Military Review

The United States published only part of the agreement with the Russian Federation on Syria

17
American news agency Associated Press partially published the text of the agreement between Russia and the United States on Syria. This is a document that was agreed upon by Sergey Lavrov and John Kerry for almost 15 hours on September 9.

The United States published only part of the agreement with the Russian Federation on Syria


In the published part of the Russian-American document 5 points. The first paragraph says that at the fixed moment the parties cease hostilities and pledge to refuse to seize the enemy’s territories. In addition, the first paragraph refers to the obligation of the parties to facilitate the unhindered access of humanitarian assistance to the most affected areas.

The second point is devoted to the possible extension of the truce in the future.

The third point is about the conditions for withdrawing troops from the Castello key road in the Aleppo area, followed by the organization of a checkpoint on this road.

Paragraph 4 refers to flight restrictions aviation SAR Air Force in those areas where joint action will be launched against militants of the Al-Nusra Front (banned in the Russian Federation).

And finally, the fifth point implies the creation of a joint focal point after all the conditions of the truce are fulfilled within a week of the entry into force of the agreement.

The document is commented on by the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Maria Zakharova (quote Interfax):
The document of the Russian-American agreements from 9 of September, which was at the disposal of Western news agencies, is only one document from the whole package, in which there are five documents. We initially called on the American side to publish these documents.


Indeed, the published document looks like an attempt by the United States to declare “transparency” of its intentions and actions. However, there is nothing in it that would give an answer to the question of why the United States had earlier strongly opposed the publication of the text of the agreement in open access. There is not a word about the obligations of the United States itself about the impact on the "moderate opposition".
Photos used:
to Reuters
17 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 23 September 2016 06: 24
    +2
    I don’t understand, but why didn’t we completely publish ours?
    1. Finches
      Finches 23 September 2016 06: 36
      +4
      There is a reciprocal situation - just our media and some at the official level roll a barrel on pins ... s, and pins ... yapping at Russia, but I think everything is really agreed, and this is such a smokescreen to cover up diplomatic compromises! Whatever, God forbid, it looks like the US has reached an agreement with Russia without taking into account the opinions of its allies in the coalition! In order not to offend any Hollande and not to irritate the brave Syrian "oppositionists" before the bombing ... laughing
  2. dmi.pris1
    dmi.pris1 23 September 2016 06: 24
    +1
    Indeed ... Why is it classified? There is more talk and hype about the treaty than about the "Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact"
    1. Evdokim
      Evdokim 23 September 2016 06: 33
      0
      There, in small letters in the lower extreme corner, it says "Do not disclose". So that no one would think that the chief executives agreed with the Russian savages. wassat
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 23 September 2016 07: 21
        +1
        Quote: Evdokim
        There, in small letters in the lower extreme corner, it says "Do not disclose". So that no one would think that the chief executives agreed with the Russian savages. wassat

        And large, in the upper right corner, chipboard and number starts with two zeros.
        1. EvgNik
          EvgNik 23 September 2016 07: 34
          +2
          Quote: Amurets
          A large, in the upper right corner

          Kolya, it says: "Burn before reading ..."
          1. VSZMK
            VSZMK 23 September 2016 08: 03
            0
            Do not burn, but eat!
            1. Dryuya2
              Dryuya2 23 September 2016 12: 27
              +2
              Quote: VSZMK
              Do not burn, but eat!

              first we rub, and then let the Americans eat it Yes .
  3. avvg
    avvg 23 September 2016 06: 34
    +3
    In my opinion, the USA is simply not part of the agreement with the Russian Federation on Syria, so as not to offend its satellites from the Middle East.
  4. vitaz
    vitaz 23 September 2016 06: 42
    0
    However, there is nothing in it that would give an answer to the question of why the United States previously strongly opposed the publication of the text of the agreement in the public domain.


    In the rest of the documents, they hit their "brothers", they are afraid that someone will sing in ISIS
  5. dzerzhinsky
    dzerzhinsky 23 September 2016 08: 13
    +2
    Ours, as always, is engaged in verbiage - vague hints about the contents of the document. I believe that we are simply obliged to publish the full text of the agreement, since the United States has already rudely and brazenly violated it (bombing of the Syrian troops).
  6. AID.S
    AID.S 23 September 2016 08: 17
    0
    Kerry, signing the agreement, probably crossed his fingers, and Lavrov forgot to seize the ax for negotiations ...... that's the result.
  7. uskrabut
    uskrabut 23 September 2016 08: 20
    +1
    Well, why are our Foreign Ministry rushing to comment? Take and publish the entire package of documents. As long as there are misunderstandings, the US will use them. And when published, everyone will see who violated what.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 23 September 2016 11: 18
      +2
      Quote: uskrabut
      Take and publish the entire package of documents.

      Nizzyayayayaya !!!
      "Partners" will be offended, pout and burst, splashing everyone with this, like him .... And here! AMBROSIA! laughing
      In general, the situation resembles Vinokur's interlude: "We play here, we don't play here, here we wrap the fish ..." Yes
  8. shinobi
    shinobi 23 September 2016 09: 36
    0
    Amer-s are in their repertoire. They are being settled, now they are looking for the guilty. They will have a damn leg in the army, sometimes the generals themselves do not know whom. The land is in conflict, traditionally with the sailors. The summer is itself alone, and the CIA is against everyone. And there is also a national guard and special operations forces. In short, the right hand does not know what the left is doing and both are not aware of how jo-py is doing. I’m setting up elementary arrangements.
  9. Vodila
    Vodila 23 September 2016 09: 39
    0
    This document seems to be a one-goal game. How to understand not participating in military operations of the SAR Air Force?
  10. razved
    razved 23 September 2016 16: 09
    0
    Again, the Americans have shown their lack of density. They publish only what is beneficial for them, and leave the rest closed and oppose publication. And, by the way, again for some reason not on the official website of the State Department, but in the form of a leak from an "informed source who wished to remain anonymous."
  11. Nasty
    Nasty 24 September 2016 01: 37
    0
    Why are there no minuses for the bad guys?