Military Review

The DPRK tested the next and most powerful nuclear bomb in the history of the republic

174
In the DPRK, another nuclear test was conducted, TASS official message of the agency TsTAK.




September 9 earlier reported on this in the South Korean military department. “Based on the available data, we concluded that an atomic bomb was being tested in North Korea,” the Ministry of Defense of Kazakhstan said.

The military added that they are conducting further analysis of the incident in order to determine "what kind of fissionable material was used in the bomb."

According to the ministry, "the power of the explosion is estimated at approximately 10 kilotons."

“For comparison, the power of the bomb tested in January of this year was 6 kilotons,” the document says.

This is the fifth nuclear test. weapons. Test explosions were previously carried out in 2006, 2009, 2013, and January 2016.

The President of the Republic of Korea, Park Geun-hye, said that Pyongyang would only exacerbate its isolation with this explosion.

"North Korea 9 September conducted a nuclear test," - she stated.

The president said that “in close cooperation with the international community” she will “seek to toughen the sanctions” and will use “all means to make the DPRK abandon its nuclear ambitions”.
Photos used:
REUTERS / KCNA
174 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Evgeny RS
    Evgeny RS 9 September 2016 08: 38
    +5
    What can I say, well done. Nuclear weapons will cool the ardor of the United States.
    1. Ryabtsev Grigory Evgenievich
      Ryabtsev Grigory Evgenievich 9 September 2016 08: 43
      +12
      Maybe well done, but with the adequacy of these guys are not really. It would be better to feed the people.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 08: 50
        +25
        Ryabtsev Grigory Evgenievich Today, 08:43 ↑
        Maybe well done, but with the adequacy of these guys are not really. It would be better to feed the people.
        and what, in fact, did they do "inadequate"? and what is actually in the asset, the "adequate" Americans, or Europe? Korea has verbal threats, America has destroyed countries and corpses ... corpses ... so who is "inadequate"?
        1. gray smeet
          gray smeet 9 September 2016 08: 55
          +4
          That's about the inadequate one and the speech-they are the first to call for the nuclear bomb in North Korea .. belay And next to Vladivostok (and not only ..) and hello!
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 05
            +5
            Quote: gray smeet
            And next to Vladivostok (and not only ..) and hello!

            But he does not live in the Far East;
            1. Andrey Yuryevich
              Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 09: 11
              +4
              you are also far from Beloyarsk NPP, but I do not blame you ...
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 20
                +6
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                you are also far from Beloyarsk NPP, but I do not blame you ...

                Beloyarsk NPP is run by a schizophrenic from North Korea?
                1. Andrey Yuryevich
                  Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 09: 25
                  +7
                  Alexander Romanov Today, 09:20 ↑
                  ...
                  Beloyarsk NPP is run by a schizophrenic from North Korea?
                  on "Chernobyl" schizophrenic arranged everything?
                  1. Alexander Romanov
                    Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 41
                    +4
                    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                    on "Chernobyl" schizophrenic arranged everything?

                    No, but I see you don’t even see the difference between the possibility of a nuclear conflict near the borders of Russia and the possibility of an accident.
                    1. Andrey Yuryevich
                      Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 09: 54
                      +8
                      Alexander Romanov
                      Today, 09: 41 ↑
                      I see you don’t even see the difference between the possibility of a nuclear conflict near the borders of Russia and the possibility of an accident.
                      Sasha, was there an accident? Was there a nuclear conflict? no! what is the ratio? so what are you talking about? yes, there is more chance that the "bearded" otchebut such somewhere than Korea.
                      1. Alexander Romanov
                        Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 10: 16
                        +1
                        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                        was there a nuclear conflict? no!

                        Hiroshima and Nagasaki passed you by.
          2. Vadim237
            Vadim237 9 September 2016 11: 07
            0
            The Far East in 1985 already survived the mini Chernobyl.
        2. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 04
          +4
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          and what, in fact, did they do "inadequate"?

          And what are they doing adequate? Look at Kim’s face, everything is written on his forehead. And forever smiles.
          One girl on a construction site fell a brick on her head, she, too, is always smiling now.
          1. Andrey Yuryevich
            Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 09: 06
            +13
            from adequate, their country is protected from "democracy". And in our country half of the government also smiles ... so what?
            1. gray smeet
              gray smeet 9 September 2016 09: 13
              +8
              While Kimushka did not indulge in vigorous bombs - no one needed him, the DPRK was happy with everything ... They even sent food when people died in the DPRK like flies, and then suddenly a slaughtered people were needed ... that's where!
              1. 34 region
                34 region 9 September 2016 09: 23
                +9
                09.13. Well, Yugoslavia also did not indulge, and Iraq, and Libya, and even Syria were not related to the core. And what? Yes, even Yanyk on the outskirts was not fond of this! And what? Do not believe it! Even our disabled Olympians did not touch the nucleus with a single dream. And they, too, bam! Sanctions!
              2. Gray brother
                Gray brother 9 September 2016 11: 41
                +4
                While Kimushka did not indulge in vigorous bombs - no one needed him,

                So they would have left him alone, would not have indulged in sanctions, then hunger would not have been in the UK and nuclear bombs.
            2. FREGATEN
              FREGATEN 9 September 2016 09: 14
              +2
              That's right .... and an exceptional nation generally grinds its teeth in life ......................
          2. adept666
            adept666 9 September 2016 09: 47
            +4
            And what are they doing adequate?
            Yes, in fact, the same thing as we are only to the best of our abilities and capabilities, aren't we? They threaten nuclear weapons to those who dare to attack their country, well, so do not touch them, that's all. In our country, the use of nuclear weapons is spelled out in the doctrine, has the GDP more than once openly recalled this fact during various interviews and speeches, did we actually do the same, so are we also inadequate?
          3. Uncle Murzik
            Uncle Murzik 9 September 2016 12: 07
            +4
            something as Romanov writes "inadequate" KIM has not unleashed one war, but adequate Americans are constantly fighting all over the world!
            1. 0255
              0255 9 September 2016 13: 32
              +1
              Quote: Uncle Murzik
              something as Romanov writes "inadequate" KIM has not unleashed one war, but adequate Americans are constantly fighting all over the world!

              But Kim arranged for his citizens totalitarianism with the prohibitions of everything and everything, poverty, hunger and praise of his beloved. You, fans of Kim, at heart understand this, because not one of you left to live in DPRK laughing
              1. Uncle Murzik
                Uncle Murzik 9 September 2016 18: 03
                0
                but actually this is the DPRK’s internal business, how they should live! will do without advisers! laughing
                1. 0255
                  0255 9 September 2016 18: 50
                  +1
                  Quote: Uncle Murzik
                  but actually this is the DPRK’s internal business, how they should live! will do without advisers! laughing

                  I would like to live like North Koreans, in hunger, poverty, without the Internet, a personal car, the opportunity to even leave the city in which you live?
                  1. Uncle Murzik
                    Uncle Murzik 10 September 2016 10: 43
                    0
                    Well, in Russia, the minimum wage is also 7500 rubles, and the cost of living is 9900! also hungry! Well, not such horror stories you will tell the liberals! I remember that they wrote about the USSR
        3. rotmistr60
          rotmistr60 9 September 2016 09: 13
          +5
          For Andrey Yuryevich
          and what, in fact, did they do "inadequate"?

          I will fully support you. The country has been sanctioned by the United States for decades (after the end of the war in 1953, when both the Americans and the South Korean sixes were tapped for rubbish, though with our and Chinese help, but tapped), what should this state be like? What is strengthening their defenses is that all countries are doing or are trying to do.
      2. Flinky
        Flinky 9 September 2016 08: 56
        +5
        And why did you decide that they have problems with food? Koreans are not Russian; their table traditionally does not break with food.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 06
          +4
          Quote: Flinky
          And why did you decide that they have problems with food? Koreans are not Russian; their table traditionally does not break with food.

          In South Korea, tables. Like in Russia.
          1. Andrey Yuryevich
            Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 09: 18
            +4
            . Alexander Romanov
            In South Korea, tables. Like in Russia
            . cabbage soup, potatoes with bacon, sauerkraut, salted cucumbers? wassat
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 22
              +1
              Quote: Andrey Yurievich
              cabbage soup, potatoes with bacon, sauerkraut, salted cucumbers?

              Go to the restaurant of Korean cuisine and you won’t write more such posts
              1. Andrey Yuryevich
                Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 09: 28
                +1
                Alexander Romanov
                Go to the restaurant of Korean cuisine and you won’t write more such posts
                with such a pension then? ha ... funny ... I have a potato registered ...
                1. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 42
                  0
                  Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                  with such a pension then? ha ... funny ..

                  Then why do you write, what do not you know?
                  1. Andrey Yuryevich
                    Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 09: 57
                    +2
                    Alexander Romanov
                    Today, 09: 42 ↑
                    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                    with such a pension then? ha ... funny ..
                    Then why do you write, what do not you know?
                    there I have a question mark at the end ... I asked, and not "wrote what I do not know." request
                    1. Alexander Romanov
                      Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 10: 17
                      0
                      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                      there I have a question mark at the end ... I asked, and not "wrote what I do not know."

                      Well, there’s no money for a cafe, stop by the Korean cuisine
                      1. Andrey Yuryevich
                        Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 10: 25
                        +4
                        Alexander Romanov
                        Today,
                        Well, there’s no money for a cafe, stop by the Korean cuisine
                        if you will be there, and then with whom will I "fight" then? laughing
              2. 34 region
                34 region 9 September 2016 09: 29
                0
                09.22. Romanov! What's in a Korean restaurant? Here are their snacks this from poverty?
                1. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 43
                  0
                  Quote: Region 34
                  What's in a Korean restaurant?

                  So stop by, otherwise I understand that in addition to salads, which you call snacks. (You probably use them for the intended purpose of snacks, under vodka) you do not know anything else.
                  1. Simpsonian
                    Simpsonian 9 September 2016 11: 22
                    +1
                    Well, it's good that at least cats like the Chinese do not eat.
                2. miru mir
                  miru mir 10 September 2016 10: 11
                  0
                  Koreans have a very rich cuisine ...
        2. Gray brother
          Gray brother 9 September 2016 11: 45
          +3
          Quote: Flinky
          And why did you decide that they have problems with food?

          They have problems with the energy sector - with fuel in the above privacy, and through this they have problems with everything else, because of sanctions in the first place. If China had not helped them, then they would have nothing to eat.
        3. vlad_vlad
          vlad_vlad 9 September 2016 22: 24
          +1
          Quote: Flinky
          And why did you decide that they have problems with food? Koreans are not Russian; their table traditionally does not break with food.


          well yes. Severe North Koreans do not eat. They get calories out of love for Kim.
          and thin because they love sports. and they love sports because sport is the world. the world is kim. kim is a nuclear bomb. here everything fell into place.
          And in South Korea they don’t like Kim, so they’re thick. but the Americans are to blame for this. also thick. and in general they destroyed the Indians and Hiroshima.

          and North Korea must be loved because Americans do not like them. love them no more.
      3. Gray brother
        Gray brother 9 September 2016 08: 59
        +4
        Quote: Ryabtsev Grigory Evgenievich
        Maybe well done, but with the adequacy of these guys are not really. It would be better to feed the people.

        I agree with the South Korean sixes of the USA that everything is rotten with adequacy - for some reason no one noticed the test except for them.
        What is this getting? Seismic waves are now only one way to extend the tunnel?
        1. gray smeet
          gray smeet 9 September 2016 09: 04
          +4
          BEIJING, Sep 8 - RIA Novosti, Ivan Bulatov. Beijing strongly opposes the DPRK nuclear test, said a statement by the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

          "Today, the DPRK, despite the protests of the international community, again conducted nuclear tests, the Chinese government is strongly opposed to this," the statement reads.


          But our comrades - all of God's growth!
          1. Gray brother
            Gray brother 9 September 2016 09: 12
            +2
            Quote: gray smeet
            BEIJING, Sep 8 - RIA Novosti, Ivan Bulatov. Beijing strongly opposes the DPRK nuclear test, said a statement by the Chinese Foreign Ministry.
            "Today, the DPRK, despite the protests of the international community, again conducted nuclear tests, the Chinese government is strongly opposed to this," the statement reads.

            So they would have posted a normal article, otherwise there is no faith in South Korean media - they have already shot half of the DPRK government from anti-aircraft guns, and the other half from a mortar.
            1. gray smeet
              gray smeet 9 September 2016 09: 20
              +2
              Beijing is China! what is south korea? Did you skip geography lessons? wassat
              1. Gray brother
                Gray brother 9 September 2016 09: 33
                +1
                Beijing is China! what is south korea?

                I have not seen in the article, on VO, the words "Beijing" and "China"
                But then I read it:
                This was reported in the South Korean military.

                President of the Republic of Korea Park Geun-hye said
                1. Simpsonian
                  Simpsonian 9 September 2016 11: 26
                  +3
                  China, just as 65 years ago, Amers, with all their UN, swept out of North Korea with our participation, will sweep them out again.
          2. 34 region
            34 region 9 September 2016 09: 34
            +2
            09.04/XNUMX. ??? Bright elves, despite public opinion, are persistently imposing US opinion on international issues. How does this affect US policy? But amer, this is God's dew!
            1. gray smeet
              gray smeet 9 September 2016 09: 56
              +2
              Well, the Chinese Foreign Ministry is "obviously" instilling the US opinion! wassat But there is such a "34 region" in Russia, he will enlighten both the PRC Foreign Ministry and the Russian Foreign Ministry!
          3. GYGOLA
            GYGOLA 9 September 2016 10: 44
            +2
            For protection or not, the case is the 10th. Today, no one is interested in expanding weapons of mass destruction. There is nothing good in spreading nuclear weapons across countries. Since 2006, the DPRK has been a nuclear threat, albeit potential ... Who is next ... Diplomacy, if any, will be whispering. And life on Earth, with the speed of a sprinter, will rush to the finish ...
          4. Uncle Murzik
            Uncle Murzik 9 September 2016 12: 11
            0
            MOSCOW, Sep 9 - PRIME. After a nuclear test conducted by North Korea, China called on all parties to the Korean Peninsula to avoid provocation and to act with caution. This statement was made by the representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, Hua Chunying, RIA Novosti reports.

            "We believe,
        2. 0255
          0255 9 September 2016 13: 39
          0
          Quote: Gray Brother
          Quote: Ryabtsev Grigory Evgenievich
          Maybe well done, but with the adequacy of these guys are not really. It would be better to feed the people.

          I agree with the South Korean sixes of the USA that everything is rotten with adequacy - for some reason no one noticed the test except for them.
          What is this getting? Seismic waves are now only one way to extend the tunnel?

          You defend Kim, but why do you have the flag of rotting USA? belay
      4. skarl
        skarl 9 September 2016 09: 53
        +2
        And the Americans with adequate adequacy ??? What they climb into the South China Sea ??? Everywhere their wing is pork ....
      5. 0255
        0255 9 September 2016 13: 28
        +1
        Quote: Ryabtsev Grigory Evgenievich
        Maybe well done, but with the adequacy of these guys are not really. It would be better to feed the people.

        Kim fans argue that for the sake of the "great sun-like" Kim Jong-un, North Koreans are not a sin to starve. And the North Koreans are sorry, because all the "delights" of the DPRK's life fall on them, and not on the couch Juche, who love Kimav from a distance
        1. Uncle Murzik
          Uncle Murzik 9 September 2016 18: 07
          0
          Yes, you also change the flag to Ovskiy, maybe they will feed enough! laughing
          1. 0255
            0255 9 September 2016 20: 56
            0
            Quote: Uncle Murzik
            Yes, you also change the flag to Ovskiy, maybe they will feed enough! laughing

            I’m quite happy with the Belarusian flag.
            1. Uncle Murzik
              Uncle Murzik 10 September 2016 10: 45
              0
              Well dad did not protest! laughing so cover yourself
    2. BOB044
      BOB044 9 September 2016 08: 45
      +5
      At least before you write your head against the wall, beat so that the brains fall into place. hi
    3. mgero
      mgero 9 September 2016 08: 52
      +1
      Well, you logic ..... Nature is bursting at the seams from the action of the man, and only America is in your head.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 09: 04
        +7
        mgero
        Today, 08: 52 ↑
        Well, you logic ..... Nature is bursting at the seams from the action of the man, and only America is in your head.
        yes ... Bikini Atoll, Nevada, Aleutian Islands, Lob Nor, Novaya Zemlya, Semipalatinsk, Enivetok Atoll, Kiribati Island ... continue? and Korea of ​​course: horror, horror ...!
      2. gg.na
        gg.na 9 September 2016 09: 08
        +4
        And what now because of this, that nature is bursting at the seams; now we must go to bed under the shit ??! Or get up in a pose zyu ??! Let the whole world go to ruin, but go to bed under the frost sowing. Korea is not going to !!! And rightly so !!! good
    4. Finches
      Finches 9 September 2016 09: 08
      0
      A bomb is a bomb, but reliable delivery vehicles are also needed!

      Let's be objective - if the United States decides to roll the Koreans into blooming, then they can do it without a ground operation, however, in this case you will not envy the southerners! Only one thing saves Korea - the proximity to Russia and China, and perhaps the worthlessness of its territory!

      In the case of North Korea, I always recall the expression of Anton Pavlovich Chekhov: |"If in the first act there is a gun on the wall, then in the last one it will certainly shoot."
      1. 34 region
        34 region 9 September 2016 09: 19
        +2
        09.08/XNUMX. This is if the United States is sharpening a tooth on the DPRK then they still gag on them? Like in Syria. Assad must leave!
        1. Monster_Fat
          Monster_Fat 9 September 2016 09: 56
          +5
          Whatever they say, but "the presence of nuclear weapons" so far (namely "FOREVER") is the only really working "deterrent" from the aggression of neighboring states or from total "democratization" by the Americans and their sixes, as well as the guarantor of an independent external and internal politicians...
      2. Strength
        Strength 9 September 2016 16: 39
        0
        Even if North Korea wants to unite with South, South Korea is unlikely to want it. This connection will cost the southerners $ 1 trillion.
  2. gray smeet
    gray smeet 9 September 2016 08: 38
    +4
    The Russian Far East was "delighted"! There, Kim's admirers have already woken up ...
    The Chinese have protested, and our comrades clap their hands ...
    1. Evgeny RS
      Evgeny RS 9 September 2016 08: 42
      +3
      And how else can you protect the country from am. imperialism?
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 08: 46
        +5
        Evgeny RS
        Today, 08: 42 ↑
        And how else can you protect the country from am. imperialism?
        from "democracy"!
        1. gg.na
          gg.na 9 September 2016 09: 05
          +3
          Well-u-u-uuu does not want to sit down. Korea of ​​this rotten "democracy" in their country !!! But no, all one is trying to crush the geeks zaluzhnye-freaks! Will not work!!! Let the "Red Bogatyr" candy suck wassat and forget about sowing. Korea !!! wink
      2. gray smeet
        gray smeet 9 September 2016 08: 50
        +1
        And if the United States decides not to flirt more and be the first to launch a nuclear strike on the DPRK? Have you thought about such a scenario? How does this help protect the DPRK from Am. Imperialism? Or do you doubt that in the event of which the USA will strike such a blow? And with each test of the DPRK, such a scenario is getting closer ...
        1. adept666
          adept666 9 September 2016 09: 00
          +6
          And if the United States decides not to flirt more and be the first to launch a nuclear strike on the DPRK?
          North Korea is our neighbor with the PRC, any missiles flying towards us will be qualified as an attack on our territory (and the Chinese, respectively, on their territory), the distances there are not great, there is no time to make an informed decision on the reciprocal counter millet. The United States knows this very well, so nothing like this will happen.
          1. gray smeet
            gray smeet 9 September 2016 09: 03
            +3
            And who told you that the United States will attack with ballistic missiles? Others, what not? Then sleep peacefully, let the neighbor behind the wall indulge in a gas stove ....
            1. adept666
              adept666 9 September 2016 09: 32
              +3
              Others, what not?
              Yes, but their use will also be qualified as ballistic launches. In addition, they can now launch them only from the water, and as soon as the US fleet appears there, our fleet with the PRC will appear there (similar to Syria), so using the KR in conditions of the presence of other navies in the combat zone will mean the beginning of 3 World War II.
              Then sleep peacefully, let the neighbor behind the wall indulge in a gas stove ....
              I think not indulging in a good life. Maybe it’s worth some less people not to go in their waters with their own warships and not conduct exercises where there is a difficult political situation between the two halves of one artificially divided people, provoking our neighbor behind the wall? Let me remind you: the Yongbyon reactor was mothballed, its temperature control system was destroyed thanks to the actions of primarily Russia and China, relations between the North and the South improved. I can also remind those who began to escalate the situation with the definitions of the Axis of Evil and the military exercises imposed on Southerners, as well as I can remind you that only nuclear weapons are now a guarantee, but they also have no alternatives to our sovereignty, and I want to live on my land and on their land to be not slaves, but masters. Is the Russian Federation and China ready to guarantee the sovereignty of the UK in the face of US aggression? And will the SC believe in him after the USSR did not openly take their side, but that was the USSR, not even the Russian Federation?
        2. rotmistr60
          rotmistr60 9 September 2016 09: 05
          +2
          And if the US decides not to flirt more and first strike a nuclear strike on the DPRK? Have you thought about such a scenario?

          And you did not think that the DPRK borders on Russian Primorye? To strike a nuclear strike against the DPRK is to partially defeat the territory of Russia. Will the United States go for it? Before expressing strategic intentions for the United States, it would be better to recall geography.
          And by the way, not "the first", but the first.
          1. gray smeet
            gray smeet 9 September 2016 09: 11
            +2
            And if they go for it? There is even a reason - the DPRK threatened to launch a nuclear strike! - why not a reason! And Russia will be warned, but what?
            1. Simpsonian
              Simpsonian 9 September 2016 11: 30
              0
              We’ll also warn you, and then with China we will divide Alaska and Canada on the account of Primorye - there will be the least radioactive contamination from North American divided territories. laughing
              1. gray smeet
                gray smeet 9 September 2016 12: 47
                +2
                Quote: Simpsonian
                We’ll also warn you, and then with China we will divide Alaska and Canada on the account of Primorye - there will be the least radioactive contamination from North American divided territories. laughing


                Kindergarten! How old are you ?
              2. 0255
                0255 9 September 2016 13: 44
                0
                Quote: Simpsonian
                We’ll also warn you, and then with China we will divide Alaska and Canada on the account of Primorye - there will be the least radioactive contamination from North American divided territories. laughing

                Are you a Kim fan too? Why do you have a flag of rotting Germany? Why did you leave for Germany and not for DPRK?
                1. Uncle Murzik
                  Uncle Murzik 9 September 2016 18: 10
                  +1
                  and Belarus did not protest, so change the flag! laughing
                2. Anglorussian
                  Anglorussian 10 September 2016 10: 20
                  0
                  Why do you have a flag of rotting Germany?
                  This is Simpson! He will not be able to enter here without a proxy, which is why the flag is. And this alkopatriot lives on Russian open spaces, along with bad roads being a Russian traditional misfortune.
                  1. Simpsonian
                    Simpsonian 12 September 2016 12: 16
                    0
                    How is your goat doing there, islander? Do you sell all tickets for Russian river camping trips? bully
        3. 34 region
          34 region 9 September 2016 09: 14
          +1
          08.50. Let's say they decided to strike at North Korea. Start. How to determine where rockets fly? In the DPRK, PRC, Russia? Let’s hit the DPRK. What about the radiation around? Type of South Korea, Japan, China, Russia. Or maybe blow towards the USA. hi
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 9 September 2016 11: 11
            +1
            If the United States attacks North Korea, then only cruise missiles and aircraft.
        4. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 09: 15
          +1
          gray smeet
          And if the United States decides not to flirt more and be the first to launch a nuclear strike on the DPRK? We did not think about such a scenario development
          ? Yeah, and at the same time they will hook Yu.Korea, Japan, China, and us ... you yourself are adequate with such thoughts? nobody needs a global paragraph ....
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 25
            +2
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            ? Yeah, and at the same time they will hook Yu.Korea, Japan, China, and us ... you yourself are adequate with such thoughts? nobody needs a global paragraph ....

            Oops, and you yourself understand that they will not attack the DPRK. So what kind of banana, you convince everyone above that the DPRK is protecting itself from possible US aggression.
            1. Andrey Yuryevich
              Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 09: 41
              +3
              Alexander Romanov
              Oops, and you yourself understand that they will not attack the DPRK. So what kind of banana, you convince everyone above that the DPRK is protecting itself from possible US aggression.
              oops! but such a "banana" and do not attack that nuclear weapons looms! but to convince, I do not convince anyone, I express my point of view ...
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 10: 18
                +2
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                oops! but such a "banana" and do not attack that nuclear weapons looms!

                Oh, why didn’t they attack. When did North Korea have no nuclear weapons? Yes, because North Korea fuck nobody needs!
                1. gg.na
                  gg.na 9 September 2016 10: 43
                  +2
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Oh, why didn’t they attack. When did North Korea have no nuclear weapons?

                  Yes, because they know that they will get the go-ahead wassat wort !!! wassat
                2. Ivan Ivanov
                  Ivan Ivanov 9 September 2016 14: 15
                  +2
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Yes, because North Korea fuck nobody needs!

                  After the Balkans, North Africa, the Middle East, who can vouch for the security of the DPRK?
            2. 34 region
              34 region 9 September 2016 09: 43
              +4
              09.25. Romanov! Well, NATO expansion is certainly not aggression! This insidious Russia is moving towards the borders of NATO! Oh well! We are also expressed concern about the military exercises and flights of our aircraft! Are we also inadequate and threaten everyone? How many of our (and DPRK) bases in other countries? How many countries have we (and the DPRK) bombed?
            3. gray smeet
              gray smeet 9 September 2016 09: 45
              +5
              Alexander Romanov - for many, false patriotism rolls over. And I even admit that many would be happy if the North Koreans launched a nuclear charge in the United States. That's where the euphoria would be!
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 10: 20
                +2
                Quote: gray smeet
                Alexander Romanov - for many, false patriotism rolls over.

                Especially the 34th region, I don’t even want to answer him, so as not to spoil my nerves laughing
        5. gg.na
          gg.na 9 September 2016 09: 15
          +1
          Quote: gray smeet
          And if the United States decides not to flirt more and be the first to launch a nuclear strike on the DPRK?

          Well, let them even try to see what happens !!! Or is it scary ?! bully hey hey hey !!! So if fear overcomes them, let them sit quietly and not blather! Here is Eun’s words that do not diverge from the deed and he does not throw his words into the wind !!! Said - done !!! And the frustrations only crack with tongue, but affairs are not visible !!! Bazaar women !!! Fu already pulls from such geeks !!!
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 46
            +4
            Quote: gg.na
            Here is Eun’s words that do not diverge from the deed and he doesn’t throw his words into the wind !!! Said - done !!!

            250 times said that he would drown Seoul in a sea of ​​fire. He said that he would destroy the United States 1250 times. The greatest of the living whistlebolders. North Korean Mr. Treplo, world-wide.
            1. gg.na
              gg.na 9 September 2016 10: 30
              0
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Quote: gg.na
              Here is Eun’s words that do not diverge from the deed and he doesn’t throw his words into the wind !!! Said - done !!!

              250 times said that he would drown Seoul in a sea of ​​fire. He said that he would destroy the United States 1250 times. The greatest of the living whistlebolders. North Korean Mr. Treplo, world-wide.

              So he goes to this !!! And in the end he will do what he says !!! We must create something with the help of which all this will do! And this is a significant nuclear power. And as soon as everything is ready, then there will be business !!! lol I will be very happy about this good !!! Patience buddy, patience !!! Everything has its time!!! wink
      3. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 06
        +2
        Quote: Eugene RS
        And how else can you protect the country from am. imperialism?

        And in North Korea, someone is going to attack?
        1. rotmistr60
          rotmistr60 9 September 2016 09: 21
          0
          gray smeet is already making strategic assumptions.
        2. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 09: 23
          +3
          Alexander Romanov Today, 09:06 ↑

          And in North Korea, someone is going to attack?
          Do you need to be announced on the radio? But who is going to attack Germany? But for impudence and storage?
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 09: 48
            +1
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            Do you need to be announced on the radio?

            So you yourself wrote above that no one will attack the DPRK wassat
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            But who is going to attack Germany? But for impudence and storage?

            Well, based on your logic in this topic, Russia must definitely attack Germany and Storage.
            1. Andrey Yuryevich
              Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 10: 28
              +3
              Quote: Andrey Yurievich
              But who is going to attack Germany? But for impudence and storage?
              Alexander Romanov: Well, based on your logic in this topic, Russia must definitely attack Germany and Storage.
              the question is, why do they need nuclear weapons, and why Korea can't? and following your logic: why do we need nuclear weapons? so ask the states, are they going to attack us? will say no! all missile defense and "tomahawks" only against Iran and North Koreans! Do you believe them? here is Eun, "he believes." .. but arms himself. In general, it is strange, it seems you Eun, more than Babama "love", although it is not clear why ...
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 10: 49
                +1
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                the question is, why do they need nuclear weapons,

                Who do they need?
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                and why is it impossible for Korea?

                The fewer countries have it, the more stable the world
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                and following your logic: why do we need nuclear weapons?

                And too often we are attacked - this is the first. And second, Russia is a counterweight to the West. And what is the DPRK? -one continuous hemorrhage for both the USA and Russia with China
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                ask the states, are they going to attack us? they say no!

                You wrote yesterday too, that warriors will not be
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                In general, it is strange, it seems you Eun, more than Babama "love", although it is not clear why ..

                And why should I love him, a schizophrenic with Napoleon’s ambitions at the borders of Russia is sitting and waving a nuclear club for any reason.
                1. Andrey Yuryevich
                  Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 12: 06
                  +2
                  Alexander Romanov Today, 10:49 ↑
                  Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                  the question is, why do they need nuclear weapons,
                  [quote] Who should they? [/ quote WEST.
                  Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                  and why is it impossible for Korea?
                  [quote] The fewer countries have it, the more stable the world [/ quote] well, there was no nuclear weapons in Korea, was it stable? and yes, yesterday I wrote that there would be no war, and today I will repeat it, since nuclear weapons still hold back! [quote] And for what I love him, there is a schizophrenic with Napoleon’s ambitions at the borders of Russia and waving a nuclear club for any reason. [/ quote] you know ... scares the arrogant ...! and where does the doctor come from? winked
          2. gg.na
            gg.na 9 September 2016 10: 36
            +2
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            But who is going to attack Germany? But for impudence and storage?

            That's it!!! You are right at 100% as the West and other mongrel yell and screech that Russia was going to attack them so here they are true to horror ... wassat And how about sowing. Korea comes up with a speech so if you are so kind to present proof! Let North Korea create both powerful nuclear weapons and means of delivery of this nuclear weapons to any corner of the globe !!! drinks !!!!
        3. adept666
          adept666 9 September 2016 09: 55
          +4
          And in North Korea, someone is going to attack?
          Ahah yes friends are all around: South Caucasus, Japan, USA. Did anyone want to attack Libya? And to Iraq? Maybe Afghanistan, what is wrong? By the way, from the axis of evil only SK has not yet raked so-and-so. From the Panama Canal, Panama owns only the name, Yugoslavia, oh sorry and the state is no longer there ... Syria, thanks to the Russian Federation, also seems to have not touched anyone with its internal problems. But Vietnam, for which he has been beating millions of lives? Of course, no one is going around alone pacifists conduct military exercises near the waters of the North Caucasus and, by the way, conduct our exercises too laughing
          1. gray smeet
            gray smeet 9 September 2016 10: 05
            +1
            YES stop, who needed North Korea could take its "warm" in the 90s. And no one would interfere, neither Russia (you know why), nor the PRC ... Another question, why at that moment the USA, South Korea, Great Britain were sending food to the DPRK? ....... Well these are the imperialists !? They should have razed and unified Korea, approached the border of China and Russia! Why Karl, they didn't! Give me an answer, Karl!
            1. gray smeet
              gray smeet 9 September 2016 10: 29
              +2
              North Korea as a separate state suited all the "Players" in the region. First of all, the United States - they used and still use the DPRK as a scarecrow. The United States is keeping both Japan and South Korea for Faberge with the help of North Korea - very convenient - there is no need to look for the motivation for its military presence in these countries. And at the same time, it is always close to such countries as Russia (the Far East is practically under constant sight) and the PRC. What is called convenient (non-sinkable aircraft carriers). If not for such a history of relations before, I would have thought that Eun is allied with the United States! Although ......... Eun studied in Switzerland for a long time and with whom we talked there we cannot know ... wassat
              1. 0255
                0255 9 September 2016 13: 55
                +2
                Quote: gray smeet
                Although ......... Eun studied for a long time in Switzerland and with whom we talked there we cannot know .... wassat

                That Kim studied in decaying Switzerland, Kim fans do not bother request
                1. Uncle Murzik
                  Uncle Murzik 9 September 2016 18: 16
                  +2
                  Peter the first also studied in Europe! belay
              2. adept666
                adept666 9 September 2016 14: 55
                +1
                North Korea as a separate state suited all "Players" in the region.
                These are just your speculations, in fact, in 1994, a full-scale military operation was initiated against North Korea initiated by Mr. Clinton.
                they have used and are still using the DPRK as a scarecrow.
                The RF and the PRC are better suited for the role of the scarecrow, they simply outplayed themselves with the IC, and now they have nuclear weapons (and RSRD) and the operation against them without the use of nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons is no longer such an easy walk.
                USA holds Faberge for Japan and South Korea with the help of S. Korea
                I’ve been looking at Japan like this since 1945, as if no IC had existed and nothing had changed since that time, so the United States wouldn’t explain anything to them because they were under occupation, and the United States never considered the opinions of its slaves and never justified anything for their bases.
            2. adept666
              adept666 9 September 2016 14: 47
              +3
              Russia! Why Carl, they didn’t! Give an answer, Karl!
              Maybe you’ll come up with something of your own, otherwise it looks hackneyed and yellow? wink Well, now to the point: in 1994, seeing that the Soviet bloc had essentially died out completely (the USSR no longer exists, the PRC as a factor is still "not present"), during the negotiations between Mr. their programs not only in relation to nuclear weapons, but also other types of weapons (missile), although now explain to me who decided that a country drowned in blood all BV can have missiles, and the NC is not even possible for the development of a peaceful space program? At the same time, the UK knew that Clinton was already preparing an intervention and on his desk was a report from Generals Shalikashvili and Laka about possible losses and the cost of the operation. Victory, but not an easy walk. We decided to try to buy and sent Carter (see above). In return, the US pledged to supply both fuel and food. And here they missed, they thought they had bought an IC like South Korea and their comrades were in their pockets. And I must say that this was almost the case. The SK sat in silence and ate "hamburgers", did not build anything and did not develop anything, and even began to communicate better with YuK. Mr. Bush comes to power and then the United States, thinking that the UK has already broken it, is starting to put forward more and more new demands (like any unilateral monitoring by the United States, not even the IAEA). He gets a refusal and immediately accuses the UK of the development of the nuclear weapons program (although the IAEA did not have such information) and brings it into the Axis of Evil. But here the PRC is already connected (in 2002 they were already almost the PRC), and then the Russian Federation, under a common batch, and in 2004, settle the situation in a 6-sided format.
            3. Uncle Murzik
              Uncle Murzik 9 September 2016 18: 20
              +2
              Yes, after the Americans got in Korea and then in Vietnam, they lost their desire! It’s not for them to fight the Arabs
          2. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 10: 21
            0
            Quote: adept666
            Did anyone want to attack Libya? And to Iraq?

            There is one subtlety Libya and Iraq do not border Russia and China.
            1. adept666
              adept666 9 September 2016 13: 47
              +1
              There is one subtlety Libya and Iraq do not border Russia and China.
              And what follows from this? Someone really bayonets for SK intervene? And for the Russian Federation, if we assume that we do not have nuclear weapons? The answers are obvious. So it turns out that nuclear weapons are now the only means of at least some against external aggression. And we and the management of the UK perfectly understand this.
        4. gg.na
          gg.na 9 September 2016 10: 46
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          And in North Korea, someone is going to attack?

          And in the Baltic States, Poland and other mongrels, is it going to what attack RUSSIA ??!
    2. Uncle Murzik
      Uncle Murzik 9 September 2016 12: 12
      0
      MOSCOW, Sep 9 - PRIME. After a nuclear test conducted by North Korea, China called on all parties to the Korean Peninsula to avoid provocation and to act with caution. This statement was made by the representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, Hua Chunying, RIA Novosti reports.

      "We believe,
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 9 September 2016 12: 43
        0
        What do you believe in? What is China testing nuclear weapons at North Korea’s test sites? And if so, what will be your reaction?
    3. Gradus HuK
      Gradus HuK 9 September 2016 23: 03
      +2
      Clapping is not a slam; this is a personal matter. The DPRK was not our enemy. And it was high time for terrorists from the states to grab their claws overseas from the ocean. And put their embargoes and sanctions in one place!
  3. RussianRoulette
    RussianRoulette 9 September 2016 08: 40
    0
    The wider the eyes - the narrower the point ... sorry :)
  4. Muvka
    Muvka 9 September 2016 08: 43
    +1
    A typo in the news. If you look at it from the news list, there is the power of the previous explosion, it says 6 megatons.
    1. olegfbi
      olegfbi 9 September 2016 08: 51
      0
      So you have revealed the characteristics ...!
      Correspondents use what they have!
      The real characteristics of our MO are known, but this is state. secret.
  5. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 08: 43
    +4
    on the photo: "Nothing is as contagious as the laughter of a boss ...!" (Russian radio) lol
  6. olegfbi
    olegfbi 9 September 2016 08: 43
    +1
    The duty shift and command of the SSK MO RF, once again, had a Nervous and hard night !!!
    However, everything was fixed and objective facts were reported to the political leadership of Russia!
  7. BOB044
    BOB044 9 September 2016 08: 50
    +1
    The closeness of the DPRK will not bring to good. They can make a bomb of any power. And how will they deliver it to the goal. Missiles they fly at 500-1000 cells. And then they will carry on a stretcher.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 9 September 2016 11: 25
      +1
      They have an analogue of our BR R 27 - she flies 3000 kilometers they are not far from the creation of ICBMs.
  8. GAndr
    GAndr 9 September 2016 08: 53
    +3
    Something in the DPRK, in recent years, direct tangible progress. The new missiles they flew off well, here with the bomb progress on the face. I wonder why? Quantity has grown into quality?
    In other respects, I am happy for them, now only nuclear weapons are real protection from all kinds of "partners".
  9. Flinky
    Flinky 9 September 2016 08: 55
    +2
    Ten ct is already serious.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 9 September 2016 11: 13
      0
      According to the latest estimates of seismologists, the power of the device was in the range from 20 to 30 kilotons.
  10. gg.na
    gg.na 9 September 2016 09: 00
    +3
    The president said that “in close cooperation with the international community” she will “seek to toughen the sanctions” and will use “all means to make the DPRK abandon its nuclear ambitions”.

    Nothing that they will not achieve either by tightening or by any other means !!! bully Eun man good with an unbending character !!! WELL DONE good Eun !!! Keep it up!!! good
  11. erased
    erased 9 September 2016 09: 01
    +2
    It is a pity no one in 1945 could impose sanctions on the United States when they created their bomb. And now, having her, they impose sanctions on everyone who does not want to dance to their tune.
  12. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 9 September 2016 09: 11
    +1
    It seems they wrote about 30 kilotons.

    And what can the exceptional ones do? On sanctions, Koreans spit saliva; direct aggression is completely ruled out - because of just nuclear weapons, a certain inadequacy of the DPRK leadership and the presence of close China; no soft laughing there can be no power within the DPRK - all the "soft" ones were shot or imprisoned long ago.

    But in the Security Council - we’ll see what China and Russia say according to amerast resolutions. Russia especially, after the Paralympics there is no reason to support the initiative of these homocloons.
  13. UnclePasha
    UnclePasha 9 September 2016 09: 22
    +5
    It is scary when nuclear weapons are in the hands of fanatics ...
    1. dumpy15
      dumpy15 9 September 2016 09: 47
      +3
      The United States twice used atomic weapons. So far the only ones in the history of mankind. Nevertheless, they consider themselves the stronghold of democracy and progress.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 9 September 2016 11: 15
        0
        They, like us, used thermonuclear weapons in trials for 50 years.
        1. dumpy15
          dumpy15 9 September 2016 17: 48
          +1
          What are you talking about? Hiroshima and Nagasaki destroyed the USSR?
    2. padded jacket
      padded jacket 9 September 2016 09: 52
      +3
      Well, this is the expected development of this situation.
      First, the DPRK watched how they destroyed the USSR, then how they bombed Serbia, then how they bombed Afghanistan and occupied Iraq, then how they destroyed Libya, and then, as terrorists grown by the USA, the EU and the Israeli regime have been destroying Syria for five years and decided that we don’t need it.
      All Pyongyang's actions to create nuclear weapons and their means of delivery are just a response to the US policy, which seeks to comb all the countries of the world under its "democratic comb"
    3. adept666
      adept666 10 September 2016 11: 36
      0
      It is scary when nuclear weapons are in the hands of fanatics ...
      What kind of fanatics? They could have made a dirty bomb back in the mid-70s, they made an active one in the early 2000s (they have already owned technology for 13 years), but they haven’t destroyed anyone yet. And the fact that the United States throughout the post-war history has threatened the UK with nuclear weapons, how does it characterize them? And the fact that during the war of 50-53, the United States planned 7 megabatons for them to drop the UK fanatics too? And only after that, the UK began to seriously engage in nuclear weapons with the help of the USSR and China. Perhaps the seriously discussed US plan for the use of nuclear weapons in Vietnam does not characterize them as inadequate? During the war in Yugoslavia and Iraq, dirty bombs with depleted uranium were used (count also nuclear weapons). The main scumbags in the world just have delivery vehicles and nuclear weapons and I ask you to recall at least 5 plans for nuclear bombing of the USSR (the first of which was developed when we still did not have our own bomb or delivery vehicles). embarrassing?
  14. Lieutenant Teterin
    Lieutenant Teterin 9 September 2016 09: 47
    +7
    Savages. In order to show the presence of nuclear weapons, one test was enough - this will cool the ardor of the potential aggressor, and these tests create the image of the DPRK as an uncontractable state with unpredictable motivation and behavior patterns.
    1. adept666
      adept666 10 September 2016 11: 52
      0
      Savages. In order to show the presence of nuclear weapons, one test was enough - this will cool the ardor of the potential aggressor, and these tests create the image of the DPRK as an uncontractable state with unpredictable motivation and behavior patterns.
      Of course savages, where are they civilized to us? USA - 1054, USSR - 715, France - 200, Great Britain - 45, China - 45. Where are they with their 3-4 to the civilized laughing The nuclear weapons are simple only in theory, but in reality the task is not trivial, to create a full-fledged bomb, you need at least 5-6 full-scale tests in order to create a mathematical model and translate the research into a digital language for processing on supercomputers (which I think is not so in the UK too many wink )
  15. padded jacket
    padded jacket 9 September 2016 09: 58
    +4
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    And in North Korea, someone is going to attack?

    South Korea and the United States conducted exercises on the occupation of the DPRK
    The troops of South Korea and the United States held a joint exercise, during which they played the scenario of seizing the territory of the DPRK, the South Korean newspaper Dona Ilbo reported on Tuesday.
    The allies, who conducted the same exercises in 2010, made changes to them in order to increase the role of the South Korean army in the event of an "emergency in the North," the report said, Interfax reports.
    "For the first time, South Korea led all the operations that may be necessary to stabilize the situation in the DPRK, with US support," the newspaper quoted an unnamed military source.
    The exercises included the provision of humanitarian assistance to residents of the DPRK after occupying its territory and restoration of work
    administrative bodies
    Maneuvers to seize the DPRK and stabilize the situation in the north of the Korean Peninsula were carried out as part of the Ulchi Freedom Guard exercise in August of this year, in which tens of thousands of South Korean and American troops took part.
    http://globalconflict.ru/world-armies/5392-smi-yu
    zhnaya-koreya-i-ssha-proveli-ucheniya-po-okkupaci
    i-kndr
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 10: 22
      +2
      Quote: quilted jacket
      The newspaper quotes an unnamed military source.

      An expert, at least 15 years old?
  16. GEV67
    GEV67 9 September 2016 10: 05
    +2
    It's time for this merry fellow "U" to try a pill for his mind.
  17. akudr48
    akudr48 9 September 2016 10: 07
    +3
    The atomic bomb is the weapon of the poor, although the rich US has used it.

    Something like a great equalizer, a Colt pistol that makes people truly equal.
    .
    Negotiations with Colt in hand are better than just negotiations.

    Korea acts as it can.
  18. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 10: 22
    +3
    Alexander Romanov,

    Hiroshima and Nagasaki passed you by.
    Sanya, well, you don't seem to be an egeshnik, you have to distinguish a "conflict" from a stupid one-sided bombing, vigorous bombs. Or did Japan answer? -That's what I really missed ... request
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 10: 51
      +2
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      Sanya, well, you don't seem to be an egeshnik, you have to distinguish a "conflict" from a stupid one-sided bombing, vigorous bombs. Or did Japan answer?

      What is the difference? Will bamboo regime strike US? Do you believe that? North Korea, if necessary, will be ground to powder without any nuclear weapons in one day.
      1. Uncle Murzik
        Uncle Murzik 9 September 2016 12: 19
        +5
        Well, yes Vietnam has already been erased once! laughing
      2. Gradus HuK
        Gradus HuK 9 September 2016 23: 14
        +2
        Have already tried to wash. The Koreans are not Arabs! Exceptional rake on the most do not spoil!
  19. guzik007
    guzik007 9 September 2016 10: 30
    +3
    Even from the comments, as I understand it-2 \ 3, they are directly applauding the "pocket Fuhrer." What does the DPRK have, what can you fight for. Geopolitical position? Oil and gas reserves? What can you gain from the occupation? Thanks from China and Russia? Oh yes? "I forgot my partners in Seoul. Ha! Coconuts will strain for partners, of course.
    And he noticed that with both hands "for" those who, in the comments, are ardent enemies of their communists. Here is such a strange split in the heads.
    And Russia from such a neighbor, except for a headache, but for cheap labor, is nothing more.
    1. gray smeet
      gray smeet 9 September 2016 10: 51
      +2
      I already wrote that if S. Korea flashed a vigorous charge across the United States, our comrades would certainly have drunk with joy. That’s how they would shake Eun in his arms! And most importantly, I did not understand - do local false patriots consider North Korea our ally? wassat
    2. dumpy15
      dumpy15 9 September 2016 11: 07
      +3
      You ask rhetorical questions. Who is interested in tensions in the Korean Peninsula?
      Surely, neither China nor Russia. Who needs to occupy the DPRK and feed its population? Also nobody.
      But food for the North Koreans for many years tossed by the United States, which has in South Korea one of the largest combined arms groups abroad. Question: who does Kim work for?
    3. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2016 17: 06
      +3
      guzik007
      And Russia from such a neighbor, except for a headache, but cheap labor, is nothing more
      .Where did the Koreans in the slaves mantle? enlighten the illiterate ... wassat
  20. padded jacket
    padded jacket 9 September 2016 10: 32
    +2
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: quilted jacket
    The newspaper quotes an unnamed military source.

    An expert, at least 15 years old?

    Well, I don’t know, because you also consider yourself an expert in all topics. You write. You have a huge rating. How old are you? lol
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 9 September 2016 10: 54
      +2
      Quote: quilted jacket
      how old are you unknown

      Who need to know the.
      Quote: quilted jacket
      you have a huge rating

      Yes, the admin has attached you well to the racing drivers. You can say, right from the foot in your belly wassat
    2. Uncle Murzik
      Uncle Murzik 9 September 2016 18: 22
      +2
      yes novels ordinary liberalist!
  21. Diviz
    Diviz 9 September 2016 10: 51
    0
    Why is our intelligence silent. Our authorities will give an assessment. The DPRK is divorced from world affairs. Will China and Russia coordinate them? If, a special agent, an American journalist, teaches English, Kim Jong-un-Lisa will say the crow ...
  22. The comment was deleted.
    1. dumpy15
      dumpy15 9 September 2016 11: 11
      0
      I agree with you. Russia today has a balanced policy towards both Koreas, taking into account the DPRK’s proximity to the Far Eastern Federal District and our economic ties with Kazakhstan. But while the US is sitting in the South, Koreans will never reunite.
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 9 September 2016 11: 31
      0
      This missile defense, which is deployed in South Korea for neither Russia nor China, is not dangerous - since the range and height of the interception is 200 kilometers.
    3. Uncle Murzik
      Uncle Murzik 10 September 2016 10: 51
      0
      The United States rattles weapons around the world, and nothing! But what makes the DPRK worse
  23. Lavrenti Pavlovich
    Lavrenti Pavlovich 9 September 2016 11: 48
    +2
    The resilience of the DPRK deserves respect and admiration.
    1. gray smeet
      gray smeet 9 September 2016 11: 53
      +3
      Let it continue deserve we have respect and admiration, but without nuclear explosions! (Especially them service, someone brings to ecstasy!) We agree!
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. Salavatsky Ministry of Emergency Situations
    0
    Strangely, in the photo no one writes anything in a notebook, only they laugh amiably.
  26. Garris199
    Garris199 9 September 2016 13: 33
    0
    So they littered the planet with nuclear tests of the Cold War, so the Koreans continue to crap. Environmental consequences are bound to be.
  27. lis-ik
    lis-ik 9 September 2016 14: 28
    0
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    from adequate, their country is protected from "democracy". And in our country half of the government also smiles ... so what?
    1. lis-ik
      lis-ik 9 September 2016 14: 31
      +2
      Moreover, our government, in addition to stupid smiles and wishes for a pensioner, cannot even adequately and harshly respond to the scumbags who insult our disabled people and the country as a whole! It is difficult to imagine any greater humiliation, it remains only to add "Well, you hold on there ..."
  28. padded jacket
    padded jacket 9 September 2016 15: 04
    +1
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Who need to know the.

    And are these mostly Israeli Jews?
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Yes, the admin has attached you well to the racing drivers. You can say, right from the foot in the belly of wassat

    Especially you lol
    Quote: Vadim237
    They have an analogue of our BR R 27
    - she flies 3000 kilometers

    Yeah musudan called
  29. ankir13
    ankir13 9 September 2016 15: 35
    0
    Quote: gray smeet
    Yes Yes! On June 26, 1995, very heavy rains began in the country, and in some regions more than half a meter of rain fell in 10 days. In mid-August, the rain stopped, completely destroying the crop, and the total damage caused by the flood was estimated at $ 15 billion. According to North Korean data, 1,5 million tons of grain were lost, the fruiting layer on 330 thousand hectares of land was destroyed, and 5,4 million people lost their homes. Roads and power lines were damaged [12].

    From 1995 to 1999, famine continued in North Korea. Estimates of the death toll range from 220 thousand to 3,5 million ..........


    “The path to the revolution is long and thorny. Perhaps we will again have to feed the children with roots and grass, ”said the North Korean party newspaper Nodon Sinmun.
  30. miru mir
    miru mir 10 September 2016 10: 06
    0
    All in white! Horse him!
    Check it with a psychiatrist ...
    1. Uncle Murzik
      Uncle Murzik 10 September 2016 10: 53
      0
      What can Jews do not Koreans belay