Another top 5 of Russian weapons from National Interest

53
An expert of The National Interest magazine Kyle Mizokami has compiled a rating list of military equipment that will be in service with the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation for 2030 g, reports RIA News.





The first on the list is the T-14 main tank based on the Armata universal platform, the creation of which “became a great technological leap for the armed forces: the tank has multilayer combined armor of a modular design, uninhabited turret, active and passive defense complexes, in addition, the T- 14 is supposed to be "stealtha tank“with paint that makes the car invisible to radar,” Mizokami writes.

According to him, the cost of one tank is about $ 3,7 million. “And Moscow has already signed a contract for the first hundred vehicles. This is enough to equip three battalions for each 31 tank or one tank regiment, "- said the expert.

In the second position, he put a promising armored vehicle T-15, created also on the basis of "Almaty".

“The 1500 engine horsepower is located in the front compartment of the car, which increases the security of the habitable part. Like the T-14, the BMP T-15 has active and passive defense complexes, the combat module of the machine uses the 30-mm automatic gun 2-42 and two dual launchers for the Kornet ATGM system, the article says.

According to the observer, “The Russian Ground Forces are far from the times when unprotected infantry played the role of cannon fodder: today, thanks to the new T-15 combat vehicle, the Russian infantry is one of the most protected units on the battlefield.”

Next - attack helicopter Ka-52.

“The basic equipment of the Ka-52 is the same as on the T-15, the 30-mm 2-42 gun. Launchers are located on each side of the wing, in which can be placed six missiles of the Sturm, Ataka or Igla complexes. Two gas turbine engines VK-2500 provide the ability to fly at heights above 5km, ”writes Mizokami.

In fourth place - OSTK 9K720 "Iskander-M".

The expert notes that “the new product of an extensive line of tactical missiles, the development of which began in the years of the Cold War, Iskander-M is distinguished by unprecedented accuracy, range and power.”

“The range of destruction of the Iskander target is 599 kilometers, and thanks to the GLONASS and GPS systems, the missile’s accuracy is between five and seven meters from the target in half of the cases. This makes the Iskander a powerful tactical weapons against goals of high importance, ”he writes.

Closes the top-5 Kalashnikov sniper rifle (SVK).

According to Mizokami, the SVK will replace the Dragunov rifle, which is in service with 1963. piston with a short stroke ", - said in the article.
  • RIA News. Vladimir Astapkovich
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    11 September 2016 10: 29
    And it's all? and where are the goodies that are only in development, by 2030 there will be many that will appear, why run ahead of the engine.
    1. +12
      11 September 2016 10: 36
      You cannot use all the "goodies" in one go. - You may not feel all the charm and "aftertaste" of each of them. Yes
      1. +14
        11 September 2016 11: 03
        Quote: SRC P-15
        You cannot use all the "goodies" in one go. - You may not feel all the charm and "aftertaste" of each of them. Yes


        Do not forget that it is written for Americans,
        they already understand that Russia is "the No. 1 threat to the United States and its allies," and then there's also a new sniper rifle ...
        1. +4
          11 September 2016 11: 41
          It's better to scare a rifle than a T-50 or Tu-160M2. bully
          1. +8
            11 September 2016 11: 44
            And it's all? and where are the goodies that are only in development, by 2030 there will be many that will appear, why run ahead of the engine.


            They should not know more.
          2. +1
            11 September 2016 12: 51
            Quote: Alex777
            It's better to scare a rifle than a T-50 or Tu-160M2.

            The main thing for them is a feeling of fright. They are ready to be afraid of their shadow, if only to get the loot in the military budget.
          3. 0
            12 September 2016 10: 56
            and the author kept silent about the "Caliber", IMHA he tried to cover different directions and missed electronic warfare and, for example, the S-400 and by 2030 the S-500 for that matter.
    2. +6
      11 September 2016 12: 19

      Americans and Ukrainians - do not watch - the bomb will be hard! )
    3. +1
      11 September 2016 13: 24
      Goodies are limited by the format of the article: only 5 pcs.
    4. +4
      11 September 2016 13: 47
      Why 2030? There are also earlier "snacks", in the form of Tu-160M2, Su-30, 35, T-50, Kurganets, Dragun and a whole series of various surface and submarine ships, not to mention air defense and electronic warfare-RER
  2. +3
    11 September 2016 10: 32
    We are the best and we have to put up with it
    1. +3
      11 September 2016 12: 19
      Of course we are the best. drinks
      Kyle Mizokami of The National Interest knows this, and is so nervous about this that he even attributed the extra 100 km to Iskander-M, calling the missile not an operational-tactical one, but a short-range one.
      But Vladimir Astapkovich from RIA Novosti could have noticed this inaccuracy. The original (The National Interest) shows a range of 372 land miles = 599 km.
      In fact, under the agreement no more than 499 km.
      In general, I was already used to challenging Majumdar, and then Mizokami appeared. Probably a popular topic among "them there" is the rearmament of our army.
      1. +5
        11 September 2016 12: 43
        Tibidokh hi Quote:
        that he even attributed an extra 100 km to Iskander-M, calling the missile not an operational-tactical one, but a short-range one.
        I personally feel modest winked "Caliber" also hit 300 km not long ago laughing Anyway, after the missile defense, what the hell and what are the agreements about?
        1. +2
          11 September 2016 13: 17
          Quote: Observer2014
          "Caliber" also hit 300 km not long ago

          3M-54E - 220 km.
          3M-54E1 - 300 km.
          3M-14E - 300 km.
          As you can see, the range is 300 km. - This is an export option, the characteristics of which are limited by the MTCR (300 km. at 500 kg. warhead), and not by the INF Treaty. For the Navy, what are the restrictions on the INF Treaty? The Navy doesn't care about that. Therefore, the return of the Crimea and the modernization of the Caspian flotilla are so "burned" by the Americans and henchmen.
          Nobody has ever made any statements about the "domestic" range.
          Although not ... I'm lying ... Several times they made the same statements:
          October 7, 2015 - a grouping of ships of the Caspian flotilla.
          November 20, 2015 - a grouping of ships of the Caspian flotilla.
          December 8, 2015 - the submarine Rostov-on-Don.
          August 19, 2016 - ships of the Black Sea Fleet.

          No, of course, data about 3M-54 at 660 km flashed. and 3M-14T at 2600 km., however, I personally did not find official data. request
          Quote: Observer2014
          after missile defense what the hell and what about the contracts?

          drinks
          We will add drones here, which can also be brought into violation by the Americans of the INF Treaty.
      2. +1
        11 September 2016 21: 25
        You will pay attention to the last name. Two Ukrainians ... a joke.
        Hindu and Japanese!
        Indigenous Anglo-Saxes are silent in the radish.
        1. 0
          12 September 2016 05: 00
          Quote: akims
          You will pay attention to the last name. Two Ukrainians ...

          Are you talking about "Vladimir Astapkovich and Dave Majumdar"?
          Or "Vladimir Astapkovich and Kyle Mizokami"?
          Or "Dave Majumdar and Kyle Mizokami"?
          As for me, all three are ...
          PySy: To be honest, so am I. wassat
  3. +4
    11 September 2016 10: 35
    An interesting five. The National Interest has already leaked the aircraft of the probable enemy, leaving the battlefield behind the land. It is understandable. The videoconferencing system does not sleep, and the engineers are very insidious and skilled in their intrigues the search for effective destruction of enemy aircraft
  4. +7
    11 September 2016 10: 43
    This is already what "five" in a row? They already have a lot of these "fives", there are "Caliber", and the Su-34, and "Sarmat", and submarines.
    1. +1
      11 September 2016 11: 12
      Quote: Altona
      This is already what "five" in a row? They already have a lot of these "fives", there are "Caliber", and the Su-34, and "Sarmat", and submarines.

      How many journalists, so many fives. Our Korotchenko has this: Sarmat, Barguzin, T-50, S-500, S-400 hi
  5. 0
    11 September 2016 10: 50
    Some garbage. What kind of rating? Everything that is on the base of Almaty has not yet been fully tested. There you can cram and sniper Kalashnikov. What is the result? Iskander and Alligator. The journalists have done a nice job.
    1. +3
      11 September 2016 11: 11
      How, did you not pay attention? Gentlemen, we have a new "expert" Kyle Mizokami, from the National Interest! Where tell us, the long-suffering Dave Majumdadar, so "beloved" by us (I hope he wrote it correctly)? Or is that all, the hiccups covered for life?
      1. 0
        11 September 2016 13: 27
        Quote: Red_Hamer
        Where tell me, so "loved" to us, the long-suffering Dave Majumdadar

        Dave Majumdar was recognized as more or less adequate and was disgraced by the editorial staff from the magazine with shame. laughing Kyle Mizokami follows in his footsteps, risking falling into disfavor as well.
        An ideal five for Americans would look like this:
        - Fist.
        - Bow.
        - A rock.
        - A spear.
        - Club.

        And the Russians, meanwhile, with a brain drain and meager financing, manage to not only create but also to adopt the weapons of the 21st century.
    2. +2
      11 September 2016 11: 24
      As far as I understand, the T-14 has already passed all the tests and is already buying a batch of 100 pieces to find childhood diseases and eliminate them. This is the same as with the Su-34 after Syria. They are going to use the Syrian experience to plow up the Su-34M.
      1. AUL
        0
        12 September 2016 11: 16
        As far as I understand, the T-14 has already passed all the tests and is already buying a batch of 100 pieces to find childhood diseases and eliminate them.

        Not all. This hundred went to military trials - there is such a stage in the life of every weapon.
  6. +1
    11 September 2016 10: 50
    The principles of The National Interest in pulling out precisely these samples are completely incomprehensible.
  7. +1
    11 September 2016 11: 08
    Here it is the ICS, although it would be right to say not a rifle, but a carbine, because its barrel length is 410 mm.

    In the photo, an option under the NATO cartridge 7,62x51
    But there is still a new RPK-16 machine gun

    In the photo, an option with a barrel length of 370 mm. There is a barrel length of 550 mm.
    And here is the new AK-15 chambered for 7,62x39

    AK-12 differs from it only in ammunition. That's just with AK-12/15 a lot of incomprehensible and all the perplexities come from the Ministry of Defense.
    Well, this is a real novelty; there is not even data on the network on it.

    Someone guess the product?
    By the way, all this was exhibited at the Army-2016 forum. The program there was really cool.
    1. +2
      11 September 2016 11: 45
      Someone guess the product?
      His Majesty, the assault rifle Kalashnikov assault rifle, FZMO (FIG knows how much modernized, lightweight) with a collimator sight.
      I guess? laughing
      1. +1
        11 September 2016 12: 07
        No. Attention, the correct answer.
        Self-loading carbine Saiga-12 Alpha! Barrel length - 430 mm. Fuse above trigger. Auto shutter lag, quick reset key store.
        Caliber -12 mm. Cartridges 12x70 and 12x76
        There is only one minus - there are no open sights. Maybe in serial versions will be.
        Price ... I don’t know how much they will request, but obviously they will not make it cheaper.
        1. 0
          11 September 2016 12: 52
          Quote: erased
          Self-loading carbine Saiga-12 Alpha!

          Oh damn it. A hunting weapon is a hunting weapon that disguises as a combat weapon. An assault rifle is an assault rifle. In this case, disguised as a standard AKM, hi
        2. 0
          11 September 2016 17: 39
          Damn, I didn’t see her. laughing Again, a new safe will have to buy
    2. +2
      11 September 2016 14: 28
      About the last: It seemed like some saigas) I also twisted this device in my hands, but for me it’s not very, not familiar.
      I liked the RPK at the booth the most and the saiga under 12 cal that was with a muzzle brake discard if someone saig that fotkal)
      1. 0
        11 September 2016 14: 54
        Was Saiga -12K Spanish. 340. At the booth, she was represented by a girl - an athlete, practical shooting. She is with this carbine and stands.
        According to the PKK. On the stand was an option with a long barrel of 550 mm and a silencer. The bipods are extremely unsuccessful, in the photo in their album the variant with the bipod hilt is much more interesting. But RPK-16 itself is quite on the level, just for battle at a distance of up to 300 meters (in the field up to - 500).
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +1
    11 September 2016 11: 19
    Hindu on vacation or what? Now for him, Kyle Mizokami? Tolerated the Indian, tolerate the Japanese, so what?
  10. +2
    11 September 2016 11: 43
    As recently as yesterday, I was reading National Interest "specialist" Robert Farley. About the fact that the US army is capable of defeating Russia and China at once in case of war. This confidence in victory is based on "historical knowledge", guess what I mean? Yeah, they "won" the Second World War! Their fleet "defeated" the Japanese in the Pacific, while their land army contributed "a major role in Europe." This is how, and now, both the Chinese and us will be defeated, at once!
  11. +2
    11 September 2016 11: 44
    Quote: Tusv
    An interesting five. The National Interest has already leaked the aircraft of the probable enemy, leaving the battlefield behind the land. It is understandable. The videoconferencing system does not sleep, and the engineers are very insidious and skilled in their intrigues the search for effective destruction of enemy aircraft

    Do not pay attention to the ratings from this publication. On what principles they are made is unknown even to the authors themselves. So it is here. It is unclear why the top 5 of these samples, three of which are not yet in the army.
    1. 0
      11 September 2016 11: 57
      Quote: Old26
      It is not clear why the top 5 of these samples, three of which are not yet in the army.

      Armat microarmad was reported to the army a month ago. With the initiative of the namesake.
      About the tops answered Altone. Each sandpiper praises its swamp.
      This top about land weapons hi
  12. +1
    11 September 2016 11: 51
    Quote: SRC P-15
    You cannot use all the "goodies" in one go. - You may not feel all the charm and "aftertaste" of each of them. Yes

    And most importantly: laughing a few articles - a few fees!
    1. +1
      11 September 2016 13: 33
      And you can write about:
      TOP-2
      TOP-3
      ...
      TOP-100
      ...
      TOP TOP.
      In short, the National Interest will not remain without work. fellow
  13. +1
    11 September 2016 12: 21
    Quote: Tusv
    Armat microarmad was reported to the army a month ago. With the initiative of the namesake.
    About the tops answered Altone. Each sandpiper praises its swamp.
    This top about land weapons

    Hello namesake. I heard about joining the troops. But there is a very big difference between "the Ministry of Defense has purchased and the troops will be supplied with 100 Armata tanks and" 100 Armata tanks will be delivered to the troops. While they, like the T-15, are not in the troops (a dozen does not count). As there is no sniper rifle from "Kalashnikov".
    And the KA-52 can hardly be called "land" weapons laughing
    1. 0
      11 September 2016 13: 17
      The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, on its website, has already posted the video for Tanker’s Day, Armata is also present there.
    2. 0
      11 September 2016 14: 46
      Quote: Old26
      There is only a very big difference between "the Ministry of Defense purchased and 100 Armata tanks will be delivered to the troops."

      Then the Americans are afraid that Armata will be armada, And you are afraid
      Knowing how the MO treats orders - Ordered equally accepted for service, the Criminal Code will be accepted with confiscation
    3. +1
      11 September 2016 15: 42
      T-14 in the troops at the beginning of the year there were 20 pieces.
  14. 0
    11 September 2016 14: 21
    How can I put a tank that is still being tested 1m in the top of armaments?) How can you compare a tank, an armored personnel carrier, a helicopter and a sniper rifle in a TOP that is something like what is needed first?)
    1. +1
      11 September 2016 15: 44
      T-14 is already on the verge. He most likely passed the tests, but has not yet been completely accepted. Although it is already entering the troops, as I understand it.
      1. 0
        11 September 2016 18: 49
        As I understand it, there is a batch of hundreds of vehicles for passing military tests.
  15. 0
    11 September 2016 14: 34
    By the way, I carefully read the first paragraph again
    The National Interest magazine expert Kyle Mizokami compiled a rating list of military equipment that will be in service with the Russian Armed Forces by 2030

    Even on this basis, the TOP-5 itself sins again by the lack of logic
    Okay, you can really agree that by 2030 both the T-14 and T-15 will be in service. But everything else ...
    1. Not the fact that sniper Kalashnikov will be in service by 2030. How many cases we know when a weapon is presented to us, but then its traces are lost. And this is mainly in the shooter. Remember how many pistols were presented to us. The same "Dart", "Pernach", "Berdysh", "Drill" and a few more. And machine guns (submachine guns)? Where is "Thunderstorm", "Bison"? So it is here. Not the fact that it will be in service.
    2. It is extremely unlikely that there will be enough KA-2030s in service in 52. There are very few of them released anyway, and it is unlikely that they will survive another 14 years. Rather, there will be some kind of KA-72 helicopter or something like that. It is also unlikely that the 9K720 Iskander will be in service. If he lives. There is no mass presence either, this is not "Luna-M", which were in the division in the amount of at least a division
  16. +1
    11 September 2016 15: 24
    I liked this device on the "army")

  17. 0
    11 September 2016 18: 36
    Quote: Tibidokh
    In general, I was already used to contesting Majumdar, and then Mizokami appeared.

    "What's the difference?"
  18. 0
    11 September 2016 22: 40
    The US is already painting its planes in the color of our "number". It remains to "convince" the partners to buy Russian weapons and the American military-industrial complex will "die", just as the industry in the United States died, transferring production to China. laughing
  19. 0
    11 September 2016 23: 03
    And where is the T-50 fighter
  20. 0
    12 September 2016 08: 14
    Quote: mgero
    And where is the T-50 fighter

    Good question. Very good. There are two options
    1. Lochovsky rating, from the lantern and the author simply forgot about it.
    2. The author knows information (insider) about the T-50 that we don’t know, which allows him to conclude that the T-50 will not go further than a technology demonstrator and therefore it will simply not be in service by 2030

    And then everyone chooses for himself which option. Like in the song
    "Everyone chooses for himself
    Woman, religion, expensive
    The devil serves or the prophet
    Everyone chooses for himself "
  21. 0
    12 September 2016 08: 19
    Quote: Sovetskiy
    The US is already painting its planes in the color of our "number". It remains to "convince" the partners to buy Russian weapons and the American military-industrial complex will "die", just as the industry in the United States died, transferring production to China. laughing

    You should at least carefully read that information about painting before making a global conclusion that the American military-industrial complex will "die". He, the PVK, like imperialism itself, "dies" for a very, very long time. As my friend said about American imperialism - they have been rotting for 200 years, but how does it smell laughing
    And they paint the planes of the "Aggressor" fighter squadron
  22. 0
    12 September 2016 09: 20
    The main thing "American Xperd" did not notice - the dry ration is awesome, but "Warrior" is convenient. And the technique? Technique is an attachment to the soldier. My opinion.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"