Military Review

Analysts: Sweden’s entry into NATO will keep Russia from seizing the Baltic countries

66
NATO membership will not solve all of Sweden’s defense problems, but will keep "aggressive" Russia from attacking the Baltic countries, writes Delphi with reference to the report prepared by the order of the Swedish government.


Analysts: Sweden’s entry into NATO will keep Russia from seizing the Baltic countries


“The authors of the report do not have a specific position on the long-discussed issue of the possible accession of Sweden, traditionally adhering to neutrality, in NATO, however, they analyze possible pros and cons of membership in the alliance,” the newspaper writes.

According to the authors of the report, in the summer of 2015, the center-left government “instructed diplomat Christer Bringheus to evaluate Sweden’s military cooperation with various countries, and he concluded that NATO membership would clarify how Sweden would act in the event of a conflict in the Baltic region - the chances of containing the conflict would increase. ”

The document "denies the possibility of Russia attacking Sweden itself, however, the involvement of Sweden in the conflict after the Russian attack on Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia is mentioned as the most realistic scenario," Delfi writes.

Analysts suggest that “Russia can take over the Baltic countries in a few days, and then wants to deploy air defense systems in Sweden, for example, Gotland, to prevent flights aviation NATO over the Baltic Sea. ”

In this case, Sweden will need outside help, but the Americans "will need at least three weeks to arrive at the scene," the report says.

The document also says that if Sweden wanted to, NATO would of course accept it into its ranks (the accession procedure would take from 12 to 15 months), but this step will cause a political crisis in relations with Moscow, “the scale of which difficult to evaluate. " At the same time, he, “most likely, will be limited to political rhetoric and military threats,” the authors believe.
Photos used:
AFP / Scanpix
66 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. kotvov
    kotvov 5 September 2016 11: 39
    +10
    idiocy blooms wildly.
    1. Evil543
      Evil543 5 September 2016 11: 42
      +13
      Prepare the ground to enter into nature. Any excuses are used. They need this Baltic as a dog’s fifth leg.
      1. uskrabut
        uskrabut 5 September 2016 13: 01
        +6
        Anecdote in the topic:
        “Kum, why don't you have a door on your toilet?”
        - And what is there to take?
    2. vovanpain
      vovanpain 5 September 2016 11: 51
      +15
      Membership in NATO will not solve all of Sweden’s defense problems, but it will deter “aggressive” Russia from attacking the Baltic countries, Delfi writes referring to a report commissioned by the Swedish government.
      Lord, you are already tired of commenting on the nonsense of Western schizophrenics, they need the Baltic states like a dog's fifth leg, they just need to drag Sweden and Finland into NATO and place mattress military bases. To gain control over the Baltic. And then "aggressive" Russia, the trick is that these sproeaters are of no interest to either Russia or the Swedes. Yes
      1. captain
        captain 5 September 2016 18: 22
        +1
        So it seems that the Swedes have already entered once, though I don’t remember where, but I know for sure that everything ended on 21 on June 1709 near Poltava and Karl flew to Turkey. And now Erdogan may not accept the Swedes. Sweden is aging, memory is losing. In 1721 they lost the Baltic states, in 1809 Finland. True, then the compassionate Bolsheviks released and forgave everything, but the Bolsheviks are no longer in power. The history of Crimea did not teach anything.
      2. vyinemeynen
        vyinemeynen 6 September 2016 06: 39
        0
        Analysts suggest that "Russia may seize the Baltic states within a few days and then will want to deploy air defense systems on Swedish territory, for example, Gotland, in order to prevent NATO flights over the Baltic Sea."

        Why is it worse in Gotland than in Kaliningrad, and after all it has already been "captured"!
        Or ANALYTICS just forgot about him?
    3. dumpy15
      dumpy15 5 September 2016 12: 28
      +14
      What prevents Swedes from continuing to live satisfyingly and calmly?
      What is Russia stopping them today?
      An obvious threat to Sweden is the nimble sperm of Middle Eastern immigrants. IMHO
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 5 September 2016 13: 20
        +2
        Quote: vovanpain
        they need the Baltic states like a dog’s fifth leg, they just need to draw Sweden and Finland into NATO and place mattress military bases in order to gain control of the Baltic.

        About the control over the Baltic, I agree, but about the Baltic states no.
        The Baltic states are a convenient balcony to our northwestern region. Even without the permanent deployment of long-range strike complexes, the NATO people are extremely uncomfortable sitting there penetrating the RLpole hundreds of kilometers inland into our territory. In addition, Prib. looming menacingly over the Kaliningrad UR.
        1. Yuri Y.
          Yuri Y. 5 September 2016 18: 05
          0
          No, they are right. We can. Yes, to hell they are needed. We can do everything. Cowards, they know, from a single probability, were recorded.
    4. JIaIIoTb
      JIaIIoTb 5 September 2016 12: 42
      +2
      All the wars between Sweden and Russia always ended in a long peace and the loss of territories previously owned by the Swedes. I don’t even know what they are ready to lose for the sake of a lasting peace laughing .
    5. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 5 September 2016 14: 46
      +3
      Not, rather, extreme cynicism, and illiteracy, for ska forgot the contract of purchase and sale of September 10, 1721, these lands! It is possible to remind. According to the Nystadt Peace Treaty between Russia and Sweden, "eternal, true and inviolable peace on earth and water was established." , Narva, Vyborg, Kexholm, the Ezel, Dago, Moon islands and all other lands from Vyborg to the Kurland border. Russia paid Sweden 2 million gold efimks (thalers). (At the current exchange rate, without the accrued interest, this is about $ 350 billion.) Swedes, hello? Forgot ? 350 billion if that! And do not think that we will not return ours!
      1. Old warrior
        Old warrior 5 September 2016 18: 45
        +1
        In Helsinki, in 1976, an agreement on the inviolability of borders was also signed ... and where are these borders now? Creatures (west) are preparing for Rangaryok. Maybe this is their last chance to destroy Russia. Our task is to nip this garbage once and indeed FOREVER. We got it from yo to. Live calmly, for centuries, do not give.
  2. sir_obs
    sir_obs 5 September 2016 11: 42
    0
    Something does not fit. That is, the parts that were already buried in advance on the territory of the Baltic states?

    Well then, Sweden will not last long even with the help of NATO, if you argue in the same vein. That is, the Swedes need to push against entering into this very thing ...
  3. Atenon
    Atenon 5 September 2016 11: 43
    +2
    We don’t have to do this ..... pay taxes there!
    1. Evil543
      Evil543 5 September 2016 11: 45
      +1
      Where is the photo from? In the background is ours, and ak among the people.
      1. BARKAS
        BARKAS 5 September 2016 11: 58
        0
        Where is the photo from? In the background is ours, and ak among the people.

        This is most likely the Finns in their niche MTLB.
        1. Evil543
          Evil543 5 September 2016 12: 03
          +1
          There is an officer in an old uniform.
        2. Aleks tv
          Aleks tv 5 September 2016 12: 41
          +2
          Quote: BARKAS
          Where is the photo from? In the background is ours, and ak among the people.

          This is most likely the Finns in their niche MTLB.

          Not Michael.
          This is the Swedes at the training ground near Kamenka, a famous photo.
          There were exercises on the basis of the 138th brigade.
          We also drove to them, and also used their armor and weapons.
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 5 September 2016 11: 45
    +1
    ... the involvement of Sweden in the conflict after the Russian attack on Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia

    And is such money spent on such stupid analysts? When the cat has nothing to do, he ... So here. The desire to involve countries supporting neutrality in NATO makes us constantly keep the populations of these countries in suspense.
  5. Masya masya
    Masya masya 5 September 2016 11: 45
    +7
    "The document also says that if Sweden has a desire, NATO, of course, will accept it into its ranks (the accession procedure will take from 12 to 15 months), but this step will cause a political crisis in relations with Moscow. which is difficult to assess. "
    This is called, and I want and prick ...
  6. Walking
    Walking 5 September 2016 11: 50
    0
    Yes FIG it will stop Russia, if you suddenly need it and take the Baltic states and the Swedes will take their own. But it would be better if they sat quietly and did not provoke.
    1. UnclePasha
      UnclePasha 5 September 2016 11: 54
      +1
      It will stop for 15-20 minutes, stupidly neighing in front of the border and go on)))
    2. midivan
      midivan 5 September 2016 22: 45
      +1
      [/ quote] Yes FIG it will stop Russia [quote]
      Well, I don’t know, I don’t know, personally the fighter in the photo, which in the foreground, would definitely stop me for a couple of hours feel
  7. 24rus
    24rus 5 September 2016 11: 51
    0
    It's all about Nord Stream
  8. Monos
    Monos 5 September 2016 11: 54
    +5
    however, Americans "will need at least three weeks to arrive," the report said.


    I do not understand, but why amer? Is America such a comic book character, such as the Black Cloak, who is always "in a hurry to help"? The report is a clear order. And I guess whose.
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 5 September 2016 12: 05
      +3
      Who else? Shaving? They get out with the EU, already sparkle the heels. Germany? France? Now they don’t have their problems as if. And the Americans are a stopper for all barrels. Again, democracy must be spread.
      I really don’t understand, American generals themselves said recently that there are not enough US deployed troops in Europe to contain the Russian Federation, and it takes at least a month to transfer the necessary number! If no one will interfere.
      Is that what Swedes are counting on? What in case of a mess we will silently observe how the American group is replenished?
  9. knn54
    knn54 5 September 2016 11: 58
    +1
    NATO is a pyramid. In order not to collapse, they need constant expansion - the adoption of new members.
  10. Wedmak
    Wedmak 5 September 2016 11: 59
    0
    after the Russian attack on Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia

    So they were given to us? We will successfully replace sprats with sprats, the Baltic is already visible through us, so .. relax.
    In this case, Sweden will need outside help, but the Americans “will need at least three weeks

    This is on condition that the Americans want to harness themselves (which is unlikely, they need it?) And no one will bother them (and after all they will, even as they will).
    however, this step will cause a political crisis in relations with Moscow, “the scale of which is difficult to assess”

    Really. It’s better to think now than to tear your hair out in all the pink places.
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 5 September 2016 12: 13
      +1
      Quote: Wedmak
      Sprats will be successfully replaced with sprats,

      So the Baltic sprats this is smoked sprat in oil laughing
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 5 September 2016 12: 22
        +2
        So the trademark must be changed.
  11. tinibar
    tinibar 5 September 2016 12: 02
    +3
    Somehow, Russia has already attacked Sweden. Near Poltava ... laughing
  12. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 5 September 2016 12: 08
    0
    Three weeks? And they sincerely BELIEVE that the "exceptional nation" will send their guys to die for some kind of Sweden, which most of them will not show on the map? Here are naive. One thing I cannot understand - why did these Sprotlandies surrender to Russia? They themselves are coping with the decline of the indigenous population, and without any outside help.
    When these territories are completely depopulated, it will be possible to talk about who and on what conditions they will be populated. In the meantime, no one is interested in their barking.
  13. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 5 September 2016 12: 15
    0
    I got the strong impression that Euroanalysts and NATO analysts like them (according to Putin, "stupid, ...") do not read VO. And if they do, then the comments in the plan: "why the heck do we need the poor Baltic states if we don't need an impoverished Ukraine", are perceived as misinformation, further on Lavrov: "... damn it."
  14. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 5 September 2016 12: 22
    +3
    Quote: Wedmak
    Sprats will be successfully replaced with sprats,

    For the 3 year I’ve been buying a medium-sized kalechka, in a smokehouse with alder wood and immediately calling my friends. 30 -40 minutes while driving, still warm in olive oil ... We arrived, brought, delivered, had a snack with these sprats ...!
    Okay, don’t swear. I see, drooling .... Wait, I’ll call the peasants, and to hell with her from the Baltic states and Sweden too!
    1. Old warrior
      Old warrior 5 September 2016 18: 48
      +2
      Well, you and ha-a-d ... drinks
  15. Tusv
    Tusv 5 September 2016 12: 23
    +1
    The authors of the report do not take a specific position on the long-discussed issue of the possible entry of Sweden, traditionally neutral, into NATO

    I saw Swedish neutrality from the island of Gotland. More precisely, it is easier to list the NATO pepelats who did not take off from there. With great pleasure nafigat this nasty little piece of sushi
  16. Zubr
    Zubr 5 September 2016 12: 26
    +1
    laughing laughing laughing Here are sick people, magical, head-on .... wassat
  17. BOB044
    BOB044 5 September 2016 12: 28
    +3
    And who needs these Baltic countries. Conquer to feed them and develop industry. Thanks to the USSR, this has already been done and the result. They are about industry ..... and everything has collapsed. The population is fleeing the country. They can only graze pigs. But in Russia we have our own large pig-breeding complexes. So let them eat sprats and bark from under the gates of Russia that lives and thrives. hi
  18. Zubr
    Zubr 5 September 2016 12: 31
    +1
    Quote: Wedmak
    Who else? Shaving? They get out with the EU, already sparkle the heels. Germany? France? Now they don’t have their problems as if. And the Americans are a stopper for all barrels. Again, democracy must be spread.
    I really don’t understand, American generals themselves said recently that there are not enough US deployed troops in Europe to contain the Russian Federation, and it takes at least a month to transfer the necessary number! If no one will interfere.
    Is that what Swedes are counting on? What in case of a mess we will silently observe how the American group is replenished?


    Well, my friend, it’s so radical, let’s fantasize ... smile
  19. masiya
    masiya 5 September 2016 12: 31
    0
    Whatever the child would amuse, only Russia is to blame for everything and wants to capture everyone and force-feed and drink the occupied territories with an avid population ...
  20. Evgenijus
    Evgenijus 5 September 2016 12: 32
    +2
    All these reports of "analysts" are an order of the ruling elites of these countries. Because they are at the helm of budgets, they own the banks and financial resources of the country. The entry of another country into NATO increases the cash flow through banks, increases the profit of banks, the income of their owners. And everyone knows how the budgets of these countries are cut. Gold forks and spoons for the army (in the famous Baltic country), silver flasks for soldiers, etc. The casket just opens.
  21. Baloo
    Baloo 5 September 2016 12: 33
    +1
    Sweden's entry into NATO makes Sweden a big target and threatens the life of every Swede. Swedes, is it NATO?
  22. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 5 September 2016 12: 33
    +1
    It is curious that no one asks the question: "In what case will Russia need to" seize "the Baltic countries?" And there is only one answer - only if the NATO countries start an aggression against the Kaliningrad region or these notorious "Baltic states" completely close the "corridor" to Kaliningrad. This means that something is being prepared in NATO on this matter, hence the "wind blows".
  23. sergej30003
    sergej30003 5 September 2016 12: 41
    +1
    from a different angle, you need to write headings, for example, the capture of NATO by neutral countries, like Sweden, this is slaughtering it as a victim of the interests of others
  24. aszzz888
    aszzz888 5 September 2016 12: 51
    0
    Forgotten how the bits were. Bits, like wacky DOGS! bully
  25. novel66
    novel66 5 September 2016 13: 00
    +5
    in fact, the Swedes sold the Baltic states to us, and it's time to demand money back, as the goods turned out to be defective and smelly. maybe a warranty repair?
    1. midivan
      midivan 5 September 2016 22: 58
      0
      [/ quote] In fact, the Swedes sold the Baltic states to us, and it's time to demand money back, since the goods turned out to be defective and smelly. maybe a warranty repair? [quote]
      Well, the warranty period has already expired a long time ago, and instead of repairing "Vef 202 or 212), it is better to buy a digital receiver, and this one is like a rarity on the shelf laughing
  26. bashkort
    bashkort 5 September 2016 13: 04
    0
    Bullshit, but someone dough and other buns on this will have, definitely.
  27. Vadim237
    Vadim237 5 September 2016 13: 19
    0
    And the Swedes themselves were asked - it’s NATO they generally NEED.
  28. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 5 September 2016 13: 31
    0
    But who needs your Baltic, clowns.
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 5 September 2016 14: 10
    0
    In how Swedes sausages after Poltava only when thinking of Russia! Yes
  31. FEDY
    FEDY 5 September 2016 14: 10
    0
    like Swedes want to say that they are smelling from stars
    her.Petra. 1 ...))), ..
  32. Ivan Ivanov
    Ivan Ivanov 5 September 2016 14: 42
    0
    Quote: kotvov
    idiocy blooms wildly.

    If we are talking about stopping our answer, everything is very logical.
  33. axay032
    axay032 5 September 2016 15: 42
    0
    Quote: Cyclops
    the text

    "Over the past 100 years, Russia has lost one territory after another. Ultimately, all empires tend to disintegrate."

    Again this cyclops, I came across on another branch. And also stinks.
    He would be expected and loved by the censor there,
  34. v.yegorov
    v.yegorov 5 September 2016 15: 48
    0
    And the "analysts" did not consider such an issue - after Sweden joined NATO
    Russians will first burn Sweden, and then deal with the Baltic states?
  35. Altona
    Altona 5 September 2016 16: 02
    0
    Isn’t it enough in 1709? Do you want to repeat?
  36. Russia
    Russia 5 September 2016 16: 58
    0
    Analysts suggest that "Russia may seize the Baltic states within a few days and then will want to deploy air defense systems on Swedish territory, for example, Gotland, in order to prevent NATO flights over the Baltic Sea."

    All of Andersen's fantasies cannot be compared with the "scary tales" of these "analysts."
  37. Stariknv
    Stariknv 5 September 2016 17: 02
    0
    Baltic Russia is unnecessary. Not that attack and then contain.
  38. Old warrior
    Old warrior 5 September 2016 18: 37
    +1
    What kind of fools? What, they don’t let Karl’s laurels sleep on the 12th? So not the first time to these Scandinavians, in which case, we also pull our legs.
  39. Andrey Gladkikh
    Andrey Gladkikh 5 September 2016 19: 29
    0
    What difference does it make - one state in NATO is more, one less. Sweden has never been a friendly state for us. At best, neutral. But looking towards our opponents. I am sure that the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation has planned measures in case Sweden joins NATO.
  40. razved
    razved 5 September 2016 20: 25
    0
    This is how NATO wants to want to discredit the rank of analysts with such nonsense.
  41. Niccola Mack
    Niccola Mack 6 September 2016 09: 53
    0
    I think the Swedes are still not so meager to first glue the doll themselves, then inflate and paint it, and then get seriously scared.
    And no matter how much the "cold war" was erected on our Navy (and submarines crawl along the bottom, and our robots climb into the drain pipes almost to every toilet bowl) - no one was too worried.
    And even the landing on the stones in the Swedish waters of the C-363 of the "Swedish Komsomolets" there was no particular hysteria - the Swedes themselves even helped to remove it from the stones.
    Swedes throughout the Second World War were in neutrality (although they drove iron ore to Germany at a frantic pace).
    And most likely now the reaction will be like this - you guys sort it out, and we’ll do better to stamp the “Nokia” tires and turn the nuts on the “Volvo” - just don’t poke your nose at us.
  42. fsps
    fsps 6 September 2016 13: 17
    0
    Well, at least someone would tell something, why Russia needs the Baltic states? What will she have from them, except for expenses and a headache? Transit? So it is now, and it seems that it is drying up - it is unprofitable, and it is not known what the Nazis will do tomorrow. Enlighten who can.