"Typhoon Airborne" will be the first in the world landed MRAP

63
Airborne troops in the coming years, expects large-scale rearmament. So, along with tracked armored vehicles, the paratroopers will receive Tiger special-purpose armored vehicles and a Typhoon-VDV KamAZ-4386 armored vehicles, writes Messenger of Mordovia.

"Typhoon Airborne" will be the first in the world landed MRAP




“These“ Typhoons ”will become a truly new word in the development of the so-called MRAP - until the advent of the Russian car, no country in the world had armored vehicles that were landed and protected from explosions and ambushes from ambushes,” the publication says.

Another innovation is the appearance on the KamAZ-4386 vehicles of a combat uninhabited module with an 30-mm cannon and a machine gun of the 7,62 caliber.

“As a result, in terms of firepower, this machine will be equal to the BMD-2. The newest fire control system thanks to the thermal imager will effectively destroy various targets day and night, ”writes“ Herald ”.



According to experts, "Typhoon-Airborne", first of all, will be replaced by existing UAZ airborne assault brigades, which are not entirely suitable for the Airborne Forces "land" BMP-2 and the second generation airborne combat vehicles, ”concludes the publication .
  • 2004 Courage
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    5 September 2016 12: 43
    Yes, such a module for the airborne forces on the car will definitely come in handy. And they pushed him onto the tiger, a serious thing in a "jeep" is a good help in battle. The Americans did not use cannon armament for the Hamer. It is clear that it is stupid to compare it with a hamer, but as for me, the dimensions are similar. But we did it and it pleases.
    1. +7
      5 September 2016 13: 16
      Radomir
      The Americans didn’t use cannon weapons for the Hamer. It is clear that comparing with a hamer is stupid, but as for me the dimensions are similar. But it turned out and it pleases us.

      HMMWV or Humvee - Weight: 2676 kg, Gross Weight: 4672 kg, Max. speed: 88 km / h (55 mph ... in the M-1114 modification -4700 kg
      Tiger: Weight: 6400 kg, Gross weight: 7600 kg (SPM-2), Max. speed: 160 km / h ...
      And what is there to compare? Cars of different classes and armor protection.
      1. +5
        5 September 2016 14: 14
        And Americans do not know how to parachute Hummer with a parachute.
        crying
        In the last exercises, three Hummers were defeated due to a clipping of a parachute line.
      2. +2
        6 September 2016 01: 32
        [quote] Humvee - Weight: 2676 kg, Gross Weight: 4672 kg, Max. speed: 88km/h /quote]
        [quote] Tiger: Weight: 6400 kg, Gross weight: 7600 kg (SPM-2), Max. speed: 160 km / h .. [/ quote] [quote] [/ quote]

        This Tiger 160km / h can? )) Does the Humvee mean only 88km / h? As always, you are pleased with your objectivity. wassat wassat
      3. 0
        6 September 2016 01: 32
        [quote] Humvee - Weight: 2676 kg, Gross Weight: 4672 kg, Max. speed: 88km/h /quote]
        [quote] Tiger: Weight: 6400 kg, Gross weight: 7600 kg (SPM-2), Max. speed: 160 km / h .. [/ quote] [quote] [/ quote]

        This Tiger 160km / h can? )) Does the Humvee mean only 88km / h? As always, you are pleased with your objectivity. wassat wassat
        1. 0
          7 September 2016 00: 36
          It is worth recognizing that manufacturers in any case do not declare characteristics for specific options that are comparable in weight. Modern versions of HMMWV make up to 113 km / h with a gross weight of up to 4672 kg (reinforced armored version of the M-1114), Tigers - up to 160 km / h with a gross weight of up to 7600 — 7800 kg (GAZ-233036 / СПМ-2, AMN-233114). Perhaps GM gives the speed characteristic of the heaviest version, and the AMZ - the base chassis (most likely the civilian GAZ-3121 "Tiger-2": weight - 3500 kg, engine, for example, Cummins B205 with an output of 205 hp). For heavy military (STS / ASN / AMN) variants with a gross weight of up to 7800 kg (AMN-233114 Tiger-M), a maximum speed of the order of 120 km / h is always indicated.
    2. +1
      5 September 2016 21: 18
      Well, the author went too far, the Hamers in the version of therapists won the NATO troops a month ago in Europe they landed, though one plopped)) but this is definitely not the first and only airborne car in the world.
  2. +8
    5 September 2016 12: 45
    A good machine, but a rubber move is more of a drawback than a virtue: patency is worse and rubber vulnerability is higher (and I don’t need to talk about pumping, no pumping will help if the tires are in pieces).
    1. +10
      5 September 2016 12: 59
      Purely a secret.
      There, tires are never filled with air.
      1. +1
        5 September 2016 13: 00
        With what? Or where to read?)
        1. 0
          6 September 2016 06: 15
          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D1%83%D1%81%
          D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA
          possibly sponge rubber
    2. +3
      5 September 2016 13: 00
      (and I don’t need to talk about swap, no swapping will help if the tires are in shreds).

      This is MRAP and therefore only wheels!
      And pumping is not the main way to keep the mobility of wheeled vehicles!
    3. +4
      5 September 2016 16: 01
      the wheeled one is better in my opinion, in Omsk they don’t have time to cook mechans, and those who come from there are scary dudes with whom they are scared on one hectare. as there are more people, you can choose a normal carrier. Yes, and all manner of maneuvers behi and on the road more stable.
  3. +3
    5 September 2016 13: 02
    Quote: Monos
    rubber vulnerability higher

    But the speed is higher, which means time, which is extremely important in a war! On the flat terrain is the thing.
  4. +3
    5 September 2016 13: 02
    Quote: Monos
    A good machine, but a rubber move is more of a drawback than a virtue: patency is worse and rubber vulnerability is higher (and I don’t need to talk about pumping, no pumping will help if the tires are in pieces).

    But what about the rubber-powered APCs used in combined arms combat?
    1. +7
      5 September 2016 13: 26
      But what about the rubber-powered APCs used in combined arms combat?


      The armored personnel carrier can be withdrawn from the combined arms battle, the airborne forces have a different specificity. For them, the loss of mobility means the loss of "armor".
      1. +3
        5 September 2016 13: 37
        For them, the loss of mobility means the loss of "armor".

        For this purpose, and MRAP in tires, the ruggedized inserts of the chances of maintaining mobility during blasting are higher than those of tracked vehicles.
        1. +4
          5 September 2016 14: 46
          Airborne troops in the coming years expects large-scale rearmament.

          I have been hearing this fable for over 10 years. And nothing has changed... hi
      2. 0
        6 September 2016 12: 10
        If BMD breaks the caterpillar, then it will become. If the armored personnel carrier tears off the wheel, it will retain mobility.
        1. 0
          6 September 2016 13: 15
          The BTR has 8 wheels in the Typhoon 2, even if it tears off a couple, it crawls out. And Khan’s tafuna ...
          1. 0
            6 September 2016 22: 26
            It will creep back, but no BMD.
  5. +5
    5 September 2016 13: 07
    Before the advent of the Russian car, not a single country in the world had armored vehicles that were landing and protected from explosions and attacks from ambushes

    Cretinism rolls over ... MRAPs are vehicles for transporting military vehicles in a guerrilla warfare. Those. it moves through its territory on which terrorist sabotage is possible. Why the heck to drop them and where? The landing party usually lands on enemy territory, where are the partisans acting against the landing? Did brains flow out?
    1. avt
      +8
      5 September 2016 13: 47
      Cretinism rolls over ... In general, the brain flowed ..
      From the fact that they did not bother to get acquainted with the operations that the Airborne Forces carried out, starting with the presence in the former Yugoslavia and Kosovo in particular, when Yevkurov entered Pristina in the 80s, ending with the Crimean epic and now in Syria. The shaman wants to have an airmobile version of the wheeled vehicle with the possibility of parachute release instead of the BTR-80, he assembles a kit for operational transfer until a heavy army train is brought up. The logic is clear and practical - really strengthening the airborne forces, they also need a self-propelled artillery on the basis of "VIENNA" and there will be complete happiness.
      1. +2
        5 September 2016 13: 50
        From the above, where was the parachute landing used? Pristina, Crimea, Syria?
        1. avt
          +4
          5 September 2016 14: 46
          From the above, where was the parachute landing used? Pristina, Crimea, Syria?
          Of the above my
          The shaman wants to have a wheeled version of the wheeled vehicle instead of the BTR-80, with the possibility of a parachute throw,
          Today it wasn’t needed, but if tomorrow you need to throw it away where there is no airfield at all capable of receiving the same IL-76 ??? Will be for
          Cretinism rolls over ...
          boil the brain - why not foresee?
      2. 0
        5 September 2016 13: 50
        From the above, where was the parachute landing used? Pristina, Crimea, Syria?
      3. 0
        5 September 2016 18: 30
        And can you find out in Crimea who and when they parachuted? And in what year then? If the events of 2014, then the more detailed request!
    2. +3
      5 September 2016 16: 06
      Yes, we have the last years of the Airborne Forces in the main parachute way and always parachute with technology. but the fact that for 10 years people on mines was undermined is as if normal.
      BMD is, as it were, also not a death star, it means it can be dropped. but MRAP, by no means, because he shoots current at partisans.
    3. 0
      6 September 2016 12: 13
      Have you heard about Afghanistan, heard there the Airborne Forces fought, heard that they were not dropped from the plane?
  6. +5
    5 September 2016 13: 32
    If the Airborne Forces were armed with "Mriya", Tu225, then they would definitely throw "Armata" off them!
    1. 0
      6 September 2016 23: 53
      Mriya is An, not Tu.
  7. +1
    5 September 2016 14: 07
    So what? In IL-76 two pieces fit like nice. In battle - a good help.
    1. 0
      6 September 2016 23: 54
      They will not fit in and will not carry IL-76 even 2 T-90 in weight, not to mention Armata.
    2. 0
      6 September 2016 23: 54
      They will not fit in and will not carry IL-76 even 2 T-90 in weight, not to mention Armata.
  8. 0
    5 September 2016 15: 25
    Good cars, but how good the war will show. Although the fact that the native Army is not only re-equipped but also changed into new wheels is openly pleasing
  9. +1
    5 September 2016 16: 05
    An armored jeep is better than a UAZ fitted with body armor. And the combat module is good! If not deep rivers, then it’s quite possible to fight this.
  10. 0
    5 September 2016 18: 31
    Florizel,
    Quote: Florizel
    How? war? okstits;) If you imagine that once again Get up the country is huge, then unfortunately it seems getting up the country, but in turn for tickets for trains / parades / planes, unfortunately ...
    Well, if you imagine the ratio of economic and military potentials, in general - a pipe.

    I’m so personally for any "seething", except for a hunger strike, but I know one thing for a long time, Russia is always not ready for war (even when it prepares), It will always win a global war (but not by the army but by the militia), in short, forward to Berlin.

    The problem is that the life and future of the whole elite is not here but just there, I do not believe in bees against honey ...

    There is such a concept of "threatened period" - this is when everyone already knows for sure that the war is about to begin and are feverishly preparing for it, pretending to each other that nothing special is happening.
    Someone will really pick up the plague, someone will urgently pull relatives from abroad. Those who decide to blame the overpriced will also not be envied - they will dispossess them, according to the laws of the war, how to give.
    In the meantime, bunks will be brought into the bomb shelters, liable for military service will be drafted into the army, and the Airborne Forces will be preparing to seize the arms depots in the countries of the Russophobian belt.
    Indeed, apparently, the main decision to be taken at the NATO summit is the deployment of additional troops near Russian borders. The number of a thousand people is not a battalion (formally, the battalion is much smaller), but it closely resembles the echelon of forward-based formations in the United States, said Konstantin Sivkov, chairman of the Union of Russian Geopolitics.

    "Probably, with this thousand people there will be a thousand units of armored vehicles and various weapons. Simply put, in our terminology, this is a framed unit. They contain equipment, store it and send it to important areas. If it is necessary to deploy a group, there within 2-3 days. they transfer personnel, about 12-15 thousand people, who sit on this equipment, receive ammunition and act. And we get a framed division: mechanized or armored, "he said in a conversation with Nakanune.RU.

    -http: //www.nakanune.ru/news/2016/07/06/22440817/
    # sthash.CzCtt35y.dpuf
  11. +2
    6 September 2016 00: 45
    Quote: mishaia_23
    Hummer

    Dear readers, HMMWV (Hamvi) is a military machine, and Hammer (civil). Do not confuse two completely different cars
    1. 0
      7 September 2016 00: 15
      That’s how it is, only they are completely different, like UAZ-469 and UAZ-469Б, like UAZ-3151 and UAZ-31512 - different configurations of one machine for different applications.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"