In UEC started testing a new engine for the IL-112В

Yesterday, tests of a turboprop engine developed by AO Klimov (part of the United Engine Corporation) for a promising military transport IL-112В began, RIA News message of the press service of the JDC.

“Testing of the new TV7-117CT Russian turboprop engine developed by Klimov for the promising Russian light military transport aircraft IL-112В began on September 15 on a specially commissioned test bench in St. Petersburg,” the release says.

It is noted that the new engine "will be mass-produced in the extended cooperation of the UEC - AO Klimov, AO NPT Gas-Turbine Construction Salyut, AO MMP named after V.V. Chernyshev" and other enterprises.

“The engine has a very high performance in power and efficiency. So, the power at maximum take-off mode is 3 thousand horsepower, and at increased emergency mode - 3,6 thousand horsepower, "- told the company.

According to the press service, the capabilities of the test bench, equipped with modern equipment, "allow you to test the power plant immediately with the propeller, nacelle and other elements of the wing and fuselage of the aircraft."

UDC General Director Alexander Artyukhov:

“The launch of the TV7-117ST tests is a significant event not only for the domestic engine industry, but for the whole aviation industry. In terms of power and efficiency, this new engine is undoubtedly one of the best in the world in its class. I am sure that the combination of the strengths of TV7-117ST with the advanced solutions laid down in the Il-112V will make the aircraft an ideal transport platform for the Russian aerospace forces. ”

Help agency: "IL-112В designed for transportation and air landing of light samples of weapons and military equipment, cargo and personnel, as well as for transportation of a wide range of goods during commercial operation of the aircraft."

Comments

[UnclePasha]

Small, beautiful and elegant. There are no ugly airplanes !!!

[seti]

A very needed plane. Finally, they dealt with the most important issue - engines. Rather, they started a few years ago - now we see the first results. It remains to establish production and launch the aircraft in series.

[Temples]

Yesterday, tests began in St. Petersburg .... a turbojet

Toropyga, you already decide in the end which engine.

Tests of the new Russian turboprop engine ...

The editor apparently was still asleep, and the writer of this news on the drum - that jet, that screw, most importantly TURBO!

[bulvas]

Quote: Temples

The editor apparently was still asleep, and the writer of this news on the drum - that jet, that screw, most importantly TURBO!

The level of competence of some scribes is always striking.
People do not take up their job.
They would write to themselves about some hangouts, gossip ...

[rotmistr60]

People do not take up their job.

Obviously graphomania is contagious and acts like a drug.

[78bor1973]

I don’t see where you saw turbo-reactive? The article is only turboprop, although the turbojet should also go to this unit.

[iConst]

Quote: seti

A very needed plane.

One upsets: the Spanish (conditionally) CASA C-295 is superior in terms of basic indicators (IL-112V / CASA C-295):
Empty weight, t: 15,0 / 11,2
Max. take-off weight, t: 21,0 / 23,2
Passengers, pers .: 44/69
Maximum load, t: 6,0 / 9,7
Fuel capacity, l: 7900/7650
Horsepower × 2: 2800/1975
Practical range, km: 3400/4500
Pract. gave. at max. upload. km: 1000/1350

At the same time, overall and other characteristics are almost identical.

I conclude that the plane is already outdated beginning. project in the mid-90s).
True, maybe he has other incomparable advantages - the mentioned service, cost, unpretentiousness, etc.

[dauria]

At the same time, overall and other characteristics are almost identical.

Power density (horses per kilogram) was not included. 112 is better one and a half times. This is a MILITARY transport aircraft, here the emphasis is not on efficiency. Flying in the mountains, in the heat, from short strips, with overload, with one failure - that's what the emphasis is on. And transport workers "become obsolete" slowly. So it’s not an indicator ... And then, the replacement of the An-26 is still needed - here it is. And the niche is filled with its own. What's bad? And if you want an economical patrol or passenger, then 114 is better, that's it.

[iConst]

Quote: dauria

Specific power (horses per kilogram) was not taken into account. At 112 it is better one and a half times. This is a MILITARY transport aircraft, here the emphasis is not on profitability

What are you about???

This is exactly the same negative indicator - the specific power is higher, but wears less, flies closer - therefore ... Efficiency (if I may say so) is lower !!!

Regarding military transport: the aircraft being compared (you would at least read about both) are completely identical in purpose.

My friend - profitability = flight range.

But, range is the same completely unimportant, and most importantly - an unnecessary indicator ...

[dauria]

This is exactly the same negative indicator - the specific power is higher, but wears less, flies closer - therefore ... Efficiency (if I may say so) is lower !!!

You don’t understand ... It flies closer precisely because the engines are more powerful and eat more naturally. But power is just what is needed for bestial conditions. And smoothly and for a long time to accelerate and poorly maneuver on weak (and economical) engines - this is permissible for passenger (and patrol) engines. An airplane is a bunch of compromises between a bunch of conflicting demands. Who guesses in which direction to shift the emphasis, he won.

[seti]

In the course of production, modernization is inevitable and who said it would be easy ..? Yes, I looked "Spaniard" in something better than something worse. But the main thing is that we already have our own basic aircraft of this class and we can already push off from it. Make it easier due to new materials, increase engine power, make changes to the wing. Price matters, as does the loading and maintenance of our facilities and workers. And most importantly, it's time to abandon the outdated An-26. You need to invest and develop your own aircraft industry and actively promote it in the world. While the ruble is weak, you need to use the moment.

[bulvas]

Quote: iConst

Quote: dauria

Specific power (horses per kilogram) was not taken into account. At 112 it is better one and a half times. This is a MILITARY transport aircraft, here the emphasis is not on profitability

What are you about???

This is exactly the same negative indicator - the specific power is higher, but wears less, flies closer - therefore ... Efficiency (if I may say so) is lower !!!

Regarding military transport: the aircraft being compared (you would at least read about both) are completely identical in purpose.

My friend - profitability = flight range.

But, range is the same completely unimportant, and most importantly - an unnecessary indicator ...

Our IL has a much more powerful engine (2800/1975), perhaps from here such different indicators of mass and efficiency.
The engine was made with a margin, the CASA C-295, the engines are apparently more accurately selected, we do not have such an opportunity to create a large line of engines, therefore more universal solutions.

Still, what are the opportunities for using the ground GDP for these aircraft?
In addition, our planes have always been with a reserve of carrying capacity, it is possible that the IL is capable of more

I think so

[iConst]

Quote: bulvas

Our IL has a much more powerful engine (2800/1975), perhaps from here such different indicators of mass and efficiency.
The engine was made with a margin, the CASA C-295, the engines are apparently more accurately selected, we do not have such an opportunity to create a large line of engines, therefore more universal solutions.

“Perhaps, and so what?” Anyway - minus.

Quote: bulvas

Still, what are the opportunities for using the ground GDP for these aircraft?

- That's about the dirt from the Spaniard did not say anything. But it is also a military transport, and perhaps there is the same opportunity.

Quote: bulvas

In addition, our planes have always been with a reserve of carrying capacity, it is possible that the IL is capable of more

Funny - but the numbers then say that it’s not capable. Even with higher engine power - lower carrying capacity (to hell with it - with a range). So the glider is worse.

[bulvas]

Quote: iConst

Quote: bulvas

Our IL ...
The engine was made with a margin, the CASA C-295, the engines are apparently more accurately selected, we do not have such an opportunity to create a large line of engines, therefore more universal solutions.

“Perhaps, and so what?” Anyway - minus.

From the point of view of a specific aircraft - minus, I agree, but from the point of view of the quickest solution to the problem of shortage of aircraft - plus. We are now almost at the beginning of the war - we need everything at once.
I would like to hope that the "Made in Russia" movement will not stall and the plane will be finished.

Quote: iConst

Quote: bulvas

In addition, our planes have always been with a reserve of carrying capacity, it is possible that the IL is capable of more

Funny - but the numbers then say that it’s not capable. Even with higher engine power - lower carrying capacity (to hell with it - with a range). So the glider is worse.

Well, in Russia, the numbers never said everything that really is.
There was always a margin for extreme situations and some mother

It’s clear that these are not engineering categories, but this has always been the case in Russia

[g1v2]

Il112 and are not going to be super-advanced. Its main purpose is import substitution an26. which we have in the WTA is full and in the civilian too. Just as il114 is created for import substitution an24. If there is a demand abroad. then they will become the basis of the lines of already Ilovsk light transport and regional passenger aircraft. If it doesn’t, then it will work for our Defense Ministry and government agencies. Although il 114 has a market of about a hundred an 24 in our airlines, which for already 20 years to all and which it can replace.

[78bor1973]

The aircraft is just beginning to be built, there are no engines yet, and you are already comparing and with what with the C-295! Why not just Caribou?

[mikael]

military transport aviation this is not the gavf here a bunch of other indicators are taken into account in addition to the mass-load ratio it has a vitally important reserve of survivability and strength, it is operated by at least one crew, but in usually more severe conditions, it must also be capable of parachuting by parachute technique it's all extra weight

[dmi.pris1]

There are..Amerizing A-10 attack aircraft

[mult-65]

The warthog is beautiful in his own way.

[Koshak]

Quote: UnclePasha

Small, beautiful and elegant. There are no ugly airplanes !!!

I do not agree. As it happens.





And our Be-12 we in the navy called "aerodynamic disgrace"

[lis-ik]

And I liked the airplane in the first picture, just like in the "Pixar" cartoon "Airplanes".

[mikael]

it happens! they just don't fly

[dsm100]

This is certainly good only IL-112 was supposed to appear in the last century.

[dmi.pris1]

In the last century, all hope was on "An", he worked in this segment of transport workers. "Il" is a different song, and even then it was released in Tashkent.

[Marlen]

And An fraudulently framed us ...

[inkass_98]

I am glad that there are advances in engine building, the question remains in the number of manufactured copies and the availability of imported components in the product.

[FID]

I apologize, but the article is about the engine, not about the plane .... For what are these comments, except inkass_98 .....

[Engineer]

And what is there to discuss? The next version of the mid-60s development engine is presented as an outstanding event for the domestic engine building industry.

[samoletil18]

Quote: SSI

I apologize, but the article is about the engine, not about the plane .... For what are these comments, except inkass_98 .....

I support. Besides the appearance of stands nothing. And the timing, cost, etc.? There are many questions. And about the planes in another source.

[Engineer]

Quote: UnclePasha

There are no ugly airplanes !!!

Not...

[Bort radist]

I don’t agree about the type of aircraft. Not IL and not AN. Some Chizhik Designers know better of course.

[engineer74]

Again, it seems, news from the future, but, this time, from the nearest!

[FID]

Editors! Please be kind to fix: TV7-117ST - TURBOINT, not turbojet engine!

[tinibar]

Quote: seti

A very needed plane. Finally, they dealt with the most important issue - engines. Rather, they started a few years ago - now we see the first results. It remains to establish production and launch the aircraft in series.

Yes, you can rejoice at the first results. But personally, the bitterness of what was lost due to betrayal and stupidity still prevails. And I want the joy of success to quickly eclipse the bitterness of the lost!

[Koshak]

Quote: tinibar

Yes, you can rejoice at the first results. But personally, the bitterness of what was lost due to betrayal and stupidity still prevails. And I want the joy of success to quickly eclipse the bitterness of the lost!

Well, stop pulling your hair out and banging your head against the wall. What was, it was, and "Tsushima" once lost. The main thing is that Russia is being reborn.

[sub307]

Quote: bulvas

The competence level of some scribes is always striking. People do not take up their own business. They would write to themselves about some hangouts, gossip ...

Listen ... smart guys. You yourself at least think, or the main thing is to yell. Go to the "Wiki" for educational programs:
"Turboprop engine is a type of gas turbine engine in which the bulk of the energy of hot gases is used to drive the propeller through a reducing speed reducer, and only a small part of the energy is the jet thrust exhaust. The presence of a reduction gear is due to the need to convert power: a turbine is a high-speed unit with torque, while the propeller shaft requires relatively low rpm, but high torque.
There are two main types of turboprop engines: twin-shaft, or free-turbine (the most common today), and single-shaft ".

In general - "... what to consider as gossips, to work ..." ..., well, etc.

[Genry]

Quote: sub307

Listen ... smart guys. You yourself at least think, or the main thing is to yell.

He came, saw and .... wrote that he did not understand anything.
It was about the fact that the author uses both turboprop and turbojet terms.

[Firstvanguard]

Quote: lis-ik

1
Koshak Today, 10:28 ↑ New
Quote: UnclePasha
Small, beautiful and elegant. There are no ugly airplanes !!! good

I do not agree. As it happens.





And our Be-12 we in the navy called "aerodynamic disgrace"

Ugly beautiful!