Casus belli 9 / 11

51
Casus belli 9 / 11


This year's 11 September 2001 marks 15 years. In the morning, in New York, after the strikes of hijacked (according to the official, of course, version) passenger planes, the towers of the World Trade Center collapsed.



It was with this plane that the investigation subsequently had the most problems, since its fragments and the remains of the passengers were not found, and the hole in the wall was much smaller than the wingspan of this aircraft.

This is not the only oddities associated with the collapse of the twin towers.

The official death toll is 2843 person. In New York, colossal destruction, but in the midst of this destruction they find a completely whole machine, in which lie untouched and clean Quran and passports of the hijackers. Immediately I recall the phrase of the main character of the film “Beware of the car” Detochkin: “The beer has just been brought, and the fish has just been caught.”

Already on September 11, President Bush has declared that this is an action of Arab terrorists. CIA chief George Tenet announced the interception of the al-Qaida link on September 11. Suddenly it turned out that everything was intercepted, but nothing was prevented!

The investigation revealed a lot of inconsistencies in the official version. For example, within 40 minutes after hijacking, there was no connection between the Federal Civil Agency aviation and the aerospace defense command of North America. Journalists noted confusion in the testimony of Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld. The authorities admitted that they had been warned by the special services about the impending terrorist attack, but nothing was done. Also on September 11, ironically, military exercises were conducted, during which an imitation of aircraft hijacking was planned. In Gilbert Chesterton’s short story “Broken Sword” to the question: “Where does an intelligent person hide a pebble?”, Pater Brown replies: “Among the pebbles on the seashore.” What could be a better cover than training?

Nevertheless, despite all this confusion, the Kina-Zelikova commission came to an absolutely iron conclusion - this is a terrorist attack in which Al Qaeda is to blame. The Commission was unable to answer a number of questions. Why did the towers fall exactly? Why did the firemen hear the explosions inside the towers? ..
There are still some oddities. For example, a representative of FEMA, the American equivalent of our Emergencies Ministry, Tom Kenny, in an interview with 12 in September, said that a rescue team arrived in New York on Monday, 10 in September, so that rescuers could get to work with 11 in the morning. Mayor Giuliani also reported that on September 10 rescuers were stationed at the 92 berth, which after the explosion became the command center of the rescue operation. The question is - is it a thorough preparation for an unexpected terrorist attack ?!

NewsWeek magazine from 24 September 2001 wrote that 10 September a group of Pentagon officers canceled their flights the next morning. And in February, 2002, it became known that a group of businessmen, who usually held their meetings in a shopping center in the towers, held their September 11 at the Air Force base in Nebraska.

According to the observation of Victor Friedman, the author of a very interesting study of the terrorist attack, in the first days of September, purposeful activity reigned on the exchange. In his opinion, some people were well aware of future explosions, because the ratio of put options and call options was such that some people at once earned 10-15 billions of dollars. And the owner of the towers, a big friend of Israel, Larry Silverstein, received 5 billions of dollars of insurance.

There were evidence before the attack. One of the most striking events happened in June 2001, when the ufologist William Cooper, the famous author of the book “Pale Horse”, made a statement that in September, or at the latest in October, serious attacks would take place in the United States, and they would be blamed for a man named osama bin laden. This man had unique information, so it is not surprising that at the end of 2001, Cooper was shot dead by police, accusing him of resisting the police first and then trying to escape. The police were not told that Cooper was a Vietnam veteran, and instead of one of his legs he has a prosthesis - you do not run. To finish the police topic: according to eyewitness accounts, after the first tower collapsed, the police were immediately sent to the second, which began to drive people away from the tower (“they just caught a vobla”).

Also, undoubted evidence is the fact that in July 2001, at the talks with Pakistan, the Americans frankly stated that in October they would seize Afghanistan. In September, even before the explosions, the UK in its annual maneuvers Essential Harvest held the most significant concentrations of naval forces off the coast of Pakistan. At the same time, NATO maneuvers in Egypt end up with the 40 of thousands of soldiers being transferred to Pakistan.

Americans generally have a wonderful tradition - to resolve geopolitical problems to create situations similar to September 11. For example, February 15 1898, an explosion occurred on the American battleship raid in Havana on the American battleship. Armadillo command: 266 man, of whom 260 are black and 6 are white officers. There is evidence that when the explosion occurred, there were no white officers on the ship. The Americans blamed the Spaniards for the death of their ship, which was the reason for the US-Spanish war. As a result, Cuba became an American semi-colony.

The next issue in the program of the American self-propelling is an incident with the liner "Lusitania". Although Lusitania was sunk on 7 on May 1915, and the United States entered World War 2 on April 1917, however, the sinking of this steamer was a turning point in creating a belligerent mood among the Americans. This interesting historical event should be discussed in more detail. Although the Lusitania was a passenger vessel carrying a 1200 man (of which 195 were Americans) carrying it - in violation of all wartime rules - 6 million ammunition for the Entente countries paid for by the Morgan house. The Germans, having learned about this, made an advance payment to fifty American newspapers and asked to publish an announcement that they did not recommend American citizens to sail in Lusitania, since the ship carries ammunition and according to the rules of wartime automatically becomes a target. But only one American newspaper in Des Moines, Iowa, published this ad, 49 abstained from the rest of the newspapers, because the US State Department recommended that they wait until they clarify the circumstances. The circumstances, naturally, were not clarified, and the Lusitania set sail. She crossed the Atlantic, as the Germans did not sink it, entered the English Channel and began to expect the ship-pilot "Juno". After a long wait, the captain of the Lusitania unexpectedly received a message that the first Lord of the Admiralty Churchill had sent the pilot ship Juno very far, and they would have to wait for him for a long time. The Germans watching the steamer understand that it is impossible to wait any longer and you need to sink the liner, because 6 has millions of ammunition sets - very seriously. An order is given to "destroy." The British intercept this order, but take absolutely no action. “Lusitania” is safely drowned, which is becoming one of the incidents of belli for the USA to enter the war.

The 7 events of December 1941 of the year, when 3,5 hundreds of Japanese aircraft attacked the American base at Pearl Harbor, destroyed 200 aircraft and the 4 battleship, including the battleship Arizona, destroyed more than 2 thousands of Americans. As a result, the United States had a reason to declare war on Japan. Since then, American researchers have done a lot to clarify this situation. It has now been practically proven that a year before the events at Pearl Harbor, the Americans hacked the Japanese codes. This suggests that they were well aware of the plans of Japan. However, Roosevelt did not lift a finger, because he needed a reason for America to enter the war.

Speaking of Roosevelt, it would not be superfluous to mention the following: the scheme “Roosevelt’s new course solved all the problems of the USA” is just a myth. Yes, he solved some problems, but he created new problems. These problems were so serious that in the middle of the 30s, Roosevelt had a very dangerous rival on the American political scene - Louisiana Governor Hugh Long. It was Hugh Long who became the prototype for Robert Penn Warren’s novel “All the King's Men” by Willy Stark. Hugh Long was a left-wing populist; he created property redistribution societies throughout America. By the year 1935, 8 million people have signed up for them. In 1935, the same year, Hugh Long kills, as it should be - a loner. This copy is known to us from stories kills of the Kennedy brothers, Martin Luther King, Lincoln. By the end of 1930, America was faced with a choice: either serious social reforms, which could, however, lead to upheavals, or world war (by the way, Roosevelt began using the term “world war” six months earlier than Hitler).

Undoubtedly, Pearl Harbor solved the problems of declaring war on Japan - after all, Roosevelt went to the polls with a firm promise not to let America be drawn into the war. At the same time, both he and the forces behind him understood perfectly: in order to become the hegemon of the world capitalist system, America must go to war, more precisely, it needs force majeure circumstances that will force the US to start a “return war”. Ironically, one of the last commissions that dealt with the Pearl Harbor problem in America ended 11 on September 2001 of the year. The experts concluded that the Japanese torpedoes were too outdated and weak to penetrate the armor of the "Arizona". Something else happened. Most likely, there was an explosion on the "Arizona" itself. But since September 11 had an explosion of towers, the events at Pearl Harbor - “the days of bygone days” - almost did not bother anyone.

In the list of American incidents, Belli can also recall the incident in the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964, which was the reason for the United States to enter the war in Vietnam. Americans shouted to the whole world that the North Vietnamese fired at them in neutral waters. Then it turned out that the DRV seamen opened fire on a ship that had invaded the territorial waters of their country, but that was later, when the US had already used this incident that they had provoked to start military operations.

As we can see, the Americans have a very rich history of crossbows. Whoever wants to know the true story will easily recognize it. Whoever does not want, he will sincerely believe that Al-Qaeda and a man named bin Laden are behind the bombings.

Much has already been written about this character, but it’s worth talking about it in brief, because this figure clearly shows how the explicit and even more secret American policy is structured.

Bin Laden was born in 1957 year. In December, 1979, at the suggestion of his patron, Prince Turki al-Faisal, who for more than 20 years headed the special services of Saudi Arabia, bin Laden began to manage the financial side of secret CIA operations in Afghanistan. He managed with the help of systematized information, a matrix, which in Arabic is called “Al-Qaeda” (translated as “database”). Subsequently, that phantom organization (many researchers do not believe in its existence) became so called, on which the Americans blamed for the explosion of the twin towers.

After the end of the war in Afghanistan, the Islamists split into those who believed that America was the enemy, and those who believed that America needed to be friends and contact. Bin Laden ended up in the camp of Hassan Al-Turabi, the leader of the anti-Americanists. In 1996, Osama declares jihad against the United States and Israel. In 1998, after the terrorist attacks in Dar es Salaam and Nairobi, where almost 300 people were killed and 4500 people were injured, the United States accused bin Laden of everything and put him on a wanted list. Then they begin to hang on him all the attacks, including the events of 11 September. In 2011, we were informed that Osama was killed as a result of a special operation. According to very reputable people from Western intelligence agencies, bin Laden was not alive after the 2007 year. Speaking about the massacre of 11, I would like to draw attention to the mores of the modern American elite. The media showed how in the White House at the TV screen, to see the show, how people would be killed, the first persons of the state gathered. Only “Wow!” Was not told, as in the case of Gaddafi, otherwise the identical picture is the joyful contemplation of a bloody murder. By the way, all the American special forces involved in this operation, after 1,5 or 2 of a month, were ambushed under rather strange circumstances, and almost all were killed. Either they were really removed to hide the ends in the water, or they were simply hidden in this way from possible revenge.

In the history of “terrorist number 1”, it is also surprising that the bin Laden family had a privileged position and long-standing ties with both the Bush family and the Saud family. One example is enough. In 1979, the Islamists staged an explosion seizing a mosque in Mecca. They shot the pilgrims, captured the mosque. The trucks and the mosque’s plan were delivered to the terrorists by one of bin Laden’s elder brothers. All participants of this terrorist attack were seized and executed. Except for the one who provided them with trucks, because he is from the bin Laden family. In fact, Bush, Saud, Bin Laden is one economic unit. It is significant that the finances of the bin Laden group in America were managed by the CarlyleGroup, which occupied the 11-e place in the American military industrial complex. The group was created in 1987, and people like the former CIA chief, Frank Carlucci, former British Prime Minister Major George W. Bush, worked in it. Bush himself has repeatedly overlapped with representatives of the bin Laden family. In particular, when he made money on illegal economic operations at HarkenEnergyCorporation, he borrowed a very large amount from one of bin Laden’s elder brothers and could not give it away. This older brother then died on an airplane while flying over the territory of the United States. Some journalists believe that this could have been done on the orders of the father of the hapless debtor, the then-president Bush Sr.

Let's go back, however, in September 2001. Events immediately after the terrorist attack developed at a frantic pace. Already on September 12, Congress resolution No. 1368 “The US Right to Self-Defense” is being issued, the right to aggression is actually legalized. September 13, in order to warm up the population, the White House is being evacuated - ostensibly the danger of explosions remains. 14 September Congress allows Bush to "resort to the use of any force against any country, organization or individual that has prepared, committed or facilitated the September 11 attacks." October 7 Bush announces that he ordered the attack on the camps of terrorists and Taliban in Afghanistan. So begins the American military operation "Eternal Freedom."

Interestingly, a note by a senior American analyst Wong to the Institute for Strategic Studies of the US Army says: “The current public support for military action is comparable in level to the one that followed the attack in Pearl Harbor. The Americans say today that they consider military actions to be appropriate, that they are for a long war and that they have enough will to endure all the negative consequences of the war. ”

Earlier, on September 11, Henry Kissinger wrote: “The government should be entrusted with the mission to provide systematic retaliatory measures that would lead, we hope, to the same result that followed the attack on us in Pearl Harbor - to the destruction of the system responsible for this attack. This system is a network of terrorist organizations that are hiding in the capitals of certain states. ”

Which is very significant and symbolic, both Kissinger and Wong recall Pearl Harbor. Kissinger cannot but know that Pearl Harbor is a provocation. He equalizes Pearl Harbor and 11 of September, and thus indirectly lets it slip. Isn't it strange that already September 11 knows which terrorists did this, and links them to Baghdad and Kabul.

In September 2000, the US government announced a project for the "new American century" - "Restructuring America's Defense." Among its authors are Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush (Bush's younger brother), Donald Rumsfeld. The draft says: “The transformation process (of the world. - A.F.), even if it brings revolutionary changes, is likely to be a long one, unless some catastrophic and accelerating event happens, like the new Pearl Harbor” (underscore me. –AF.) And again - Pearl Harbor as a model, as an approach. People who know very well what Pearl Harbor was about say that they need a new Pearl Harbor. Similarly, at the beginning of the 17th century, Ivan Bolotnikov, already surrounded by Vasily Shuisky's troops, sent letters of commendation around the country with the request to announce some new Dmitry. He knows that Dmitriy is a lzaretshevich ...

In the 2003 year begins the US-British aggression against Iraq. And if Afghanistan is geopolitics and narcotics, then Iraq is geopolitics, oil, and a course to redraw the Arab world, to create in the interests of American TNCs a patchwork quilt called the "Greater Middle East." It must be said that drug trafficking and the interests of clans that control drugs play a very large role in all changes in the Middle East, starting with the American aggression against Afghanistan and ending with the so-called Arab Spring. Before the US invasion, the Taliban reduced the production of heroin in Afghanistan, and after the invasion it increased dramatically. The US invasion of Iraq provided the American military establishment with a very significant source of income. And not only the American, but also the English establishment, since the heroin production area in Afghanistan, as one of the American generals let it out, is the area of ​​responsibility of MI-6. In general, according to analysts involved in drug trafficking, 90% of drug trafficking production is controlled by three special services: MI-6, CIA and Mossad, and 10% are in the hands of various mafia structures. Today, Blair is free to repent and say that the introduction of troops into Iraq was a mistake, but the matter was done, and no one answered for it.
From a series of reservations on Freud: in September 2002, the Bush administration announced a document called the US National Security Strategy. There is just a wonderful phrase in it: "The events of 11 September opened up new giant opportunities for us." The amazing thing is that the United States openly talks about its plans and opportunities, and the world media are silent!

When the Soviet Union shot down the South Korean Boeing that invaded its territory, the world press went crazy. She, in vain, branded the Soviet Union. I will not discuss here and now the question of whether the Soviet Union shot down a passenger Boeing or some other Boeing, and put a passenger in Okinawa, taking a non-disclosure 25-year non-disclosure subscription from South Koreans . Let me remember something else: in five years in 2008, the American aircraft carrier shot down the Iranian Boeing over the territory of the Persian Gulf (not over the territory of the USA!). Killed 1988 people. Ronald Reagan said that it is a pity that people died, but even though the captain of the aircraft carrier was mistaken, he acted absolutely correctly, as he considered that the plane was a threat. The world media did not criticize either Reagan or the United States - it is clear: one thing, when the USSR knocks something down, is unacceptable; another thing is when the “democratic and free state of the United States” does the same thing — it is permissible.

The fact that September 11 allowed the Americans to solve a number of foreign policy tasks is one side of the matter, an external one. No less important is the inside. It is impossible not to agree with those journalists, analysts, who believe that the September 11 explosions became the prelude to the change of the US political regime. No, the facade remains the same, but there have been dramatic changes within the country. The executive has created new structures that allow them to extend to domestic policy the methods that in the 1990s and earlier the CIA and the armed forces used outside the country. America has become de facto a military empire. This is very well described in the Chalmers Johnson trilogy “Blowback”, “The sorrows of empire” (“The sorrows of the empire”) and “Nemesis” (“Nemesis”). Strangely, only the last part of the trilogy was translated into Russian. Chalmers Johnson is a renowned analyst, a CIA man. At the end of the 1990s, he, concerned about what was happening in the USA, wrote this trilogy, in which he showed that during the Clinton presidency, a monkalevinsky façade had very important changes in the USA. According to Chalmers Johnson, the de facto military took control of the United States. And the events of September 11 allowed this to turn de facto into de jure. How?

October 8 2001 was created in the United States by the Homeland Security Bureau. He was led by Tim Ridge. This event marked the beginning of a deep reform of the American state apparatus. This Bureau has become equivalent to the National Security Council, and, in fact, turned into something similar to the Bureau of military mobilization of the Second World War. The “Patriotic Act” (“The Patriotic Act”), adopted by October 26 of the year 2001, dramatically expanded the powers of the investigating authorities, tightened control over the American population, favoring police brutality. So the name of terror in the United States institutionalized and legalized the police state.

In November, 2002, under the pretext of protecting against terrorism, Bush signed the launch of the Total Information Awareness program. This program allows the US government to collect any information about all those who are interested in it in all world databases without any restrictions. Admiral John Poindexter was appointed in charge of this program. In Russian, they say about such people: “there is no place to put marks”. This man was implicated in the Irangate scandal that flared up in 1986 — 1987 during the Iran-Iraq war over the clandestine import weapons to Iran from countries such as Israel and the USA .... The investigation lasted a very long time, and only in 1999, he received 18 months in prison for the destruction of documents that testified to his guilt.

In addition to this “Total Information Awareness”, the Americans launched another information control program - “The Matrix” (what is the name!). Under the guise of collecting anti-terrorism information, this program collects information about all US citizens and their preferences. No wonder many analysts say that if in the 1990s of the United States from the republic turned into a military empire, then after the events of September 11, they are rapidly turning into a new Reich, into a fascist state. In the article “The Fascist American Theocratic State Emerged,” published in February 2002 of the year, journalists John Stanton and Wayne Madsen write: “Historians recall that between November 2001 of the year and February of 2002 of the year democracy, such as it appeared to the drafters of the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution , died. And while democracy gave off her breath, a fascist and theocratic American state was born. ”

As the English say: “Every acquisition is a loss and every loss is an acquisition” (“Every acquisition is a loss, and every loss is an acquisition”). Russians say differently: “Do not wake famously while it is quiet.” The American neocons during the Bush presidency have awakened forces in the Middle East that are now unable to control. America is overstressed. Americans need to leave the Middle East in the old capacity and come in some other. For the period of the shift change, they need controlled chaos, and it is now being created by the Islamists, whom R. Labevière called “the chain dogs of globalization in an American way”. As is often the case in history - a certain event, solving short-term measures, creates mid-term problems. To solve medium-term problems, we need medium-term measures, and they give rise to long-term systemic problems that you cannot solve without changing the system. Today it is clear: the situation in the Middle East is out of American control, the chaos becomes uncontrollable and turns against the “gentlemen chaosogenov” stumbled upon Syria, more precisely, on the position of Russia (as well as China, Iran and some other forces). In this situation, a nervous breakdown of the outgoing hegemon cannot be ruled out, especially if the president is a woman who in the States is called “Killi Clinton” (to kill). American journalists account for the Clintons for about 400 strange deaths. If so, then we just have the second edition of Bonnie and Clyde, just not a cinematic one. It must be remembered that people who are not inclined to restrain nervous impulses, be it everyday life or foreign policy, understand the language of force well. Then they keep their promises. Gaddafi believed without power - and paid. With regard to such characters, which are now often called “partners,” Shakespeare's Hamlet once said: “... whom I believe as two vipers” (“whom I will trust as I will adders' fanged”). That's the way we should believe in reboot suggestions and much more.

... As for the events of 11 September, then the whole truth about them, most likely, we will never know. Yes, in fact, all the detailed truth at the moment and is not required. Practically everything was clear from the very beginning - there is a wonderful clarifying question: cui bono? (who benefits?). I think that now, when America is in a position much worse than at the end of the twentieth century, we again have to wait for the war. The CIA is at the ready. The only thing that, unlike the Mossad and MI-6, they work very roughly, clumsily, with the help of white threads. But that’s what the media needs, or rather, SMRAD (Mass advertising, agitation and misinformation), which these white threads paint over with black. US journalists succeeded so much that even a significant part of their professorship - the country's intellectual elite - believes that the bin Laden exploded the September 11 towers. In such cases I answer them: “And Kennedy killed Lee Harvey Oswald. Moreover, he acted, of course, alone - as earlier Booth, who killed Lincoln, and Sirhan Sirhan, who shot Robert Kennedy. The investigation is over - forget it. But we can hardly forget the events of September 11, since it was with this provocation that the last desperate offensive of the most aggressive segment of the Anglo-American elite, seeking to save itself at the cost of most of humanity, began.
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    8 September 2016 06: 25
    The military-industrial elite of the defendants is to blame. The answer to the question - who benefits from this?
  2. +4
    8 September 2016 07: 15
    Still, conspiracy theology. The fact that the Americans on the full program took advantage of the terrorist attack to solve domestic and foreign policy problems is unconditional.

    But I don’t believe in what they themselves organized. Too many people are involved; the risk of exposure is enormous.
    Maybe I'm a naive idealist, but even in the version "knew, but did not intentionally prevent"I do not believe it. Amerians are always ready and happy to bomb the Papuans with joysticks - when the guts and severed legs are not visible. The Ping-Doras are always for when some Papuans kill each other in their name. But in order to kill thousands on their territory I don't think there are any of its own citizens. Here quantity develops into quality. And what a colossal blow to the prestige of the city on the hill!

    And most of all I don’t believe that’s why. The FSB, of course, is not the KGB. But since in the conditions of a monstrous confrontation, Russia does not use this argument for the complete overthrow of the United States, it means that there was no conspiracy. The fact that the FSB does not know this is babble. The fact that there is some kind of secret non-disclosure agreement with the United States is even more stupid. Where is this arrangement? Why is Crimea still denied if the towers of the Shopping Center and the Pentagon (which, by the way, have no towers - see the text of the article) were destroyed by the Americans themselves?
    1. +14
      8 September 2016 08: 05
      Quote: Gormengast
      I don’t believe in what they themselves organized. Too many people are involved; exposure risk - colossal ...
      The fact that there is some kind of secret non-disclosure agreement with the US is even more stupid ...

      What "exposure risk"? Having almost 100% control over the major media in their country and 99% control over the media in the rest of the world, as well as using the Fed as a basic argument, and thanks to this, almost 100% control over business in all parts of the world - the risk becomes Just one argument is enough - the Fed is on its territory, and any exposure is irrelevant.
      "And what a colossal blow to the prestige of the city on the hill!"- yes, nothing. Prestige does not give them anything, it is more important for them to simply manage the economy of the whole world.
      Quote: Gormengast
      Maybe I’m a naive idealist, but I don’t believe even in the version "they knew, but deliberately did not prevent"

      Unfortunately, you seem really idealist! I remember a huge stream of articles, books, films (unfortunately, mostly in English), as well as the personal impressions of friends who visited the United States at that time, as they said that half of the population did not believe the official statements and believed that the sabotage was committed by the US federal authorities themselves. There was a lot of evidence of this. To my regret, the Russian-language media segment covered these events very poorly. I was most impressed by the New Zealand film "9/11 in plane" - it clearly, step by step, based on the available materials, shows that not Boeing planes with Royle Royce engines crash into the towers, but C-10 military aircraft , similar in shape to Boig, but with Prat & Whitney engines, not used in civil aviation but used only on military aircraft, while the airframe itself in the lower fuselage had a distinct protrusion for the built-in radar antenna. That is, the planes themselves were purely military, without windows, and possibly even without crews and were controlled by guidance signals. By the way, this film was banned in the United States, so there are a lot of factual materials, only they practically did not reach us. And even if they did, then in my opinion it absolutely did not change anything.
      1. +2
        8 September 2016 11: 23
        Gormenghast is right. Let me explain why. The longer the chain of those involved, the greater the risk that somewhere "leaks", especially with so many victims. And this is not observed.
      2. +3
        8 September 2016 11: 54
        1. The scale of the conspiracy is simply monstrous, indescribable. This does not Oswald eliminate; it is thousands of victims.
        2. The risk of exposure. Again, I say that the FSB cannot but know. Therefore, the disclosure here will not be through Wikileaks, but official, from the FSB, with documents. Just something everyone will hear; every single one of america.
        3. The scale of the consequences of such a revelation will be worse than the fall of Lehman Brothers - because it will not go along the economic line, but along the political line. Russia is in a fierce confrontation with the United States now. There is absolutely no reason to hide such a king bomb under the pillow. This was acceptable in 2001-2013, but not now.
        4. And where is this exposure? Or where objective evidence that there is any agreement on this subject between Russia and the United States? There is not the slightest trace.
        5. If there was a conspiracy, the United States would long ago recognize the Russian Crimea and there would be no sanctions.
        1. +3
          8 September 2016 18: 02
          Why should the Federal Security Service look for something in someone else's territory? or did you mean the GRU?
          Hundreds of people are not needed in the installation of equipment and explosives, 5-6 people with good training are enough. Capturing aircraft is also possible plus remote control capabilities - it turns out that this has been possible for a long time. And to muffle / disable communication channels on an uncontrolled pilot plane does not seem to be a serious task.
          In this situation, there could also be no one in the aircraft at all - autopilot take off - then flight at the heading, dispatchers can not be informed.

          Firefighters police, etc. - simply not in the know, ordinary performers could work blindly without understanding what they were doing at all.
          Some brought and brought boxes, others unpacked and mounted, for example, air conditioners in the basement and on the floors (any equipment) in accordance with the plan provided by third parties, the fourth carried out commissioning - nothing criminal, except possibly appropriate bookmarking in equipment, about which none of does not know these four.
          1. 0
            9 September 2016 09: 34
            You take an interest in the functions of special services. The FSB also conducts intelligence activities abroad. So count who conducts intelligence activities outside of Russia:
            1. GRU
            2. SVR
            3.FSB
            4. FSO
            By the way, the FPS (frontier guards) was also on this list until it entered the FSB.
    2. +3
      8 September 2016 08: 09
      I hope that such non-believing “clever people” like you are in the overwhelming minority. Although who knows ... Judging by the fact that the people will vote for the United Russia again (EVERYTHING has been done for this), the 25-year moronization of the country is quite successful.
      1. +11
        8 September 2016 12: 36
        Although who knows ... Judging by the fact that the people will again vote for EP (EVERYTHING has been done for this), the 25-year-old debilitation of the country is quite a success.

        I will not vote for the EP, BUT suggest another option, FOR WHOM ?! I've voted for the Communist Party since the 90s, but what's the point ?! I was only convinced that Zyuganov is a complete political prostitute, especially after the 1996 elections, when he really won. So what?! What did this **** do with a majority in parliament ?! The answer is NOTHING !!! He just balabol and took root at the feeding trough, using the KOMMUNISTOV brand, and making himself a good deal on this brand. Who else remains ?! Fair Russia - don't tell my slippers. About "parnassus", "rosty" and other liberal riffraff generally keep silent. Who else?! I wanted to vote for Starikov, so he seemed to be removed from the run, but in my opinion, there is no one else!
  3. +8
    8 September 2016 07: 24
    Allen Dulles, the "father" of the US Secret Services, was more cynical, but also more definite: "We do not need a world that will no longer need us ... No one in their right mind will prepare their own" death ".... If the state gets in our way, then let the state die ... We must always remember about our "reproduction" every minute - this is our main task .... we must constantly create conditions in which we will be needed ... The effectiveness of our organization does not lie in eliminating all existing and future threats, but in the fact that by destroying one threat we must immediately generate a new threat, or even better, two or three new threats that will require more efforts to neutralize them, which means more funding for our organization ... These threats should not be hidden, veiled, understandable only to specialists, but become explicit and comprehensive, understandable and frightening for every layman not only in our country ...need constantly, that's when we will exist forever ... And if the world is destined to burn, let it burn, but we must be the last to burn ... "
  4. +3
    8 September 2016 07: 27
    Quote: RiON
    The author, in my opinion, has gone beyond the mind

    Well no. The author deliberately went through historical events to show that one can expect everything from the Americans when they reach their goal.
  5. +2
    8 September 2016 07: 51
    to one of the Pentagon towers[i] [/ i]

    The Pentagon has no towers.
    1. +2
      8 September 2016 08: 41
      Darth
      Revan Today, 07:51
      to one of the towers of the Pentagon [i] [/ i]

      The Pentagon has no towers.
      and there is no Pentagon ...)))))
  6. +1
    8 September 2016 08: 53
    I agree with RiON. Now, in essence, what is the article? There is such a thing as "Information noise". So this article is Information noise. A lot of things have been pulled up, and without a systemic approach, without evidence, without analysis. Everything is dumped in one heap and looking at this heap a conclusion is made - America is EVIL. I don’t argue about the conclusion. And the rest .... You read, you try to catch something for yourself, and you can't analyze something about it. Before making a "Verdict" need FACTS, PROOF. And in the article half are just RUMORS, which are not confirmed.
    1. +6
      8 September 2016 09: 16
      Quote: alexej123
      Before making a "Verdict" need FACTS, PROOF.

      "need FACTS" And "PROOF OF"- They are just SEA!
      Another thing is that the availability of these FACTS and EVIDENCE leaves much to be desired. They really are and many of them are really familiar to me. But how to ensure their widest availability? Do you have any suggestions on this? Andrei Fursov himself, as a professor at MGIMO, having a doctoral dissertation, has increased opportunities in this regard, which, unfortunately, the bulk of ordinary people cannot afford. Keep in mind that the article is very, very compressed, the format of VO, and the volume of evidence required in this case, does not allow for each paragraph of the article to bring the necessary amount of evidence base. Unfortunately, in this case, it is better to trust the authority of the author himself, who has a fairly high scientific authority, and not only in our country. Try looking for details in other sources or in numerous lectures and books of the author, too.
      1. 0
        8 September 2016 11: 28
        Vyacheslav, what you are talking about is not facts - this is a hypothesis. Yes, justified, yes, requiring study. Roughly speaking, a conclusion is made based on "indirect" ones.
      2. 0
        8 September 2016 11: 32
        And I didn't understand why "unfortunately"? I am a person, all people tend to be wrong. I do not pretend to be the "last resort". I expressed my opinion regarding the posted material. I expressed it in the correct form.
  7. +2
    8 September 2016 09: 40
    Quote: Gormengast
    But in order to kill thousands of its citizens on its territory - in my opinion, no

    Such a belief is simply amazing, given the history of the United States and the Anglo-Saxons in general))) The well-known and recognized by the British fact of "substituting" their city for bombing by the Germans during WWII, so that they would not suspect disclosing their encryption codes to help you)
    1. +1
      8 September 2016 12: 02
      It's not about history. It must be taken into account that the Amer pain threshold, from the time of Vietnam, has monstrously decreased. Now, dozens of victims are a national catastrophe.

      In general, it seems to me that if 50+ killed in the club sodomites laughing were the work of the authorities, then the Democrats (now in power) would have no chance of electing Clinton, and Obama would be impeached.

      Killed nigga laughing - this is one (racism in the USA is almost official), and the killed sodomite is another; Sodomites are very influential. laughing
  8. +10
    8 September 2016 10: 09
    Quote: venaya
    Research on this subject is already quite a lot.




    Special correspondent of September 11
    Film by Andrei Medvedev.
    11 years have passed since the terrorist attacks that occurred in America on September 2001 of 15.

    Immediately after the attacks, the US government took decisive action. A military operation began in Afghanistan. There is only one circumstance. The US invasion of Afghanistan was not a direct response to the events of 11 September. A week before the attack - on 4 of September - the draft of the upcoming military operation, prepared in August by the country's defense minister Donald Rumsfeld, was put on the table of President George W. Bush.

    Shortly after September 11, the neocons declared that the United States was a real new empire. And this is the empire of Good. And that they will enforce their will and spread freedom and democracy. Using the September 11 as an argument, the United States convinced its citizens that Saddam Hussein was affiliated with Al Qaeda, that he was financing terrorists, that he was involved in the September 11 attacks.

    In 2003, the United States began bombing Iraq, although a plan for redivision of the world was ready in advance. Neocons and their role in the US government. Neocons are a political group that, since Reagan, has advocated for a tough foreign policy, for the promotion of democracy that will help the United States establish itself as the only world leader.
    On 10 of September 2001, the day before the attacks, Rumsfield delivered a speech. It was said that he sees as his main goal the maximum privatization of the defense sphere. Logistics support, construction, even the very conduct of war and reconnaissance - in all this, private contractors should be used as widely as possible.

    Privatization of war and the military-industrial complex of America.
    Non-conservatives, closely associated with military corporations since the Cold War, turned the war into a super-profitable business. Only one private military contractor company made 44 billion dollars in Afghanistan and Iraq by 2014 year. Security privatization has affected America itself. Hundreds of private companies received orders from the National Security Agency for wiretapping of citizens, from the FBI - for surveillance, from the Pentagon - for the preparation of various files and data collection. The century in which the concepts of democracy and freedom were the personification of America, ended exactly 11 September 2001 year.

    What is the instrumentalization of 11 September?
    Planes crashing into towers.
    Test tube in the hands of Colin Powell.
    A chemical attack near Damascus, allegedly committed by the forces of the tyrant Assad.
    Snipers shooting people on the Kiev Maidan.
    The Malaysian Boeing, shot down near Donetsk, could continue this chain. Become the same tool. Against Russia. If I fell on the territory of the Rostov region.

    Today, any day in any country in the world can turn into 11 September.
  9. 0
    8 September 2016 11: 17
    An exceptional nation, the hegemon of evil. angry
    1. +4
      8 September 2016 11: 41
      A very correct article, personally, I have no doubt at all that the events of September 11 are a planned action by the CIA of the Mossad and the terrorists fired by them to create an occasion to crush countries and governments loyally related to Russia and create new centers of instability on our borders.
      And now in Syria, we see a continuation of this vile bunch of the American and Israeli regime and bandits and murderers from ISIS and other terrorist groups that are trying to destroy this republic with all their might.
      Twin towers blew up inside
  10. +2
    8 September 2016 12: 20
    All in one heap. Conspiracy therapists in ecstasy. It is quite possible provocations of special services. No one denies this. But the author mixed vinaigrette and plus made a lot of inaccuracies in the text. This invalidated the whole idea. There is no trust in such a penny.
  11. 0
    8 September 2016 12: 47
    Nuance, qui bono - literally "it's good"; but "who benefits" will be qui prodest ...
    The author of the article apparently did not familiarize himself with the Latin translation ...
  12. +3
    8 September 2016 13: 09
    What "aircraft carrier" (!) That shot down the Iranian Boeing (!) In 1988 is the article talking about? On July 3, 1988, the American cruiser Vincennes (of the Ticonderoga class) under the command of Captain 1st Rank William Rogers shot down an Iranian civilian Airbus A300 aircraft with two guided missiles. The author, there are a lot of inaccuracies, before uploading, check and learn the materiel))
  13. +3
    8 September 2016 13: 36
    again some conspiracy thesis. About pearl harbor so generally laugh. Maybe they were still Americans on repainted planes?
  14. +3
    8 September 2016 14: 06
    Quote: RiON
    In general, he is ready to refer even to the protocols of the Zionist sages to prove that America is bad and the Jews are to blame.

    And what do you RiON have any evidence that the United States is good and the Jews are not at fault for these events?
    If you have such facts, write an article and we will all read it with pleasure. But most likely you don’t have anything, and you just come out with anger trying to somehow ward off your fellow Jews and your beloved States from the provocation that they organized on September 11 to unleash another series of wars on our planet.
  15. +4
    8 September 2016 18: 08
    Quote: RiON
    Why? Because they did not explode. The explosion on the floor looks very, very different.

    Looks like you are a major specialist in explosions inside houses if it’s not difficult for you to tell how this happens, but rather show it.
    And then your statements are more like another verbiage.
    Quote: RiON
    Why the hell is it, if a test tube with white powder goes off for proof? Presented - and calmly infiltrated even into Afghanistan, even into Brazil.

    Yes, it doesn’t work out so not all the same gullible as you are RiON lol For example, the Prime Minister of the Israeli regime Netanyahu also painted beautiful pictures and told from the UN rostrum which Iran is bad, but no one went to fight against Tehran and the sanctions against it were canceled


    Quote: RiON
    Here is a home hamster sitting at home at the keyboard and posting comments and scolding me as a liberal. He is not fit for life in the world around him, he is afraid of him and does not go out into the street without a serious reason. What for? There are hooligans, gopniks and a million different dangers. Scary, in short.

    Just now, this hamster sees that the USA is telling the truth about the love of his life and the Jews are telling the truth in righteous anger, trying to whitewash these same USA and these very Jews.
    It is clear that the hamster is ready to justify provocateurs and murderers by any means and means, because by doing so he also justifies his worldview.
    Quote: RiON
    But there is an objective point of view and there is a subjective one. Subjective trolling is dull, like an owl stretched over a globe. But objectively: there are no good nations and no bad ones. There are strong and weak. Strong is everything. Weak - nothing. Jews have nothing to do with it, such is life. Dixi.

    Oh, you just don’t need to build a superman out of yourself, or else it becomes funny and it smells like Nazism lol
    Quote: RiON
    And about the provocations - see my post above. Why all these difficulties if a test tube with white powder is used as evidence?

    This is nonsense and not UN evidence, despite the test tube with detergent that shocked Powell, it did not authorize the start of the war against Iraq in 2003 and then the United States and its satellites attacked Iraq on their own.
    That is, even the fact that the CIA and Mossad staged on September 11, 2001 in the United States by blowing up the towers of a shopping center could not convince anyone of Iraq's guilt, well, of course, except for the various stubborn fanatics of these newest superhumans.
  16. +1
    8 September 2016 22: 34
    Absolutely stupid analysis in the style of the "world conspiracy of Jews and the United States"
    Here the author writes that the Americans allegedly allowed the bombing of Pearl Harbor. But it’s somehow strange that during the attack, the United States lost the best ships in the Pacific. Did the Americans make such sacrifices? But they could have arranged a provocation like in Vietnam.
    Experts concluded that the Japanese torpedoes were too outdated and weak to break through the Arizona armor. Something else happened. Most likely, there was an explosion at Arizona itself

    Not true. The Japanese had quite modern torpedoes.
    The September 11 attacks are also a lie. The official version quite clearly explained everything. True, there are those who see the "conspiracy" everywhere.
    By the way. Our president Putin personally said that the September 11 attacks were organized by terrorists.
    1. +1
      9 September 2016 18: 47
      EEE .. according to Wikipedia, it wasn't torpedoes that hit Arizona, but bombs, in a powder magazine. They beat me not on the side, but from above, where the armor was thinner. As if, as long as I remember, even Igor Mozheiko (aka Kir Bulychev) wrote about it. The same moment is in the movie "Pearl Harbor".
  17. +2
    9 September 2016 02: 20
    Quote: Gormengast
    If there was a conspiracy, the United States would long ago recognize the Russian Crimea and there would be no sanctions.

    Yeah of course. And they would also give a prize and confer the title of Hero of America.
    In fact, do not confuse soft with warm. The United States has a policy of dominating the world and the appearance of a new player there, to put it mildly, is not welcome. Therefore, no, the most arrogant sabotage of US intelligence, would not give Russia any advantage in gaining power over the Crimea, which the US Armed Forces needed.
  18. 0
    14 September 2016 19: 05
    Yes, there are many inaccuracies and errors in the article, well, the author was in a hurry, but the meaning is clear, those who are interested can study each mentioned episode on their own. As for the 911 itself, there are several versions of what happened, the main thing is that the official one does not stand up to criticism, from the word at all. There is a lot of material, Google is not a problem. The article does not mention that immediately before the "terrorist attack", the WTC was undergoing reconstruction, who is interested, find out what kind of office was involved in this and who owns it, hold on to the chair. This will explain how the required amount of charges for controlled demolition got into the buildings and was installed, and a huge pyroclastic cloud (and dust analysis was done) fired and the applied composition, termite. There was a link to the film above, look carefully from 24:30, even with a low-quality video, multiple flashes at the beginning and the process of "falling" are clearly distinguishable. On other rollers you can see, literally, the melt splashing out. Well, if this is not enough to suspect something was wrong, you can still try to imagine a 600x400 beam with a wall thickness of 60mm, made of special certified steel, which was thrown along an aluminum plane at a speed of 800 km, there are really strong engines and struts, the rest is composites and aluminum. Not to mention the fact that the designers themselves say that the structure is designed to withstand an aircraft strike. And comrade. Silverstein in general directly said that the 7ka was demolished on purpose, due to the threat of collapse, although it was not seriously damaged. But such demolitions are being prepared for months, and not in five hours, he himself was burned.