Military Review

Deputy proposal: to distribute income from resource extraction among citizens of the Russian Federation

93
The closer the elections came, the more actively the parties exercised in winning the hearts and minds of voters. And in the fight for the voter, as you know, all means are good. One of the miraculous means - a loud initiative, which ultimately can go no further than the initiative, but according to the idea of ​​those who are fighting for deputy chairs and mandates, will attract the attention of the electorate so that the electorate does not sleep. An even stronger measure is election promises, which are no longer even an initiative, but a full-fledged attempt by a candidate to declare his desire and “an early opportunity” to “turn this world around.”


It is proposed to repaint the walls of the Kremlin in white, so that the term “white stone” would not lose its relevance today, then - to increase pensions and wages with the indispensable price reduction, then - “distribute” to each “peasant woman”, then - to hit with a thick layer asphalt on the road from Kolyma to Murmansk, then ...

Due to the fact that in the overwhelming majority of cases, such initiatives and promises remain loud election slogans, you don’t know how seriously you can take a new, loud election initiative - that every citizen of the Russian Federation at the legislative level receives the right on the part of the federal budget revenues from mining. With a similar proposal for consideration by his colleagues made a presentation to the parliamentary faction of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

The deputy group headed by Sergei Obukhov states that “every Russian who has at least 9 work months a year and who has not received unemployment benefits has the right to receive his share. If you suddenly lost your job and received an allowance from the state, then sorry, mate, but this initiative is not for you ... You won’t get golden mountains from the extraction and sale of oil, gas, coal, silver, gold, iron ore, diamonds, rare-earth elements and etc.

Deputy proposal: to distribute income from resource extraction among citizens of the Russian Federation


The initiative group decided to “do much good” for the pensioners. The explanatory note states that the right to income from the state budget in the framework of the extraction and sale of minerals will also be received by pensioners who have worked for at least 5 years.

The authors of the bill:
The draft law not only fully takes into account the limited possibilities of the federal budget and the problems of the Russian economy, but also contains tools for the gradual improvement of the current situation. The size of guaranteed payments is not fixed and depends on a number of factors: the level of federal budget revenues from mining, the number of citizens eligible for profit, and the number of years elapsed since the adoption of the law.


Initially, it is planned to distribute 20% income from resource extraction in the Russian Federation, and then annually distribute among citizens by 2% more.
In other words, by the middle of the century, all 100% of the income from the extraction of minerals would have to be distributed by shares among the owners of Russian passports that fall under the criteria outlined above.

With all due respect to the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, friends, are you serious? The controversy is already in the initiative itself: the limited possibilities of the federal budget and problems in the economy are stated, and right there it is offered to all working Russians and pensioners to transfer certain guaranteed payments. Yeah ...

No - from the point of view of attempts to take care of the people, everything looks very nice - the party is going to realize the right of a citizen to manage Russian resources equally with others (for example, along with top managers of oil companies). I am a citizen, you are a citizen, and he (top manager) of the oil giant is also a citizen, and by law we are all equal in our rights. But only for this thesis to really work, the initiative to “divide” the income from the extraction and sale of the same oil is clearly not enough. The average top manager of a mining company is unlikely to agree with the initiative of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation on equal access to financial resources obtained from mining. But do the initiators of the idea have the tools to convince such a “dissenting” top manager? - big question.

After analyzing the oil and gas revenues of the federal budget, the size of the working population of the country, and the number of pensioners with work experience over 5 years, the authors of the legislative initiative declared: every Russian (one that fits the standard) could receive 12,9 thousand rubles in the next year from the state budget. This sum, Sergei Obukhov & Co., calls the “thirteenth salary” that the state will pay.
Well, let's say ... And what about the embodiment of the initiative, when "you have to" distribute all 100% of the income from resource extraction among citizens? It turns out that a citizen will receive a year, thousands of 80-90 rubles - and let him do what he wants, he does - the state does not need to think, because the income was distributed ... Of these funds, hire a district officer, a doctor, a teacher, throw off to contain museums, theaters, libraries. Do not forget about the army, because, as you know, it is necessary to feed, teach and rearm, so that you do not have to feed, teach and rearm another army ... In this case, this is what is happening: “Dear residents of the apartments of our entrance, the question is the agenda: let's drop the army and education today, or will we not need them this month? .. ”

If this initiative is about protecting the interests of the people, then the authors of the initiative are not confused in terminology. The welfare state does not mean that the role of the state is assumed by each representative of his society individually. After all, the state is exactly the structure, one of the primary tasks of which is the budget balance, the maintenance of the army, police, education, medicine, business promotion, etc. The appeal of the distribution of income from the extraction of resources “among all” frankly gives populism, in addition multiplied by accidental or consciously ignoring the understanding of the state’s role. It would be much more effective if the deputies put forward and implemented initiatives that really improve the mechanisms of development and the economy, and social affairs within the framework of the duties that state officials assume to citizens. If the fulfillment of state responsibilities for the effective use of the same state budget in such husbands is a problem, then you can simply look for work in another field.
Author:
Photos used:
www.gazprom.ru
93 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Same lech
    Same lech 16 September 2016 06: 29
    +7
    Initially, it is planned to distribute 20% income from resource extraction in the Russian Federation, and then annually distribute among citizens by 2% more.
    In other words, by the middle of the century, all 100% of the income from the extraction of minerals would have to be distributed by shares among the owners of Russian passports that fall under the criteria outlined above.


    Fuck ...
    in the entire history of the existence of RUSSIA, none of the rulers has ever done this ...
    why will this rule be violated now?

    The utopia in our conditions and the mentality of the ruling class of officials.
    1. Tatar 174
      Tatar 174 16 September 2016 07: 14
      +12
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      The utopia in our conditions and the mentality of the ruling class of officials.

      100 percent is utopia. Now, if this were attributed to pensioners, it would be nice. And then they could say how the postman Pechkin said: “Maybe I am just starting to live: I’m retiring!” Then Russia would be 1000 percent more attractive all over the world. Utopia, thieves will never allow this ...
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 16 September 2016 08: 08
        +11
        "Deputy proposal: to distribute income from resource extraction among citizens of the Russian Federation"
        It would be better if they made a proposal: not to carry nonsense during the election campaign.
        1. Temples
          Temples 16 September 2016 09: 48
          +13
          Then everyone shouts: "Long live the USSR!"

          Now here is the other extreme.

          Volodin quietly lowers the Communist Party before the election.

          Do you remember - who receives income from the use of mineral resources now?
          Volodin does not write a word about this.

          limited opportunities of the federal budget and problems in the economy are noted

          The government (budget) receives tax from companies that receive income.
          Even this curve initiative does not mean a redistribution of taxes.

          In general, the article - do not vote for the Communist Party.
          Work out or earn.

          Nonsense now flows rivers from all parties and their members.
          Unfortunately, on the fingers you can count really sensible politicians in the Duma.
          But I don’t think it’s worth going down to the level of repeaters.

          Mr. Volodin depicted the people's anger.
          Otherwise, everything seems to suit him in the development of mineral resources and other riches of our Motherland.
          Everything is legal, the mosquito of the nose will not tarnish.
          But the colonels have billions from the air of course. laughing
          And then the Communist Party is to blame?
          No money, but you hold on!
          1. uskrabut
            uskrabut 16 September 2016 11: 30
            +8
            Quote: Temples
            No money, but you hold on!



            And you hear: THERE IS MONEY, BUT YOU DO NOT SEE THEM
            "mother-mother-mother," the echo echoed habitually.
          2. your1970
            your1970 16 September 2016 12: 32
            +2
            60 percent of the budget for the past year with a tail was received from the customs authorities. This is mainly the export duty on hydrocarbons, 30-40 percent is the import duty.
            Tax approximately 20% (or even less) of the budget gives ...
            Will something change globally with industrial production and a shift in the export duty on manufactured goods from hydrocarbons by 2050? Hardly ...
            And then what chiches contain everything that is NOW contained (army / teachers / doctors / pensioners / ....) on export duties?
            Rhetorical question..........

            Shouting "take away and divide !!!!!!!!!!!!" easy - where can you get the money to feed the country? See country 404 ...
            A model example .......
          3. Volodin
            16 September 2016 12: 56
            0
            Quote: Temples
            In general, the article - do not vote for the Communist Party.
            Work out or earn.
            Otherwise, everything seems to suit him in the development of mineral resources and other riches of our Motherland.

            And it seems that the respected Khramov is satisfied when the candidates, who, it must be said, have been sitting in power for the first time, carry a similar utopian heresy, and he is ready to pretend that he believes in it. Work or earn?

            If you are interested, then I have a positive attitude to the ideas of the same Communist Party, if these ideas are feasible. And this idea is from a series of populism - "everyone in the apartment by April 1". They suggested ... You (at least the Communist Party, at least EP, at least someone else) at least take a step for implementation - then it will make sense.
          4. Penzuck
            Penzuck 16 September 2016 13: 45
            +3
            Quote: Temples
            The government (budget) receives tax from companies that receive income.

            Excise tax is part of the Income. Revenue minus Cost equals profit. Profit minus income tax is equal to net profit after tax. Excise tax + go to the budget ...
            And comrades, who are not comrades at all, want to distribute INCOME. 20% and then 100%. Those. Moreover, excise taxes and taxes will be distributed to people, as well as the salaries of the miners will not pay. Salaries are part of the revenue structure, Karl! crying
            1. gladcu2
              gladcu2 16 September 2016 23: 37
              +1
              Penzuk.

              Yes buddy ... you're right. In this case, a proposal was received to pay for living standards at the expense of state revenues. And the state, as it is known badly or well, but performs the function of social protection. And the more revenue the state has, the better and easier it is to carry out this function.

              This is an offer from the realm of hidden deception. What would people who are not very versed in the structure of society led. Divorce suckers, in short

              Find this deputy and roughly punish. Here in Ukraine there are worthy ways of cleaning up contamination through a garbage can.
          5. ARES623
            ARES623 16 September 2016 21: 10
            0
            "Do you remember - who gets income from the use of mineral resources now?
            Volodin does not write a word about this. "

            And we all receive in the form of state services. About half the cost of a liter of fuel goes to the budget in the form of taxes and excise taxes. Each oil company pays MET (mineral extraction tax), as well as many other tax deductions: on property, on profit, duties, etc. Believe me, this is not a small amount. And what is being offered for division is the remaining profit of the enterprise, obtained not for selling oil itself, but for the work of finding, raising, cleaning it ... a lot of things, transportation. This is so short. The Communist Party proposes the idea of ​​Mr. Sharikov - to take everything away and share. Already it was. How did it start and where did it turn out? - remember. What are public services? It’s also clear - managerial, security and defense, educational, medical, etc.
      2. tobacco grower
        tobacco grower 16 September 2016 09: 24
        +2
        election tale for suckers
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 16 September 2016 12: 28
          +4
          Quote: tobacco
          election tale for suckers

          Well, yes, especially if you take into account the fact that "fuckers" monthly unfasten 13% of taxes on all types of earnings, which should go to payments of "pensions, free medicine and education" and at the same time receive - everything is paid, moreover, losing the indexation of pensions ...
          So there is common sense in the program for the nationalization of income from the sale of minerals, at least in the fact that not to invest the money received in American bonds and pay multimillion-dollar salaries of exceptionally "effective" managers, but to let them on social programs, which does not provide for payment to everyone in monetary terms, but provides for payment to each of the state services. You just need to modify the program.
          1. Volodin
            16 September 2016 12: 58
            +4
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            So in the program of nationalization of income from the sale of minerals there is common sense,


            Yes, the point is that the idea itself is wonderful. But the initiators themselves have been sitting in power for the first time and recall this idea only two weeks before the elections.
            1. Nyrobsky
              Nyrobsky 16 September 2016 17: 54
              +1
              Quote: Volodin
              Yes, the point is that the idea itself is wonderful. But the initiators themselves have been sitting in power for the first time and recall this idea only two weeks before the elections.

              They are sitting, but due to the fact that even if the Communist Party, LDPR and SR factions unite, the majority of the votes in the Duma still belong to the EP, it’s clear that this idea cannot be realized a priori.
              So it comes up (idea) only on the eve of the election.
              If this time it is possible to cut the number of United Russia deputies to the real possibility of other parties to "block or implement" this or that law at least in the coalition bloc, then the chances that the government, in addition to the interests of big business and bankers, will suddenly notice the interests of the people will increase.
              1. your1970
                your1970 16 September 2016 19: 18
                0
                from 1995 to 2003, the Communists had 30-25% of the vote in the Duma, for example, a union with the Liberal Democratic Party would give 50% of the vote .....
                Did this help the country ?????
          2. Penzuck
            Penzuck 16 September 2016 13: 52
            0
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            Well, yes, especially if you take into account the fact that "fuckers" monthly unfasten 13% of taxes on all types of earnings, which should go to payments of "pensions, free medicine and education" and at the same time receive - everything is paid, moreover, losing the indexation of pensions ...

            Dissonance, however. Pension is not taxed ....
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            So in the nationalization program of income from the sale of minerals there common sense

            wassat Punches on rzhach ....
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            You just need to modify the program.

            ... and rewrite economic theory to Devils! The Nobel Pride is WAITING FOR YOU! fool .
            1. Nyrobsky
              Nyrobsky 16 September 2016 15: 04
              +1
              Quote: Penzuck
              Dissonance, however. Pension is not taxed ...

              Have you learned to delve into what you read? It is written in Russian - "all kinds of earnings". It’s clear that the pension does not apply to earnings. [
          3. ARES623
            ARES623 17 September 2016 09: 42
            +1
            "Well, yes, especially if you take into account the fact that" fuckers "monthly release 13% of taxes on all types of earnings, which should go to pay" pensions, free medicine and education "and at the same time receive - everything is paid, besides, without indexing pensions. "

            What did you personally pay for? For the road? For the education of children? There is no need to talk about medicine, everything is not simple there - first we will ruin our own health (passivity, alcohol, tobacco, drugs, self-medication and going to the hospital when everything is really bad), and then we begin to load bumps on everyone around - doctors do not treat, medicines are expensive, after sick leave they lost their jobs. With all this, for the year for insurance, sheer pennies are deducted from the payroll. Conclusion: where to get an MRI for several tens of millions in order to see a broken driver with an accident, who was either drunk, or being drunk, arrogant, without the caution required for a driving qualification. Then the Communist Party cries from the TV - FAP was closed !!! And what should it contain? If a lot of funds are spent on the broken and crippled by their own, or by our gullibility. Everything is like in Ukraine - we are holier than the Pope, but everyone around us is to blame, we did not save the "suicide". The payment to the university is even more interesting - at first we "hammered" on the children, the child after the school course due to omissions and parental inattention in the word x ... th makes five mistakes, but what about him, an idiot, on an engineer (doctor, specialist GMU - not important) to learn? I do not know what Mr. Nyrobsky is to you, to answer, I would probably advise you to engage in philosophy, logic, in order to learn to identify the cause-and-effect relationships of events, or something .... The Central Bank promises to open a website to eliminate financial illiteracy, probably worth digging in there. Some kind of reasoning is superficial, evil, illiterate, but arrogant. Like - we are here tearing veins for the Motherland, and there at the top stupid traitors settled ?! I dare to assure you, there are people like you, but with experience and knowledge, life is just much more complicated. And who said that the population of a country at war should not endure hardships and hardships. You have to understand that a WAR has been declared on us for several years now, and the fact that we do not notice this on our stomachs is the merit of the same government, the President, and the Duma too. Something like this. No offense...
            1. De laert
              De laert 17 September 2016 17: 43
              +2
              In fact, people pay far not 13%. 13 percent is only income, then 22% in the PFR, 5,1% of the MHIF, 2,9% of the FSS. Total 43% of earnings. Plus 18% VAT paid by the buyer of almost any product. Plus property taxes, fines, duties, etc. It was estimated that on average 52% of a person’s income goes to the state. As for education, it is completely conditionally free. Parents purchase textbooks, consumables to school. Permanent repair fees, etc.
              I will not write anything about the wrong way of life, show me where it is different ?!
              And yet, - can I write for a long time about the salaries of top managers of state corporations, just the point of this? It has always been so and always will be. Whatever comes to power, anyone will enjoy the situation.
              1. ARES623
                ARES623 19 September 2016 12: 55
                0
                "In fact, people pay far from 13%. 13% is only income, then 22% in the Pension Fund, 5,1% MHIF, 2,9% FSS. Total 43% from earnings. Plus 18% VAT, which is paid by almost any buyer Plus property taxes, fines, duties, etc. It has been estimated that an average of 52% of a person's income goes to the state. "

                When you sell your work to an employer, you get information about the "salary" for your position. And you agree to this figure. This figure is your income, from which your withholding agent pays 13% tax on your income. There is no need for people to rosin their brains with the MHIF, FSS, Pension Fund of Russia and other deductions that are paid by your employer, and which then, by the way, are partially returned to you in the form of pensions, medical services under compulsory health insurance, partially paid by the budget, plus a small amount from the payroll of your position listed by the employer.
                Parents buy textbooks at 99% only when your child slammed the textbook issued for free (you probably do not know ...). Paints are handed over for repairs to paint obscene words written by our children on different surfaces. And the fact that somewhere they do not monitor their health at all does not at all make our bad habits a less stupid behavior. Ukraine, over the whole winter of the 14th, galloped with pots on her head, not to take an example from them !?
                1. De laert
                  De laert 19 September 2016 22: 11
                  0
                  I did not try to rosin the brain. He answered, in principle, to you and another commentator about the 13% tax.
                  Judging by your logic, 18% of VAT is not paid by you when you buy the goods, but by the seller. No, technically he pays, but from your pocket.
                  So is the salary. Officially, you get the amount that the employer designates, but in the form of taxes the state does not spend 13%, but 43%.
                  I don’t want to argue about schools, probably depends on the leadership in schools.
      3. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 16 September 2016 10: 39
        +1
        Deputy proposal: to distribute income from resource extraction among citizens of the Russian Federation
        I remember, it was already ... I "vouchers" invested in (damn, I forgot where!) profitably exchanged on the market for food and jeans ... who saved it now, as soon as memory only works. winked
      4. Penzuck
        Penzuck 16 September 2016 13: 38
        0
        Quote: Tatar 174
        100 percent is utopia. Now, if this were attributed to pensioners, it would be nice.

        I repeat, Brad!
    2. Aleks221
      Aleks221 16 September 2016 08: 16
      0
      This is not a utopia, but a terrorist attack, they will receive money, muslims that they did not see even the North, but only traded and stole.
      1. Penzuck
        Penzuck 16 September 2016 13: 54
        +2
        Quote: Aleks221
        This is not utopia, but terrorist attack , money will be received, muslims that they did not see the North, but only traded and stole.

        Your comment looks more like extremism than the ill-conceivedness of the proposal "deputies" ...
    3. sub307
      sub307 16 September 2016 08: 59
      +3
      "... you can just look for a job in a different field."
      Yes, "right now" ..., they only leave their parliamentary "chairs" under the threat of death.
    4. Finches
      Finches 16 September 2016 09: 53
      +1
      Populism is our everything! Strengthens before the election and calms down immediately after ..., receiving the first monetary allowance in the Duma of the new convocation ...! laughing
    5. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 16 September 2016 10: 40
      0
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      in the entire history of the existence of RUSSIA, none of the rulers has ever done this ...

      Ha! You are wrong, and the "vouchers"? wassat
      1. AUL
        AUL 16 September 2016 12: 25
        +2
        Double, even triple stupidity!
        1. Who now believes in election songs? Only clinical oligophrenics. Thank God we’ve already seen enough, heard enough and know the value of these promises.
        2. From the point of view of the state economy, giving out at least 20% of gas income is a complete disaster for the country. And so officials steal everything, and then also distribute rednecks to the cattle?
        3. Well, and the main thing. What, our oligarchs will miss such a law? Yeah, shchazz! They there, go, paused with laughter, having heard such nonsense.
        And these "wise ... retsy" are running for power!
    6. Penzuck
      Penzuck 16 September 2016 13: 37
      0
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Fuck ...
      in the entire history of the existence of RUSSIA, none of the rulers has ever done this ...
      why will this rule be violated now?

      The utopia in our conditions and the mentality of the ruling class of officials.

      Sorry, but nonsense.
    7. EvgNik
      EvgNik 16 September 2016 15: 03
      0
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      in the entire history of the existence of RUSSIA, none of the rulers has ever done this ...
      why will this rule be violated now?

      Why so. Remember the USSR. And there was not everything perfect, but at least sought.
    8. gladcu2
      gladcu2 16 September 2016 15: 55
      0
      The idiocy is complete.

      This deputy needs to be shot for such proposals.

      Explain.

      In economics, there is the principle of "each as possible, each according to his work." Under capitalism, this principle is violated, it sounds like this: "from each as possible, to each according to the salary." This salary does not match your efforts. Those. under capitalism you don't have to pay extra money. This is the economic system. The goal of the system is the enrichment of units, at the expense of the impoverishment of the absolute majority.

      With the proposal of this deputy, the main principle is violated, "from each as possible." This means they kill the economy by making it parasitic.

      If this wise guy proposed, for example, the state guaranteed control of receiving a salary according to work, then yes, then it is fair.

      Do not listen to scammers.
      1. gladcu2
        gladcu2 16 September 2016 23: 47
        0
        Payment should go according to work, taking into account technological growth. This is an average of 3 times more than in all countries at present. It is clearer to explain that worldwide payment is on average three times lower than it could be. This allows technological development, which is not taken into account, but is spent on enriching the minority. Such an economic system.

        Often, the state goes to meet entrepreneurs and lowers taxes if part of the salary goes to the pension fund. Well, etc.

        But in no case should the squandering of the state be allowed. State, this is your army and navy. However, it is also embezzlers the same, but it is fixable.
    9. Zefr
      Zefr 23 September 2016 02: 17
      0
      none of the rulers ever did this.
      What do you mean, did not? And medicine is free, and education? And the apartments? Where did they come from? With total rent, nowhere else.
  2. Kostya Andreev
    Kostya Andreev 16 September 2016 07: 08
    +6
    I look and read the election promises, and ask the question, where do they take so many idiots and who is this nonsense for?
    1. SteelRatTV
      SteelRatTV 16 September 2016 09: 13
      0
      Yes, the same ones that "dragged" from vouchers! fellow hi
    2. One of you
      One of you 16 September 2016 10: 39
      +1
      Yes, everything is simple - the election nonsense is designed for you and me, and I must say frankly, someone takes it seriously.
      Here in the week I talked with one of my friends, who quite seriously substantiated the need to vote for Parnassus and his second number, Maltsev.
      By the way, this acquaintance with higher education believes in Maltsev’s promises. Here it is.
    3. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 16 September 2016 10: 44
      0
      Quote: Kostya Andrei
      I look and read the election promises, and ask the question, where do they take so many idiots and who is this nonsense for?

      beyond the Moscow Ring Road ...
      1. AUL
        AUL 16 September 2016 12: 35
        +2
        Do you think that beyond the Moscow Ring Road there are more idiots per capita than inside it? You are mistaken! There, naivety from people disappears much faster than in the capital, the living conditions there are a little more insular. And there is no special faith for any vocalists. True, the old women, by inertia, vote for Zyu, and the youth, for fun, for Zhirik.
  3. Waltasar
    Waltasar 16 September 2016 07: 08
    +3
    Oh, these tales, oh, these storytellers ...
  4. 24rus
    24rus 16 September 2016 07: 12
    +3
    It’s not necessary to distribute the profit from the extraction of minerals between citizens, what kind of emirate-Turkmen kooky, it is necessary that the state budget receive them And preferably 100%. and then the money will be enough for the entire social network
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 16 September 2016 07: 26
      +5
      Quote: 24rus
      it is necessary that the state budget receive them

      It is necessary to nationalize the extraction of ALL minerals.
      1. Penzuck
        Penzuck 16 September 2016 13: 57
        +2
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        It is necessary to nationalize the extraction of ALL minerals.

        Nationalize profits and privatize losses? tongue
  5. dmi.pris1
    dmi.pris1 16 September 2016 07: 12
    +6
    It's like obliging the oligarchs to transfer all their personal profits, together with the salary and the "golden parachute" to the citizens of Russia.
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 16 September 2016 11: 00
      +1
      They will succeed.

      We won’t be able to, so help!
  6. Alex_59
    Alex_59 16 September 2016 07: 23
    +6
    I’m just studying this issue for myself - where do oil revenues go? And they partly go to the budget, and partly to the stabilization fund (now these are two funds - reserve and national welfare). What the Communists want is not clear. Withdraw money from funds and distribute to the people? On the one hand, strangely enough, it’s not the most stupid undertaking: stimulating demand is economic growth. But God himself ordered the Communists to study the activities of their leaders. For example, Stalin. Which, having no oil revenues and not distributing money from the budget to the population, was more reasonable, he took up industrialization and buying up technologies. In 1928 there was a collective farm, in 1938 (after 10 years!) There was some kind of industrial power. Ford bought aircraft engines, tank building (Christie, Vickers) from the Italians turbine technology and shipbuilding, the Germans and instruments and optics, and much more. How is it that our servants of the people do not have a puzzle - import substitution - oil revenues - buying up technologies around the world? I do not like Stalin - look at China. A true communist technology vacuum cleaner from around the world. But the intellectual level of our rulers is not the same - either in a small capsule or hand out (read - drink).
    1. guzik007
      guzik007 16 September 2016 07: 53
      +5
      I’m just studying this issue for myself - where do oil revenues go? And they partly go to the budget, and partly to the stabilization fund (now these are two funds - reserve and national welfare).
      -----------------------------------------
      You forgot the third component of expenses, a tiny part appeared shortly in the apartment of a platinum colonel. And here I’m thinking: if you shut off this tap, the losses from which do not lead to the collapse of the state, then this money could be thrown to pensioners and to accounts only born citizens of Russia.
      ... Chet broke me through the fantasy, getting old, choli: =)
  7. CONTROL
    CONTROL 16 September 2016 07: 31
    +2
    Yeah, so that's who the USSR collapsed!
    There was a Union! - an ingot, one might say - a nugget of precious metal ...
    ... and we will cut it into ... tsat pieces! And sawdust - into the trash! Waste, panimash! ...
  8. Pacifist
    Pacifist 16 September 2016 07: 52
    0
    Booty rent is populist nonsense. To do this and the end of the country. More precisely, a strong country. With all the desire to get a piece, one must understand that the country's defense capacity is based on the distribution of funds received from resources for science, education, defense, and health care. I do not feel the slightest desire to sit like a golum and in a languid voice say "my darling" over this rent, at the same time watching the country turn into Guinea.
    1. MstislavHrabr
      MstislavHrabr 18 September 2016 22: 24
      0
      To destroy an idea, it must be brought to the point of absurdity!
      The very idea of ​​natural rent from mining is not so bad .. For example, you can cancel the pension tax and replace it with a tax on the extraction of minerals (oil, gas, coal, timber, ore) .- About-10%. And to pay the same pension to everyone. (No length of service, minimum, 10 years, two minimums, 20 three minimums, etc.).
      And in the state. corporations, I would also introduce restrictions on the difference in wages between the lower and upper echelons of workers no higher than 10 times!
      The worker gets 20 thousand. Get 200 thousand. Or increase his salary ... Work efficiently so that there is enough for everyone ...
      A charge. pay teachers and doctors to pay the average wage of workers in state corporations.
  9. APASUS
    APASUS 16 September 2016 08: 03
    +3
    This is the hocus pocus before the election!
    How many beautiful and smart things can now be heard from the lips of candidates, take at least the Liberal Democratic Party, the Communist Party, United Russia. But some are in the Duma for 5-6 terms and it feels like they were born there, but only elections will be held and everything is forgotten!
    1. uskrabut
      uskrabut 16 September 2016 11: 24
      +1
      Quote: APASUS
      But only elections will be held and everything is forgotten!


      Therefore, elections must be held once a quarter !!! wassat
  10. Gardamir
    Gardamir 16 September 2016 08: 04
    +3
    as I understand it, on the eve of the elections to show which db in the Communist Party?
    I'm much closer to such a quote from the Internet
    United Russia.

    What prevented this party in the previous 16 years from doing what it promises to do in the next five? Probably interfered with high oil prices and bad boyars, who united in the United Russia party and prevent Putin from saving Russia from United Russia, supporting Putin in his fight against United Russia
    1. uskrabut
      uskrabut 16 September 2016 11: 22
      0
      Quote: Gardamir
      bad boyars who united in the United Russia party and prevent Putin from saving Russia from United Russia, supporting Putin in his fight against United Russia



      In fact, everything is not the same as in reality. wassat
  11. NACC
    NACC 16 September 2016 08: 19
    +3
    Nationalization by the state and everything in the budget, definitely.
  12. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 16 September 2016 08: 31
    +3
    These calls and promises can be answered with a joke:
    “You promised to marry me!”
    - You never know what I promised you.
    Some promise to return Crimea and immediately join the European "family". Others take everything away and divide equally. Still others ... etc. In a word, elections.
  13. Masya masya
    Masya masya 16 September 2016 08: 31
    +5
    Expropriation of expropriators ... laughing
  14. AlekSap
    AlekSap 16 September 2016 08: 57
    +2
    P ... not toss the bags!
  15. GEV67
    GEV67 16 September 2016 09: 23
    +2
    Oh and make a fool of our brother ... wassat
  16. Vovan Petrov
    Vovan Petrov 16 September 2016 10: 32
    0
    This is a sentence from a set of idiots.
  17. Ruswolf
    Ruswolf 16 September 2016 10: 43
    +1
    Why distribute income?
    Maybe just stop the price increase?
    Distribution of income ...... Why is it associated with the dough cut between the powers that be.
    1. AUL
      AUL 16 September 2016 12: 51
      +1
      Why distribute income?
      Maybe just stop the price increase?

      And how do you propose to do this? Go to any market. The prices there are set by an Azeri or a Chechen who "holds" the market. And go talk him into not increasing prices! He takes a percentage off them. And this is the case in our entire economy, because our economy is not a market one, but a criminal one.
  18. maxim1987
    maxim1987 16 September 2016 10: 45
    0
    Quote: Kostya Andrei
    I look and read the election promises, and ask the question, where do they take so many idiots and who is this nonsense for?


    Aha! Especially "happy" about Comrade Maxim and 10 Stalinist blows laughing
    1. Ruswolf
      Ruswolf 16 September 2016 11: 03
      0
      maxim1987
      I look and read the election promises, and ask the question, where do they take so many idiots and who is this nonsense for?

      Aha! Especially "happy" about Comrade Maxim and 10 Stalinist blows

      Laughter, laughter, but I am not surprised more than those who promise. And how seriously people discuss, prove to each other who is better! Who is more honest ....
      Already scared for such a consciousness!
      1. AUL
        AUL 16 September 2016 12: 55
        0
        You look at the candidate’s banner, and his eyes are so honest, honest ... And the slogan is so alluring! I’d just take it and choose it right there!
  19. Engineer engineer
    Engineer engineer 16 September 2016 10: 57
    +1
    Quote: GEV67
    Oh and make a fool of our brother ...

    Sister too! Everyone is fooled. Except me - I do not believe!
  20. V.ic
    V.ic 16 September 2016 11: 10
    +1
    Elections - elections deputies _ .. dory
    Oligarchs - the SVL. .
    The governors of rvachi ...
    We are the voters of this 3,14 & / most / "brethren"
  21. uskrabut
    uskrabut 16 September 2016 11: 19
    +1
    Well, in Brunei, it turns out, despite the fact that it is a monarchy.
    But I wanted to offer another, more achievable. All minerals belong to our many millionth and multinational people, i.e. Russian Federation - you can’t argue with that. Then, companies engaged in mining should be paid for mining (costs + rate of return), and everything mined belongs to the state, therefore, the proceeds from the sale of all this should go to the budget. Logical, understandable, transparent. I think the income budget will grow at least 3 times. Then medicine and education should become completely free, and utility bills should be reduced to a minimum. And then the price of gas under 6000 rubles per 10000 cubic meters. or 6 rubles per 1 cubic meter Here either the price is inadequate or the population needs to be indexed every 10 salaries, pensions, scholarships.
    1. atalef
      atalef 17 September 2016 09: 48
      0
      Quote: uskrabut
      But I wanted to offer another, more achievable. All minerals belong to our many millionth and multinational people, i.e. Russian Federation - you can’t argue with that

      You bet where it is written - about the people?
      Quote: uskrabut
      Then companies engaged in mining should be paid for mining (costs + rate of return),

      And what rate of return would you set?
      Quote: uskrabut
      therefore, the proceeds from the sale of all this should go to the budget. Logical, understandable, transparent.

      To the budget and transparently laughing
      Well, you old man bent
      Quote: uskrabut
      I think the income budget will grow at least 3 times

      Why not in 4 or 10? Or maybe it will decrease - as in Venezuela
      Quote: uskrabut
      Then medicine and education should become completely free, and utility bills should be reduced to a minimum.

      Like in Kuwait wink
  22. RPG_
    RPG_ 16 September 2016 11: 37
    0
    With all desire, this will not work. After all, Nadia also needs to feed and dress the army.
    1. Berg berg
      Berg berg 16 September 2016 11: 51
      +3
      The current will not work because they will lay down with bones, but they will not give back the loot!
      1. anat anatov
        anat anatov 21 September 2017 07: 20
        0
        You are right, they won’t give it back, because the Jews know that our people are drunk, lazy, and therefore they are in power, etc.
  23. Danil Laryon
    Danil Laryon 16 September 2016 11: 44
    0
    All the same, they all only know how to use language.
  24. Berg berg
    Berg berg 16 September 2016 11: 50
    0
    There is only one question for the article, why all these 100% are received by a small handful of tycoons, and for some reason the state does not soar and the army does not suffer. The conversation then went about those 100% that the top tycoons grabbed at by the people!
  25. ProkletyiPirat
    ProkletyiPirat 16 September 2016 12: 10
    0
    the one who offered to distribute this money urgently needs to be checked for involvement in "foreign agents" because it will cost a penny for a person, and bridges \ roads \ ports \ etc will not be built with this money. I'd rather not get these 100 rubles a year, but a couple of metro stations will be opened in my city.
  26. Vyacheslav Konstantinovich Starodubov
    Vyacheslav Konstantinovich Starodubov 16 September 2016 12: 21
    +1
    This I say FOURTH (!) CENTURY (!)!

    "" TO EVERYONE EQUAL SHARE IN EVERY NATURAL RESOURCE "©. "

    (without any conditions)

    http://maxpark.com/community/7668/content/5123807

    Regarding the irony -

    “Dear residents of the apartments of our entrance, the question is on the agenda: will we throw off the army and education today, or will we not need them this month? ..”

    So it MUST be!
  27. Former battalion commander
    Former battalion commander 16 September 2016 15: 08
    +1
    Well, the stinky little article! Just rushing thieves. ETOGES it is necessary that someone is farting TO TAKE power holding such a fat feeder. Yes! The current Russian government is akin to a gang of thieves. We will drive the loot beyond the hillock, let it be taken there, but we WILL NOT GIVE IT to our fellow citizens!
    1. anat anatov
      anat anatov 21 September 2017 07: 17
      0
      which was required to prove! it’s sad that they ceased to count us “for people”)) We are to blame for ourselves, that the Jews above us + grabbed our bowels, etc. It’s time for us to wake up!
  28. atalef
    atalef 17 September 2016 09: 44
    0
    Freebie !!!!
    good good
    1. anat anatov
      anat anatov 21 September 2017 07: 15
      0
      and our "people" love freebies, they will sell their souls, relatives and neighbors, and it’s not for nothing that the people * live in poverty)
  29. mihai_md2003
    mihai_md2003 18 September 2016 03: 10
    0
    Such initiatives are very offensive. Do they really think that the electorate is so dumb that they believe in it? Who are they holding us for?
    1. anat anatov
      anat anatov 21 September 2017 07: 14
      0
      wink for whom are you holding? for biomass)) only here you can yap like dogs. We are not in the emirate, etc., but in a drunk, lazy Russia)) Jews go to distribute sweets to you to drown the choir to vote for "United Russia", it’s funny and sad , absurdly) hee ... hee ... hee..artists to bleat from a burnt theater, and the whole country is "theater") What a nation, such a country! thank the Jews, while you were still thrown out of apartments, houses) Read them TORU and descend to the sinful land) These dogs have not been in Russia for 7 years. The people are to blame for the fact that the dogs leaked to power, to the state educational institution, etc.))
  30. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 18 September 2016 13: 16
    0
    Gentlemen, 90 thousand a year is just over 7 thousand a month! And so that everything becomes paid! And we will throw off the army like in Maidania? The Communist Party of the Russian Federation burns "not childishly". Populists are irresponsible. They have already missed their chance, there will be no reincarnation!
    1. anat anatov
      anat anatov 21 September 2017 07: 08
      0
      wink moved their brains) it’s like a Communist Party, our king gave them an idea, a sweetie! Soon the people will live like emirates and other oil countries) hee ... hee ... funny and stupid, the Jews will let us live in peace! .. The people themselves are to blame, because such country, fools and lazy + drunkards)))
  31. Rostislav
    Rostislav 22 September 2016 16: 10
    0
    I read this sentence and immediately remembered:
    "Who is worse than a fool? He himself, with initiative."
  32. Zefr
    Zefr 23 September 2016 02: 14
    0
    As long as it has already been proposed, all natural resources belong to the state! Do you want to develop oil? Win a tender, whoever offers less or with better conditions will develop it. And the income from the sale is to the state. And not as it is now - all to Miller, but to the state a little taxes. And that’s not all. For example, it is well known that VAT is paid back.
  33. anat anatov
    anat anatov 21 September 2017 07: 04
    +1
    Utopia)) It’s funny and sad! Thieves and villains from the government completely lost their conscience, but the Russian people are to blame for everything, that they put the Jews in power, in all state agencies, media, etc. It’s disgrace! See the gang’s election * Russia "! Alas, we are not united, nonsense. We are not in the Arab countries where S is distributed among citizens, because they live, prosper, and do not exist as we are. It’s time for you to scratch your turnips. Zhids in Russia was not 300 years old, our kings chased these dogs over the Black Sea! Wake up fools! Go, vote once again for them, for the Jewish rule!
  34. anat anatov
    anat anatov 21 September 2017 07: 27
    0
    A drunken country, fools and lazy people, because you are lured to the polls, and for freebies you will sell your soul, your mother)) because you live richly, you enslave from morning till night, hee ... hee ...)) right now you will live like in the emirates, hee ... hee ..., bad people and all this is sad, it’s a shame that the Jews were put into power, they seized all our resources)) And you just have to yap and yap, which you know is nature Russian, so we live another 100 years in the mud, etc. 95% of schoolchildren, our sick children, this is the end, if we do not expel the Jewish scum from the state institution, we have not had them in Russia for 300 years))