The Pentagon and the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation to intercept an American reconnaissance aircraft over the Black Sea

62
The Pentagon claims that the Russian Su-27 intercepted the American reconnaissance aircraft Р-8 over the Black Sea, reports RIA News.





As stated by Reuters, a source in the US military, "the interception was made unsafe and unprofessional."

The Russian Defense Ministry commented on the statement of the US military.

“September 7 2016. P-8 Poseidon reconnaissance aircraft of the US Navy attempted to approach the state border of the Russian Federation over the Black Sea without transponders on” twice- said in a comment posted on Facebook.

“At the Belbek airbase, Su-27 fighters on duty were raised. After Russian fighters approached reconnaissance aircraft for visual identification and identification of aircraft numbers, American aircraft abruptly changed course and flew in the opposite direction from the state border of Russia. Russian pilots acted in strict accordance with international rules of air flights ", - declared in the Russian department.

“This is not the first attempt aviation NATO is approaching the state border of the Russian Federation for reconnaissance in the areas of the strategic command and staff exercises "Caucasus-2016". To meet the increased interest in the exercises, the Russian Ministry of Defense, in good faith, invited the military attachés from more than 60 countries, as well as about 100 foreign journalists, including from NATO countries, to the final stage of the practical rally., Says the release.

Announced the aggressive actions of the Russian armed forces and the Border Guard Service of Ukraine.

"The RF Armed Forces aggressively obstructed the lawful actions of the Marine Guard ship of the State Border Service of Ukraine," the agency said.

It is reported that "during the service of the Podolia Marine Guard Ship of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine in the northwestern part of the country's maritime economic zone, warships and aircraft of the Russian Armed Forces, in violation of generally accepted principles, norms and rules of international law, carried out dangerous maneuvers the actions of the border ship. " In particular, the Russian Su-24 at a dangerous height allegedly "flew around the ship" Podolie "several times."

"In fact, the aggressive actions of the Russian side on the high seas regarding the naval guard ship of the State Border Service of Ukraine were reported to the state leadership, and the Ministry of Defense, the General Staff, the Foreign Ministry and the law enforcement agencies were informed," the statement said.

On this incident, a comment from the Ministry of Defense has not yet been reported.
  • https://cont.ws
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    8 September 2016 08: 43
    again cry yaroslavny from mattresses and urinets lol
    the more tears the more relief
    in tears is the treatment
    1. +8
      8 September 2016 09: 09
      But they will interrogate what we can scare for real.
      1. +20
        8 September 2016 09: 12
        It’s just that our pilots do not see well and to read the tail number they fly up closer !!! fellow laughing
      2. +16
        8 September 2016 11: 40
        But they will interrogate what we can scare for real.

        It would be better not to be interrogated.
        The Czech major general in the reserve, Ginek Blashko, commented on the possible conflict between Russia and NATO and told the accompanying anecdote.
        "Obama and his generals are arguing at the Pentagon and cannot agree on when is the best time to attack Russia. Finally, they ask the French. The French answer:" We do not know, but definitely not in winter. It will end badly. "Then they decided to ask the Germans The Germans replied: "We do not know, but definitely not in the summer. We have already tried." What to do? Someone suggests asking China, because it is progressive and always offers new ideas. They asked the Chinese: when is the best time to attack Russia? The Chinese answer: "Right now! Russia has begun to build the Power of Siberia", "Turkish Stream", the "Vostochny" cosmodrome, a bridge to the Crimea, and in the near future the Russians want to modernize the Baikal-Amur Mainline, they are building new sports complexes for the World Cup and athletics, planning production in the Arctic ... In general, now they really need as many prisoners as possible! "
        1. +1
          8 September 2016 12: 10
          the interception was unsafe and unprofessional

          Oxymoron, however.
    2. +7
      8 September 2016 09: 18
      Comment on the actions of sixes from Ukraine below our national dignity, but their owners need to be reminded that the story with Powers could be repeated if they were impudent!
      1. +2
        8 September 2016 10: 11
        Duc and the history of the Tu-154 of Siberian Airlines may also repeat itself. Especially when conducting surprise checks and exercises.
    3. +3
      8 September 2016 09: 43
      Exercises in the Crimea and Sevastopol pass. Here are the SSPintsy and climb. Hotz consider and check ... Afraid means. They understand that it’s hard to learn, it’s easy in battle. Here they try to peep what the battle is preparing for them. And ours drove them away. For not figs to peep Not beautifully, not culturally and not safely for Pindo Stan!
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +3
          8 September 2016 10: 42
          Regarding the amers ... silently and without comment ... everyone understood about them. DB is DB
  2. +2
    8 September 2016 08: 46
    What to do when there are only jackals around the overseas Sherkhan.
  3. +2
    8 September 2016 08: 47
    Oh .... whiners once again ached ................
  4. +10
    8 September 2016 08: 50
    It's time for us to adopt this method from the Americans and raise a fuss about the violation of everything and everyone, while the planes are still in the air: "Treacherously violated, brazenly invaded, we were forced, call to condemn, etc., etc."
    1. +3
      8 September 2016 10: 02
      I agree. It is unacceptable for the US Air Force to fly near the Russian borders. Moreover, reconnaissance aircraft were dangerously close to the Russian border. Rather, it is the United States of America that is trying to impose democratic principles on Russia through aggressive methods, engaging in such provocations.
  5. +4
    8 September 2016 08: 54
    But they would not go to the rear of the cow ...
    Didn't include identification, get a rocket. The Ukrainians shot down a Tu154 with their "own" turned on Kuchma did not even apologize, dodge like a geyropeets, at the end he dumped a book that Ukraine is a tse eupora ...
    It is necessary to launch several drones constantly and to shoot at them from time to time (sometimes confusing with foreign scouts without identification) But what? How does the warhead know who the unidentified is flying there. Kerry said: you can shoot down!
    1. +8
      8 September 2016 09: 14
      Well, at the expense of shooting down, you got excited about it - there was no entry into our airspace. And to go in - there are no fools there either. Normal work is going on - they are exploring our air defense capabilities, we are likewise. We must also thank them - if they suddenly find gaps in our defense - there will be an opportunity to patch them in time! And they want to raise wages! laughing Moreover, whining is a sign of weakness. wink hi
      1. +1
        8 September 2016 11: 31
        I mean Putin’s proposal, it seems, in Finland, that we are: please, but the Americans themselves forbid the NATO members to include an identification ...
        But I’ll say that it’s a little related to aviation: it is not always possible to see an aircraft in passive mode. And in the TWS (SDS) mode, based on the Doppler effect, it is not always visible. Especially - and if the airship has a soft shell and the structure is made of radio-transparent material, the screening of engines, weapons. And he has a drift near the cloud - not a single radar operator will see.
      2. 0
        8 September 2016 11: 31
        I mean Putin’s proposal, it seems, in Finland, that we are: please, but the Americans themselves forbid the NATO members to include an identification ...
        But I’ll say that it’s a little related to aviation: it is not always possible to see an aircraft in passive mode. And in the TWS (SDS) mode, based on the Doppler effect, it is not always visible. Especially - and if the airship has a soft shell and the structure is made of radio-transparent material, the screening of engines, weapons. And he has a drift near the cloud - not a single radar operator will see.
      3. 0
        8 September 2016 11: 31
        I mean Putin’s proposal, it seems, in Finland, that we are: please, but the Americans themselves forbid the NATO members to include an identification ...
        But I’ll say that it’s a little related to aviation: it is not always possible to see an aircraft in passive mode. And in the TWS (SDS) mode, based on the Doppler effect, it is not always visible. Especially - and if the airship has a soft shell and the structure is made of radio-transparent material, the screening of engines, weapons. And he has a drift near the cloud - not a single radar operator will see.
  6. +8
    8 September 2016 08: 56
    “The interception was unsafe and unprofessional.”

    It’s time for the Americans to come up with a new formulation. This one is already sore. They themselves climb to our borders, and then begin to lament that they were met without flowers and bread and salt.
    "The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation aggressively impeded the legal actions of the ship of the Sea Guard of the State Border Service of Ukraine"

    And these there too. Probably, during the flight of our plane, the Ukrainian vessel scooped up water from the air stream on board. So they want to be like Americans and show that their aircraft also flies around Russian aircraft.
    1. +2
      8 September 2016 09: 02
      Quote: rotmistr60
      They themselves climb to our borders, and then begin to lament that they were met without flowers and bread and salt.

      So let them rejoice that without bread. Pvoshnik’s bread you know what
    2. +5
      8 September 2016 09: 05
      Quote: rotmistr60
      So they want to be like Americans and show that their aircraft also flies around Russian aviation

      So this tour was. Look at the marvelous marvelous - Ukrainian Navy
  7. +2
    8 September 2016 08: 57
    To be honest, it's boring. Same. They approached, we flew around them "unprofessionally", the State Department was indignant. Template.
  8. +3
    8 September 2016 08: 58
    And again the squeal of pigs
  9. +4
    8 September 2016 08: 58
    As always. Take off, drove off, landed. We are calmly not professional. How many times have said do not fly where it is impossible. Tailored pilots are just very high pros. They can land on our airdrome easily
  10. +5
    8 September 2016 09: 02
    Unprofessional but competent. The next time you need to be just as unprofessional in a box and forced to land, this will be a lesson for professionals.
    1. +5
      8 September 2016 10: 20
      Quote: avg-mgn
      Unprofessional but competent. The next time you need to be just as unprofessional in a box and forced to land, this will be a lesson for professionals.

      It is unlikely that we will go for it, but the Chinese once performed such a trick on April 1, 2001, with an American EP-3E Airis II electronic reconnaissance aircraft. According to Chinese officials, 104 km from Hainan Island, an American plane made an unexpected maneuver to the side Chinese cars by ramming one of them. As a result, the J-8II interceptor fell into the sea, killing its pilot. After that, the crew of the American car, under threat of the use of weapons, made an emergency landing at the Lingshui airfield on the Chinese island of Hainan.
      EP-3 at a Chinese airport


      China put all the blame for the US military aircraft incident on the United States. The Americans had to apologize for the incident and pay monetary compensation to the widow of the deceased Chinese pilot.
  11. +2
    8 September 2016 09: 09
    The answer should be short - fly safely at home.
  12. +2
    8 September 2016 09: 13
    they must not be intercepted, but knocked down already
    1. +8
      8 September 2016 09: 29
      Quote: wadulya
      they must not be intercepted, but knocked down already

      Knock down Poseidon is not difficult. Here on a visit to invite for intimate conversation and instrumentation to use curiosity for. It is high time
  13. +1
    8 September 2016 09: 29
    Fine! Everything is absolutely correctly done, there is nothing to roam in the open spaces of others.
  14. +5
    8 September 2016 09: 32
    I don’t understand anything. Ukraine speaks of Russia's aggressive actions against their ship ... But we have a damn war. Those. they had to bring down our plane or we would sink their ship. HOW IS THAT? Piglet screams at the top for 2 years that we, her mother, are WAR!
  15. +2
    8 September 2016 09: 37
    .... sob sob ...... and I’ll tell my mom everything .... aaaaaaa ...
  16. +7
    8 September 2016 09: 37
    As a source in the US military department told Reuters, “the interception was unsafe and unprofessional”

    I completely agree with the Pentagon. Professional interception leads to the death of a scout on the sea level. If he flew away on his stables, then the interception was not completed.
    1. +1
      8 September 2016 11: 19
      Quote: bycharashkO
      I completely agree with the Pentagon. Professional interception leads to the death of a scout on the sea level. If he flew away on his stables, then the interception was not completed.

      Theoretically, RS-135 and Poseidons can fly 23 km from the coast (a little more than 12 miles of territorial waters) without disturbing anything. In practice, we keep them at a distance of 100 km. What am I talking about. It is impossible to fill up at such a distance.
      1. +1
        8 September 2016 16: 05
        Sorry. But as you want ...
        1. 0
          8 September 2016 17: 16
          Quote: bycharashkO
          Sorry. But as you want.

          Not that word! Stand on 10 thousand hours for these pepelats, the desire to fill up will increase hundreds of times. But I say. Our former air defense planes. Now VKSniki. Solid guard pilots with a raid many times greater than the average NATO pilot. And to us, simple air defense workers are shown an Indian, national, hut. Not to fan out, to really NATO abstained. But no. Everything is clear on schedule. Flyers 30 percent, from the Earth 70. Nowadays, it is almost impossible to pull.
          Well, we are not professionals
  17. +1
    8 September 2016 09: 39
    Quote: cniza
    we can scare and for real.

    And this is how "truly" respected? More details please .... Do you really think that in such a situation the Russian Armed Forces will shoot down, ram, etc.?
  18. +1
    8 September 2016 09: 58
    Again, the whole chicken coop was alarmed, and as always "unprofessionally" it is interesting, but professionally is it to be forced to put on our airfield or with a nose in the sea?
  19. +1
    8 September 2016 10: 00
    They all want to be affectionately intercepted, carefully intercepted, but ours don’t know how they rigidly put in partners)
  20. +2
    8 September 2016 10: 00
    Where can we, lapotniks, "safely and professionally". winked
  21. +1
    8 September 2016 10: 03
    All our comments should begin with the words: "On the next brazen, shameless lies of English-speaking geeks, we declare ..." or "we bring to the attention", not the point ...
    Until such momentum is included in the speech of our officials, the Westerners, led by the stupid Gopnik, the star-bearer, will continue to be slow and outrageous!
  22. 0
    8 September 2016 10: 06
    Quote: Muvka
    I don’t understand anything. Ukraine speaks of Russia's aggressive actions against their ship ... But we have a damn war. Those. they had to bring down our plane or we would sink their ship. HOW IS THAT? Piglet screams at the top for 2 years that we, her mother, are WAR!

    They all want to be affectionately intercepted, carefully intercepted, but ours don’t know how they rigidly put in partners)
  23. 0
    8 September 2016 10: 07
    Quote: Korney84
    It’s just that our pilots do not see well and to read the tail number they fly up closer !!! fellow laughing

    Yes, her)) They all want to be kindly, carefully intercepted, but ours don’t know how they are hard put to partners)
  24. +2
    8 September 2016 10: 10
    It's time for everyone to understand that the game "Zarnitsa" is over. The real work began. There is nothing to stick your snout into someone else's trough. So after all, you can drown in the Black Sea
  25. +3
    8 September 2016 10: 11
    Oh, brave American warriors! Who would have thought that the US military flyers did not know and were not ready that the Russian Air Force would guard the Russian airspace. After all, these are Russian national interests in our own state. Is the USA here also their national interests? Ah, sorry, I forgot about American exceptionalism.
  26. +2
    8 September 2016 10: 18
    In the picture SU-35!
  27. +3
    8 September 2016 10: 18
    I wonder why there is no video? Is it really not interesting for our to lay it out for everyone?
    1. +1
      8 September 2016 12: 55
      Quote: sabakina
      I wonder why there is no video? Is it really not interesting for our to lay it out for everyone?

      What's interesting. Routine. Ours fly up from two sides, one shows rockets, the other can visit. The scout is falling off. The incident is over. Further, Poseidon will wind the route along an invisible line of 100 km for 10 hours for another 12 days, carrying the brain to ground-based air defense. Tuesday Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and so on for three weeks. Then he will dump home.
      It is interesting?
      1. 0
        8 September 2016 16: 25
        If only one, yes. And then they are steadily pumping
        Tuesday, September 6th, two American aircraft conducted reconnaissance near Russian borders on the Black Sea, and the next day - three...
        Approached the shores of Crimea fourth in a day american reconnaissance aircraft
        https://lenta.ru/news/2016/09/08/flyspy/
  28. +2
    8 September 2016 10: 44
    [quote] [/ quote] As a source in the US military department told Reuters, "the interception was unsafe and unprofessional."
    A source in the Russian military department: "As we can, we intercept."
  29. +3
    8 September 2016 11: 05
    "Shaw ... again ?!" ))))
  30. +2
    8 September 2016 13: 35
    Unprofessional? When is it professionally brought down, or what?
  31. 0
    8 September 2016 14: 36
    How are you all screaming here different from the Amer’s military department? Damn, how long can we, ours fly at their borders, they intercept, they fly, we intercept !!! Or do you think our Defense Ministry does not express concern about the interception of our scouts ... Yes, the same guys, it’s just that it’s not stupidly published in VO, because there’s no reason!
  32. +1
    8 September 2016 16: 03
    again they will begin to whine again, about unprofessional interception, an exclusively whining state
  33. +2
    8 September 2016 16: 54
    Russian pilots acted in strict accordance with international air flight regulations
  34. 0
    8 September 2016 18: 50
    Of course, not professionally, if it would have been professionally shot down and sunk laughing impudent penguins from Penguinistan.
  35. 0
    8 September 2016 20: 32
    Meet them somewhere farther from the border, especially during exercises
  36. 0
    8 September 2016 22: 26
    One can agree with the ambiguous assessment “the interception was performed unsafely and unprofessionally” But those who give ambiguous assessments of the “partner's” actions are in danger: next time, to make it safe and professional, the device will simply be shot down!
  37. 0
    9 September 2016 06: 06
    we fly on our territory, and no one called the Yankees at the World Cup
  38. 0
    9 September 2016 09: 06
    Gg. the American military, as well as their Ukrainian wards. First, say thank you that the flights were carried out "unprofessionally", if you were hit "professionally", the fish would get acquainted with your wreckage, and your pilots would sit in our pre-trial detention center. Secondly, if you wanted to find out the details of our teachings, you would ask Shoigu, he would answer you (of course, except for this, and this and that). Thirdly, however, thank you, you introduced an additional element of surprise into the course of our exercises, our pilots coped with the task. Please fix it.
  39. 0
    9 September 2016 14: 59
    I don’t understand at all that a plane of an underdeveloped state, located more than 10000 km away. from the border of Russia, did in the Black Sea ..
  40. 0
    9 September 2016 20: 24
    Of course, it wasn’t professional when used to land in the traditional way, it would be used professionally.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"