The official version is this: two “boeing” companies of American Airlines were captured by Arab terrorists and aimed at the twin buildings of the shopping center of New York. Skyscrapers collapsed. Under the rubble, more than three thousand people died. The Pentagon building in Washington was the victim of the third killer aircraft. The fourth Boeing, whose passengers allegedly tried to neutralize the terrorists, lost control and collapsed near Shanksville, Pa., Before reaching the target — the White House or the US Congress building.
The US administration said the organizers of the crime were Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida. Islamic terrorism is called the main threat to US national security. The date of September 11 was declared a turning point in American politics and military strategy. On the wave of indignation, retribution soon followed - an attack on Afghanistan, where the nest of terrorists led by Bin Laden was allegedly located.
However, when it was time to analyze the circumstances related to the tragedy, the official version caused many doubts. They are reflected in the press, in dozens of books in the United States, Germany, France, Austria and other countries.
In the Berlin University. Humboldt still 30 June 2003, the discussion was “Staged terrorism. September plot 11. Considerations were shared by political and public figures, journalists of Germany - for example, former minister Andreas von Bülow (an expert in the secret services, supervised the work of German intelligence in the Bundestag from 1989 to 1994), correspondents of West German Radio (WDR) Gerhard Wisniewski and Ekkehard Ziker , correspondents of Frankfurter Rundschau Eckard Spo, Tagestsaytung Mathias Breukers, and others. The discussion caused a resonance in Germany and other countries. Its course was covered in the press body of the Bundestag "Das Parliament". As a result, the official version of the Bush administration was identified as a hoax. It was noted that the tragedy served as an excuse for US global expansion under the pretext of combating "international terrorism".
During the discussion, it was recalled that in 1962, the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States developed a special operation "Northwoods". The scenario is this: the CIA secretly fakes a terrorist act allegedly directed against the United States.
The blame lies with the Cuban leadership led by F. Castro. According to the plan, a passenger plane with American tourists, but in fact with the CIA agents on board, makes a landing shortly after takeoff. Instead, it rises an empty plane, controlled from the ground, and heads for Jamaica, Panama or Venezuela. Flying over the Cuban waters, he sends a radio message that he was attacked by MiG fighters. Following this, a bomb on board is activated by a radio signal from the United States. The plane falls into the sea. A noisy campaign is unfolding about the "unprovoked attack" of Cuban fighters on a US civilian aircraft. Clearly, in the USA - an explosion of indignation. And then the US military attacked Cuba. Beautiful and convincing!
But the Pentagon’s plan did not come true - President John F. Kennedy imposed a ban. During the discussion, Gerhard Wisniewski expressed the opinion that under President Bush Jr., according to the same scenario, it was not difficult for US secret services to fake the September 11 attacks. Wisnevsky's film "The Question of 11 September remains open" in July 2003, the year passed on the VDR and Phoenix channels. The author, who visited Shanksville shortly after the terrorist attacks in search of the wreckage of a fallen plane, asserts: there was no fourth aircraft. The funnel, supposedly left by him after the fall, was similar to the result of an explosion on earth. Wisniewski did not find traces of the crashed aircraft. He published a photo of a funnel with the inscription: “Would you believe that the whole Boeing 757 disappeared in this hole?” Only six years later (!), In April 2006 of the year, at the official level in the USA they reported that a black box was allegedly found at the scene of the crash of the plane in Shanksville, with a record of the pilots' talks. But the list of passengers "for ethical reasons" was not published. This in itself could not help but surprise ...
The general opinion was: September 11 attacks were staged by the US secret services. Journalist Michael Opperskalski expressed his conviction: there is no “al-Qaeda’s terrorist network”, and “the threat of Islamic terrorism” is nothing but an enemy image, “designed by Western secret services”.
Curious views of intelligence experts. Horst Emke, who, under Willy Brandt, coordinated the work of the secret services of the Federal Republic of Germany, believed that the terrorists could not hijack four aircraft at once without the knowledge of the CIA. His colleague Andreas von Bülow believed that the Israeli intelligence service Mossad was also involved in the attacks. For her, as for the White House, it was important to set public opinion in favor of the war against the Arabs. In the book "The CIA and 11 September. International Terror and the Role of the Secret Services ”Bulow notes:“ Terrorist operations to influence public opinion are commonplace for the CIA. The list of CIA-inspired murders is long. ”
The authors of the publications posed a lot of questions to the Bush administration on the events of September 11. Many still without an answer. For example:
• Why did the US Congress not immediately set up a commission to investigate the circumstances and did not hold a hearing on the emergency event? The decision to create it was taken only two years later, when all the evidence that could shed light on the secret disappeared. Henry Kissinger was offered to head the commission. He refused. Why?
• Why didn’t the Arabic family name appear on the passenger lists of the planes published by CNN and hit the Internet on the same day, September 11? And on the third day after the terrorist attack, the FBI unveiled a list of 19 Arab terrorists participating in the operation. 10 of them, as it turned out, were alive.
• Why were journalists banned from independently investigating the case and allowed to remove the ruins of skyscrapers only from one specified place?
• Why only the FBI, a privately owned firm, Controlled Demolition Inc., has the exclusive right to gather facts and evidence. ("Corporation of Managed Destruction"), as well as Fire Engineering?
• Why was the “Managed Destruction Corporation”, which possessed special materials and equipment (including laser, for vertical demolition of high-rise buildings, so as not to endanger neighboring buildings), was the first in the place of a criminal action and received a large sum of remuneration?
• Why did both 110-storey buildings, fastened from the inside with a sturdy steel frame, collapsed vertically on their foundations, as if their “controlled destruction” had been carried out, although the architects and engineers who had erected them guaranteed that both skyscrapers were designed to withstand the blows of even large airplanes?
• How could the frame be destroyed to its full length if the melting point of steel was about 1300 degrees Celsius and the burn-out temperature of aviation fuel was 800 degrees? Vertical sliding down towers would be possible if cylinders with a substance that quickly destroys the metal, or as a result of directional explosions, were installed along their frameworks. In addition, the fuel of the aircraft that crashed into the center of the first tower poured almost entirely inside, and the fuel of the second aircraft that landed in the corner of the second high-rise poured out.
• How to explain that the total destruction of the steel frameworks of both towers occurred? There are no skeletons left of them. According to experts, this could not be the result of directed air strikes.
• Why did the third high-rise building standing nearby collapse, although no one crashed into it?
• Why, as representatives of the New York police said, were all the remnants of the collapsed metal urgently sent to the smelter? At the request of the New York Times, who gave the order, the Office of the Governor of New York did not respond.
• Why did the destruction of the towers begin according to a single scheme from the very top, and not from the floors damaged by airplanes? Why did they collapse so quickly, just an hour after the upper floors of one of the skyscrapers caught fire?
• Why did the authorities refuse to comment on the testimony of witnesses and firefighters, that they had heard numerous explosions inside the towers before they began to fall? Was the use of airplanes a diversionary maneuver?
• Does it also seem strange that neither Bin Laden, nor any of the other Arab terrorists claimed responsibility for the attack? Two weeks after it, a video was shown on American TV in which Bin Laden allegedly expressed satisfaction with what had happened. But, according to experts, the record is like a montage.
• It is noteworthy that the American company Silverstein and the Israeli company Catch six weeks before the tragic events insured both buildings of the shopping center with more than 3 billion dollars. This amount is higher than the one that went to their construction. The total amount of insurance payments amounted to a record amount of 70 billion dollars.
Summarizing, the American author Eric Hoefschmid wrote in his book: “What happened on September 11 is not the final act, but a prologue to further incredible events and lies that will not be so easy to unravel.”
The US authorities refrained from commenting on the arguments of the skeptics. George Bush briefly stated: “We must tell the truth about terror. We will never tolerate arrogant conspiracy theories and malicious lies in connection with the September 11 attacks. They aim to divert attention from the terrorists. ” But the report of the Congressional Commission on the investigation of the circumstances and the perpetrators of the attack did not give an answer to the specific questions posed by political, scientific and public circles.
In October, 2007 was published a letter to 160 by US scientists and specialists, where they rejected the official interpretation of the September 11 attacks and accused the United States secret services of conducting them. In 2009, the chairman of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Policy Committee of the Japanese Parliament, Yukihisa Fuyita, published the book “The 11 of September is questionable - a discussion in the Japanese parliament. Can Obama change the USA? ” His co-authors were American professor David Griffin and a number of Japanese politicians. In 2008 and 2009, at a hearing in the Japanese parliament, they questioned the official status of the events. In April, 2008, Fuyita, along with Juliet Chiesa, former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellier, Canadian parliament member Libby Davis, American politicians Mike Gravel, Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinley, Arizona Senator Karen Johnson demanded that the US authorities conduct a new investigation Then nothing was done ...
When you think about the circumstances of the September 11 terrorist attack, historical association with the practice of organizing provocations and covert operations by the American ruling elite and its special services to justify wars against a particular state or to overthrow objectionable governments.
We can recall the staged sinking of the American frigate “Main” in 1898 to create an excuse for the US war against Spain, or the same dramatization of the drowning of the “Lusitania” in 1915 to justify the entry of the US into the First World War.
In the same series is the Pearl Harbor tragedy in 1941, the mystery of which has held onto seven seals for decades. And the mystery of the murder of John F. Kennedy? She is not solved. The organizers of the murder are unknown, several dozen witnesses, one after another sent to the next world.
There are many examples. And after 11 September, secret provocations and sophisticated deception by the US leadership and intelligence services did not stop. To start a war against Iraq, Bush misled fellow citizens, the UN and the rest of the world, by declaring that Saddam Hussein was involved in the September 11 attack, has weapons mass destruction, dangerous and must be eliminated by force. And it was all a lie too.
PS This article was prepared for publication a few days before the death of Vyacheslav Ivanovich Dashichev 1 on June 2016. She was the last in his life (1925 – 2016). The author did not live to see the day when the report of the US Congress on the terrorist attacks of 11 of September of 2001 of the year prepared in 2002 of the year was published in July. And in this report, by the way, neither final conclusions nor the whole truth about the tragedy are contained.