Russian experts commented on the statement of the British General about the inability of NATO to repel an attack of Russian troops

Russia will be able to deploy its troops in Great Britain for 2 days, while the Alliance will take months to deploy such a group on its own territory, ex-commander of the British joint forces Richard Barrons said recently.

Russian experts commented on the statement of the British General about the inability of NATO to repel an attack of Russian troops

“During the Cold War, the NATO commander in Europe could draw up a plan to repel aggression and mobilize all forces. But after the collapse of the USSR, they left such planning. As a result, in the event of an attack by Russia, after a part of Europe is occupied, the council of 28 participants will discuss for a long time what to do, ”the general said. Free Press.

In addition, Barrons noted that the NATO contingent in Poland and the Baltic states does not have the necessary firepower and, of course, will not be able to resist the Russian troops.

"In my opinion, this is an indicator that in the present period stories many have forgotten what an effective army should be and what is required for it. They believe that the deployment of light infantry will be enough, but this is not the case, ”said the ex-commander.

Leading expert at the Center for Military-Political Studies MGIMO Mikhail Alexandrov: “The British general realistically assesses the situation, NATO really cannot quickly transfer troops to Eastern Europe. The inability of the alliance to act in Eastern Europe was laid initially, at the time of Poland and the Baltic states joining NATO. In Eastern Europe was the infrastructure of the Warsaw Pact, not NATO. And this infrastructure gradually decomposed, collapsed. The armed forces of these states are degraded. In the Baltics, there were no troops at all; it was part of the Soviet Union. Our troops left, and there was nothing left.

The only more or less strong army can be considered Polish, it can expose up to one hundred thousand people. But on aviation they are weak, the Poles do not have modern electronic warfare systems, modern high-precision weapons... Even if Poland deploys a large grouping, it will not be able to resist the Russian authorities. It will turn out to be something like 1939, when the Poles boldly rushed into cavalry attacks against tank columns. In two weeks nothing was left of them. And here the same option is possible, if we think hypothetically.

And the British general says that in such a situation something needs to be done. But you can do it in different ways. You can simply agree on the normalization of relations with Russia, to conclude an agreement in the field of security and arms control. Then everything will be fine.

But NATO wants to dictate its terms to Russia. At the same time, in the present conditions, the alliance has no opportunities for this. If an escalation of the conflict occurs somewhere, a clash of Russian and American troops occurs, we will inevitably bring troops into the Baltic States. The cost of such an operation will be insignificant, even taking into account the six thousand NATO military forces stationed there. So the alliance will have to pay a high price for colliding with Russia, say, in Transnistria.

This is a pitiable situation for NATO. They understand this and are therefore nervous. ”

"SP": How capable is the NATO structure itself?

Alexandrov: “NATO is irrelevant from 1990, when the Warsaw Pact was dissolved, and then the Soviet Union ceased to exist. Russia suggested jointly thinking about collective security in order to save military spending. Moreover, no one thought about redrawing the borders in Europe, and there was no threat to anyone. But it all started with the fact that NATO began to move to the East. Then the alliance began to divide Yugoslavia. And in the end, NATO invaded the territory of the post-Soviet space, creating a threat to Russia.

Instead of creating a new security system in Europe based on equality of rights, the West chose a different path. The West needs dictation over the whole world. And he began to aggressively promote their policies. Only, as it turned out, aggressive actions are not backed by real strength. Western policy held on the fact that Russia voluntarily gave up its position. As soon as it stopped, as soon as our elite realized the fatality of such a path, it immediately became clear that NATO had no military power to confront us.

The alliance now does not know what to do. They are sharpened for confrontation, ideological confrontation. But the West cannot carry out its claims of military domination. Economic sanctions do not act as expected. In the same way, the West cannot cope with China, or with India, or even with Iran.

NATO is really at an impasse. From here and all throwing inside the alliance. They have the only way out - to negotiate with us, to think about the joint provision of security in Europe. ”

Vice-President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems Konstantin Sokolov answers the question of the publication “how to understand the words that the NATO group in Poland and the Baltic states does not have sufficient firepower?”: “The general says absolutely correct. But the stationed troops in the Baltic States and Poland are, in fact, police forces. These are forces that take control of the territory, but do not reflect a blow from the outside or do not attack others. The general understands perfectly well that stationed troops must keep control of their own territory.

Take, for example, the situation in Ukraine. On the Maidan, law enforcement agencies did not know what order to execute, and politicians were afraid to give it. And if there is some external force that obeys orders from the outside, even one battalion, then it can instantly restore order.

The Baltic States have always been a “showcase” of the USSR, where they even had their own academy of sciences, creative unions of writers and artists. Now the Baltic states are in the most terrible degradation. In many areas, production is ruined, agriculture also does not flourish. The Baltic countries have already lost up to a quarter of their population. In the near future, there may be a manifestation of discontent. The armed forces of NATO, who are there, guarantee the establishment of order. "
  • AP / TASS
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    21 September 2016 09: 30
    Within 2 days, Russia is able to deploy its troops in the UK, while the North Atlantic Alliance will need months to deploy such a group on its own territory.

    As accurately noted. NATO soldiers do not know how to fight without "lace panties", dry closets, cafe-bistros and other conveniences ...
    1. +14
      21 September 2016 09: 41
      Quote: SS68SS
      Within 2 days, Russia is able to deploy its troops in the UK, while the North Atlantic Alliance will need months to deploy such a group on its own territory.

      As accurately noted. NATO soldiers do not know how to fight without "lace panties", dry closets, cafe-bistros and other conveniences ...

      Not worth so dismissive. All these “warnings” about NATO’s unwillingness to conflict with Russia have a clear basis.
      But the guys can overdo it - in the end, they will inspire this in their own subcortex and voila. laughing
      1. +9
        21 September 2016 09: 46
        Voila, is it like ?? In the window from the tenth floor, shouting "Russians are coming!" .. Yes, for God's sake. Just give me money here.
        1. +6
          21 September 2016 10: 50
          Let the cannibals tremble and sweat, your end is known.
      2. +3
        21 September 2016 11: 33
        Srlasen ... - "Shapkozakidatelskie" moods never brought to good. I had to "sober up, having washed myself with blood ...".
        1. +6
          21 September 2016 12: 50
          Quote: sub307
          "Shapkozakidatelskie" moods never brought to good. I had to "sober up, having washed myself with blood ...".

          ... that is, do you think that for example there are combat-ready armies in the Baltic states? ... Poland has over 60 thousand full-time civil servants. all ... the 000th Army in my province in Kaliningrad will already have at least 11 divisions, not counting the dowry and BF ... that is, 2 thousand l / s ... a, they say in connection with the responsible direction and all 25 divisions ... bully
    2. +13
      21 September 2016 09: 42
      Well, uuu, we started using earflaps ... ("To beat the enemy with little blood, on foreign territory")

      1. +1
        25 September 2016 22: 41
        Then the USSR paid very dearly for such hatred. I would not like to repeat the situation. Just the people in the country is not enough. In general, news in the style of Russian tanks is not possible to knock out with anything, and then immediately Russian ATGMs knock out any tank I consider harmful
    3. +11
      21 September 2016 09: 44
      NATO remains out of work, so they screamed at the Russian threat. And it is time for the Poles to repent for participating in the outbreak of World War II and return Germany to the territories donated to her by Stalin.
      1. +8
        21 September 2016 10: 04
        The article aptly observes that NATO cannot threaten Russia, and accordingly dictate its conditions, that’s what worries them the most. And all this talk about the Russians conquering us is nonsense.
        1. +7
          21 September 2016 11: 05
          Quote: katalonec2014
          And all this talk about the fact that the Russians will conquer us, nonsense.

          Why so? Let’s take a look at their Military Doctrine - the Global Disarmament strike. Those. the first strike by thousands of missiles on missile defense, radars, airfields, barracks. The second stealth strike, finish off the infrastructure with precision bombs, the third stage is the gain of air supremacy, the fourth is the invasion of ground forces. So, because of the MRIS, advanced air defense, and most importantly, the large distances from the borders and the coast (subsonic CRs and Stealth fly clocks, and they still have great problems getting to the coast) to our heart (Moscow), ridge (Urals), liver ( Lower N), kidneys (Krasnodar, Stalingrad) that I refuse to write about the excreting and genitals laughing Those. the first two stages of the doctrine are already flawed (therefore, for this they need hypersonic RC). The remaining steps no longer make sense. And now, can we implement their Doctrine in the EU? Yes we can! From the Crimea and Kaliningrad, and from the fleet (and unexpectedly from diesels and watchdogs belay BF, Black Sea Fleet and CF) will be able to deliver a disarming strike to the Kyrgyz Republic and ... Iskander, there are no distances there, their centers are close to the shore. We can suppress their insufficient ground air defense, respectively, we can seize air supremacy, and our ground forces are capable of decisive throws into the cauldrons and dumped into the La Manche, thick-assed gay men under the command of the national forces - very scary women. Also, their fleet with decent and promising Aegis anti-aircraft defense will again neutralize our RCs due to the transition to supersonic when jumping out of the horizon. We also have hypersound, not only the BB ICBMs, but also the x-32, turn into an armored (withstand the burst from the volcano and anti-aircraft missile) hypersonic projectile diving from 40 km onto the ship and not only with a speed of more than 5 max .
          So I suppose that's what the old British dog meant.
          1. +6
            21 September 2016 11: 26
            "and our ground forces are capable of taking decisive throws into the cauldrons and throwing them into the La Manche" ///

            Fancy a la Budyonny-Tukhachevsky.
            The Russian Army is able to take the Baltic states and Eastern Poland. This is maximum.
            Maybe Moldova is still ...

            In turn, NATO in nature does not have ground forces to invade Russian territory.

            So the situation is a draw. It would be better in Russia to think how to cover the Far East from the military giant of China.
            That's who has enough ground forces and reserves!
            1. +6
              21 September 2016 11: 27
              Quote: voyaka uh
              Fancy a la Budyonny-Tukhachevsky.

              Not. Alya Zhukov, Konev, Rokosovsky!
              By the way, argue not with me, but with the British general laughing
            2. +2
              21 September 2016 11: 36
              Excuse me generously, but amused about Moldova ... do you know their armed forces ?.
              1. 0
                21 September 2016 13: 18
                Intrigued. Expand your thought - what do you want to say?
                1. 0
                  26 September 2016 19: 40
                  I agree I really want to hear the script)) No, I don’t mind that the Russians come here quickly, we have 50 more years of such occupation with the construction of factories and plants, but let the script tell and I would like to remind you that we have no common border with Russia! You can also compare how to capture the Vatican with his army in the center of Italy
            3. +9
              21 September 2016 12: 05
              Quote: voyaka uh
              It would be better in Russia to think how to cover the Far East from the military giant of China.
              That's who has enough ground forces and reserves!

              There is such a city in the west of China called Kashi, the former Kashgar from it, the distance to Tel Aviv is only 3700 km (medium range), and it stands on the Great Silk Road, this route is optimal for caravans and the army (land) around the mountain in several thousand meters and desert. Spanking a land army is easier for you than in the Urals and European Russia, in order to defeat the Russian Federation it is not enough to capture the Far East, we are still a single country. So the PRC army can only use the Silk Road to the former Rome, i.e. in the Mediterranean, in general to you. Not only that, Paisius the holy man prophesied that the Hunweigins would gather 200 million army and capture belay Jerusalem, at the last world divide. The Russian Federation will take the North, India the South, and China the middle (your) latitude. There is no question about America, there is a Yellowstone volcano, either a tsunami from the landslide of the Canary La Palma, or from our Kuz'kina mother. You can certainly laugh, but the whole Jewish world is entirely prediction request .
              1. +6
                21 September 2016 12: 22
                By the way, our doctrine is not offensive (like the West), not defensive (like the USSR), but proactive, with all that it implies. We do not need to seize resources and use them safely from radiation. If a hypothetical threat arises, we will burn thermonuclear charges of any (applies to the Chinese), we have enough of our own resources and land, and I brought their Doctrine against them, because their strategists are doing this. The Briton is talking about what, about the inability to repel our offensive ala their doctrine ...
              2. +5
                21 September 2016 14: 24
                What a passion! Are you from the Jehovah's Witnesses sect?
                They like to discuss geopolitics in terms of prophecy.

                All that you wrote about the Russian army is pink fantasies.
                I repeat: the Baltic countries and eastern Poland are Russian land
                forces can really capture. I mean conventional
                the war. Then everything will stall.
                There is nothing to talk about nuclear war.
                4 UK nuclear submarines guaranteed to destroy all major cities
                Russia (as a response to a nuclear strike on its territory).
                Americans may not even press buttons. So the British general
                somewhat in "polemical fervor". He is offended that the ground forces
                Britain was cut by almost zero. Only the special forces remained.
                1. 0
                  21 September 2016 15: 25
                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  4 UK nuclear submarines guaranteed to destroy all major cities
                  of Russia

                  Do you know why the Anglo-Saxons dismantle their nuclear weapons?
                  1. +9
                    22 September 2016 09: 58
                    Do you know why the Anglo-Saxons dismantle their nuclear weapons?

                    Yes, it’s useless to explain anything to this satoy warrior-ear. For him, everything American is great, but all of our city is but, well, manure in general. He poor fellow believes that their vaunted flying g ** but Fu-35, is a panacea for all ills. And his reasoning that the Russian army will be able to capture only Poland and the Baltic states is simply ridiculous. And who forgive us can stop further ?! Is the Bundeswehr with cuttings from shovels instead of machine guns ?! And about four British submarines it’s generally funny, I’d remember about the American submarines, but now the little shavens who have only memories from the fleet!
                    1. 0
                      26 September 2016 19: 54
                      You would throw hats would be champions. Yes, the Russian army, of course, in comparison with 90 years, has made great strides, but to say that you can easily pass all of Europe is simply ridiculous. Stupidly, soldiers will not have enough equipment. And remember the 39 year Finnish war, how many Finns were there? and how much more was the Soviet army? The losses were almost 1 in 8 not in favor of the USSR (
          2. +4
            21 September 2016 11: 42
            Quote: hrych
            Why so? Let’s take a look at their Military Doctrine - the Global Disarmament strike. Those. the first strike by thousands of missiles on PU, radars, ...

            I know for sure and world experience proves that, as well as not planning a large-scale operation, especially against a strong opponent, a priest always jumps out of the bushes. And always unexpectedly and from where they did not wait at all, and therefore were not ready. And all the plans go to hell ... laughing
    4. +6
      21 September 2016 10: 05
      Here the media, together with the couch generals, again hysteria about Russia-NATO relations. It is necessary to unite, and not to engage in garbage. There would be no such bad people, everyone in the whole world would live well and peacefully, would develop to fantastic heights. And here - we are marking time, we are sharing something, fighting. Who needs this?
    5. +5
      21 September 2016 10: 30
      Quote: SS68SS
      As accurately noted. NATO soldiers do not know how to fight without "lace panties", dry closets, cafe-bistros and other conveniences ...

      Respected SS68SS, VO is trying with all its might to be a serious site, uniting normal, adequate users. Well why the heck are you writing this? Did you clash with GI in hand-to-hand combat in Vietnam? Maybe the helmsmen of the Selfless Yorktown were rammed?
    6. +4
      21 September 2016 11: 01
      dear living veteran ask. how can not fight the west. the number of victims must be known to all parties. 41 to 45. thanks to Stalin, we were more ready then than now. chat with the colonels above and above. explain to you in more detail. The former power of the USSR did not just rust. she was destroyed. I'm not talking about panic. I'm talking about a sober look without a bang. hi
      1. 0
        26 September 2016 20: 06
        You are 100 percent right. Unfortunately, many members of the forum here, whether in their youth or on the wave of messages from a television set, about a couple of missile launches or about 10 new tanks released, make far-reaching conclusions as we will now defeat everyone without getting up off the couch. You read the memoirs of the same Zhukov as it was hard to fight and at what price victories were given.
    7. 0
      21 September 2016 12: 36
      There is nothing funny. Great Britain is a Zombie country. So we think that since the United States is part of NATO, the United States will not allow them to do anything without a team. BUT IF THE USA WILL NOT BE IN NATO, THIS IS OUR MOST SCARY NIGHTMARE. UK can destroy RUSSIA with its Tridents in 20 minutes. WE WILL FINALLY SUN THEIR ISLAND (UK). BUT Americans will be indifferent.
  2. 0
    21 September 2016 09: 32
    Well prepared and competent answer. That's just the answer to the next outstretched hands from General Richard Barrons, who takes an example from his American colleagues
  3. +2
    21 September 2016 09: 34
    Yes, dissolve yourself .... and then there is no NATO - no problem! Got already eternally preoccupied ..... with Russia, the forces of the Poles and the Balts were going to fight?
  4. +3
    21 September 2016 09: 36
    As a result, in the event of an attack by Russia, after a part of Europe is occupied, a council of 28 participants will discuss for a long time what should be done, ”the Free Press quoted the general as saying.
    What kind of nonsense are the NATO generals ready to bear, in order to once again force them to fork out the European citizen for the content of all this, in general, useless pack ....
    1. +9
      21 September 2016 10: 32
      Quote: Black
      to once again force a European citizen to fork out for the contents of this whole, in general, useless pack.

      So the ex-commander of the British joint forces knows what he says, he is not an expert in a jacket, he is a real fighter of the New World Order, his words are authoritative. And the fact that he "cries" means we are on the right track. Since the reconciliation of Georgia, we showed our teeth when there was a battle for the Caucasian ridge. Let me remind you that even though the Georgians acted as meat there, nevertheless, the Americans developed and commanded the operation with the Israelis, our aviation was monitored by AWACS, air defense was provided by svidomye, the JPC was put into combat mode (it is clear that the positioning and coordination with the NATO tracking forces were carried out from our captured special forces of the Hammers), the Georgian army itself was preparing to be included in the alliance in all respects (before destruction). Nooo blitzkrieg failed, our artillerymen transferred more advantageous enemy positions, aviation with losses, but seized air supremacy, and it was the finest hour of the Su-34 (if you remember), our fleet and of course parts of the special forces performed well (of which no one doubted ). In general, there were no new weapons, the Georgians were equipped with advanced electronics of American-Israeli production, including thermal imagers, excellent communication and coordination with NATO tracking systems. But ... you remember. Then there was the battle for the Black Sea and the enemy did not even have time to utter a word, plus interesting events with the American destroyer Cook (and they say that he was supposed to cover the subsequent landing of NATO special forces to support the bravely fighting Ukrainian contingent). Moreover, the number of Georgians and Svidomo was commensurate with the attackers, but the NATO preparations did not materialize (Yanukovych was overthrown by the pro-American Svidomo army elite, the dirty Ragul Maidan - a diversion). Well, and Syria, where the military-space technologies are demonstrated in truth, which are not a gram inferior to NATO in the technical and electronic level. Those. 3 wars - demonstrations with great geo-political consequences:
      1 war, the Russian soldier survived and with inferior technology in advance due to training, discipline and fighting spirit, overthrew the enemy (moreover, they destroyed the doctrine of blitz krieg)
      2 war - Themselves demonstrated blitz krieg and showed the inability of the pro-NATO army to oppose.
      3 war demonstrated an advanced technical level.
      And do not forget that behind the back are still new ICBMs and Boreas ...
      Conclusion An invincible Russian soldier is present, trained and prepared for a decisive breakthrough, armed no worse than the best army on earth, the rear is covered by a miracle weapon of retaliation (ICBM) So what do you want from old British warriors laughing He is absolutely right.
  5. +13
    21 September 2016 09: 37
    Russia within 2 days is able to deploy its troops in the UK “Do we need this?”
    1. +1
      21 September 2016 10: 09
      Indeed, why, if all the major cities of Europe are under our guns. One volley and voila - stone age.
  6. +4
    21 September 2016 09: 39
    Russia is able to deploy its troops in the UK within 2 days, while the North Atlantic Alliance will take months to deploy such a group on its own territory, Richard Barrons, former commander of the British combined forces, recently said.

    Well, you have to disrespect yourself so that you can openly talk about the armed forces of your country. Where is the famous British pride ?! Or is it just another "bullet" whose purpose is to make the civilized Western society even more afraid of the Russian barbarians?
    1. +3
      21 September 2016 09: 50
      Dignity, self-respect and military honor are not among the pan-European values. And to get yourself financing, all means are good. As the students said - 5 minutes of shame and you ... And do not take their words very seriously. The United States never gives up, they go to the last, squeeze everything possible out of the situation. Be that as it may, you must first build up your power, without regard to their weakness.
      1. +2
        21 September 2016 10: 04
        Be that as it may, you must first build up your power, without regard to their weakness.

        You can’t argue, however. The cat wept for allies, so the hope is mainly only on myself, on the army and navy.
  7. +3
    21 September 2016 09: 41
    it hurts the ear when the "expert" says that the West needs control over everything and everything, or rather it will be, that America needs to control everything and everyone, and NATO is just a tool in achieving this utopian idea, and in general the seizure of foreign territory in the classic version of modern war is no longer relevant, there are other ways to force the enemy to do his will ...
  8. +7
    21 September 2016 09: 48
    All these statements by NATO generals and experts pursue two goals at once. First, to knock out extra money for new weapons from their governments. Secondly, throw dust in the eyes of a potential enemy and divert attention from measures to increase combat readiness. Therefore, do not comment on all this. Moreover, Russia is not threatening anyone but terrorists and their sponsors, even fascists entrenched in Europe.
  9. +7
    21 September 2016 09: 55
    And all the same, it would not be necessary to underestimate NATO in such a “hacky manner”. The Alliance can be a very tough adversary. We need to keep the powder dry, you never know.
    1. +2
      21 September 2016 10: 14
      When you read their statements there is a sense of virtual reality. The main factor - nuclear weapons are not taken into account. Why do we need a foothold in the UK? - enough to destroy the infrastructure. With their population density this will be enough - they will rest themselves.
      1. 0
        21 September 2016 14: 14
        The funniest thing is to do it all at once, to destroy all power stations - everything, alles, is already a stone age. If 30 years ago, it was less critical, then this hour - they can’t even buy food.
  10. +1
    21 September 2016 10: 01
    The NATO troops have already specifically become obese and most likely are not suitable for prolonged hostilities. But this does not mean that it is not necessary to pay attention to it, it is necessary to constantly keep in sight the full potential of the NATO troops.
  11. +2
    21 September 2016 10: 02
    ... in the event of an attack by Russia

    I’m wondering, once again you’ll divorce Europe for money, but there is no attack and no, what else will you come up with? Okay, the Baltic states and the Poles, they are knocked down by the Russian threat, so you can do whatever you want with them (the Poles are so happy to lie under the Americans), but what about old Europe? Money runs out quickly, but new tales have not yet been invented.
  12. +4
    21 September 2016 10: 08
    During the Cold War, the NATO commander in Europe could draw up a plan to repel aggression and mobilize all forces.

    Previously, he could, but did not want to. Now I want, but I can’t. Aging, gentlemen from NATO, aging.
  13. 0
    21 September 2016 10: 12
    How naive it is to stupidity.
    Of course, no one will believe in his words.
    This is all, the continuation of the conversation about the need to create a united army of Europe. And the strengthening of the NATO contingent in the Baltic states! Well, money is money is money
  14. +2
    21 September 2016 10: 15
    They should calculate how many minutes they will begin diarrhea. If they bring the case for a warning strike against Russia, Russia, although Russia is not interested in their territory, we would have to sort things out and put things in order.
  15. +1
    21 September 2016 10: 15
    This is an American arms lobby marketing company.
  16. 0
    21 September 2016 10: 20
    [quoteDuring the Cold War, the NATO commander in Europe could draw up a plan to repel aggression and mobilize all forces.] [/ quote]
    Why not take the old plan? Thrown out?
    1. 0
      21 September 2016 14: 04
      He was lit up and now they see hordes of horse-drawn drills on Armat tanks everywhere.
  17. +2
    21 September 2016 10: 23
    1. The power of the Western economy will even out the imbalance in the armed forces, a matter of time.
    2. The situation in Ukraine, Georgia, Transnistria, Syria ... shows the weakness of Russia both in the diplomatic and military directions.
    3. There was such a minister Grachev, "Pasha Mercedes" is his "disease" contagious? laughing
    4. Unlike Russia, there are no fools in the west and they have good roads laughing What Gorbachev presented to the West, Yeltsin is tantamount to treason.
    5. The West will impose its will on Russia until it gets in the face.
    6. Hoping for good neighborly relations with the EU - stupidity, offenders offended by natural resources, never come to terms with rich Russia.
    1. +1
      22 September 2016 11: 25
      Military dictatorship sweeps away any economic force. If that;) As they say, there would be a desire - there are opportunities. Mechanisms worked out to automatism. The party will say it is necessary - we all will answer;) And whoever does not answer will bury him;)
      1. 0
        26 September 2016 18: 44
        I welcome you Eugene and all members of the forum!

        I agree with you completely!

        But we need to clarify one important point:
        - WHAT THIS PARTY will take care of US and our HOMELAND?

        The top leadership of the country and all the Kremlin, Duma, provincial so-called "sons and daughters of the people" can and are ready to defend "THEIR Motherland" with our blood and our children ...

        But to defend only so that they "THEMSELVES and their loved ones" - DO NOT HURT and God forbid they do not die and do not become crippled without legs, without eyes, without hands!

        And to defend "OUR Motherland", not sparing us ordinary citizens, those in power are able to ...

        Now there is no power under the authority of Joseph Vissarionovich, who did not exchange his son for a German general !!!

        And as for patriotism and plunder, I’ll repeat only the statement of Mikhail Yevgrafovich Saltykov-Shchedrin who is over 150 years old:
        "When they talk about patriotism in Russia, you should know that something was stolen somewhere!"

        I do not urge you to raise your hands in the air and DO NOT PROTECT THE HOMELAND from OUTER enemies, and especially from INTERNAL ENEMIES (the latter are more dangerous than "external" enemies)!

        But I consider it necessary for all of us to cast aside any DANGEROUS jingoistic patriotism of hap-hatching and blind faith "in the GOOD Tsar and Evil Boyar" !!!

        Just think and ask simple questions:
        - And why?
        - Who benefits from this?
        - What happens if...?

        And much of EVERYTHING UNSPECIFIED by the top leadership of the countries and their parquet shouters from the stands, the screen, "hand opposition parties _ the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and the Liberal Democratic Party" - you will immediately become clear and accessible ...
  18. 0
    21 September 2016 10: 34
    Quote: Thirteenth
    Russia within 2 days is able to deploy its troops in the UK

    Do we need it? Rains, damp, island in one word lol What do they have, what Russia does not have? request Oh yes, European values lol But we definitely do not need them! laughing laughing laughing
  19. +1
    21 September 2016 10: 37
    The entire NATO block consists of America's sunniest heap of slaves and three Baltic dogs.
  20. 0
    21 September 2016 10: 50
    When you have 5 friends, it is quite possible to protect them. And when you cover 20 not quite friends and not always adequate ones, then a situation may arise when you don't really want to defend. Especially when a person himself inadequately got into the problem. A large number of obscure NATO members reduce the principle of "One for all and all for one" to scrap. Better alliance members and less good ones appear ....
  21. +3
    21 September 2016 11: 04
    Russia within 2 days is able to deploy its troops in the UK

    There is no point in commenting on such nonsense.

    To deploy in the Baltic States in two days is a difficult task in itself.
    In the UK, how? Aviation? Air defense means who will crush? In general, some kind of nonsense.
  22. 0
    21 September 2016 11: 15
    Throughout the postwar history, the arrogant Saxons are afraid of us. Money is wanted by those who twist this hysteria. Do the Russians want war, you ask the silence ... angry
  23. 0
    21 September 2016 11: 34
    "Russia within 2 days is able to deploy its troops on the territory of Great Britain ...". But for some reason it does not unfold. In the background there is still the same cry: "Bubble-ah-ah-ah, dough for military orders !!!!" Old songs about the main thing. To have time to snatch, while the man in the street still believes in something and is afraid of something. And then a couple of years will pass, the image of the enemy will fade and an ordinary taxpayer will ask in surprise: "What the hell, excuse me to feed so many parasites in military uniform?" In general, the impression is that our "partners" have slightly relaxed over the past twenty years, deciding that Russia is already finished and the money allocated for military development has gone into their pockets. As a result, either the newest fighter plane does not fly, or the expensive aircraft carrier does not float. And now we urgently need to make up, and the money is bye-bye.
  24. 0
    21 September 2016 14: 01
    Here is no need for this hatred ...
  25. 0
    21 September 2016 19: 06
    "Kisa, more cynicism, people love it!" The gist of this whole article is "more gold is needed, my lord."
  26. +1
    22 September 2016 06: 22
    something like 1939, when the Poles boldly threw themselves into cavalry attacks against tank columns. In two weeks, nothing was left of them. And here the same option is possible, if you argue hypothetically.
    In 1939, the Poles boldly flew away from the Germans to the neighboring states and gave up their positions no less bravely. It's no joke: 60 thousand have lost from the 3,5 million army! Is it possible with such "huge losses" (about 2%) to continue the resistance of the "civilized" German army? It is only Russian barbarians who are capable of such meanness!
  27. 0
    22 September 2016 11: 21
    When they showed (in the 13th or 14th year) how 150 fighters with equipment from one part of Russia to another were transferred in a day, they were very impressed. And even then they said that if all the same thing happened towards the EU, they would only be able to oppose and react something in a month, but during this time there would simply be nobody to do ... So they are twitching.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"