PR ancient shell

14
Do not be surprised. PR was always, even when people did not know about its existence. For example, the Egyptian Pharaoh was a god for the Egyptians, but ... he was dressed in exactly the same cut skirt as the last peasant, which demonstrated his "proximity to the people." A modern politician puts a black tie on a funeral, but the debate is usually red - the color of domination, and that is why American image makers do not advise girls to wear red underwear on their first intimate date. Subconsciously, this may have an effect on the young man not in the best way, right up to embarrassment. But the midshipmen of the Marine Corps in St. Petersburg at the beginning of the twentieth century, on the contrary, were given official slacks ... of red color, and they were used exclusively for trips to cereal places! Well, in the past, the purpose of "showing oneself" and domination over all others was served by luxurious clothes, and even such a utilitarian thing as a battle shell protecting the chest and back. So a different shell was more important in terms of informational impact on the public, rather than as a means of individual protection. Well, as an example, let's take a close look at the famous statue of Caesar Octavius ​​Augustus found in Prima Port, which can be seen in almost any textbook on stories Ancient world. And - even though it seems surprising, there are no less secrets in it than in a different cipher, only that which seems incomprehensible to us today, at that time everyone understood right away!

PR ancient shell

Commander of the Republican Rome in a muscular metal cuirass. To the left of it are the scribes, to the right - the honorary guardian lictors. Fig. A. McBride



First, however, it should be remembered that the Celts and the Etruscans already used metal (bronze and copper shells) muscular cuirass, the main decoration of which was more or less relief muscles of their owners, as well as spirals and circles from relief cones. The Greeks refused these “excesses”, and their cuirass showed only the beauty of metal torsos. True, linen shells - lithoraxes of quilted linen fabric could be decorated with overlaid chased images of lion's faces and the Gorgon Medusa, but they did not enjoy their pomp, like the Romans did in the republican era.


Etruria. "Warrior's Tomb in Vulci" and the armor found in it and weapon. National Museum "Baths of Diocletian", Rome.


Breastplate from Warrior's Tomb in Vulci.

That is, if rank-and-file warriors wore metal plates on belts or chain mail on their chests, then the commander could afford what was most possible, it was a muscular cuirass with stressed muscles, which his servant polished every time to a mirror shine, which again emphasized his high status .

But now the Republic was replaced by the Empire (even if it was still in the form of a principality) and it was here that everything changed, and in a very noticeable way.


Greek anatomical armor: cuirass - thorax and leggings - cnemidy. British museum

It all started with the fact that 20 April 1863, in Prima Port, was found a statue of Octavius ​​Augustus, which is now in the Vatican. Art critics believe that this statue is the most perfect image of Augustus, which is shown dressed in a rich chased carapace, which shows several figures at once. At first it seems they were made on it solely for the sake of beauty. However, it turns out that this is just a non-verbal code, that is, a non-verbal code, or, in other words, a purely intuitive PR that helped with the help of visual information to influence the Roman public!


King Menelaus Greek vase from the Metropolitan Museum in New York. He is wearing a linen shell with metal scales fixed on it.

First of all, it must be emphasized that Octavian Augustus never called himself neither the emperor nor the king, but demanded that the people around him call him a princeps - “first among equals”, that is, demonstrate his affection for the traditions of the Roman republic. And he really gained a great many different first posts, declaring himself the first senator, the first tribune, the commander in chief, and even ... the supreme (that is, the first!) Priest. Thus, he concentrated in the hands of the power of a true supreme ruler, almost more than many kings at that time possessed! At the same time, the Roman people, brought up in the traditions of democracy, did not at all consider themselves to be deceived by this and did not make any claims to the usurper! How to explain it?


The statue of the Roman emperor or commander in a chased cuirass, trimmed elaborately and whimsically, but tasteless. It depicts the goddess Selena and two Nereids. Approximate dating 100 - 130 AD Exhibited at the National Archaeological Museum in Athens.

And so that Augustus was able to show all his actions in such a way that the Romans quite sincerely thought that he was acting in the common interest and, in addition, reverently honors the ancient patriarchal traditions of republican Rome. Here he cut the army - saved people's money! Introduced a tax on luxury - another laudable savings on ... gladiator fights. Began to severely punish thievish officials? Well, this is absolutely wonderful: “Everything does for the people”!


Painted sculpture of Octavian Augustus. That is how in ancient times both Greek and Roman sculptures should have looked.

All is well! One thing is bad: neither Octavian's face, nor his posture, nor his musculature looked like an ancient hero. He was not tall, even if he was a little bit, but he was limping, and he was often cold, so he sometimes wore several tunics at a time.

However, who do we see on the statue depicting it? The beautiful demigod is who we see on her. And although the statue, naturally, could not speak, it was the “shell” put on her that “spoke” for her, being an excellent means of non-verbal PR communication!


Graphic representation of details on the shell of Octavian Augustus.

Well, so what people of that time, looking at him, learned? On the upper part of the shell there was a picture of the god Helios, since it was believed that this god knows everything about everyone, because from above you can see everything from above. In addition, it is the god of the Sun, therefore, the purity of the thoughts of the princeps, therefore, no one should have been in doubt. Below, two goddesses, Aurora and Selene, were depicted at once, which symbolized the prosperity of Rome, which supposedly came under Augustus. God Mars, accompanied by a wolf (two figures in the very center of the shell), receiving from the Parthenian Roman eagle, well, it is clear to everyone - a symbol of victory over Parthia - although it was not military, but only diplomatic! But it was! On both sides on the armor were the allegorical images of Germany and Spain, conquered by the power of the Roman weapon, and the god Apollo, riding on a griffin, hinted at all at all ... the divinity of the Princeps family! Like, this is none other than the god Apollo himself connected with his mother while she slept, but in the end - such a wonderful ruler! Accordingly, the goddess Diana with a deer on the left side of the shell showed the connection of Octavian with the Roman demos, since she was considered her patroness. Octavian tried to never neglect the voices of the demos, arranged gladiatorial battles and bread distributions for him, so it was immediately apparent to all that the goddess princeps was patronizing. God Tellus with his cornucopia is again a hint at the well-being that Octavian brought to the Roman people.

It’s funny that Augustus is bos on the statue, although, as an emperor, he usually always and everywhere wore shoes. In this case, it is a Greek tradition - to depict a hero without shoes. And here is hidden another hint, a hint that Octavian is none other than the second Alexander of Macedon. In addition, two more characters are depicted on the shell - a dolphin and Cupid, also for a reason. And he and the other - the satellites of the goddess Venus. Venus was considered the patroness of the house of Julius, and her companion dolphin reminded that the goddess was born from sea foam. There is an assumption that Augustus initially held a spear in his left hand - another heroic symbol, but in the Renaissance the spear was replaced by an imperial scepter, and thus the imperial "greatness" of Octavian Augustus was finally approved.


Sculpture in marble.

Well, of course, considering all these details, people of our time can say little. But for the contemporaries of Octavian, his statue was an "open book." So it was enough for the Roman only to look at her briefly to make sure once again: yes, indeed, Octavian Augustus is in fact divine, everything that he does for society is only for the benefit and good for everyone and for everyone! So, even in those years far from us, people paid so much attention to non-verbal communications, and, of course, everything is the same place to be now!
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    16 September 2016 07: 04
    Thanks, interesting article ...
  2. +4
    16 September 2016 08: 06
    The article only proves that our essence has not changed for millennia, even cattle requiring bread and circuses. Only holiday cuirasses of modern leaders replaced armored limousines. As symbols of power, as well as popular calendars for especially exalted admirers of their idols, depicting their idols in the image of legendary warriors , tricked out by special forces, and green men waging a holy struggle against world evil.
    1. +2
      16 September 2016 08: 29
      There are people who know, there are people who think they know. However, in their hearts they believe that they are among the first.
    2. 0
      16 September 2016 09: 46
      What category of population do you consider yourself to be?
      1. +1
        16 September 2016 11: 07
        What category of population do you consider yourself to be?
        -------------------------------------------------
        I know that I know. That I know nothing.: =)
      2. +1
        16 September 2016 11: 39
        When a person is not the same as in general, therefore one is like that, and the other is like that, and his mind is not for dancing, but for the device of himself, for the decoupling of his existence, for information of circumvention, and when such a person, if he is incarnated, will rise with his mind behind the clouds, and there it becomes one’s mind ... it becomes even higher than the Lavra bell tower and when he looks down at the studio, he will seem to him ... they seem so tiny-tiny ... just like mice. Sorry. Like kris. Because it’s the same person! And the one that he ... is ... he ... he is also a man, not punched, but ... Why? Well this is very, very! Yes! Yes! But no! wassat
        1. PCF
          +2
          16 September 2016 14: 34
          Muzchina, you have to write long texts, like the continuation of "Chevengur"!
          Burn !!!
    3. +5
      16 September 2016 09: 54
      Of course! In Penza, on Lenin Square, we have a monument to Lenin Vutetich: oblique fathom in the shoulders, a small head and pood fists. Translated to normal height, there will be a man with square shoulders six feet tall. But everyone knows that Ilyich was below average growth, with sloping shoulders and wide hips. And there are monuments, for example, in Anapa, where he is. But ... does not look. And here - the LEADER with a capital letter. That is, all the tricks from August to Vutetich have not changed.
    4. +1
      16 September 2016 16: 35
      button

      In any case, the person's desire does not change: "to survive and multiply." It is common for everyone to survive. But increase can be interpreted in different ways. Multiply at the expense of others or multiply with others. In the first case, it speaks of the principle: "the strongest survives." In the second case, it speaks of the principle of "survival together." The latter is the growth of society. This is the principle that made man out of a monkey. The principle of social equality.

      So rulers have always relied on the principle of social equality, but not always they could resist the temptation to take advantage of their opportunities. And history says that all the same, the rulers fought for stability by all available means. The same Ivan the Terrible. The same I. Stalin.
      1. 0
        16 September 2016 20: 31
        Quote: gladcu2
        fought

        What is more important, the process or the result? Remember how Gaidar said - "they fought, fought, but they themselves crashed!"
  3. +5
    16 September 2016 10: 10
    An excellent article that once again emphasizes the inextricability of human civilization.
    Mentality.
    Which, in fact, completely excludes all sorts of "Dark Ages", the decline of culture, etc. etc.
    If we already began to make armors incomparable in quality and artistic decoration, then this skill would remain.
    Unchanging.
    Surely something, but a man never used to munch on, did not greed. For decoration and fashion - for women.
    ...
    Indeed, well, not a single general in his uniform will look like a private, otherwise what kind of general is he? True, whatever the general was, he yields to the "correct demobilization", hung like a New Year tree.
    Maybe only some nito Latin American or African general will surpass.
    So, everything is correct.
    We who served read colleagues without stress. Habit.
    And for outsiders - another reason to admire - regalia and dashing parade.
    ...
    Good article.
    1. +2
      16 September 2016 11: 12
      Well, there were declines, technologies were lost, civilizations perished along with their culture ...
  4. +1
    16 September 2016 10: 36
    A certain absent-minded politician will probably be endowed with an "iPhone" in the future statue. For pootsan quite a status thing.
  5. 0
    16 September 2016 10: 55
    Imagine Putin in ... a bulletproof vest over a jacket, also a "message" ... laughing , also "PR".

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"