How did the parasitic American empire

97
How did the parasitic American empire

240 years ago, 9 September 1776, the Continental Congress approved a new name for America: “United States of America” (instead of the name “United Colonies”, adopted by 7 Congress June 1775 of the year).

In the 1770, England’s conflict with its colonies in America took on open forms. By the spring of 1776, most of the American colonies were in favor of independence from the metropolis. As a result, a commission was formed to prepare the Declaration of Independence, and in July 1776, it was adopted at the Continental Congress. The declaration proclaimed the formation of 13 new sovereign states on the Atlantic coast of North America. From the beginning, these were separate, not federated states: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.



The Continental Congress, which took place in 1777, in Philadelphia, adopted a resolution establishing the appearance of the American flag, on which there were 13 white and red stripes, as well as 13 stars, in terms of the number of first united colonies. Later, it was decided to leave the number of bands unchanged forever, and to add one more star in honor of each new state.

The appearance of the United States

Over the 75 years after the first English colony of Virginia appeared in 1607, 12 colonies emerged: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia.

From the middle of the 17th century, England tried to establish complete control over the economy of the American colonies: all industrial goods (from metal buttons to fishing vessels) were imported by colonies from the metropolis in exchange for raw materials and agricultural goods. The English businessmen and the English government were extremely not interested in the development of industry in the colonies, as well as in the trade of the colonies with anyone other than the metropolis. In turn, the American industry (mainly in the northern colonies) achieved serious success. Especially American industrialists succeeded in building ships, which allowed them to quickly establish trade with the West Indies and thereby find a market for the domestic industry. Thus, the economic prerequisite for the conflict between the metropolis and the colonies, the British and American elite, appeared. The constant pressure of England, when the metropolis tried to put the entire foreign trade of the colonies under its control, as well as duties and tax on goods, annoyed the Americans. The American elite began to lean towards creating an autonomous state entity. So, at 1754, on the initiative of Benjamin Franklin, a project was launched to create a union of North American colonies with its own government, but led by a president appointed by the British monarch. However, in London they did not want to make concessions, so the question of complete independence was gradually raised.

As a result, the American Revolution began. The reason was the "Boston Tea Party" 16 December 1773 of the year - a protest action of American colonists as a result of which in the Boston harbor was destroyed a cargo of tea belonging to the British East India Company. The colonists protested against the "Tea Law". The British government took the most decisive steps to pacify the rebels. The port was blocked until the city authorities paid compensation for the destroyed cargo. But the punitive action against Boston not only did not pacify the rebels, but also served as a pretext for all American colonies to begin protests and rally for the struggle for independence.

September 5 The First Continental Congress began its work in Philadelphia, which formulated the requirements for the metropolis. The Declaration of Rights developed by Congress contained a statement on the rights of the American colonies to “life, freedom and property”, and the Continental Association’s document produced at the same congress authorized the resumption of a boycott of British goods in the event of London’s refusal to make concessions in its financial and economic policy . In response, the English king demanded the complete subordination of the colonies of British power. The British fleet launched a blockade of the northeast coast of the Americas. General Gage was ordered to suppress the "open rebellion" and ensure that the colonies enforced the repressive laws, resorting to the use of force if necessary. Thus, the confrontation began, a compromise could not be found.

In the spring of 1775, the US War of Independence began. The first general self-government body, the Continental Congress, was created on the eve of the revolution as a meeting of representatives of individual colonies. At the Second Continental Congress, convened by 10 in May 1775, taking into account the harsh actions of the British government and British troops, who actually began fighting against colonist militia units by that time, Congress declared itself the central government of the colonies. Congress instructed the colonial legislatures to work out local constitutions providing for their independence from England. General Washington, a prominent political leader from Virginia, was appointed commander-in-chief of the unified Continental Army.

In July, 1776. Congress voted to proclaim US independence and adopted the Declaration of Independence, which formed the basis of the constitution of a new federal state. 9 September 1776 of the Year Continental Congress approved the new name of America - "United States of America" ​​(instead of the name "United Colonies", adopted by the Congress of 7 June 1775 of the year).

Parasitic public education. Project "New Babylon"

Russia is a natural state. It was created by the state-forming people, the Rus-Russians, while the Rus have lived for thousands of years on their territory (from the times of Great Scythia, the Aryans and the legendary Hyperborea) and created a unique Russian civilization with the natural inclusion of neighboring lands and peoples in the zone of their state (imperial) construction. That is, Russia is a natural state and a people-civilization. For example, the same are Japan or China.

The United States of America is, in fact, the “New Babylon”, an unnatural, parasitic state entity created by families, groups, clans and gangs of migrants of different ethnic, religious and social origin. And on the bones and blood of the local indigenous population - the Indians, as well as imported slaves. The lands of America were conquered by deceit, bribery and force. The indigenous population was subjected to genocide - with the help of contagious diseases, from which the Indians, having no immunity, died out. “Firewater”, so moonshine became more efficient weaponsthan a gun, because it killed entire generations, led to their degeneration, degradation. Bleed the tribes among themselves. And the apparent strength, when the colonists became many and they were able to dictate their conditions to the natives, driving them to barren, deserted lands (reservations), condemning them to slow and painful extinction and killing those who had the courage to resist. It was then that a terrible proverb was born: "A good Indian is a dead Indian."

In America, gangs of migrants, expelled and fugitive criminals, seekers of profit, gold, adventurers and religious fanatical radicals, who were ready to deceive and kill, seize foreign lands, rushed to America, mercilessly destroying, expelling and enslaving the natives who were not considered people at all.

Interestingly, in the first stage, the Dutch and English religious fanatics (“pilgrim fathers”), escaped and deported criminals, adventurers arrived in America in a very poor condition - their ships needed major repairs, they starved, were sick, did not know the local conditions, and could barely catch on the new mainland. Local warlike and numerous Indian tribes could easily smash and throw the first wave of colonists into the sea. But the Indians (remembering Pocahontas) did the opposite - they helped strangers, helped build dwellings, taught them to get food, and supported the settlers in every way. As a result, the colonists were given a foothold, settle down, wait for reinforcements. And soon they moved on to the planned genocide of their Indian benefactors. The natives were poisoned cynically, with fanaticism and sadism, like mad beasts. It was white bounty hunters who taught Indian soldiers to collect scalps when the British and French fought for dominance on the continent. Initially, for example, in New England, the legislature set the price for an Indian scalp to 50 pounds. Whether male, female or childish. Anyway - 50 pounds. Brought the scalp of a woman, her children - and you have a seed capital, you are a wealthy person. Thus, the most brutal murders were encouraged from above, by law. There were whole brigade "bounty hunters." Massacres were massive. He brought a bag of ears to the local authorities and get the money (it is clear that the price later fell to 3-5 dollars).

The hunt for the Indians was quite a normal business. It must be remembered that mostly Protestants came to North America. For them, the Indians were not people in our understanding. Indians were considered semi-intelligent beasts, so the generally accepted standards of morality did not apply to them. Thus, the Americans exterminated hundreds of thousands, millions of Native Americans.

Often, Indians were killed and driven into the depths of the continent, into barren wastelands, legally competently, on the basis of those “treaties” under which the aborigines “sold” their lands without understanding their meaning at all. These "treaties" allowed not only private settlers to destroy and drive out the Indians from their lands, but also the professional army to exterminate them on "legitimate" grounds. Only a large number of Indian tribes allowed them to avoid total destruction. A small part of the natives (about one percent) survived on reservations. Aboriginal slaughtered, buried in the bud, descendants of once free and powerful tribes, warriors and farmers were driven into reservations for exotic things to entertain locals and tourists.

It is worth noting that this passion for the "treaties" has remained with the Anglo-Saxons so far. So, it is the “Minsk and Norman” formats that allow the West to continue to dominate the lands of the Russian civilization - in Little Russia, Southern Russia, one of the indigenous lands of the Russian super-ethnos. Unfortunately, now in the role of Aboriginal-natives, we already. And we are driven away and exterminated from our ancestral lands, entangled with unequal agreements, turned into ethnographic ballast with brainwashed. Although Kiev, Lviv, Odessa, Transnistria, Poltava, Chernihiv, Kharkov, Pereyaslavl-Russian are our native Russian cities and lands. And the Little Russians (southern Russian-Russians) and the Great Russian Russians are one people, the superethnos of the Rus.

Also, black and white slaves came to America - contracted "servants", in fact, slaves - disenfranchised Irish, Scots, Germans, Slavs, Scandinavians, etc. This is a little popular, but documentary fact. They began to be delivered even before the final solution of the “Indian question”, since labor was needed. The parasite predators themselves did not want to work. Supply blacks just getting better. The raids on the Indians could not solve this problem, since the freedom-loving Indians preferred death to slavery, in captivity they quickly fell ill and died. Therefore, they invented the import of white slaves. They were recruited by hook or by crook in Europe and shipped overseas, selling to English, Dutch parasite owners. Many white slaves died on the road, but those who survived brought enormous profits to the slave traders (one of the articles of the so-called “primitive accumulation of capital”). In this case, the owners tried to propagate the slaves. If blacks were imported mostly by men, since women simply could not stand the terrible road in which up to half and more slaves were initially loaded. That among the white slaves there were many women. Therefore, the owners were engaged in "crossing" to increase the population of slaves.

Thus, in America, a terrible hierarchy of predators, parasites, and preys was initially formed. Upstairs - white gentlemen, Anglo-Saxon landowners, planters, shipowners, usurers, bankers, large speculators, and lawyers serving them. They control military force - unprincipled, ready for everything for gold, gangster fighters who destroy the Indians and keep under control the main rightless mass of white and black slaves. Plus a layer of semi-free farmers, hunters who are small predators, parasitizing on the lands of the Indians. However, they are kept under control with the help of laws, lawyers, driving into bondage to larger predators.

On the basis of slave labor - white and black, the masters of America began to create industry. Moreover, while in the North, mainly white slaves used slave labor, then black slaves were imported to the South, who were used in more primitive agriculture. Thus, initially the American economy and the majority of usury-banking "houses" and companies stand on the blood and bones of black and white slaves. Millions of people were exterminated, sold into slavery, and perished in inhuman conditions so that America would receive the foundation of its future prosperity. This is not customary to say, but the slave trade and the brutal extermination of Indian peoples became the basis of "free" America. Without the ruthless exploitation of slaves, the clans of American parasite predators could not exist and get rich. In general, the essence of Western civilization is slavery, the parasitism of a small stratum of the “chosen” on slaves, even if at present the chains have become invisible.

Legally, the States arose when the English and American clans of parasite predators quarreled over money. The American clans wanted the metropolis to moderate their appetites. And London did not want to reckon with the interests of the colonies. When the colonies began to put demands, England began an economic war, threatening with military force. Thirteen English colonies quickly united in front of a common threat. England tried to restore order in the colonies by force. In fact, it was a war because of the bickering inside the Anglo-Saxon project (one of the leading projects of the broader Western project). The fight for the right to assign the fruits of labor of others. Younger, American parasite clans opposed the “mother island”.

It is understood that the American colonies, without a strong industry, a professional army and fleetwere doomed to defeat. England and crushed such opponents. However, higher levels of the Western project entered the Big Game - Masons, owners of Protestant false churches and the Vatican. Separatists led by Freemason D. Washington. It is not for nothing that the United States is simply imbued with the Masonic spirit and symbolism. America, according to their plan, was to become the new “command post” of the West, the “New Rome” and at the same time the “New Babylon”. Therefore, the American colonies supported France and Spain. Then a strategic mistake was made, or rather, it was "helped" by Russia, which took a benevolent position with respect to the United States. And in 1780, Russia headed the so-called. The Neutral League is an association of states that opposed Britain’s intention to oppose trade between its adversaries and countries that did not participate in the conflict. That is, in fact, an anti-British bloc was created, led by Russia. So, Russia helped the birth of the United States. England had to release the overseas colonies from its steel claws and yield to the pressure of the “world community”.

As a result, a terrible predator-alien, ghoul-state appeared on the planet, which can live only due to the sucking of blood resources from humanity, from the whole of our planet. The formation of the American parasitic empire began. In general, the British Empire was created according to the same concept, but the USA surpassed the metropolis in this matter, becoming the embodiment of the parasitic, anti-human essence of Western civilization.

The cancer grew rapidly. The first 13 states immediately began to plunder and occupy neighboring lands. First, the lands of Indian tribes were hit. 1792 to 1803 Americans knocked out or kicked out almost all the Indians on their lands in the future states of Ohio, Tennessee and Kentucky. In 1803, the States forced France, which was in a difficult situation, fighting with almost all of Europe, to “sell” huge Louisiana for a pittance. Almost for nothing the Americans got a huge land and its wealth. In 1810, Americans are leaking from West Florida, which belonged to Spain, and captured it. In 1812, the Americans tried to bite off the territory of England - they encroached on the huge Canada. But, the regular English army trashes American gangs and they run. Canada remained in the sphere of influence of the British Empire. In 1819, Americans capture East Florida. On the peninsula, Americans arrange genocide of the Indian people seminoles. The genocide of the Indians in the occupied territory continues steadily and in full swing, without distracting attention from the seizure of new lands.

In 1823, the Monroe Doctrine was proclaimed. The Americans announced that only they had the right to occupy and seize all the lands of the Western Hemisphere. At the same time, this cynical doctrine, which showed the right of the strong, was disguised by the "humane and democratic" ideas of protecting America from "external interference". The United States untied its hands and showed the whole world that they are above the laws and morals, that the States assume the role of ruler of the entire Western Hemisphere.

Already in 1824, the Americans landed troops in Cuba. The appetites of the American beast are growing. This beast is greedy and merciless. Not in vain in Russia A.S. Pushkin notes: “For some time the North American States have been drawing attention to themselves in Europe ... They saw democracy in its abominable cynicism, in its cruel prejudices, in its intolerable tyranny.”

In 1845, the Americans capture Texas, part of Mexico, which recently achieved independence from Spain. Capture of Texas was presented as “voluntary adherence”. In 1846, the United States provoked a war with Mexico and took almost half of its territory — New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, California, etc. In the future, America continued its expansion, where by force, under new agreement, lands: Hawaii, Alaska, Guam, Puerto Rico, Philippines, Cuba, etc.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

97 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    9 September 2016 06: 04
    parasites must be poisoned with dust! laughing
    1. +12
      9 September 2016 07: 23
      19th Indians photo







      http://mishawalk.blogspot.ru/2015/08/19.html

      if in the 19th century the Indians still looked like white people, then what happened in the century18, whom did the European civilizers destroy?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +8
        9 September 2016 12: 03
        I advise everyone to download a good book
        "My people Sioux" of the Indian chief of the time
        Mato Najin. I read it back in Soviet times.
        1. +8
          9 September 2016 15: 22
          Columbus discovered America-Spain, Portugal, England and other robbers were grateful to him, if there is someone who will close the hell with America, the whole world will be grateful to him.
        2. +6
          9 September 2016 15: 22
          Columbus discovered America-Spain, Portugal, England and other robbers were grateful to him, if there is someone who will close the hell with America, the whole world will be grateful to him. fellow
        3. +6
          9 September 2016 15: 23
          Columbus discovered America-Spain, Portugal, England and other robbers were grateful to him, if there is someone who will close the hell with America, the whole world will be grateful to him. fellow
    2. +11
      9 September 2016 09: 10
      Uncle Murzik Today, 06:04 AM New
      parasites must be poisoned with dust! laughing


      You won’t take these dusts, either sarin or radioactive ash!
    3. +3
      9 September 2016 14: 43
      Russia is a natural state and a civilization nation. For example, Japan or China are the same.


      about Russia -Rusi so, but about whether Japan or China are unlikely to be natural. Endemic aborigines of the Japanese islands are the Ainu people, which the Japanese destroyed, like the American Indians. As for China, the Chinese are still afraid to show their pyramids or tombs, because there is everywhere the burial of white people.
      1. 0
        3 November 2016 15: 19
        The Japanese are certainly not endemic. I agree about the Ainu. Plus, the Chinese themselves consider the Japanese to be the descendants of fugitive Chinese garbage. The "indigenous" Chinese themselves are Taoists, and historically there were no feet north of Huang He. Over the past 2 thousand years, or even less, northern China has corrected its genetics.
  2. +7
    9 September 2016 06: 24
    Samsonov correctly wrote everything.
    US parasites. And Russia at one time helped the Americans
    1. +2
      9 September 2016 10: 55
      so the British were the same parasites - the British Empire brazenly exploited half the globe. so there were no good ones
  3. +11
    9 September 2016 06: 50
    In general, the essence of Western civilization is slavery, the parasitism of a few strata of the “chosen” on slaves, even if the chains have now become invisible.

    I will add: The very concept of "democracy" (it sounds better - demoncracy) arose in ancient Greece (Elada) under the conditions of a slave system. And an insignificant stratum of the then society - "demos" - is simply the slave owners themselves. Hence, we can conclude that "democracy" is a form of collective government of the slave-owning class. By the way, in the USA the very constitution and organization of the newly formed state were also created by slave owners. For example: George Washington was a large slave owner, had no less than 200 - 300 slaves, other "founding fathers" did not lag behind him in relation to slavery. This is where the indirect and non-universal suffrage arose, when "slaves" choose electors, and they finally elect the president himself.
    1. +3
      9 September 2016 11: 57
      A very comprehensive and accessible explanation of the Amerian electoral system. Many do not know and believe that the president is elected by the people.
      And in addition, a quote from the classics:
      "... The one with the shovel, long and monotonously outlined the foundations of the political structure of a beautiful country, of which he was a citizen. The device was unusually democratic, and there could be no question of any coercion of citizens (he emphasized this several times with particular emphasis) , everyone was rich and free from worries, and even the very last farmer had at least three slaves ... "
      (c) Monday begins on Saturday.
  4. +2
    9 September 2016 07: 12
    As a result, a terrible predator, a stranger, a ghoul state appeared on the planet, which can only live by sucking out blood resources from humanity, from all over our planet \\\\\\\\\\
    Interesting idea! It’s that they silently wrote an autobiographical film, Alien, it came out, but I didn’t know.
  5. +4
    9 September 2016 07: 34
    Carthage must be destroyed ...
    1. +5
      9 September 2016 12: 00
      It somehow does not suit you to be included in such a "coven of witches"
      It seems like a person studying history ... request
      1. +2
        9 September 2016 19: 34
        voyaka uh...As a student of history ... even from Soviet books ... laughing .. To this, everything goes ... to the destruction of Carthage ... It will happen .. not tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, and not in 10 years .. There are many factors ... The main American political establishment is smaller .. G. Truman is a giant compared to today ... Remember the Soviet joke .. Brezhnev, falls into the 21st century .. enters the book store takes a political dictionary and reads Brezhnev, a minor politician from the times of ABBA, Bonnie M and Alla Pugacheva .... The same can be said about American politicians .. It will be like in a song .. That's all there isn’t Bill. Bill’s greed has destroyed ..
        1. +5
          9 September 2016 20: 51
          Carthage - a small city-state of the Phoenicians
          was completely physically destroyed by Rome in the 3rd
          Punic war. The USA is a country of 325 million people
          occupying an entire continent. If you call
          "Destruction of Carthage" relative decline
          US influence in the world, then this will undoubtedly happen.
          A new giant is growing - China, which is inevitable
          will squeeze the USA.
          Regarding Presidents: Most Presidents
          USA were minor types, which immediately
          forgot. America is ruled by Congress, which is constantly updated, and no one remembers the names either
          after they leave. America is a kind of "anonymous" machine,
          based on horizontal control.
          1. +1
            9 September 2016 23: 29
            Carthage - a small city-state of the Phoenicians

            Carthage - a state that has a huge income from
            Mediterranean trade. There were huge
            money, Rome was not standing there. Originally war with
            Rome was something secondary. Therefore, she was not given due attention. Colonies of Carthage were scattered throughout the coast. The possessions of Rome at that time were mainly limited to the territory directly of Italy.
  6. PKK
    +5
    9 September 2016 07: 35
    In 1812, there was the War of the River Routes from New York, further west to Chicago, canals were built. And then it began. They built the Chicago massacres through which 70 million heads of cattle, bison, 30 million horses, and how many millions of sheep and no one knows the goats. This is only what came to the slaughter, and how many were just shot for fun in the Prairies. So that the cattle in the films about cowboys are not grown, but collected on the endless Prairies. In those days, cowboys earned, but almost everything was lowered.
    After the introduction of refrigerators, the Slaughterhouse railroad earned year-round. The sight is not for the faint of heart.
    Smallpox poisoned the natives, but there is a moment, without immunity you can’t use bio weapons, you will bend yourself.
    Therefore, they had previously learned how to vaccinate against smallpox. The whole elite of the Oldenburgs, the guards and performers were vaccinated. In Russia, the same picture was vaccinated by Ekaterina2ya and her people.
    The Indians gave the colonists horses, and the Prairies gave cattle. All this went on sale to Europe.
    Money floated into pockets not just a river but a Niagara Falls.
    After the abolition of slavery, all the slaves were expelled. And only healthy Negroes were returned to work. Children, the elderly, the sick remained overboard, for independent living.
    All these tricks go beyond human.
    1. +1
      9 September 2016 08: 39
      Smallpox poisoned the natives, but there is a moment, without immunity you can’t use bio weapons, you will bend yourself.

      For a minute, the smallpox poisoners themselves could
      poison and rest in the Bose. General vaccination
      only the 1960s was held in the USSR. Then one lover
      Pupuasov brought to Moscow smallpox from India In the United States, this
      centrally just do not do.
      1. 0
        9 September 2016 10: 56
        By the way, the British were engaged in smallpox
        1. 0
          9 September 2016 11: 27
          Smallpox?
          And not the Spaniards, in the era of Pissarro and Montezuma? The expansion of the British was then in its infancy. But is there any confirmation to that ...
          1. 0
            9 September 2016 11: 50
            Biological weapons appeared in the United States even before the states themselves appeared. Its inventor is the British general Jeffrey Amherst, who proposed using smallpox infected blankets against the Indians who rebelled in 1763.

            Officially, like this, there are many confirmations, I haven’t heard anything about the Spaniards hi
      2. +3
        9 September 2016 13: 13
        Then one lover of Pupuasas brought smallpox to India from Moscow

        A feature film was even shot about it, seen in childhood.
        Only the heroine was a woman and came from Africa.
  7. +7
    9 September 2016 08: 03
    The fact that there are articles about the United States without any embellishment and lies is wonderful, the next step should be a tribunal for the colonialists and genocide of indigenous peoples. Europeans are proud of the slogans, but they are silent about the fact that they destroyed the population in the colonies, and about the * good colonizers * they write romances. The truth about the colonialists is so unsightly that it’s impossible to hide, that’s where literature and * kin * about how * civilized * savages and taught, and they * bloomed and smelled * of gratitude.
    Today, the teachings and moralizing of Europeans are going beyond all reasonable limits, and it is very unfortunate that in RUSSIA there are scoundrels who defend the interests of the West, and there is no council for them, they will not even let the cops in the face.
  8. +2
    9 September 2016 08: 17
    Since those distant times, little has changed in their politics, both internal and external.
  9. +1
    9 September 2016 08: 28
    If you open an old time-tested textbook on the history of the USSR, you could read in black and white there: "Before the 1917 revolution, the United States was the most democratic state in the world." And then, of course, the USSR became the freest country. But before that there was the United States. Was history taught badly at school?
    1. +7
      9 September 2016 09: 00
      By the way, they created both states, that the USA, that the USSR, representatives of ONE people. Look at the names and surnames and everything will become clear.
    2. +13
      9 September 2016 10: 13
      If you open an old time-tested textbook on the history of the USSR, you could read in black and white there: "Before the 1917 revolution, the United States was the most democratic state in the world." And then, of course, the USSR became the freest country. But before that there was the United States. Was history taught badly at school?


      In my opinion, you are lying to put it mildly, taking advantage of the fact that your words are almost impossible to verify! Firstly, not all of them have old textbooks on the history of the USSR. And secondly, who will reread the entire textbook in search of confirmation of your words ?! If you refer to a textbook on the history of the USSR, then you must indicate the edition of the textbook, the year of publication, the page and paragraph where it is written! And then what does the history of the USSR have to do with "democracy" in the United States ?! So you lie like Trotsky!
      1. +1
        9 September 2016 10: 16
        Well, Hapfrey doesn’t lie in the first! one word dreamer
      2. +1
        9 September 2016 11: 40
        Diana, read the Soviet history textbook, do not reread it all
        necessary, although it would be useful for you, it is worth reading the chapter on the February Revolution. So that you know the history textbook for the 10th grade was then one. Take any, even for the 75th, even for the 80th, years. Everything is known in comparison. If somewhere is bad, then you need to see where it was good. And here it turns out that the country is freer, naturally, before the USSR appeared in the world, it was not. In Russia at that time Saltychikha tortured 130 people without any smallpox
        Trotsky, by the way, was the creator of the Red Army and the technical leader
        October Revolution (this is a Bolshevik term)
        1. +4
          9 September 2016 13: 43
          Trotsky, by the way, was the creator of the Red Army and the technical leader of the October Revolution
          Trotsky did not collect anyone and 23.02.1917/XNUMX/XNUMX with this horde suffered a crushing defeat, although we were told the opposite to the Soviet school.
          The regular Red Army was created by Tsarist General Kamenev.
          Trotsky and Sverlov were agents of the influence of the arrogant Saxons. Today’s Trotsky is more likely oral, it’s only very small.
      3. +1
        9 September 2016 11: 40
        Actually, you need to learn from the Americans. Learning to work, learning about the old and the disabled
        1. +3
          9 September 2016 13: 44
          Learning to work, learning about the old and the disabled
          Especially the blacks, yes Hapfrey?
          1. +7
            9 September 2016 14: 31
            Especially the blacks, yes Hapfrey?

            Not only blacks, there are many others there, the same Indians or Latinos. They are so "equal" Americans that they still live in separate quarters, where the entrance to representatives of another race threatens to break the skull with a bat! And they are also treated in special hospitals, such as hospices, where no white American will ever go for treatment, just as no Negro or Latinos will go to a hospital for whites. America is a country of "equal" opportunities, just some are LITTLE EQUIRED than others!

            And where does such "khapfrov" come from ?! They do not sit in his Brighton Beach, everyone in Russia is crying, all the poor fellows "care" about her, their **** are corrupt ...
          2. +1
            9 September 2016 16: 33
            Learning to work, learning about the old and the disabled
            Especially the blacks, yes Hapfrey?

            In the sense of African-Americans. Them too. Lots of
            there is one that needs to be adopted from them.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. +2
              9 September 2016 20: 04
              If you shoved you somewhere in Brooklyn, Bronsk, or Harlem, you would immediately have changed your attitude towards these Negro parasites, you are our tolerant.
          3. +1
            9 September 2016 16: 33
            And where does such "khapfrov" come from ?! They do not sit in his Brighton Beach, everyone in Russia is crying, all the poor fellows "care" about her, their **** are corrupt ...

            To say the right words does not mean to love the Motherland.
            Who do you love? And nobody. Your government is not like that
            officials are crooks, businessmen are crooks, and your ideal of a fair society is closest to the Kimov regime of
            S. Koreans, poor but proud, I don’t want such a future for my Motherland.
            1. +6
              9 September 2016 17: 27
              I don’t want such a future for my Motherland.


              It remains to find out only one question: and where is your homeland "sonny" ?! Do not you teach me how to love your homeland! Unlike you, I do not glorify the enemies of my homeland, so do not stain with my dirty American little hands, my love for my homeland is RUSSIA!
              1. 0
                9 September 2016 23: 45
                dirty American little hands, my love for my homeland - RUSSIA!

                You are funny. You speak directly with slogans from the newspaper Pravda. Diana, the era of rallies, where the hirelings of imperialism were branded are far in the past. Nothing came of it. No matter how you struggled for 70 years,
                but they didn’t build communism. So do not strain. Your Homeland is not Russia, but the USSR, and the World International. You don’t pretend.
      4. +2
        9 September 2016 11: 41
        Look what kind of medicine, science in the States, how industrial production works, what social guarantees.
        So there’s nothing to write nonsense
        1. +14
          9 September 2016 12: 01
          Look what kind of medicine, science in the States, how industrial production works, what social guarantees.
          So there’s nothing to write nonsense


          Exactly, there’s nothing to write NORDS! What are social guarantees ?! Do you know how much health insurance costs ?! Are you aware that there is no free education there ?! Do you know how many families were left without housing on the street after the banking crisis, when most were simply not able to pay the mortgage ?! So you write nonsense, you are our unfinished mattress pad!
          1. +1
            9 September 2016 17: 13
            What are social guarantees ?! Do you know how much health insurance costs ?! Are you aware that there is no free education there ?! Do you know how many families were left without housing on the street after the banking crisis, when most were simply not able to pay the mortgage ?!

            Silent would be better, for the clever used gone.
            What guarantees do we have? And what salaries especially in the province?
            And in science? Are you aware that many of us simply cannot
            imagine a mortgage because of the miserable standard of living.
            Do you seriously think that in our universities education
            is free? There are none left. Yes, and work can be found with great difficulty. How many get there
            educators? 15 000? 200 $? Well, a good teacher will work for himself. As Medvedev said. With medicine full of seams. We collect sick children with the whole world, with the involvement of newspapers and TV, so that later
            in the same america do operation
          2. +1
            9 September 2016 23: 45
            Diana, I recommend that you end each of your comments with a quote: "Carthage (Washington) must be destroyed.")))
            1. +6
              10 September 2016 02: 08
              Diana, I recommend

              I forgot to ask you what thoughts to express to me! Sorry yours, doodle-with yours, correct-s, do not be so kind as to worry ...
              1. 0
                13 September 2016 14: 50
                Nothing, the lady is excusable to forget and get confused.
                By the way, I'm not "yours", so far only "your honor".)))
        2. +4
          9 September 2016 13: 48
          Look what kind of medicine in the States
          One colleague once brought pictures of the failures of our American colleagues, which he scored on duty at the university clinic of the once leading industrial center of the FSA. I was particularly struck by the case of an elderly white man whose treatment for a commonplace fracture (in any CRH or trauma center was healed with plaster in 3 months) ended in 5 operations over 3 years (including with microsurgical technique, then elimination of a cosmetic defect) and disability.
          1. 0
            9 September 2016 15: 08
            Quote: Balu
            any central hospital or training center will cure

            What is the treatment method at a similar point, simplicity?))
          2. 0
            9 September 2016 16: 53
            One colleague writes prescriptions for non-existent diseases, the level of knowledge in ophthalmology is simply terrifying,
            diplomas seem to be bought in a subway passage. Person
            without medical education explains to the doctor how he should
            treat which methods and equipment to use. It's here
            with us, not Brighton
          3. +1
            9 September 2016 16: 53
            One colleague writes prescriptions for non-existent diseases, the level of knowledge in ophthalmology is simply terrifying,
            diplomas seem to be bought in a subway passage. Person
            without medical education explains to the doctor how he should
            treat which methods and equipment to use. It's here
            with us, not Brighton
            1. 0
              12 September 2016 23: 10
              Hapfri One colleague writes prescriptions for non-existent diseases, the level of knowledge in ophthalmology is simply terrifying,
              diplomas seem to be bought in a subway passage. Person
              without medical education explains to the doctor how he should
              treat which methods and equipment to use. It's here
              with us, not Brighton

              This is exactly what you have on Brighton. Even before perestroika, there was an article in the literature by an emigrant who compared American and Soviet medicine. Two examples were remembered: acute cholecystitis with a stone. For a week the poor fellow from one to another American doctor, a bunch of tests, until he went to the doctor-emigrant from the USSR. He made the correct diagnosis without any ultrasound, sent for surgery.
              The second example with coronary artery bypass grafting. At that time, these operations were far from being carried out in every regional center as now. What impressed me the most at the time was the manufacturability of how he described the postoperative period. Alas, we do not have it now.
              Recipe scandals and insurance fraud are just about your Bright Beach or where you live. Hapfri Hahaha.
  10. +3
    9 September 2016 08: 49
    And Hercules, according to the pearls of the "true Aryan" Samsonov, Russian or Russian?
    Historical articles about the war, taken from Soviet propaganda materials, can still be read somehow, but as soon as he begins to analyze geopolitical processes, and give his superficial conjectures as truth ...! Well, in other matters, to amuse the "greatness" and "antiquity", I would say "prehistoric" of the local Aryans will go.
    1. +12
      9 September 2016 10: 22
      And Hercules, according to the pearls of the "true Aryan" Samsonov, Russian or Russian?


      And what exactly do you disagree with the author? That there was no colonization of America, there were no white and black slaves, there was no genocide of Indians ?! What's wrong with the words of the author ?! And where are the "true Aryans" ?! You have a mess in your head, horses, people are mixed in a heap. Samsonov did not write about the Aryans, the Rus, and what else are you blaming him for. And your desire to "denounce" and "incriminate" the author of what he did not write, only says that the truth about your American masters hurts, am I wrong ?!
      1. +1
        9 September 2016 14: 05
        Quote: Samsonov
        It was created by the state-forming people - Russian-Russians, while the Russians have lived on their territory for thousands of years (from the times of Great Scythia, the Aryans and the legendary Hyperborea)
      2. 0
        9 September 2016 15: 14
        ... about your American masters ...
        Well this is without comment ..))
        The article had to be read by Diana ... Such sectarian behavior, I mean the manifestation of aggression in defense of the leader, the American owners, just the same, are convenient in using such inattentive and blindly trusting individuals.
        1. +6
          9 September 2016 15: 22
          The article had to be read by Diana ... Otherwise, such inattentive and blindly trusting individuals are just convenient for the American owners to use.

          I just read the article carefully and agree with the author 100 percent. At the expense of the credulity, it’s not for me, it’s for American worshipers, it’s your eyes covered with a dollar veil!
          1. 0
            9 September 2016 15: 33
            [quote = Diana Ilyina] Samsonov did not write about the Aryans [/ quote]
            these are your words.
            [quote = Diana Ilyina] I just read the article carefully [/ quote]
            If I read, I would see it
            [quote = Samsonov] It was created by the state-forming people - Russian-Russians, while the Russians have lived on their territory for thousands of years (from the times of Great Scythia, the Aryans and the legendary Hyperborea) [/ quote] [/ quote]
            [quote = Diana Ilyina] your eyes are covered with a dollar shroud! [/ quote] wink
            1. +8
              9 September 2016 15: 53
              Samsonov did not write about the Aryans

              Once again, for those who are on an armored train! The article is not about where and how the Slavs-Russians lived, but about the formation of the USA as a parasitic state. The author mentions Rusov only in passing to show the difference between the formation of the people as a state-forming pillar. If this is a discovery for you, then it’s worth doing self-education once you haven’t finished your studies at school.
  11. +1
    9 September 2016 10: 17
    Put on the Americans. More precisely on their elite.
    Uhhhhh ... no, the first sentence - or rather.
    It hurts me for something else. For power.
    There was once Muscovy. Well, it began with the principality of Moscow (without going into subtleties), it went, went, went, once - it turned into the Russian kingdom. Further more, the compatriots picked up.
    Alternative statehood - also Rus, Slavs, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Poland and Russia - was dealt with.
    And from the Baltic to the Pacific, territories were mastered.
    The people lived in those territories and still live. Any Chukchi and Nganasans with Nivkhs are also not averse to "pawning by the collar." And even to death, as they say. But they still live. There are such peoples.
    But Russia-both feverish and feverish. Not diarrhea, so scrofula.
    If we assume that the USSR was created by "the same people" as America - then how hard did it collapse, the Union? Or because the 5th column was considered too closely? Allowed free travel to Israel - the people tore. There. It’s good if there were at least half of the Jews there. And if they had not allowed it, would the Union have remained in its place?
    By the way, evaluate now who is at the helm - and again the same column. 5th ... in the Soviet nomination.
    So ... some kind of riddle ... with Russia.
    ...
    How to find out why we all living in Russia all together. continually fate throws trials?
    Who is to blame and what to do?
    ...
    ...
    PS. Under Ivan the Terrible, they also fought against the "heresy of the Judaizers." It is unknown tokmo whether they overcame. And the state took place.
    So, I think, that’s not what we are looking for.
    1. +1
      9 September 2016 15: 29
      ... Was once Muscovy ...
      It never happened. There was a Moscow principality. and "Muscovites" and "Muscovy" are terms coined by the Lyakhs.
  12. +2
    9 September 2016 10: 39
    Hmm, as soon as the site was updated - they began to post such a blizzard, it was already disgusting to read.
  13. +1
    9 September 2016 11: 30
    I like this article! The author told everything, forgot about the main thing, although he posted an entertaining drawing at the beginning. What kind of image? A drunken Anglo-Saxon sailor?
    But he would open the topic of the image in more detail, there would be not the text of a first grader, but the answer to the title of the article.
  14. +4
    9 September 2016 11: 52
    "The American lands were invaded by deception, bribery and force. The indigenous population was subjected to genocide."

    And these people forbid us to pick our nose !!!

    By reading the facts presented in this article, all the speeches of Russian representatives at all international platforms and forums should begin. Plus, the requirement of recognition of the fact of the US genocide against indigenous people and blacks, as well as the payment of compensation to Mexico for the seized territories.
    Anglo-Saxons are the most depraved, thieves and cruelest nation on the planet, only the absolute can not notice it. The author is a huge plus and thanks.
    1. +1
      9 September 2016 15: 10
      Colleague Nikolai, hello to you.
      I wouldn’t give an emotional assessment of the nuggets.
      They, like everyone else, have their own "nerds", and their "leaders", with the letter -p-, and theorists, and physicists and lyricists ... but anyone is.
      But here is their "guiding and guiding" - wow! This is some kind of lump. The rock is granite.
      Now they, disguised as Anglo-Saxons and "an exclusive nation", are doing their business.
      DO. Successfully doing. So successful that everyone lined up for the greenbacks, and - scary to say - debt obligations.
      That is, the United States, its leaders give a lot of debt. To the whole world.
      And they live happily ever after. The mustache is not blowing.
      Yes, for one such skill they can be envied. After all, they were able to somehow settle down - so that everyone else on tiptoe cannot reach them, having a bunch of pieces of paper ... backed by the same property of these creditors.
      States can do that.
      And the rest are not.
      ...
      So, I think, it’s not a matter of naglosaks. And in some naive innocence of the rest of the world.
      And again - you need to be able to do this. We can not. Regrettably. Duzhe correct.
  15. +2
    9 September 2016 11: 53
    It's time to destroy this colony of parasites and return the lands to the Indians
    1. +1
      9 September 2016 19: 05
      when will you destroy? Or already on a march?
  16. +7
    9 September 2016 11: 53
    In the usual style of Samsonov:
    The first part of the article is information from Wiki, which is quite useful.
    Second: lush ideological salad Olivier.
    The expansion of the Russian Empire can also be concocted - if neatly
    pulling strictly relevant facts - that the Russians only did, that they destroyed the peoples of Poland, Central Asia, the Caucasus and Siberia with fire and sword.
    In fact, the sharp territorial expansion of countries has never
    passed peacefully.
  17. PKK
    +1
    9 September 2016 12: 14
    [quote = voyaka uh]
    The expansion of the Russian Empire can also be concocted - if neatly
    pulling strictly relevant facts - that the Russians only did, that they destroyed the peoples of Poland, Central Asia, the Caucasus and Siberia with fire and sword.
    In fact, the sharp territorial expansion of countries has never
    passed peacefully. [/ quo
    Who is considered "Russian". If the War of Russian Peter the 1st with Muscovy, then yes, it was the Russians that expanded to the Caspian Sea and later E2 captured all of Siberia. All this is the tricks of the Oldenberg Dynasty, but what relation they had to the banking nation I don't know I will be grateful.
  18. +2
    9 September 2016 14: 21
    The first part, the historical part is all clear, a classic of double standards between territorial integrity and the right to self-determination. Instead of London, enter Kiev, and instead of the Continental Congress - the DPR and LPR, and it will be seen how some peoples can be self-determined to the detriment of territorial integrity, but not others.
    Against this background, the second, the author’s part with Great Scythia, the Aryans and Hyperborea, immediately began with some kind of fierce sectarianism, which I could not even read.
    1. +1
      9 September 2016 19: 19
      The article is negative in the sense that from 1776 the author switched to Indians, slaves, and the present time. But where then is the year 1776? This is the same thing that the ancient Germans reproach for Hitler or the Romans for Mussolini.
  19. +2
    9 September 2016 15: 24
    Quote: Diana Ilyina
    After changing the site and canceling the system of minuses, they came to us precisely from the TOGO resource! There are now many of these unfinished ...

    Do you, who even without reading the material, pounces on the commentators with personalized and delusional accusations of working for the State Department to talk about "completion"?))
  20. +3
    9 September 2016 15: 34
    The article is stupid fiction. As always from Samsonov.
    America has always been the "land of hope" for the European beggars. All the poor wanted to get there, since it was easier to get rich there. Yes, criminals also went there, but there were such cases in Russia (Cossacks).
    The United States of America is essentially New Babylon, an unnatural, parasitic state entity,

    Than this state is unnatural. If measured by the framework of the author, then all empires on earth (including the Russian one) are parasites and unnatural.
    so the moonshine still became a more effective weapon than a gun, since it killed entire generations, led to their degeneration, degradation. Pleasant tribes among themselves. And there was a clear force when there were a lot of colonists and they were able to dictate their conditions by force to the natives, expelling them to barren, deserted lands (reservations), condemning them to a slow and painful extinction and killing those who had the courage to resist.

    The Russian Empire did exactly the same when it conquered Siberia and Alaska.
    1. +1
      4 October 2016 19: 37
      I feel that on some topics, Mr. Samsonov simply has a diagnosis. I wish Cultural studies for students of technical universities edited by Prof. Baghdasaryan before reading such nonsense.
  21. 0
    9 September 2016 15: 38

    Quote: Lord Blacwood
    The Russian Empire did exactly the same when it conquered Siberia and Alaska.

    Can you confirm? And then vote.
    1. +1
      9 September 2016 16: 05
      Quote: Velizariy
      Can you confirm? And then vote.

      Certainly can. The picture "The Conquest of Siberia by Yermak" was seen. There is something that is not visible "kind and fair Rus", but you can see the battle with the indigenous population. Later, Russians began to settle in Siberia (in fact, to colonize).
      In Alaska, our troops fought with the Indians (there was even an article on this in VO). And how did you conquer the Caucasus?
      In general, the USA is the same empire as everyone else. And how all empires defend their interests, and we own. The fact that the United States was formed as a result of colonization does not mean anything, since a significant part of the acquisitions of the Russian Empire were also acquired by capture.
      1. 0
        9 September 2016 16: 20
        On the basis of slave labor - white and black, the masters of America began to create industry. Moreover, if in the North slave labor of white poor people was mainly used, then black slaves were mainly imported to the South, which were used in more primitive agriculture.

        As for slavery, the author is also wrong. There were no white slaves in the USA, but only black ones. At the same time, serfdom flourished in Russia, which was no different from slavery (moreover, the Russian people were in slavery).
        1. +1
          9 September 2016 16: 26
          But the local population NEVER intentionally and systematically destroyed, but, on the contrary, retained its identity and were not in reservations and other restrictions, all the more so there were no non-citizens.
          1. 0
            9 September 2016 18: 37
            Quote: Velizariy
            But the local population NEVER intentionally and systematically destroyed, but, on the contrary, retained its identity and were not in reservations and other restrictions, all the more so there were no non-citizens.

            How to say. The conquest of Siberia met with fierce resistance of the indigenous peoples, and the Cossacks sometimes destroyed entire villages. All conquered peoples were taxed, and those who did not want to pay were destroyed (sometimes whole villages). The interests of local peoples were not taken into account by the authorities, and later violent Russification of the population began.
          2. 0
            4 October 2016 19: 34
            Moreover, reservation territories in the USA are offshore zones. Need to explain what it gives to those who live there ?!
  22. +4
    9 September 2016 17: 22
    Evil article. The author lacks tolerance.
    Not everything was so bad as described. America had ups and downs. The emergence of America as a democratic state is undoubtedly taking off, but the past 40 years, America, obviously, is sliding into a crisis.
  23. +1
    9 September 2016 17: 23
    I always said: the USA is the Khazar Kaganate version 2.0.
  24. +5
    9 September 2016 19: 01
    I would not draw an analogy between the current USA and the USA of the 18th century. Even during Soviet times, historiography noted the progressive significance of the American Revolution. Lenin called it a just war against English usurpation. The founders of the United States did not seek to dominate the world. I recommend to everyone the book of the Soviet historian A. Fursenko "American Revolution and the Education of the USA" 1980.
  25. +5
    9 September 2016 21: 52
    Great nation. Everything for the prosperity of his people. That's who we all learn, study and learn from.
  26. +4
    9 September 2016 21: 52
    Nevertheless, the formation of the SGA was somewhat more reasonable: the Americans killed the Indians and used the slave labor of blacks, and our ancestors had to do this with fellow citizens.
  27. +2
    11 September 2016 18: 30
    Russia is a natural state. It was created by the state-forming people - Russian-Russians, while the Russians have lived on their territory for thousands of years (from the times of Great Scythia, the Aryans and the legendary Hyperborea) and created a unique Russian civilization

    No, I understand, every nation is trying to expose its story in a better light, but why come up with a frank heresy? Russia during its existence really built a unique culture, a kind of mixture of European and Horde, gave the world many wonderful scientists, composers, artists, poets. Is this not enough? Why powder people with their heads and come up with fairy tales? How lateral are the Scythians to Russia? Lived on the territory of modern Russia? This is almost the only thing that they have in common. I don’t want to write anything about Aryans and other things - the author should stop reading literature due to the authorship of psychiatric patients.
    with the natural inclusion of neighboring lands and peoples in the zone of their state (imperial) construction.

    Oh yes, natural. The Siberian peoples burned out, the Caucasus burned out, with ON and Poland in general fought all their lives. The Russian empire was expanding in the same way as all others - by fire and sword. It is unlikely that an adequate person can believe that the Russians are all well and good, and the French and the British are all pederasts and maniacs, eager to kill and force the Indians.
    Coming up with a nonexistent story for Russia will give her nothing but disappointment. In the USSR they also said that, they say, the peoples of the Union wanted to live in the same family with the Russian people. As a result, it turned out that half of them didn’t really want to. What this led to is known.
  28. 0
    4 October 2016 19: 30
    Russia is a natural state. It was created by the state-forming people, the Rus-Russians, while the Rus have lived for thousands of years on their territory (from the times of Great Scythia, the Aryans and the legendary Hyperborea) and created a unique Russian civilization with the natural inclusion of neighboring lands and peoples in the zone of their state (imperial) construction. That is, Russia is a natural state and a people-civilization. For example, the same are Japan or China.

    I've never read more delirium. A person does not know the basics of culturology, nor the works of Sorokin, Danilevsky, Jaspers, nor history by and large, but raves about Scythian-Rus and Hyperborea. Well, for VO, this is probably what you need. You just can't read that in "Questions of History".
    1. 0
      3 November 2016 15: 37
      Something hurt sharply. One, and in the eye. Labels do not need to sculpt. The Hyperborean version is essentially no worse than the Norman theory. And just culturology does not break this version. Cultural studies then dragged for sonority? And about the ridicule about Hyperborea, you can certainly laugh, but only with modern means of defeat no one can guarantee that your grandchildren will not be sitting in the caves with bone needles in their hands.
  29. 0
    3 November 2016 15: 23
    Khazar Khaganate. Version 2.0 The Rahdonite cause lives and thrives. The blood and lives of helpless goys are regularly converted into accumulated wealth, wealth into power, and so on without end.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"