Donald Trump - American Boris Yeltsin?
Less than two months are left until the day of November 8, the election of a new US president. In general, this presidential campaign is unprecedented. Previously, the American presidential election was a game of a thimble, where there was actually one candidate, although in two persons, and the Americans chose only the image of the president, then today is a completely different matter. Today, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton proclaim really different political programs, and swear by this name of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Clinton recently revealed to the world that the United States is a “radiant hail on a hill,” but this is after all a communist “bright future of humanity”, a new edition of communism in the form of “American democratic leadership.” Why? Clinton is from the camp of neoconservatives (neocons), that is, permanent neo-Trotskyists, and therefore dreams of global leadership in communist Trotsky. In the program "The Right to Vote", experts say that Clinton represents 2% of the American elite, infinitely divorced even from the middle, wealthy layers of America. This 2-percentage class is the American "Central Committee of the CPSU", and Clinton is its general secretary.
And who is Trump? An isolationist, a traditionalist, a pragmatist and a realist, one might say, a billionaire from the middle American class. And he says, on the contrary, that America is not in order, and promises to make America great again. The concept of "shining hail on a hill" is in clear contradiction with the concept of "hail, where everything is not in order." In general, Donald Trump is somewhat similar to President John F. Kennedy, who also proposed a new political course, and a rapprochement with Russia-USSR, and changes in America, but he was killed and slandered, however, as president. Bad analogy for Trump.
But there is a more optimistic one. The intensity of the struggle between Trump and Clinton can be explained by a deeper historical by analogy. Trump, in fact, threatens to destroy the neo-Trotskyist CPSU Central Committee of Washington, and this reminds him of Boris Yeltsin, who destroyed the Soviet CPSU Central Committee.
The neocon neo-Trotskyist group came to power in Washington somewhere at the end of the 80 of the twentieth century, both in the ruling parties. And the United States, in fact, began to fulfill the Trotskyist dream of a world permanent revolution, replacing, for conspiracy, the communist flag with a democratic one. That is, the neocons build permanent communism after Trotsky, calling it world democracy. And the United States became the base, or, according to Trotsky, "a bundle of firewood for the world revolution."
By the way, the homosexual component of American democratic communism speaks about the kinship of Russian and American Trotskyism. Homosexuality was a characteristic feature of Soviet communism in its initial period, and it was not only the theory of “love as a glass of water” that Commissioner Alexandra Kollontai, namely Trotsky: he invited his old acquaintances in the USSR, Freudians, to educate the communist young people and even children.
Naked demonstrations of Komsomol members under the slogan: “Down with shame!” Reached distant provinces, but Trotsky was not lucky: Stalin’s son Vasily suffered from progressive education of Freudians in a kindergarten for children of the Soviet nomenclature: children were taught onanism. Stalin and his party comrades were, to put it mildly, furious. After sending Trotsky out of the country, Stalin, in a revolutionary way, did away with Freudianism / Trotskyism, adopting in 1934 a law on criminal punishment for sodomy, and then came the year 1937 ...
This is where the piquant question arises: was it possible that Trotsky was ... It’s not at all necessary, the theoretical constructions can also be manically perverted. Homosexuality comes to the fore in communist / trotsky world projects precisely because they are global!
Theoretically, for any global world project, national and religious borders and traditions of nations become an obstacle, and revolutionaries need to somehow erase them. It is clear that national traditions regulate and rely on family and moral relations - hence it is not difficult to make a discovery: by removing moral restrictions through sexual emancipation, it is possible, as it were, to “naturally” solve the national question on a global scale!
Hence, apparently, a revolutionary Trotsky has an interest in Freudians, in the sexual revolution, or "love as a glass of water." Today, it is promoted by permanent revolutionaries in the form of a struggle for the rights of a homosexual person all over the world. US Vice President Joe Biden said so directly: everyone who does not respect the rights of our LGBT brothers and sisters will “pay their price for this!”
The American concept of world democracy is essentially a new concept of the world communist permanent revolution, it just took a step back, returning to the democratic banner. The color revolutions are all the steps of the world revolution, of which the permanent communists — the Trotskyists — have always spoken!
Since America became the base of the new Trotskyist communism, it received all its “permanent” and homosexual delights in the largest volume. Hence the phenomenon of Donald Trump, not only a billionaire, but also, let's not forget, a father of many children, hence his support for traditional America, which has not yet lost the good old human traits. The fact is that the red-haired billionaire Trump loves his America more than the idea of global neo-Trotsky leadership / domination in the world, especially at American expense. So when Clinton defends his “cherished values,” Trump calls them simply “stupidity.”
The burden of the world revolution is hard to bear even for the States: today, in terms of livability, the United States is inferior to Western Europe and Japan, to its satellites! Just like Russia-USSR, it was inferior to its satellite windows. Clinton's "radiant hail on the hill" Trump calls "fake economy" and threatens to deal with it in order to bring back the greatness of good old America. But can trump repeat the path of Boris Yeltsin and destroy the American Central Committee of the CPSU? ..
The latest CNN poll says that Donald Trump became the leader of the presidential race, 45 percent of respondents are ready to vote for him, Clinton percent - less than 2 percent ...
Clinton recently revealed to the world that the United States is a “radiant hail on a hill,” but this is after all a communist “bright future of humanity”, a new edition of communism in the form of “American democratic leadership.” Why? Clinton is from the camp of neoconservatives (neocons), that is, permanent neo-Trotskyists, and therefore dreams of global leadership in communist Trotsky. In the program "The Right to Vote", experts say that Clinton represents 2% of the American elite, infinitely divorced even from the middle, wealthy layers of America. This 2-percentage class is the American "Central Committee of the CPSU", and Clinton is its general secretary.
And who is Trump? An isolationist, a traditionalist, a pragmatist and a realist, one might say, a billionaire from the middle American class. And he says, on the contrary, that America is not in order, and promises to make America great again. The concept of "shining hail on a hill" is in clear contradiction with the concept of "hail, where everything is not in order." In general, Donald Trump is somewhat similar to President John F. Kennedy, who also proposed a new political course, and a rapprochement with Russia-USSR, and changes in America, but he was killed and slandered, however, as president. Bad analogy for Trump.
But there is a more optimistic one. The intensity of the struggle between Trump and Clinton can be explained by a deeper historical by analogy. Trump, in fact, threatens to destroy the neo-Trotskyist CPSU Central Committee of Washington, and this reminds him of Boris Yeltsin, who destroyed the Soviet CPSU Central Committee.
The neocon neo-Trotskyist group came to power in Washington somewhere at the end of the 80 of the twentieth century, both in the ruling parties. And the United States, in fact, began to fulfill the Trotskyist dream of a world permanent revolution, replacing, for conspiracy, the communist flag with a democratic one. That is, the neocons build permanent communism after Trotsky, calling it world democracy. And the United States became the base, or, according to Trotsky, "a bundle of firewood for the world revolution."
By the way, the homosexual component of American democratic communism speaks about the kinship of Russian and American Trotskyism. Homosexuality was a characteristic feature of Soviet communism in its initial period, and it was not only the theory of “love as a glass of water” that Commissioner Alexandra Kollontai, namely Trotsky: he invited his old acquaintances in the USSR, Freudians, to educate the communist young people and even children.
Naked demonstrations of Komsomol members under the slogan: “Down with shame!” Reached distant provinces, but Trotsky was not lucky: Stalin’s son Vasily suffered from progressive education of Freudians in a kindergarten for children of the Soviet nomenclature: children were taught onanism. Stalin and his party comrades were, to put it mildly, furious. After sending Trotsky out of the country, Stalin, in a revolutionary way, did away with Freudianism / Trotskyism, adopting in 1934 a law on criminal punishment for sodomy, and then came the year 1937 ...
This is where the piquant question arises: was it possible that Trotsky was ... It’s not at all necessary, the theoretical constructions can also be manically perverted. Homosexuality comes to the fore in communist / trotsky world projects precisely because they are global!
Theoretically, for any global world project, national and religious borders and traditions of nations become an obstacle, and revolutionaries need to somehow erase them. It is clear that national traditions regulate and rely on family and moral relations - hence it is not difficult to make a discovery: by removing moral restrictions through sexual emancipation, it is possible, as it were, to “naturally” solve the national question on a global scale!
Hence, apparently, a revolutionary Trotsky has an interest in Freudians, in the sexual revolution, or "love as a glass of water." Today, it is promoted by permanent revolutionaries in the form of a struggle for the rights of a homosexual person all over the world. US Vice President Joe Biden said so directly: everyone who does not respect the rights of our LGBT brothers and sisters will “pay their price for this!”
The American concept of world democracy is essentially a new concept of the world communist permanent revolution, it just took a step back, returning to the democratic banner. The color revolutions are all the steps of the world revolution, of which the permanent communists — the Trotskyists — have always spoken!
Since America became the base of the new Trotskyist communism, it received all its “permanent” and homosexual delights in the largest volume. Hence the phenomenon of Donald Trump, not only a billionaire, but also, let's not forget, a father of many children, hence his support for traditional America, which has not yet lost the good old human traits. The fact is that the red-haired billionaire Trump loves his America more than the idea of global neo-Trotsky leadership / domination in the world, especially at American expense. So when Clinton defends his “cherished values,” Trump calls them simply “stupidity.”
The burden of the world revolution is hard to bear even for the States: today, in terms of livability, the United States is inferior to Western Europe and Japan, to its satellites! Just like Russia-USSR, it was inferior to its satellite windows. Clinton's "radiant hail on the hill" Trump calls "fake economy" and threatens to deal with it in order to bring back the greatness of good old America. But can trump repeat the path of Boris Yeltsin and destroy the American Central Committee of the CPSU? ..
The latest CNN poll says that Donald Trump became the leader of the presidential race, 45 percent of respondents are ready to vote for him, Clinton percent - less than 2 percent ...
Information