Military Review

Commander of the Strategic Missile Forces: Bologovsky formation will soon be reequipped to Yars complexes

65
The division of the Strategic Missile Forces stationed in the Tver region will begin rearmament at the Yars complexes in the near future, reports Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.


Commander of the Strategic Missile Forces: Bologovsky formation will soon be reequipped to Yars complexes


“The most western division of the Strategic Missile Forces, located in the Tver region, will soon begin to rearm the Yars missile system. This will be the sixth mobile-based mix, in which the newest mobile ground-based missile system (PGRK) will replace the fourth-generation complexes with the Topol monoblock intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) ”,
quoted by the press service of the commander of the troops Sergei Karakaev.

“This year we have started retooling the next regiments of the PGRK in the Irkutsk, Yoshkar-Ola divisions and are completing this work in the Novosibirsk and Tagil divisions. Previously completed re-equipment Teykovskogo connections, "- he said.

According to him, not less than 4's regiments are rearming each year in the RVSN.

The commander noted that the exercise conducted with the Bologovsky missile compound is “the final stage of the Topol PGRK operation in one of the inspected missile regiments”.

“Certainly, the Rocket Forces achieved such high rates of re-equipment thanks to the use of the ready-made infrastructure of the PGRK missile divisions positional areas, which significantly reduced the cost of putting the new Yars mobile missile system into the Strategic Missile Forces grouping,” Karakayev added.

Help press service: "Yars" has properties that make it difficult to solve the problem of countering: a reduced accelerating section of a rocket flight, significantly shorter in duration than that of previous generations of ICBMs, new hull coverings and other rocket elements, durable and lightweight design, powerful engines and control devices capable of work with significant overloads. In the near future, together with the Topol-M complex of the RS-12М2 complex of the Topol-M complex and the RS-24 ICBM of the PGRK Yars group, already put into service, will form the basis of the Strategic Missile Forces grouping.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
65 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. darkmind
    darkmind 21 September 2016 14: 00
    +2
    Rearm - do not rearm, nothing will help. The USSR was also well armed. Where is the USSR? The strategy will be against us such that the missiles will not help. Please read my two previous comments, answer them.
    1. drunkram
      drunkram 21 September 2016 14: 04
      +11
      Stupid? The mere presence of such weapons in our country makes the hairs on our heads stand on end, and not only of our "partners", the nuclear shield is for that and the shield that it does not have to be used to defend the country. Are you a relative of Gorbachev by chance?
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. gg.na
            gg.na 21 September 2016 16: 51
            +2
            But where are there so many all-inclined people then ?! Like damn mushrooms after rain bully
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. darkmind
            darkmind 21 September 2016 17: 02
            +1
            Listen, what I wrote. I just suggested that a nuclear war could happen. I just suggested that in Russia there will be an attempt to organize a revolution.
            For some reason everyone writes every day that the United States will attack Russia.
            It’s true that there will never be a nuclear war, and if it does, they will call us and tell us that in 15 minutes they will start bombing us.
            Why am I accused of idiocy and inadequacy?
            I do not understand.
            1. vovanpain
              vovanpain 21 September 2016 17: 37
              +10
              Quote: Darkmind
              Why am I accused of idiocy and inadequacy?

              The prosecutor accuses, the judge passes the verdict, and the doctor makes the diagnosis, and forum users simply answer you.
              Quote: Darkmind
              Please read my two previous comments

              Please read not only the last two, but all forty-one of your comments, one more was added to the questions that I asked you, Tell me do you seriously believe that the UK will destroy Russia in 20 minutes? All questions remain, one Matyugi, sorry, you still answered, thank you for your courage
              1. darkmind
                darkmind 21 September 2016 17: 53
                +4
                Unfortunately, if they launch their 300 nuclear warheads on Trident ICBMs. S-400 will not be able to bring them down. All major cities will then be destroyed. And Moscow’s missile defense will not last long either. Unfortunately.
                I just brought the script. I apologize to everyone who called the United States a great country. Russia is also a great country.
                1. vovanpain
                  vovanpain 21 September 2016 20: 31
                  +9
                  Quote: Darkmind
                  Unfortunately, if they launch their 300 nuclear warheads on Trident ICBMs. S-400 will not be able to bring them down. All major cities will then be destroyed. And Moscow’s missile defense will not last long either. Unfortunately.

                  Alexander, I told you about the Britons, well, they won’t bullet us, they won’t, without your order from Washington, they will even die according to your scenario, either by their own will or by the will of Washington, not by any will, until they they won’t be sure that there will be no retaliatory strike, now they’re not sure, that’s why all this formidable rhetoric comes from, we can’t give a look in the face, we’ll even scare us with a cry. Remember Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, which they didn’t bother with, shocked where they just climbed without tubes and the UN, in Libya, a friend of Medvedev then presided, he abstained from the UN, then Putin almost drove him by the face on the air. And it was necessary.
                  Quote: Darkmind

                  I just brought the script. I apologize to everyone who called the United States a great country. Russia is also a great country.

                  Alexander, just express your thoughts more clearly, so that their meaning can be immediately understood and take your time simply. And for which the apologies of the USA And Russia, China are world powers, it’s just that the USA has to follow the same path that Russia and China have passed. EnglandAn opponent who doesn’t fear is underestimates him, Who is afraid, overestimates who respects, is not in danger. I don’t remember who said it, but the idea is right. Something like this. hi
        3. drunkram
          drunkram 22 September 2016 06: 22
          +2
          The USSR disappeared from the map thanks to people alarmists like you, to a lesser extent of course. To a greater extent, the corrupt government, of course, squandered values ​​and substituted its people (and descendants) under economic consequences, which contributed to the collapse of the country, as a result of which the country's former power is still being restored. So until we raise the patriotic mood in the country to the maximum, when individuals like you do not cease to exist in the country, only then will the country begin to rise, only then will no one from the country's leadership want to sell their native land to a foreigner for cookies and their people for good , he just won't have a reason to do it. Then we will be the greatest power, because in the west, where hypocrisy rules and the thirst for profit, this will never be achieved. What then will the USA and their sixes be able to oppose us, well, in addition to their bloated fleet?

          Now the Army and Navy are rapidly growing in power, the strength of the airborne forces is slowly but steadily growing, the patriotic mood in the younger generation is growing, the same generation will grow according to their upbringing, and the mistake that made the collapse of the USSR will never be repeated.
    2. dmi.pris1
      dmi.pris1 21 September 2016 14: 04
      +3
      Make a link to your comments, I will answer.
      1. drunkram
        drunkram 21 September 2016 14: 05
        +5
        I read his comments ... it would be better if I didn’t
        1. AleksPol
          AleksPol 21 September 2016 14: 19
          +2
          The guy of military science fiction has read, and here the rustling roof goes slowly
          1. darkmind
            darkmind 21 September 2016 14: 31
            +2
            And YOU argue why this is impossible.
        2. megavolt823
          megavolt823 21 September 2016 14: 46
          +3
          So do I . read. I didn’t want to offend anyone, all the more so, but: the liberalist is an uncle along the way. vaseline of political worldviews. it’s raining on your TV channel. Colorado and quilted jackets are damned here. whom I am. will not appreciate the depth of your knowledge. with respect hi
          1. darkmind
            darkmind 21 September 2016 14: 58
            +1
            I am not a liberal and not a padded jacket. I have a balanced patriotic approach. Argument why what I wrote is impossible.
            1. Diana Ilyina
              Diana Ilyina 22 September 2016 11: 01
              +7
              I have a balanced patriotic approach.


              Yes, only you forgot to mention that you are a patriot of a completely different country and its name is mattress!
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. katalonec2014
      katalonec2014 21 September 2016 14: 08
      +2
      If Russia didn’t have nuclear weapons, we wouldn’t exceed Lithuania in size, I would have ended up abroad.
      1. darkmind
        darkmind 21 September 2016 14: 29
        0
        The scheme is very simple, like in a children's game: Britain destroys Russia, Russia destroys Britain, but not the USA, the USA bomb China. That's it, the end of the game.
        1. megavolt823
          megavolt823 21 September 2016 15: 00
          +3
          Quote: Darkmind
          The scheme is very simple, like in a children's game: Britain destroys Russia, Russia destroys Britain, but not the USA, the USA bomb China. That's it, the end of the game.

          China is the main US holder for the core. debts. and have a large diaspora around the world. the United States is located very not very. sem-eight nuclear strikes. marksmanship. part will be in the ocean, part will know what an earthquake which did not know. and there it shakes. Usa is a very puffy country, it looks like a gopnik. which did not receive bribes. that's all . hi
          1. darkmind
            darkmind 21 September 2016 15: 10
            +1
            Well, that is, do you think that there will NEVER be a war between the USA and China? And the military budget of $ 600 billion is the case for the game. The war between the USA and China will be in the next 4 years. To do this, inadequate Trump is made president to hang it all up on him. Trump is the future president of the USA (100%), see on November 8. But the US will not pull the war with Russia and China. Therefore, in Russia there will be either a revolution or a war, but not with the United States, to get us out of the game.
            1. vovanpain
              vovanpain 21 September 2016 16: 27
              +9
              Quote: Darkmind
              The war between the USA and China will be in the next 4 years. For this inadequate Trump make the president, then to hang it all on him.

              Avon, how do you already know the time of war? Did Obama say that to you? Or Xi Jin? How do you know Trump is adequate or inadequate? Can Hillary be inadequate? And who makes Trump billionaire president?
              Quote: Darkmind
              Therefore, in Russia there will be either a revolution or a war,

              When 5.11.2017/XNUMX/XNUMX? Greetings from Maltsev?
              Quote: Darkmind
              what I wrote, that I realized how mentally inadequate I am.

              That's for sure, only a psychiatrist can answer this. hi
              1. darkmind
                darkmind 21 September 2016 16: 44
                +3
                The time when there will be a war I do not know. There may be no war. I just made an assumption about how it could be. I am not saying anything.
                The British general said in May 2016 that the war with Russia will be within a year.
                The Chinese general called on the Chinese people to prepare for war.
                USA throws ships to the Chinese coast.
                Theresa May said that Britain should scare Russia with nuclear weapons.
                And after all this, do I need a psychiatrist?
                It will be just wonderful if we agree peacefully with the United States.
                I do not support Maltsev.
                I did not vote for PARNAS.
                I do not call for revolution.
                I only warn against negligent bliss.
                Now read the entire text and make the conclusion: is my psyche normal or not?
                1. vovanpain
                  vovanpain 21 September 2016 18: 46
                  +10
                  Quote: Darkmind
                  I just made an assumption about how it could be. I am not saying anything.

                  Okay Alexander, I’ll try to answer you, as for the diagnoses, this is the doctors’
                  Quote: Darkmind
                  Trump is the future president of the United States (100%), see November 8th.

                  Isn’t this a quotation from your comment? And you write that you do not state. request And why is Trump not adequate? Rather, Hillary is pushed into the White House, our Zhirinovsky can also be called inadequate then. But Zhirik and Trump are far from fool
                  Quote: Darkmind
                  The British general said in May 2016 that the war with Russia will be within a year.

                  Well, there’s generally not only one British general, British and German generals and NATO generals are vanging, the Baltic mice out of their pants are climbing into the war with Russia, it would be better if others would protect them, because they’ve generalized pranksters and mice have money from that . And from this follows:
                  Quote: Darkmind
                  USA throws ships to the Chinese coast.
                  Theresa May said that Britain should scare Russia with nuclear weapons.

                  Actually, China is the main opponent of the United States, here I agree with you, that's why mattress covers put all sorts of sticks in the wheels of cooperation between Russia and China, by all available means, but fight neither China with the main holder of its debts, nor us, equal in military strength (I have in view of), we surpass them in some ways, we concede in something, google it and analyze and think about it. And Teresa May cannot pee in the toilet without looking out, and you say scare. And what, 200 warheads, I apologize for the accuracy, I don’t vouch, from memory. And 1600 (also from memory) from Russia? Teresa May, though she doesn’t pee unattended, but far from du.ra, in 20 minutes ONE Great Britain can destroy Russia in a wet dream only or only TOGETHER with NATO and the USA.
                  Quote: Darkmind
                  It will be just wonderful if we agree peacefully with the United States.

                  And who argues that this is bad, the question is only on what conditions? If on the terms of the USA and the company, I don’t want to go back to the 90s. Well, I don’t call for revolution and warn against negligence. I agree with you.
                  1. vovanpain
                    vovanpain 21 September 2016 18: 55
                    +9
                    Quote: vovanpain
                    N. Something like that.

                    I will add that the Almighty knows everything, and we can only expect.
              2. gg.na
                gg.na 21 September 2016 17: 01
                +2
                Quote: vovanpain
                That's for sure, only a psychiatrist can answer this.

                Dear colleague !!! It’s a hike of a provocateur-frog tykl-mikl bomzh or Michael bom Journalist if you remove the journalist then we get Michael bomzh !!! (bump-to-bom wassat ) Of which I have a desire to take a neck and strangle like a chicken !!! With great respect to you hi colleague!!!
                1. darkmind
                  darkmind 21 September 2016 17: 19
                  0
                  I don’t understand what I wrote wrong. Why so much aggression. Specify specific words that you do not like. If you do not like my comments, please write to the moderator asking you to delete my account WITH ALL MY COMMENTS (this is very important). I agree to delete the account, because it is unpleasant for me to communicate with inappropriate people.
                  I'm not joking: write to the moderator.
                2. vovanpain
                  vovanpain 21 September 2016 17: 55
                  +9
                  Quote: gg.na
                  the desire to take a neck and strangle like a chicken !!!

                  Good afternoon, dear colleague! hi Of course, it’s not necessary to strangle anyone, but to explain that he is wrong, it’s necessary on the contrary, I read, of course, his comments, my gray hair stands on end, I realized one thing, that I need to dig a caches to a depth of a kilometer, well, I hope that before that will not reach. lol Regards, Colleague. hi
            2. megavolt823
              megavolt823 22 September 2016 11: 09
              0
              what is your opinion in this. one can doubt not quite agree. Nadejets on the Indian. but !!!! Bolivar will not stand. hi
        2. Ostwest
          Ostwest 22 September 2016 11: 04
          +1
          A blow to Russia from NATO will receive an answer to the main and main bandits: Omeriga and Aglia. The list may be expanded based on the situation. Enough for everyone who is in NATO. The same pschek with carls.
          On Aglia, 9 (nine) thermonuclear charges are enough for its transformation into a radioactive valley. Not 300. I would think about it in their place about such a "ravine".
          Yes, launches, everything in our direction is under control and jokes, such as the usual charge there, are not accepted. The retaliatory strike will be no joke.
          It’s clear that it’s not where it flew from, neutralizing an empty space is useless. Goals are prioritized by importance. It will be fun for the aggressor without jokes ..
    4. Evgenijus
      Evgenijus 21 September 2016 14: 27
      +6
      Rearm - do not rearm, nothing will help. The USSR was also well armed.

      The limit of some kind.
      In the USSR, the Strategic Missile Forces were the basis of the immunity of the country. What did Gorbachev, according to a tip from the West, begin to destroy in the first place? That's right - the Western regiments and divisions of the Strategic Missile Forces. And it does not matter that some of these weapons were outdated. The resource of missiles was, the readiness was. What he did not touch the infantry?
      If political workers in the Kremlin had not climbed into strengthening the country's defense, the Union would have been alive.
    5. DenZ
      DenZ 21 September 2016 14: 31
      +3
      Quote: Darkmind
      The strategy will be against us such that the missiles will not help. Please read my two previous comments, answer them.

      Do not worry, since the collapse of the USSR, we have become a little advanced and have drawn the appropriate conclusions. We will not let the ideology of the West beat ourselves with impunity.
      1. megavolt823
        megavolt823 21 September 2016 15: 16
        +2
        and the world is different. that’s what the mattresses do not understand. China from which the word can not be broken. rinsing this world order in full. The last reception of Obama by the Saudis. twenty in china. Turks. even the president of the tajikian country of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duarte, rinses obamycha with a blog in literary language. the world is different. hi
    6. Koshak
      Koshak 21 September 2016 23: 32
      +2
      Quote: Darkmind
      Rearm - do not rearm, nothing will help.


      Plaster cast! Customer is leaving! So what, iksperd?
  2. dmi.pris1
    dmi.pris1 21 September 2016 14: 06
    +3
    Tovarisch does not understand .. I mean Darkmind
    1. darkmind
      darkmind 21 September 2016 14: 26
      0
      LEARN THE SITE TO LEARN !!! I wrote this to you, Buddy.
      1. dmi.pris1
        dmi.pris1 21 September 2016 14: 40
        +3
        What a friend I am to you! I do not have friends who have escaped from a mental hospital ..
        1. darkmind
          darkmind 21 September 2016 14: 54
          0
          And you write more than two words, with arguments why it is impossible that I wrote, that I realized how mentally inadequate I am.
          1. megavolt823
            megavolt823 21 September 2016 15: 32
            +2
            morally unstable. and dangerous as a political maniac. as a gopnik with bipolar disorder and as a prostitute with AIDS. good
        2. megavolt823
          megavolt823 21 September 2016 15: 19
          +1
          no, I wouldn’t let such a handsome man go. he would have spoiled my taren. urinated with azaleptin. wassat
          1. darkmind
            darkmind 21 September 2016 15: 33
            0
            Listen up. Stop writing nonsense already. Reasonably prove that I'm wrong. And I will easily change my mind. And you better feed yourself with medicines.
            1. gg.na
              gg.na 21 September 2016 17: 12
              +2
              Quote: Darkmind
              And I will easily change my mind.

              So can only argue a real inveterate TRADER! Not No. will be here with you "dear" to talk reasonably !! You are not worthy wink this !!! Traitors lol despise everywhere !!! Yes
              1. darkmind
                darkmind 21 September 2016 17: 28
                0
                Listen up. I don’t understand why such aggression?
                Yes. I change my mind under the influence of arguments.
                What are your real claims against me?
                1. gg.na
                  gg.na 21 September 2016 17: 32
                  +1
                  I have no desire to communicate with traitors. bully
                  1. Diana Ilyina
                    Diana Ilyina 22 September 2016 11: 23
                    +7
                    I have no desire to communicate with traitors. bully

                    What is true is true!
                    And do not understand. You do not bother even laughing !!! Gee gee gee! And do not stop the site into a booth! My you negative !!!

                    Too many liberals have become on the site, after its "update", be it not okay! Previously, such an inadequacy would have been quickly sent into oblivion, but now, if you please put up with any liberal shit, with "alternative" thinking ...!
                2. gg.na
                  gg.na 21 September 2016 17: 40
                  +1
                  Quote: Darkmind
                  I don’t understand why such aggression?

                  And do not understand. You do not even bother me. laughing !!! Gee gee gee! And the site in the booth is not stop turn! My to you negative !!!
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. darkmind
        darkmind 21 September 2016 17: 21
        0
        Based on what words. Give specific words.
        1. gg.na
          gg.na 21 September 2016 17: 38
          +1
          If you, as you please, prove to everyone here that you have a head and she knows how to think, then the words are not needed and you will understand everything yourself! And if your head lol not capable fool to think and think that here will not be enough and a billion Yes words! So with you I do not have No. nor any desire to communicate! wink
  3. Danil Laryon
    Danil Laryon 21 September 2016 14: 07
    +5
    Russia will stand, not stagger while we have forests from Yars. drinks
  4. PKK
    PKK 21 September 2016 14: 14
    +1
    Buy shoe polish, polish the wheels in "Kronakh", only on the roof of the container, the same must be cleaned and washed, otherwise you will climb onto the container, and there are last year's leaves with dirt. Good luck to the rocket scientists. The alcohol is not all inside, leave it on the connectors!
  5. maximus235
    maximus235 21 September 2016 16: 36
    0
    Interestingly, will the YARS fit into the "crown" from under the Poplar?
    1. Colonel
      Colonel 21 September 2016 16: 51
      0
      No, it will not fit.
  6. minus
    minus 21 September 2016 18: 01
    0
    I would like it not to rearmament, but to create new units with yars ... Poplar could serve for a long time. I don’t think his stock is exhausted. But the emergence of new positions of the ICBD would add a headache to the 'partners'. It is necessary to maximize the number of wassat deployed missiles ... And do not care about all the contracts ... This of course is purely my opinion, please do not judge strictly
  7. minus
    minus 21 September 2016 18: 03
    0
    Sorry for the possible grammar and spelling mistakes. Firstly, from the phone (t9 writes whatever), secondly, the hand with which I am writing is broken ....
  8. Old26
    Old26 21 September 2016 18: 06
    +1
    Quote: Darkmind
    The scheme is very simple, like in a children's game: Britain destroys Russia, Russia destroys Britain, but not the USA, the USA bomb China. That's it, the end of the game.

    Where did you find such a scenario? The British have only one boat with incomplete BC missiles at sea. On the part of the missiles in general, 1 BG. In total, the British for 2016 have only 120 BB. And you think that 2-3 dozens of blocks will destroy Russia? Enchanting.

    Quote: Darkmind
    Well, that is, do you think that there will NEVER be a war between the USA and China? And the military budget of $ 600 billion is the case for the game. The war between the USA and China will be in the next 4 years. To do this, inadequate Trump is made president to hang it all up on him. Trump is the future president of the USA (100%), see on November 8th.

    Trump is more adequate than Clinton. And the US military budget has always been huge and every time they thought that war would begin? It’s just that the cost of weapons has now become such that you want, if you don’t want, and the budget will grow

    Quote: Darkmind
    The British general said in May 2016 that the war with Russia will be within a year.

    And England has something to stir up such a war game? The generals and politicians should be treated very carefully.

    Quote: Darkmind
    The Chinese general called on the Chinese people to prepare for war.

    And our generals and politicians also called on the Soviet people to talk about a war with imperialism. And what was the war

    Quote: Darkmind
    USA throws ships to the Chinese coast.

    This has already happened more than once. And there is still no war between the United States and China

    Quote: Darkmind
    Theresa May said that Britain should scare Russia with nuclear weapons.

    And what should the newly appointed politician say? Say what she is for peace, while England is in the wake of US politics.

    In general, not a single post about the news. But the news itself is very symptomatic. At one time there was talk of re-equipping the Rezhitsa division with the "Rubezh". Then everything fell silent. Now they are talking about rearmament at Yars
    1. darkmind
      darkmind 21 September 2016 20: 07
      0
      Hello Vladimir. An adequate person is immediately visible.
      The number of 120 nuclear warheads is enough to completely turn off Russia from any future wars.
      How many million-plus cities do we have?
      Imagine: we will have destroyed all command posts, all major cities: Moscow, St. Petersburg. The disintegration of the republics from the Russian Federation will begin. Large industrial centers will be destroyed.
      The trick is that the United States is distancing itself from UK support in advance.
      First, a non-nuclear war with Britain will begin, which will quickly develop into a nuclear one.
      And here there will be a dilemma: after the launch of warheads - to retaliate only against Britain or even the states with the risk of getting a retaliatory strike from them, too.
      Regarding Clinton: if a neighbor wants to set fire to your house, then he is unlikely to tell you about it.
      The US will be able to pull the war with China only in the next 3-4 years.
      When the Chinese deploy DF-41 missiles, war between the US and China will be impossible without mutual destruction.
      A coup d'etat in Russia may not work out, which is why I wrote a few, maybe a fantastic scenario with Great Britain.
      Well - that was my last comment on this site.
      I promise to keep my mouth shut and not discuss my crazy thoughts with anyone, unless there are insults against me against my comments made earlier.
      I'm going to build a bunker.
      It would be nice to delete my account along with all my comments.
      Goodbye to everyone.
  9. Old26
    Old26 21 September 2016 18: 37
    +1
    Quote: Minus
    I would like it not to rearmament, but to create new units with yars ... Poplar could serve for a long time. I don’t think his stock is exhausted. But the emergence of new positions of the ICBD would add a headache to the 'partners'. It is necessary to maximize the number of wassat deployed missiles ... And do not care about all the contracts ... This of course is purely my opinion, please do not judge strictly

    As they say, there are two opinions: mine and wrong. In this case, your opinion is not correct. Of course, you can’t give a damn about contracts. It’s only if only the Americans were worse off. But we will be worse.
    "poplars" have practically served their term and the time of their operation has been extended several times. The most recent - 1993. That is, for at least 23 years already. And we still cannot change solid fuel charges, as Americans. And we can't release a lot. No more than 40 missiles per year.
    1. minus
      minus 21 September 2016 20: 06
      0
      And for what reason we cannot change solid propellant charges ??? I'm sorry, in this regard, what are we behind the Americans ???
    2. minus
      minus 21 September 2016 20: 23
      0
      * Yes, and we can’t release a lot. No more than 40 missiles per year. *
      I’m talking about this ... Why can not extend the service life of old products ??? Or is the production of new cheaper ???
      I perfectly understand that it is necessary to do revisions and warheads ... But !!!!! Isn't it cheaper to service the finished product than to create a new one ????
      1. minus
        minus 21 September 2016 20: 29
        0
        Maybe I’m not right ... I’m not looking again ... Maybe I’m confusing poplar with poplar-m ... But ....
    3. megavolt823
      megavolt823 22 September 2016 11: 57
      0
      hello old friend that the enemy is not necessary laughing PC-24 “Yars” is a Russian solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile of a mobile and mine based with a multiple warhead. there you are . 40 missiles? 2010 to 2016? how ? my phone was lost in the Kremlin. maybe call find out. laughing and how many in the ranks ur100n untth? and then Darkmind is worried. nothing supposed to arrange a salute. all hope for china. many Utkin’s people were cut like Darkmind. but they will start. or lie? We are waiting for the official informant. tongue
  10. Ostwest
    Ostwest 22 September 2016 10: 43
    +1
    Quote: drunkram
    Rearm - do not rearm, nothing will help.

    It will help. Still how it will help. Reinforced concrete will help. Already helps.
  11. Old26
    Old26 22 September 2016 15: 46
    0
    Quote: Minus
    And for what reason we cannot change solid propellant charges ??? I'm sorry, in this regard, what are we behind the Americans ???

    Unfortunately, we do not have a proven technology for replacing bonded solid propellant charges suitable for mass use. The Americans have such technology. And they, according to their LEP program, replaced not only electronics, blocks and stages of breeding, but also engines on the Minutemans. WE are forced to write off "Topol"

    Quote: megavolt823
    Be old friend that the enemy does not need laughing PC-24 "Yars" - Russian solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile mobile and mine based with a divided warhead. there you are . 40 rockets?

    And what is it written for? Or do you think others do not know? And about 40 missiles for ground-based and launches VMZ.

    Quote: megavolt823
    from 2010 to 2016? how much ?

    At the beginning of 2016, 73 ICBMs. Of these, 10 are mine and 63 are mobile. How many Yarsov will be added in 2016 is still difficult to say. The minimum is 9, the maximum is still unknown, but not less than 18-21.

    Quote: megavolt823
    my phone was lost in the kremlin

    Such phones need to know by heart

    Quote: megavolt823
    my phone was lost in the Kremlin. maybe call find out. laughing and how many are in service ur100n untth?

    In the ranks? There is no such term. There is a term expanded or not expanded. Deployed - 0, non-deployed - 30. That is, we can say that we have 30 ICBMs UR-100N UTTH, but they have ZERO warheads.
    Will this answer suit you? Or paint in which regiment which
    deployed?
    1. megavolt823
      megavolt823 22 September 2016 19: 37
      0
      Didn’t you call Kozelsk accidentally? Maybe they switched to logs? Or were they brought poplar there?
  12. Old26
    Old26 23 September 2016 10: 14
    0
    Quote: megavolt823
    Didn’t you call Kozelsk accidentally? Maybe they switched to logs? Or were they brought poplar there?

    What is this post about? It seems like most of your posts are NOTHING. The fact that you have problems with the Russian language is understandable to everyone. Just look at most of your posts. Sometimes a set of rambling phrases. But I didn’t think that you still have problems understanding the Russian language. I absolutely wrote CLEARLY that:
    Deployed - 0, not deployed - 30. That is, we can say that we have 30 ICBMs UR-100N UTTH, but they have ZERO warheads.

    Or you need to chew that the division is being rearmed and the 35th ICBM has been removed from the database. One regiment has already been rearmed, the second is now being rearmed. It is not yet known whether the third will be rearmed. And since the missiles have not yet been disposed of, they are listed as not deployed. That is, without BB.
    You do not have to be seven spans in your forehead to understand this. It is enough to take the last official data exchange and calculate the number of deployed BG.

    And as for your sarcastic phrase about whether "Topol" was brought to Kozelsk - yes, they did. For the name of "Yars" during development was "Topol-MR"
    1. megavolt823
      megavolt823 23 September 2016 13: 21
      0
      hear the philologist go to the geologists in the forest. In Kozelsk, a scalpel stood and stands with a bb. Unit address: 249725, Kaluga Region, Kozelsk-5, military unit 54055. with 2013 YRS set. Xnumx mines were ready xnumx. connoisseur of the eras. hi
      1. megavolt823
        megavolt823 23 September 2016 13: 27
        0
        Valentina Egorovna - 8 (910) 540-75-65 - a one-room apartment near the hospital in Kozelsk. May help with leave for the soldier. hi
  13. Old26
    Old26 24 September 2016 19: 34
    0
    Quote: megavolt823
    hear the philologist go to the geologists in the forest. In Kozelsk, a scalpel stood and stands with a bb. Unit address: 249725, Kaluga Region, Kozelsk-5, military unit 54055. with 2013 YRS set. Xnumx mines were ready xnumx. connoisseur of the eras. hi

    Quote: megavolt823
    hear the philologist go to the geologists in the forest. In Kozelsk, a scalpel stood and stands with a bb. Unit address: 249725, Kaluga Region, Kozelsk-5, military unit 54055. with 2013 YRS set. Xnumx mines were ready xnumx. connoisseur of the eras. hi

    Is it worth it? That's just in the amount of bb they have no place. To do this, just take the annual data exchange. And according to them, the UR-100N UTTX appear as non-deployed