Military Review

Vladimir Putin: The election results are the response of citizens to attempts at external pressure on Russia

202
Russian President Vladimir Putin commented on the preliminary results of the elections, which suggest that representatives of United Russia will occupy three-quarters of the seats in the State Duma. According to Vladimir Putin, this will of the Russian citizens was one of the answers to external attempts to destabilize the situation in the Russian Federation.


President quotes the news agency Interfax:
The voting results are also the reaction of our citizens to attempts at external pressure on Russia, to threats, sanctions, to attempts to sway the situation in our country from within. Citizens have chosen stability.


At the same time, Vladimir Putin, addressing members of the government, himself expressed a certain surprise with the result of United Russia. According to him, “the question arises how this (the result of the“ ER ”) was achieved against the background of rather large difficulties in the economy and the social sphere, against the background of a well-known decline in real incomes of citizens.”

Vladimir Putin: The election results are the response of citizens to attempts at external pressure on Russia


The President of Russia called on the ministers of the Russian government to listen to the ideas of not only the parliamentary majority party, but also representatives of other political forces that passed to the State Duma following a popular vote. According to him, this is the only way to take into account the interests of citizens and continue the course towards the development of the country.
Photos used:
@PutinRF
202 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. dsm100
    dsm100 19 September 2016 15: 38
    +28
    "The election results are the response of citizens to attempts at external pressure on Russia" ... But what is it really a good answer? It seems to me not. The turnout is low. And then the Communist Party + the Liberal Democratic Party + A Just Russia won together the same number of votes as the United Russia. Half of voters voted against the United Russia. Here is the result.
    1. Marlen
      Marlen 19 September 2016 15: 41
      +30
      I see one result. The people ate the current power. The current government has no stunning success as it was in previous elections.
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 19 September 2016 15: 45
        +35
        Quote: Marlen
        I see one result. The people ate the current power.

        If "the people were fed up with the current government," then the turnout would have been much higher - people would have come out to show their protest to United Russia. And here it turns out that the people are not against the current government ("a bird is better in hand than a pie in the sky") - therefore half of the voters stayed at home. And including me.
        1. Temples
          Temples 19 September 2016 15: 52
          +25
          Marlen
          I see one result. The people ate the current power. The current government has no stunning success as it was in previous elections.

          If we talk about EP then:
          in 2011 the "overwhelming success" is 49,32%
          Now more than 54% of party lists plus single-mandate over two hundred.

          Where are you from ???
          You probably write about Merkel’s grandmother or about black in a white house.
          The fact that your writing is not about Russia is a fact.

          1. dsm100
            dsm100 19 September 2016 15: 58
            +9
            What did you mean. In 2011: United Russia - 64,3%, Communist Party-11,57%, Russian Prospect - 7,74%, LDPR - 8,14%, Apple - 1,59%. Together, they totaled 29,04% !!!
            1. Temples
              Temples 19 September 2016 17: 11
              +15
              For those on the train:
              2011year
              1. United Russia - 49,32%
              2. Communist Party - 19,19%
              3. Fair Russia - 13,24%
              4. LDPR - 11,67%
              5. Apple - 3,43%
              6. Patriots of Russia - 0,97%
              7. Just cause - 0,60%
              The turnout was 60,1%

              dsm100, for YOU and Marlen personally:
              64,3% of EP is 2007.
              By the number of mandates, this election is a record for EP.

              Are you consciously engaged in substitution?
              Revolutionaries? laughing
            2. falcon
              falcon 19 September 2016 17: 11
              +12
              Quote: dsm100
              What did you mean. In 2011: United Russia - 64,3%, Communist Party-11,57%, Russian Prospect - 7,74%, LDPR - 8,14%, Apple - 1,59%. Together, they totaled 29,04% !!!

              Just in this election half of the Duma is elected in single-member constituencies. Result: 343 mandates for EP, for ALL the rest
              parties - 107 seats. That is, on the contrary to the past composition of the Duma
              Now any law can be adopted in the Duma only by voting
              one faction - EP, in view of the constitutional majority.
              1. DimerVladimer
                DimerVladimer 20 September 2016 14: 18
                +3
                It's time to change the constitution and elect the sun-faced president for life and assign him the title of Great Leader and Father of Peoples ...
          2. Marlen
            Marlen 19 September 2016 16: 07
            +2
            Google and find the results of the 2011 elections.
            1. The comment was deleted.
          3. Lelek
            Lelek 19 September 2016 18: 22
            +6
            Quote: Temples
            Where are you from ???


            Yes, don't touch him. All the stinkers who were lying quietly will now raise a shout about illegality, manipulation, harassment and protch. They have it so programmed. "Let the loser cry ...". Smell, feel what pulled, this is the Liberal Democrats stink so. bully
            1. Hell's Angel
              Hell's Angel 20 September 2016 05: 03
              +2
              Yeah! And the planted governors are all liberal democrats (there is only one so far) and the roads of the State Department are being built with CIA agents ...
              1. godun
                godun 20 September 2016 11: 32
                +3
                Yes, and no one remembered that at the preliminary vote, the EDR lost almost everywhere, so they cast votes with a margin, just in case.
          4. ando_bor
            ando_bor 21 September 2016 10: 36
            0
            State Department mercenaries and their brainless victims are present everywhere, including on this site, elections have shown that the people understand this and do not vote for them.
            1. gladcu2
              gladcu2 22 September 2016 14: 47
              0
              Andover

              No need to mess around.

              The State Department has already blocked access to influence.

              Pay attention to the following.
              The party is in power, the professionalism of governing the country is degrading. At least there is no growth.

              Ask yourself a question. Why is state property sold out? What motivates this? Generations were brought to the state, and a party of thieves comes in and shamelessly sells everything.

              Why is the domestic market still unbalanced? Why do salaries not cover sales opportunities? Why repayment of mortgage debt is growing. And it should be at least 5 years. And with modern technological development, the cost of housing for an average employee should be no more than a year of work.

              Why is a party under whose authority only 40% of voters come to the polls? What does it mean? This is not only a manifestation of contempt, it is directly a consequence of the failure of leadership.

              Why did the party to which the most claims suddenly come again to victory?

              I do not care. In Canada, the same problems. One to one. I always thought that even with the Russians, something would work out. All the same. Hopelessly.
        2. dsm100
          dsm100 19 September 2016 15: 53
          +20
          Half of the voters stayed home because maybe they do not believe in an honest vote count. Remember not the previous election was a turnout of 116% or something around that. I personally do not mind United Russia. I see that more than 50% of the vote was not for United Russia. This is a sign for me, I would say there is reason to think.
          1. SRC P-15
            SRC P-15 19 September 2016 16: 11
            +11
            Quote: dsm100
            Half of the voters stayed home because maybe they do not believe in an honest vote count.

            To this I will answer this way: to the unbelieving Anthropus - EP in the ass! Yes
          2. alexng
            alexng 19 September 2016 19: 32
            +5
            The people voted for these 4 parties because of your arrogant American ideology. Liberals in Russia hate you because of your corrupt 90s. And while you exist, the current government is not in danger. The Russian people do not like American and European podstylok and thanks to you, the EP gained so many votes. That's all the arithmetic. You often appear on television - you can't imagine the best anti-advertising for liberals. When you knock your "ginger cat" off the pedestal, then maybe something will change for the better for you. And so on the political living space you are homeless.
            1. karabas-barabas
              karabas-barabas 20 September 2016 23: 21
              0
              Do you keep people for fools? What does the 90s have to do with it, Chubais (a Putin official) and liberals (who exactly are you talking about)? After all, only fools when choosing between candidates were not interested in how they want to stop the theft, inefficient spending of money, develop the economy, force the Duma to become parliament, etc., but how they remembered trolling other candidates, the State Department and how important it is to save Assad. You probably voted for the Korotchenko troll, because he is a real patriot in your eyes! :)
          3. gladcu2
            gladcu2 22 September 2016 15: 25
            0
            DSM 100

            Yes, everything is simply explained.

            50% party rating. 40% did not come to vote. It means that they are against the party in power and do not trust the elections.
            50% -40% = 10%

            10% is the maximum rating of the party in power.

            Remember Comrade Stalin: "it doesn't matter how they vote, it matters who counts."

            10% is less than the Communists. Which, by the way, have revived the country during their 70 years of rule three times. Once from almost absolute zero.

            Once again, trust in the ruling bourgeois party is only 10%.
        3. Gardamir
          Gardamir 19 September 2016 16: 01
          +7
          And then it turns out
          that the people have lost faith.
        4. Alf
          Alf 19 September 2016 17: 46
          +12
          If "the people were fed up with the current government," then the turnout would have been much higher - people would have come out to show their protest to United Russia. And here it turns out that the people are not against the current government ("a bird is better in hand than a pie in the sky") - therefore half of the voters stayed at home.

          Wrong. Here is a quote from the wisest.
          At the same time, Vladimir Putin, addressing members of the government, himself expressed a certain surprise with the result of United Russia. According to him, “the question arises how this (the result of the“ ER ”) was achieved against the background of rather large difficulties in the economy and the social sphere, against the background of a well-known decline in real incomes of citizens.”

          Regarding the first quote.
          People see and understand perfectly well that this regime cannot be blamed. And non-participation in elections is their form of protest.
          On the second quote.
          And why is he surprised if on election day he himself read in the newspaper that homeless people voted on the Square of three stations. How can a homeless person vote if he, in the vast majority, does not have a passport? So one homeless person can vote indefinitely under different names. He was simply told, Man, put a cross here, and we will pour you a glass. Deliver? Put, there is something to hunt. In addition, I dare to recall that it was the EP that introduced the law on the participation in elections of persons without a fixed place of residence, i.e. received an inexhaustible reserve of voters.
          And about the surprise, so I will tell you such a case. In Samara, a mayor was elected several years ago, they tried so hard to ascribe votes to him that in some areas 106% of voters voted for him. And nothing, a ride.
          1. Homo
            Homo 19 September 2016 18: 20
            +10
            Quote: Alf
            People see and understand perfectly well that this regime cannot be blamed.

            The use of the word "regime" speaks of your "falling in love" with Western democracy! negative
            Quote: Alf
            How can a homeless person vote if he, in the vast majority, does not have a passport?

            You will be very surprised to learn that homeless people (not everyone, of course, but many) have not only passports but also pension policies, medical policies, and even bank accounts. hi
            Quote: Alf
            He was simply told, Man, put a cross here, and we will pour you a glass.

            You don't know well the Moscow homeless people. Not all the herd of drunks. Some of them have an education that professors will envy. More than 40% of Moscow homeless people are people who were "thrown" into the dashing 90s. People returning from their dacha, vacation, business trip, hospital learned that they were now homeless. request
            And your approach to this information indicates a bias towards power. Another spit in power, without reason! No.
            1. St Petrov
              St Petrov 19 September 2016 18: 23
              +3
              People see and understand very well that this regime cannot be blamed


              it is necessary to "bring down" such authors and then the mode will be fine)
              1. avia1991
                avia1991 19 September 2016 19: 13
                +9
                Quote: s-t Petrov
                it is necessary to "blame" such authors

                It looks like, you have a sweet life, "sergeant" .. Do you have something against the freedom to express your opinion? So then you did not guess at birth: you had to be born 80 years earlier. hi
                1. St Petrov
                  St Petrov 19 September 2016 21: 14
                  +3
                  I see how life is for those who dumped red)

                  Does he have something against the regime of my state? Well, let him tell his wife in the kitchen, or go to the GUU or at least do something, and not incite to "cut the cut" on the media resource. such boulders on the censor should sit, spread rot

                  Nothing, nothing. At all times, there were such dreamers as freedom-loving TS who shouted until they thought that they were not serfs, but personalities. As a result, at all times after their bacchanalia they were waiting for scaffold. So when you do not come into the world, at first such people go whining about cutting, and then either hang out on the block of the state, or on the block of the revolution

                  There is one outcome. chopping block)

                  And all because the gopher refused to face the truth and understand his role in this world. Gopher thought he was a person and the world revolves around him.
                  1. karabas-barabas
                    karabas-barabas 20 September 2016 23: 28
                    0
                    You want to consider yourself a gopher, consider it, and for those who consider themselves to be barrages, and not gophers, or sheep, you shouldn’t shut your mouth here.
              2. Alf
                Alf 19 September 2016 19: 45
                +5
                it is necessary to "bring down" such authors and then the mode will be fine)

                Come to Samara, then we'll see who will dump someone.
                1. St Petrov
                  St Petrov 19 September 2016 21: 21
                  +2
                  it’s you, the shuttlei rezhIMa will reach here to Moscow, through the Moscow Region and the Dzerzhinsky division on the Ring Road. So let's not rush to call me to Samara.

                  We are adults. If destined. And if the shutteliers pull themselves up here, I hope fate will help me to be in the right place at the right time and I will be on the side of riot police and kindness to participate in a civil dispute through blood, so as not to allow what I saw in '14

                  I will help the state than I can. =]
                  1. St Petrov
                    St Petrov 19 September 2016 21: 28
                    +1
                    appeal to local opposition:

                    Cutter!

                    Didn't you reel in 1996? Now why are you crowing?


                    Living worse than steel? You have a lot of obscenities) It’s time to introduce censorship in the state, like the one on the site. And for the written start asking



                  2. avia1991
                    avia1991 19 September 2016 22: 30
                    +13
                    Quote: s-t Petrov
                    I will on the side of riot police and good take part in a civil dispute
                    Sergeant, these are two inconsistent concepts! You didn’t mix anything up?
                    Try to search the Internet for information about the dispersal of the rally in Vladik 5 years ago? The Moscow OMON "distinguished itself" well there - because the local refused to mutilate peaceful and unarmed people. And people just wanted the enterprises to stop going bankrupt and sell fish catch quotas to the Japs!
                    So you’ll be more careful with your allies - God forbid, you yourself will fall under a hot hand.
                    As for the "march on Moscow" - Moscow has long been living in isolation from real Russia. How can you discuss what you have no idea about?
                    1. Letnab
                      Letnab 20 September 2016 03: 03
                      +1
                      It was like that, only the reason is a little different ..
                      Quote:
                      Recall that on weekends, December 20-21, two large unauthorized rallies of motorists took place in Vladivostok.

                      More details: http://www.newsru.com/russia/19jan2009/otkazalis.
                      html
                    2. Greenwood
                      Greenwood 20 September 2016 05: 46
                      +3
                      The rallies in Vlad were mainly due to a sharp increase in import duties on Japanese cars, which sharply hit the automotive business in the city, and the city’s economy was largely dependent on this. The authorities, of course, acted like a pig, drove riot police from the Moscow region when the local refused to participate. As a result, the protesters, and just passers-by, and even foreign journalists with expensive equipment, were injured.
                      1. St Petrov
                        St Petrov 20 September 2016 18: 53
                        0
                        and even foreign journalists with expensive equipment.


                        Well this is really a disaster. I don’t know directly. a stingy tear flowed down my cheeks
                    3. St Petrov
                      St Petrov 20 September 2016 10: 30
                      +1
                      Riot police passed through the Caucasus. He climbed under the bullets so that later on the forum I would read such rubbish? Rally covered unauthorized? That's right.

                      And for those who are afraid of riot police and do not respect the work of guys - well then - be afraid and do not respect - whine further.

                      I think the guys are not very saddened by the fact of this

                      +)

                      when the local refused to participate


                      Did the unit refuse to comply with the order? Well, this is the corresponding article

                      As a result, protesters and passers-by just passing by


                      for not a bad one. And do not tell me about
                      bestowed on running a car business in the city


                      Auto business. Yeah. He drove a drowned man on a ferry from Japan and resold - truly business to all businesses.

                      1. St Petrov
                        St Petrov 20 September 2016 10: 39
                        +1
                        the VO website has arrived, blessed grandmother tells me one thing about riot police, which extinguishes people in the country (how can she know that riot police and all opera (do you think garbage is?)) went through the Caucasus (both companies) - and it’s another matter to listen to it from an officer Air Force - from a man wearing epaulettes and also following the orders of the state.

                        Some hell)

                        Akhidzhakova may say so, but not officers and military personnel

                        The auto business has bent over. The car business is not in Vladivostok - but in Tolyatti.

                        In Vladivostok, the resale of Japanese technology by local hucksters, which, God forbid, make up 2% of the city’s population.

                        And hucksters with the most honest eyes started having problems?

                        By catch maybe. But now the state’s priority is food policy. And an unauthorized rally certainly will not help anything.

                      2. Greenwood
                        Greenwood 20 September 2016 14: 06
                        +3
                        Oh my God. I sincerely hope that people with such thinking as yours are a minority in Russia.
                        Quote: s-t Petrov
                        Rally covered unauthorized?
                        It was a rally, not pogroms, riots, etc. People stood peacefully in the square, some led a round dance around the Christmas tree. And what, it was necessary to beat them with all the dope with batons, to throw them face on the asphalt and push them in auto-kicks with kicks ?!
                        Quote: s-t Petrov
                        Did the unit refuse to comply with the order?
                        That's right and done. Why indulge the idiocy of the federal government. Especially because of cars. In Vlada at that time, both the cops and almost all government agencies traveled to the right-handed Japanese.
                        Quote: s-t Petrov
                        He drove a drowned man on a ferry from Japan and resold - truly business to all businesses.
                        Do not know the essence of the matter, do not write nonsense. No one drove the drowned here. These are all myths prevalent in Western Russia.
                    4. godun
                      godun 20 September 2016 11: 52
                      +2
                      Judging by the inconsistent speech and aggressive rhetoric of the guy with spermotoxicosis, or, alternatively, such people either stand at the feeding trough, or mom and dad are sitting on the neck, and therefore they have no claims to power.
                      1. St Petrov
                        St Petrov 20 September 2016 18: 00
                        0
                        Greenwood,

                        It was a rally, not pogroms, riots, etc. People stood peacefully in the square, some led a round dance around the Christmas tree. And what, it was necessary to beat them with all the dope with batons, to throw them face on the asphalt and push them in auto-kicks with kicks ?!


                        give an example of a country in which an unauthorized rally is not dispersed

                        I’ll tell you so - face in the asphalt for disobedience to the authorities - the lesser of evils.

                        And you don’t have to build a virgin out of yourself saying that people just stood. People violated the law when they gathered at an unauthorized rally.

                        We already have the opposition learned this rule, but there were boobies who put it on the LAW.

                        therefore, the boobies were legally poked in the face with asphalt. Everything is elementary

                        The Gabonians also at one time simply went out to stand in pots on their heads - and then they told the whole world how they simply stood, and then the bloody Yanykovich sent his golden eagle to extinguish children

                      2. St Petrov
                        St Petrov 20 September 2016 18: 03
                        0
                        guy has sperm toxicosis


                        I will not use your services. you can go further. there’s probably a lot of people who you can treat him with.

                        Claims to power? Well, not on the forum, I will speak their claims.

                        When I have a specific complaint and it can be resolved by a specific official - I become a thorn in his life) Fortunately, letters can go where you need through the Internet. Many officials and even the deputy transport minister were already in touch with me. And he did solve my question and his secretary called me back to ask how things were going +)
                        It seems a trifle - but nice.

                        I do not give a ride on my neck if I need something, and the official is not going to move and do his job

                        Well, so far I have not encountered such insoluble problems apparently, unlike you.

                        The ruble exchange rate is unpleasant. But. I work at work and coming home - I work part-time at home. I have the opportunity to help parents go to sea and not whine about the ruble. It’s hard - but not offended and I’m not begging.

            2. Lelek
              Lelek 19 September 2016 18: 26
              +1
              Quote: Homo
              You will be very surprised to learn that homeless people (not everyone, of course, but many) have not only passports but also pension policies, medical policies, and even bank accounts.


              A homeless person is a way of life and many of this population category like him. Well, they (homeless people) made their choice, and the rest of them, like everyone else. Yes
              1. Homo
                Homo 19 September 2016 19: 33
                +2
                Quote: Lelek
                A homeless person is a way of life and many of this population category like him. Well, they (homeless people) made their choice, and the rest of them, like everyone else.

                A homeless person is a forced state, often by the will of circumstances. Homeless people, for whom this lifestyle is as much as other representatives of humanity adhering to an unconventional lifestyle (hermits, hippies, sectarians, etc.)! hi
              2. Uncle Murzik
                Uncle Murzik 20 September 2016 07: 43
                0
                something in the USSR I don’t remember that such a way of life was liked by such a large population! belay
                1. Homo
                  Homo 20 September 2016 15: 06
                  0
                  Quote: Uncle Murzik
                  something in the USSR I don’t remember that such a way of life was liked by such a large population!

                  This is what?
              3. gladcu2
                gladcu2 22 September 2016 15: 42
                +1
                Lelek

                Under the USSR there were no homeless people.

                Do you know why? Because the state really worked, and did not give a choice.

                If a person is seriously mentally ill, then in a closed institution. If partially, then in a boarding school with the opportunity to work. There was no unemployment. Anyone could find a job, just go to the factory entrance and tell the guard that you are looking for work and you need a personnel department. And the next day you could come and do the work. Which covers your life needs. I mean the case when in order to go to work, you do not need to ask for money at the bank.
            3. Iline
              Iline 19 September 2016 18: 46
              +8
              Quote: Homo
              Another spit in power, without reason! no

              Real disposable cash incomes of the population of the Russian Federation in August fell by 8,3% in annual terms after a 7,3% decrease in updated data in July, 4,8% in June, 6,2% in May, and 7,1% in April, by 1,3% in March, by 4,3% in February and 5,8% in January, the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) reported on Monday.
              In my opinion, this power spits in the people. The main thing is stable ....
              1. Homo
                Homo 19 September 2016 19: 35
                +1
                Quote: Iline
                Real disposable cash incomes of the population of the Russian Federation in August fell by 8,3% in annual terms after a 7,3% decrease in updated data in July, 4,8% in June, 6,2% in May, and 7,1% in April, by 1,3% in March, by 4,3% in February and 5,8% in January, the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) reported on Monday.
                In my opinion, this power spits in the people. The main thing is stable ....

                Blah blah blah. And what does this have to do with talking about homeless people, about the use by the authorities of the votes of homeless people? request Do not leave the topic of conversation.
                1. gladcu2
                  gladcu2 22 September 2016 15: 46
                  0
                  Why should the ruling party use the homeless?

                  That example is unsuccessful. Knowing in advance that the turnout of citizens will not be 100%, the votes of those who did not appear were accrued by those who organized these elections. And organized - the ruling party.

                  Now wait for the sale of state property.
          2. Kite
            Kite 19 September 2016 19: 48
            +2
            Quote: Alf
            ..... on election day, he himself read in the newspaper that on the Square of the three stations, the homeless voted ....

            What kind of newspaper was that, remember?
            The old grannies at the entrances with modern newspapers are not competitors in the spread of fictions. While reading, remember this and do not spread their exhausts from the "rectum" (what should be with the convolutions, some straightened up and the food receiver began to work in reverse)
            1. Alf
              Alf 19 September 2016 20: 55
              0
              What kind of newspaper was that, remember?

              Or Moscow Komsomolets or Komsomol. Sunday evening. You can search.
              1. Homo
                Homo 19 September 2016 23: 05
                0
                Quote: Alf
                Or Moscow Komsomolets or Komsomol.

                So "Komsomolskaya Pravda" has long become a "yellow press"! wink
                1. Alf
                  Alf 19 September 2016 23: 54
                  0
                  So "Komsomolskaya Pravda" has long become a "yellow press"!

                  Accepted. And which press is not yellow right now?
          3. Aleksander
            Aleksander 20 September 2016 06: 18
            0
            Quote: Alf
            . How can a homeless person vote if he, in the vast majority, no passport ? So one homeless person can vote indefinitely under different names. They just said to him, Man, put a cross here, and we’ll pour you a glass

            What nonsense! Well, why go somewhere and still ask an UNPASSPORT person to put a cross under different names? What prevents the petitioner from doing this "under different names" much faster and easier and without any glass?

            PS comedians received a crushing defeat-minus 60% of places in the Duma! There they belong ...
        5. Rom14
          Rom14 19 September 2016 18: 01
          +6
          So, because of people like YOU, the "oligarchs" are running the show again ...
          1. SRC P-15
            SRC P-15 19 September 2016 18: 17
            +7
            Quote: Rom14
            So, because of people like YOU, the "oligarchs" are running the show again ..

            And because of people like you, would Navalny run the ball with the Kasyanovs and Kasparovs driven?
      2. dauria
        dauria 19 September 2016 15: 51
        +13
        The current government has no stunning success as it was in previous elections.


        What are you talking about?
        As a result of the vote, United Russia received 343 mandates
        For comparison, according to the results of the elections in 2011, United Russia received 238 mandates.

        But the turnout is low, well, it’s because no one saw a real threat like beloletochniki (as then). There is absolutely no need for this government to compose something. They passed easily without difficulty. And the manual "opposition" is also needed, at least for the sake of appearance.
      3. Iskander Sh
        Iskander Sh 19 September 2016 15: 52
        +8
        Quote: Marlen
        The current government has no stunning success as it was in previous elections.


        That success was the result of a brazen vote-up. There 60% did not smell, even VTsIOM talked about ~ 50%. Yes, and now they’ve screwed 50%, it’s just arrived, admin. the resource due to lazy asses was huge.
        1. St Petrov
          St Petrov 19 September 2016 15: 56
          +6
          admin. the resource due to lazy asses was huge.


          if only someone would fit the resource to your brain
        2. Marlen
          Marlen 19 September 2016 15: 59
          +3
          I fully support
      4. marl
        marl 19 September 2016 16: 15
        +20
        Quote: Marlen
        I see one result. The people ate the current power.

        People ate liberal nonsense and felt that they were not looking for good from good.
        Searched already in the 90s, found only adventure on their ... head.
      5. drunkram
        drunkram 21 September 2016 13: 23
        0
        It just does mean that the majority are satisfied with the situation in the country (those who did not come + those who voted for EP, that’s all) And I think it’s right
    2. Bloodsucker
      Bloodsucker 19 September 2016 15: 47
      +29
      Dear, I would not put the PLUS sign between the three parties against EP, the Liberal Democratic Party pulled by the ears, as a counterweight to the Communist Party and as one of the main props of the EP. CP-does not count, this is a vanishing quasi-party.

      “At the same time, Vladimir Putin, addressing the members of the government, himself expressed a certain surprise at the result of United Russia. According to him,“ the question arises as to how this (the result of United Russia) was achieved against the background of sufficiently large difficulties in the economy and social sphere, against the background of the well-known decrease in real incomes of citizens "- Indeed, Crimea alone is not enough for such a result.


      But the prices for housing and communal services, the rise in prices for goods, the same OSAGO, fuels and lubricants, is more than enough, not to mention the juvenile, essentially disgusting education and medicine after all the reforms, which would have turned out that the EP suddenly, with such a score "won" At the same time, it is absolutely clear that all the party members of the liberal wing such as PornoAss and Rost, Civil Platforms and other things are not accepted by the absolute majority of the population.
      In general, this time, the EP got out only and only because it used the image of the President as a shield against the dissatisfaction of the population.

      Well, the choice was made, as it was, now it’s just for some, from among A) who were not in the elections, B) who voted for Ep, C) for the liberal, D) quasi-parties, you should not moan loudly in social networks, queues and in the kitchens, that they live badly, CHOOSE - chew do not choke.
      1. andrew42
        andrew42 19 September 2016 18: 57
        +6
        I support. I am especially in agreement that since 1994 the Liberal Democratic Party has been a party initially charged with extinguishing protest sentiments by selecting votes from the Communist Party. The current "red screams hum" from Volfovich, - "We are for RUSSKIIIIIIH !!" and "KPRF for OLIGARKHOV" (yes, that's right, "KPRF is an oligarchy of fat cats", you heard right) - and this is a classic of the "party-steam outlet" genre. So, in fact, in Russia today (as before) there are 3 political forces: 1) Pro-Western-dermocratic (PARNAS, Yablochki, etc.), moreover, pretty deflated, not like in the old days of e-hegei of the 90s. 2) National-bourgeois in the person of United Russia plus "permanent staff service" in the form of the Liberal Democratic Party, and "temporary service" (under the contract) in the form of Spravorossi, and earlier "Rodina" played there once. A powerful bloc that sent the "Westerners" into oblivion. But for a banal reason - the "facade" of the eaten-up territory must still be painted, and besides, tyrit strictly according to the rank, preferably without being taken abroad, otherwise physical protection tends to zero, and you understand that ... they come, they will take ... 3) Well, and the third force is the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, which could become a powerful alternative with its socialist principles, but the trouble is, they cannot refuse the "mummy", let alone recognize the genocide of the Russian people in 1917-1928 and will not be separated from the very "first Council of People's Commissars". There are essentially no more forces. The next "batch of retirees" or "Lovers of port" - of course, does not count.
    3. Ivan Tucha
      Ivan Tucha 19 September 2016 15: 50
      +16
      I did not go to the polls. But, a little watched the progress of the election race. The only party that did not discuss other parties and did not poke a finger into them digging in de..e is EP. And in this behavior lies the confidence, calculation and strength of EP. No other party offers ANY real, not utopian steps. The population implicitly knows who will win and, in principle, is not against it - for stability, with all the minuses of the current situation, is better than the new derban. Hence the low turnout. If the position of EP were weaker, the turnout would be greater and in favor of the same EP. Plus, of course, every sane person objectively understands that the situation has not yet been reversed. If the ruling party manages to squeeze to the nail thieves, newly-born kings and boyars, who have bastardized the others, it is better to be indicative and to the full extent (and not like with Vasilyeva) then EP will be invincible for many years to come.
      1. dmi.pris1
        dmi.pris1 19 September 2016 16: 04
        +32
        Dear. And the ruling party is the kings and boyars, factory directors and heads of large companies, who are bastardized by permissiveness, thieves and bureaucrats are overgrown. I do not say that in other parties everything in chocolate is the same, less bureaucrats. And then, call please where and when did you read the EP program, and is there anyway? Just do not need about import substitution, this thesis starts to become obsolete like a mammoth mammoth.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Bloodsucker
        Bloodsucker 19 September 2016 16: 29
        +10
        Answer the question why the leader of United Russia, Medvedev, did not deign, according to the Election Rules, to go out to at least one direct debate with representatives of other parties?
        Probably because "there is no money, but you are holding on", everything was decided by VTsIOM on September 15, when he threw off a figure in the society that coincided almost with the one that we have seen since the morning of 19 ..
        But this, this is our successor to the wizard Churov
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRHzYTR_vyA
        Since she is terribly surprised like this ..... EP ..... and suddenly such numbers.
        Such videos now, by the rampart, of facts of direct falsehood in bulk, and speaking about honesty, alas, but clearly, not fair.
        For Brezhnev’s stability, as soon as they didn’t go out, say oh, stagnation, ah, swamp, so if you compare that time and this, alas, it will not be in favor, at the expense of stability of poverty and tranquility and confidence in that era, although of course , something because of Leni Brezhnev happened in the 90th, if he didn’t sleep at the post and left in 1972-75 ....
      4. avia1991
        avia1991 19 September 2016 22: 42
        +1
        Quote: Ivan Tucha
        No other party offers NO real, non-utopian steps

        Two questions, with your permission:
        1. WHAT REAL STEPS (only specifically, without common phrases) does EP offer?
        2. PROGRAMS OF WHICH PARTIES Have you personally compared, or even read, in order to indiscriminately assert their utopianism?
    4. BARKAS
      BARKAS 19 September 2016 15: 50
      0
      Quote: dsm100
      . Half of the voters voted against United Russia. Here is the result.

      And what's bad or necessary, like in Chechnya, is almost 100%.
      1. dsm100
        dsm100 19 September 2016 16: 03
        +2
        I did not say that it is bad. I say that the result is very interesting and I would say that this is the first bell for the current government. I repeat, I am not against any party. I just analyze the election results. Unless of course they are honest. Do not be surprised if the results are actually different.
        1. Komisare
          Komisare 19 September 2016 22: 30
          +1
          The actual results on exit polls are different.

          Putin himself is surprised between the lines
          "How do you still continue to vote for the EP?" laughing
    5. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog 19 September 2016 16: 01
      0
      3/4 is a damn 75% as the Communist Party and the Liberal Democratic Party and others scored the same ??? You have a respected math and logic is very bad !!!
      1. dsm100
        dsm100 19 September 2016 16: 10
        +1
        What 3/4 are we talking about? What are you talking about?
        1. Alex_Rarog
          Alex_Rarog 19 September 2016 17: 17
          +1
          Russian President Vladimir Putin commented on the preliminary results of the elections, which suggest that representatives of United Russia will occupy three-quarters of the seats in the State Duma. According to Vladimir Putin, this will of the Russian citizens was one of the answers to external attempts to destabilize the situation in the Russian Federation.
    6. Berber
      Berber 19 September 2016 16: 17
      +7
      Half of the rating in ED RO is Putin's merit. And the turnout is low because, the swamp. Corruption from the upper echelons. Has anyone encountered the judicial system in controversial cases? Loot is everything. Judges resolve issues through lawyers. And so it is everywhere.
      1. dsm100
        dsm100 19 September 2016 16: 26
        +2
        I totally agree.
      2. dmi.pris1
        dmi.pris1 19 September 2016 16: 53
        +6
        Evgeny Ruzhanovich. I would also add an information policy during the year before the election. We probably noticed how internal problems went, if not by the wayside, then into the third. All Ukraine, Syria, butting in the international arena .. But what about us? It's all in chocolate ? Yes, only among the elect. Inside the country there is no development program, just some kind of backstage games, sharing the booty ..
      3. Temples
        Temples 19 September 2016 17: 02
        +3
        People who are dissatisfied with the election, except for the whining of the same type, that everything is bad and everything around the tsar’s thieves from EP has something to offer?
        One continuous whining offended.

        Do you want adventures on your ass ?, so Ukraine is at hand.
        What to grumble for a living?

        The vast majority voted for stability.
        Most supported the foreign policy.

        And inside the country, I repeat, we need stability.
        1. Alf
          Alf 19 September 2016 17: 54
          +3
          And inside the country, I repeat, we need stability.

          And where is stability? The economy is getting worse and worse. Prices are rising for no reason.
          1. St Petrov
            St Petrov 19 September 2016 17: 59
            +3
            Prices are rising for no reason.


            Is EP guilty?) Kremlin? Putin?)

            or a huckster resale neighbor?
            1. Alf
              Alf 19 September 2016 18: 13
              +8
              or a huckster resale neighbor?

              And who allows the huckster to raise prices? This same huckster acts within the framework of the laws that the EP pushed through.
              1. St Petrov
                St Petrov 19 September 2016 18: 18
                +1
                We have capitalism for over 20 years. How do you live in a vacuum?

                Or do you suggest that the state engage in pricing? We already have problems with entrepreneurship, reading you, I understand that it could be even worse

                1. andrew42
                  andrew42 19 September 2016 19: 03
                  +6
                  Well, well, still tell the bike about capitalism without state regulation. It seems that they fell asleep in 1994 and woke up in 2014. Give an example, WHERE did something develop in Russia without state participation? (Please put Kaspersky and the service sector aside - we need REAL and MATERIAL assets).
                  1. St Petrov
                    St Petrov 19 September 2016 21: 35
                    0
                    Now specifically it was about prices in a stall for food and essential goods, at which the seller sets prices

                    1. Bloodsucker
                      Bloodsucker 19 September 2016 22: 25
                      +3
                      Petrov ... again .. as a matter of substance, are you immediately blown away, there are no answers to questions in the training manual?
                      1. St Petrov
                        St Petrov 20 September 2016 10: 47
                        0
                        Give an example, WHERE in Russia something has developed without state participation


                        if we are now discussing stalls and small shops - then believe me they are developing not thanks to state participation, but contrary to

                        But to understand this you need your own store or small business.

                        And if the state comes now and sets the prices, then people will close their small business, because it will become more difficult to pay all taxes, pay all communications and stay afloat

                        Well, when people begin to protest against the closure of stalls, shops and so on - the bloodsucker will come out to the square and start screaming - about Gods, the state is strangling businessmen, all the stalls have been closed, until ?!

        2. Starik72
          Starik72 19 September 2016 18: 15
          +3
          Temples. You will steadily spread rot. Do you need such stability? And the foreign policy course has nothing to do with it. The only thing is my opinion, people simply believed Putin that in the internal issue he would achieve such successes as in foreign policy issues.
          1. GYGOLA
            GYGOLA 19 September 2016 19: 33
            0
            , this is my opinion, people simply believed Putin that in the internal issue he would achieve such successes as in foreign policy issues.
            I also think so, they believed it, but with a warning (less than 50% turnout). And to expect something more from him, for people than in 16 years is not smart ... During this time, 2 programs for the people (the army does not count) : Utilization of the old car fleet (increase in fuel sales in the country) and maternal capital (increase in fertility) are all ... During the time of Yeltsin, a joke went:
            There is EBN along the red square, towards the old beggar:
            -Give, for God's sake ...
            -You, mother ... How can I give you, I have neither a racket, nor a ball ...
        3. Bloodsucker
          Bloodsucker 19 September 2016 18: 57
          +6
          Quote: Temples
          Do you want adventures on your ass ?, so Ukraine is at hand.
          What to grumble for a living?

          Khramov, Khramov ... who is the one who is preparing the same torment as in Ruin, these are those whom you are taking under protection. Otherwise, what is the name of their domestic policy in which life does not get better?
          Quote: Temples
          The vast majority voted for stability.
          Most supported the foreign policy.

          Since when, from 100% of eligible voters, 20% has become a majority?
          Quote: Temples
          And inside the country, I repeat, we need stability.

          The greatest stability in the cemetery, did you seriously believe that the country needed just such stability, and not DEVELOPMENT? What does it mean the DEVELOPMENT of society, and not the floundering in the swamp of liberal dreams of the erovskaya quasi-majority?
          Who is supposed to be deceived by the fact that the liberals are the only and only all these pissmen such as Pornoasses and other apple bits? If the EP policy is the same for the population, only slightly dusted with patriotic sauce?
          The country needs DEVELOPMENT, and this is factories and factories, this is the Academy and research institutes, this is transport and space, new medicine and classical education-WHAT EP offers? Nothing.
          Stability in pulling away, the key to success of ER. Examples of darkness, from Geiser to Khoroshavin, Serdyukov and others, is your stability ??
        4. Rastas
          Rastas 20 September 2016 01: 01
          0
          Mr. Khramov, stability to which EdRo leads, is more like stability in a cemetery. By the way, the corpse is thermodynamically most stable. So, while calling for stability, you should at least think that you are investing in this concept. Russia needs development, not slow decay.
    7. GSH-18
      GSH-18 19 September 2016 16: 42
      +2
      Quote: dsm100
      . And then the Communist Party + LDPR + Fair Russia scored together as many votes as Ed. Russia. Half of the voters voted against United Russia.

      Which is half ??? Come on my friend. On Yandex, look at the final figures on the composition of the future parliament - 343 United Russia, 42 komunyaki and 39 LDP
      The composition, after all, depends not only on party lists, but also on single-mandate constituencies.
    8. stas
      stas 19 September 2016 21: 00
      0
      Whatever the victory of EP,
      But Smoked again washed, not contentment of his attempts in Russia did not cause.
      And political competition is necessary so that dizziness from success does not occur.
  2. win
    win 19 September 2016 15: 40
    +6
    The voting results are also the reaction of our citizens to attempts external pressure on Russia, threats, sanctions


    Obama calls Merkel:
    - How about introducing a new sanctions package?
    - First, I should consult with my specialists.
    - And what do your economists say?
    “And they advise meteorologists to consult: suddenly the winter will be cold ...”
  3. Engineer
    Engineer 19 September 2016 15: 41
    +6
    Vladimir Putin: The election results are the response of citizens to attempts at external pressure on Russia

    Yeah, especially on the part of Muscovites and St. Petersburg, a significant answer turned out
  4. Air defense SSH
    Air defense SSH 19 September 2016 15: 42
    +4
    One cannot understand Russia wisely ... And the more Westerners cannot understand it, the greater the pressure and interference from outside, the more united are people in Russia around the country - good or bad, around their own. As soon as the Leberasts and the Americans began to harass Putin, his ratings immediately took off ... Also with EP
  5. Stas Snezhin
    Stas Snezhin 19 September 2016 15: 45
    +4
    And I did not go to vote.
    It’s worth it ..
    1. Iskander Sh
      Iskander Sh 19 September 2016 16: 02
      +17
      Well done voted for EP! It is necessary to deprive people who do not vote the right to vote. The realities of power are built on your indifference.

      How can you achieve democratic changes if the majority thinks "let the boyars decide, and our house is on the edge." And then they sit and wonder why that power has me.
      1. Stas Snezhin
        Stas Snezhin 19 September 2016 16: 13
        0
        But I had a wonderful weekend in the forest,
        and cut mushrooms for pickling ..
    2. Stas Snezhin
      Stas Snezhin 19 September 2016 16: 44
      +3
      By the way, quote:
      In the Pskov region, in the district No. 19, candidates for the regional Assembly of Deputies in the total gained more than 137% of the vote, according to the CEC.

      Yablochnitsa Lyubov Gerasimova gained 7,47% of the vote, Zhirinovets Vladimir Grechin 10,14%, United Russia Alexander Kotov 66,49%, Communist Nikolai Matveev 12,92%.

      Also on the list is candidate Aleksey Fedorov, who collected 40,91% of the vote, the Pskov Province writes. In total, over 137% of voters voted for the candidates.


      From here: www.rosbalt.ru/russia/2016/09/19/1551341.html
  6. Buffet
    Buffet 19 September 2016 15: 46
    +11
    Even Putin was surprised at the results. Like, generally, the elections were rigged without brakes.
  7. romandostalo
    romandostalo 19 September 2016 15: 52
    +1
    I wonder wildly, and how many percent came to the polls?
    1. Iskander Sh
      Iskander Sh 19 September 2016 15: 54
      +1
      50% or so. Few came to the people
      1. weksha50
        weksha50 19 September 2016 16: 22
        +1
        romandostalo Today, 15:52 PM New
        I wonder wildly, and how many percent came to the polls?
        romandostalo
        0 Iskander W Today, 15:54 ↑ New
        50% or so. Few came to the people


        According to today's morning data of the Central Election Commission, the turnout yesterday amounted to 47,8% ... The lowest in recent Russian history ...
        Source: http://topre.ru/2016/09/19/yavka-na-vibori-v-gosu
        darstvennuyu-dumu-stala-samoy-nizkoy.html
        That is, even half of the voters did not vote ...

        Correctly, some forum users say that if someone does not go to the polls, then let them not ache ...
        Although we choose the worst - somewhat better, and not the best - even better ...
        1. gray smeet
          gray smeet 19 September 2016 16: 34
          +12
          They sat out at home, did not vote, and the time will come and they will scream - I did not vote for this power! If only they went to vote, for decency ..... so that they would not later say that your vote was unlawfully cast by the EP, otherwise you would not vote for them in your life ... Those who did not go, did not vote - let them sit and they keep quiet - their business is on the side, everything will be decided for them, but they will give a voice - poke their faces into the dirt - under the title "I did not go to the polls."
          1. vovanpain
            vovanpain 19 September 2016 20: 56
            +11
            Quote: gray smeet
            They sat out at home, did not vote, and the time will come and they will scream - I did not vote for this power! If only they went to vote, for decency ..... so that they would not later say that your vote was unlawfully cast by the EP, otherwise you would not vote for them in your life ... Those who did not go, did not vote - let them sit and they keep quiet - their business is on the side, everything will be decided for them, but they will give a voice - poke their faces into the dirt - under the title "I did not go to the polls."

            Colleague, you have a huge plus, oh, how many lovers wave their fists after the fight, and sitting at the computer with a cup of coffee or a glass of beer, and tearing your ass off the couch and going to vote who they think is necessary, it’s not worth moaning now, otherwise the people voted with their feet, low turnout is a warning, we believe that interest was rigged, and so on, not all of them are of course, but I will always respect the position of the person who voted for EdRo, although I voted for the Communist Party (comment below) because he came and voted and expressed his position than those who proceeding here in the comments with anger, but were too lazy to tear your ass off the couch and go express your position. Regards, colleague. hi
      2. woron333444
        woron333444 19 September 2016 19: 20
        +2
        it’s not enough in Moscow, and on the periphery, before lunch, the lines were
        1. Kahlan amnell
          Kahlan amnell 19 September 2016 21: 57
          +3
          The whole family went to 8.00 (and then the queues, and household chores) and what do you think? There was already a queue. Also "early birds".
  8. Odysseus
    Odysseus 19 September 2016 15: 58
    +7
    It was clear to any reasonable person who understood how the elections were arranged that the EP would get the majority, the only question was whether it would be absolute. And here the low turnout plus the ultimate disappointment of citizens in the officially "opposition" parties did their job. And the single-mandate constituencies (where almost 100% of the local bosses win) completed this business.
    Of the curious moments, I note the complete failure of the "liberals" (that is, pro-American parties), with money and huge support in the media, they collectively scored little more than the alternative Communists of Russia (without money and with zero promotion).
    You can also note the final fiasco of the CP-apparently the presidential administration will reformat or close this project.
    Now two points are important
    1) The plan of the Americans for the elections -2018. Apparently, the stake will be placed on the revolution of the "elites" against Putin. But the question is where they get the "infantry". The liberals have big problems with the infantry. Yes, and the elites are either fed or controlled.
    2) The failure of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation will cause another attempt to remove Zyuganov. For the Presidential Administration, control over the Communist Party is an important asset, so the battle for "Comrade Zyu" will be serious.
    1. Was mammoth
      Was mammoth 19 September 2016 17: 50
      +5
      Quote: Odyssey
      Of the curious moments, I note the complete failure of the "liberals" (that is, pro-American parties), with money and huge support in the media, they collectively scored little more than the alternative Communists of Russia (without money and with zero promotion).

      Here you are a little wrong. wink All real serious liberals have long been in the "United Russia". Yes, and Putin has said more than once that he is a liberal. So, the center of United Russia has long been shifted to the right. Those liberals whom you mean are simply removed from the trough in their time. And, they need it, to the trough. That's the whole difference between the two branches of liberals
      1. Odysseus
        Odysseus 19 September 2016 21: 16
        +2
        Quote: There was a mammoth
        And, they need it, to the feeder. That’s the whole difference between the two branches of liberals

        As for the feeder, I agree, but in general it is a little more complicated.
        Both "liberal" Yeltsin and "liberal" Putin have nothing to do with the ideology of liberalism. And that is why I put the word liberal in quotation marks.
        The fact is that the changed part of the late Soviet nomenklatura in the early 90s adopted the names of "democrats" and "liberals" as an ideological cover. And then, in the late 90s, when it finally became clear that the "course of reforms" had completely failed, and most importantly it became clear that the West does not see "new Russians" as junior partners, they changed their mask and from "liberal Westernizers" became "patriots", since it became clear that what was stolen had to be protected not only from their own people, but also from the West. Russia.
        Those of the "liberals" who retained their orientation towards the West retained their old name (mask). Plus, they were joined by those from the "party of power" who fell out of the cage and broke away from the trough (like Kasyanov).
  9. Rostov 2016
    Rostov 2016 19 September 2016 16: 01
    +2
    If the elections influenced something then, then the people would go. And so everyone understands that this is all fiction and do not want to feel like fools in this performance.
    “And you, Comrade Stalin, what do you think of this issue?” “Ah,” says Comrade Stalin, “on which particular question?” (Indeed, a lot of questions were raised). Kamenev. trying to get down to the level of Stalin, he says: "But on the question of how to win a majority in the party." “You know, comrades,” says Stalin, “what I think about this: I believe that it does not matter who and how to vote in the party; but here is what
    extremely important, it is who and how will count the votes. ”
    1. gray smeet
      gray smeet 19 September 2016 16: 43
      +5
      Quote: Rostov2016
      If the elections influenced something then, then the people would go. And so everyone understands that this is all fiction and do not want to feel like fools in this performance.


      Who did not participate in the elections is not smart three times.


      (Why such a strict censor for VO? It is impossible to write in one word - not clever! There is no such word in Russian? How can I retell a Russian folk tale about three brothers - Elder, Middle and Younger Ivan the Fool?)
    2. falcon
      falcon 19 September 2016 16: 56
      +6
      Quote: Rostov2016
      If the elections influenced something then, then the people would go. And so everyone understands that this is all fiction and do not want to feel like fools in this performance.

      You know, before going to the polls, people definitely participated in this performance
      on the side of EP, as a dumb extras. Much more stupid
      situation.
  10. guzik007
    guzik007 19 September 2016 16: 04
    +9
    The voting results are also the reaction of our citizens to attempts to exert external pressure on Russia ...
    -------------------------------------------------
    -------------------------------------------------
    -------------
    You are right, Vladimir Vladimirovich. All our people have a heartache for Honduras. That's how we wake up, so immediately it starts to get sick, it used to get caught that you even forget about ridiculous salaries, an ersatz-grub from supermarkets, half-impoverished "builders of communism (oh!) - pensioners, rudeness and indifference of the authorities. looked great.
    And what all the thieves from the winning party is, therefore, the winner. Such is the tradition-seized power (oh!), The city - four years (OH!) For three days.
  11. Altona
    Altona 19 September 2016 16: 06
    +11
    He dragged his embezzlers with his rating and is now sincerely surprised. And he was the first to run to the EP headquarters. In general, GDP is the president of EP, and not the whole nation. Let Ulyukaev and Chubais teach patriotism, take an iPhone, a Hasselblad and a MacBook from Medvedev.
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov 19 September 2016 16: 29
      +3
      and who is your president? If Putin is not with you?

      Under Putin and United Russia - which areas of the economy, industry - were killed? Maybe they ruined the army? Agriculture?

      Specifically. Where did it get worse than it was before Putin and United Russia?

      Well, and an example of the president of the whole nation? If you write like this, then there are such examples. When is the whole nation 99,9999% or 100%?

      or are you ... peeing crap ... To keep up with the trend?) After all, scolding power is so cool and fashionable, and most importantly, you need only unlimited Internet access!)

    2. vovanpain
      vovanpain 19 September 2016 16: 31
      +9
      Quote: Altona
      Medvedev’s iPhone, Hasselblad and MacBook will be taken away.

      Agree fellow
  12. weksha50
    weksha50 19 September 2016 16: 07
    +8
    Well, we’ve gotten used to bravura reports since the time of the CPSU ...
    But the results of the voter turnout do not at all speak of people's trust in the servants of the people ...
    The results of the turnout in Moscow, St. Petersburg and the Moscow Region were modestly removed ... But this may also indicate that it was in these formations that the oppositionists worked "effectively" ... Or maybe that they were tired of all these empty talkers .. ...
    Well, the elections have passed, but here is the opinion of part of the people:

    And they voted for EP mainly, most likely, precisely for one reason - not wanting to rock the boat ...
    It is a pity that the Yerovtsy do not understand this ... Obviously, they are now in a state of euphoria ... But there is nothing special to be proud of ...
    The king is naked ...
    PS By the king, I didn’t mean the President, but the EP with its leadership ... They don’t have any real significant support, whatever interest ... There is a desire of the people not to escalate the situation inside the country, we now have enough problems .. .
    1. Kahlan amnell
      Kahlan amnell 19 September 2016 22: 09
      +1
      Quote: weksha50
      There is a desire of the people not to escalate the situation inside the country, we now have enough problems ...

      There is another example of neighboring Ukraine. Who knows, if everything was quiet among them, then our people would be indignant at the arrogance of bureaucrats? And so we see what the antics of a group of young people turned out to be and are ready for another 5 years to endure official shamelessness "... if only there was no war"...
  13. Altona
    Altona 19 September 2016 16: 09
    +9
    Quote: Ivan Tucha
    I did not go to the polls. But, a little watched the progress of the election race. The only party that did not discuss other parties and did not poke a finger at them digging into de..e is EP. And in this behavior lies the confidence, calculation and strength of EP. No other party offers ANY real, not utopian steps. The population implicitly knows who will benefit and, in principle, is not opposed - for stability, with all the minuses of the current situation, is better than the new derban.

    --------------------------------------
    But the stability of the Deriban is not visible is it? Medvedev is charging the Russians with a new wave of privatization and raising the retirement age. No money. And what does EP offer? EP offers to push as quickly as possible from the budget all who can and cannot and cut the budget itself. But you didn’t understand. Therefore, Putin now teaches them a little and threatens with a finger.
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov 19 September 2016 17: 42
      +2
      But how does the party of parliament cut the budget and how is it directly connected with it?

      How do you imagine that?

      But the stability of the Deriban is not visible is it?


      can you imagine, before EP appeared in parliament, the IMF filled our budget hi

      Under the EP of the Russian Federation, it began to repay debts because the same budget appeared love

      he’s like a dribble) But I understand this is a little more difficult to understand than the slogans about cutting and dribbling) Therefore, your post is normal.

      It would be strange if people suddenly started massively turning on their heads, asking themselves logical questions)

      1. Alf
        Alf 19 September 2016 18: 12
        +6
        can you imagine, before EP appeared in parliament, the IMF filled our budget hi

        Under the EP of the Russian Federation, it began to repay debts because the budget appeared

        Before EP, oil cost 8-9 bucks, and after 2004 it soared to 170. That's the secret to success. Now oil has collapsed and the budget has immediately crackled. What did the EP do in two years of crisis to fill the treasury? Introduced a progressive tax? Reduced interest on loans for industry? No, EP still threw all the problems to the people. The basic principle is that now we’ll tighten our eggs, cut back on the expenses of the country (but not the elite) and we will wait for the rise in oil prices.
        1. St Petrov
          St Petrov 19 September 2016 18: 36
          +2
          Before EP, oil was worth 8-9 bucks


          true?



          Reduced interest on loans for industry


          yes!) as for CX. It's just not interesting to look for information about it.

    2. Alf
      Alf 19 September 2016 18: 05
      +2
      Therefore, Putin now teaches them a little and threatens with a finger.

      And Vaska is listening and eating ..
  14. Res_Ullus
    Res_Ullus 19 September 2016 16: 13
    +1
    According to him, "the question arises as to how this (the result of" United Russia ") was achieved against the background of sufficiently large difficulties in the economy and social sphere, against the background of a known decline in real incomes of citizens.

    And here everything is just simple. Many of us live by the principle "If only there was no war." And you know, dear ones, there is something in this. IMHO
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 19 September 2016 16: 32
      +11
      "Many of us live by the principle" If only there was no war "." ////

      And this is the main success of official propaganda in Russia.
      Most of the population convinced that the war was about to begin and therefore
      we must endure everything and forgive the authorities. This is the deepest lie, but it works successfully.

      The USA is the only serious adversary
      large army - is in a deeply defensive position.
      And not because of Russia, but because of China. China has done an incredible 30 years
      a leap that was not planned in any Pentagon military budgets.
      And they have no financial reserves for the war.
      All their headache, how to be able to restrain China, cover up the allies with which they are associated
      obligations. Therefore, they keep a low profile with both Russia and Iran.
      1. St Petrov
        St Petrov 19 September 2016 17: 52
        +4
        And this is the main success of official propaganda in Russia.
        Most of the population convinced that the war was about to begin and therefore
        we must endure everything and forgive the authorities. This is the deepest lie, but it works successfully.


        this is what we would do without the chosen ones!

        Thank you. And then I didn’t believe in BBS and SNS (and Alyosha bulk generally speaking did not arouse confidence) - but as soon as I read you on the forum and I saw it!

        That turns out to be the success of the Russian official (sometimes not official yet apparently) propaganda.

        Actually, Jews are smarter than Russians. But it’s cool that you go to the forum here and explain to us wretched geopolitical curtsies

        The USA is the only serious adversary
        large army - is in a deeply defensive position.


        EPT laughing the poor are defending themselves from any intervention on their islands of freedom. and the enemies are all twigs and twigs.

        China invader yes. This is probably why it was not included in the estimates of the Pentagon soldier

        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 19 September 2016 18: 08
          +2
          "but as soon as I read you on the forum and I saw the light!" ///

          I'm glad I managed to help someone. fellow
          1. St Petrov
            St Petrov 19 September 2016 18: 15
            +2
            )) yes cool thanks
      2. SPACE
        SPACE 19 September 2016 21: 47
        +1
        Quote: voyaka uh

        And this is the main success of official propaganda in Russia.
        Most of the population convinced that the war was about to begin and therefore
        we must endure everything and forgive the authorities.

        Great))) "Nambu van threat", Syria, Ukraine, Sanctions, Boeing, Ishil, Olympiad, missile defense, NATO in the Baltic States, NATO in Europe, increased contingent, turned off transponders, etc., all blind and of course, this is Kremlin propaganda)) ) Yeah, the Kremlin's success in the dibilism of the State Department. Are you at least sometimes sure that you are sometimes smart?
        Quote: voyaka uh
        This is the deepest lie, but it works successfully.

        This is the most idiotic lie, which has not worked for a long time ago, but "there" again "unveiled", stupidly, but they continue for the umpteenth time to eat cactus and wonder at their own still undetected nihilism.
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 19 September 2016 23: 09
          +2
          Large land forces needed to attack Russia
          tank and infantry forces. And to repel her attacks too.
          Neither the United States nor NATO has them in nature. Ground forces
          America, Britain, Germany are sharply reduced and are record small in the entire post-war history. Tanks -
          with gulkin nose. And you know that very well.
          Every day you are kept in pre-war hysteria so that
          distract from the worsening economic situation.
          Yes, the attitude towards Russia in the West is now unfriendly, they are openly afraid of Russia, but there is no preparation for aggression against it. There are no human or technical resources for this.
          1. St Petrov
            St Petrov 20 September 2016 10: 54
            0
            There are no human or technical resources for this.


            Are you talking about NATO? Or the USA?

            but there is no preparation for aggression against it


            write such nonsense and not stutter - this must be able to)
  15. Baloo
    Baloo 19 September 2016 16: 17
    +1
    I did not go to the polls, because there are a lot of chores around the house, the weather is leaving. Before November, you still have to have time to plaster the partitions, the electrician.
    If I had gone, I would have supported Rodina, United Russia, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the Liberal Democratic Party, the Fair, and so will break through. Interestingly, my friends asked me for whom I would go to vote, for some reason they assumed that I was for the apple or the Liberal Democratic Party.
    Yavlinsky never believed his party either. These are talkers. LDPR is a lot of words and populism. I ask the next time to hold elections at the end of November or the beginning of December, but not in spring, summer and not in early autumn. wink
  16. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 19 September 2016 16: 17
    +1
    For the next election, all parties need to be renamed - it was the Liberal Democratic Party, became united Russia2, there was the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, became united Russia3, there was an apple, became united Russia44, and so on !!! lol
  17. yuriy55
    yuriy55 19 September 2016 16: 19
    +15
    Throw you, really ... At a turnout of 40%, talk about some kind of victory with 100% use of the administrative resource? With the obvious poise of citizens in connection with the known outcome of the outcome ... And if the other party had won, would it have won a parliamentary majority? Nobody ever voluntarily surrendered power. Honest elections are when they vote for party lists with a well-known program and a list of candidates for deputies. Honest elections are when neither the president nor the governor expresses their attitude to a particular party except for acquaintance with objectionable simple ignorance ... Honest elections are when people come to power to improve the welfare of citizens and the economic and political situation of the country in the world.
    And when a hackneyed record feeds happy gingerbread cookies of the future, to which no one will just have time to live, it is at least silly and disgusting ... Are these very famous people, those who climbed into the State Duma, will solve the problems of the regions? We have already found out how they communicate with voters by the family of Fedyaev, Makarov and other elected ones ...
    Capitalism cannot be the system of the future because it contains the main disconnecting society essence - the exploitation of man by man using various kinds of draconian measures. Making a profit from the development of the economy does not go to the development of the country and society, but to the pockets of the capitalists ... the money underpaid in salaries, pensions and other payments goes to satisfy lust, debauchery and simple gluttony. If the party that won the election considers such a system to be an ideal, then it is very cruelly mistaken, it is mistaken just as the game-play is mistaken, putting all the money on a lame horse (in our case, idolizing a person, his rights, decency and image so far take the highest score in an empty audience due to the lack of competitors and rivals) ....
    But have you all taken into account, gentlemen of United Russia? Your 20% of real votes say that 80% of Russians have not yet decided, or simply do not want to spoil their nerves and waste time on the political struggle in which you and your colleagues (and belay sponsor oligarchs) are very agile and resourceful ...
    What to say more? Each one chose his own life path, like a horse that carries a cart with a belongings ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
  18. AUL
    AUL 19 September 2016 16: 22
    +5
    Quote: Ivan Tucha
    for stability, with all the minuses of the current situation, is better than a new derban.

    Yes of course! We sit in der.me, but stable!
  19. win
    win 19 September 2016 16: 29
    +4
    the will of Russian citizens was one of the answers to external attempts to destabilize the situation in the Russian Federation

    Obama and Merkel are marching. Obama asks Merkel “Merkel, where are we going?”
    Merkel - “Where, where ... Where Putin sent ... there and go”
  20. Strength
    Strength 19 September 2016 16: 30
    +1
    As Maltsev and Gudkov said, this may be the last election in Russia. It's a shame if it will be so.
    1. vovanpain
      vovanpain 19 September 2016 17: 11
      +12
      Quote: Force
      As Maltsev and Gudkov said

      Oh, yes, these are such, authorities, where to go. fellow
    2. gg.na
      gg.na 19 September 2016 17: 32
      +3
      Quote: Force
      As Maltsev and Gudkov said, this may be the last election in Russia. It's a shame if it will be so.

      And if it's not a secret, then why the latter ??! Could you tell us more fully, tell the audience here. what
      1. Strength
        Strength 19 September 2016 19: 44
        0
        And you find the video and look about the 2016 elections. Maybe you will understand.
        1. gg.na
          gg.na 19 September 2016 21: 30
          +1
          Quote: Force
          And you find the video and look about the 2016 elections. Maybe you will understand.

          Wait a minute, dear, you yourself say, but don’t transfer the arrows to some video there! In your own words, please write here! And I’ll try to understand !!! bully
          1. vovanpain
            vovanpain 19 September 2016 23: 42
            +9
            Quote: gg.na
            Wait a minute, dear, you yourself say, but don’t transfer the arrows to some video there! In your own words, please write here! And I’ll try to understand !!!

            He won’t write, his colleague is VO and not Echo of Moscow, you know about Gudk Gudkov, I’ve got a little bit about Maltsev: Vyacheslav Vyacheslavovich Maltsev (born June 7, 1964, Saratov, USSR) is a Russian political and public figure, blogger. Three times elected deputy of the Saratov Regional Duma. In 2016, he was a candidate for deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation from the party PARNAS. In 1987 he graduated from the Saratov Order of the Badge of Honor, D. I. Kursky Law Institute. In 1982-1984 he served in the border troops. From 1987 to 1989 he worked in the police, was a district inspector of the Zavodskoy District Department of Internal Affairs of Saratov, from 1989 to 1996 - served as general director of the Allegro detective bureau of the Saratov detective office. According to Maltsev, in the 1990s he was the richest man in the region, two thousand employees worked in his agency. Subsequently, Maltsev sold all of his property. In May 1994, Maltsev was elected to the Saratov Regional Duma of the first convocation, then - in August 1997 and September 2002 - he was twice re-elected to the regional parliament. In the first and third convocations, he was deputy chairman, in the second and third convocations secretary. In the 1990s, he was a member of the Fatherland-All Russia party, where he met Vyacheslav Volodin, in 2007 he headed the Great Russia Saratov branch in Saratov, and in the same year he created Mikhail Kasyanov’s RNDS branch in the city. In 2007, Maltsev, as a deputy of the Saratov Regional Duma, proposed amendments to the laws “On Guarantees of Electoral Rights” and “On the State Civil Service”, according to which a citizen nominating himself for election or wishing to become an official should indicate his sexual orientation. In 2012, Maltsev tried to run for parliament from the Communist Party in one of the single-mandate constituencies in Saratov, but failed: his rival, representative of United Russia Alexei Mazepov, received 63,76% of the vote, while Maltsev was cast preference is only 21,41% of voters. Subsequently, the politician claimed that the election was rigged and that the victory was to go to him. Since December 2011, Maltsev has been conducting the political video blog “Bad News” on YouTube, starting on weekdays at 21:00. Each issue lasts an hour and a half. Periodically, on his YouTube channel, Maltsev holds debates with various well-known figures (for example, Stepan Demura, Dmitry Dyomushkin, Dmitry Ivanov (kamikadze_d), Olga Li). Maltsev believes that the revolution in Russia will begin on November 5, 2017, and in each issue of his video blog he counts the number of days until this date. Maltsev positions himself as “an ordinary normal Russian nationalist”, and also calls himself and his supporters national democrats. Maltsev does not deny that he is a populist, emphasizing that he considers populism as a “tactical method of working with voters.” Usual political forgiveness ... Sincerely, colleague. hi
            1. gg.na
              gg.na 20 September 2016 07: 19
              +1
              Quote: vovanpain
              Regular political forgive ... ka. Regards colleague.

              Thank you for such a detailed answer !!! Very good good and the answer is quite complete !!! Yes You 100500 + !!!
    3. Alf
      Alf 19 September 2016 18: 20
      +4
      As Maltsev and Gudkov said, this may be the last election in Russia. It's a shame if it will be so.

      It will be so, but on the other hand. Regular coins were issued. The most common running coins. If not for one BUT! On the return, the coat of arms of Russia was replaced by the coat of arms of the Romanovs. Not otherwise, the GDP was about to be crowned. And what? Tsar-father in stock, faithful boyars edrosov in stock, slaves in stock. It remains to appoint a day of coronation. Soon binge-God save the king.
  21. gg.na
    gg.na 19 September 2016 16: 37
    +3
    The voting results are also the reaction of our citizens to attempts at external pressure on Russia, to threats, sanctions, to attempts to sway the situation in our country from within. Citizens have chosen stability.

    President Vladimir Vladimirovich said everything correctly !!!
    Personally, I voted for United Russia !!! My family is the wife of two daughters and a son voted for United Russia, my brothers and their wives are the same for United RUSSIA. My acquaintances and friends also voted for United Russia. Mother-in-law voted for the Communist Party. And my mother voted for the Liberal Democratic Party, she really likes Zhirinovsky Vladimir Volfovich and his program!
    1. vovanpain
      vovanpain 19 September 2016 17: 00
      +13
      Quote: gg.na
      Personally, I voted for United Russia !!! My family is the wife of two daughters and a son voted for United Russia, my brothers and their wives are the same for United RUSSIA. My acquaintances and friends also voted for United Russia. Mother-in-law voted for the Communist Party. And my mother voted for the Liberal Democratic Party, she really likes Zhirinovsky Vladimir Volfovich and his program!

      A colleague is reporting hi Personally, I voted for the Communist Party, my wife and mother also for the Communist Party, children, daughter and son ruined the ballots, they don’t like any party, but they’re up to the elections, they went kind of a formidable father’s roar laughing , grandchildren did not vote because of their childhood, her sister voted for the "Civic Platform" her husband is Jewish. request Mother-in-law and father-in-law have long been gone, unfortunately. hi wink
      1. gg.na
        gg.na 19 September 2016 17: 28
        +1
        Quote: vovanpain
        A colleague reports personally I voted for the Communist Party, my wife and mother are also for the Communist Party

        I sincerely respect your choice and the choice of your family! I’ll add that I didn’t roar at anyone, everyone decided to go to the polls themselves and made a choice without any outside pressure. After the election, I already asked at home who voted for whom (I myself was interested to know feel ) after I called my brothers and met friends I also asked. The answer was United Russia!
        1. vovanpain
          vovanpain 19 September 2016 17: 42
          +9
          Quote: gg.na
          I sincerely respect your choice and the choice of your family!

          Thank you colleague and mutually respect your choice and your relatives, it’s your choice and no one forced you because you went and voted and didn’t sit on the couch in front of the monitor, a cup of coffee and do not argue now in the comments uuuu which EdRo is not good, me too I don’t like EdRo, but I expressed my position by voting for the one I consider necessary, just as you and your relatives and family expressed your position. Respectfully. hi
          1. gg.na
            gg.na 19 September 2016 21: 36
            +1
            Quote: vovanpain
            but I expressed my position by voting for the one I consider necessary,

            Everything is correct and accessible. Clearly state your position! And the elections are for everyone to express their personal opinion !!! hi
      2. woron333444
        woron333444 19 September 2016 19: 28
        +3
        I especially liked about the husband of a Jew
    2. Oleneboy_
      Oleneboy_ 19 September 2016 17: 58
      0
      Zhirik has no program if that ... some slogans
      1. gg.na
        gg.na 19 September 2016 21: 41
        0
        Some believe that there is a program, others believe that there is no program ... As for me personally, I don’t request I know because I did not delve into recourse what Vladimir Volfovich says about the elections and everything connected with them. I'm just not here request I know what to say !!!
  22. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 19 September 2016 16: 43
    +7
    Well, thank God they survived to the period of developed democracy. For whom do not vote, the result will be the same. laughing
    1. 31R-US
      31R-US 19 September 2016 17: 25
      +4
      That is, you want to say that "vote, don't vote, you'll get it anyway ..."
      1. Kahlan amnell
        Kahlan amnell 19 September 2016 22: 34
        0
        Quote: 31R-US
        That is, you want to say that "vote, don't vote, you'll get it anyway ..."

        "United Russia".
  23. fa2998
    fa2998 19 September 2016 17: 04
    +3
    Quote: dsm100
    "The election results are the response of citizens to attempts at external pressure on Russia" ...

    The result of the election is that more than half of the voters did not appear to vote! People are already accustomed that their vote does not solve anything! Stuffing and administrative resources. AND DO NOT NEED TO COMPARE US WITH THE GOOD EUROPE - they say there is also a low percentage. People are happy there and don’t want anything change. If they would set a living wage in our city - 100 euros (8000 rubles), and many more work for smaller amounts-HERE ALL EUROPEANS ARE LINE-UP FOR ELECTION CENTERS-urgently change the power!
    We have a lot of dissatisfied, there would be a line "AGAINST ALL", and there would be a situation if it picks up more than 50%, then the parties that accepted in the elections are removed and new elections are appointed, I think everyone who missed the vote would come! hi
  24. 31R-US
    31R-US 19 September 2016 17: 20
    +1
    In the elections, there are also pluses, in our street for five years of endless complaints they finally made a "speed bump", promised to make the next sidewalk for pedestrians, the street is 20 years old.
  25. Delink
    Delink 19 September 2016 17: 31
    +4
    If not for the fraud on the ground, EP would have received fewer votes.
  26. Oleneboy_
    Oleneboy_ 19 September 2016 17: 56
    +1
    the elections were rigged ... this is clear already for the hedgehog
  27. Yak28
    Yak28 19 September 2016 17: 59
    +1
    I am for Yeltsin, Our home is Russia, Putin and United Russia did not vote, and my conscience is clear wink
  28. Stauffenberg
    Stauffenberg 19 September 2016 18: 02
    +2
    Those who did not come voted against everyone. Because the level of trust in government is extremely low. Like, they’ll steal my voice anyway. The victory of ep - pyrrhic. Because when the power ceases to hear the people arise in 1917. Or various kinds of springs.
    The level of pressure on civil servants was unprecedented. Such a victory from under the stick will not lead to good. The entire young generation is categorically against ep. So the current system of government has no future.
    1. OLD FART
      OLD FART 19 September 2016 20: 59
      0
      Quote: Stauffenberg
      Those who did not come voted against everyone. Because the level of trust in government is extremely low. Like, they’ll steal my voice anyway. The victory of ep - pyrrhic. Because when the power ceases to hear the people arise in 1917. Or various kinds of springs.
      The level of pressure on civil servants was unprecedented. Such a victory from under the stick will not lead to good. The entire young generation is categorically against ep. So the current system of government has no future.

      Going out to the swamp? We are ready from the Urals, even now to prove .... Or are you with us?
  29. wadulya
    wadulya 19 September 2016 18: 13
    +1
    We don’t give a damn about external pressure, and low turnout, distrust of the authorities and confidence that everyone had decided before the elections.
  30. Yak28
    Yak28 19 September 2016 18: 19
    0
    Quote: yuriy55
    to talk about some kind of victory with 100% use of the administrative resource?

    I can confirm the 100% use of the administrative resource, my bosses at work forced everyone to go to the polls, but they didn’t speak for whom. A deputy from EP came to our office and met with the bosses. My wife was asked to vote for EP at work.
    A deputy from EP came to school for a parent’s meeting, all the entrances are glued with posters of candidates from ER. The city of Moscow. Remember how dozens, if not hundreds of thousands of Muscovites came out in support of Putin in Moscow, be sure more than half are not of their own free will, also applies to May Day demonstrations. By the way, Putin's foreign policy is going well, but in the domestic one it’s full of cesspool.
  31. Knight Rider
    Knight Rider 19 September 2016 18: 23
    +2
    I went and voted on all the ballots for the Communist Party. The result is neither happy nor upset. It is what it is. The turnout is less than 50%, which means that the victory in the elections, relatively speaking, was won by the “non-comer”. Why the voter didn’t come to the polling stations - let everyone be responsible for himself, it’s impossible to row all of them one size fits all and say one or two reasons.
    I don’t remember that Putin called for voting for United Russia, although United Russia actively referred to support for the President’s course, like Rodina, the Party of Rosta and a number of other parties. For comparison, look at what is happening in the US election race. This is where the so-called administrative resource works with might and main, at the highest state level! And this is in democratic America, which does not allow OSCE observers to see a cannon shot at their elections ...
    In general, in the next five years, all responsibility will again rest with the United Russia, they will be opposed by the same Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the Liberal Democratic Party and the SR, and from the newcomers - one single-mandate deputy from Rodina, Civil Platform and one self-nominated deputy ...
  32. Fox
    Fox 19 September 2016 18: 25
    +2
    like people write adult comments, but believe in elections like small children ... examples of falsification are darkness. list, even more ... it’s just interesting, are there differences in these varieties of drama (parties)? funny faces 20 years old.
  33. kaserog
    kaserog 19 September 2016 18: 49
    +2
    I haven’t seen so many tears and snot for a long time - the reality is harsh and there is no alternative to both EP and the guarantor - well, no that's all

    By the way, the corps of deputies from EP has been updated strongly
    1. avia1991
      avia1991 19 September 2016 19: 04
      0
      Quote: Caserogue
      reality is harsh and there is no alternative to either ep or guarantor

      Rave. Pure putinoid slogans! Your deity probably pays you well - no less than the "average regional" laughing
  34. avia1991
    avia1991 19 September 2016 19: 02
    +2
    The voting results are also the reaction of our citizens to attempts to exert external pressure on Russia, (...) Citizens have chosen stability.
    Citizens simply ignored the elections! .. Thus, showing that there is no trust in the authorities - as there is no trust in the election results ..
    However, the This is, to the President, quite obvious on the drum: the main thing is that power is formally preserved within the framework in which it was. What no one really doubted ..
    1. Knight Rider
      Knight Rider 19 September 2016 21: 36
      +1
      Quote: avia1991
      Citizens simply ignored the elections! .. Thus, showing that there is no trust in the authorities - as there is no trust in the election results ..
      However, it’s quite obvious to the President about the drum: the main thing is that power is formally preserved within the framework in which it was. What no one really doubted ..

      Give examples of turnout in parliamentary elections in Europe.
      And then do not consider yourself the main election expert, look funny. Lack of trust in the authorities is just one of the reasons not to go to the polls. Moreover, even in the absence of trust, people can go to the polls and express their distrust by voting for the opposition or writing on the ballot everything they think about the authorities. There are such examples. The lack of any interest in politics is what does not make people vote, the LDPR, the Communists, United Russia, Putin, Zyuganov, Yavlinsky and so on. - people don't care. And I personally know such people ... What else ... laziness, there is no possibility, everything suits, etc. smile
      1. avia1991
        avia1991 19 September 2016 22: 15
        0
        Quote: KnightRider
        What else ... laziness, there is no possibility, everything suits, etc.

        And that too, of course. But the majority of those who did not go to the polling stations simply developed a strong belief that nothing depends on their opinion. And this is the direct "merit" of fifteen years of the current government! Hypocrisy and Lies are the basis of the current political system: when people who actually live their day are told that they do not live the way they "think" - on the contrary, they have high salaries, stable jobs, and a bright future - because that "the country is being reborn" thanks to the titanic efforts of the "party and government"!
        Doesn't this remind you of anything?
        As for the actual elections .. I don't know how people voted in the village of Pupkino, as in Omsk or Anadyr. But I know at least one and a half hundred people - my friends, acquaintances, colleagues - who, despite the mismatch of political bias, agree on one thing: they do not vote for United Russia. Only 3 (!) People voted “For” - and even more because Valentina Tereshkova, a person who is really respected and known for her deeds, was campaigning for it.
        My observations very naturally resonate with the results of a survey conducted here at VO. These results are a much more accurate reflection of the political preferences of Russians than those figures shown to us from large screens. And this is the bitter truth.
        By the way, have you watched the 60 minutes program today? Mr. Zheleznyak in it very clearly demonstrated the "vicious grin of the winner": otherwise, as rudeness, his behavior cannot be described wassat "And what? The elections are over, you can relax! Tired of holding your face for two months! Shut up all - the people have shown us" trust, "so don't blather!"
        Sheep skins are now slowly starting to fall off. What is there beneath them? Wait and see.
        Quote: KnightRider
        don't consider yourself a top election expert; look funny.

        Yes, not a joke! belay Especially, having experience of work in the election commission. After that, I try to stay away from such "works" - so that there is no shame in front of people.
        Quote: KnightRider
        Give examples of turnout in parliamentary elections in Europe.

        But we are not in Europe. And I don’t want us to have it like in Europe - I want it to be better with us! Because, let me say, we are fed up with "European democracy" .. hi
  35. Darth Revan
    Darth Revan 19 September 2016 19: 29
    0
    There is no real alternative to EP. The same KPRF-LDPR-SR - where is the guarantee that when they come to power, a new division of the pie will not begin? Let me tell you straight: I am not a Putinist, I am a Stalinist and a Russian nationalist. In a good sense of the word. I am not a supporter of United Russia, but I am not a supporter of the "opposition" either. For opposition is a fiction. And at the moment there is no real force capable of leading the country to the height that was given to it by right by God.
    1. Bloodsucker
      Bloodsucker 20 September 2016 10: 51
      0
      Quote: Darth Revan
      I will say directly: I am not a Putinist, I am a Stalinist and a Russian nationalist.

      Honestly, you have porridge in your head.
      What does the Communist Party of the Russian Federation have to do with the so-called pie-sharing, if its PROGRAM says something completely different? Okay, LDPR, everything is clear, the most faithful liberation of EP will be exactly the orphan’s pie to share for their own, the same party of defectors, CP, the same.
      Quote: Darth Revan
      For the opposition is fiction. But at the moment there is no real force capable of taking the country to the height that God has rightfully given to it.

      Oh, what a loud statement, why would it be? Well, it’s clear that all the rattling armies from pornAss and all kinds of growth partners there — to where and to whom the height is at interest, it’s clear that civil platforms and apple parasites are not opposition, they are drones, malicious and useless.
      But to deny the opposition of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation against the backdrop of the total silence of their initiatives, counteraction on all information platforms, is at least stupid.
      You, and you say that you are a Stalinist, do not realize that there are only two Capital-Ideologies in the world, which is represented by EP and its spoilers and Social Justice, and this is the Communist Party.
      Stalin didn’t demand social justice? How else. But who replaced this with a consumerist infection, is it Khrushchev-dispute?
      Now the heirs of Khrushchev, and they are not few in the service team of EP, have infected the public with a consumer attitude to everything, including you, since you repeat their ideologies and think that you must show someone else the opposition in matters of principle, and you, sitting on the couch , thoughtfully you will deny everything and everyone.
      One of the major film directors, I will not write about his party affiliation, Putin's confidant, as he said, the older I get, the more I understand, anti-Sovietism, anti-communism, is a form of Russophobia.
      http://pravdoiskatel77.livejournal.com/10792889.h
      tml
  36. japs
    japs 19 September 2016 19: 39
    +4
    In my opinion, the elections, as always, were held by "managers" from the authorities. Turnout is the most striking indicator that people do not believe in elections.
    Comrade Zu, if he won, he would be stunned by this fact. And even more so, he was stunned the next day - when all the bureaucratic army would have joined the ranks of his party. But this, of course, is fantasy.
    1. OLD FART
      OLD FART 19 September 2016 19: 55
      +1
      Quote: japs
      In my opinion, the elections, as always, were held by "managers" from the authorities. Turnout is the most striking indicator that people do not believe in elections.
      Comrade Zu, if he won, he would be stunned by this fact. And even more so, he was stunned the next day - when all the bureaucratic army would have joined the ranks of his party. But this, of course, is fantasy.

      Enough of hysteria and yelling .... Normal elections have passed.! Nobody needs these parties; here the theme is the survival of Russia and you and me. angry Either they are us, or we are them .... And you here with your "parties" began to scream ..? ugh damn it!
      You need to work on the ground and that's it! Homeland men are in danger .... God bless Russia!

      Shut up toads., In the swamp .... angry
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 19 September 2016 20: 04
        +3
        Vital, and I voted for Rodina. Am I an idiot or a provocateur?
        1. OLD FART
          OLD FART 19 September 2016 20: 31
          0
          Quote: mordvin xnumx
          Vital, and I voted for Rodina. Am I an idiot or a provocateur?

          Normally voted Vladimir! hi
          Just this howl is coming, they needed it ...

          Imagine such results .... Khodor returns to Moscow, Abramovich is governor of Yakutia (with his Chelsea club ..))) And it begins ... drinks
  37. TOPchymBA
    TOPchymBA 19 September 2016 21: 00
    +1
    Liberals and foreigners were pleased in the comments. (Here should be the words of Zadornov about the West - you know which ones).
    If there are doubts about the honesty of the elections, then it is necessary to reinforce them with real facts and not with lengthy arguments of castrated cats. It seems that it’s easier to take a video camera, in extreme cases, a telephone and stand by the polling station. You can see a lot of interesting things (I know what I'm talking about). And after its closure, put on the pipe what was filmed.
    It seems to be simple, but strangely enough there are no such videos on the Internet, and nobody raises high on this issue with specific videos.
    And if there are no real facts, then you would go (you yourself know where) gentlemen liberals and foreigners. It is clear that sitting on the couch is more convenient to work out grandmothers from Phashington than to stand on the street for 12 hours.
    So as they say themselves are to blame.
    Regarding the Communist Party and the whining of the election results, Uncle Zyu. The first and last time I voted for the Communist Party in the second election of Yeltsin. As it turned out, Uncle Zu’s gut was thin. Therefore, there is no more confidence in him. Everyone knows about the LDPR. Well, Mr. Sukhol from SR is clearly not the kind of person that Russia needs now.
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 22 September 2016 16: 17
      0
      TOPchimba

      What factors do you need?

      You probably don’t have your own eyes, but about common sense there’s no conversation at all.

      Look. Who cleaned the thief during the construction of the spaceport? The answer is Putin. Came and drove edrosov through the cracks. Where was the prime minister? And where is Rogozin, who boasted amers on trampolines into space to send.

      Forgot?

      Yes, you look at the prime minister, who can’t say two words to the public without a prompter from an iPhone, about his direct work.

      Where to get the managerial staff of GDP? There is no one to work in the party of thieves. With so much dead mass, it’s hard to find competent managers. After all, the existing party in power is, by nature, a party of consumption. They cannot lead to progress.

      At least that is done only by units of higher ones. And the performers?

      The only effective repressive apparatus of GDP. But it’s not enough to remove the thief, you need to put a competent one. And where to get it if there is no rotation of personnel. Vorje has been sitting in the executive apparatus for about fifteen years.
  38. Altona
    Altona 19 September 2016 21: 04
    +1
    Quote: s-t Petrov
    Under Putin and United Russia - which areas of the economy, industry - were killed? Maybe they ruined the army? Agriculture?

    ------------------------------
    CHUVASHIYA, Industrial tractor in Cheboksary does not work, Industrial tractor in Kanash does not work, birch trees are growing in the fields. Do you think I'm just writing?
  39. Altona
    Altona 19 September 2016 21: 10
    +2
    Quote: s-t Petrov
    how does the party of parliament cut the budget and how is it directly connected with it?

    -------------------------------------------
    How? But who sawed off 150 billion from health care and education in the budget? Pushkin? And who is going to raise the retirement age? Lermontov? And who called education and health services? The EP party is associated with big business and distributes financial flows through the budget, passes laws to help big business, mainly hydrocarbon exporters. It publishes public procurement laws. In our country, the Parliament adopts a budget, not Putin and not the Government. Well, you are a strange comrade. Otherwise, why would representatives of big business rush to the Duma?
  40. Altona
    Altona 19 September 2016 22: 00
    +12
    Quote: gg.na
    Personally, I voted for United Russia !!! My family is the wife of two daughters and the son voted for United RUSSIA, my brothers and their wives are the same for United RUSSIA. My acquaintances and friends also voted for United Russia.

    ---------------------------------
    Well done, I congratulate you comrade bourgeois and bourgeois.
  41. Mentat
    Mentat 20 September 2016 00: 17
    0
    Quote: dsm100
    Remember not the previous election was a turnout of 116%

    According to whose data?
  42. Mentat
    Mentat 20 September 2016 00: 19
    0
    Quote: Altona
    Quote: gg.na
    Personally, I voted for United Russia !!! My family is the wife of two daughters and the son voted for United RUSSIA, my brothers and their wives are the same for United RUSSIA. My acquaintances and friends also voted for United Russia.

    ---------------------------------
    Well done, I congratulate you comrade bourgeois and bourgeois.

    Practice has shown that this same people (everywhere on Earth) is not ready for other forms of the existence of the state, except for the capitalist one. You can regret it, but at the moment it is.
  43. jonht
    jonht 20 September 2016 04: 02
    +1
    I personally voted for the EP, the Communist Party was stuck in late 90 and early 2000, the Liberal Democratic Party is just the thesis and nothing more, the CP and others are not at all, and the liberals still have to answer for 90 first. It’s not necessary to measure thieves by parties, but according to the Criminal Code article, and it doesn’t matter which party he is in, the law does not work well as a result, the prosecutor’s office is mired in kickbacks .... And in EP, in addition, in 2009-2011 many defectors rushed , doihipor clean the ranks, the same Communist opportunists are no less numerous, many from one party run to another, some are for protection, some are for profit ..... and party interests and discipline are in .... a push ...
  44. Mentat
    Mentat 20 September 2016 08: 35
    0
    Quote: avia1991
    Citizens simply ignored the election! ..

    I’m even embarrassed to ask, and those whose ballots were considered are non-citizens and can be inhuman at all?

    This can be called low turnout, but “citizens ignored” - idle talk.
  45. Mentat
    Mentat 20 September 2016 09: 04
    0
    Quote: Greenwood
    The rallies in Vlad were mainly due to a sharp increase in import duties on Japanese cars, which sharply hit the automotive business in the city, and the city’s economy was largely dependent on this. The authorities, of course, acted like a pig, drove riot police from the Moscow region when the local refused to participate. As a result, the protesters, and just passers-by, and even foreign journalists with expensive equipment, were injured.

    The authorities behaved in the way that the authorities should behave, because it is necessary to develop not trade in trash from Japan, but own production.
    1. Greenwood
      Greenwood 22 September 2016 09: 51
      0
      Yeah, but there aren’t any of these industries, no. Or they are insignificant against the auto business.
  46. Smooth
    Smooth 20 September 2016 10: 05
    +3
    Quote: c-Petrov
    Prices are rising for no reason.


    Is EP guilty?) Kremlin? Putin?)

    or a huckster resale neighbor?

    I didn’t want to get into the election. However, I can not resist. I’ll put in 5 kopecks.
    Mrs. Nabiulina, who initiated the fall of the ruble rate by half against the dollar, did the "huckster's neighbor" put in office? If you are not aware, then we DO NOT have our own consumer goods. The vast majority of goods that you see in stores are either direct imports, or they are made from imported raw materials and components. Even if there is a label “made in Russia”.
    Guess from three times what will happen to the prices of these goods if the ruble falls by half? Moreover, "it" will happen to prices across the country. I would like to see a "neighbor huckster" who can do such tricks.

    And here some say about stability ... Yes, yes. There will be stability. Stability in rising prices and shrinking real incomes. "Welcome to the real world" (C).
  47. DimerVladimer
    DimerVladimer 20 September 2016 14: 45
    +1
    24.12.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX Stroygazmontazh Arkady Rotenberg (fortune, according to Forbes, $ 1 billion, 75th place) received without competition Gazprom contracts for 197,7 billion rubles [/ b].

    As follows from the information on the government procurement portal, the Stroygazmontazh company, owned by Arkady Rotenberg, became the only Gazprom supplier for the construction of the Power of Siberia gas pipeline facilities. In total, five contracts worth 44,5 billion rubles, 47,8 billion rubles, 46,6 billion rubles, 35 billion rubles were published on the site. and 23,8 billion rubles. respectively.
    Read more: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2884321

    10.082016/255/72,229 Stroytransgaz, controlled by Gennady Timchenko, will build XNUMX kilometers of the Power of Siberia gas pipeline for Gazprom for XNUMX billion rubles, according to the materials of "Gazprom". The contract was concluded on the terms of purchase from a single supplier (no contest)

    07.09.2016/XNUMX/XNUMX, Stroygazconsulting without a contract signed a contract for the construction of the Power of Siberia site for more than 21 billion rubles.
    The company, which had previously lost the status of one of the largest contractors of the monopoly, began working with Gazprom again after a change of ownership.
    In the spring of 2015, the owners of Stroygazconsulting changed: Gazprombank and the UCP fund, managed by Ilya Shcherbovich, bought the company from Manasir and his partner Ruslan Baysarov. In 2015, the company received contracts from Gazprom for 20,2 billion rubles, for January-March 2016 - for 18,2 billion rubles.

    This allowed Stroygazconsulting to return to the number of Gazprom’s largest contractors together. with Stroygazmontazh and [b] Stroytransgaz by Gennady Timchenko (valuation - $ 11,4 billion, 5th place).
    (Подробнее на РБК: http://www.rbc.ru/business/07/09/2016/57cfb81f9a7
    947cb4ee6bcf3? From = main)

    My question is: is it only friend of the great Pu - that would receive contracts without competition for construction for GAZPROM?
    Or is something else called corruption?
    For me, the question is clear who should be in prison.

    "Nice" that Pu "cares about friends" - hit by sanctions? He consoled friends with non-alternative contracts (can look at the legislation on public procurement fz 223, 44)

    If anyone has doubts - you are allowed to live in the country of the great Pu, work for the great Pu, receive money of the great Pu.
  48. g1v2
    g1v2 20 September 2016 18: 02
    +1
    A unit that refused to comply with an order must be disbanded, and criminal cases instituted against it. Definitely. The order may then be challenged by higher authorities, but the order given must be executed on the spot. The oath is such a word. I can’t say how professional the riot police actions were there - I haven’t seen it. However, forceful dispersal of an unauthorized rally is a routine thing. Any crowd has stages of existence. If the appropriate countermeasures are not taken in time, the crowd can move on to the next stage and then more serious measures will have to be applied. Simply put, not used rubber batons and shields at the beginning - can lead to a subsequent massacre with shooting. soldier Therefore, the issue is not the very fact of dispersal, but only in accordance with the applied means of influence of a particular stage of the crowd.
    1. avia1991
      avia1991 20 September 2016 23: 22
      0
      Quote: g1v2
      The order may then be challenged by higher authorities, but the order given must be executed on the spot.

      An order requiring breaking the Law should not be executed - otherwise you will become an accomplice in a crime. At least in the Soviet Army it was like that!
      And OMON is not an army: it is a means of protecting state power from the people living in the state. When the people begin to "too insist" on their rights "- the OMON is used as an argument ... and now they will also involve the Russian Guard.
      It may sound rude - but the so-called. The "elite" of the Ministry of Internal Affairs are the watchdogs of power. They are well fed, looked after, provided - and at the right time they tear the throats of anyone, because they protect not only power, but also their own well-being. This is not a reproach - just a statement .. just like that in the world "accepted", and with us, with the advent of capitalism, it has become the same.
  49. The comment was deleted.
  50. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 20 September 2016 19: 38
    +3
    People simply have no one to vote for. Everywhere the same muzzles. "ER" uses the administrative resource with might and main. A friend at work announced a month ago that each employee must not only go to vote "correctly", but also bring 3 friends / acquaintances who must also vote "correctly". Nevertheless, there is something not to see the wild delight of the elections among people.