The first batch of Mi-38 helicopters for the Ministry of Defense will range from 10-ti to 20 units

33
The contract for the supply of Russian military helicopters Mi-38 will be signed in 2016 or 2017 g. The first batch will be from 10-tee to 20 machines, reports MIC with reference to the deputy general director of the holding company "Helicopters of Russia" (BP) Alexander Shcherbinin.





“Regarding the number and technical appearance of the helicopters, we can say that the“ leader ”party will make from a technical performance of 10 to 20, based on the production Mi-38 helicopter with a serious enough refinement of it to the requirements of the Ministry of Defense of Russia”,
said Sherbinin.

He noted that currently "there are active consultations with the Ministry of Defense to determine the appearance of the vehicle and the number of helicopters of this class", which can be delivered to the VKS.

“During 2016-2017, it is planned to sign a corresponding supply agreement. The exact date depends on the decision of the military department. We are ready for this at any time, ”the deputy general director added.

Earlier, the holding stated that the Ministry of Defense will become the first customer of the Mi-38, and that "the decision on the procedure and timing for the arrival of new vehicles to the troops has already been made." At the same time, Deputy Defense Minister Borisov said that a contract with BP could be signed at 2017 g, serial deliveries of vehicles would begin at 2018.

Help newspaper: “Mi-38 - multi-purpose helicopter, which can be used to transport passengers and cargo, as a search and rescue, like a flying hospital. This car occupies a niche between the representatives of the Mi-8 / 17 family and the heavy Mi-26. The payload of the Mi-38 is five to six tons; the helicopter can carry up to 30 people. ”
  • en.wikipedia.org
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    6 September 2016 11: 23
    I thought it would be a lighter class car than the Mi-8. And it’s like that — between the Mi-8 and the Mi-26! So there is a need.
  2. +7
    6 September 2016 11: 24
    10-20 Mi-38 cars, the figure is somehow strange, not a squadron. So I understand that they will pass the full stage of military tests. I wish them good luck, since their fate largely depends on this.
    1. +3
      6 September 2016 11: 47
      Most likely they will be sent 2-3 units each, to various climatic zones, and then, according to the results of operation, some modifications will probably be made and the second batch will already be sufficient to form several squadrons.
    2. +4
      6 September 2016 13: 19
      Very interesting interview.
      Mr. Shcherbin is ready to sign a supply agreement. At the same time, "there are active consultations with the Ministry of Defense to determine the appearance of the machine." That is, the appearance of the car is not defined. Maybe the Defense Ministry will want there to be a VIP salon for 50 people, transport 2 Armats, and there was also a laser cannon below. Well, just how is he ready to supply now what he does not know?
      That is, I don’t know what to deliver yet, I don’t know how it will look at all, but I’m ready to deliver it now. Another talking head.
      1. +1
        6 September 2016 15: 13
        I believe that when speaking about the appearance of the car, they mean in particular, for example, a hatch at the rear, doors on both sides of the cabin, whether there will be increased fuel tanks or standard ones, what kind of suspension will be for armaments, etc.
        1. +1
          6 September 2016 15: 30
          Well, this is a change in design.
          And anything can be requested there, it is such a gimp and tug of war, desire and opportunity.
          Then, if it will be necessary to install additional equipment, then this is generally a separate issue, it is necessary to check it, test it, it will take some time.
          Not to mention the subcontractors, who will supply the equipment, maybe they will say that they are not ready to supply it (loading under other contracts), maybe they will not converge at the price and all this will last for some time, etc., etc.
  3. +2
    6 September 2016 11: 25
    Very interesting machine. I would like to know the performance characteristics and capacity.
    1. +5
      6 September 2016 13: 52
      Aircraft performance
      Cruising speed
      280 - 290 km / h
      Flight range with cargo weighing 3 000 kg - 900 km
      Flight range with cargo 5 000kg - 420 km
      Range with additional
      2700kg fuel tanks and cargo - 1200 km
      Service ceiling 5 900 m
      Static ceiling hanging outside the zone of influence of the earth 3 750 m
      Mass characteristics
      Max. take-off weight 15 600 kg
      Maximum take-off weight with external load 16200 kg
      Max. payload in transport cab Up to 5 tons
      Max. payload on external load suspension Up to 6 tons
      Power point
      Gas turbine engines 2xTV7-117В (OJSC Klimov)
      Takeoff Power 2 500 HP
      Emergency Power 3 750 HP
      Cabin dimensions
      Floor length 7000 mm
      Width 2 360 mm
      Height 1 840 mm
      Volume 29,5 m3
      1-3 helicopter crew
      Capacity
      Passengers (economy class) up to 30
      VIP lounge up to 12 passengers
  4. +1
    6 September 2016 11: 41
    Generals to hunt to carry?
  5. +1
    6 September 2016 11: 47
    More aircraft, good and different!
  6. +6
    6 September 2016 11: 49
    They write: "... This machine occupies a niche between the representatives of the Mi-8/17 family and the heavy Mi-26." And I think that over time this helicopter will completely replace the Mi-8. It is impractical to keep the old Mi-8 along with the new Mi-38. "Eight" is not much smaller in size, which means that the "38th" can also be used there. And the capacity of "38" is more. Question: so what the fuck goat button accordion? Besides, old ...
  7. +2
    6 September 2016 12: 04
    Good development of the Mi-8/17 line. That would have achieved the same popularity (and worldwide sales!).
  8. +9
    6 September 2016 12: 05
    Quote: Waraga
    They write: "... This machine occupies a niche between the representatives of the Mi-8/17 family and the heavy Mi-26." And I think that over time this helicopter will completely replace the Mi-8. It is impractical to keep the old Mi-8 along with the new Mi-38. "Eight" is not much smaller in size, which means that the "38th" can also be used there. And the capacity of "38" is more. Question: so what the fuck goat button accordion? Besides, old ...

    Well, actually the 8 best helicopter in its class today :) Who told you that it is out of date?
    Show at least one other helicopter that would equal 8-ke in terms of performance ... They simply do not exist.
    So 8 more will survive with you. The car is just amazingly successful!
    1. +2
      6 September 2016 12: 20
      The eight keep on their reliability and low price. For commercial use, the cost of maintenance, fuel, lower comm load eats up all the advantages of the Mi-8. It is necessary to change the generation of technology in time.
      1. +6
        6 September 2016 13: 21
        The eight keep on their reliability and low price.


        It rests on an amazingly successful choice of airframe mass-dimensional characteristics and very successful TV3-117 engines. When the "teshki" was upgraded to "mt", it became "more volatile" than a twenty-four. And 30 fighters and "MT" easily lifted, even in the mountains, and not at sea level. Eh, youth ...
        1. +1
          7 September 2016 09: 49
          I had the opportunity to serve in military unit 2305 (7 UAE SVPO). So in the conditions of Chukotka, a car is better than 8 than hard to imagine. Beautiful, reliable car. I can’t imagine what other helicopter could withstand such difficult operating conditions. And in a blizzard and in frost, it is necessary to guard the border. And the Mi-8 is the best machine for this.
  9. +4
    6 September 2016 12: 12
    The upgraded Mi-8 is the main enemy of this machine. The engines are the same, the blades are the same, the gearbox I don’t know, and the price is two times lower .... And in the army he will not be able to replace the Mi-8 in the form of a transport-combat one, too big ....
  10. 0
    6 September 2016 12: 17
    We need a Ka-60/62 machine and then the Mi-38 will fit well into the line of helicopters: Ansat / Ka-226 - Ka-60/62 - Mi-38-Mi-26. And still a good domestic analogue of Robinson with and without a turbine.
  11. +4
    6 September 2016 12: 18
    Am I the only one jarred by the Euromile inscription? Still want to be the euro?
    1. +1
      6 September 2016 12: 23
      This is a unit in Israel. I need to ask the Professor ...
  12. +2
    6 September 2016 12: 27
    "Euromil" laughing
  13. +2
    6 September 2016 12: 51
    Is Euromile a tribute to the West? The euro prefix is ​​shoved wherever it gets, from building materials to gasoline. As we love Europa, it turns out.
    1. +1
      6 September 2016 14: 22
      I agree. For some reason, "Africa" ​​or "Asia" does not presume to add. But it would be original and attractive: "Why is it exactly SUCH a prefix, and not the previous one? It will be necessary to find out better." And b to go ...
  14. +2
    6 September 2016 12: 57
    Quote: Zaurbek
    The eight keep on their reliability and low price. For commercial use, the cost of maintenance, fuel, lower comm load eats up all the advantages of the Mi-8. It is necessary to change the generation of technology in time.

    You brought the most important indicators for army equipment. That’s why the 8 will fly for a very long time :) Mi-38 is more a commercial project than a military one, but God forbid that this helicopter finds its place in our army. I agree that the development should be constant and it’s great that they launch a new helicopter. But however, I assure you that the 38th will not be a full replacement for 8-ke in the near future. Whether you like it or not. I think that they will coexist in parallel.
    1. +1
      6 September 2016 13: 16
      Army sales are not a sign of model success. A good business needs civilian sales and service. And this is a minimum of + 50% of sales, the currency in the budget, the currency at the enterprise, the ability of the enterprise to buy new equipment, licenses for models and assemblies in the open market. What would later be used, including in the production of new military models.
      1. 0
        7 September 2016 09: 42
        In this case, we are talking about delivery to the army :)
      2. 0
        7 September 2016 09: 43
        In this case, we are talking about delivery to the army :)
        1. 0
          8 September 2016 12: 34
          Here it is just necessary to move away from such a moment. Mi-8, by the way, and in the civilian world is very successful. But old.
  15. +7
    6 September 2016 13: 59
    Quote: Vadim12
    Is Euromile a tribute to the West?

    The EURO prefix in the name EUROMIL from the name of the helicopter engineering company EUROCOPTER with which this helicopter was originally developed, in particular, it had imported engines and part of the equipment.
    In 1994, the Moscow and Kazan Helicopter Plants, the Plant im. V. Ya. Klimova and Eurocopter established the Euromil joint venture. The partners participated in the project on a risk-sharing basis, transferring the functions of the main executor of the program to Euromil. Eurocopter took over the creation of avionics for the Mi-38, was supposed to advise Russians on certification and deal with sales of the helicopter abroad.
  16. 0
    6 September 2016 23: 35
    Good news.
  17. 0
    7 September 2016 09: 11
    Great. good
  18. snc
    0
    7 September 2016 11: 30
    This machine occupies a niche between representatives of the Mi-8/17 family and the heavy Mi-26

    How do zhurnalyugi got this stupidity to repeat. Mi-38 is a direct replacement for Mi-8. To take a place between the Mi-8 and the Mi-26, we need a payload of 10-12 tons. Previously, we had the Mi-6, now we have nothing in this class.
  19. +2
    7 September 2016 15: 34
    Either rain, or snow, or it will be, or not. Count how many such empty news since the year 11, at least .... The content is approaching zero in terms and quantity.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"