visitors to knock on others,

              Alexander, I agree with you, it would be better if the minuses were returned, instead of the "complaint" button hi
    4. +1
      27 September 2016 08: 42
      This medieval historian in theoretical physics (Carter received a bachelor's degree from Yale University in medieval history and theoretical physics) will pedal to the last the threat from Russia playing at the gates of the old senile Clinton, in the hope that if she wins the elections, he will not be kicked out under the ass from the gray walls of the Pentagon! He will go out of his way to convince a stupid American man in the street drugged by Hollywood of any threat, even from aliens, to stay in his chair, but as a physicist who understands that it is still risky to put on aliens, he will blame Russia for everything! With the hope that at least 50% of Americans know or have heard that somewhere there is such a "terrible" country dreaming to enslave the "beacon of democracy" on Earth ... laughing
    5. +1
      27 September 2016 08: 47
      The threat to the West is all that the West cannot control completely. Iran and China have control of the West, therefore, not a threat.
    6. 0
      27 September 2016 11: 31
      Oh well, the truth is so soldier
    7. 0
      27 September 2016 12: 19
      Again, sweeping some sort of anti-Russian nonsense.
  2. PKK
    0
    27 September 2016 07: 00
    The fact that he does not see well is his problem with Carter, for this there are more powerful eyepieces than on him now.
  3. 0
    27 September 2016 07: 06
    Well, let them see, let them see
    and let them know that if that,
    Russia fucking-it will not seem a little ..
  4. +1
    27 September 2016 07: 14
    serious questions about her commitment as a strategic stability leader to compliance long-established rules for the use of nuclear weapons and whether she respects the caution with which Cold War leaders approached the use of nuclear weapons.
    The key to victory in the war is to surprise means to win. Therefore, I hope that our army has not only the modern missiles mentioned, but also other surprises (which they will learn about in Dakota at the last moment ........) .
    P.S. And the USSR has the rule, and now its heiress has only one after the bombing of Japan. This rule boils down to the fact that the cowboys don’t stop at nothing to establish their hegemony, so you need to stop him with a bayonet or any suitable club until the next time c.g. did not get up from the grave.
    1. 0
      27 September 2016 11: 46
      therefore it is necessary to stop him with a bayonet or any suitable club so that until the next time did not get up from the grave.

      And an aspen stake for fidelity ...
      ___
      Because of such geeks as E. Carter, the tension knot is tightened more and more each time, when it can’t be weakened, it blows so that these freaks themselves squeal like piglets scalded with boiling water, not understanding why it’s so bad with them that they are so good cost.
      8 (#) 8 (#) 8 (#)
  5. +7
    27 September 2016 07: 16
    While in the UN test tube with a threat does not show, I will not believe it!
  6. +1
    27 September 2016 07: 20
    "We ourselves are not looking for such conflicts, but we are trying to prevent them ..."
    The most "main" contraceptives on the planet, after your "prevention", are chaos and seas of blood and tears everywhere.

    "In search of adventure, the brain will never be given the lead!"
  7. +1
    27 September 2016 07: 21
    "Carter:
    Russia and North Korea stand apart in terms of the nuclear situation, although they are very different. And our task is to keep them from the very idea of ​​using nuclear weapons in a conflict with NATO. "

    Ie the conflict is on the face, Carter admits it. The whole task of the Yankees is to keep the conflict between the United States (NATO) and Russia from a nuclear option, which is obviously a losing one for everyone, including Carter's owners, who need war like air, but live as they want. As for us, i.e. Russia, we need to keep the United States, a country that has already used nuclear weapons on the planet, from another insane step. It is insanity that seizes more and more political gods of Western Olympus. "If God wants to punish, He takes the mind out." This means God wants to punish them and will punish them for all their crimes against humanity and humanity. We see at the root.
  8. +1
    27 September 2016 07: 25
    And it will become "former", or, more precisely, second-hand, and will sing like all used and unnecessary completely different songs. Now the position obliges him to bark at Russia, but the concept of conscience, honor is not applicable to such creatures!
  9. 0
    27 September 2016 07: 38
    Nothing new, Carter made a leap into the past, God forbid, logically finish:
  10. 0
    27 September 2016 07: 38
    Pills, drugs, hallucinations, old age, insanity!
    It is a pity that the tongue can still drag or drag)))) and move your hands.
    1. 0
      27 September 2016 08: 12
      Pills, drugs, hallucinations, old age, insanity!

      Not a fig, standard American logic - only the USA should have nuclear weapons. This is the only option that they consider acceptable.
  11. 0
    27 September 2016 07: 39
    Has it already begun to shrink in one place? Or maybe this is a new large-scale diagnosis of "American paranoia" due to the gradual loss of influence in the world? And Europe was infected with this.
    1. 0
      27 September 2016 08: 18
      You look straight at the root))))
  12. 0
    27 September 2016 07: 39
    directly seeing from the army of the Necromongers
  13. 0
    27 September 2016 07: 42
    Russia has long been a nuclear power.
    And this is precisely what the "peace-loving" USA does not like.
  14. 0
    27 September 2016 07: 49
    Russia has long been a nuclear power. But Moscow’s latest saber-rattling and the creation of new nuclear systems raises serious questions about its commitment as a strategic stability leader to long-established rules for the use of nuclear weapons and whether it respects the caution with which Cold War leaders approached the use of nuclear weapons.
    Already who and what on a monkey with a grenade, NATO is more suitable at the head of the United States.
  15. +2
    27 September 2016 07: 50
    As long as the Russian army is able to destroy the United States, the United States will not dare to attack the Russian Federation, because Russian nuclear missiles are the only reason that keeps these jackals from attacking Russia.
  16. +2
    27 September 2016 07: 53
    E. Carter can be congratulated on another performance of the Cold War era. Nothing new, intelligible, let alone constructive.
    Russia and North Korea - stand apart in terms of nuclear situation, although very different

    And if for a second we imagine that the DPRK has nuclear potential equal to Russian. How would Americans really act? Probably no longer protruded beyond their continent.
  17. +2
    27 September 2016 08: 27
    E. Carter can be congratulated on another performance of the Cold War era. Nothing new, intelligible, let alone constructive.

    I have a strong opinion that the farther into the forest, the thicker the partisans, sorry, the closer the elections, the less and less adequate American politicians become.
    It seems that they are now going out of their way to be in the next administration. They do everything so as in the old Soviet song: "Choose me, choose me, the bird of happiness of tomorrow." Where will the new president be such a "bird of happiness"?

    And if for a second we imagine that the DPRK has nuclear potential equal to Russian. How would Americans really act? Probably no longer protruded beyond their continent.
    No way. They simply would not have allowed such a strengthening of the DPRK. But the rhetoric is, of course, militant, although the same US leadership understands that North Korea does not pose a threat to the United States. And even in the case of the inadequacy of the leadership of the DPRK and a strike on the United States, as the "sun-faced" broadcasts, it costs nothing to roll the DPRK
    1. 0
      27 September 2016 09: 30
      I mean, the Americans put us on the same level with the DPRK in terms of adequacy (with the possible use of nuclear weapons). So I presented what I wrote above.
  18. 0
    27 September 2016 08: 34
    He sees! - exclaimed anxious mattresses and tolerasts ...
  19. +1
    27 September 2016 08: 50
    In the pentagan, everything is malacholny! : feel
  20. 0
    27 September 2016 09: 31
    Kondrashka grab this guy Carter!
  21. 0
    27 September 2016 09: 36
    He also wore glasses! What are the questions at all? Strategic Rocket Forces is our guarantor against dismemberment and occupation. So you can sit upright, Mr. Carter. And also a physicist ...
  22. 0
    27 September 2016 09: 58
    And our task is to keep them from the very thought of using nuclear weapons in conflict with NATO.

    Those. says in plain text: "We will fight, just mind you, don't hit on the head!" ...
    Well, then I realized that I was asleep, and decided to excuse myself: "
    We ourselves are not looking for such conflicts, but are trying to prevent them.

    Good day!
  23. 0
    27 September 2016 09: 58
    Carter sees nuclear threat from Russia and the DPRK

    Carter generally does not see well, he is wearing glasses.
  24. 0
    27 September 2016 11: 40
    Oh, these Russians! This Russian bombed Hiroshima, this Russian bombed Nagasaki! Poor Yankees do not know how to defend themselves against the Russian threat. What if they decide to bomb Washington?
  25. 0
    27 September 2016 12: 21
    (Russia has long been a nuclear power. But the last saber rattling by Moscow and the creation of new nuclear systems raises serious questions about its commitment as a strategic stability leader to the long-established rules for the use of nuclear weapons and whether it respects the caution with which leaders of the cold era wars came up to using nuclear weapons.)

    What is true, then it is true that Russia has had nuclear weapons for a long time, but it has never used or deployed it outside its borders. But the United States, being the owners of nuclear weapons 4 years earlier than Russia, used it twice in Japan and once in Yugoslavia (shells and bombs with nuclear cores), and placed their nuclear arsenals around the world. The question is: who is the irresponsible rattle of the nuclear rattle and who, in violation of all the rules, is spreading nuclear contamination across the planet? So shut up Mr. Carter and teach your spiders.
  26. 0
    27 September 2016 13: 20
    The bespectacled blouse again made a nagging sound. From your whining, Carter bloke, nothing has changed. It only became clear that bespectacled one more time laughing
  27. 0
    27 September 2016 14: 12
    The sabering of nuclear weapons comes from the NATO-led countries of the United States deploying their troops on the border with Russia. There are no Russian troops on the US border and a hysteria about the threat is needed to get more money for weapons.
  28. 0
    27 September 2016 15: 21
    The closer the election, the farther the roof goes.
  29. 0
    27 September 2016 17: 04
    this one is still that old goyim! ... which is to be kept myopia ... about the clowns (Obama and Teresa May) who are threatening nuclear attacks right and left! ... he is apparently not aware .... why the snail is different house!? ...
  30. 0
    27 September 2016 18: 08
    In fact, a strange formulation of the question !!! ??? And why do we need nuclear weapons to defend themselves? I doubt even to use it for protection, will demolish half the world. It is necessary in order to keep American talkers and provocateurs on a leash.
  31. 0
    27 September 2016 18: 54
    Russia in terms of "irresponsibility" in terms of nuclear safety "is on a par with North Korea."
    You might think that Russia and North Korea dropped bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Who would talk about "irresponsibility", tepok American, learn history "your narrow-minded" and only then speak out! fool
  32. 0
    27 September 2016 19: 14
    Their monotonous, shameless and unproven labeling is so chilled that you irresistibly want to catch this rubber product and beat it frantically, long and painfully. Such a bastard immediately becomes silk. (Sorry for falling into childhood).
  33. +2
    27 September 2016 20: 27
    Carter sees nuclear threat from Russia and DPRK

    We are happy for you, Carter, your eyesight is excellent, because when there is a lot and not in the case 3.14zdi you threat itself finds you somehow ...
  34. +2
    27 September 2016 20: 49
    Oh, I already have these doves of the world ...
  35. 0
    28 September 2016 12: 44
    It’s time for this paranoid to be treated, for two years it’s only heard from him that he sees ... Wang, damn it ... Do not meddle where you do not need, and sleep peacefully.
  36. 0
    28 September 2016 16: 37
    Carter sees nuclear threat from Russia and DPRK

    And devils and a shabby squirrel. And yesterday they came with friends, we must urgently take something here ... wassat

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"