Media: Fire tests of the Sarmat rocket engine successfully completed

The fire tests of the 1 th stage of a Sarmat ballistic missile have been successfully completed, TASS message source in the Russian defense industry.

“The last series of fire tests was successful, technical problems were eliminated”,

said the source.

“Now we are preparing technical documentation, which is scheduled to be completed in November. According to the most optimistic forecasts, the Sarmat can be tested in November-December this year, ”he added.

But even in this case, according to the interlocutor, “flight design tests of a new intercontinental ballistic missile can begin no earlier than the end of the first quarter of the 2017 of the year.”

He noted that currently the lag in the Sarmat program is at least 7 months.

Help Agency: The “Sarmat” ICBM is intended to replace the Voyevoda P-36М2 rocket. The payload of the new rocket is expected to reach ten tons (versus approximately 8,75 tons of its predecessor). Adoption of "Sarmat" is planned at the end of 2018 of the year. "

Comments

[Muvka]

Is this news? I have a feeling that I saw her about 1,5 - 2 weeks ago.
Upd. Wrong. On the SUN news from August 17 ... Military Review, what can you say. And the news about all sorts of WADA and other non-military print quickly ...
Upd number two. Followed the link from SUN to Interfax, and there the news of August 10 ...

[parkello]

was yes, on SUN, I also read. On August 17, Leonid Medvedev posted this news.

[bulvas]

A familiar picture (to the article) ... there was a time ...

[cniza]

This is a gift to our "partners".

[Rozmyssel]

the picture of the supply of information now is such that all sorts of other sites are placed on the link, moreover, everything is run into them sooner, but for some reason later it doesn’t get to the fuel, but now there are so many base rubbish on the fuel that it’s already possible to draw conclusions I don’t like the activity of the forum and they are trying to reduce activity with such measures, info-holders do not need to form a civic position.

[Evgenijus]

I don’t think that the administration specifically does anything to the detriment of the forum participants. There are all sorts of problems for any site (I myself lead a specialized site), therefore one should not criticize the site administration so much. Your comments will be taken into account, but the site will not make gold overnight. And I gave you a plus for protecting the interests of users of this Internet resource.

[Rozmyssel]

Quote: Evgenijus

Your comments will be noted, but you won’t make the site gold overnight.

in general, the site has existed for a long time and it was better before, and many note this.

[sergeyzzz]

I agree with you, I’ve been on the site for about a year and the same I see obvious deterioration.

[Mountain shooter]

The news is "not new", but no less pleasant from this. "Sarmat" is able to reach the foe and through the South Pole, with all its 10 tons of "gifts". With custom delivery right to your doorstep

[Muvka]

No, with all 10 tons across the south it will not get. Across the south only with partial load. Alas. But even with incomplete loading, he is able to bring such gifts that he won’t seem much ...

[Engineer]

Yeah, 7 months ... the Americans on the lunar program didn’t have such lag, and there everything was new, for the first time, on primitive computers, a huge single-chamber engine. And here they can’t tear apart with R-36M2. All this is sad: they cannot go to the sea or to the mine base. Well, then the Makeyevites took up the sea, they’ll make candy, but without a reliable reliable replacement, Satan can’t do it.

[Muvka]

Here, again, the proof that you do not like everything Russian) And Americans are getting better! Sarmat, as I understand it, you also do not like? Like the T-14 and the Mace. I didn’t look further at your comments, but I’m sure that you also don’t like the T-50, Su-35 and further on the list.

[Simple]

Quote: Engineer

And here they can’t tear with P-36М2.

1. SHPU-lag ... 15П718 busy under duty. And they need to be redone
2. And not with the R36M2 they "scuff"
-1 stage "product 99" modification of RD-276 LPRE (Proton-M), not RD-274
-2th step is not RD-0256
-SBRB not RD-869, and LRE development KBHM them.Isaeva
EB and SU and the shell - in general, everything is new

[zombirusrev]

Amer was not on the moon. Their engine, even theoretically, could not reach the declared parameters because it was designed according to wretched technology.
http://free-inform.narod.ru/pepelaz/pepelaz-1.htm
This topic has long been revealed.
http://bigphils.livejournal.com/30084.html
They were not there. Believe further on your overseas masters.

[Samoyed]

Good news. And I would also have made 1000 launch complexes, on which I would randomly place 100 missiles, and on the remaining 900 - simulators. Let them scratch their turnips to attack.

[megavolt823]

This is an application for the 5 generation. for those who do not understand. 2 steps are de facto. de jure 3. each block will have its own engine. maneuver should already 2 step. and (1) these are blocks along the broken path of hyper. will start from 3 blocks to 10. up to megatons each. from 750 to 950 kilotons. This is a real bug bugger from the mattress. if it comes to dense layers? everything, 100%. all 3 and 4. and here is the 5 generation. if they manage, then I will live to 90 years.

[Old26]

Quote: Just

Quote: Engineer

And here they can’t tear with P-36М2.

1. SHPU-lag ... 15П718 busy under duty. And they need to be redone
2. And not with the R36M2 they "scuff"
-1 stage "product 99" modification of RD-276 LPRE (Proton-M), not RD-274
-2th step is not RD-0256
-SBRB not RD-869, and LRE development KBHM them.Isaeva
EB and SU and the shell - in general, everything is new

1. Mine 15P718 in the positional area has nothing to do with it. Throw tests were to be carried out in Plesetsk. And there the mine at the Yubileynaya site is not ready.
2. They are "fiddling" with the R-36M2. Read the Energomash report. Only most likely there will be not 4 engines in the propulsion system of the "Sarmat", but only two

Quote: Samoyed

Good news. And I would also have made 1000 launch complexes, on which I would randomly place 100 missiles, and on the remaining 900 - simulators. Let them scratch their turnips to attack.

I'd love to read the statements of people who at least thought about what they were writing. I don’t even remember about knowing contracts.
Respected!!! For a change, read the texts of the strategic arms treaties. And preferably not on Wikipedia. And not only contracts, but also related documents. You will learn a lot of interesting things then. For example, that the creation of "false" mines is prohibited by the contract. And at the same time ask yourself, even without reading the text of the agreements, at least three questions.

1. Will the Americans watch us do 10 mines per rocket and do nothing at the same time?
2. How will we scratch our turnips to find out what kind of mine the Americans have a rocket in. Indeed, they will have 1000 missiles in the same 100mash, as ours, or they will deploy not 100 missiles in them, but 200 or 500, and we will not know.
3. And the third question. As a well-known character in one of the Soviet comedy films said: "What will it turn into?" How much additional billions or trillions will be spent on this dubious event.

Quote: megavolt823

This is an application for the 5th generation. for those who do not understand. 2 steps is de facto. de jure 3. each block will have its own engine

Oh how !!! De facto, de jure.
De facto, dear, you decided to mix everything in one bottle. Everything you just heard. You already decide to place the new combat equipment (BB with its engines in the absence of SR) announced by Solomon for a new missile complex (most likely for 15P167) on a completely different complex, with a completely different breeding scheme.

Quote: megavolt823

2 steps should be maneuvered

Of course, the second stage should maneuver. How otherwise. And better if the first foot or maneuver can mine.
But did you ask yourself the question, where will the warheads of this missile go if they leave the coordinates where their separation from the CP is programmed? Or do you think that an inertial guidance system is such a thing that what you don’t do with a rocket will still bring you to the right point? so sorry, this is not an autopilot. The inertial guidance system, even during normal flight, tends to accumulate an error, which is why, in principle, separate warheads with individual guidance

[

Quote: megavolt823

and (1) these are blocks along the broken path of the hyper. will start from 3 blocks to 10. up to megatons each. 750 to 950 kilotons

I will tell you SCARY MILITARY SECRET !!!!!!
This applies to warheads. ALL DRAWBARS, ALL INTERCONTINENTAL MISSILES - HYPERSONIC. What the Americans have, what we have, what the French Chinese and others have.
And all of them are currently flying along ballistic trajectories, each aimed at its own target. Homing (guided) warheads currently on ICBMs DOES NOT EXIST. We are tested (like the Americans) SAMPLES such blocks. But in fact, these are not combat units that can maneuver in the atmosphere with hypersonic speeds vertically and horizontally. Now this super hyperbunderwaffe about which they only speak has dimensions of about 7 meters in length with the corresponding wingspan. On the rocket 15Y71 fits only one such winged block. And you are going to put on a rocket with the same approximately overall dimensions not only from 3 to TEN goals, so even almost megaton power.

Quote: megavolt823

this is a real bug bugger from a mattress. if it comes to dense layers? everything, 100%

And if you didn’t get it? If she was shot down on take-off?

Quote: megavolt823

all 3 and 4. and here is the 5th generation. if they manage, then I will live to be 90 years old.

How to tell you. Perhaps you will live up to 90 years. Regardless of the generation of ICBMs. Just hope that we have the 5th, while others have only 3-4 generations - not worth it. Such hatred does not prolong life, but shortens it. You understand that stresses do not increase life expectancy, and you, judging by the expression with which the post was written, will have stresses when you find out that the enemy has already replaced his with 5th generation rockets. And this time is not far off. And the preliminary names have already been announced (like ours).

[megavolt823]

list the warheads that do not have an engine have Mach 11 speeds? Yes, without a bb engine, this is 5-6 Mach. In addition to the WU-14 in China, what else have an engine? p36 1975 of the year 10 warheads with a capacity of 750 CT each and a member knows how many false targets there are, well, somewhere 500 small containers with a video cassette. I checked 3 of different source and wiki too. maybe you have another info.? maybe you are a duck how many tons does the P36 output? and how much does the Sarmatians have? What did the TV look like at home in 1975? how much did it cost? I in 2005 in the car bought less video tape for 3000 p. it's me about evolution, about development. India and Pakistan have 3 generation. France has 2 submarines with ICBMs. no mine. where is not accuracy? . Americans take our engines for cords. or again not true. but about the 2 maneuvering step, look there, all the maneuvers.

[megavolt823]

but about a rocket that spins in a spiral leaving the mine heard? so that the sniper does not shoot down.

[Old26]

Quote: megavolt823

list the warheads that do not have an engine speed of 11 mach Yes, without a BB engine, this is Mach 5-6.

Clear. USE READY-MOUNTED WITH ENGINES !!!! A masterpiece. And which ones? turboprop? Or turbojet?
Damn, the speed of entry of BB intercontinental missiles into the atmosphere is about 7-7,5 km / s, that is, about 23M. Even with braking conditions, the BB near the ground has speeds exceeding those same 5M at least one and a half to two times

Quote: megavolt823

In addition to the WU-14 in the PRC, what else have an engine?

The one that is being developed under project 4202

Quote: megavolt823

p36 1975 10 warheads with a capacity of 750 Kt each and a member knows how many false targets, well, somewhere around 500 small containers with a video cassette. I checked 3 different sources and the wiki too. maybe you have another info.?

Of course, others. On the P-36, the maximum number of warheads is 3. Power 2,3 Mt. PCB weight - 401 kg .. Number of deployed missiles - 10

Quote: megavolt823

how many tons of p36 does it take? and how much is the calculation of the Sarmatians ?.

Approximately equal throw weight. About 5440 kg for the P-36 and about the same for the "Sarmat"

Quote: megavolt823

What did TV look like at home in 1975? how much did it cost I in 2005 bought less video cassettes in a car for 3000 r. I'm talking about evolution, about development

Bad example

Quote: megavolt823

India and Pakistan have 3rd generation. France has 2 submarines with ICBMs. no mine. where is not accuracy? . Americans take our engines for cords. or again not true. and about the 2nd stage of maneuvering, look there all the maneuvers.

Where is the inaccuracy? At least in the number of French submarines. Their 4. Mine ICBMs they never DID NOT HAVE.
Americans take our engines for space carriers, and not for ICBMs. As for maneuvering, you shouldn’t give the murder to be the last resort. The only thing that corresponds to reality is the words of the commander in chief about the weight of the installations. Murzilka with the theme of RS-26 and on the cover of RS-20V ... Strongly

Quote: megavolt823

but about a rocket that spins in a spiral leaving the mine heard? so that the sniper does not shoot down.

And doesn’t somersault over her head? But then, too, a sniper will bring down.
Damn, connoisseur !!!! Do you even imagine what a positional area of ​​a mine PU division is? Spirals !!!!!! Did someone cut in the mine, like in a barrel? Missiles (all currently in service) are thrown from the silos or TPK by the PAD. What and who will spin the rocket there .......

[megavolt823]

Clear. USE READY-HEAT WITH ENGINES !!!! A masterpiece. And which ones? turboprop? Or turbojet? where is the engine

[megavolt823]

Of course, others. On the P-36, the maximum number of warheads is 3. Power 2,3 Mt. PCB weight - 401 kg .. Number of deployed missiles - 10
read the nameplate for the refugee from Baikonur. and do not carry heresy.

[megavolt823]

a little more about the number of bb

[megavolt823]

is provided by a reconnaissance unit, which, using its propulsion system and navigation system, enters the flight path to the first target, separates the combat unit and switches to the flight path to the second target, etc. The time of each maneuver is 30 - 50 seconds, and the total time breeding 10 war blocks - 5 - 8 minutes. The unit is separated by gas cartridges or spring pushers, with them the block is simultaneously twisted around its axis. Combat units are mounted on a breeding unit in one or two tiers, like cartridges in a revolving drum. Before starting BB breeding, the breeding unit assumes a position in which the axis of rotation is directed normal to the Earth, with its nose down, and thus orienting warheads accordingly, which ensures maximum flight efficiency in the atmosphere. The number of BBs on ICBMs is 10 or more. War blocks fly to targets along ballistic trajectories and are not controlled. The accuracy of hitting the target depends on the exact exit of the reconnaissance unit on the trajectory and the pulseless separation of the BB, flight range, ballistic characteristics of the unit, the influence of the gyroscopic effect, to reduce which the warhead can give itself additional rotation upon entering the atmosphere. The accuracy of the hit is determined by the parameter CVO - the radius of the circle into which the warhead will fall in 50% of cases. What am I talking about? and to whom? where is it about turboprops? Or turbojet?

[megavolt823]

Yes! on some bb engine were placed. but their function? and in the heads of 1 to 3 bb. breeding and adjustment and targeting. and 5 generation blocks on their own 50% of the way they do. and maneuver not due to braking.

[Old26]

Quote: megavolt823

Clear. USE READY-HEAT WITH ENGINES !!!! A masterpiece. And which ones? turboprop? Or turbojet? where is the engine

But he is not. You also do not understand sarcasm. This phrase is the answer to your statement that

list the warheads that do not have an engine speed of 11 mach Yes, without a BB engine, this is Mach 5-6.

Although when you make such a statement, it’s not out of place to know at least the BB speed, especially ICBMs, and not write nonsense

Quote: megavolt823

Of course, others. On the P-36, the maximum number of warheads is 3. Power 2,3 Mt. PCB weight - 401 kg .. Number of deployed missiles - 10
read the nameplate for the refugee from Baikonur. and do not carry heresy.

For starters, don't put up labels just by signing up. I have never been a refugee, but your avatar, which reads "Veteran of the Kashchenko Hospital", is very significant.
And before you write - teach MATCH. It would not be superfluous for you. You give an example of one rocket

Quote: megavolt823

p36 1975 10 warheads with a capacity of 750 Kt each and a member knows how many false targets, well, somewhere around 500 small containers with a video cassette. I checked 3 different sources and the wiki too.

And then, as proof of "your innocence", bring the "nameplate" of a completely different rocket. is this your evidence?
Still, it would be worth knowing that the rocket P-36 has an index 8K67 and western designation SS-9 "Scarp". And the R-36M2 rocket, the nameplate of which you are given refers to the rocket family R-36M - R-36M UTTH - R-36M2. Western designation SS-18 "Satan". Contractual designation PC-20

So.
P-36 has an index 8K67 and western designation SS-9 "Scarp". The number of BBs on modifications 1-3 = one, on the modification 4-3 BBs as part of a cassette-type RGH (scattering type)

R-36M2The nameplate of which you are referring to belongs to the rocket family R-36M - R-36M UTTH - R-36M2.
= R-36M rocket (15A14) has three options for military equipment. Two variants with monoblocks and one with an RFG carrier EIGHT war blocks. Moreover, on the outer surface

= R-36M UTTH missile (15A18) has an hfg carrier TEN war blocks. Like option 15A18-1

= R-36M2 missile (15A18M) It has two options for military equipment. One with a candy bar and one with an RFG carrier TEN war blocks.

There you go. And to invent that on the R-36 was carrying 10 BB ... Deliver us from such your sacred knowledge, gleaned from nowhere ...