The new UN report on the number of victims of the civil war in Ukraine

Today in the United Nations presented another document on the situation of human rights in Ukraine, which reflects the number of victims of the armed conflict in the south-east of the country. The UN mission, which recently conducted an analysis of Ukrainian events, concluded that since the beginning of the conflict 9640 people died and 22431 people were injured.

It is reported that we are talking about registering the dead and wounded, not only among the military, but also among the civilian population. At the same time, the UN does not provide data on how many correspond to the dead and wounded servicemen and representatives of the so-called “volunteer battalions”, and which to civilian victims for the entire period of the civil war.

However, the exact number of dead and wounded civilians in the period from May to September of this year is noted. According to the statistics provided by the UN Commission, 28 people died during this period, and 160 were injured.

These data differ from the police data of the territory of the Donetsk region, which is controlled by Kiev. On Facebook, the head of the Donetsk region GU State Police, Vyacheslav Abroskin, writes that from January to August of this year an 21 civilian died in the region, an 94 man was injured.

Comments

[katalonec2014]

How much underestimated the data.
The Americans initially said that 3-4 thousand is permissible, the limit is exceeded, it was simply underestimated.

[cniza]

Nothing, the junta will answer for everything, but for the UN it’s just statistics and they don’t give a damn until they push one place.

[The black]

The UN mission, which recently conducted an analysis of Ukrainian events, came to the conclusion that since the beginning of the conflict, 9640 people died and 22431 people were injured.

But what about the three divisions of the Airborne Forces, the entire staff of the GRU (with families), the army of Buryat divers and the brigade of armored militia? They didn’t count them for people?

[vovanpain]

9640 people died and 22431 people were injured.

Well, of course, these are underestimated data, the warring parties have always underestimated their losses, and the enemy has been overstated, but one thing unites everyone, the plan to reduce their own population for the glory of the junta mattresses is fulfilled, dodges.

[AdekvatNICK]

the underestimation of losses has always occurred by all warring parties, so there is no truth to be found.

[APASUS]

Quote: AdekvatNICK

understatement of losses has always occurred by all warring parties always. So there is no truth to be found

That's why it’s sometimes interesting to read their press.

Sensational materials today published by the German edition of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung (weekly app FAZ). The publication presents data from German intelligence reporting on the real number of victims of the bloody confrontation in Ukraine. German intelligence reports that according to its employees, the figures for casualties reported by the United Nations are about 10 times lower than real. According to the newspaper, only 50 people have died in Ukraine since the conflict began. The publication reports that neither the Kiev data, nor the data of specialists of the United Nations, are trustworthy, since they do not closely reflect real losses in the south-east of Ukraine.

And this is February 8, 2015

[aszzz888]

And then what? Can we wait for the next UN report in 2017? Not the UN, but an accounting office working for merikatos and Co.

[Hubun]

Did the UN really recognize that there is a civil war in Ukraine?

[You Vlad]

They call it conflict.

[Baloo]

The numbers are underestimated, where does the data come from?
Anyway, the losses are approaching the Afghan ones.

[vitaz]

the head of the GU police of Donetsk region Vyacheslav Abroskin

And what do they have the Donetsk Mayor of?

[vovanpain]

Quote: vitaz

the head of the GU police of Donetsk region Vyacheslav Abroskin

And what do they have the Donetsk Mayor of?

There is, of course, like the AKP prosecutor in Kuev.

[whack]

You will not believe it, but ALL administrative resources of Donetsk and Lugansk regions are functioning. Only in the territory of dill. Donetsk court for example in Mariupol

[Gormenghast]

Chikatilo 53 victims; shot.

Poroshenko - 10000 victims - the president of Svidomo; oligarch, friend of Obama and Merkel.

(??)

[Ruswolf]

Gormenghast Chikatilo 53 victims; shot.

Also underestimate how the UN
In the Chikatilo case, 17 or 18 people were shot. Until he himself was caught!

[Mountain shooter]

Compared to losses in Syria or Iraq, this is not enough. But these are our brothers, killed in the internecine war for the glory of "Pin.dosii". We will not forget, we will not forgive.

[avg-mgn]

No matter how anyone understates what, and the figures are scary, it’s true it’s not clear how they appeared, who counted and from which barn books they were taken.

[Sotskiy]

But what about the 50000-man tsyferka kindly provided to the "world community" by the German intelligence service BND?

[whack]

Apparently this is very close to the truth, if only in Deb.Kotl on a vskidka visually hundreds of three two hundredths. This is not to count how much they burned in the crematorium. And how many of them swam in Mius? And the airport, and Nikishino. And Illovaysk ...?

[Donhapa]

Quote: whacked

Apparently this is very close to the truth, if only in Deb.Kotl on a vskidka visually hundreds of three two hundredths. This is not to count how much they burned in the crematorium. And how many of them swam in Mius? And the airport, and Nikishino. And Illovaysk ...?

But there is our Slavic people ...

[evge-malyshev]

It seems that all these figures are sucked from the finger, especially in terms of civilian casualties. Ukrainians shell the DNI day and night, but there are no losses? It can not be...

[Ruswolf]

I don’t understand, is the phrase "civil war" an official translation of the UN statement, or is it the desired wording in this matter?

[Mwg]

I wonder who gets the UN information? If the current authorities, then everything is clear about the UN. Although, about the UN, and so everything is clear ...