Military Review

KRET: Russian А-60 will be able to destroy enemy objects using a laser

97
The new Russian aircraft A-60 will be able to destroy enemy objects using a high-precision laser, reports TASS report of the adviser to the deputy general director of KRET Vladimir Mikheev.


IL-76MD

"He will have ultra-precise navigation, because that narrow rays weapons this aircraft got into the objects, the crew must determine the location in space with high accuracy, ”said Mikheev.

According to him, the weapon will be so powerful that A-60 itself will have to be protected from it.

“We understand that the avionics of this aircraft must be refined for the tasks for which it is intended. Since this plane will have power lasers on board, we must protect all the life support systems of the aircraft from the effects of our own weapons, ”the adviser explained.

He noted that the new aircraft will be "purely special, so there will be a powerful power supply system and protection from the electronic influence of the enemy on board."

In addition, "this aircraft will have a very powerful onboard defense complex, since the most modern means of destruction will be aimed at it," added Mikheev.

“I think that it will be equipped with a combined electronic warfare system with elements of Vitebsk, Khibiny and a number of other systems for effective protection,” he said.

According to the agency, work on the creation of a new aircraft under the symbol A-60 is carried out in the framework of the ROC Sokol-Echelon. The first copy of the A-60 based on the IL-76MD took off into the air in 1981. The project was resumed several years ago.
Photos used:
Igor Rudenko / Agency "Voeninform" of the RF Ministry of Defense
97 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Tusv
    Tusv 25 September 2016 11: 06
    +1
    New data?
    Two weeks ago they talked about blinding
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 25 September 2016 11: 15
      +7
      Again the cart in front of the horse. How long to?
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 25 September 2016 11: 24
        +5
        Quote: SRC P-15
        Again the cart in front of the horse

        In fairness. Science is always ahead Steam locomotive Carts
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 25 September 2016 11: 32
          +7
          Quote: Tusv
          In fairness. Science is always ahead of the Steam Cart

          Science - yes! And secret developments love silence.
          1. hrych
            hrych 25 September 2016 11: 40
            +18
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            And secret developments love silence.

            It happens the other way around when you need to scare the enemy, and sometimes start up his industry in a false direction, the Ufimtsev booklet about Stealth came out at one time, they were afraid that the Soviets would get ahead and trampled in that direction, for many years now they had been twisted in this direction, and at the end dead end, moreover, their remarkable aircraft, like the B-1b and F-15, were discontinued. The damage is not just significant, but monstrous ...
            1. SRC P-15
              SRC P-15 25 September 2016 12: 01
              +1
              Quote: hrych
              At one time, Ufimtsev’s little book about Stealth came out, they were afraid that the Soviets would get ahead and run in that direction, for many years now they’ve been twisting in this direction, and at the end there’s a dead end,

              Well, the laser was invented by our scientists Basov and Prokhorov in 1958, for which they received the Nobel Prize in 1964. Something is not visible that the states, "out of fear", were ahead of the rest of the planet in this matter (although they built it first).
              One thing is a theory and a completely different application of this theory in practice - usually they try to classify it.
              1. cniza
                cniza 25 September 2016 12: 10
                +9
                It looks like ours are trolling the United States and making them hurry and "run", it is not clear in which direction.
                1. Strength
                  Strength 25 September 2016 14: 12
                  +12
                  They troll the population of Russia. Like "You see what kind of development we have. We should also tighten our belts" But in fact there is none of this.
                  1. Krasniy_lis
                    Krasniy_lis 26 September 2016 13: 41
                    0
                    Quote: Force
                    But actually there is none of this.

                    Yes Yes Yes. #all lost, #all stolen, #arms does not travel, #wrong Remember. Do not repent? Let's all at once.
              2. Koshak
                Koshak 25 September 2016 23: 09
                +1
                Quote: SRC P-15
                One thing is a theory and a completely different application of this theory in practice - usually they try to classify it.

                And what secrets have you learned from this article, are you our counterintelligence?
            2. avt
              avt 25 September 2016 12: 15
              +1
              Quote: hrych
              It happens the other way around when you need to scare the enemy,

              Well, this is still the late Ustinov did with Shuttle - hard-boiled astronauts with a laser rangefinder, so that they would not fly low. bully His, Dmitry Fyodorovich, Stalin’s People’s Commissar, a favorite topic! A lot of what was left of him on it. They didn’t stole everything in the 90s.
          2. Tusv
            Tusv 25 September 2016 11: 42
            +2
            Quote: SRC P-15
            Science - yes! And secret developments love silence.

            The secret is secrets, but the adversary should smell them.
            I doubt that Hitler attacked us, knowing about the T-34, KV-1, Katyusha
            1. hrych
              hrych 25 September 2016 12: 05
              0
              Quote: Tusv
              the adversary should smell them.

              there will be a powerful system of power supply and protection against enemy electronic interference. ”

              From his radio exposure laughing pilots will be protected by powerful screens, so as not to be welded, or even an unmanned version. It’s just that ours, with the blinding of the enemy, are reaching a new level in energy, the helicopter is not enough, so they put it into such a voluminous and powerful machine. Will extinguish everything at the level of a small country belay and laser tracking optical guidance and guidance, business then wink
              1. Tusv
                Tusv 25 September 2016 13: 07
                0
                Quote: hrych
                Laughing pilots will be protected from their radio exposure by powerful screens, so as not to be welded, or not at all

                I’m just a lad, controlling the brainchild of a rascal
            2. Vladimir Postnikov
              Vladimir Postnikov 25 September 2016 13: 16
              +1
              I doubt that Hitler attacked us, knowing about the T-34, KV-1, Katyusha

              Do you think that the French and the British had a very bad technique in 1939?
            3. kashtak
              kashtak 25 September 2016 18: 43
              +1
              to make the enemy seriously invest in something, all the more to scare the newspaper smell is not enough. sometimes there is little demonstration. in Germany in 1940. They could not have been unaware of the KV-1, this tank "lit up" on the Mannerheim Line during the war with Finland, and most likely they knew about the T-34. the Germans knew for sure about the RS-82. the Japanese shared this information with them. and how are the results? were the Germans very scared? Why do we need such "hot news" at all?
            4. kepmor
              kepmor 25 September 2016 23: 09
              +1
              You shouldn't be like that, TUSV! A weapon, no matter how perfect it would be, without competent specialists - it's just "iron".
              On 22.06.1941/XNUMX/XNUMX we had more tanks, more planes, and more divisions .... so what? Did it stop Hitler?
              Apparently Hitler had well mastered the teachings of our great commander Suvorov - you need to fight not by numbers, but by skill!
        2. Eragon
          Eragon 25 September 2016 11: 45
          0
          Quote: Tusv
          In fairness. Science is always ahead of the Steam Cart

          Well, about science ... What kind of generator will the laser pump up? Where does the power come from?
          1. Tusv
            Tusv 25 September 2016 11: 57
            0
            Quote: Eragon
            Where does the power come from?

            Well, I didn’t study in Baumanka. Uncle talked about low current physics. How to make an oscilloscope from a TV is a mystery to me, but this is a common thing for second-year students
          2. avt
            avt 25 September 2016 12: 18
            +8
            Quote: Eragon
            Well, about science ... What kind of generator will the laser pump up? Where does the power come from?

            Under the DFU, they tore explosives in wagons and planned to detonate nuclear weapons for pumping in space, however, like the USA. Only we already had a Skif, which was drowned by a humpbacked one, and they have a shish. Well, now - years old."
            1. Peacemaker
              Peacemaker 25 September 2016 12: 38
              +2
              [quote = avt] [For guessing the answer, you get ten years. "quote = Eragon]
              Offset! Guess ...
        3. Conductor
          Conductor 25 September 2016 11: 52
          +9
          Well, that's it, now on the right in the news feed on the topvar there will always be headlines like "The West is shocked by the new secret weapon of RUSSIA A-60! ... America is in HORROR, they have not seen THIS before!" etc
          I drank the staff, and we ... were able ... LITTLE!
          1. kashtak
            kashtak 25 September 2016 18: 55
            0
            Quote: Explorer
            I drank the staff, and we ... were able ... LITTLE!

            and the enemy runs, runs, runs ... we are blind with a laser and will be thrown with caps. enough already? lasers are still suitable for auxiliary tasks. like blinding guidance systems or target designation. want to say no? a reference to a serious source on a barrel. then there will be something to talk about.
            1. amirbek
              amirbek 26 September 2016 10: 44
              0
              we’ll blind with a laser and throw it with caps. enough already? laughing
              the quick-firing gun will be there with a jammer and green tracers with laser illumination ... also green
        4. lelikas
          lelikas 25 September 2016 12: 30
          +3
          New 81 year of release?
          1. mav1971
            mav1971 25 September 2016 15: 43
            +2
            Quote: lelikas
            New 81 year of release?


            Here. Here.
            This aircraft will soon be 40 years old ...

            It’s just that some victims of the USE are being recruited to the PR services of our defense industry ...
            I would have shot every second, just for ignorance.
            1. DenZ
              DenZ 26 September 2016 11: 58
              0
              Quote: mav1971
              Here. There, this plane will soon be 40 years old ...

              This is yes, it’s only to be scrapped. For the A-60 there will be a new board (sort of like the IL-76 MD 90A). Old in Taganrog sucks survives. About the filling is better not to mention, everything is also naturally new.
      2. RUSIVAN
        RUSIVAN 25 September 2016 15: 15
        0
        And what exactly bothers you in this ???
    2. vovanpain
      vovanpain 25 September 2016 11: 17
      +12
      The new Russian aircraft A-60 will be able to destroy enemy objects using a high-precision laser

      That's when it destroys, at least at the training ground, then it will be possible to talk, but plans are always huge. request
      1. Kurou
        Kurou 25 September 2016 11: 27
        +2
        Nevertheless, we had working laser systems ..
        True, they occupied 2 heavy tracked platforms ... but nonetheless ...
        I think if you subtract the weight of the platforms themselves and the propulsion systems, a quite acceptable weight will be obtained for an aircraft of this class.
        Another point that there is cooling ...
    3. sub307
      sub307 25 September 2016 11: 19
      0
      Something suspicious ..., wait for news and clarifications on the topic.
    4. Vladimir Postnikov
      Vladimir Postnikov 25 September 2016 13: 10
      +7
      Quote: Tusv
      Two weeks ago they talked about blinding

      That was two weeks ago. Progress does not stand still. Can you imagine what will happen in two more weeks?
      1. Bath
        Bath 25 September 2016 18: 14
        +4
        and I heard Shaw the costume of the warrior will be accompanied by a Jedi sword and a battle stupa with a pomelochest for quick exfiltration
  2. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 25 September 2016 11: 14
    +16
    The entire VO forum knows that a combat laser - a bourgeois-American budget cut -
    because he cannot work according to the laws of physics.
    You won’t be fooled! negative
    1. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker 25 September 2016 11: 24
      +3
      Quote: voyaka uh
      You won’t be fooled!

      Who are you? - Is it possible in more detail?
      laughing
    2. Tusv
      Tusv 25 September 2016 11: 33
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The entire VO forum knows that a combat laser - a bourgeois-American budget cut -
      because he cannot work according to the laws of physics.
      You won’t be fooled!

      Really. It’s kind of silly to call a bourgeois-American cut, when it is called budget development, but the development of a combat laser in the USSR was suspended, and the Yankees intensified their attempts, getting one ship
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 25 September 2016 11: 40
        +3
        "but the development of a combat laser in the USSR was suspended" ////

        So after all, Soviet scientists proved that increasing the power of the beam
        impossible, as faced with insurmountable physical
        phenomena. Is not it?
        Now 2016 - overcame? wink
        1. Tusv
          Tusv 25 September 2016 11: 48
          0
          Quote: voyaka uh
          So after all, Soviet scientists proved that increasing the power of the beam
          impossible, as faced with insurmountable physical
          phenomena. Is not it?

          I’m somehow used to the fact that the detection range of the target does not fit in the PPI (Circle View Indicator) hi
        2. jonht
          jonht 26 September 2016 03: 17
          +1
          On the technical capabilities of the late 80s, as a way out they proposed a method of nuclear beam pumping. Now it is possible that progress has been outlined on this topic, and work is ongoing, and not only in Russia. So, do not make a smart face, you are a (future, acting, retired) officer .... (cross out the unnecessary) laughing
    3. Banishing liberoids
      Banishing liberoids 25 September 2016 11: 41
      0
      A warrior and someone else took a saw too ... fool
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 25 September 2016 11: 48
        +2
        Boeing agents in MO? I feel ... bully
    4. Observer2014
      Observer2014 25 September 2016 11: 45
      +4
      voyaka uh hi
      The entire VO forum knows that a combat laser - a bourgeois-American budget cut -
      because he cannot work according to the laws of physics.
      You won’t be fooled!
      The bourgeois lichtarik in the desert is drying out laughing Now the bourgeoisie will read about "A-60 will be able to destroy enemy targets with a laser." They will sweep the sand from their "weapon of the future." They will print twenty lards, they will ditch them for 10 years.
      This is called the military-industrial symbiosis .Western-Russian military-industrial complex laughing
      Well, if KRET really did it? You won’t get by with a dozen lards! This isn’t for you. It's not a plane with a price of 250 million chasing guns with guns. .Etc.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 25 September 2016 12: 15
        +3
        "Now the bourgeoisie will read about" A-60 will be able to destroy enemy targets with a laser "..... Twenty lards will be printed, 10 years will be killed" ////

        And so that's why it was started ...! To breed Americans on grandmas. Pull in, so to speak,
        into the arms race ...
        Thin. feel
        1. Tusv
          Tusv 25 September 2016 13: 20
          0
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Now the bourgeoisie will read about "A-60 will be able to destroy enemy targets with a laser"

          Eh. My dad said that Tamansky was destroyed from space by a laser, Americans believe that every satellite in space is a killer, deep-sea vehicles cut the Internet.
          And cheat wim will show evil empire? Your imagination
    5. hrych
      hrych 25 September 2016 11: 52
      +1
      Quote: voyaka uh
      You won’t be fooled!

      As a rule, under the guise of some sort of blizzard, they do the real thing. It is difficult to hide from enemy spies that a large aircraft is equipped with a powerful power plant, too many industries and enterprises will be involved. Another thing is the device itself requiring all this, i.e. the emitter itself, the secret of which is not difficult to keep, is that ... it’s hard to say, but is related to electronic warfare. But now for the laser, by the way, this is nothing special and what was done before is really complete nonsense. However, about invisibility, I’ll tell you the secret of the Opener, they work with stealth coatings and reflective forms, we also work, but .... blind the enemy, the difference in concept. There are interesting things about radiation power in this article, size matters there. EW is unambiguous, but the use of a laser with the suppression of all electronic tracking systems of the enemy becomes real, as with the use of EW systems in the IR and other ranges. Also, a laser beam, surrounding a stupidly light gun, is still used for working with plasma, etc.
  3. Stas Snezhin
    Stas Snezhin 25 September 2016 11: 25
    +4
    Although some squeal here, it’s another waste of resources, but I think that the study and testing of new technologies is advisable and even very necessary.
    The time will come and the issue of energy, etc. will be resolved.
    But before, too, the machine gun was considered a stupid machine,
    because he demanded a lot of cartridges, which were in short supply.
    But time passed, and the problem with the cartridges was resolved.
    So here, you only need to be happy for our developers of this project ..
  4. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 25 September 2016 11: 25
    +7
    It is one thing to disable electronics, it is quite another to "destroy objects", although for the current media with their super education at the level of victims of the EG, this is absolutely tolerant.
    1. xtur
      xtur 25 September 2016 13: 18
      0
      > it is absolutely tolerant

      why do I have the feeling that you wanted to say - "this is absolutely one-tolerant"?
  5. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 25 September 2016 11: 39
    +2
    It is beautifully said "power lasers", this is approximately like "field fields"! We laugh at the United States, and with such statements we show our technical illiteracy. First do it, and then bluster.
  6. Neighbor
    Neighbor 25 September 2016 11: 44
    +1
    At one time, you didn’t know that we were already flying on the MiG-25 and that it was ...
  7. vfqjh
    vfqjh 25 September 2016 11: 52
    +3
    The chicken in the nest, the testicle in n ..... and we already count the chickens .....
    1. BOB044
      BOB044 25 September 2016 12: 09
      0
      If they write it means the product is on the way out. For early cards, no one opens.
  8. Delink
    Delink 25 September 2016 12: 02
    +1
    And no one thought that this information was specially announced in advance, so that there would be a decrease in ambition there.
    If they know that We know that they know, then this is in our favor, more likely that there will be a little less Yakat.
  9. Titsen
    Titsen 25 September 2016 12: 05
    0
    Quote: Tusv
    Quote: SRC P-15
    Again the cart in front of the horse

    In fairness. Science is always ahead Steam locomotive Carts


    The main thing Americans confuse, scare!
    1. MarioG
      MarioG 25 September 2016 18: 03
      +1
      Quote: Titsen
      Quote: Tusv
      Quote: SRC P-15
      Again the cart in front of the horse

      In fairness. Science is always ahead Steam locomotive Carts


      The main thing Americans confuse, scare!

      Well, of course, the 1981 flying ram, which "may and will" work, or may not, will scare them a lot.
  10. BOB044
    BOB044 25 September 2016 12: 07
    0
    How long has the movie Engineer Hyperboloid been a science fiction. But it’s a weapon on the A 60. Science runs to our enemies with pride in fear.
  11. russmensch
    russmensch 25 September 2016 12: 15
    +10
    Oh guys, it’s not so simple ... Once you decide to say this, then it's time. I recall the 80s. We, a group of officers, were sent on a special excursion to the Museum of Artillery and Communications in St. Petersburg. They told us a lot of interesting things. The tour was conducted by Colonel, Doctor of Military History. And we believed his words without a doubt. And at one point he showed us air defense missiles and cruise missiles of the 60s, and suddenly says that the warheads carried neutron charges, the explosion of which hit air targets. Believe me, we all precipitated. How so we ask? After all, it was the USA that first made it, the father of the Taylor bomb, and it was much later in the 70s. And we hear the answer - and what's the matter? They did and Papa Taylor theirs. Nobody argues with them. And we already had heads and consider them nameless. We are not given to know who and when made them. Let the states rejoice.
    So it is visible here. States are installing such weapons on a ship, and we are on a plane. And the problems they have and we have the same protection. It remains only to eliminate them. This is where the brawl begins.
  12. Igor V
    Igor V 25 September 2016 12: 38
    +1
    Chatter in a chatter, but we had (and still have) a factory of technological lasers. I wonder what he released?
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. Balferov
    Balferov 25 September 2016 13: 03
    0
    Quote: hrych
    what was done before is really complete nonsense

    talk nonsense? ..
    http://5koleso.ru/articles/obzory/stilet-i-szhati
    e-lazernye-tanki-sssr
    1. Krasniy_lis
      Krasniy_lis 26 September 2016 14: 02
      0
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Сжатие_(лазерный_ко
      mpleks)
      so more precisely.
  15. zoolu300
    zoolu300 25 September 2016 13: 05
    +2
    I have vague doubts. The weight of all pumped equipment is about 50 tons. If this device is intended for the physical destruction of an object, then this is a pure "cut" of the dough. If to disable the equipment of low-orbit satellites, it is doubtful, because the maximum flight altitude of the IL is 76 with this equipment 10000 - 11000 meters, and the flight altitude of low-orbit reconnaissance satellites is 200000 meters. That would raise the application heights by 2 times then the alignment would be more convincing (about "Terra - 3" is not necessary, because it is a stationary installation, where the power is an order of magnitude higher). The Skif was drowned for work on high-orbit objects. If for work on emitters of ground and air radars, then HZ. If for "cutting" the dough by mattress warriors it is stupid. Fed hosts will print green paper. The Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation will invest the papers, already cashed out by our resources, sweat and blood, into American obligations and there will be happiness for everyone except us.
  16. tilix
    tilix 25 September 2016 13: 06
    +3
    Well advers silverfish prasrasit?
    Or overlay with mirrors, even on top of something?
    Smoke again to let the master is. and even dust.
    The fog has not been canceled.
    A little and the volcano ignites at a glance.

    All proposals are based on "Our Answer to American Laser".

    For the correct answer, a free round-trip ticket is offered.
  17. miru mir
    miru mir 25 September 2016 13: 07
    +1
    Ehhh ... How many funny jokes were there aside shappened laughing
    1. tilix
      tilix 25 September 2016 13: 10
      +2
      Well, here you are, but you should be able to
  18. Irbenwolf
    Irbenwolf 25 September 2016 13: 08
    +3
    And more recently, in the pages of the VO ridiculed the American project of such an aircraft (sort of like a waste of money) .... Where is the truth?
    1. hrych
      hrych 25 September 2016 13: 59
      +4
      Quote: IrbenWolf
      on the pages of VO ridiculed the American project of such an aircraft

      To begin with, their project was intended solely to combat ballistic missiles exclusively at the booster stage. The laser itself is a good thing, but the tasks for which it was created for him were impossible, because Russians have changed the concept of using ICBMs (a quasi-ballistic trajectory, reducing the acceleration time due to switching to solid fuel, etc.), why work on an incomplete project if it is no longer promising, plus of course the main tasks were not solved stupidly due to Russian distances and the depths of the territory, as well as the long reaction, while taking off, while reaching the firing range, etc., in general, the birds have already flown away. And it’s unprofitable to afford constant duty, and there’s not much point in it. Because the project was closed. A damaging application concept, the device itself undoubtedly deserves admiration, like our A-60, but the fact that if ours found application of these technologies is simply wonderful.
      1. Krasniy_lis
        Krasniy_lis 26 September 2016 14: 05
        0
        They took and broke off our "comrades" zvedennodavidnykh. That's why you are so
  19. VP
    VP 25 September 2016 13: 33
    0
    It seems like a disu that the Americans again uncovered their closed projects and thumped loot into them with renewed vigor.
    What the hell is he for? Burn a hole in the tank?
    The rocket will do it much more successfully.
  20. Dargavs
    Dargavs 25 September 2016 13: 51
    +1
    That then the Americans, that now no one has shown the real results of at least experimental use, only they have already really spent the money and we have told beautiful stories, there probably is a difference.
  21. guzik007
    guzik007 25 September 2016 13: 58
    0
    It looks more like a roast duck, I remember. There was such a person, with one Faberge, everyone demanded some kind of child prodigy from the eggheads, so that the whole world shuddered. As a result, not a chela, not a waffle.
    Something tells me that we really won’t know about really real achievements and will eat what is served. So to say, a smoke screen helps to completely hide diamonds in a glass of water, which is quite visible in our completely saturated age, that is, in a prominent place .
  22. PKK
    PKK 25 September 2016 14: 02
    +2
    Lasers work well in the atmosphere, much worse in space, because the "movement" of light is a property of atoms in the atmosphere in particular. This topic develops in parallel with hyperspeeds. Other weapons, besides the laser, cannot catch up with the hyperobject. An interesting topic arises of how a laser will penetrate a layer plasma, which envelops the hyperapparatus.
    1. VP
      VP 25 September 2016 17: 25
      +3
      What? Is light atoms of the atmosphere ??
      1. Bath
        Bath 26 September 2016 12: 15
        +1
        and the gas is Gazprom’s atoms)) I’ll go outside to piss and the directional movement of the molecules of the nitrogen-oxygen mixture will move the face of the atoms of the output product straight. I’ll go and go to look at the moving pictures on a yashik from some synthetic fibers
  23. Old26
    Old26 25 September 2016 14: 05
    +4
    Quote: Tusv
    New data?
    Two weeks ago they talked about blinding

    Nothing. By the end of next week, he will already shoot down American missiles over the American continent a minute after taking off flying near Moscow

    The most interesting thing is that nothing is known yet. Unknown maximum power, power per pulse, its duration, and the decision has already been made: the US is catastrophically lagging behind Russia. And that’s all.

    Although if we take the most powerful plants whose capacities exceed 100 Terawatts, it turns out that there are only 43 such plants in the world. Of these, they belong (in decreasing order of quantity):
    USA - 15 installations
    Germany - 6 installations
    China - 5 installations
    Russia, Great Britain, Japan - 3 installations each.
    Republic of Korea and France - 2 installations each
    Italy, Canada, Spain, Romania - 1 installation each

    By a combination of parameters, such as maximum power, pulse power and pulse duration

    Over 1000 Terawatts (1 Petawatt) - 9 countries (in decreasing order of capacity)
    = China, Japan, USA, Korea, China, Romania, USA, USA, China

    Over 500 Terawatts - 9 countries = Russia, Korea, Great Britain, USA, Great Britain, Japan, Japan, China, Russia

    And the last graduation - from 100 to 500 terawatts - another 25 countries. In short, for such laser installations (in terms of the totality of parameters) we occupy
    10, 19 and 43 place. And those who do not know how to do anything and just saw the budget (USA) occupy the following places on such laser installations
    3, 7, 8, 13, 15, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 31, 33, 35, 38

    This is the situation with the stupid
  24. sounddoc
    sounddoc 25 September 2016 14: 29
    +1
    For me, this topic is seen as 50/50. The USSR definitely had groundwork for a combat laser, so the foundation is excellent. Well, and of course, a great desire to troll the Americans, let them rush around. I give a link to a good article, the site is not a fountain, but the material It is well selected. http://pikabu.ru/story/nerealizovannyie_proektyi_
    sssr_4119600
    ...... Sometimes the smile of GDP is very similar to the mysterious smile of the Mona Lisa))))))))))))))
  25. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 25 September 2016 14: 51
    0
    Quote: Titsen
    The main thing Americans confuse, scare!
    Quite original, is it like a hedgehog with a bare ass? Work has been going on for a long time, in parallel, and everyone knows everything about it,
  26. Old26
    Old26 25 September 2016 14: 52
    0
    Quote: sounddoc
    sounddoc Today, 14:29
    For me, this topic is seen as 50/50. The USSR definitely had groundwork for a combat laser, so the foundation is excellent.

    The enemy, too. Back in the late 70s, a magazine such as rocket and space technology published photos from firing ranges, where they conducted experiments on firing at the steps of ICBMs
  27. Neighbor
    Neighbor 25 September 2016 15: 40
    0
    Has anyone, like me, tried to write on a PAPER with a magnifying glass from the sun in childhood? If a NARROW beam from a moving weapon on a moving target? Excuse me, planes unwillingly walk (air pockets and "bumps"), so is the carrier of the weapon? And the hole in the tank is also problematic (wags, jumps).
    1. Balferov
      Balferov 25 September 2016 18: 09
      0
      For a magnifying glass, try on a piece of paper, yes, and try to make dynamite from match heads, and be surprised - why is it not exploding so ?!
    2. murriou
      murriou 26 September 2016 02: 15
      0
      If we are talking about continuous radiation mode, then you are certainly right.
      If we are talking about an impulse, then, under the condition of precise guidance, which is quite realistic to provide modern technology, the task becomes feasible. The pulse time is very short, during this time the position of the emitter and the target does not have time to change in a significant way.
  28. Pilot
    Pilot 25 September 2016 16: 13
    0
    First disperse the clouds, then launch the A-60.
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. Balferov
    Balferov 25 September 2016 18: 12
    +1
    Quote: PKK
    Lasers work well in the atmosphere, much worse in space, because the "movement" of light is a property of atoms in the atmosphere

    And you in general, do you live in this world, or have you not even heard about such a thing as "physics"?
  31. PKK
    PKK 25 September 2016 21: 14
    0
    Quote: Balferov

    And you in general, do you live in this world, or have you not even heard about such a thing as "physics"?

    You use ancient knowledge. Now the foundation of light is different. Read New Physics.
  32. murriou
    murriou 26 September 2016 00: 30
    +1
    Quote: kepmor
    On 22.06.1941 we had more tanks, more planes, and more divisions

    You forget about the quality of tanks / planes / divisions.

    The USSR could not announce mobilization in advance, because not only Germans, but also Americans could consider it aggressive intentions.
    And the maintenance of a mobilized army was very expensive: both because of the banal feeding of the extra millions of people, and even more so because of the seizure of these people by their national economy, which the USSR was trying to use as fully as possible.
    During the local conflicts of 1939, partial mobilization was carried out, but after a short interval the bulk of the mobilized was again dissolved.

    And without replenishment of the mobilized, peacetime divisions had less than a third of the regular staff and a large shortage of motor vehicles. So it turns out that the number of our divisions should be divided by 3-4 times.
    In terms of the number of military vehicles at the beginning of the war, the Germans had an advantage of 1,5-1,8 times, even more in motor vehicles.

    A large number of tanks and aircraft was largely due to obsolete equipment accumulated from the late 20s. This is not a specificity of the USSR: it was the same in France, but to some extent in England.

    In the United States, there was much less old technology, because in the interwar period they produced it disappearingly little. In England - due to the increased sale of obsolete weapons to developing countries during the interwar period, but they also had enough junk by the beginning of WWII.

    But the Germans, under the terms of the Versailles Peace Treaty, which they observed until 1933, gave the winners almost all their heavy weapons during the WWII period, and the production was brought to mass serial production no earlier than 1935, and this was, of course, quite modern weaponry.
  33. murriou
    murriou 26 September 2016 00: 33
    0
    Quote: PKK
    Quote: Balferov

    And you in general, do you live in this world, or have you not even heard about such a thing as "physics"?

    You use ancient knowledge. Now the foundation of light is different. Read New Physics.

    Enlighten, please. How in the non-relativistic conditions of the macrocosm of our Universe have changed the basic tenets of physics over the past half century? laughing
  34. Evil 55
    Evil 55 26 September 2016 02: 52
    0
    Laser weapons are another utopia, designed only for "mastering" money .. The laws of physics are unchanged and the drop in laser energy from the distance of exposure is directly proportional ..
  35. Mentat
    Mentat 26 September 2016 09: 03
    0
    Quote: voyaka uh
    The entire VO forum knows that a combat laser - a bourgeois-American budget cut -
    because he cannot work according to the laws of physics.
    You won’t be fooled! negative

    It is the cut of the budget and stupid PR that the American attempts are.

    Judging by your reaction, it’s very easy to guide you. And your scolding comes from your ignorance.

    Read and educate:
    “The aviation laser complex is designed to transmit laser energy to distant objects in order to counter the enemy’s optoelectronic means in the infrared” (https://lenta.ru/news/2010/08/19/laser/)

    No super-duper-destroying-mega-laser installations for the buck are planned. But electronic warfare systems, including new generation laser systems, Russia has successfully built and is ahead of the United States and everyone else in this area.

    PS I wonder who you plus, schoolchildren who skipped all physics?
    PPS Russian fundamental science is one of the strongest in the world, if not number 1. Scare super-lasers in the US will get only gophers from Minnesota.
  36. Gogia
    Gogia 26 September 2016 13: 01
    0
    My late father-in-law received in 85 the State Prize for the A-60 ... The pulse power of hundreds of MW. At that time, the optics burned out, the laser was gas-dynamic CO2. In general, at that time there was a miracle of technology. If the problem with optics is solved, then it will be possible to shoot down planes for a couple of hundred kilometers ... And to blind is easy. The problem is the expansion of the laser beam, regardless of the medium ... Hence the limited range.
    By the way, the cooling of systems was on alcohol - that's why the first plane burned out ....